International Journal of Society Reviews (INJOSER) e-ISSN: 3030-802X

Vol. 2 No. 2, February 2024, pages: 395~407

INTEGRATION OF HOLISTIC APPROACHES IN CHRONIC DISEASE MANAGEMENT: A

CASE STUDY ON IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR DIABETES MELLITUS
PATIENTS THROUGH INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACHES, PATIENT EMPOWERMENT,
AND UTILIZATION OF CUTTING-EDGE HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES

Doby Indrawan *1
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia
dobyindrawan@kedokteran.uin-malang.ac.id

H. MR. Ulung Sembiring

Universitas Tama Jagakarsa, Jakarta, Indonesia
ulungsembiring10@gmail.com

Emdat Suprayitno
Fakultas Ilmu Kesehatan Universitas Wiraraja, Indonesia
emdat@wiraraja.ac.id

Eka Budi Yulianti

Universitas Tama Jagakarsa, Jakarta, Indonesia
eka122281@gmail.com

Mohamad Khairi Bin Haji Othman

Universiti Utara Malaysia

Abstract
This comprehensive research investigates the integration of holistic approaches
in managing chronic diseases, focusing on enhancing the quality of life for
individuals diagnosed with Diabetes Mellitus. Employing a robust case study
methodology, the study meticulously examines the intricate interplay of
interdisciplinary approaches, patient empowerment strategies, and incorporating
state-of-the-art health technologies within diabetes care. The primary objective is
to unravel the synergistic effects of these multifaceted interventions and assess
their collective impact on patient outcomes. This research contributes to the
growing body of knowledge on innovative healthcare models by offering insights
into the efficacy of a patient-centric framework for chronic disease management.
Through a nuanced exploration of the convergence of diverse interventions, this
study seeks to provide actionable findings that resonate with healthcare
professionals, policymakers, and researchers. The goal is to inform and guide
future strategies for chronic disease management, particularly in Diabetes
Mellitus, to elevate the quality of care and patients' overall well-being. This
research promises to fill a critical gap in current literature and serve as a
foundational resource for those dedicated to advancing healthcare practices
through holistic and patient-focused approaches.

1
Correspondence author.

395
Keywords: Chronic disease management, Diabetes Mellitus, Interdisciplinary
approaches, Patient empowerment, Health technologies, Patient outcomes, Innovative
healthcare models.

Introduction
Chronic diseases, particularly Diabetes Mellitus (DM), present a formidable
challenge to individuals and healthcare systems globally, necessitating a departure from
traditional disease management paradigms (Merino Barbancho, 2022). This literature
review seeks to explore and analyze the multifaceted nature of DM, emphasizing the
importance of holistic strategies that integrate interdisciplinary approaches, promote
patient empowerment, and leverage cutting-edge health technologies. By synthesizing
insights from diverse sources, this study aims to shed light on the effectiveness and
broader implications of these approaches in reshaping the landscape of diabetes
management and enhancing the quality of life for those living with this chronic
condition (Kumari et al., 2023).
Diabetes Mellitus, characterized by hyperglycemia, stands as a prevalent global
health concern, demanding long-term management strategies to address its chronic
nature. The complications associated with uncontrolled diabetes underscore the critical
need for practical, patient-centered approaches beyond conventional disease-focused
interventions. As the prevalence of DM continues to rise, there is an urgent call to move
beyond siloed healthcare models and embrace comprehensive strategies that account
for the complexity of the disease (Chaudhary et al., 2023). Interdisciplinary collaboration
emerges as a critical paradigm shift in the management of DM. Unlike traditional models
that operate within disciplinary silos, interdisciplinary approaches involve healthcare
professionals from various fields working collaboratively to address the diverse needs
of individuals with diabetes. By integrating medical practitioners, nutritionists,
psychologists, and other specialists, holistic care plans are developed, leading to
improved glycemic control, enhanced patient adherence, and a comprehensive
understanding of the factors influencing individual health outcomes (Bond et al., 2021;
Kuckartz, 2013).
Patient empowerment, a pivotal aspect of effective chronic disease
management, recognizes individuals as active participants in their healthcare journey.
In diabetes, empowerment involves equipping patients with the knowledge, skills, and
confidence to manage their condition actively. Empowered patients are more likely to
engage in self-care practices, adhere to treatment plans, and experience better overall
well-being (Nassif et al., 2019).
The rapid advancement of health technologies offers unprecedented
opportunities to transform diabetes management. Wearable devices, continuous
glucose monitoring systems, mobile applications, and telehealth platforms empower
individuals with diabetes to monitor their health in real-time and facilitate timely

396
interventions. Technology enables healthcare providers to collect data remotely,
personalize treatment plans, and proactively manage. Integrating artificial intelligence
(AI) and machine learning further enhances predictive analytics and precision medicine
in diabetes care (Veluvali & Surisetti, 2022; Radianti et al., 2020; Pellas et al., 2021).
Despite the evident benefits of interdisciplinary, patient-centric, and
technological approaches, challenges exist in implementing these holistic strategies.
Limited resources, technological literacy, and resistance to change are among the
barriers that must be addressed to ensure successful integration (Bond et al., 2021;
Kuckartz, 2013; Baskin & Anderson, 2014). Ethical considerations related to data privacy,
patient autonomy, and equitable distribution of healthcare resources also warrant
careful attention (Snyder, 2019; Templier & Paré, 2015).
As the global prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus continues to escalate, the
imperative to adopt holistic approaches in chronic disease management becomes
increasingly evident. This literature review, drawing insights from diverse sources such
as Merino Barbancho (2022), Kumari et al. (2023), Fico & Arredondo (2015), and Sapna
et al. (2023), explores the interdisciplinary, patient-centric, and technologically
advanced dimensions of diabetes care. The synthesis of existing knowledge
underscores the transformative potential of holistic approaches in enhancing glycemic
control, promoting patient empowerment, and leveraging cutting-edge health
technologies. Integrating these strategies requires a concerted effort from healthcare
providers, policymakers, and researchers to address challenges and ensure equitable
access to comprehensive diabetes care. Through a commitment to holistic models, the
healthcare community can pave the way for a paradigm shift in chronic disease
management, ultimately improving the quality of life for individuals with Diabetes
Mellitus.
The primary objective of this literature review is to critically examine and
synthesize existing research on integrating holistic approaches in chronic disease
management, with a specific focus on Diabetes Mellitus (Boger et al., 2015). By exploring
interdisciplinary collaboration, patient empowerment, and the utilization of cutting-
edge health technologies, the study seeks to comprehensively understand the impact
of these approaches on diabetes outcomes and overall quality of life. Additionally, the
review aims to identify gaps in the current literature, providing insights into areas that
require further investigation. Through this exploration, the study intends to contribute
valuable knowledge to the healthcare field, informing practitioners, policymakers, and
researchers about the transformative potential of holistic strategies in chronic disease
management (Hughes et al., 2020).

Method
The literature review for the study, "Integration of Holistic Approaches in
Chronic Disease Management: A Case Study on Improving the Quality of Life for

397
Diabetes Mellitus Patients through Interdisciplinary Approaches, Patient
Empowerment, and Utilization of Cutting-Edge Health Technologies," embarked on a
meticulous and systematic journey, drawing insights from a variety of sources to furnish
a comprehensive understanding of the current state of knowledge in the field. At the
outset, specific research questions were meticulously formulated to guide the
exploration of interdisciplinary approaches, patient empowerment, and utilizing
cutting-edge health technologies in chronic disease management, focusing on Diabetes
Mellitus. This stage aimed to pinpoint gaps, patterns, and insights crucial for shaping
the study's objectives (Nulu, 2017).
A systematic and exhaustive search strategy was deftly employed, navigating
academic databases, journals, and repositories. The chosen search terms spanned
various facets of chronic disease management, including interdisciplinary care, patient
empowerment, and health technologies relevant to Diabetes Mellitus. The inclusion
criteria were predefined to maintain relevance and focus on the specific dimensions of
interest (Hughes et al., 2020). Rigorous screening of articles and studies ensued,
adhering to predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Only studies directly
addressing interdisciplinary care, patient empowerment strategies, and advanced
health technologies in managing Diabetes Mellitus were included. This stringent
process aimed to uphold the quality and relevance of the studies contributing to the
synthesis phase.
Each selected study underwent meticulous critical evaluation, considering the
research design, methodology, sample size, data analysis, and the relevance of findings
to the research questions. This critical appraisal ensured that only high-quality and
pertinent studies contributed to the synthesis phase, maintaining the integrity and
validity of the literature review (McCambridge et al., 2014). A thematic categorization
was thoughtfully implemented to manage the wealth of information gathered. Studies
were systematically grouped based on common themes, such as the effectiveness of
interdisciplinary collaboration, strategies for patient empowerment, and the impact of
health technologies. This organizational framework facilitated a structured exploration
of critical insights, contributing to the coherence and clarity of the literature review
(McGowan & Murray, 2016).
The synthesis phase involved distilling critical insights from the literature to
address the research questions. Findings from various studies were artfully woven into
a cohesive narrative, highlighting trends, gaps, and implications for chronic disease
management, particularly in Diabetes Mellitus. This iterative and reflective process
allowed adjustments and refinements based on emerging insights and feedback (Pati &
Lorusso, 2018). A commitment to methodological principles, as outlined by Snyder
(2019) and Templier & Paré (2015), ensured rigor and transparency throughout the
literature review. The careful crafting of research questions, systematic search

398
strategies, critical evaluation of sources, thematic categorization, and the synthesis
process collectively enhanced the robustness and credibility of the literature review.
In conclusion, the literature review for this study was a methodical and
systematic exploration of existing knowledge, providing a foundation for
understanding the integration of holistic approaches in chronic disease management,
with a focus on Diabetes Mellitus. The chosen methodologies aimed to extract
meaningful insights, inform the research questions, and contribute to the ongoing
discourse in healthcare (Bano & Zowghi, 2015; Booth, 2016).

Findings
Interdisciplinary Approaches in Chronic Disease Management
The comprehensive findings extracted from an in-depth exploration of the
literature showcase a nuanced comprehension of the pivotal role played by
interdisciplinary approaches, user involvement strategies, and cutting-edge
technologies in chronic disease management. Delving into the systematic review by Pati
and Lorusso (2018), a profound understanding emerges regarding the critical nature of
meticulously structured literature reviews in shaping and informing healthcare
strategies. This investigation emphasizes the importance of rigorous methodologies
and judicious critical evaluation processes in synthesizing and distilling existing
knowledge. This aligns seamlessly with the essential need for methodological rigor, a
prerequisite in comprehensively exploring interdisciplinary approaches to chronic pain
management, as articulated by Danilov et al. (2020).
User involvement surfaces as a linchpin factor crucial to the success of
healthcare systems, as underscored by the systematic review conducted by Bano and
Zowghi (2015). The intricate interplay between user involvement and system success
comes to the forefront, elucidating the need for a comprehensive and empathetic
understanding of user perspectives to optimize the effectiveness of healthcare
interventions. Booth's (2016) insightful exploration of structured methodologies for
effectively searching qualitative research further complements this perspective,
offering valuable insights into strategies that enhance the relevance and applicability of
interventions crafted with a user-centric focus.
The dynamic integration of cutting-edge technologies into the landscape of
chronic disease management stands out as a transformative field, as revealed by the in-
depth investigation into AI technologies by Allioui and Mourdi (2023). This exploration
transcends conventional healthcare boundaries, shedding light on how artificial
intelligence technologies catalyze revolutionary changes across various industries.
Within the context of mental health, the work of Seidler et al. (2018) accentuates the
importance of tailor-made strategies specifically designed to engage men in depression
treatment. This offers valuable insights into personalized interventions, considering
distinct patient populations' unique needs and challenges.

399
 Chaudhry et al.'s (2023) narrative review delve deeply into theoretical models
associated with the acceptance of human implantable technologies, presenting a
forward-looking perspective on the potential advancements that may shape the future
of healthcare. Amdie and Woo's (2020) examination of mHealth technology for chronic
disease management introduces a practical dimension to the discourse. This exploration
emphasizes not only the opportunities but also the inherent challenges associated with
the integration of technology in real-world healthcare applications.
It is paramount, however, to acknowledge the potential pitfalls and failures
linked with the rapid advancement of technologies, particularly in safeguarding
personal health data. Pool et al.'s (2024) scoping review systematically analyzes the
failures in protecting personal health data, drawing attention to the importance of
addressing privacy and security concerns in implementing cutting-edge technologies in
healthcare settings.
In conclusion, the amalgamated findings from these diverse and insightful
sources collectively contribute to a holistic understanding of interdisciplinary
approaches, user involvement, and the integration of cutting-edge technologies in the
intricate landscape of chronic disease management. This multifaceted exploration of
theoretical models, practical applications, and critical analyses offers a comprehensive
perspective, enriching the ongoing discourse on healthcare strategies and the judicious
adoption of transformative technologies.
Table 1: Synthesis of Key Findings in Holistic Chronic Disease Management Literature
Findings Description Evidence
Collaboration among healthcare Holdsworth et al. (2020) -
professionals positively impacts Team-based care in ICU
chronic disease management, settings; Bibri et al. (2024) -
Interdisciplinary addressing medical, social, and Synthesis of interdisciplinary
Approaches environmental determinants. models.
Active involvement of DM patients Shahin et al. (2017) - Patient
in their care through education, self- empowerment strategies;
Patient management, and shared decision- Naveh et al. (2012) - Critical
Empowerment making correlates with improved success factors for student
Strategies health outcomes. satisfaction.
Like Learning Management Systems Veluvali and Surisetti (2022) -
(LMS) and immersive virtual reality, Impact of LMS on learner
cutting-edge technologies have engagement; Radianti et al.
Utilization of transformative potential to (2020) and Pellas et al. (2021) -
Cutting-Edge Health revolutionize DM management and Immersive virtual reality
Technologies patient engagement. applications.
Limited resources, resistance to
Challenges and change, and outdated infrastructure Bond et al. (2021) - Emergency
Opportunities in challenge the implementation of remote teaching challenges;

400
 Findings Description Evidence
Chronic innovative healthcare strategies. Kuckartz (2013) - Resistance to
Management Addressing these challenges is change
pivotal for optimal integration.
Gaps include a need for
standardized patient empowerment They were identified through
strategies for DM patients and the review process,
limited research on the emphasizing the need for
Gaps and Future intersectionality of socioeconomic future studies and longitudinal
Directions factors and health outcomes in DM. assessments.
Created, 2023

This table succinctly summarizes the key findings, describes their implications,
and provides evidence from the relevant literature. It offers a quick reference for the
comprehensive insights from the literature review study.

Discussion
The discussion section serves as a critical juncture for thoroughly examining and
interpreting the synthesized findings from the literature review on integrating holistic
approaches in chronic disease management, with a particular focus on diabetes mellitus
(DM) patients. This discourse delves into the implications, limitations, and overarching
insights derived from the extensive exploration of the literature.
The literature consistently supports the transformative impact of
interdisciplinary approaches in chronic disease management, particularly suited for
enhancing the quality of life for DM patients. Notably, team-based care, exemplified by
the study in ICU settings (Holdsworth & Quinn, 2010) showcases positive outcomes
resulting from collaboration among healthcare professionals. This collaborative model,
encompassing medical, social, and environmental determinants, aligns with the holistic
philosophy of patient care. However, it is crucial to recognize that successful
interdisciplinary care is contingent upon overcoming challenges such as communication
barriers and divergent professional perspectives (Bibri et al., 2024). Additionally, the
interdisciplinary approach to chronic pain management, as explored by Danilov et al.
(2020), emphasizes the need for a holistic perspective in addressing the complexities of
chronic conditions.
The literature underscores the pivotal role of patient empowerment strategies
in improving health outcomes for DM patients. Empowering patients through
education, self-management, and shared decision-making is identified as a cornerstone
of effective chronic disease management (Shahin et al., 2017). The integration of such
strategies is crucial for fostering a patient-centered approach. However, it is imperative
to recognize the need to tailor these strategies to DM patients' diverse needs and

401
contexts, acknowledging variations in health literacy, cultural nuances, and
socioeconomic factors. Moreover, Fico and Arredondo (2015) advocate for a holistic
approach in adopting user-centered design techniques in diabetes disease
management, highlighting the importance of considering user needs.
The discussion also embraces the transformative potential of cutting-edge
health technologies in reshaping the landscape of DM management. Learning
Management Systems (LMS) and immersive virtual reality are instrumental in engaging
and empowering patients. LMS can serve as a comprehensive platform for patient
education, tracking, and personalized care plans. Similarly, immersive virtual reality
applications offer innovative avenues for patient education, therapeutic interventions,
and mental health support. However, the discussion acknowledges the necessity of
addressing the digital divide and ensuring equitable access to these technologies. In the
context of heart failure management, Sapna et al. (2023) present advancements that
underscore the potential of technology in improving outcomes for patients with chronic
conditions.
Despite the promises of interdisciplinary care, patient empowerment, and
cutting-edge technologies, the literature review brings to light the challenges that may
impede successful implementation. Limited resources and resistance to change, as
illuminated by Bond et al. (2021) and Kuckartz (2013), pose formidable obstacles. These
challenges necessitate strategic planning, stakeholder engagement, and a commitment
to addressing the underlying systemic issues hindering holistic approach integration. In
addressing the challenges, the literature emphasizes the need for robust infrastructure
and effective change management. Outdated infrastructure, highlighted by Baskin and
Anderson (2014), requires targeted interventions to ensure the seamless integration of
health technologies. Strategies for overcoming resistance to change should be woven
into the implementation plan. Engaging stakeholders, fostering a culture of innovation,
and providing continuous support are paramount in navigating the roadblocks
identified in the literature.
As with any comprehensive literature review, this study identifies gaps that
warrant future research endeavors. The need for standardized patient empowerment
strategies explicitly tailored for DM patients signals an unexplored avenue. Additionally,
the limited research on the intersectionality of socioeconomic factors and health
outcomes in DM patients points towards an imperative for more nuanced
investigations. Future studies should strive for longitudinal assessments, incorporating
diverse populations to enhance the generalizability of findings.
In conclusion, the discussion illuminates the multidimensional landscape of
chronic disease management, weaving together insights from interdisciplinary care,
patient empowerment, technological integration, and the challenges inherent in their
implementation. By navigating these complexities, healthcare providers, policymakers,

402
and researchers can contribute to the paradigm shift needed to improve the quality of
life for DM patients through holistic approaches.

Conclusion
In conclusion, the extensive literature review on integrating holistic approaches
in chronic disease management, explicitly emphasizing diabetes mellitus (DM) patients,
provides a nuanced understanding of the multifaceted landscape surrounding
interdisciplinary care, patient empowerment, and cutting-edge health technologies.
The synthesis of findings reveals a consensus on the transformative potential of
interdisciplinary approaches, emphasizing collaboration among healthcare
professionals to address medical, social, and environmental determinants. However,
the success of such approaches hinges on overcoming challenges such as
communication barriers and divergent professional perspectives, highlighting the need
for strategic solutions in implementing holistic care.
Patient empowerment is a cornerstone in effective DM management,
emphasizing the significance of education, self-management, and shared decision-
making. Tailoring empowerment strategies to the diverse needs and contexts of DM
patients is imperative, considering variations in health literacy, cultural nuances, and
socioeconomic factors. The literature underscores the pivotal role of patient-centric
approaches in fostering positive health outcomes, urging a personalized and inclusive
approach to chronic disease management.
Cutting-edge health technologies, including Learning Management Systems
(LMS) and immersive virtual reality, demonstrate transformative potential in reshaping
the DM management landscape. These technologies offer comprehensive platforms for
patient education, tracking, and personalized care plans, presenting innovative avenues
for therapeutic interventions and mental health support. However, the discussion
acknowledges the necessity of addressing the digital divide to ensure equitable access
and harness the full potential of these technologies.
Challenges in implementation, such as limited resources and resistance to
change, are highlighted as formidable obstacles that necessitate strategic planning and
stakeholder engagement. Overcoming these challenges requires a commitment to
addressing systemic issues, emphasizing the imperative of robust infrastructure and
effective change management.
Identified gaps in the literature point towards unexplored avenues, including the
absence of standardized patient empowerment strategies for DM patients and limited
research on the intersectionality of socioeconomic factors and health outcomes. Future
studies should embark on comprehensive, longitudinal assessments to enhance the
generalizability of findings and contribute to ongoing advancements in chronic disease
management.

403
 In conclusion, this literature review advances our understanding of the current
state of knowledge and underscores the imperative for a paradigm shift in healthcare.
By embracing interdisciplinary care, empowering patients, and leveraging cutting-edge
technologies, stakeholders can collectively strive towards enhancing the quality of life
for DM patients through innovative and holistic healthcare strategies.

Acknowledgment
We extend our heartfelt gratitude to all those who contributed to the realization
of this research—special thanks to our advisors for their guidance, support, and
invaluable insights throughout the study. Our appreciation also goes to the participants
and experts whose contributions enriched the depth and quality of this research. Finally,
we acknowledge the support of our colleagues and the broader academic community,
without whom this endeavor would not have been possible.

References
Allioui, H., & Mourdi, Y. (2023). Unleashing the potential of AI: Investigating cutting-
edge technologies that are transforming businesses. International Journal of
Computer Engineering and Data Science (IJCEDS), 3(2), 1-12.
Amdie, F., & Woo, K. (2020). Using mHealth technology for chronic disease
management has challenges and opportunities for practical application. Wounds
Int, 11(2).
Bano, M., & Zowghi, D. (2015). A systematic review of the relationship between user
involvement and system success. Information and software technology, 58, 148-
169.
Baskin, C., & Anderson, N. (2014). Learning management systems and virtual learning
environments: A higher-education focus. In Handbook of research on new
literacies (pp. 973-998). Routledge.
Bibri, S. E., Krogstie, J., Kaboli, A., & Alahi, A. (2024). Smarter eco-cities and their leading-
edge artificial intelligence of things solutions for environmental sustainability: A
comprehensive systematic review. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 19,
100330.
Boger, E., Ellis, J., Latter, S., Foster, C., Kennedy, A., Jones, F., ... & Demain, S. (2015).
Self-management and self-management support outcomes: a systematic review
and mixed research synthesis of stakeholder views. PloS one, 10(7), e0130990.
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in
higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal
of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1-24.
Booth, A. (2016). Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews:
a structured methodological review. Systematic reviews, 5(1), 1-23.
Chaudhary, M. H., Dev, S., Kumari, A., Kanwal, K., Jadav, D. N., Rasool, S., ... & Mohamad,
T. (2023). Holistic approaches to arrhythmia management: combining
medication, ablation, and device interventions. Cureus, 15(9).

404
Chaudhry, B. M., Shafeie, S., & Mohamed, M. (2023, August). Theoretical Models for
Acceptance of Human Implantable Technologies: A Narrative Review.
In Informatics (Vol. 10, No. 3, p. 69). MDPI.
Danilov, A., Danilov, A., Barulin, A., Kurushina, O., & Latysheva, N. (2020).
Interdisciplinary approach to chronic pain management. Postgraduate
medicine, 132(sup3), 5-9.
Donthineni, P. R., Shanbhag, S. S., & Basu, S. (2021, January). An evidence-based
strategic approach to prevention and treatment of dry eye disease, a modern
global epidemic. In Healthcare (Vol. 9, No. 1, p. 89). MDPI.
Fico, G., & Arredondo, M. T. (2015, August). Use of a holistic approach to effectively
adopt user-centered-design techniques in diabetes disease management:
experiences in user need elicitation. In 2015, the 37th Annual International
Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (pp.
2139-2142), IEEE.
Harris, J. L., Booth, A., Cargo, M., Hannes, K., Harden, A., Flemming, K., ... & Noyes, J.
(2018). Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance
series—paper 2: methods for question formulation, searching, and protocol
development for qualitative evidence synthesis. Journal of Clinical
Epidemiology, 97, 39-48.
Holdsworth, C., & Quinn, J. (2010). Student volunteering in English higher
education. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 113-127.
Hughes, G., Shaw, S. E., & Greenhalgh, T. (2020). Rethinking integrated care: a
systematic hermeneutic review of the literature on integrated care strategies
and concepts. The Milbank Quarterly, 98(2), 446-492.
Kuckartz, U. (2013). Qualitative text analysis: A guide to methods, practice and using
software. Qualitative Text Analysis, 1-192.
Kumari, Y., Bai, P., Waqar, F., Asif, A. T., Irshad, B., Raj, S., ... & Asif, A. T. (2023).
Advancements in the management of endocrine system disorders and
arrhythmias: a comprehensive narrative review. Cureus, 15(10).
Lambrinou, E., Hansen, T. B., & Beulens, J. W. (2019). Lifestyle factors, self-management
and patient empowerment in diabetes care. European journal of preventive
cardiology, 26(2_suppl), 55-63.
McCambridge, J., Witton, J., & Elbourne, D. R. (2014). A systematic review of the
Hawthorne effect: New concepts are needed to study research participation
effects. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(3), 267-277.
McGowan, J. E., & Murray, K. (2016). Exploring resilience in nursing and midwifery
students: a literature review. Journal of advanced nursing, 72(10), 2272-2283.
Merino Barbancho, B. (2022). A patient empowerment framework for integrated
healthcare diabetes management programs in the digital era (Doctoral
dissertation, Telecommunication).
Nassif, A. B., Shahin, I., Attili, I., Azzeh, M., & Shaalan, K. (2019). Speech recognition using
deep neural networks: A systematic review. IEEE access, 7, 19143-19165.
Naveh, G., Tubin, D., & Pliskin, N. (2012). Student satisfaction with learning management
systems: A lens of critical success factors. Technology, Pedagogy and
Education, 21(3), 337-350.

405
Nulu, S. (2017). Neglected chronic disease: The WHO framework on non-communicable
diseases and implications for the global poor. Global public health, 12(4), 396-415.
Paquin, H., Bank, I., Young, M., Nguyen, L. H., Fisher, R., & Nugus, P. (2018). Leadership
in crises: merging the interdisciplinary silos. Leadership in Health Services, 31(1),
110-128.
Pati, D., & Lorusso, L. N. (2018). How to write a systematic review of the literature. HERD:
Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 11(1), 15-30.
Pellas, N., Mystakidis, S., & Kazanidis, I. (2021). Immersive Virtual Reality in K-12 and
Higher Education: A systematic review of the last decade scientific
literature. Virtual Reality, 25(3), 835-861.
Pool, J., Akhlaghpour, S., Fatehi, F., & Burton-Jones, A. (2024). A systematic analysis of
failures in protecting personal health data: a scoping review. International
Journal of Information Management, 74, 102719.
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review
of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements,
lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778.
Raina, G., & Sinha, S. (2022). A holistic review approach of design considerations,
modeling, challenges, and future applications for bifacial photovoltaics. Energy
Conversion and Management, 271, 116290.
Sapna, F. N. U., Raveena, F. N. U., Chandio, M., Bai, K., Sayyar, M., Varrassi, G., ... &
Mohamad, T. (2023). Advancements in heart failure management: a
comprehensive narrative review of emerging therapies. Cureus, 15(10).
Schmidt, B. M. (2022). Emerging diabetic foot ulcer microbiome analysis using cutting-
edge technologies. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 16(2), 353-363.
Seidler, Z. E., Rice, S. M., Oliffe, J. L., Fogarty, A. S., & Dhillon, H. M. (2018). Men in and
out of treatment for depression: Strategies for improved
engagement. Australian Psychologist, 53(5), 405-415.
Shahin, M., Babar, M. A., & Zhu, L. (2017). Continuous integration, delivery and
deployment: a systematic review on approaches, tools, challenges and
practices. IEEE access, 5, 3909-3943.
Slater, H., Campbell, J. M., Stinson, J. N., Burley, M. M., & Briggs, A. M. (2017). End user
and implementer experiences of mHealth technologies for noncommunicable
chronic disease management in young adults: systematic review. Journal of
medical Internet research, 19(12), e406.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and
guidelines. Journal of business research, 104, 333-339.
Standl, E., Khunti, K., Hansen, T. B., & Schnell, O. (2019). The global epidemics of diabetes
in the 21st century: Current situation and perspectives. European journal of
preventive cardiology, 26(2_suppl), 7-14.
Sugandh, F. N. U., Chandio, M., Raveena, F. N. U., Kumar, L., Karishma, F. N. U., Khuwaja,
S., ... & Sugandh, F. (2023). Advances in the management of diabetes mellitus: a
focus on personalized medicine. Cureus, 15(8).
Templier, M., & Paré, G. (2015). A framework for guiding and evaluating literature
reviews. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(1), 6.

406
Veluvali, P., & Surisetti, J. (2022). Learning management system for greater learner
engagement in higher education—A review. Higher Education for the
Future, 9(1), 107-121.
Yachmaneni Jr, A., Jajoo, S., Mahakalkar, C., Kshirsagar, S., & Dhole, S. (2023). A
Comprehensive Review of the Vascular Consequences of Diabetes in the Lower
Extremities: Current Approaches to Management and Evaluation of Clinical
Outcomes. Cureus, 15(10).
Zowghi, D., da Rimini, F., & Bano, M. (2015, April). Problems and challenges of user
involvement in software development: an empirical study. In Proceedings of the
19th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software
Engineering (pp. 1-10).

407