Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ebook download (Original PDF) Neurogenetics Part I (Handbook of Clinical Neurology) all chapter
ebook download (Original PDF) Neurogenetics Part I (Handbook of Clinical Neurology) all chapter
ebook download (Original PDF) Neurogenetics Part I (Handbook of Clinical Neurology) all chapter
http://ebooksecure.com/product/original-pdf-neurogenetics-part-
ii-handbook-of-clinical-neurology/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/neuroimaging-part-i-ebook-pdf/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-translational-medicine-
in-cns-drug-development-volume-29/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/progress-in-heterocyclic-
chemistry-ebook-pdf/
Critical Care Neurology Part I 1st Edition Edition
Eelco F.M. Wijdicks And Andreas H. Kramer (Eds.) -
eBook PDF
https://ebooksecure.com/download/critical-care-neurology-part-i-
ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/netter-atlas-of-human-anatomy-
classic-regional-approach-8e-mar-29-2022_0323793738_elsevier-not-
true-pdf-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/cardiology-an-integrated-
approach-human-organ-systems-dec-29-2017_007179154x_mcgraw-hill-
ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/kaufmans-clinical-neurology-for-
psychiatrists-ebook-pdf-2/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/clinical-neurology-ebook-pdf/
Foreword
These two volumes (147 and 148) on neurogenetics in the Handbook of Clinical Neurology series illustrate the enor-
mous impact that this discipline has had in the last few decades on understanding the variation that makes each of us
unique, on the diagnosis of neuropsychiatric disorders, and certainly also on basic neurobiology.
The “genetics revolution” started in 1953, when Watson and Crick published the elegant structure of our genetic
code. In 1990, Watson was appointed head of the Human Genome Project at the National Institutes of Health. Ten years
later, US President Bill Clinton announced that the first draft of the human genome was complete.
There is no doubt that the sequencing of the human genome has been a critical scientific milestone that has not only
changed the landscape of gene discovery tremendously but has also transformed our understanding of mechanisms
mediating the development, aging, and disorders of the brain. Likewise, new genetic methods, bioinformatics,
and genomic databases, which are discussed in Volume 147, have brought deeper insights into the subtle
complexities of the genetic architecture that determines plasticity and resilience of the developing and adult brain
and the risks of developing neuropsychiatric disorders.
Today, molecular genetic and genomic tests can provide a definitive diagnosis for many neurologic and psychiatric
disorders, as shown extensively in these two volumes, but they also bring new complex ethical issues. The nature-
versus-nurture discussion regarding the cause of neuropsychiatric disorders has taken on a new dimension with the
finding that environmental factors can epigenetically modulate the function of genes and influence disease
processes. The importance of animal models is discussed in various chapters, as is the major challenge for the field,
namely to bridge the gap between genes and neurotherapy.
We were very fortunate to have as volume editors three distinguished scholars: Daniel H. Geschwind of the David
Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Henry L. Paulson of the University of Michigan, and Christine Klein of the
Institute of Neurogenetics at the University of L€ubeck. They have assembled an excellent international and multidis-
ciplinary group of experts and guided them to create this comprehensive book. We are very grateful to them and to all
the contributors.
As always, it is a pleasure to thank Elsevier, our publisher—and in particular Michael Parkinson in Scotland,
and Mara Conner, Nikki Levy, and Kristi Anderson in San Diego—for their unfailing and expert assistance in the devel-
opment and production of this volume.
Michael J. Aminoff
François Boller
Dick F. Swaab
This page intentionally left blank
Preface
We are grateful for the opportunity to edit these two neurogenetics volumes in the Handbook of Clinical Neurology
series. Since the publication of the Neurogenetics Directory as part of the series more than three decades ago, extraor-
dinary advances have occurred in understanding the pathophysiology of neurologic disorders, many of them fueled by
genetics and genomics. Prior to the early 1990s, gene hunting in neurogenetics was complicated by the lack of a human
genome roadmap. With the exception of metabolic disorders and chromosomal anomalies, few, if any, mutations caus-
ing rare Mendelian neurologic disorders or genetic variants contributing to the risk of developing common disorders
were known. Once a first-generation genome map was in hand, improvements in technology and statistical methods
and the development of large-scale collaborative studies created extraordinary momentum that continues to propel
genetic discoveries. Starting with identification of rare mutations causing neurodegenerative syndromes, such as spinal
bulbar muscular atrophy, Huntington disease, and ataxias, which were caused by triplet repeat expansions, the field has
progressed through linkage analysis and identification of mutations causing rare Mendelian forms of Alzheimer disease
or neurodevelopmental disorders, to identifying risk variants for more common disorders, such as migraine, multiple
sclerosis, autism spectrum disorder, and Alzheimer disease using genomewide association studies. These studies have
moved neurology beyond a gold standard consisting of pathologic descriptions of disease in postmortem tissues from
the central and peripheral nervous systems towards defining the root causes of disease, providing an unprecedented
opportunity to interrupt the mechanistic chains of events that underlie disease susceptibility. The 53 chapters in these
two neurogenetics volumes represent the frontier of neurogenetics and have been chosen to embody this promise.
The first eight chapters introduce basic concepts in genetics and genomics, ranging from epigenetics and bioinfor-
matics, to genetic testing in clinical practice, and to ethical issues. Progress has been so remarkable that a number of
these chapters could not even have been conceived of 30 years ago. Next we highlight some recurring themes, such as
triplet repeats, mitochondrial disorders, and polyglutamine disorders. Following this, the sections cover disease entities
such as movement disorders, neurodevelopmental disorders, dementias, paroxysmal disorders, neuromuscular disor-
ders, diseases of white matter and demyelination, cerebrovascular disorders, major adult psychiatric disorders (addic-
tion and obsessive compulsive disorder), and cancer and phakomatoses.
Since genetic factors influence virtually every neurologic condition, we have chosen to include a broad range of
topics, to emphasize key themes that are emerging in neurogenetics. Technology is an obvious driver, and changes
such as the advent of whole-exome sequencing (WES) as a clinical test make discovery of new genetic causes of disease
a part of everyday clinical diagnostics. Another theme is the overlap between neurology and psychiatry, where we hope
that coverage of certain representative psychiatric disorders illustrates the progress and the challenges in this field. In
some cases, genetics is actually changing diagnostic boundaries, leading to questions about pathology, which in many
cases has been considered the gold standard of definitive clinical diagnosis. One striking example is Friedreich ataxia,
originally defined as a disorder of early childhood, where more mild, adult-onset cases are now frequently identified
through genetic testing. Similarly, in Parkinson disease, patients with several genetic forms that cause classic clinical
parkinsonism may lack synuclein deposition, challenging the gold-standard pathologic diagnosis. In other conditions,
genetic progress has led to animal and cell models, which provide promise for mechanistic understanding. With this
wealth of advances come substantial challenges, most prominently in the largely unexplored territory of connecting
genetic variation through multiple levels of function, ranging from changes in chromatin, RNA expression, and protein
modifications, to cell biologic and network physiologic function and behavior. On a purely genetic level, the ability to
obtain whole-genome sequences (WGS) from substantial patient cohorts presents the challenge of interpreting the vast
amount of noncoding sequence queried by this approach, but whose function is largely unknown.
Now we live in an era when progress in creating truly high-performance computing and developments in technology
promise a US$100 genome, perhaps within the next 5 years. Notwithstanding the enormous bioinformatic and com-
putational challenges and costs, this means that the majority of patients are likely to have genetic information included
x PREFACE
as part of their medical record within the next decade. WES and WGS are coming into clinical practice: the diagnostic
rate for WES in undiagnosed disorders can be as high as 50% in certain cardiac condtions, averages around 30% for
most childhood neurologic disorders, including autism spectrum disorder, and is more than 20% for patients with a
wide range of sporadic ataxias but lacking a family history. Even at the lower end of the diagnostic rate, WES is
the most powerful single diagnostic test available for a wide range of previously undiagnosed disorders (see Chapter 2),
and genetic testing is increasingly replacing other diagnostic laboratory tests in several areas of neurology. Similarly,
genetic association studies have yielded multiple new directions in common diseases such as Alzheimer disease and
multiple sclerosis. It is clear that power in such studies is related to numbers, and that as we approach large enough
sample sizes, we will be able to understand the majority of common and rare genetic risks for all neurologic disorders.
So, we expect that soon we will know over 50% of the population risk for most common neurologic and psychiatric
disorders, and will base genetic-driven treatments for certain conditions on this knowledge. Such advances will give
rise to genetically driven precision healthcare, where diagnosis, prevention, prognosis, and treatment are tailored to the
individual patient. In parallel with advances in clinical oncology, we have reached the exciting stage of pioneering
genetic cause-directed molecular therapies for Duchenne muscular dystrophy and spinal muscular atrophy type 1.
Lastly, the degree and the precision of genetic and genomic data currently exceed that of systematically collected
(and quality-controlled) phenotypic information, which constitutes an increasingly important knowledge gap if we
are to effectively exploit all of the available (and newly generated) genetic data and use it to predict clinical outcomes.
In this regard, our current electronic health records will likely not be sufficient, and new, high-throughput methods of
phenotypic data collection and analysis will be needed.
Daniel H. Geschwind
Henry L. Paulson
Christine Klein
Contributors
6. Pharmacogenetics
J.R. Bishop (Minneapolis, United States) 59
Index I-1
Contents of Part II
Foreword vii
Preface ix
Contributors xi
SECTION V Dementias
42. Neuropathy
C. Pisciotta and M.E. Shy (Iowa City, United States) 653
47. CADASIL
M.M. Wang (Ann Arbor, United States) 733
Index I-1
This page intentionally left blank
Section I
Chapter 1
Abstract
Neurogenetic diseases are surprisingly common. This chapter reviews a systematic approach to the eval-
uation of a patient thought to have such a disease. The emphasis is on first recognizing potential clues to the
diagnosis contained in the family history and presentation of symptoms. Ataxia, neuropathy, muscle weak-
ness, dementia, epilepsy, and cognitive delay are all “reservoirs” of neurogenetic disease. A high index of
suspicion for genetic causes and a thoughtful evaluation of simplex (sporadic) cases is often necessary.
Then the physician can proceed to the differential diagnosis, genetic testing, and genetic counseling.
A team approach including a genetic counselor is usually the best strategy.
The clinical practice of neurogenetics is complex, chal- compelling sign of a genetic disorder. However, there are
lenging, and rewarding, and becoming increasingly rel- two major exceptions to finding a positive family history.
evant with advances in genetic testing and diagnosis. The first is that isolated or sporadic cases without a pos-
This chapter will focus on eight aspects of clinical neu- itive family history can still be genetic. The various
rogenetics: (1) factors suggesting the presence of a explanations for sporadic cases of genetic disease are
genetic disease; (2) nonspecific diagnoses that may be explained later in this chapter. The second exception is
masking neurogenetic diseases; (3) the importance of that familial disorders are not necessarily genetic. For
family history; (4) the assessment of sporadic cases; example, family members sharing the same environment
(5) genetic counseling; (6) genetic testing; (7) available may be affected with the same nongenetic acquired dis-
information resources; and (8) integration of the clinical ease (such as neuropathy or ataxia), because of common
neurogenetic strategy. (A discussion of this approach has exposure to infectious or toxic agents. Another example
appeared previously, in Bird, 2002.) is the presence of older family members affected with a
prevalent age-related condition such as Alzheimer dis-
ease or cataracts. It is important to remember that,
FACTORS SUGGESTING A
although a positive family history is a strong sign of a
NEUROGENETIC DISORDER
genetic disease, familial disorders are not always genetic
Table 1.1 highlights clues indicating an increased prob- and genetic disorders are not always familial.
ability that a patient may have a neurogenetic disorder. Probably the next most important clue suggesting a
Not surprisingly, first and foremost is the presence of a genetic disorder is a constellation of signs and symptoms
positive family history. By nature, genetic diseases are suggesting a known genetic syndrome. This is common
usually inherited. Thus it is typical to observe other sense, but often requires a detailed knowledge of, and
affected family members. This is true of all patterns of memory for, syndromic identification. For example,
inheritance, including autosomal-dominant, autosomal- atypical facial “acne” and a seizure disorder suggest
recessive, X-linked, and mitochondrial. Therefore, a pos- tuberous sclerosis, progressive ataxia with loss of
itive family history of a similarly affected individual is a reflexes suggests Friedreich ataxia, white-matter disease
*Correspondence to: Thomas D. Bird, MD, Puget Sound Health Care System, S-182-GRECC, 1660 South Columbian Way, Seattle
WA 98108, United States. Tel: +1-206-764-2308, Fax: +1-206-764-2569, E-mail: tomnroz@u.washington.edu
4 T.D. BIRD AND C.O. SMITH
Table 1.1 family history of a similarly affected individual should
Clues to the presence of a neurogenetic disease initiate a further search for a more specific genetic cause.
We have seen patients with a diagnosis of cerebral palsy
● Positive family history actually discovered to have familial spastic paraplegia,
● Similarity to a known genetic syndrome ataxia telangiectasia, or Pelizaeus–Merzbacher disease.
● Chronic, progressive clinical course Patients with nonspecific dementia have been found to
● Consanguinity
have genetic forms of Alzheimer disease, Creutzfeldt–
● Increased frequency in a specific ethnic group
Jacob disease, and frontotemporal dementia. Patients
with a diagnosis of MS have been rediagnosed with cere-
bral autosomal-dominant arteriopathy with subcortical
Table 1.2 infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) and a
Diagnostic reservoirs of neurogenetic diseases variety of genetic leukodystrophies. Persons with move-
ment disorders of uncertain cause have been found to
● Cerebral palsy
●
have Huntington disease, hereditary ataxias, and genetic
Mental retardation
● Epilepsy forms of dystonia. More detailed evaluation of
● Movement disorders patients with unexplained epilepsy has uncovered cases
● Ataxias of myoclonic epilepsy with ragged red fibers and
● Dementias autosomal-recessive myoclonic epilepsy. Many patients
● Atypical multiple sclerosis with Charcot–Marie–Tooth (CMT) disease have a diag-
● Peripheral neuropathy nosis of peripheral neuropathy without recognition of its
genetic nature.
with hyperactive tendon reflexes in a male suggest adre- IMPORTANCE OF FAMILY HISTORY
noleukodystrophy or Pelizaeus–Merzbacher disease, and
muscle weakness associated with muscle cramps and cat- Because a positive family history is such an important
aracts suggests myotonic dystrophy. element in the diagnosis of neurogenetic disorders it is
Other factors suggesting a genetic disease are less critical to pay careful attention to the family story and
clear but often helpful. For example, most genetic dis- to record it appropriately for future reference (Bennett,
eases have a slow, subtle onset and prolonged, 2009). The clinician should always inquire about the
chronic course. Many have onset in childhood, although health of siblings, parents, and children. If clues begin
it is not uncommon to have a later onset, especially to accumulate that a genetic disease may be present, then
with autosomal-dominant conditions. Consanguinity (mat- one inquires about more distant relatives such as grand-
ings between blood relatives) is a clue to autosomal- parents, aunts, uncles, and cousins. Not only is it impor-
recessive disorders. Also, certain diseases are more tant to inquire about numerous family members, but the
common in specific ethnic groups. Examples would be types of questions need to be carefully tailored to the
Tay–Sachs disease in Eastern European (Ashkenazi) differential diagnosis. For example, if considering myo-
Jews, Unverricht–Lundborg myoclonic epilepsy in Finns, tonic muscular dystrophy, you would ask about other
dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy in Japanese, spino- family members with muscle weakness, cardiac arrhyth-
cerebellar ataxia type 3 in Portuguese, and cerebral mias, baldness, diabetes, developmental delay, or cata-
cavernous malformations or spinocerebellar ataxia type ract. If considering CMT neuropathy the questions
10 in Mexicans. would include difficulty walking, high arched feet,
braces, or foot surgery. Concern about the diagnosis of
neurofibromatosis type 1 would initiate questions about
NONSPECIFIC CATEGORIES MASKING
skin spots and skin lumps and the possibility of tuberous
NEUROGENETIC DISEASES
sclerosis would trigger questions about intellectual dis-
Certain nonspecific diagnostic categories often harbor ability, seizures, skin lesions, and kidney disease.
patients with neurogenetic diseases and can be viewed A broad knowledge of the various possible syndromes
as “reservoirs” where neurogenetic patients may be is critical because nonobvious questions may become
“hiding.” Several of these categories are listed in important: for example, the association of berry aneu-
Table 1.2. These categories are quite general and such rysm with autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney dis-
diagnoses may indicate a lack of thorough diagnostic ease, diabetes and gallbladder disease with myotonic
evaluation when applied to individual patients. This is dystrophy, schizophrenia with Huntington disease,
particularly true of cerebral palsy, epilepsy, intellectual and frontotemporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral
disability, and multiple sclerosis (MS). Certainly, any sclerosis in families with repeat expansions in the
patient with one of these diagnoses and with a positive C9ORF72 gene.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
TRANSCRIBER’S NOTES:
Obvious typographical errors have been corrected.
Inconsistencies in hyphenation have been
standardized.
Archaic or variant spelling has been retained.
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE HISTORY
OF COMPANY B, 311TH INFANTRY IN THE WORLD WAR ***
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside
the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to
the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying,
displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works
based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The
Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright
status of any work in any country other than the United States.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form,
including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if
you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project
Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or
other format used in the official version posted on the official
Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at
no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a
means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other
form. Any alternate format must include the full Project
Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.