Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ALEMANIA Y SUS WOMEN
ALEMANIA Y SUS WOMEN
Work in pairs or groups to investigate more about the young people in Nazi Germany and the impact
of Nazi policies.
Task One
Find examples of activities for both the Hitler Youth and the League of German Girls. Also, find first-
hand accounts from German children about the youth movements. Try to find both negative and
positive accounts.
Task Two
Research the youth movements that challenged the Nazi drive for youth conformity. The most
famous of these include:
● the Edelweiss Pirates
● the Swing movement
● the White Rose movement.
For each group, research its membership, its aims and its activities, and the reaction of the Nazi
regime.
Task Three
What are your conclusions as to the success of the Nazi regime in indoctrinating the youth of
Germany?
1. What is the message of the poster in the left-hand margin regarding the roles of men and
women in Nazi Germany?
2. What other messages does this poster convey about Nazi beliefs concerning the ideal German
society that needed to be created/restored?
48
Activity 12 ATL Thinking skills
Research Nazi expectations for women with regard to fashion, lifestyle and their role in society. What
methods were used by the regime to try to get women to follow these expectations?
49
02 Hitler's Germany: 1933–1939
How far did the Nazis integrate the Churches into the
Volksgemeinschaft?
Activity 13 ATL Thinking skills
John Heartfield, ‘On the founding of the State Church’ ( June 1933). The caption reads: ‘The cross
was not heavy enough.’
What is the message of this poster?
This issue provided a serious challenge for the Nazis since the Germans were
divided by faith. As mentioned on page 42, the Nazis had initially taken measures to
reassure the Protestants, who represented the majority of the Germans, and they had
guaranteed the independence of the Catholic Church by signing the Concordat in
1933. However, even by mid-1933, it was clear that the Nazis were going to interfere in
religion.
The Nazi regime gave support to a growing movement among Protestants that was
known as the German Christians (Deutsch Christen). This movement believed that it was
possible to reconcile Protestant and Nazi beliefs and it established a new Reich Church
with the aim of combining all Protestants within one structure. Ludwig Müller was the
first Reich Bishop; he abolished all elected bodies within the Church and reorganized it
on the ‘leadership principle’. However, the actions of the German Christians created much
opposition. In September 1933, over 100 pastors created the Confessional Church,
which upheld orthodox Protestantism and rejected any attempt to link it to Nazi
beliefs. This Church was led by Pastor Niemöller and it had the support of about 7,000
pastors out of 17,000.
50
By 1935, it was clear that the Nazis had achieved only limited success in gaining
control over the Church. It was still difficult for the Nazis to attack the Churches head
on, for fear of alienating large numbers of Germans; thus a war of attrition developed.
The Ministry of Church Affairs, established in 1935 and led by Hanns Kerrl, now
attempted to undermine both the Protestant and Catholic Churches through a series of
anti-religious measures. These included discrediting church leaders by accusing them
of crimes such as sexual abuse and financial misbehaviour, and reducing the Churches’
influence over young people by closing church schools and youth groups. Less
emphasis was put on religion in schools and in the mid-1930s the Nazi Party launched
a ‘Church Secession Campaign’ to encourage Germans to abandon their churches.
However, the Nazis were not successful in coordinating the inclusion of the Churches
in the Volksgemeinschaft. The German Faith movement was a failure, gaining only very
limited support. The Confessional Church survived, and individual church leaders
continued to speak out against Nazism; Niemöller was very outspoken (and as a
result was put into a concentration camp in 1937) and Pope Pius XI attacked the Nazi
system in 1937 and also spoke out against the euthanasia programme in 1940. This
made it very difficult for the Nazis to launch an outright attack on religion. However,
the Churches also failed to provide effective opposition and they refrained from a
sustained attack on the Nazi regime.
The Nazis, social
Activity 14 ATL Thinking skills Darwinism and
eugenics
Read the source below. What reason does this historian give to explain the limited resistance of the
Churches to Nazism? Nazi ideology was
influenced by social
The churches’ opposition was ‘issue driven’ (that is to say involving piecemeal reactions to Darwinism, an intellectual
individual, concrete actions such as the withdrawal of crucifixes form schools, the movement that
appointment of a German Christian as Reich bishop, or euthanasia) rather than rooted in a developed in the 19th
coherent, politically active anti-Nazi morality. The churches and their followers generally century. Social Darwinists
were more interested in defending their religious ‘space’ and surviving attack than in applied basic principles
becoming society’s moral guardians. They wanted to write themselves into the overall from Charles Darwin’s
theory of evolution and
trajectory of the Third Reich rather than alter its direction per se. the concepts of national
Martyn Housden (1996). Resistance and Conformity in the Third Reich. Routledge, p. 64. selection and the ‘survival
of the fittest’ to society
and politics. Thus the
wealth and the power
Which groups were not included in the of the strong should be
Volksgemeinshaft? allowed to increase while
that of the weak should
To be a member of the Volksgemeinschaft it was essential to be a ‘true’ German, both in decrease; in the case of
Nazi ideology this meant
terms of loyalty and racial purity; the Volksgemeinschaft could not be contaminated by
that the Aryan race should
the ‘Untermenschen’. Such people included: be able to dominate the
‘inferior’ races. Linked to
Asocials: These were people who did not follow the ‘social norms’ imposed by the this movement was the
Nazis and included beggars, criminals, prostitutes, and alcoholics. Between 1933 and eugenics movement,
1938 such people were rounded up and sent to concentration camps. which believed that
society could be
Homosexuals: Homosexuals were regarded by the Nazis as degenerate and perverted, improved through the
and a threat to the Nazi goal of increasing the population. Overall some 100,000 men manipulation of its
were arrested for homosexuality, of whom about 50,000 were sent to concentration genetic makeup; in the
camps where they were treated particularly harshly. In addition, many were ‘cured’ by case of the Nazis this
means of castration or were subjected to medical experiments. meant first restricting
and then eliminating
The mentally ill or physically disabled: These people were regarded as a burden those groups who were
‘contaminating’ German
on society and a threat to the future of the Aryan race. Much of Nazi thinking was
society.
influenced by ‘eugenicists’ (see information box) who argued that a race could be
51
02 Hitler's Germany: 1933–1939
Religious sects: These were dealt with harshly. The Nazis were suspicious about
their international links, and most were banned in November 1933. While some sects
compromised with the Nazis in order to ensure their survival, the Jehovah’s Witnesses
were particularly hostile to the regime. As a result, many were arrested; about one-
third of Germany’s Jehovah’s Witnesses died in concentration camps.
Racial enemies, in particular the Roma and Sinti, and the Jews: Following
Himmler’s ‘Decree for the Struggle against the Gypsy Plague’, Roma and Sinti were
sent to camps, before being expelled to Poland when war broke out. They were sent to
Auschwitz in December 1942 where 11,000 of the 20,000 Roma and Sinti were gassed.
The Jews were also subjected to increasing persecution from 1933; this is covered in
full on pages 58–60.
52
How successful were the Nazis in changing society and
in creating a Volksgemeinschaft?
As you have read in this section, the Nazis were not successful in winning over all
Germans; quite often Germans conformed for reasons other than voluntarily wanting
to become part of the Volksgemeinschaft.
Historians have mostly agreed that the Volksgemeinschaft ideal was not completely
successful and that the Nazis failed to bring about any fundamental changes in society.
Ian Kershaw (2015) writes:
Some research… which paints an extremely complex picture of social behaviour and attitudes
under Nazism, suggests strongly that it is easy to exaggerate the nature of changes in values and
attitudes under Nazism and that here too there can be no suggestion of Nazism having effected a
social revolution. … There was some penetration of Nazi values and attitudes [but] the regime’s
social propaganda made little serious dent in traditional class loyalties, particularly among older
industrial workers. … The hold of the Church and clergy over the population, especially in
country areas, was often strengthened rather than weakened by the ‘Church struggle’. … Nazi
policy failed categorically to break down religious allegiances. Even in their attempt to inculcate
the German people with racial, eugenic, and social Darwinist values – the core of their ideology
– the Nazis, it appears, had only limited success. Enhancement of existing prejudice against Jews
and other racial minorities and ‘social outsiders’ unquestionably occurred… but… exposure to
Nazi race values had come nowhere near completely eradicating conventional moral standards.
The Nazi Dictatorship. Bloomsbury Revelations, pp. 205–207.
1. Create a mind map or other infographic to show the social policies used by the Nazi regime
in their attempt to create a Volksgemeinschaft. Indicate on your diagram the groups that were
targeted, which policies were successful and which were less successful or, indeed, a failure.
2. Which of these policies do you consider had the most radical impact on German society?
3. Which do you consider to be most successful and least successful in uniting Germans into a
Volksgemeinschaft?
Essay planning
Evaluate the success of Hitler’s social and religious policies in transforming German society.
Command term: Evaluate
Topic: Nazi social policies
Concept: Change
In this essay, make sure that you concentrate on the word ‘evaluate’. It is not enough just to describe
what Hitler did – you need to analyse the impact of his policies as you go through the essay.
Intro: Set out the aim of Hitler’s policies in creating a Volksgemeinschaft and indicate the
social policies to which you will refer. Set out your main argument regarding the
success or failure of his policies.
Paragraphs: You may want to break down the social policies so that you have a paragraph each
for women, youth and workers, in addition to a separate paragraph on religion.
Within every paragraph focus on the extent to which the policies successfully
transformed society – the ways in which radical change took place and the ways in
which in fact there was little change overall.
Conclusion: Come back to the question and make sure you have a clear answer based on the
evidence that you have provided.
53