Professional Documents
Culture Documents
11 Regulatory Bodies in India - UPSC
11 Regulatory Bodies in India - UPSC
Regulatory bodies are a set of organizations set up by the government to monitor, guide,
and control various sectors such as banking, insurance, education or healthcare. In India, each
industry has its own regulating body. They may or may not be under direct executive
supervision. The FSSAI is in charge of food safety, just as the RBI is in charge of market inflation.
Some other examples of regulatory bodies include Securities and Exchange Board of India
(SEBI), Competition Commission of India (CCI), Small Industries Development Bank of India
(SIDBI), etc.
Regulatory Body
Role of government as a provider and distributor of goods and services or controller of
law and order has been supplanted by many other regulating roles. Changing economic
and social complexity demands an increasingly better form of governance, which can be not
regulated by traditional form of government alone. Hence, many new regulatory bodies are
required to compliment the regulatory functions of conventional government.
In India, constitution empowers state or central legislature to frame laws, in order to
devolve regulating power to autonomous institutions. Article 19 of constitution
empowers legislature to frame laws, with the inkling of “reasonable restrictions”.
These provisions provide the broad set of power to legislating bodies to establish organic
regulating bodies. The Constitution as well as the laws enacted by Parliament has established
the institutions and mechanisms to enforce the laws and rules. Article 53(1) of the
Constitution regulates the exercise of the executive powers of the Union. Further,
Article 53(3) authorizes the Parliament to confer by law such functions to ‘authorities’.
The regulator acts like a mini-state in that it exercises legislative powers in the form of
drafting regulations that are binding on regulated entities; it acts as the executive in its
supervision and enforcement actions; and it performs a quasi-judicial function while assessing
compliance with the law by regulated entities and compliance of processes by the regulator
while imposing penalties on them.
Regulatory agencies are remarkable in featuring a combination of regulation-making
power that is delegated by Parliament, executive functions, and quasi-judicial
functions. In addition, there are sound reasons for favouring significant political and
operational independence in regulatory agencies. In order to obtain sound outcomes, clearly
established un-conflicted objectives, processes governing legislative and executive functions,
bringing in an element of separation of powers for performing quasi judicial functions and
establishing an effective specialised mechanism for substantive judicial review of regulations
and orders are required.
Main Functions
Monetary Authority:
Formulates, implements and monitors the monetary policy.
Objective: maintaining price stability while keeping in mind the objective of growth.
Regulator and supervisor of the financial system:
Prescribes broad parameters of banking operations within which the country’s banking and
financial system functions.
Objective: maintain public confidence in the system, protect depositors’ interest and provide
cost effective banking services to the public.
Manager of Foreign Exchange
Manages the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999.
Objective: to facilitate external trade and payment and promote orderly development and
maintenance of foreign exchange market in India.
Issuer of currency:
Issues and exchanges or destroys currency and coins not fit for circulation.
Objective: to give the public adequate quantity of supplies of currency notes and coins and in
good quality.
Developmental role
Performs a wide range of promotional functions to support national objectives.
Regulator and Supervisor of Payment and Settlement Systems:
Introduces and upgrades safe and efficient modes of payment systems in the country to meet
the requirements of the public at large.
Objective: maintain public confidence in payment and settlement system
Related Functions:
Banker to the Government: performs merchant banking function for the central and the state
governments: also acts as their banker.
Banker to banks: maintains banking accounts of all scheduled banks
Management of Public Debt:
The Reserve Bank manages public debt on behalf of the Central and the State Governments.
It involves issue of new rupee loans, payment of interest and repayment of these loans and
other operational matters such as debt certificates and their registration.
Enforcement Directorate
Directorate of Enforcement is a Multi-Disciplinary Organization mandated with the task
of enforcing the provisions of two special fiscal laws – Foreign Exchange Management
Act, 1999 (FEMA) and Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA).
Besides directly recruiting personnel, the Directorate also draws officers from different
Investigating Agencies, viz. Customs & Central Excise. Income Tax. Police, etc., on
deputation.
With the onset of the process of economic liberalization FERA 1973, which was a regulatory
law was repealed and in its place, effective 1st June, 2000 a new law – Foreign Exchange
Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) came into operation. Further, in tune with the International
Anti Money Laundering regime. Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) was
enacted and entrusted for its enforcement to the Directorate, w.e.f 01-07-2005.
Carved in the role of a multi-dimensional Organisation, the Directorate enforces two laws;
FEMA , a Civil Law having quasi-judicial powers, for investigating suspected contraventions of
the Exchange Control Laws and Regulations with the powers to impose penalties on those
adjudged guilty and PMLA, a Criminal Law, whereby the Officers are empowered to conduct
enquiries to locate, provisionally attach/ confiscate assets derived from acts of Schedules
Offences besides arresting and prosecuting the Money Launderers.
The main functions of the Directorate are as under
Investigate contraventions of the provisions of Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999
(FEMA) which came into force with effect from 1-6-2000. Contraventions of FEMA are
dealt with by way of adjudication by designated authorities of ED and penalties upto
three times the sum involved can be imposed.
Investigate offences of money laundering under the provisions of Prevention of Money
Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) which came into force with effect from 1-7-2005 and to
take actions of attachment and confiscation of property if the same is determined to be
proceeds of crime derived from a Scheduled Offence under PMLA, and to prosecute the
persons involved in the offence of money laundering. There are 156 offences under 28
statutes which are Scheduled Offences under PMLA.
Adjudicate Show Cause Notices issued under the repealed Foreign Exchange
Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA) up to 31-5-2002 for the alleged contraventions of the Act
which may result in imposition of penalties. Pursue prosecutions launched under FERA in
the concerned courts.
Sponsor cases of preventive detention under Conservation of Foreign Exchange and
Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA) in regard to contraventions of
FEMA.
Render cooperation to foreign countries in matters relating to money laundering and
restitution of assets under the provisions of PMLA and to seek cooperation in such
matters.
Recommendations of Financial Sector Legislative Reform Commission (FSLRC)
Need for reform:
The legislative foundation of India’s financial sector is too complex and cumbersome.
These legislations, of which many are out dated – with occasional, piecemeal
amendment, do not provide a holistic framework for the harmonious development of the
financial sector there is an urgent need for an overhaul of the legislativeregulatory
framework of the financial sector.
The regulatory architecture is too fragmented, leaving substantial scope for grey areas
and overlaps, capture and bargaining.
The current architecture is not conducive enough for addressing the issuese manating
from the global context of financial development. Fragmented regulation and regulatory
responsibilities and lack of clarity would hinder both domestic and global co-ordination
efforts in addressing issues of contagion and global financial shocks. There is a need for
strengthening the fundamental architecture in addressing such issues as well as for
evolving a framework for dealing with systemic risk and resolution.
There is a need for strengthening the consumer protection and grievance redress
mechanism in the financial sector. This is particularly important given the low level of
financial literacy, low penetration of financial services, absence of clear regulatory
mandate on composite and complex products and on the roles of product distributors and
financial advisers. Given the complexity of these issues, the main focus was on the
necessity of placing consumer protection at the centre of the philosophy on financial
regulation. This issue needs to be addressed both from the preventive and curative
sides; by the regulators as well as the redress agency, respectively.
The current architecture encourages turf battles and conflicts of interest. This is a result
of the lack of clarity of functions of the various regulatory authorities as well as of
assigning conflicting functions to the same regulatory agency. Despite the explicit
development objectives given to the sector-specific regulators, market development has
been far from satisfactory as is evidenced in the time-frame on developing products and
systems such as in the corporate bond markets.
While every regulator should encourage competition in their sector, the ultimate
responsibility of managing economy-wide competition issues should be lead to the
Competition Commission. While this would help address many macro-level consumer
issues, such micro-level issues should be addressed by the sector specific regulators
and the grievance redress fora/forum. There should be greater and institutionalised,
interface between the Competition Commission and sectoral regulators in promoting
competition and competition practices and culture.
Key principles:
Accountability is best achieved when an agency has a clear purpose. The traditional
Indian notion, that a regulator has powers over a sector but lacks specific objectives and
accountability mechanisms is an unsatisfactory one.
Conflicts of interest in particular, direct conflicts of interest are harmful for accountability
and must be avoided.
A complete picture of firms A financial regulatory architecture that enables a
comprehensive.
View of complex multi-product firms and thus a full understanding of the risks that they
take is desirable.
Avoiding sectoral regulators When a financial regulator works on a sector, there is a
possibility of an alignment coming about between the goals of the sector (growth and
profitability) and the goals of the regulator. The regulator then tends to advocate policy
directions which are conducive for the growth of its sector. Such problems are less likely
to arise when a regulatory agency works towards an economic purpose such as
consumer protection across all or at least many sectors.
Economies of scale in Government agencies In India, there is a paucity of talent and
domain expertise in Government, and constructing a large number of agencies is
relatively difficult from a staffing perspective. It is efficient to place functions that require
correlated skills into a single agency.
Transition issues is useful to envision a full transition into a set of small and
implementable measures.
The Commission proposes a financial regulatory architecture financial regulatory
architecture featuring seven agencies. This proposal features seven agencies and is
hence not a ‘unified financial regulator’ proposal. The existing RBI will continue to exist,
though with modified functions:
The existing SEBI, FMC, IRDA and PFRDA will be merged into a new unified
agency.
The existing Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) will be subsumed into the FSAT.
The existing Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation of India
(DICGC)will be subsumed into the Resolution Corporation.
A new Financial Redressal Agency (FRA) will be created.
A new Debt Management OICE will be created.
The existing FSDC will continue to exist, though with modified functions and a
statutory framework.
Following functions are proposed:
Reserve Bank of India: It is proposed that RBI will perform three functions; monetary
policy, regulation and supervision of banking in enforcing the proposed consumer
protection law and the proposed micro-prudential law, and regulation and supervision of
payment systems in enforcing these two laws.
Unified Financial Agency: The unified financial regulatory agency would implement the
consumer protection law and micro-prudential law for all financial firms other than
banking and payments. This would yield benefits in terms of economies of scope and
scale in the financial system; it would reduce the identification of the regulatory agency
with one sector; it would help address the difficulties of finding the appropriate talent in
Government agencies. This proposed unified financial regulatory agency would also take
over the work on organised financial trading from RBI in the areas connected with the
Bond-Currency Derivatives Nexus and from FMC for commodity futures, thus giving a
unification of all organised financial trading including equities, government bonds,
currencies, commodity futures and corporate bonds. The unification of regulation and
supervision of financial firms such as mutual funds, insurance companies and a diverse
array of firms which are not banks or payment providers, would yield consistent treatment
in consumer protection and micro-prudential regulation across all of them.
Financial Sector Appellate Tribunal: The present SAT will be subsumed in FSAT, which
will hear appeals against RBI for its regulatory functions, the unified financial agency,
decisions of the FRA and some elements of the work of the resolution corporation.
Resolution Corporation: The present DICGC will be subsumed into the Resolution
Corporation which will work across the financial system. Financial Redressal Agency:
The FRA is a new agency which will have to be created in implementing this financial
regulatory architecture. It will setup a nationwide machinery to become a one stop shop
where consumers can carry complaints against all financial firms.
Public Debt Management Agency: An independent debt management office is
envisioned.
Financial Stability and Development Council: Finally, the existing FSDC will become a
agency and have modified functions in the fields of systemic risk and development.
Role of BEE
BEE co-ordinates with designated consumers, designated agencies and other organizations and
recognize, identify and utilize the existing resources and infrastructure, in performing the functions
assigned to it under the Energy Conservation Act. The Energy Conservation Act provides for
regulatory and promotional functions.
Functions
Framing of Regulations to lay down the Standards and guidelines in relation to articles of food
and specifying appropriate system of enforcing various standards thus notified.
Laying down mechanisms and guidelines for accreditation of certification bodies engaged in
certification of food safety management system for food businesses.
Laying down procedure and guidelines for accreditation of laboratories and notification of the
accredited laboratories.
To provide scientific advice and technical support to Central Government and State
Governments in the matters of framing the policy and rules in areas which have a direct or
indirect bearing of food safety and nutrition.
Collect and collate data regarding food consumption, incidence and prevalence of biological
risk, contaminants in food, residues of various, contaminants in foods products, identification
of emerging risks and introduction of rapid alert system.
Creating an information network across the country so that the public, consumers,
Panchayats etc receive rapid, reliable and objective information about food safety and issues
of concern.
Provide training programmes for persons who are involved or intend to get involved in food
businesses.
Contribute to the development of international technical standards for food, sanitary and
phytosanitary standards.
Promote general awareness about food safety and food standards.
Power of ASCI
ASCI’s role has been acclaimed by various agencies including the Government. However, it
lacked the force of legal recognition. The Government of India has at last, taken note of this
and by one stroke on 2nd August 2006 vide a notification in The Gazette of India: Extraordinary
{Part II -sec. 3(i)|, made sure that at least as far as TV Commercials go, they abide by ASCI code.
The amendment made in Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994 through a Notification dated
August 2nd, 2006 now states: “(9) No advertisement which violates the Code for Self-Regulation
in Advertising, as adopted by the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI), Mumbai for public
exhibition in India, from time to time, shall be carried in the cable service”
Key Recommendations
Regulation only where necessary .
Regulation to be effective .
Self-regulation is the best form of regulation.
Regulatory procedures to be simple transparent and citizen friendly.
Involving citizens groups, professional organizations in the regulation activities.
Besides general guidelines to direct the interaction between government departments and
regulatory bodies also chart out general guidelines outlining the general roles and objective of
regulator.
Need for greater uniformity in the terms of structure, appointment, tenure and removal of
various regulatory authorities.
Well qualified selection committee to select the candidate for appointment chairman and
board members.
Their tenure should be secure, so that they can perform their task independently and
without much pressure.
Parliamentary oversight through departmental standing parliamentary committee, will
ensure proper accountability.
The annual reports of the regulators should include a report on their performance of
independent regulator and should be update periodically.
Impact assessment by the external agency.