Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ebook download (eBook PDF) Writing and Reporting for the Media 12th Edition all chapter
ebook download (eBook PDF) Writing and Reporting for the Media 12th Edition all chapter
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-writing-and-reporting-
for-the-media-workbook-12th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/original-pdf-writing-and-
reporting-for-the-media-11th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-news-reporting-and-
writing-12th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-writing-for-the-mass-
media-9th-edition/
News Reporting and Writing 13th Edition (eBook PDF)
http://ebooksecure.com/product/news-reporting-and-writing-13th-
edition-ebook-pdf/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-writing-for-the-mass-
media-9th-edition-by-james-g-stovall-when/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-public-relations-
writing-and-media-techniques-8th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-writing-and-reporting-
news-a-coaching-method-8th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-news-writing-and-
reporting-an-introduction-to-skills-and-theory/
CONTENTS
Preface xix
Sensationalism 21
Rumors 22
Sexual Assault 22
Names of Juveniles 22
Trade Names 22
The Importance of Accuracy 23
Accuracy in Facts 23
Accuracy in Names 24
Accuracy Is a Priority 24
GUEST COLUMNIST: Why I Stayed at a Small-Town Newspaper 25
THE REPORTER’S GUIDE to Accuracy 26
Review Exercises 27
Dangling Modifiers 57
Personification 57
Parallelism 58
Syntax 58
Spelling 59
Punctuation 59
Writing Like a Pro 59
Diction 59
Precision 60
Use Strong Verbs 61
Problems to Avoid 62
Overuse of Adjectives and Adverbs 62
Clichés 63
Slang 64
Technical Language and Jargon 64
Euphemisms 65
Profanity 66
Stating the Obvious 66
First-Person References 67
Negative Constructions 67
Echo 68
Gush 68
Vague Time References 68
Use of the Present Tense 69
Excessive Punctuation 69
THE WRITING COACH: Become a Power Lifter When Picking Verbs 71
THE REPORTER’S GUIDE to the Language of News 72
Review Exercises 73
Libel 80
The Elements of a Libel Suit 81
Who Is a Public Official? Who Is a Public Figure? 85
Major Defenses to Libel Suits 87
Steps for Avoiding Libel Suits 89
Privacy 90
Intrusion 90
Giving Publicity to Private Facts 92
False Light 93
Appropriation 94
Newsgathering Issues 94
Access to Nonjudicial Events and Records 95
x Contents
Prewriting 131
Identifying the Central Point 131
Story Outlines 132
Planning the Digital Story 133
CONTENTS xi
Criticisms 166
Types of Alternative Leads 167
“Buried” or “Delayed” Leads 167
Multiparagraph Leads 168
Quotation Leads 169
Question Leads 169
Suspenseful Leads 171
Descriptive Leads 171
Shockers: Leads with a Twist 172
Ironic Leads 173
Direct-Address Leads 173
Words Used in Unusual Ways 173
Other Unusual Leads 174
THE REPORTER’S GUIDE to Writing Alternative Leads 175
Review Exercises 176
xii Contents
Quotations 212
When to Use Direct Quotations 212
When to Use Indirect Quotations 214
When to Use Partial Quotations 215
When Sources Seek Quote Approval 216
Blending Quotations and Narrative 217
Explaining Quotations 217
To Change or Not to Change Quotations 218
Deleting Profanities 220
Editorialization 220
Attribution 221
The Purpose of Attribution 221
Statements That Require Attribution 221
Guidelines for the Placement and Frequency of Attribution 222
Direct Quotations 223
Partial Quotations 223
Indirect Quotations 224
Word Choice in Attributing Statements 224
Identifying Sources 225
THE WRITING COACH: Do You Use Said Enough? 228
THE REPORTER’S GUIDE to Quotations and Attribution 228
Review Exercises 230
CONTENTS xiii
Brights 337
Follow-Ups 339
Roundups 341
Sidebars 342
Obituaries 343
Writing the Biographical Obituary 344
Writing the Feature Obituary 346
THE REPORTER’S GUIDE to Writing Brights, Follow-Ups, Roundups,
Sidebars and Obituaries 348
Review Exercises 349
Courts 369
General Information about the Court System 370
Criminal Cases 371
Civil Cases 373
GUEST COLUMNIST: Developing Sources on the Police Beat 375
GUEST COLUMNIST: Journalists Deliver the Information the Public Needs 376
THE REPORTER’S GUIDE to Public Affairs Reporting 377
Review Exercises 378
Credits 473
Index 475
PREFACE
Y
ou might think the news business is in trouble if you look only at the
traditional measures of success: circulation and advertising revenue. The
New York Times’ daily circulation has dropped to about 570,000 printed
copies, and its advertising revenue from the print edition was $64 million for
the third quarter of 2017. But these numbers do not reflect the new realities
of U.S. journalism. While the Times has lost print subscribers, it has rapidly
gained digital subscribers. It now has 2.5 million people who pay to read the
newspaper online. The Times’ overall subscriber base has more than doubled
over the last four years. For the 2017 third quarter, digital subscription revenue
was $86 million. The transition from a print advertising revenue base to a digital
subscription revenue base has been a rocky one for the news business, and it is
not complete. But the Times and many other newspapers are profitable and are
looking to expand.
The readership and revenue numbers for the Times and for most other news
organizations reflect a changing industry. More and more Americans turn to
digital devices—computers, tablets, smartphones—for news. In the digital world,
however, advertisers depend less on traditional news and entertainment media
for access to the consumers they want to attract than they did in the print world.
As the news business has changed, so have the expectations for the men and
women starting careers in journalism. Journalism schools and departments are
rethinking their curriculums as they try to figure out what sets of skills will best
prepare their graduates for finding and holding jobs. At some schools, students
are learning how to write HTML code, tell stories visually, develop and manage
databases and even design video games. Other schools want students to become
proficient in multiple skills, such as shooting still and video images and creat-
ing webpages, as well as the more traditional journalistic skills. A few schools
have closed their journalism programs or merged them with other departments
and majors.
At the same time, news editors and producers who hire journalism graduates
want employees with solid skills in the core of writing, editing and researching.
They want reporters who can think critically to evaluate information and work in
teams to develop and present stories.
Just as the news business and journalism education have been changing, this
textbook has been changing. We have added material on such things as writing
xix
xx Preface
for digital media and visual journalism. At the same time, we remain commit-
ted to emphasizing the basic skills of journalism, skills that will be demanded of
all reporters, no matter whether they are writing for a traditional newspaper, a
television station, an online news organization, a blog or a public relations orga-
nization. Every journalist must be able to write clearly and correctly and make
complicated issues understandable and interesting.
The function of journalism that sets it apart from other jobs and commu-
nication businesses is its role in providing citizens in a democracy with the
information they need to govern their society. As James Madison said nearly
200 years ago, “Popular government without popular information, or the
means of acquiring it, is but a prologue to a farce or a tragedy or perhaps both.
K nowledge will forever govern ignorance. And a people who mean to be their
own governors must arm themselves with the power that knowledge gives.”
Self-government in the 21st century requires citizens to confront such issues
as health care, global warming, criminal justice, economic stability, international
trade, war and diplomacy. The catalogue of issues is long and daunting. To make
sound decisions about these issues, people need reliable information. And most
will get the bulk of it from journalists. The reporters who are best able to provide
that information will be ones who have a broad understanding of how s ociety
works and the ability to explain the issues and how they affect citizens in an
understandable and interesting manner.
The task of journalism is an important one, but much of the public doubts jour-
nalists and the news they provide. Complaints of bias and fakery are common.
Some people call news biased because it does not agree with their beliefs and
ideologies. Public officials often complain about unfairness or inaccuracies when
they are the target of critical coverage, even when the reports are accurate. But
journalists have contributed to the public’s distrust by making mistakes, f ailing to
put events into context and ignoring important points of view. In a few instances,
reporters have made up stories, quotations and sources. Although journalists
who do this are fired when they are discovered, their actions taint the entire
profession.
Dealing with public distrust is a challenge that young journalists will have
to confront. And the distrusts probably will linger for many years. No simple
solution exists. The best course is to concentrate on presenting the news as thor-
oughly, accurately and fairly as possible. Cultivating two traits can help journal-
ists achieve those goals:
Being engaged in the world means reporters have a high degree of curiosity
about their beats and life in general and they feel empathy for the subjects of their
stories. Curiosity helps reporters see story ideas in almost everything around
them and develop the stories assigned to them:
●● Many communities have charter schools, which are supported with tax
money but exempt from some of the requirements placed on public schools.
PREFACE xxi
These are just a few examples of the kinds of questions and stories journalists can
generate if they are curious. Reporters must constantly ask about the details of
their beats, even when they have no expectation the answers will lead to stories.
No reporter can predict what tidbit of information may help unravel a great story.
Even the information that yields no story might help the journalist understand
and explain events to an audience.
Being engaged also means having empathy for the sources and subjects of
news stories. People in the news often confront highly emotional situations. They
may be victims of crime or the relatives of a victim; they may have lost loved
ones in a plane crash; they may be athletes who have just suffered a defeat; or
they may be community residents worried about how a proposed development
might affect their lives and their property. A story about a knife attack by a
male employee on a female supervisor is not just an antiseptic crime story or an
exercise in deductive logic. It is a story about anger, frustration, betrayal, terror
and humiliation. A reporter who cannot empathize with the people involved
cannot truly u nderstand their experiences or tell their stories.
The ability to empathize does not require reporters to abandon objectivity
and impartiality. Empathy differs from sympathy. Sympathy requires one to
have the same feelings as another or to achieve a mutual understanding with
another. Empathy involves projecting one’s personality into that of another to
understand the other person better. Journalists who have empathy for others
can u nderstand them without embracing or approving their emotions. E mpathy
is consistent with objectivity; it also is indispensable for producing a truly
objective and thorough story. If reporters cannot understand the emotional
states of the people they write about or assess the emotional changes events
inflict on sources, they will fail to report the full story.
Curiosity and empathy enable reporters to get the who, what, when, where,
why and how of a story. Putting those elements into a coherent, interesting and
readable story requires that journalists be articulate, which combines at least two
skills. One is the ability to use words effectively, to select the appropriate words
and use them correctly and to arrange them in sentences that are grammatically
correct and properly punctuated. The other skill is the ability to organize the ele-
ments of the story—the facts, the quotations and the anecdotes—in a manner that
is captivating, informative and dramatic.
xxii Preface
Reporters who understand grammar and diction can construct sentences that
are clear and precise. The following sentences contain the same words but mean
different things, simply because one word is in a different location:
A skillful writer understands that in the first sentence, “only” limits whom she
kissed, and in the second sentence, it limits where she kissed.
A skillful writer also knows that one of these sentences accuses the subject of
a crime:
●● Foremost is the addition of a workbook separate from the textbook. The textbook
still contains exercises for students, but the addition of the workbook has allowed
us to expand the number of exercises from which instructors may choose.
PREFACE xxiii
●● For the past two editions, the book contained a separate chapter on the prac-
tice of digital journalism. Because all journalists now need skills in preparing
digital content, this information has been spread throughout the textbook.
The chapter on visual journalism, which was new with the last edition, has
been retained (Chapter 14).
●● The summary of Associated Press style has been returned to the textbook as
Appendix B. Students can now find and refer to the summary quickly and easily.
●● The book contains many visual elements, including full-color photographs
and colorful graphics. New visuals and expanded captions reflect more recent
events and correspond to and supplement the text.
●● Many of the sidebars from the previous edition have been reorganized into two
new boxes, “Hot Tip” and “From the News.” These boxes provide students with
important do’s and don’ts and examples from specific news stories, respectively.
●● The text includes many new examples on events that current and future stu-
dents will likely remember. These include the election of Donald J. Trump
as president, the controversy over the use of lethal force by police against
minority citizens, and protests by athletes against such police killings.
Reporter’s Guides
Nearly every chapter ends with a reporter’s guide (e.g., “Reporter’s Guide to
Accuracy” in Chapter 2) that summarizes the major points covered in the chapter
and helps students organize their writing assignments and make sure they are
including all important information.
Flexibility
“Writing and Reporting for the Media” is flexible. Teachers can assign the chap-
ters in almost any order. Moreover, the book and workbook provide enough exer-
cises that instructors can assign their favorites and then assign extra exercises for
students who need more help. Some teachers use the book for two semesters: for
basic and advanced reporting classes. There are enough exercises for both terms.
The book can be used in general media writing classes and those specific to
newswriting and reporting. Still, those who prefer the book’s traditional empha-
sis on the print media can assign the chapters on public relations and writing for
broadcast media as optional readings.
Hundreds of Examples
The text contains hundreds of examples from the work of students and pro-
fessionals. Each new topic or discussion of errors typically includes examples.
Students are also shown how to avoid or correct errors.
xxiv Preface
Instructor’s Manual
The authors provide a detailed Instructor’s Manual that includes ideas and recom-
mendations and discusses accuracy, grades, suggested policies and assignments.
These sections are followed by sample course outlines and lists of the exercises
that contain ethical dilemmas and sexist remarks. The manual also includes tests
covering AP style, vocabulary, attribution and spelling.
Practical Approach
Like previous editions, the 12th edition is concrete, not abstract or theoretical.
Its tone is practical and realistic. Its language is clear, concise, simple and direct.
Because of the book’s realism, students will encounter the types of problems and
assignments they are likely to find after they graduate and begin entry-level jobs
with the media.
Pro Challenge
A few exercises in the chapters about leads and the body of news stories have
been completed by professional journalists. With these exercises, students can
compare their work to that of the professionals.
A Note of Thanks
Journalists are wonderful people: enthusiastic, interesting and helpful. While
working on this book, we wrote to dozens of them. Reporters, photographers and
editors from Portland to Philadelphia, from Miami to New York, answered our
letters and provided advice and samples of their work.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
clergy cry out against me as a latitudinarian, and look upon me for so
doing, as the bigotted Jews did on Peter, for going unto the
uncircumcised Gentiles; though I say as he did, “Can any man forbid
me to converse with and communicate with those who have received
the Holy Ghost as well as we?” Are not these notorious matters of
fact? And how then can this author insinuate, that these itinerants tell
people, that they neither are, nor can be christians without adhering
to their discipline?
But our Author, it seems, looks upon what they call success, in a
different light, and therefore, in this 9th Query, further asks, “How it
can be reconciled to christian humility, prudence, or charity, to
indulge their own notions to such a degree, as to perplex, unhinge,
terrify, and distract the minds of multitudes of people, who have lived
from their infancy under a gospel ministry, and in the regular
exercise of a gospel worship; and all this, by persuading them, that
they have never yet heard the true gospel, nor been instructed in the
true way of salvation before.” To prove this particular part of the
Query, he refers to passages which my Lord of London was pleased
to extract out of my third Journal some years ago, such as, “I offered
Jesus Christ freely to them;—I think Wales is excellently well
prepared for the gospel of Christ;—Received news of the wonderful
progress of the gospel in Yorkshire, under the ministry of my dear
brother Ingham;—I was refreshed by a great packet of letters, giving
me an account of the success of the gospel;—A most comfortable
packet of letters, giving me an account of the success of the gospel.”
But how do all these passages, my Lords, put all together, afford the
least shadow of a proof of what this Author here lays to these
itinerants charge? Or how can offering Christ freely, and hearing
and writing of the success of the gospel, be interpreted as
perplexing, unhinging, terrifying, and distracting the minds of
multitudes of people, &c.? Is not this, my Lords, like the other proofs
he brings against these itinerants in some other respects? And may I
not venture to affirm now, whatever I did some years ago, that if the
Right Reverend the Bishops, and Reverend the Clergy, hold the
same principles with this anonymous Author, then the generality of
the poor people of England, however regular they may have been
from their infancy in the exercise of a gospel worship, never yet lived
under a gospel ministry, have never yet heard the true gospel, or
been instructed in the true way of salvation. For how can that be,
when the fundamental doctrine of the gospel, I mean justification by
faith alone in the sight of God, must be necessarily every where
preached down? Does not Luther call this, Articulus stantis aut
cadentis ecclesiæ? And is there any thing, my Lords, so very
irreconcilable to christian humility, prudence, or charity, for a few
young heads, who do hold this doctrine, (seeing those who seem
pillars, and are the aged heads of the church, are so much out of
order) to venture out and preach this doctrine to as great multitudes
of people as will give them the hearing? And supposing some of
these multitudes should be unhinged, terrified, distracted, or
disturbed a little, is it not better they should be thus unhinged from
off their false foundation here, than by building upon their own works,
and going about to establish a righteousness of their own, endanger
their eternal salvation hereafter?
However unintelligible the latter part of this Query may be, does
not the former part of it seem to imply, that these itinerants found the
assurance of the gospel new-birth on this sudden and instantaneous
change wrought on their hearers under their sermons, exclusive of a
gradual improvement in grace and goodness afterwards! But is not
this mere slander? For however they may humbly hope, that
Sinners, when deeply impressed, may be suddenly and effectually
wrought upon, yet how can it be proved that they reckon them real
converts, till they see them bring forth the fruits of the Spirit, in doing
justly, loving mercy, and walking humbly with their God? Or if this
was not the case, does not the author himself, if he holds baptismal
regeneration, found his comfort on the doctrine of a sudden and
instantaneous change? And do not the greatest part of the poor
souls now in England, go on secure that they shall be eternally
happy, and yet have no better foundation of comfort, and assurance
of a gospel new-birth, than that which is founded on the doctrine of a
sudden and instantaneous change wrought upon them in baptism?
Is not our Author, my Lords, also in this Query, guilty of another
egregious mistake! For the foundation of comfort which these
itinerants lay and depend on is, the compleat and all-sufficient
righteousness of Jesus, and the new birth or change wrought in the
heart, is by them looked upon only as an evidence that the persons
thus changed, have indeed gotten a foundation on this rock of ages,
and consequently a sure and certain hope of a resurrection to
eternal life. And is not all this, my Lords, easily distinguished from
fancy and imagination? And does not our Author lead people to a
wrong foundation for comfort, by directing them to look for it from “a
gradual improvement in grace and goodness?” For, what says the
Apostle, 1 Corinthians iii. 11. “Other foundation can no man lay than
that is laid, which is Christ Jesus,”—“who (as he speaks in the first
chapter of the same epistle, verse 30.) is made unto us of God,
wisdom, righteousness, sanctification and redemption?”
What rules the Author of the Whole Duty of Man may have laid
down to keep recreations of all kinds within the bounds of innocence,
it may be needless here to enquire. Is it not sufficient, my Lords, to
mention, that the holy scriptures (wherein the whole duty of man,
and that too in respect both to faith and practice, is fully and really
taught) lay down one golden universal rule for recreations and every
thing else, that “Whether we eat or drink, or whatsoever we do, we
must do all to the glory of God?” Whatever recreations people take
to the glory of God, these itinerants, my Lords, think are quite
allowable: but if they are made use of meerly for self-pleasing, and
not to God’s glory, nor to fit us for his service, they do affirm, that all
such recreations neither are nor can be innocent. And if the Author
of the Whole Duty of Man, or any other Author whatsoever, hath set
any other bounds, or fixed any other rule, however fairly he may
have considered the frame of human nature, is it not evident, that he
has not fairly considered the frame and nature of true christianity?
For does not that, my Lords, turn our whole lives into one continued
sacrifice to God? And if we fairly consider the frame of human
nature, how weak and frail it is, and how easily diverted from
pursuing our one great end, are not those the greatest friends to
religion, who caution people against leading themselves into
temptations, or making use of any recreation that may put them out
of a spiritual frame, and unfit them for the service of God? Is this
going any further than the Apostle did, who so strictly cautions
christians “not to grieve the Spirit of God, whereby they are sealed
to the day of redemption?”
Our Author, under this head, has referred to a passage out of one
of my Journals, wherein I gave an account of my being in some
polite company at Maryland, who were disposed to cards; and also a
passage out of my letter from New-Brunswick, occasioned, if I
mistake not, by meeting a man who thought it allowable to play at
cards in the Christmas holidays, from the liberty given him by the
Author of the Whole Duty of Man. And will our Author allow playing
at cards to be a lawful recreation for a christian? Is this one of the
recreations of all kinds which may be kept within the bounds of
innocence? Is it not a kind of casting lots? Has it not the appearance
of evil? Will he not hear the church? And what says the 75th canon?
“No ecclesiastical person shall at any time, other than for their
honest necessities, resort to any taverns or alehouses, neither shall
they board or lodge in any such places. Furthermore, they shall not
give themselves to any base or servile labour, or to drinking or riot,
spending their time idly by day or by night, playing at dice, cards, or
tables, or any other unlawful game: but at all times convenient, they
shall hear or read somewhat of the holy scriptures, or shall occupy
themselves with some other honest study or exercise, always doing
the things which shall appertain to honesty, and endeavouring to
profit the church of God, having always in mind that they ought to
excel all others in purity of life, and should be examples to the
people to live well and christianly, under pain of ecclesiastical
censures to be inflicted with severity, according to the qualities of
their offences.” An excellent canon this! And may I not argue from it
thus? Either this canon is founded upon the word of God, or it is not:
if it be not, why is it not abrogated? if it be, why is it not put in
practice? Why do the clergy encourage frequenting of taverns,
alehouses, and gaming by their own example? Are not such
practices in this canon supposed to be quite contrary to the purity of
life and excellency of example which may be justly required from
them? And if such things are unseemly in a clergyman, are they not
in a degree equally unseemly in laymen, whose privilege as well as
duty it is, to be “holy in all manner of conversation and godliness,”
and who are universally commanded “to shine as lights in the world
amidst a crooked and perverse generation?”
George Whitefield.
S O ME
R E M A R KS
Upon a late
Delivered by
L i t c h f i e l d and C o v e n t r y.
On Board the Wilmington, Captain Darling,
September 20, 1744.
Reverend Brethren,
A S you profess to know the scriptures, I need not inform you, that
the character of young Elihu shines in the 32d chapter of the
book of Job with a superior lustre, above that of his other three
friends who came to converse with him. The humility and modesty
wherewith he first addresses himself to them is peculiarly amiable. “I
am young, says he, and ye are very old, wherefore I was afraid, and
durst not shew you my opinion. I said, Days should speak, and
multitude of years should teach wisdom.” But knowing by
experience, that “great men are not always wise, neither do the aged
understand judgment, he said, Hearken unto me, and I also will
shew my opinion.” And that they might not censure him for rashness
in speaking, he assures them, verses 11, and 12. that he had well
weighed the matter before he broke silence. “Behold, I waited for
your words; I gave ear to your reasons, whilst you searched out what
to say. Yea, I attended unto you; and behold there was none of you
that convinced Job, or that answered his words.” And that they might
not be offended at his plain speaking, or expect that he would be
over-awed from delivering his soul, by their superiority in age,
learning, or circumstances of life, in the two last verses of the
chapter, he boldly, but honestly tells them what they were to expect
from him. “Let me not, I pray you, accept any man’s person, neither
let me give flattering titles unto man, for I know not to give flattering
titles: In so doing my Maker would soon take me away.” And it is very
remarkable, that though we are told this young man’s wrath was
kindled against Job and his three friends, verses 2 and 3. and
though (as it appears from the ensuing chapters) he spoke very
close and cutting things, yet at the end of the book, we find no blame
laid on him by the great heart-searching God; whereas the other
three are severely reproved, and commanded to apply to Job for the
benefit of his prayers.
But does not his Lordship by intimating, that this promise of our
Lord was wholly compleated on the day of Pentecost, prove too
much? for does it not then follow, that no one after the day of
Pentecost was to expect the Holy Ghost to bring all things to their
remembrance, to teach them all things, and shew them things to
come? How then could this promise be fulfilled in the apostle Paul,
who was converted some time after? or how could this remain in the
primitive church in the inspired persons, or abide with the church for
ever to the end of the world? And supposing the apostle Peter does
make an application of the prophecy of Joel to the miraculous
effusion of the Spirit on the day of Pentecost, Acts the 2d, verses
16th, 17th, &c. does it therefore follow, that this promise of our
Saviour extends no farther than that day? Does he any where
intimate any such thing through his whole discourse? Or is it any
new thing for prophecies to have several fulfilments? Is not that
prophecy, “Out of Egypt have I called my son,” which was originally
spoken concerning God’s Israel, applied by the evangelist Matthew,
chapter 2d. verse 15th, to the Son of God himself? And therefore
granting that this promise was in an extraordinary degree fulfilled in
the day of Pentecost, how does it follow, that it is not now, and will be
in an ordinary way, fulfilling to the end of the world? And
consequently, may not this promise of our Lord be pleaded by all his
disciples, for the indwelling of his blessed Spirit, and his inward
teaching, by the instrumentality of his revealed will, now as well as
formerly (especially since his Lordship, page 15th, clears us from
pretending to the operations of the miraculous kind) without being
censured for so doing as modern enthusiasts.
But this inward teaching and indwelling of the Spirit, his Lordship
will by no means allow even the primitive christians to have had in
common, and therefore, page 35th (which I come to next, for
method’s sake) he comments upon another remarkable scripture,
that, in his Lordship’s opinion, ‘has been misapplied to later ages,
and indeed to the present times, by several enthusiasts, but was
really peculiar to the times of the apostles.’ It occurs, says his
Lordship, page ibid. in the first epistle of St. John, chapter ii. verse
20th, 27th. “But ye have an unction from the Holy One, and ye know
all things. But the anointing which ye have received of him, abideth
in you: but as the same anointing teacheth you all things, and is
truth, and is no lie; and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in
him.”
This unction from the Holy One, and this anointing, his Lordship,
in five or six pages, labours to prove was some extraordinary gift
residing in some particular inspired persons, and not in the believers
in general to whom the apostle wrote. But with what shadow of
argument does his Lordship reason thus? For though it be certain
(as his Lordship intimates page 37th) “that there were several such
inspired teachers among the first christians, who were endowed with
various gifts of the Spirit, and among them with the gift of prayer, and
preaching, and revelation of the true sense of the prophetical parts of
the Old Testament;” yet how does it appear, that these inspired
teachers are the particular persons referred to by the Apostle in this
passage? If that was the case, would not the epistle itself more
properly have been directed to them, as having the oversight of the
flock? Or is it not probable at least, that the Apostle would have had
something to say to them, as well as to the “little children, young
men, and fathers,” verses 12th, 13th, to whom he writes so
particularly? And is it not evident from the whole context, that this
unction from the Holy One was not an extraordinary gift residing in
any particular inspired person, but the indwelling of the Spirit,
believers in general, whereby they had an experimental proof, that
Jesus was indeed the Christ, and therefore needed not that any
man should teach them, that is, further teach them, for the Apostle
writes unto them as knowing persons, verse 12th, &c. Is not this
interpretation quite consistent with the whole scope of the Apostle in
this epistle, which was to comfort himself, and believers in general,
now so many antichrists were abroad, that (since Jesus Christ had
declared, Matthew xxiv. 24. that the elect could not be finally
deceived) they having a proof of their election by receiving this
unction from above, this indwelling of the Holy Ghost in their hearts,
were now enabled, in a way far superior to, though not entirely
exclusive of human teaching, to guard against the seducers of the
day? And consequently, may not the indwelling of the Spirit be
insisted upon now, as the privilege of all real christians, without their
being justly stiled for so doing, modern enthusiasts.