Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ebook download Multifrequency Electromagnetic Data Interpretation for Subsurface Characterization 1st Edition - eBook PDF all chapter
ebook download Multifrequency Electromagnetic Data Interpretation for Subsurface Characterization 1st Edition - eBook PDF all chapter
https://ebooksecure.com/download/interpreting-subsurface-seismic-
data-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/electromagnetic-composites-
handbook-models-measurement-and-characterization-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/advances-in-subsurface-data-
analytics-traditional-and-physics-based-machine-learning-ebook-
pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/how-to-prepare-for-data-
interpretation-for-cat-ebook-pdf/
(eBook PDF) Case Histories and Data Interpretation in
Medical Practice 3rd
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-case-histories-and-data-
interpretation-in-medical-practice-3rd/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/characterization-techniques-for-
perovskite-solar-cell-materials-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/magnetism-and-electromagnetic-
induction-for-jee-advanced-3rd-edition-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/real-time-data-acquisition-in-
human-physiology-real-time-acquisition-processing-and-
interpretation-a-matlab-based-approach-ebook-pdf/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/original-pdf-statutory-
interpretation-1st-edition-by-michelle-sanson/
Multifrequency
Electromagnetic Data
Interpretation for
Subsurface
Characterization
Siddharth Misra
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering,
College of Engineering, Texas A&M University, TX, United States;
Department of Geology and Geophysics, College of Geoscience,
Texas A&M University, TX, United States
Yifu Han
Schlumberger Beijing Geoscience Center, Beijing, China
Yuteng Jin
Harold Vance Department of Petroleum Engineering,
Texas A&M University, TX, United States
Pratiksha Tathed
Petrophysicist at BP, Houston, TX, United States
Elsevier
Radarweg 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands
The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, United Kingdom
50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means,
electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage
and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to
seek permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our
arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright
Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by
the Publisher (other than as may be noted herein).
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and
experience broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional
practices, or medical treatment may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in
evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described
herein. In using such information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety
and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or
editors, assume any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter
of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods,
products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
ISBN: 978-0-12-821439-8
The ideas, concepts, and formulations developed in this book can be applied to
several disciplines requiring material/process characterization, such as colloid
and interfacial sciences, bioscience, electrochemistry, geophysics, water re-
sources, geothermal resources, fossil energy resources, and mining exploration.
Multifrequency electromagnetic (EM) sensing and its interpretation is a crucial
tool to characterize the subsurface and materials. Characterization of materials
enables efficient and effective engineering of systems and processes. Multifre-
quency laboratory measurement of a dispersive EM property, such as electrical
conductivity, dielectric permittivity, or magnetic permeability, is commonly
analyzed for purposes of material characterization. Such an analysis requires
inversion of the multifrequency measurement based on a forward mechanistic/
empirical model. In doing so, the estimated parameters of the model serve as
characteristics/identifiers of the material.
Chapters 1 provides a comprehensive review of current practices in multi-
frequency EM data acquisition and interpretation in the laboratory and in the
subsurface. The chapter also provides information about various interpretation
models and workflows for geological characterization and formation evaluation.
The chapter presents the use of various EM logging tools for subsurface
multifrequency EM data acquisition. Several case studies of subsurface EM log
acquisition and interpretation are elaborated and analyzed in the chapter.
Different EM log-interpretation workflows are discussed for various formations,
including conventional sandstone, shaly-sand, carbonate, turbidities, and un-
conventional formations. At the end, Chapter 1 discusses the integration of EM
measurements with other physical measurements, such as nuclear magnetic
resonance and formation testing measurements, for purposes of reducing the
uncertainties in estimation and to estimate new formation properties that can
only be computed using joint-interpretation methods.
Chapters 2 provides a brief review of mechanistic and empirical models used
for multifrequency EM data interpretation. Chapter 2 first describes popular
empirical models that are used for the interpretation of resistivity measurements
acquired in the laboratory and subsurface environments. Next, the chapter pro-
vides information about various multifrequency mechanistic models that can be
used for the interpretation of high-frequency conductivity and permittivity
frequency-based measurements. Following that, several mechanistic models
xvii
xviii Preface
faster than MCMC-based inversion. The parameters are relatively easy to tune in
PSO method.
In summary, a detailed knowledge of reservoir rock properties is crucial for
efficient hydrocarbon production, geothermal resource development, and carbon
geo-sequestration, to name a few. Geoscientists and petrophysicists have
developed a variety of reservoir characterization techniques, such as seismic
surveys, well logging, and core analysis, to evaluate the storage potential,
resource potential, and producibility of subsurface reservoirs. Currently, a vast
majority of exploration and production activities are in geologically complex
reservoirs, such as shaly-sands, sand-shale laminations, igneous rocks, and
organic-rich mudrocks. New reservoir characterization techniques are required
to accurately estimate the reservoir properties.
Existing interpretation methods for subsurface EM measurements in for-
mations containing dispersed and/or laminated clay minerals, clay-sized grains,
and conductive minerals rely on empirical models and lack reliable mechanistic
models. Electrical conductivity anisotropy, dielectric permittivity anisotropy,
and interfacial polarization of these formations significantly influence the EM
measurements. Hence, the accuracy of estimation of petrophysical properties
based on conventional resistivity interpretation of the EM measurements is
generally improved by correlating the subsurface measurements with laboratory
measurements on core plugs. Subsurface EM measurements in shaly-sands,
sand-shale laminations, and organic-rich mudrocks, to name a few examples,
exhibit directional and frequency dispersive characteristics primarily due to the
effects of electrical conductivity anisotropy, dielectric permittivity anisotropy,
and interfacial polarization phenomena. Conventional resistivity interpretation
or high-frequency permittivity interpretation techniques for laboratory and
subsurface EM measurements do not account for the frequency-dependent ef-
fects of interfacial polarization phenomena. Consequently, the mechanistic
models, inversion-based multifrequency EM data interpretation techniques, and
subsurface data-processing workflows proposed in this book will be crucial for
improved subsurface characterization using multifrequency EM data.
Siddharth Misra
Texas, United States
04/02/2021
Acknowledgments
xxiii
Chapter 1
Multifrequency
electromagnetic data
acquisition and interpretation
in the laboratory and in the
subsurface: A comprehensive
review
Yifu Han1, Siddharth Misra2, 3, Yuteng Jin4
1
Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Beijing, China; 2Harold Vance Department of Petroleum
Engineering, College of Engineering, Texas A&M University, TX, United States; 3Department of
Geology and Geophysics, Texas A&M University, TX, United States; 4Harold Vance Department of
Petroleum Engineering, Texas A&M University, TX, United States
FIGURE 1.1 Keysight E5071C ENA vector network analyzer (on left) which can be used to
measure electromagnetic properties of porous materials, such as core samples; Keysight N1501A
coaxial probe (on right), which is placed on top of core samples for ensuring contact and
nondestructive measurements. From Garcia AP, Han Y, Heidari Z, October 2018. Integrated
workflow to estimate permeability through quantification of rock fabric using joint interpretation of
nuclear magnetic resonance and electric measurements. Petrophysics 59 (5), 672e693.
FIGURE 1.2 (A) Sandbox for multifrequency complex conductivity measurement on water-
saturated packs of glass beads. (B) Four-electrode array measurement setup and sample holder
for the spectral induced polarization experiments on packs of glass beads. From Leroy P, Revil A,
Kemna A, Cosenza P, Ghorbani A, 2008. Complex conductivity of water-saturated packs of glass
beads. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 321, 103e117.
6 Multifrequency Electromagnetic Data Interpretation
saturated and dry soil samples. The measurement system was set in frequency
range of 700 kHz to 7 GHz to measure 401 logarithmically spaced points.
Garcia et al. (2018) used the Keysight E5071C network analyzer and placed
Keysight N1501A coaxial probe on the top of fully water saturated core
samples to measure dielectric permittivity of these samples in the frequency
range of 20 MHz to 1 GHz. After the calibration process, Garcia et al. (2018)
placed carbonate core samples (dimension of 11/2 inch 11/2 inch or 11/2
inch 2 inch) in contact with the coaxial probe with a constant pressure,
which confirms the same contact quality between the core sample and the
coaxial probe for all the samples. They repeated multifrequency dielectric
permittivity measurements including the real and imaginary parts several times
in both sides of the samples, which eliminates the effects of surface roughness
of the core samples on data acquisition quality.
Fig. 1.3 illustrates the experimental setup of a Zurich Instruments MFIA by
Garcia et al. (2018) to measure the complex impedance of the rock samples in
the frequency range of 10 Hze500 kHz. They placed the core sample between
two metallic electrodes, and then tightened the core along a threaded rod
through the wing nuts. The two electrodes were in contact with core sample
and Zurich Instruments MFIA. A sinusoidal voltage excitation with an
amplitude of 300 mV was applied on the sample, and the resulting current was
recorded to obtain the complex impedance of the core samples. They repeated
the measurements and then reliably calculated electrical conductivity of rock
samples based on resistance at the minimum phase.
Sabouroux and Ba (2011) used microwave EpsiMu tool to measure com-
plex dielectric permittivity of Fontainebleau sand sample in central France,
Dune, of Pilat sand sample in Arcachon Bay area of France, and homogeneous
mixture of Fontainebleau sand and 10%e20% clay in the frequency range of
600 MHz to 1 GHz. They used two identical low-loss PVC plugs on each side
FIGURE 1.3 Schematic of two-terminal experimental setup for complex impedance spectros-
copy measurements of core samples. From Garcia AP, Han Y, Heidari Z, October 2018. Integrated
workflow to estimate permeability through quantification of rock fabric using joint interpretation of
nuclear magnetic resonance and electric measurements. Petrophysics 59 (5), 672e693.
Multifrequency electromagnetic data acquisition Chapter | 1 7
of the compacted sand sample to keep it in the coaxial part. The cable effects
were removed after VNA calibration process, and the measurement error of
real and imaginary parts of the complex dielectric permittivity were less than
1% and 1.5%, respectively. The drift error was not taken into account because
the duration of measurement was comparatively short and instrument setup
was relatively stable (Sabouroux and Ba, 2011).
Leroy et al. (2008) performed SIP experiments on four samples of glass
beads pack with different particle-size distributions and roughness using the
four-electrode measurement method. The operation frequency of SIP Fuchs
measuring device (setup illustrated in Fig. 1.2A) which is connected to
computer is between 101e104 Hz. Compared with the setup in Fig. 1.2A, the
secondary experimental setup in Fig. 1.2B, which is developed by the Central
Laboratory for Electronics in Germany, provides complex conductivity mea-
surements in the frequency range of 1 mHze45 kHz and higher phase accu-
racy which is less than 0.1 mrad below 1 kHz. The glass beads were put with
deionized water for several weeks before measurements. They also used a laser
granulometer (Laser Scattering Mastersizer, MALVERN) which operates in
the range of 50 nm to 2 mm to determine the particle-size distribution of
samples of glass beads pack under investigation (Leroy et al., 2008).
FIGURE 1.4 The comparisons between the measured and modeled phase spectra of complex
conductivity of (A) the smooth glass-bead pack sample and those of (B) both the smooth and rough
glass-bead pack samples. From Leroy P, Revil A, Kemna A, Cosenza P, Ghorbani A, 2008. Complex
conductivity of water-saturated packs of glass beads. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 321, 103e117.
the measured phase (dots) and modeled phase (solid line) of the complex
conductivity of smooth glass-bead pack sample under investigation. The first
peak of the phase of SIP measurements in Fig. 1.4 is around 75 mHz. The first
peak corresponds to the grain size distribution of the glass-bead pack under
investigation. Fig. 1.4B compares the measured (dots) and modeled (line)
phase spectra of the smooth and rough glass beads pack sample. The second
peak of the phase of complex conductivity at around 20 Hz is caused by the
roughness of the grain surface (Leroy et al., 2008).
The rock physical parameters in the triple-layer electrochemical model for
smooth glass-bead sample and rough glass-bead sample were obtained by
matching the model predictions with the measurements. The peak of grain size
distribution, density of the counterions in the Stern layer, density of the
counterions in the diffusion layer, and Dukhin number, which is the ratio of
particle surface conductivity to the bulk fluid conductivity multiplied by the
particle size, were estimated. The reported values are 187.5 mm, 6.0 1016
counterions/m2, 2.3 1016 counterions/m2, and 0.06, respectively (Leroy
et al., 2008). Fig. 1.5 presents the measured and estimated grain size distri-
bution of rough glass-bead pack. The complex conductivity measurements
were performed at three different conductivity of the pore-filling water phase:
1.7 102 S/m, 2.3 102 S/m, and 4.1102 S/m. The estimated grain size
distribution agrees well with the measurements, and can capture the dominant
grain size (Leroy et al., 2008).
Multifrequency electromagnetic data acquisition Chapter | 1 9
FIGURE 1.5 The comparison of measured (dots) and estimated (lines) grain size of a rough
glass-bead pack sample at various water conductivity. From Leroy P, Revil A, Kemna A, Cosenza P,
Ghorbani A, 2008. Complex conductivity of water-saturated packs of glass beads. J. Colloid
Interface Sci. 321, 103e117.
sandstone and Massillon sandstone. The SIP spectra experimental setup was
tested on NaCl brines before measurements, and they used WTW-3310 con-
ductivity meter to measure water conductivity and temperature before and
after SIP spectra measurements. They measured dielectric dispersion data on
the twin core samples from the same rock type. The core samples were
initially saturated with 0.1 ppk NaCl brine for few days before SIP spectra
measurements, then were cleaned and resaturated with 5 ppk NaCl brine for
another SIP measurements. Firstly, they inverted SIP spectra from 1 mHz to
100 Hz to estimate the cementation exponent, dominant grain radius, and CEC
by coupling the proposed differential effective-medium model. The water-
filled porosity, salinity, and volumetric fraction of the uncharged ellipsoidal
inclusions were input into the inversion scheme. The estimated dominant grain
radius by inversion of only low-frequency SIP spectra for both 0.1 ppk and 5
ppk brine saturated cases are illustrated in Fig. 1.6. The inversion estimates are
comparable to the volume-weighted grain size obtained from the image
analysis.
Following that, the SIP spectra and dielectric dispersion measurements
were jointly inverted to obtain water-filled porosity, salinity, cementation
exponent, dominant grain radius, and CEC. The estimated dominant grain size
for low-salinity brine (0.1 ppk) saturated measurements agree well with
effective volume-weighted grain size obtained by scanning electron micro-
scope images analysis, and were slightly underestimated but still reasonable
for high-salinity brine (5 ppk) saturated measurements. The inverted CEC is
FIGURE 1.6 The comparison of the volume-weighted grain size obtained from the image
analysis against the inversion-derived estimate of dominant grain size (R) by processing the
spectral induced polarization spectra measurements on 0.1 ppk and 5 ppk brine saturated core,
respectively. Modified from Seleznev N, Hou CY, Freed D, Habashy T, Feng L, Fellah K, June
17e21, 2017. Coherent interpretation of wideband electromagnetic measurements in the millihertz
to gigahertz frequency range. SPWLA 58th Ann. Logg. Symp.; Source: Authors.
Multifrequency electromagnetic data acquisition Chapter | 1 11
FIGURE 1.7 The comparison of the modeled imaginary part of complex conductivity based on
the wideband electromagnetic data inversion estimates against the measured imaginary conduc-
tivity for brine saturated core at salinity of (A) 0.1 ppk and (B) 5 ppk, respectively (Seleznev et al.,
2017). Source: Authors.
low since the samples are clean sandstone. Even though the sensitivity of
cementation exponent to SIP spectra varies with brine salinity, the inverted
cementation exponent is in the typical range of clean sandstone. Fig. 1.7A
shows that the modeled imaginary part of complex conductivity can charac-
terize the peak position of measured imaginary conductivity at low frequencies
when the salinity is low (0.1 ppk). However, Fig. 1.7B indicates that the
modeled imaginary conductivity cannot characterize the flattening of the
measured imaginary conductivity dispersion at low frequencies for the higher
salinity case (5 ppk). Even though few physical parameters can be reasonably
estimated by separately inverting the low-frequency SIP spectra or high-
frequency dielectric dispersion measurements, Seleznev et al. (2017)
mentioned that the joint inversion of the low-frequency SIP spectra and the
high-frequency dielectric dispersion measurements can more accurately and
reliably estimate more petrophysical parameters.