Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ebook download Rosen's Emergency Medicine: Concepts and Clinical Practice 9th Edition Ron M. Walls - eBook PDF all chapter
ebook download Rosen's Emergency Medicine: Concepts and Clinical Practice 9th Edition Ron M. Walls - eBook PDF all chapter
https://ebooksecure.com/download/clinical-practice-manual-for-
pulmonary-and-critical-care-medicine-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/kumar-and-clarks-clinical-
medicine-chapter-12-only-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/the-practice-of-clinical-
echocardiography-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/whitcup-and-nussenblatts-
uveitis-fundamentals-and-clinical-practice-ebook-pdf/
Atlas of Emergency Medicine 4th Edition Kevin Knoop -
eBook PDF
https://ebooksecure.com/download/atlas-of-emergency-medicine-4th-
edition-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/critical-care-emergency-
medicine-ebook-pdf/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/behavioral-medicine-a-guide-for-
clinical-practice-ebook-pdf/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-fire-and-emergency-
services-instructor-principles-and-practice-3rd-edition/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/tintinallis-emergency-medicine-
manual-ebook-pdf/
ROSEN’S
EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Concepts and Clinical Practice
9th Edition
Rosen’s
Emergency Medicine
Concepts and Clinical Practice
Editor-in-Chief
Ron M. Walls, MD
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Brigham
Health; Neskey Family Professor of Emergency Medicine, Harvard
Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Senior Editors
Robert S. Hockberger, MD Marianne Gausche-Hill, MD, FACEP, FAAP, FAEMS
Emeritus Professor of Emergency Medicine, David Geffen School Medical Director, Los Angeles County EMS Agency; Professor
of Medicine at UCLA; Chair Emeritus, Department of Emergency of Clinical Medicine and Pediatrics, David Geffen School of
Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California Medicine at UCLA; EMS Fellowship Director, Department of
Emergency Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance,
California
Editors
Katherine Bakes, MD Amy H. Kaji, MD, PhD
Associate Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Associate Professor, Emergency Medicine, David Geffen School of
University of Colorado School of Medicine; Clinical Director Medicine at UCLA; Vice Chair of Academic Affairs, Department
of Community Affairs, Director, At-Risk Intervention and of Emergency Medicine, Harbor-UCLA, Los Angeles, California
Mentoring (AIM), Denver Health; Denver, Colorado
Michael VanRooyen, MD, MPH
Jill Marjorie Baren, MD, MBE, FACEP, FAAP Chairman, Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Professor and Chair, Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical
Medicine; Chief, Emergency Services, University of Pennsylvania School; Boston, Massachusetts; Director, Harvard Humanitarian
Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Initiative, Harvard University, Cambrige, Massachusetts
Timothy B. Erickson, MD, FACEP, FACMT, FAACT Richard D. Zane, MD, FAAEM
Chief, Division of Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency The George B. Boedecker Professor and Chair, Department of
Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Harvard Medical Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine;
School, Boston, Massachusetts; Faculty, Harvard Humanitarian Executive Director, Emergency Services, University of Colorado
Initiative, Cambridge, Massachusetts Health, Aurora, Colorado
Andy S. Jagoda, MD
Professor and Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn
School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; Professor and Chair,
Emergency Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York,
New York
VOLUME 1
1600 John F. Kennedy Blvd.
Ste 1800
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2899
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or
mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without
permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the
Publisher’s permissions policies and our arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance
Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher
(other than as may be noted herein).
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden
our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment may become
necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating
and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such
information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including
parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.
With respect to any drug or pharmaceutical products identified, readers are advised to check the most
current information provided (i) on procedures featured or (ii) by the manufacturer of each product to be
administered, to verify the recommended dose or formula, the method and duration of administration,
and contraindications. It is the responsibility of practitioners, relying on their own experience and
knowledge of their patients, to make diagnoses, to determine dosages and the best treatment for each
individual patient, and to take all appropriate safety precautions.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors, assume
any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability,
negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas
contained in the material herein.
Previous editions copyrighted 2014, 2010, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1992, 1988, and 1983.
Names: Walls, Ron M., editor. | Hockberger, Robert S., editor. | Gausche-Hill, Marianne,
editor.
Title: Rosen’s emergency medicine : concepts and clinical practice / [edited by] Ron M.
Walls, Robert S. Hockberger, Marianne Gausche-Hill.
Other titles: Emergency medicine
Description: Ninth edition. | Philadelphia, PA : Elsevier, [2018] | Includes bibliographical
references and index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2016055133 | ISBN 9780323354790 (hardcover : alk. paper) | ISBN
9789996111693 (v. 1: hardcover : alk. paper) | ISBN 9996111695 (v. 1: hardcover : alk.
paper) | ISBN 9789996111631 (v. 2 : hardcover : alk. paper) | ISBN 9996111636 (v. 2:
hardcover : alk. paper)
Subjects: | MESH: Emergencies | Emergency Medicine
Classification: LCC RC86.7 | NLM WB 105 | DDC 616.02/5—dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016055133
Printed in China
v
Contributors
Gallane Abraham, MD Aaron N. Barksdale, MD
Assistant Professor, Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Assistant Professor, Emergency Medicine, University of
Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
vii
viii Contributors
Timothy B. Erickson, MD, FACEP, FACMT, FAACT Jeffrey M. Goodloe, MD, NRP, FACEP
Chief, Division of Medical Toxicology, Department of Professor and EMS Section Chief, Director, Oklahoma Center
Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital; for Prehospital and Disaster Medicine Department of
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Faculty, Emergency Medicine, University of Oklahoma School of
Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Cambridge, Massachusetts Community Medicine—Tulsa; Oklahoma Medical Director,
Medical Control Board EMS System for Metropolitan
Madonna Fernández-Frackelton, MD Oklahoma City and Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma
Program Director, Emergency Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical
Center, Torrance, California; Professor of Medicine, David Eric Goralnick, MD, MS
Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California Medical Director, Emergency Preparedness, Brigham and
Women’s Healthcare; Assistant Professor, Emergency
John T. Finnell, MD, MSc Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Instructor, Department
Associate Professor of Clinical Emergency Medicine, Indiana of Health Policy and Management, Harvard TH Chan School
University, Indianapolis, Indiana of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
N. Stuart Harris, MD, MFA, FRCP Edinburgh Robert S. Hoffman, MD, FAACT, FACMT, FRCP Edinburgh
Chief, Division of Wilderness Medicine, Fellowship Director, Professor, Emergency Medicine and Medicine, New York
MGH Wilderness Medicine Fellowship, Department of University School of Medicine; Attending Physician,
Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital; Department of Emergency Medicine, Bellevue Hospital
Associate Professor, Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical Center, New York, New York
School, Boston, Massachusetts
Christopher Hogrefe, MD
Danielle Hart, MD Assistant Professor, Departments of Medicine, Emergency
Associate Program Director and Director of Simulation, Medicine, and Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University
Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Jeffrey A. Holmes, MD
Benjamin W. Hatten, MD, MPH Attending Physician, Emergency Department, Maine Medical
Assistant Professor, Emergency Medicine, University of Center, Portland, Maine
Colorado–School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado; Medical
Toxicologist, Rocky Mountain Poison and Drug Center, Jason A. Hoppe, DO
Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, Colorado Associate Professor, Emergency Medicine, University of
Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
Jag S. Heer, MD
Associate Professor of Clinical Medicine, David Geffen School Timothy Horeczko, MD, MSCR
of Medicine at University of California at Los Angeles, Los Department of Emergency Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical
Angeles, California; Attending Faculty Physician, Department Center, Torrance, California
of Emergency Medicine, Kern Medical Center, Bakersfield,
California Christopher Hoyte, MD
Fellowship Director, Associate Medical Director, Rocky
Carlton E. Heine, MD, PhD Mountain Poison and Drug Center; Director, Medical
Clinical Associate Professor, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Toxicology Clinic, Section of Medical Toxicology,
Washington State University, Spokane Academic Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado
Spokane, Washington School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado
Robert L. Wears, MD, MS, PhD Ken Zafren, MD, FAAEM, FACEP, FAWM
Professor, Emergency Medicine, University of Florida, Emergency Programs Medical Director, State of Alaska,
Jacksonville, Florida; Visiting Professor, Clinical Safety Anchorage, Alaska; Clinical Professor, Department of
Research Unit, Imperial College London, London, England Emergency Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center,
Stanford, California; Staff Emergency Physician, Alaska
Lori Weichenthal, MD Native Medical Center, Anchorage, Alaska
Professor of Clinical Emergency Medicine, Emergency Medicine,
UCSF Fresno, Fresno, California Brian J. Zink, MD
Professor and Chair, Emergency Medicine, Alpert Medical
Katherine Welker, MD, MPH School of Brown University; Physician-in-Chief, Emergency
Attending Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Medicine, Rhode Island, Newport and The Miriam Hospitals,
Diego, California; Toxicology Fellowship, Toxikon Providence, Rhode Island
Consortium, Cook County Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
Leslie S. Zun, MD, MBA
Matthew A. Wheatley, MD Professor and Chair, Emergency Medicine, Rosalind Franklin
Assistant Professor, Emergency Medicine, Emory University University of Medicine and Science-Chicago Medical School,
School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia North Chicago, Illinois; System Chair, Emergency Medicine,
Sinai Health System, Chicago, Illinois
John M. Wightman, MD, MA, FACEP
Director, Human Research Protection Program, 711th Human
Performance Wing, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-
Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio; Adjunct Professor,
Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, F. Edward
Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University,
Bethesda, Maryland; Clinical Professor, Department of
Emergency Medicine, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright
State University, Dayton, Ohio
Preface to the Ninth Edition
When we began planning for this ninth edition, we challenged make specific recommendations, and give the reader clear indica-
ourselves to make substantial and meaningful improvements to a tions of the preferred actions. This makes the book much more
book that has become the trusted standard in our field. With immediately relevant for emergency clinicians. We recognize that
broad and rapid changes occurring in health care and information emergency medicine is practiced by specialist emergency physi-
sciences, we recognized that relevance is not an accidental or cians, other physicians, residents and other trainees, and a variety
passive concept. To advance in relevance and consolidate the of nonphysician practitioners, so were careful to ensure that we
book’s position as the defining reference in our specialty, we care- are addressing all these groups with the same concise, highest
fully and deliberately undertook bold changes that we know make quality information and recommendations.
the book at once fresh, directive, and current in a way we have We revisited page counts for every chapter, adjusting alloca-
never before dared. tions where indicated, and added new chapters on several impor-
First, we created a substantially enhanced role for our editors, tant topics. We focused anew on consistency and redundancy,
one that would demand a great deal more of their time, creativity, enhancing the former and minimizing the latter. We moved
and energy. This helped us build a substantially different team some chapters to online access only, allowing us to add new topics
of editors, a perfectly balanced blend of those with great experi- of interest, such as drug therapy for older patients, and have
ence with prior editions and those who would bring new ideas provided a rich array of dynamic videos and images, especially in
and challenge our assumptions. Ron Walls was asked to serve as emergency ultrasound. We substantially expanded and reorganized
Editor-in-Chief, with Bob Hockberger in his long-standing role as the pediatric emergency medicine section, introducing dedicated
senior editor. Marianne Gausche-Hill, a highly respected academic pediatric chapters on airway management, procedural sedation,
emergency physician with service as editor on four previous and drug therapy. We introduced significant new material on
editions, stepped up to complete our senior editorial ranks. At emergencies in the pregnant woman, the patient with cancer, and
the editor level, Dr. Andy Jagoda returns and is joined by six a variety of other highly important clinical conditions. And, in
brilliant new editors drawn from academic programs from coast every possible case, we insisted on adherence to referencing and
to coast—Drs. Katherine Bakes, Jill Baren, Timothy Erickson, Amy writing requirements, a focus on relevant directive information,
Kaji, Michael VanRooyen, and Richard Zane. This dynamic and and appropriate use of prose and illustrations to provide the
innovative editorial team has dramatically redrawn our text’s perfect balance of depth, breadth, and ready accessibility.
blueprint by preserving what has served our readers the best, We are enormously proud of the result, a different, more read-
such as well-written discussions of the pathophysiologic basis of able “Rosen,” preserving the gravitas earned over 30 years as the
illness and injury, while moving in entirely new directions in most important book in our specialty while embracing the
providing pithy, clear, and succinct recommendations for diagno- modern era of emergency medicine practice and research and an
sis and treatment. entirely new generation of learners and practitioners. For those
We collectively determined that all references prior to 2010 who have owned prior editions, we appreciate your loyalty over
have been sufficiently long in the public domain that they no so many years and hope to reward it with a significantly improved
longer warrant citation. The infrequent exception to this is for and useful companion for your continuing learning and practice
guidelines that were issued in 2007 or later and have not been of this great specialty. For our newer readers, welcome, and thank
reissued or supplanted since. Strict adherence to our referenc- you for inspiring us to make significant changes to an iconic and
ing policy required authors to diligently provide well-researched timeless part of our academic heritage.
and detailed updates to their chapter content, based on only the
most recent and relevant medical literature. In cases in which Ron M. Walls
the literature is controversial or unclear, we have used the Robert S. Hockberger
combined experience and expertise of our authors and editors Marianne Gausche-Hill
to present cogent analyses of diagnostic and treatment options,
xxi
How This Medical Textbook Should Be Viewed by the Practicing Clinician
and Judicial System
The editors and authors of this text strongly believe that the complex practice of medicine, vagaries
of human diseases, unpredictability of pathologic conditions, and functions, dysfunctions, and
responses of the human body cannot be defined, explained, or rigidly categorized by any written
document. Therefore, it is neither the purpose nor intent of our textbook to serve as an authoritative
source on any medical condition, treatment plan, or clinical intervention, nor should our textbook be used
to rigorously define a standard of care that should be practiced by all clinicians.
Our written word provides the physician with a literature-referenced database and a reasonable
clinical guide combined with practical suggestions from individual experienced practitioners. We offer
a general reference source and clinical road map on a variety of conditions and procedures that may
confront emergency clinicians who are experienced in emergency medicine practice. This text cannot
replace physician judgment, cannot describe every possible aberration, nuance, clinical scenario,
or presentation, and cannot define rigid standards for clinical actions or procedures. Every medical
encounter must be individualized, and every patient must be approached on a case-by-case basis. No
complex medical interaction can possibly be reduced to the written word. The treatments, procedures,
and medical conditions described in this text do not constitute the total expertise or knowledge base
expected to be possessed by all emergency clinicians. Finally, many of the described complications and
adverse outcomes associated with implementing or withholding complex medical and surgical inter-
ventions may occur, even when every aspect of the intervention has been standard or performed
correctly.
Airway
Calvin A. Brown III | Ron M. Walls
patient with hypotension, open femur fracture, and diffuse it is part of a planned approach to the difficult airway. This may
abdominal tenderness warrants early intubation, even if the include use of a double setup, in which a rescue approach, such
patient is initially awake and alert, without airway injury or as cricothyrotomy, is simultaneously prepared in the event of
hypoxemia. Active resuscitation, pain control, need for invasive intubation failure. Regardless of the results of a reassuring bedside
procedures and imaging outside of the emergency department assessment for airway difficulty, significant challenges may be
(ED), and inevitable operative management dictate the need for encountered with intubation and bag mask ventilation and the
early airway control. In addition, a patient with penetrating neck clinician must be prepared for unanticipated difficulty.
trauma may have a patent airway and adequate gas exchange.
Nevertheless, early intubation is advisable when there is evidence Difficult Direct Laryngoscopy: LEMON
of vascular or direct airway injury because these patients tend to
deteriorate, and increasing hemorrhage or swelling in the neck Glottic visualization is paramount in emergency airway manage-
will compromise the airway and confound later attempts at ment. With direct laryngoscopy (DL), if the vocal cords can be
intubation. seen (Cormack and Lehane [CL] grade I or II view; Fig. 1.1), the
The common thread among these indications for intubation is chance of intubation success is high. However, when the glottic
the anticipated clinical course. In each case, it can be anticipated aperture cannot be visualized (CL grade III or IV), intubation
that future events may compromise the patient’s ability to main- success is less likely. Very few of the difficult airway markers
tain and protect the airway or ability to oxygenate and ventilate, thought to limit DL access have been scientifically validated, yet
and waiting until these occur may result in a difficult airway. applying them in combination can provide a reasonable assess-
ment of anticipated airway difficulty. Videolaryngoscopy, on
Identification of the Difficult Airway the other hand, rarely fails to provide adequate laryngeal visual-
ization, so characterization of difficult videolaryngoscopy predic-
In most patients, intubation is technically easy and straightfor- tors may not be possible. Like DL, adequate video views are
ward. Although early ED-based observational registries reported highly correlated with intubation success, although the strength
cricothyrotomy rates of about 1% for all intubations, more recent of this association can depend on the device used and operator
studies have shown a lower rate, less than 0.5%.3 As would be experience.3,6,7 Whether DL or videolaryngoscopy is planned, a
expected with an unselected, unscheduled patient population, the standard screening process for difficulty should be undertaken
ED cricothyrotomy rate is greater than in the operating room, with every patient. Our recommended approach uses the mne-
which occurs in approximately 1 in 200 to 2000 elective general monic LEMON (Box 1.1).
anesthesia cases.4 Bag-mask ventilation (BMV) is difficult in
approximately 1 in 50 general anesthesia patients and impossible L—Look Externally. The patient first should be examined
in approximately 1 in 600. BMV is difficult, however, in up to for external markers of difficult intubation, which are determined
one-third of patients in whom intubation failure occurs, and dif-
ficult BMV makes the likelihood of difficult intubation four times
higher and the likelihood of impossible intubation 12 times Grade 1 Grade 3
higher. The combination of failure of intubation, BMV, and oxy- Epiglottis
genation in elective anesthesia practice is estimated to be exceed- Vocal cord
ingly rare, roughly 1 in 30,000 elective anesthesia patients.4 These Arytenoids
numbers cannot be extrapolated to populations of ED patients
who are acutely ill or injured and for whom intubation is urgent
and unavoidable. Although patient selection cannot occur, as with
a preanesthetic visit, a preintubation analysis of factors predicting
difficult intubation gives the provider the information necessary
Grade 2 Grade 4
to formulate a safe and effective plan for intubation.
Preintubation assessment should evaluate the patient for
potential difficult intubation and difficult BMV, placement of and
ventilation with an extraglottic device (EGD; see later discussion),
and cricothyrotomy. Knowledge of all four domains is crucial to
successful planning. A patient who exhibits obvious difficult
Fig. 1.1. Cormack and Lehane grading system for glottic view. (Modi-
airway characteristics is highly predictive of a challenging intuba- fied from Walls RM, Murphy MF, editors: Manual of emergency airway
tion, although the emergency clinician should always be ready for management, ed 4, Philadelphia, 2012, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins;
a difficult to manage airway, because some difficult airways may with permission.)
not be identified by a bedside assessment.5
Airway difficulty exists on a spectrum and is contextual to
the provider’s experience, environment, and armamentarium of
BOX 1.1
devices. Airways predicted to be difficult when using a traditional
laryngoscope may not prove to be difficult when a videolaryngo-
scope is used. Some patients may have a single minor anatomic
LEMON Mnemonic for Evaluation of Difficult
or pathophysiologic reason for airway difficulty, whereas others Direct Laryngoscopy
may have numerous difficult airway characteristics. Although
both sets of patients represent potential intubation challenges, the Look externally for signs of difficult intubation (by gestalt)
latter group would likely have crossed a threshold beyond which Evaluate 3-3-2 rule
neuromuscular blockade would be avoided because a so-called Mallampati scale
can’t intubate and can’t oxygenate failed airway may ensue. In Obstruction or obesity
these cases, a preferred approach would include topical anesthesia, Neck mobility
parenteral sedation, and intubation without the use of a neuro- Adapted with permission from The Difficult Airway Course: Emergency and Walls RM,
muscular blocking agent (NBMA). Occasionally, RSI remains the Murphy MF, eds: Manual of Emergency Airway Management, 4th ed. Philadelphia:
preferred method, despite a concerning bedside assessment, when Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
CHAPTER 1 Airway 5
1 2 3 1
2
A B
Fig. 1.2. Final two steps of the 3-3-2 rule. A, Three fingers are placed along the floor of the mouth,
beginning at the mentum. B, Two fingers are placed in the laryngeal prominence (Adam’s apple). (Modified
from Murphy MF, Walls RM: Identification of difficult and failed airways. In Walls RM, Murphy MF, editors:
Manual of emergency airway management, ed 4, Philadelphia, 2012, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; the
3-3-2 rule copyright © 2012 by The difficult airway course: emergency; and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,
publishers, Manual of emergency airway management.)
of ED patients cannot willingly perform this assessment, but it redundant upper airway tissues, chest wall weight, and resis-
can be improvised by using a direct laryngoscope blade as a tance of abdominal mass)
tongue depressor in obtunded or uncooperative patients.9 • Advanced Age (best judged by the physiologic appearance of
the patient, but age older than 55 years increases risk)
O—Obstruction or Obesity. Upper airway (supraglottic) • Edentulous patients (“No teeth”), which independently inter-
obstruction may make visualization of the glottis, or intubation feres with mask seal
itself, mechanically impossible. Conditions such as epiglottitis, • Stiffness or resistance to ventilation (eg, asthma, COPD, pul-
head and neck cancer, Ludwig’s angina, neck hematoma, glottis monary edema, restrictive lung disease, term pregnancy)—
swelling, or glottic polyps can compromise laryngoscopy, passage may contribute to increased difficulty with BMV
of the endotracheal tube (ETT), BMV, or all three. Examine the The difficulty with BMV of the edentulous patient is the basis
patient for airway obstruction and assess the patient’s voice to of the advice often cited for patients with dentures: “teeth out to
satisfy this evaluation step. Although obesity alone may not be an intubate, teeth in to ventilate.” Another approach involves placing
independent marker of difficult direct laryngoscopy, it likely con- the mask inside the patient’s lower lip. This may limit air leak in
tributes to challenges in other areas of airway management. Nev- patients without teeth and eliminates the risk of aspiration associ-
ertheless, obese patients generally are more difficult to intubate ated with dental prosthetics or rolled gauze (Fig. 1.4).11 Difficult
than their nonobese counterparts, and preparations should BMV is not uncommon but, with proper technique, it usually is
account for this and for the more rapid oxyhemoglobin desatura- successful. A review by Kheterpal et al of more than 50,000
tion and increased difficulty with ventilation using BMV or an patients undergoing elective anesthesia has found that impossible
EGD (see later). BMV is exceptionally rare (0.2%) and is associated with neck
changes secondary to radiation therapy, presence of a beard, male
N—Neck Mobility. Neck mobility is desirable for any intu- gender, history of sleep apnea, and Mallampati class III or IV
bation technique and is essential for positioning the patient for airway.11a Impossible BMV was five times more likely if one of
optimal DL. Neck mobility is assessed by flexion and extension of these factors was present and 25 times more likely with four or
the patient’s head and neck through a full range of motion. Neck more.
extension is the most important motion, but placing the patient
in the full sniffing position provides the optimal laryngeal view Difficult Extraglottic Device Placement: RODS
by DL.10 Modest limitations of motion do not seriously impair
DL, but severe loss of motion, as can occur in ankylosing spon- Placement of an EGD, such as a laryngeal mask airway (LMA),
dylitis or rheumatoid arthritis, for example, may make DL impos- Combitube, or similar upper airway device, often can convert a
sible. Cervical spine immobilization in trauma patients artificially can’t intubate, can’t oxygenate situation to a can’t intubate, can
reduces cervical spine mobility, but DL is still highly successful in oxygenate situation, which allows time for rescue of a failed airway
this group of patients.7 (see following section). Difficulty achieving placement or ventila-
A similar mnemonic, LEMONS, has been described, with the tion with an EGD can be predicted by the mnemonic RODS.
“S” referring to the patient’s oxygen saturation. Although not a Fortunately, if the emergency clinician has already performed
direct contributor to difficulty with DL, a low starting oxygen the LEMON and MOANS assessments, only the D for distorted
saturation will result in a shorter period of safe apnea and a trun- anatomy remains to be evaluated (Box 1.3). EGDs are placed
cated time to perform laryngoscopy and successful endotracheal blindly and have a mask or balloon structure that, when inflated,
tube placement. As noted, identification of a difficult intubation obstructs the oropharynx proximally and esophageal inlet distally,
does not preclude use of an RSI technique. The crucial determina- permitting indirect ventilation. Distorted upper airway anatomy
tion is whether the emergency clinician judges that the patient has can result in a poor seal and ineffective ventilation.
a reasonable likelihood of intubation success, despite the difficul-
ties identified, and that ventilation with BMV or an EGD will be Difficult Cricothyrotomy: SMART
successful in case intubation fails (hence, the value of the BMV
and EGD assessments; see Boxes 1.2 and 1.3). Difficult cricothyrotomy can be anticipated whenever there is
limited access to the anterior neck or obscured laryngeal
Difficult Bag-Mask Ventilation: MOANS
Attributes of difficult BMV have largely been validated and can
be summarized with the mnemonic MOANS (Box 1.2).
• Mask seal compromise or difficulty
• Obstruction (particularly supraglottic obstruction, but can
be present anywhere in the airway) or Obesity (because of
BOX 1.2
BOX 1.3
BOX 1.4
Fig. 1.5. End-tidal CO2 detector before application. The indicator is
SMART Mnemonic for Evaluation of purple, which indicates failure to detect CO2. This also is the appearance
when the esophagus is intubated.
Difficult Cricothyrotomy
Surgery
Mass (abscess, hematoma)
Access/anatomy problems (obesity, edema)
Radiation
Tumor
Adapted with permission from The Difficult Airway Course: Emergency and Walls RM,
Murphy MF, eds: Manual of Emergency Airway Management, 4th ed. Philadelphia:
Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
space. Correlation of ETco2 detection with the depth markings on etry is useful in detecting esophageal intubation but may not
the ETT, particularly important in pediatric patients, confirms show a decreasing oxygen saturation for several minutes after a
tracheal placement. Rarely, BMV before intubation or ingestion failed intubation because of the oxygen reservoir (preoxygen-
of carbonated beverages may lead to the release of CO2 from the ation) created in the patient before intubation. Although chest
stomach after esophageal intubation, causing a transient false radiography is universally recommended after ETT placement, its
indication of tracheal intubation. Washout of this phenomenon primary purpose is to ensure that the tube is well positioned
universally occurs within six breaths. below the cords and above the carina. A single anteroposterior
Although colorimetric ETco2 measurement is highly sensitive chest radiograph is not sufficient to detect esophageal intubation,
and specific for detecting esophageal intubation, caution is although esophageal intubation may be detected if the ETT is
required for patients in cardiopulmonary arrest. Insufficient gas clearly outside the air shadow of the trachea. In cases in which
exchange may prevent CO2 detection in the exhaled air, even when doubt persists, a fiberoptic scope can be passed through the ETT
the tube is correctly placed within the trachea. In patients in car- to identify tracheal rings, another gold standard for confirmation
diopulmonary arrest, a CO2 level greater than 2%, which is the of tracheal placement.
threshold for color change on colorimetric capnometers, should
be considered definitive evidence of correct ETT placement, but MANAGEMENT
the absence of such CO2 cannot be used reliably as an indicator
of esophageal intubation. Recent resuscitation guidelines have Decision Making
suggested continuous quantitative measurement of ETco2 during
cardiac arrest to gauge the efficacy of cardiopulmonary resuscita- Algorithms for emergency airway management have been devel-
tion.13 This circumstance arises in approximately 25% to 40% of oped and provide a useful guide for planning intubation and
intubated cardiac arrest patients. In all other patients, absence of rescue in case of intubation failure. The algorithm assumes that a
CO2 detection indicates failure to intubate the trachea, and rapid decision to intubate has been made and outlines such an approach.
reintubation is indicated. The approach is predicated on two key determinations that are to
When ETco2 detection is not possible, tracheal tube position be made before active airway management is initiated (Fig. 1.7).
can be confirmed with other techniques. One approach involves The first determination is whether the patient is in cardiopulmo-
point-of-care ultrasound. In live patient and cadaver studies, nary arrest or a state of near arrest and is likely to be unresponsive
ultrasonography performed over the cricothyroid membrane or to direct laryngoscopy. Such a patient—agonal, near death, in
upper trachea has accurately confirmed ETT position in the
trachea, especially during intubation.14,15
Another method of tube placement confirmation is the aspira-
tion technique, based on the anatomic differences between the Needs
trachea and esophagus. The esophagus is a muscular structure intubation
with no support within its walls and is therefore collapsible when
negative pressure is applied. The trachea is held patent by carti-
laginous rings and thus is less likely to collapse when negative Unresponsive? Yes
pressure is applied. Vigorous aspiration of air through the ETT Crash airway
Near death?
with the ETT cuff deflated results in occlusion of the ETT orifices
by the soft walls of the esophagus, whereas aspiration after tra- No
cheal placement of the tube is easy and rapid. Predict difficult Yes
Bulb or syringe aspiration devices may be used in patients in Difficult airway
airway?
cardiac arrest who have no detectable CO2. Although such devices From difficult
are highly reliable at detecting esophageal intubation (sensitivity No
airway
> 95%), false-positives, in which a correctly placed tracheal tube
is incorrectly identified as esophageal, can occur in up to 25% of RSI
cardiac arrest patients. Aspiration devices may be useful in the
out-of-hospital setting when poor lighting hampers colorimetric
ETco2 determination. They also are good backup devices when Attempt
cardiac arrest confounds attempts to assess placement with ETco2. intubation
Detection of expired CO2 is more reliable and is the standard for
confirmation of tracheal placement of an ETT and for early detec- Yes
tion of accidental esophageal intubation. Aspiration devices have Successful? Postintubation
management
a valuable but secondary role. Also, a bougie can be placed through
the center of an ETT to corroborate tube location further. A No
bougie that can be passed deeply through the tube, with little or Yes
Failure to maintain
no resistance, suggests an esophageal intubation because the Failed airway
oxygenation?
bougie has likely passed beyond the tube and into the stomach. If
the ETT is in the trachea, the tip of the bougie will become wedged No
after only a few inches, likely in the right mainstem bronchus, and Yes
a vibration from contact with the anterior tracheal rings may be ≥ 3 attempts at OTI by
experienced operator?
transmitted to the operator’s fingertips.
Accordingly, ETco2 detection, with aspiration, bougie, or an No
ultrasound technique as backup, should be considered the primary
means of ETT placement confirmation. Secondary means include Fig. 1.7. Main emergency airway management algorithm. OTI, Orotra-
cheal intubation; RSI, rapid sequence intubation. (Modified from Walls
physical examination findings, oximetry, and radiography. The RM: The emergency airway algorithms. In Walls RM, Murphy MF, editors:
examiner should auscultate both lung fields and the epigastric Manual of emergency airway management, ed 4, Philadelphia, 2012,
area. Pulse oximetry is indicated as a monitoring technique in all Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; copyright © 2012, The difficult airway
critically ill patients, not just those who require intubation. Oxim- course: emergency; and Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, publishers.)
CHAPTER 1 Airway 9
Maintain
oxygenation Yes One best attempt
Forced to act? Give RSI drugs
successful?
Yes No Yes
Intubation attempt Postintubation No
successful? management
Failure to maintain Yes Failed
No PIM
oxygenation? airway
Unable to Yes
Failed airway No
bag ventilate?
No BMV or EGD Yes Intubation Yes RSI with
predicted to be predicted to double setup
Succinylcholine successful? be successful?
2 mg/kg IVP
No
No
Attempt
Awake technique Yes Postintubation
intubation
successful? management
or RSI
Yes No
Successful? Postintubation
management
No ILMA
Flexible endoscopy Go to main
Failure to maintain Yes Videolaryngoscopy
Failed airway algorithm
oxygenation? Cricothyrotomy
BNTI
No
Fig. 1.9. Difficult airway algorithm. BMV, Bag-mask ventilation; BNTI,
≥3 attempts by Yes blind nasotracheal intubation; DL, direct laryngoscopy; EGD, extraglottic
experienced operator? device; ILMA, intubating laryngeal mask airway; PIM, postintubation
management; RSI, rapid sequence intubation. (Modified from Walls RM:
No The emergency airway algorithms. In Walls RM, Murphy MF, editors:
Manual of emergency airway management, ed 4, Philadelphia, 2012,
Fig. 1.8. Crash airway algorithm. IVP, Intravenous push. (Modified from Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; copyright © 2012, The difficult airway
Walls RM: The emergency airway algorithms. In Walls RM, Murphy course: emergency; and Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, publishers.)
MF, editors: Manual of emergency airway management, ed 4, Philadel-
phia, 2012, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; copyright © 2012, The
difficult airway course: emergency; and Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins,
publishers.) at laryngoscopy because subsequent attempts at laryngoscopy by
the same clinician are unlikely to succeed. The three failed laryn-
goscopy attempts are defined as attempts by an experienced clini-
cian using the best possible patient positioning and technique.
circulatory collapse—is deemed a crash airway patient for the Three attempts by a physician trainee using a direct laryngoscope
purposes of emergency airway management and is treated using may not count, necessarily, as best attempts if an experienced
the crash airway algorithm by an immediate intubation attempt emergency clinician is available or videolaryngoscopy has not yet
without use of drugs; this can be supplemented by a single large been attempted. Also, if the emergency clinician ascertains after
dose of succinylcholine if the attempt to intubate fails, and the even a single attempt that intubation will be impossible (eg, grade
patient is thought not to be sufficiently relaxed (Fig. 1.8). If a crash 4 laryngoscopic view with DL, despite optimal patient positioning
airway is not present, a decision of whether the patient represents and use of external laryngeal manipulation), and no alternative
a difficult intubation, as determined by the LEMON, MOANS, device (eg, videolaryngoscope, intubating LMA) is available, a
RODS, and SMART evaluations is made and, if so, the difficult failed airway is present. The failed airway is managed according
airway algorithm is used (Fig. 1.9). to the failed airway algorithm (Fig. 1.10).
For patients who require emergency intubation but who have
neither a crash airway nor a difficult airway, RSI is indicated. RSI Difficult Airway
provides the safest and quickest method of achieving intubation
in such patients.3,16 After administration of RSI drugs, intubation The perception of a difficult airway is relative, and many emer-
attempts are repeated until the patient is intubated or a failed gency intubations could be considered difficult. Deciding whether
intubation is identified. If more than one intubation attempt is to treat the airway as a typical emergency airway or whether to
required, oxygen saturation is monitored continuously and, if use the difficult airway algorithm is based on the degree of per-
saturation falls to 90% or less, BMV is performed until saturation ceived difficulty, operator experience, armamentarium of airway
is recovered for another attempt. If the oxygen saturation contin- devices available, and individual circumstances of the case. The
ues to fall, despite optimal use of BMV or EGD, a failed airway LEMON, MOANS, RODS, and SMART assessments provide a
exists. This is referred to as a can’t intubate, can’t oxygenate sce- systematic framework to assist in identifying the potentially dif-
nario. A failed airway also is defined as three unsuccessful attempts ficult airway.
10 PART I Fundamental Clinical Concepts | SECTION One Critical Management Principles
Failed airway
or insertion of an alternative airway device, depending on the
Call for assistance operator’s judgment.
criteria
Therefore, in the difficult airway algorithm, the first determina-
Extraglottic device tion is whether the operator is forced to act. If so, RSI drugs are
may be attempted
given, a best attempt at laryngoscopy is undertaken and, if intuba-
Failure to maintain Yes tion is not successful, the airway is considered failed, and the
oxygenation? Cricothyrotomy operator moves immediately to the failed airway algorithm. In the
If contraindicated
vast majority of difficult airway situations, however, the operator
No is not forced to act, and the first step is to ensure that oxygenation
is sufficient to permit a planned orderly approach to airway man-
agement. If oxygenation is inadequate and cannot be made
Choose one of:
Flexible endoscopy
adequate by supplementation with BMV, the airway should be
Videolaryngoscopy considered a failed airway. Although inadequate oxygenation
Extraglottic device should be defined on a case by case basis, oxygenation saturation
Lighted stylet falling below 90% is the accepted threshold, because this represents
Cricothyrotomy the point at which hemoglobin undergoes a conformational
change, more readily releases oxygen, and increases the pace of
further desaturation. Oxyhemoglobin saturations in the mid-80s,
Yes Postintubation
Cuffed ETT placed? if holding steady, might be considered adequate in some circum-
management stances, particularly if the patient is chronically hypoxemic. When
No oxygenation is inadequate or dropping, the failed airway algorithm
should be used because the predicted high degree of intubation
Arrange for difficulty, combined with failure to maintain oxygen saturation, is
definitive airway
management analogous to the can’t intubate, can’t oxygenate scenario.
When oxygenation is adequate, however, the next consider-
Fig. 1.10. Failed airway algorithm. ETT, Endotracheal tube. (Modified ation is whether RSI is appropriate, on the basis of the operator’s
from Walls RM: The emergency airway algorithms. In Walls RM, Murphy assessment of the likelihood of (1) successful ventilation with
MF, editors: Manual of emergency airway management, ed 4, Philadel- BMV or EGD in case intubation is unsuccessful and (2) the likeli-
phia, 2012, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; copyright © 2012, The diffi-
cult airway course: emergency; and Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins,
hood of successful intubation by laryngoscopy. If the operator
publishers.) judges laryngoscopy likely to succeed and is confident that he or
she can oxygenate the patient if intubation fails, RSI is performed.
In such cases, a double setup can be used in which RSI is planned
and preparations are simultaneously undertaken for rescue crico-
When preintubation evaluation identifies a potentially difficult thyrotomy or another rescue technique. If the operator is not
airway (see Fig. 1.9), the approach is based on the premise that confident of successful intubation by RSI and time allows, an
NMBAs generally should not be used unless the emergency clini- awake technique can be used. In this context, awake means that
cian believes that (1) intubation is likely to be successful and (2) the patient continues to breathe and, although intravenous seda-
oxygenation can be maintained via BMV or EGD should the tion and analgesia may be administered, can cooperate with care-
patient desaturate during a failed intubation attempt. The one givers. The patient is prepared by applying topical anesthesia with
exception to this recommendation occurs in the forced to act atomized or nebulized lidocaine, ideally preceded by a drying
scenario. agent such as glycopyrrolate. Titrated doses of a sedative and
A forced to act imperative permits RSI, even in a highly diffi- analgesic agents (or ketamine, which provides both actions) may
cult airway situation in which the operator is not confident of the be required for the patient to tolerate the procedure. Once this is
success of laryngoscopy or of sustaining oxygenation. This usually accomplished, a number of different devices can then be used to
occurs in the setting of a rapidly deteriorating patient with an attempt glottic visualization, although flexible bronchoscopes and
obviously difficult airway and a presumed clinical trajectory of videolaryngoscopes are preferable. If the glottis is adequately visu-
imminent arrest. Although this is not yet a crash airway situation, alized, the patient can be intubated at that time or, in a stable
the operator is forced to act—that is, there is a need to act imme- difficult airway situation, the emergency clinician may proceed
diately to intubate before orotracheal intubation quickly becomes with planned RSI, now assured of intubation success. If the awake
impossible or the patient arrests. The patient retains sufficient laryngoscopy is unsuccessful, the patient can be intubated with
muscle tone and voluntary effort (including combative behavior any of numerous techniques shown in the last box in Fig. 1.9. For
induced by hypoxia) to require administration of drugs before each of these methods, the patient is kept breathing but is variably
intubation can be attempted. Consider an agitated patient with sedated and anesthetized. The choice among these methods
rapidly advancing anaphylaxis or angioedema, a morbidly obese depends on clinician experience and preference, device availabil-
patient in severe, end-stage status asthmaticus, or an intensive care ity, and patient attributes.
unit (ICU) patient with inadvertent or premature extubation,
respiratory failure, and difficult airway. Within seconds to minutes, Failed Airway
perhaps before a full difficult airway assessment can be done or
preparations can be completed for an alternative airway approach Management of the failed airway is dictated by whether the patient
(eg, flexible endoscopy), the patient’s rapid deterioration signals can be oxygenated. If adequate oxygenation cannot be maintained
impending respiratory arrest. This is a unique situation in which with rescue BMV, the rescue technique of first resort is cricothy-
the operator may be compelled to take the one best chance to rotomy (see Fig. 1.10). Multiple attempts at other methods in
secure the airway by rapidly administering RSI drugs, despite the context of failed oxygenation only delay cricothyrotomy and
obvious airway difficulty, and attempting intubation before the place the patient at increased risk for hypoxic brain injury. If an
airway crisis has advanced to the point that intubation is impos- alternative device (ie, an EGD such as an LMA or Combitube) is
sible or delay has caused hypoxic arrest. If laryngoscopy fails, the readily available, however, and the operator judges it to be an
RSI drugs have optimized patient conditions for cricothyrotomy appropriate device for the patient’s anatomy, single attempt can
CHAPTER 1 Airway 11
SaO2 (%)
If adequate oxygenation is possible, several options are avail- 80
able for the failed airway. In almost all cases, cricothyrotomy is the
definitive rescue technique for the failed airway if time does not
allow for other approaches (ie, preservation of oxygenation) or if 70
Mean time to recovery
they fail. The fundamental difference in philosophy between the of twitch height from
difficult and failed airway is that the difficult airway is planned 1 mg/kg succinylcholine IV
for, and the standard is to place a definitive airway (cuffed ETT) 60 10% 50% 90%
in the trachea. The failed airway is not planned for, and the stan- 0
dard is to achieve an airway that provides adequate oxygenation 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
to avert hypoxic brain injury. Some devices used in the failed 6.8 8.5 10.2
airway (eg, EGDs) are temporary and do not provide definitive ⋅
Time of VE = 0 (min)
airway protection.
Obese 127-kg adult Normal 70-kg adult
Normal 10-kg child Moderately ill 70-kg adult
Methods of Intubation
Although many techniques are available for intubation of the Fig. 1.11. Desaturation time for apneic, fully preoxygenated patients.
Children, patients with comorbidity, and obese patients desaturate much
emergency patient, four methods are the most common, with RSI more rapidly than healthy normal adults. The box on the lower right side
being the most frequent approach.3,16 of the graph depicts time to recovery from succinylcholine, which in
almost all cases exceeds safe apnea time. Note also the precipitous
decline of oxygen saturation from 90% to 0% for all groups. VE, Expired
Rapid Sequence Intubation volume. (Modified from Benumof JL, Dagg R, Benumof R: Critical hemo-
RSI is the cornerstone of modern emergency airway management globin desaturation will occur before return to unparalyzed state follow-
ing 1 mg/kg intravenous succinylcholine. Anesthesiology 87:979–982,
and is defined as the nearly simultaneous administration of a 1997.)
potent sedative (induction) agent and NMBA, usually succinyl-
choline or rocuronium, for the purpose of tracheal intubation.
This approach provides optimal intubating conditions and has
long been thought to minimize the risk of aspiration of gastric BOX 1.5
contents. A systematic review of the literature in 2007 failed to
prove that RSI results in a lower incidence of aspiration than Pretreatment Agents for Rapid
other techniques, but the authors correctly noted that virtually no Sequence Intubationa
studies have ever been designed to measure this precise endpoint.
RSI is nevertheless the most widely used technique for emergency Reactive airway disease: Albuterol, 2.5 mg, by nebulizer. If time does
intubation of patients without identifiable difficult airway attri- not permit albuterol nebulizer, give lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg IV.
butes, with recent large registry data showing that it is used in Cardiovascular disease: Fentanyl, 3 µg/kg, to mitigate sympathetic
85% of all emergency department intubations.3,16 discharge
The central concept of RSI is to take the patient from the start- Elevated ICP: Fentanyl, 3 µg/kg, to mitigate sympathetic discharge and
ing point (eg, conscious, breathing spontaneously) to a state of attendant rise in ICP
unconsciousness with complete neuromuscular paralysis, and
ICP, intracranial pressure.
then to achieve intubation without interposed assisted ventilation. a
Given 2–3 min before induction and paralysis.
The risk of aspiration of gastric contents is thought to be signifi-
cantly higher for patients who have not fasted before induction.
Application of positive-pressure ventilation can cause air to pass
BOX 1.6
into the stomach, resulting in gastric distention and likely increas-
ing the risk of regurgitation and aspiration. The purpose of RSI
is to avoid positive-pressure ventilation until the ETT is placed
The Seven Ps of Rapid Sequence Intubation
correctly in the trachea, with the cuff inflated. This requires a
preoxygenation phase, during which mixed alveolar gases (mostly 1. Preparation
nitrogen) within the lungs’ functional residual capacity are 2. Preoxygenation
replaced with oxygen, permitting at least several minutes of apnea 3. Pretreatment
4. Paralysis with induction
(see later discussion) in a healthy normal body habitus adult
5. Positioning
before oxygen desaturation to less than 90% ensues (Fig. 1.11). 6. Placement of tube
Use of RSI also facilitates successful endotracheal intubation 7. Postintubation management
by causing complete relaxation of the patient’s musculature,
allowing better access to the airway. Finally, RSI permits pharma-
cologic control of the physiologic responses to laryngoscopy and
intubation, mitigating potential adverse effects. These effects Preparation. In the initial phase, the patient is assessed
include further elevations in intracranial pressure (ICP) in for intubation difficulty, unless this has already been done,
response to the procedure and to the sympathetic discharge and the intubation is planned, including determining dosages and
resulting from laryngoscopy (Box 1.5). RSI is a series of discrete sequence of drugs, tube size, and laryngoscope type, blade, and
steps, and every step should be planned (Box 1.6). size. Drugs are drawn up and labeled. All necessary equipment is
12 PART I Fundamental Clinical Concepts | SECTION One Critical Management Principles
assembled. All patients require continuous cardiac and pulse has a vanishing role in emergency airway management and may
oximetry monitoring. At least one and preferably two good- disappear completely in the near future (see Box 1.5).
quality intravenous lines should be established. Redundancy is
always desirable in case of equipment or intravenous access Paralysis With Induction. In this phase, a potent sedative
failure. Most importantly, a rescue plan for intubation failure agent is administered by rapid intravenous (IV) push in a dose
should be developed at this time and made known to the appro- capable of producing unconsciousness rapidly. This is immedi-
priate members of the resuscitation team. ately followed by rapid administration of an intubating dose
of an NMBA, either succinylcholine at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg IV or
Preoxygenation. Administration of 100% oxygen for 3 rocuronium, 1 mg/kg. It is usual to wait 45 seconds from when
minutes of normal tidal volume breathing in a normal healthy the succinylcholine is given and 60 seconds from when rocuronium
adult establishes an adequate oxygen reservoir to permit 6 to 8 is given to allow sufficient paralysis to occur. The results from two
minutes of safe apnea before oxygen desaturation to less than 90% large meta-analyses have revealed that intubating conditions pro-
occurs (see Fig. 1.11). Additional preoxygenation does not improve vided by each drug are equivalent as long as rocuronium is dosed
arterial oxygen tension. The time to desaturation to less than 90% between 1.0 and 1.2 mg/kg IV.
in children, obese adults, late-term pregnant women, and patients
who are acutely ill or injured is considerably shorter. Desaturation Positioning. The patient should be positioned for intubation
time also is reduced if the patient does not inspire 100% oxygen. as consciousness is lost. Usually, positioning involves head exten-
Nevertheless, adequate preoxygenation usually can be obtained, sion, often with flexion of the neck on the body. Although simple
even in ED patients, to permit minutes of apnea before there is extension may be adequate, a full sniffing position with cervical
oxygen desaturation to less than 90%. Preoxygenation is also spine extension and head elevation is optimal if DL is used.10 The
essential to the no-bagging approach of RSI. If time is insufficient Sellick maneuver—application of firm, backward pressure over
for a full 3-minute preoxygenation phase, eight vital capacity the cricoid cartilage with the goal of obstructing the cervical
breaths with high-flow oxygen can achieve oxygen saturations and esophagus and reducing the risk of aspiration—had long been
apnea times that match or exceed those obtained with traditional recommended to minimize the risk of passive regurgitation and
preoxygenation. Desaturation time in obese patients can be pro- hence aspiration, but is no longer recommended. The Sellick
longed by preoxygenating with the patient in a head-up position maneuver is incorrectly applied by a variety of operators, making
and by continuing supplemental oxygen (via nasal cannula at a laryngoscopy or intubation more difficult in some patients, and
flow rate of 5–15 L/min) after motor paralysis and during laryn- aspiration often occurs despite use of the Sellick maneuver. In
goscopy until the ETT is successfully placed. In obese patients, it many patients, the cervical esophagus is positioned lateral to the
extends the time to desaturation to 95% from 3.5 to 5.3 minutes.17,18 cricoid ring in a relationship that is exaggerated by posterior pres-
This so-called apneic oxygenation takes advantage of a physio- sure, rarely resulting in esophageal obstruction. Accordingly, we
logic principle termed aventilatory mass flow.19 Even though do not recommend routine use of the Sellick maneuver, and it
patients are paralyzed during RSI, circulation is unaltered. The should be considered optional, applied selectively, and released or
constant diffusion of alveolar oxygen into the pulmonary circula- modified early if the laryngeal view is poor or tube passage is dif-
tion creates a natural downward gradient promoting passive ficult. After administration of an induction agent and NMBA,
oxygen movement from the patient’s upper airway into the gas- although the patient becomes unconscious and apneic, BMV
exchanging portions of the lungs. Oxygen saturation monitors should not be initiated unless the oxygen saturation falls to 90%.
permit earlier detection of desaturation during laryngoscopy, but
preoxygenation remains an essential step in RSI. Placement of Tube. Approximately 45 to 60 seconds after
administration of the NMBA, the patient is relaxed sufficiently to
Pretreatment. During this phase, drugs are administered 3 permit laryngoscopy. This is assessed most easily by moving the
minutes before the administration of succinylcholine and an mandible to test for mobility and absence of muscle tone. Place
induction agent to mitigate the adverse physiologic effects of the ETT during glottic visualization with the laryngoscope.
laryngoscopy and intubation on the patient’s presenting condi- Confirm placement, as described earlier. If the first attempt is
tion. Pretreatment approaches have evolved over time. Periodic unsuccessful but oxygen saturation remains high, it is not neces-
reappraisals of the available literature have whittled the pretreat- sary to ventilate the patient with a bag and mask between intuba-
ment approach down to the bare essentials with a focus on opti- tion attempts. If the oxygen saturation is approaching 90%, the
mizing patient physiology prior to any intubation attempts. Older patient may be ventilated briefly with a bag and mask between
practices, such as the routine use of atropine for intubation of attempts to reestablish the oxygen reservoir.
small children, have largely been abandoned.
Intubation is intensely stimulating and results in a sympathetic Postintubation Management. After confirmation of tube
discharge, or reflex sympathetic response to laryngoscopy (RSRL). placement by ETco2, obtain a chest radiograph to confirm that
In patients suffering from a hypertensive emergency, sympatholy- mainstem intubation has not occurred and to assess the lungs. If
sis with fentanyl (3 mcg/kg IV) administered 3 minutes before RSI available, place the patient on continuous capnography. In general,
can optimize the patient’s hemodynamics by attenuating spikes in long-acting NMBAs (eg, pancuronium, vecuronium) are avoided;
blood pressure and shear forces, both of which are considered the focus is on optimal management using opioid analgesics and
undesirable in patients with elevations of intracranial pressure sedative agents to facilitate mechanical ventilation. An adequate
(ICP), aortic disease, acute coronary syndromes and neurovascu- dose of a benzodiazepine (eg, midazolam, 0.1–0.2 mg/kg IV)
lar emergencies. and opioid analgesic (eg, fentanyl, 3–5 µg/kg IV, or morphine,
Patients with reactive airways disease can exhibit worsening 0.2–0.3 mg/kg IV) is given to improve patient comfort and
pulmonary mechanics after intubation as a result of broncho- decrease sympathetic response to the ETT. Propofol infusion
spasm. Controversy exists regarding whether lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg (5–50 µg/kg/min IV) with supplemental analgesia is an effective
IV) confers any additional benefit, beyond albuterol, and should method for managing intubated patients who do not have hypo-
be considered optional at best. Asthmatic patients being intubated tension or ongoing bleeding and is especially helpful for manage-
in the ED for status asthmaticus will have received albuterol before ment of neurologic emergencies because its clinical duration of
intubation, and it is unlikely in these patients that lidocaine has action is very short (<5 minutes), allowing frequent neurologic
any additive protective effect and is not recommended. Lidocaine examinations. An NMBA is added only if appropriate use of
CHAPTER 1 Airway 13
CHAPTER 21
CHAPTER 22
W hen they got back to Morton there was Puddle in the hall, with
that warm smile of hers, always just a little mocking yet pitiful too,
that queer composite smile that made her face so arresting. And the
sight of this faithful little grey woman brought home to Stephen the fact
that she had missed her. She had missed her, she found, out of all
proportion to the size of the creature, which seemed to have
diminished. Coming back to it after those weeks of absence, Puddle’s
smallness seemed to be even smaller, and Stephen could not help
laughing as she hugged her. Then she suddenly lifted her right off her
feet with as much ease as though she had been a baby.
Morton smelt good with its log fires burning, and Morton looked
good with the goodness of home. Stephen sighed with something very
like contentment: ‘Lord! I’m so glad to be back again, Puddle. I must
have been a cat in my last incarnation; I hate strange places—
especially Cornwall.’
Puddle smiled grimly. She thought that she knew why Stephen had
hated Cornwall.
After tea Stephen wandered about the house, touching first this,
then that, with affectionate fingers. But presently she went off to the
stables with sugar for Collins and carrots for Raftery; and there in his
spacious, hay-scented loose box, Raftery was waiting for Stephen. He
made a queer little sound in his throat, and his soft Irish eyes said:
‘You’re home, home, home. I’ve grown tired with waiting, and with
wishing you home.’
And she answered: ‘Yes, I’ve come back to you, Raftery.’
Then she threw her strong arm around his neck, and they talked
together for quite a long while—not in Irish or English but in a quiet
language having very few words but many small sounds and many
small movements, that meant much more than words.
‘Since you went I’ve discovered a wonderful thing,’ he told her, ‘I’ve
discovered that for me you are God. It’s like that some times with us
humbler people, we may only know God through His human image.’
‘Raftery,’ she murmured, ‘oh, Raftery, my dear—I was so young
when you came to Morton. Do you remember that first day out hunting
when you jumped the huge hedge in our big north paddock? What a
jump! It ought to go down to history. You were splendidly cool and
collected about it. Thank the Lord you were—I was only a kid, all the
same it was very foolish of us, Raftery.’
She gave him a carrot, which he took with contentment from the
hand of his God, and proceeded to munch. And she watched him
munch it, contented in her turn, hoping that the carrot was succulent
and sweet; hoping that his innocent cup of pleasure might be full to the
brim and overflowing. Like God indeed, she tended his needs, mixing
the evening meal in his manger, holding the water bucket to his lips
while he sucked in the cool, clear, health-giving water. A groom came
along with fresh trusses of straw which he opened and tossed among
Raftery’s bedding; then he took off the smart blue and red day clothing,
and buckled him up in a warm night blanket. Beyond in the far loose
box by the window, Sir Philip’s young chestnut kicked loudly for supper.
‘Woa horse! Get up there! Stop kicking them boards!’ And the
groom hurried off to attend to the chestnut.
Collins, who had spat out his two lumps of sugar, was now busy
indulging his morbid passion. His sides were swollen well-nigh to
bursting—blown out like an air balloon was old Collins from the evil and
dyspeptic effects of the straw, plus his own woeful lack of molars. He
stared at Stephen with whitish-blue eyes that saw nothing, and when
she touched him he grunted—a discourteous sound which meant:
‘Leave me alone!’ So after a mild reproof she left him to his sins and his
indigestion.
Last but not least, she strolled down to the home of the two-legged
creature who had once reigned supreme in those princely but now
depleted stables. And the lamplight streamed out through uncurtained
windows to meet her, so that she walked on lamplight. A slim streak of
gold led right up to the porch of old Williams’ comfortable cottage. She
found him sitting with the Bible on his knees, peering crossly down at
the Scriptures through his glasses. He had taken to reading the
Scriptures aloud to himself—a melancholy occupation. He was at this
now. As Stephen entered she could hear him mumbling from
Revelation: ‘And the heads of the horses were as the heads of lions;
and out of their mouths issued fire and smoke and brimstone.’
He looked up, and hastily twitched off his glasses: ‘Miss Stephen!’
‘Sit still—stop where you are, Williams.’
But Williams had the arrogance of the humble. He was proud of the
stern traditions of his service, and his pride forbade him to sit in her
presence, in spite of their long and kind years of friendship. Yet when
he spoke he must grumble a little, as though she were still the very
small child who had swaggered round the stables rubbing her chin,
imitating his every expression and gesture.
‘You didn’t ought to have no ’orses, Miss Stephen, the way you runs
off and leaves them;’ he grumbled, ‘Raftery’s been off ’is feed these last
days. I’ve been talkin’ to that Jim what you sets such store by!
Impudent young blight, ’e answered me back like as though I’d no right
to express me opinion. But I says to ’im: “You just wait, lad,” I says,
“You wait until I gets ’old of Miss Stephen!” ’
For Williams could never keep clear of the stables, and could never
refrain from nagging when he got there. Deposed he might be, but not
yet defeated even by old age, as grooms knew to their cost. The tap of
his heavy oak stick in the yard was enough to send Jim and his
underling flying to hide curry-combs and brushes out of sight. Williams
needed no glasses when it came to disorder.
‘Be this place ’ere a stable or be it a pigsty, I wonder?’ was now his
habitual greeting.
His wife came bustling in from the kitchen: ‘Sit down, Miss Stephen,’
and she dusted a chair.
Stephen sat down and glanced at the Bible where it lay, still open,
on the table.
‘Yes,’ said Williams dourly, as though she had spoken, ‘I’m reduced
to readin’ about ’eavenly ’orses. A nice endin’ that for a man like me,
what’s been in the service of Sir Philip Gordon, what’s ’ad ’is legs
across the best ’unters as ever was seen in this county or any! And I
don’t believe in them lion-headed beasts breathin’ fire and brimstone,
it’s all agin nature. Whoever it was wrote them Revelations, can’t never
have been inside of a stable. I don’t believe in no ’eavenly ’orses
neither—there won’t be no ’orses in ’eaven; and a good thing too,
judgin’ by the description.’
‘I’m surprised at you, Arth-thur, bein’ so disrespectful to The Book!’
his wife reproached him gravely.
‘Well, it ain’t no encyclopaedee to the stable, and that’s a sure
thing,’ grinned Williams.
Stephen looked from one to the other. They were old, very old, fast
approaching completion. Quite soon their circle would be complete,
and then Williams would be able to tackle Saint John on the points of
those heavenly horses.
Mrs. Williams glanced apologetically at her: ‘Excuse ’im, Miss
Stephen, ’e’s gettin’ rather childish. ’E won’t read no pretty parts of The
Book; all ’e’ll read is them parts about chariots and such like. All what’s
to do with ’orses ’e reads; and then ’e’s so unbelievin’—it’s aw-ful!’ But
she looked at her mate with the eyes of a mother, very gentle and
tolerant eyes.
And Stephen, seeing those two together, could picture them as they
must once have been, in the halcyon days of their youthful vigour. For
she thought that she glimpsed through the dust of the years, a faint
flicker of the girl who had lingered in the lanes when the young man
Williams and she had been courting. And looking at Williams as he
stood before her twitching and bowed, she thought that she glimpsed a
faint flicker of the youth, very stalwart and comely, who had bent his
head downwards and sideways as he walked and whispered and
kissed in the lanes. And because they were old yet undivided, her heart
ached; not for them but rather for Stephen. Her youth seemed as dross
when compared to their honourable age; because they were undivided.
She said: ‘Make him sit down, I don’t want him to stand.’ And she
got up and pushed her own chair towards him.
But old Mrs. Williams shook her white head slowly: ‘No, Miss
Stephen, ’e wouldn’t sit down in your presence. Beggin’ your pardon, it
would ’urt Arth-thur’s feelin’s to be made to sit down; it would make ’im
feel as ’is days of service was really over.’
‘I don’t need to sit down,’ declared Williams.
So Stephen wished them both a good night, promising to come
again very soon; and Williams hobbled out to the path which was now
quite golden from border to border, for the door of the cottage was
standing wide open and the glow from the lamp streamed over the
path. Once more she found herself walking on lamplight, while
Williams, bareheaded, stood and watched her departure. Then her feet
were caught up and entangled in shadows again, as she made her way
under the trees.
But presently came a familiar fragrance—logs burning on the wide,
friendly hearths of Morton. Logs burning—quite soon the lakes would
be frozen—‘and the ice looks like slabs of gold in the sunset, when you
and I come and stand here in the winter . . . and as we walk back we
can smell the log fires long before we can see them, and we love that
good smell because it means home, and our home is Morton . . .
because it means home and our home is Morton. . . .’
Oh, intolerable fragrance of log fires burning!
CHAPTER 23
1
A ngela did not return in a week, she had decided to remain another
fortnight in Scotland. She was staying now with the Peacocks, it
seemed, and would not get back until after her birthday. Stephen
looked at the beautiful ring as it gleamed in its little white velvet box,
and her disappointment and chagrin were childish.
But Violet Antrim, who had also been staying with the Peacocks,
had arrived home full of importance. She walked in on Stephen one
afternoon to announce her engagement to young Alec Peacock. She
was so much engaged and so haughty about it that Stephen, whose
nerves were already on edge, was very soon literally itching to slap her.
Violet was now able to look down on Stephen from the height of her
newly gained knowledge of men—knowing Alec she felt that she knew
the whole species.
‘It’s a terrible pity you dress as you do, my dear,’ she remarked, with
the manner of sixty, ‘a young girl’s so much more attractive when she’s
soft-don’t you think you could soften your clothes just a little? I mean,
you do want to get married, don’t you! No woman’s complete until she’s
married. After all, no woman can really stand alone, she always needs
a man to protect her.’
Stephen said: ‘I’m all right—getting on nicely, thank you!’
‘Oh, no, but you can’t be!’ Violet insisted. ‘I was talking to Alec and
Roger about you, and Roger was saying it’s an awful mistake for
women to get false ideas into their heads. He thinks you’ve got rather a
bee in your bonnet; he told Alec that you’d be quite a womanly woman
if you’d only stop trying to ape what you’re not.’ Presently she said,
staring rather hard: ‘That Mrs. Crossby—do you really like her? Of
course I know you’re friends and all that—But why are you friends?
You’ve got nothing in common. She’s what Roger calls a thorough
man’s woman. I think myself she’s a bit of a climber. Do you want to be
used as a scaling ladder for storming the fortifications of the county?
The Peacocks have known old Crossby for years, he’s a wonderful
shot for an ironmonger, but they don’t care for her very much I believe
—Alec says she’s man-mad, whatever that means, anyhow she seems
desperately keen about Roger.’