Sani v. Rajnish

IN THE HON’BLE COURT OF PRINCIPAL JUDGE
(SHAHDARA), FAMILY COURT, DELHI
HMA NO……….2022
IN THE MATTER OF:-
MS. SANI AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
D/O SH. HARILAL PANDEY,
W/O SH. RAJNISH SHUKLA,
R/O H. NO.664, GALI NO – 2, SAINI
VIHAR MUNDAKA VILLAGE, BAKKARWALA,
WEST DELHI, DELHI-110041,
M: 9654398313 …..PETITIONER NO.1
VERSUS
MR. RAJNISH SHUKLA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
S/O SH. RAMSUBHAVAN SHUKLA,
R/O GRAM P.S. PARSURAM, BHAISAHA,
DISTT. BASTI, UTTAR PRADESH - 272130
P.S.-
PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE BY A DECREE

OF DIVORCE BY MUTUAL CONSENT UNDER SECTION 13-
B(I) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 AS AMENDED BY
THE MARRIAGE LAWS (AMENDMENT) ACT, 1976.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:-
1. That the marriage was solemnized between the parties
according to Hindu Rites & Ceremonies on 13.12.2015 at
H.No- 678. New Rajendra Lakada Marg, Firni Road, Near
Kansal Dhramkata Bali Gali, Mundaka, Delhi. The
Marriage Card is annexed herewith as Annexure-P1 The
Aadhar Card of Petitioner No.1 and Petitioner No.2 are
annexed herewith as Annexure-P2 and Annexure-P3
respectively.
2. That the status, age and place of residence of the parties

to the marriage, before the marriage and at the time of
filing the present petition were/are as follows:-
HUSBAND/PETITIONER NO.2
STATUS AGE PLACE OF

RESIDENCE.
Before Hindu Bachelor 29 GRAM P.S.
Marriage PARSURAM,
Years
BHAISAHA,
DISTT. BASTI, UTTAR
PRADESH - 272130
STATUS AGE PLACE OF

RESIDENCE.
At the time Hindu Married 29 GRAM P.S.
Of Filing the PARSURAM,
Petition BHAISAHA,
DISTT. BASTI, UTTAR
PRADESH - 272130
RAM NAGAR,
SHAHDARA, DELHI-
110032
Wife / PETITIONER NO.1
STATUS AGE PLACE OF

RESIDENCE.
Before Hindu Spinster 29 GRAM P.S.
PARSURAM,
Marriage
BHAISAHA,
DISTT. BASTI, UTTAR
PRADESH - 272130
At the time Hindu Married 29 GRAM P.S.

of Filing the PARSURAM,
Petition BHAISAHA,
DISTT. BASTI, UTTAR
PRADESH - 272130
3. That after the marriage, the respondent was came to the

Matrimonial Home, where the marriage between the
Petitioner No.1 and the Petitioner No.2 was consummated.
No issue was born from said wedlock.
4. That within 7 days from the marriage, some differences

arose between the petitioners and inspite of the best
efforts of the petitioners as well as their parents, relations
and common friends, the temperamental differences and
thinking pattern of the parties herein could not be
reconciled and ultimately the petitioners started living
separately since 05.03.2018 and even thereafter they have
all along been living separately.
5. That due to intervention of family members and relatives
both the parties entered into a mutual settlement by way
of which both decided to obtain decree of divorce by way of
mutual settlement. The Copy of settlement deed dated
23.09.2022 is annexed herewith as Annexure-P4
6. That broadly the terms and conditions of the settlement
agreement between the parties are as under:-
a. That both the parties shall file a joint petition for
divorce u/s 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 as
amended up to date, before the Family Court, Delhi,
within 15 days of the execution of this Compromise-
cum-Settlement Deed and both the parties undertake
to cooperate each other in obtaining divorce by way of
mutual consent.
b. That it has been agreed between the parties that within
one month after the quashing / disposing off FIR as

aforesaid parties shall file joint petition for second
motion divorce petition under section 13B(2) of H.M.A
before the concerned family court, Delhi along with the
application for waiving of stipulated period of 6 months.
c. That, however, in case the application of the parties to
waive of the stipulated period of 6 months is not
allowed and leave is not granted by the Hon’ble court to
the parties for second motion divorce Petition prior to
the stipulated period of 6 months then the Second
motion divorce petition shall be filed within 15 days
after the expiry of stipulated period of Six months.
d. That it has been agreed that Petitioner No. 1 shall have
no claim in respect of her maintenance and her child
baby Kanak's Maintenance in future and her all she
also abandons claims of Maintenance which have been
decided in Case No. Mt. 250/2018 titled Sunny@Sani
Vs, Rajnish Shukla which was decided ex- Parte on
dated 17.01.2019 and she undertakes not to file any
execution case in respect to the amount awarded in
said case in future.

e. That it has been agreed between the parties that after
the allowing of First Motion Petition the Petitioner No.1
shall cooperate in the quashing /disposal of FIR No.
290/2018 PS Mundaka titled State versus Rajnish
Shukla & Ors.
f. That the custody of Baby Kanak shall remain with the
First Party/ Wife for whole life and the Petitioner No. 1
shall be responsible of her bringing, welfare and her
marriage and she is also taking all responsibility of her
minor child and shall not claim maintenance for herself
and her daughter in future. It is also agreed by
Petitioner No. 1 that she is also abandons, relinquish
all the rights of herself and her baby Kanak in the
movable and immovable properties of Petitioner No. 2
and undertakes not to claim the same in future.
g. That Petitioner No. 1 has already received her all
Ishtridhan and all her things from Petitioner No. 2 and
she undertakes to not to claim any Ishtridhan,
Alimony, Permanent, Past, Present and future from
Petitioner No. 2in future.

h. That it has been agreed between the parties that after
the grant of Divorce by mutual consent and
withdrawing of all cases, if any, and after fulfilling the
all the terms and condition of this compromise/
settlement deed the both the parties undertakes not to
file any type of case, either civil, criminal or
matrimonial against each other and family members of
each other in any court of law/authority/police station
in any circumstances, in future in any manner.
i. That if either party or their family members have filed
any complaint/case either against each other and/or
any other family member in any court of law, police or
any other authority either in Delhi or any other Part of
India which is not in the knowledge of the either party
then it shall be deemed to be considered as
compromised and withdrawn in terms of this
compromise deed and shall not have any legal effect.
j. That after the divorce granted by the Hon‘ble Court the
parties shall live their life independently with their own
free will and none of the parties shall claim any relation
in regard to the said marriage. Further Parties shall not
interfere in the life of each other in any manner.
k. That the parties have entered into the present
settlement out of their free will and consent and the
above settlement is free from any undue influence,,
coercion, misrepresentation and duress. Hence, both
the parties undertake to abide by the terms of the
present of the present compromise deed and shall not
repudiate the same.
l. That it has been mutually decided and agreed by the
parties that if any party impliedly or expressly breaches
or does not fulfil the terms and condition of this
compromise deed, the defaulter party shall be liable to
pay Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rs.One Lac Only) to the other
party, as damages.
PRAYER :
It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that the marriage
between the petitioners to the petition may kindly be dissolved
by a decree of divorce by mutual consent and statement of both

the petitioners may be recorded under Section 13(B)(1) of Hindu
Marriage Act, in the interest of justice.
It is prayed accordingly.
Petitioner No. 1 Petitioner No. 2

(Ms. Sani ) (Sh. Rajnish Shukla)
Through
K.K.Singh and associates Ashish Ruhela, Adv

Advocate for Petitioner No. 1 Advocate for Petitioner
No. 2
Chamber No. S-21, Western
Wing, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi-110054 M:9810673660
E-mail:
advkksingh@gmail.com M: 9968167320
Enrol: D/2629/2006 Enrol.: D/ /
Delhi
Dated: .04.2022
Verification:
Verified at New Delhi on 00.00.2022 that the contents of paras

1 to 5 of the above petition are true and correct as per the
personal knowledge and information of Petitioner No. 1 and the
contents of clauses a) to l) of para 6 of the petition are true and
correct as per the legal advise received and believed to be true
and last para is prayer clause.
Petitioner No.1
Verification:
Verified at New Delhi on 00.00.2022 that the contents of paras

1 to 5 of the above petition are true and correct as per the
personal knowledge and information of Petitioner No. 2 and the
contents of clauses a) to l) of para 6 of the petition are true and
correct as per the legal advise received and believed to be true
and last para is prayer clause.
Petitioner No.2
NEW DELHI
DATE-19.04.2022
(SHAHDARA), FAMILY COURT , DELHI
HMA NO……….2022
IN THE MATTER OF:-
MS. SANI …..PETITIONER NO.1
VERSUS
SH. RAJNISH SHUKLA …..PETITIONER NO.2
AFFIDAVIT
I, SANI D/o Sh. HARI LAL PANDEY W/o Sh. Rajnish Shukla
R/o H. NO.664, GALI NO – 2, SAINI VIHAR MUNDAKA
VILLAGE, BAKKARWALA, WEST DELHI, DELHI-110041, aged
about 29 years, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under
:-
1. That I say that I am the Petitioner No. 1 in the aforesaid
case and am aware of the facts of this case and hence
competent to swear this affidavit.
2. That I say that my marriage was solemnized with
Petitioner No. 2 as per Hindu Rites and ceremonies at
Delhi on 13.12.2015 and thereafter due to some

temperamental differences and strained relationship,
various litigation had started between the parties due to
which the Parties herein are living separately since
05.03.2018.
3. That I say that after the solemnization of the marriage, we
had resided together within the territorial jurisdiction of
this Hon’ble Court.
4. That I say that all the disputes between the parties herein
have been settled vide Settlement Agreement dated
23.09.2022 pursuant to which the parties herein have
decided to file this petition for seeking divorce on mutual
consent.
5. That I say that I shall be bound by the terms and
conditions mentioned in the Settlement Agreement dated
23.09.2022, as stated in the accompanying First Motion
Petition, and hence I undertake to comply with the same.
7. That I say that the contents of the accompanying Petition
filed under Section 13-B(1) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1956
have been drafted under my instructions and that the

same are true and correct as per my personal knowledge
and information.
8. That I say that the accompanying Petition for divorce on
mutual consent basis has not been filed in collusion as
despite best efforts we have not been able to reconcile our
differences.
9. That I say that the copies of the annexures annexed with
the accompanying are true and correct copies of their
respective originals/ copies as available with me.
10. That I say that the contents of this affidavit are true and
correct.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
Verified at New Delhi on this 00.00.2022 that the contents
of paras 1 to 10 of the above affidavit are true and correct
as per my personal knowledge and information and
nothing material has been concealed therefrom.
DEPONENT
HMA NO……….2022
IN THE MATTER OF:-
VERSUS
AFFIDAVIT
I, Sh. Rajnish Shukla S/o Sh. Ram Shubhawan Shukla, R/o

GRAM P.S. PARSURAM, BHAISAHA, DISTT. BASTI, UTTAR
PRADESH - 272130, aged about 29 years, do hereby solemnly
affirm and declare as under :-
05.03.2018.
3. That I say that after the solemnization of the marriage, we
had resided together within the territorial jurisdiction of
this Hon’ble Court.
4. That I say that all the disputes between the parties herein
have been settled vide Settlement Agreement dated
23.09.2022 pursuant to which the parties herein have
decided to file this petition for seeking divorce on mutual
consent.
conditions mentioned in the Settlement Agreement dated
23.09.2022, as stated in the accompanying First Motion
Petition, and hence I undertake to comply with the same.
7. That I say that the contents of the accompanying Petition
filed under Section 13-B(1) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1956
have been drafted under my instructions and that the
same are true and correct as per my personal knowledge
and information.

despite best efforts we have not been able to reconcile our
differences.
9. That I say that the copies of the annexures annexed with
the accompanying are true and correct copies of their
respective originals/ copies as available with me.
10. That I say that the contents of this affidavit are true and
correct.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
DEPONENT
IN THE HON’BLE COURT OF PRINCIPAL JUDGE (SHAHDARA), FAMILY
COURT , DELHI
HMA NO……….2022
IN THE MATTER OF:-
VERSUS
MEMO OF PARTIES
MS. SANI AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
D/O SH. HARILAL PANDEY,
W/O SH. RAJNISH SHUKLA,
R/O H. NO.664, GALI NO – 2, SAINI
VIHAR MUNDAKA VILLAGE, BAKKARWALA,
WEST DELHI, DELHI-110041,
VERSUS
MR. RAJNISH SHUKLA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS

S/O SH. RAMSUBHAVAN SHUKLA,
R/O GRAM P.S. PARSURAM, BHAISAHA,
DISTT. BASTI, UTTAR PRADESH - 272130

(MS. SANI) (MR. RAJNISH SHUKLA)
Through

Advocate for Petitioner No. 1 Advocate for Petitioner No. 2
Chamber No. S-21, Western Wing, Tis
Hazari Courts ,Delhi-110054
M:9810673660 M: 9968167320
E-mail: advkksingh@gmail.com Enrol.: D/ /
Enrol: D/2629/2006
Delhi
Dated: .04.2022
HMA NO……….2022
IN THE MATTER OF:-
VERSUS

INDEX
Sr. PARTICULARS PAGE C.FEES

No. S
1. Memo of Parties
2. Petition of Divorce U/s 13 (B) () of H.M.A.
3. Affidavits in support of the petition.
4. List of documents alongwith documents.
6. Vakalatnama
(Rashmi Verma) (Ankit Kumar Rohilla)
Through

M:9810673660 M: 9968167320
Enrol: D/2629/2006
Delhi
Dated: .04.2022
HMA NO……….2022
IN THE MATTER OF:-
VERSUS

LIST OF DOCUMENTS
S No. Particulars Page

No.’s
1. Copy of the marriage invitation Card .
2. Identity Proof of Petitioner No.1 and Petitioner No.2
3. Copy of Settlement Agreement Dated 27.01.2022
(Rashmi Verma) (Ankit Kumar Rohilla)
Through

M:9810673660 M: 9968167320
Enrol: D/2629/2006
Delhi
Dated: .04.2022
HMA NO……….2022
IN THE MATTER OF:-
VERSUS
AFFIDAVIT
about 29 years, Petitioner No.1 do hereby certify that the
documents annexed to the petition are true copies of their
respective originals. The documents so annexed are self-
attested and if the same are found to be false or fabricated, I
shall make myself liable for civil and criminal legal action. I
undertake to submit the duly signed attested petition, in
original in the court, and to make up the deficiency, if any in
the court fee within the stipulated time frame.
SANI
D/o Sh. HARI LAL PANDEY
W/o Sh. Rajnish Shukla
R/o H. NO.664, GALI NO – 2,
SAINI VIHAR MUNDAKA VILLAGE,
BAKKARWALA, WEST DELHI,
DELHI-110041
HMA NO……….2022
IN THE MATTER OF:-
VERSUS
AFFIDAVIT

PRADESH - 272130, aged about 29 years, Petitioner No.2 do
hereby certify that the documents annexed to the petition are
true copies of their respective originals. The documents so
annexed are self-attested and if the same are found to be false
or fabricated, I shall make myself liable for civil and criminal
legal action. I undertake to submit the duly signed attested
petition, in original in the court, and to make up the deficiency,
if any in the court fee within the stipulated time frame.
Rajnish Shukla
S/o Sh. Ram Shubhawan Shukla,
R/o GRAM P.S. PARSURAM,
BHAISAHA, DISTT. BASTI,
UTTAR PRADESH - 272130
HMA NO……….2022
IN THE MATTER OF:-
VERSUS
CERTIFICATE
I, K.K.Singh, Advocate Ch. No.S-21, Western Wing, Tis Hazari

Court, Delhi-110054 Enrol. No.D/2629/2006 do hereby certify
that I have personally verified the copies of the documents of
the petitioner No.1 enclosed with the petition with the originals
and that the same are true copies of respective originals. I also
undertake to submit the duly signed and attested petition , in
original in the court , and to make up the deficiency, if any in
the court fee within the stipulated time frame.
K.K.Singh, Advocate
BCD Enrol No. D/2629/2006
Ch. No.S-21. Western Wing,
Tis Hazari Court, Delhi-110054
M:9810673660; E-mail-advkksingh@gmail.com
HMA NO……….2022
IN THE MATTER OF:-
VERSUS
CERTIFICATE
I, Ashish Ruhela, Advocate Office at ………………………………,

Enrol. No.D/ / do hereby certify that I have
personally verified the copies of the documents of the petitioner
No.2 enclosed with the petition with the originals and that the
same are true copies of respective originals. I also undertake to
submit the duly signed and attested petition , in original in the
court , and to make up the deficiency, if any in the court fee
within the stipulated time frame.
Ashish Ruhela ,Advocate

Office at ……………….,
Enrol. No.D/……./……
M:9968167320 ; E-mail-ashishruhelaadv@gmail.com
IN THE HON’BLE COURT OF PRINCIPAL JUDGE (SHAHDARA), FAMILY
COURT , DELHI
HMA NO……….2022
IN THE MATTER OF:-
VERSUS
Advocate For P-1 Details :-

Name : K.K.Singh, Advocate
Advocate For P-2 Details :-

Name : Ashish Ruhela ,Advocate
Petitioner No – 1 Details :-
Name : Rashmi Verma
D/o Sh.Vinod Kumar Verma
W/o Sh. Ankit Kumar Rohilla
R/o H.No.WS-14,Bhagat Singh Gali,
Babrapur Shahdara, Delhi-110032,
M:9871626067
Petitioner No – 2 Details :-
Name: Mr. Ankit Kumar Rohilla
S/o Sh. Prem Sagar Rohilla
R/o 1/2213, Near Durga Mandir,
Ram Nagar, Shahdara, Delhi 110032
M:
HMA NO……….2022
IN THE MATTER OF:-
VERSUS
UNDERTAKING FOR FILING DEFICIENT COURT FEE

AND WELFARE FEE
I, K.K.Singh, Advocate Ch. No.S-21, Western Wing, Tis Hazari

Court, Delhi-110054 Enrol. No.D/1050/2003 do hereby
undertake that I shall file deficient court fee, if any and welfare
tickets on vakalatnama at the time of the filing of hard copy of
complete Petition.
K.K.Singh, Advocate
HMA NO……….2022
IN THE MATTER OF:-
VERSUS
UNDERTAKING FOR FILING DEFICIENT COURT FEE

AND WELFARE FEE
I, Ashish Ruhela, Advocate Office at ………………………………,

Enrol. No.D/ / do hereby do hereby undertake
that I shall file deficient court fee, if any and welfare tickets on
vakalatnama at the time of the filing of hard copy of complete
Petition.
Ashish Ruhela ,Advocate

HMA NO……….2022
IN THE MATTER OF:-
VERSUS
“I UNDERTAKE ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER’s THAT HE/SHE WILL

FILE THIS ENTIRE ORIGINAL PETITION/SUPPORTING AFFIDAVITS ETC., ON
A-4 SIZE PAPER ONLY, AS AND WHEN REQUIRED BY THE CONCERNED
COURT WHERE THE MATTER WILL BE MARKED.”
K.K.Singh, Advocate
HMA NO……….2022
IN THE MATTER OF:-
VERSUS
DETAILED AFFIDAVIT IN TERMS OF JUDGEMENT OF

HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI IN CASE TITLED RAJAT
GUPTA VS RUPALI GUPTA
about 29 years, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under
:-

05.03.2018.
3. That I say that after the solemnization of the marriage,
we had resided together within the territorial
jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court.
4. That I say that all the disputes between the Petitioner
No.1 and Petitioner No.2 herein have been settled vide
Settlement Agreement dated 23.09.2022 pursuant to
which the parties herein have decided to file this
petition for seeking divorce on mutual consent.
5. That I say that I have already received all my Ishtridhan
and all my belongings from the Petitioner No. 2 and I
undertake not to claim any Ishtridhan, Alimony,
Permanent, Past, Present and future from Petitioner
No.2 in future.
6. That as per the settlement agreement dated 23.09.2022
it has been agreed that Petitioner No. 1 shall have no
claim in respect of her maintenance and her child baby
Kanak's Maintenance in future and her all she also

abandons claims of Maintenance which have been
7. That it has been agreed between the parties that after
Shukla & Ors.
8. That the custody of Baby Kanak shall remain with the
Petitioner No. 1 that she is also abandons, relinquish all
the rights of herself and her baby Kanak in the movable

and immovable properties of Petitioner No. 2 and
undertakes not to claim the same in future.
10. That it has been mutually decided and agreed by the
party, as damages.
conditions mentioned in the Settlement Agreement
dated 28.03.2022, as stated in the accompanying First

Motion Petition, and hence I undertake to comply with
the same.
12. That I say that the contents of the accompanying
Petition filed under Section 13-B(1) of Hindu Marriage
Act, 1956 have been drafted under my instructions and
that the same are true and correct as per my personal
knowledge and information.
despite best efforts we have not been able to reconcile
our differences.
14. That I say that the copies of the annexures annexed
with the accompanying are true and correct copies of
their respective originals/ copies as available with me.
15. That I say that the contents of this affidavit are true
and correct.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
DEPONENT
HMA NO……….2022
IN THE MATTER OF:-
VERSUS
DETAILED AFFIDAVIT IN TERMS OF JUDGEMENT OF

HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI IN CASE TITLED RAJAT
GUPTA VS RUPALI GUPTA

PRADESH - 272130, aged about 29 years, do hereby solemnly
affirm and declare as under :-

05.03.2018.
3. That I say that after the solemnization of the marriage,
we had resided together within the territorial
jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court.
4. That I say that all the disputes between the parties
herein have been settled vide Settlement Agreement
dated 23.09.2022 pursuant to which the parties herein
have decided to file this petition for seeking divorce on
mutual consent.
5. That I say that Petitioner No. 1 has already received all
her Ishtridhan and all her belongings from the
Petitioner No. 2 and she undertakes not to claim any
Ishtridhan, Alimony, Permanent, Past, Present and
future from Petitioner No.2 in future.
6. That as per the settlement agreement dated 23.09.2022
it has been agreed that Petitioner No. 1 shall have no
claim in respect of her maintenance and her child baby
Kanak's Maintenance in future and her all she also

abandons claims of Maintenance which have been
Shukla & Ors.
8. That the custody of Baby Kanak shall remain with the
Petitioner No. 1 that she is also abandons, relinquish all
the rights of herself and her baby Kanak in the movable

and immovable properties of Petitioner No. 2 and
undertakes not to claim the same in future.
10. That it has been mutually decided and agreed by the
party, as damages.
conditions mentioned in the Settlement Agreement
dated 28.03.2022, as stated in the accompanying First

Motion Petition, and hence I undertake to comply with
the same.
12. That I say that the contents of the accompanying
Petition filed under Section 13-B(1) of Hindu Marriage
Act, 1956 have been drafted under my instructions and
that the same are true and correct as per my personal
knowledge and information.
despite best efforts we have not been able to reconcile
our differences.
14. That I say that the copies of the annexures annexed
with the accompanying are true and correct copies of
their respective originals/ copies as available with me.
15. That I say that the contents of this affidavit are true
and correct.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
DEPONENT

Sani v. Rajnish

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Sani v. Rajnish

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

IN THE HON’BLE COURT OF PRINCIPAL JUDGE

(SHAHDARA), FAMILY COURT, DELHI

IN THE MATTER OF:-

MS. SANI AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,

D/O SH. HARILAL PANDEY,

W/O SH. RAJNISH SHUKLA,

R/O H. NO.664, GALI NO – 2, SAINI

VIHAR MUNDAKA VILLAGE, BAKKARWALA,

WEST DELHI, DELHI-110041,

M: 9654398313 …..PETITIONER NO.1

MR. RAJNISH SHUKLA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS

S/O SH. RAMSUBHAVAN SHUKLA,

R/O GRAM P.S. PARSURAM, BHAISAHA,

DISTT. BASTI, UTTAR PRADESH - 272130

M: 6393105430 …..PETITIONER NO.2

PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE BY A DECREE

1. That the marriage was solemnized between the parties

according to Hindu Rites & Ceremonies on 13.12.2015 at

H.No- 678. New Rajendra Lakada Marg, Firni Road, Near

Kansal Dhramkata Bali Gali, Mundaka, Delhi. The

Marriage Card is annexed herewith as Annexure-P1 The

Aadhar Card of Petitioner No.1 and Petitioner No.2 are

annexed herewith as Annexure-P2 and Annexure-P3

2. That the status, age and place of residence of the parties

STATUS AGE PLACE OF

STATUS AGE PLACE OF

Wife / PETITIONER NO.1

STATUS AGE PLACE OF

At the time Hindu Married 29 GRAM P.S.

3. That after the marriage, the respondent was came to the

4. That within 7 days from the marriage, some differences

5. That due to intervention of family members and relatives

both the parties entered into a mutual settlement by way

of which both decided to obtain decree of divorce by way of

mutual settlement. The Copy of settlement deed dated

23.09.2022 is annexed herewith as Annexure-P4

6. That broadly the terms and conditions of the settlement

agreement between the parties are as under:-

a. That both the parties shall file a joint petition for

divorce u/s 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 as

amended up to date, before the Family Court, Delhi,

within 15 days of the execution of this Compromise-

cum-Settlement Deed and both the parties undertake

to cooperate each other in obtaining divorce by way of

b. That it has been agreed between the parties that within

one month after the quashing / disposing off FIR as

motion divorce petition under section 13B(2) of H.M.A

before the concerned family court, Delhi along with the

application for waiving of stipulated period of 6 months.

c. That, however, in case the application of the parties to

waive of the stipulated period of 6 months is not

allowed and leave is not granted by the Hon’ble court to

the parties for second motion divorce Petition prior to

the stipulated period of 6 months then the Second

motion divorce petition shall be filed within 15 days

after the expiry of stipulated period of Six months.

d. That it has been agreed that Petitioner No. 1 shall have

no claim in respect of her maintenance and her child

baby Kanak's Maintenance in future and her all she

also abandons claims of Maintenance which have been

decided in Case No. Mt. 250/2018 titled Sunny@Sani

Vs, Rajnish Shukla which was decided ex- Parte on

dated 17.01.2019 and she undertakes not to file any

execution case in respect to the amount awarded in