INTERIM REPORT OF

IDENTITY AND GENERAL INFORMATION

Research Title: Analysis of Innovation Readiness Levels from University Research Results
Researchers :
No. Name Position Expertise Institution Allocated
Time
1 Dr. Sugeng Santoso Principal Management Universitas Mercu 6 jam/ minggu
Buana
2 Dr. Lucky Nugroho Member Management Universitas Mercu 6 jam/ minggu
Buana
3 Uli Arta Naibaho, ST Member Management Universitas Mercu 6 jam/ minggu
Buana
4 Ika Apriasty, ST, SPsi. Member Management Universitas Mercu 4 jam/ minggu
Buana
5 Dr. Salmi Mohd. Isa Partner Management USM 4 jam/ minggu
6 Ginanjar Dewandaru, PhD Member Policy KNEKS 4 jam/ minggu
7 M. Ramadhani Marfatah, Member Policy Kemenko Marves 4 jam/ minggu
SKel
8 R. Nur Hidayat, SE, Ak., Member Policy BRIN 4 jam/ minggu
CA., MEc.Dev.

1. Research Object (type of materials): Analysis of Innovation Readiness Levels from

University Research Results
2. Time/Period
Starts : Month:February Year, 2024
Ends : Month:September Year, 2024
3. Proposed Budget:
Universitas Mercu Buana Rp. 20.000.000,-
Partner Rp. ,-
4. Research Location (lab/studio/field): DKI Jakarta and East Jawa
5. Research Partner (if any, mention its contribution): National Research and Innovation
Agency, Tourism and Creative Economy Ministry, Brawijaya University and Coordinating
Ministry for Maritime Affairs and Investment, which coordinates the development of
creative economy ecosystem. The targeted findings (explanation, method, theory, or
anticipation contributed to the field of study)
6. The basic contribution to the field of study (explain in not more than 50 words, focus on
original and fundamental ideas supporting the development of science and technology):
Analysis of Innovation Readiness Levels from University Research Results
7. The targeted journals (write the name of the international journal, accredited national
journal, or non-accredited, and state the year of publication:
Accredited National Publ. 2./ Iqtishoduna.
8. Plan for Intellectual Property Right, book, prototype or other targeted outcomes, the
targeted year or the completion year.

3
 TABLE OF CONTENT

Table of Content................................................................................................................4
List of Figures...................................................................................................................5
List of Tables.....................................................................................................................6
Summary...........................................................................................................................7
A. Introduction............................................................................................................7
a. Background and Formulation............................................................................7
b. Problem-Solving Approaches...........................................................................7
c. State of The Art And Novelty...........................................................................7
d. Research Roadmap For The Next 5 Years........................................................7
e. Plan of Output Targets......................................................................................7
f. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)...........................................................7
g. University's Key Performance Indicators (KPI)...............................................7
B. Literature Review...................................................................................................9
C. Method.................................................................................................................10
D. Results of Research Implementation....................................................................12
E. Output Status........................................................................................................16
F. The Role of Partner..............................................................................................16
G. Research Implementation Obstacles....................................................................17
H. Bibliography.........................................................................................................17
Attachment......................................................................................................................20

4
 LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Measurement of Technology Readiness Level (TRL) in Higher Education..............8
Figure 2. IRL Level Measurement Data in Higher Education...................................................8
Figure 3. IRL relationship with TRL.........................................................................................8
Figure 4. Figure 4. Research Framework Flowchart................................................................11
Figure 5. IRL Measurement Flowchart....................................................................................11
Figure 6. FGD with researchers at Brawijaya University Malang...........................................12
Figure 7. Measurement Results of IRL-2 Tedako Products.....................................................13
Figure 8. Results of Percentage Calculation of Aspects IRL-2 Tedako Products....................13
Figure 9. Measurement Results of TRL-6 Tedako Products....................................................14
Figure 10. Measurement Results of IRL-2 Spices Gummy Products......................................14
Figure 11. Results of Percentage Calculation of Aspects IRL-2 Spices Gummy Products.....14
Figure 12. Measurement Results of TRL-6 Spices Gummy Products.....................................15
Figure 13. Measurement Results of IRL-3 Kombucha Products.............................................15
Figure 14. Results of Percentage Calculation of Aspects IRL-3 Kombucha Products............16
Figure 15. Measurement Results of TRL-9 Kombucha Products............................................16

5
 LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Faculty's Leading Research..........................................................................................9

6
 Substance of the Proposal
SCHEMA International Research Collaboration – Research
Instructions: Applicants are only permitted to fill in the space provided in accordance
with the filling instructions and are not permitted to modify the template or delete
any sections

TITLE
Write the title of the proposal

Analysis of Innovation Readiness Levels from University Research Results.

SUMMARY
A summary of no more than 300 words containing the urgency, goals, and targeted outputs as well as a
description of the level of readiness of the proposed research technology.

Understanding and implementation of the Innovation Readiness Level (IRL) as a result of higher education
research has not yet been implemented as massively as the Technology Readiness Level (TRL). The aim of
the research is to develop an innovation ecosystem through a culture of measuring the level of innovation
readiness so that it is linked to user needs. Research was carried out through assessment and analysis of IRL
and TRL. The method used is a participatory approach through Focus Group Discussion (FGD), where
discussions are held with stakeholders to find out IRL and TRL assessments from research results related to
halal food, drinks and halal cosmetics. The results of the assessment are recommendations to increase the IRL
& TRL level so that there is a linkage with user needs through strategy and intermediation.

KEYWORDS
Keywords maximum 5 words, separated by semicolon marks (;)

Innovation Readiness Level, Intermediation, Research Results, Users, University.

A. Introduction
In this chapter described, (a) the background and formulation of the problem to be researched the
selection of research topics to reveal a symptom / concept / conjecture, and the basis for arguments that
strengthen the importance of research, as well as clear problem formulation, (b) Problem-solving
approaches and concepts to answer problems, testing hypotheses or conjectures to be proven, (c) State of the
art and novelty presented, state of the art in the topic studied, previous research studies that are up to date
and relevant to the proposed research theme, references are preferred to be sourced from scientific journals
covering at least 70% of all references, (d) The research roadmap for the next 5 years is described and
reviewed the suitability of the research proposal with the UMB Research Master Plan (RIP), especially in
terms of the Research Roadmap, (e) plan of output targets to be achieved, (f) Sustainable Development
Goals (SDGs) and (g) the University's Key Performance Indicators (KPI) need to be linked to the
proposed research. Researchers determine the leading areas and topics relevant to the roadmap. Thus
research can explain the synergy between research groups built to produce targeted innovations. Also explain
the proposed research contribution in supporting the achievement of the UMB Research Strategic Plan.
Background and problem formulation. This study uses the Innovation Readiness Levels-Meter software,
which is a method that can estimate the innovation readiness of an innovation program for companies,
research and development institutions and universities viewed from several aspects, such as technology,
market, organization, partnership, manufacturing, risk and investment. Innovation does not have to be radical
or occur exclusively for the product. Innovation isn't just for big organizations; innovation is as relevant for
government/local government as it is for business (Andrea, G., Santoso, S. (2020), Santoso, S.; Natanael, A.;
Griselda, A.; Khoirunnisa, J.; Simanjuntak, M.; Bagus, A. R.; Merry, L. Z. (2021b)). In an organizational
context, innovation can occur in products, processes, or services (Sugeng Santoso, Syafaat Pradipta, Trubus
Sumantono, Ari Ana Fatmawati (2021)). It can be incremental or radical, and it can occur at multiple levels
of the organization, from management groups and departments to project requirements and even individuals.”
Innovation Readiness Levels-Meter is software that collects 7 main aspects in which there are standard
statements for each IRL. There are 6 Innovation Readiness Levels (IRL), namely concept, component,

7
completion, gap, competition, and moving or quitting.

Figure 1. Measurement of Technology Readiness Level (TRL) in Higher Education.

Source: https://risbang.ristekdikti.go.id/layanan/tingkat-kesiapterapan-teknologi

Figure 2. TRL Level Measurement Data in Higher Education.

Source: https://risbang.ristekdikti.go.id/layanan/tingkat-kesiapterapan-teknologi

So far IRL is not well known in the majority of universities and the requirement for research is TRL which is
Permenristekdikti No. 42 of 2016. IRL is Permenristekdikti No.29 of 2019. Both TRL and IRL are related to
Law no. 11 of 2019 National Science and Technology System.
Researchers will discuss the implementation of IRL in several studies conducted by lecturers at one of the
state universities in East Java as listed in Figure 1 and Figure 2 above.

TRL 1-3 TKT 4-6 TKT 7-9

Figure 3. IRL's relationship with TRL.

8
 Source: Permenristekdikti Number 29 of 2019, processed.

From figure 3 it can be seen that IRL 1 consists of IRL 1, 2 and 3; IRL 2 consists of IRL 4, 5, 6 and
IRL 3 consists of IRL 7, 8, 9.
a) Problem Solving Approach
Problem Solving Approach using Grand theory of innovation systems (Santoso, S.; Natanael, A.;
Fatmawati, A.A.; Griselda, A.; Khoirunnisa, J.; Simanjuntak, M.; Bagus, A. A. R. (2021a)). The
research method used is a qualitative approach through key informant interviews, field surveys,
interviews with related parties and documentation analysis, which holistically covers various aspects
of agribusiness innovation that have been implemented.
b) State of the art and novelty
cooperation in innovation services, incubation, curation, downstream innovation business of
lecturers/students/partners etc. which work in an innovation system and between
fields/faculties/departments/specialties interacting to achieve common goals that produce added
value, outcomes and impact (Lovika, A., Burhanuddin, B., Santoso, S., & Praktikno, I. (2022).)
c) Research roadmap for the next 5 years
If referred to the research Roadmap for the Faculty's Leading Research roadmap, it includes Leading
Business Sustainability related to Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Tourism and Hospitality
Management, and Operation and Flexibility Management (Temas (2023).)

Table 1. Faculty's Leading Research

d) Plan of output targets to be achieved

The planned output target is in the form of articles submitted and will be published in the SINTA 2
Accredited Journal (Istiqhoduna Journal)
e) Sustainables Development Goals (SDGs)
This research is in accordance with SDG's Goal 12, namely Responsible Consumption and
Production which is mainly related to the realm/domain of the Ministry of Tourism and Creative
Economy (Kemenparekraf) / Tourism and Creative Economy Agency (Baparekraf)
f) University Key Performance Indicators (KPI)

9
 Based on the UMB RIP, related indicators include the target: number of publications in Istiqhoduna:
national scientific Accredited journals (SINTA 2) / international scientific journals.
B. Literature Review
Grand theory of innovation systems used in ecosystems., Innovation is research, development and/or
engineering activities aimed at developing practical applications of new scientific values and contexts
(Andrea, G., Santoso, S. (2020), Santoso S, Widyanty W, Nurhidajat R, Ramadhani Marfatah M, Mahmud G,
Fahlevi M, Aljuaid M, Zhghenti T and Shahid D (2022),), or new ways to apply existing science and
technology to products or production processes (Sugeng Santoso, R. Nurhidajat, Yayuk Arsih, Adhadi Praja,
Sandi Perdian (2022), Ade, Agung Fachrully; Santoso, Sugeng; Nando Dwi Yulio (2021).). Innovation
Products are products resulting from research and development that have been produced and utilized by users
(Santoso, S.; Nusraningrum, D.; Hadibrata, B.; Widyanty, W.; Isa, S. M.; Apriyanto, Y.; Henny. (2021),
Santoso, S., Donna, L.S.B., Kayani, I., Cahyanugraha, I.H., Arfiandi, D., 63 Aryati., D.. (2023)).

Innovation Readiness Level, hereinafter referred to as IRL, is a method for estimating the Innovation
readiness of an Innovation program in Companies, Research and Development Institutions, and Universities
which is viewed from the aspects of technology, market, organization, partnership, risk, manufacturing, and
investment.

Technology Readiness Level, hereinafter abbreviated as IRL, is the level of maturity or readiness for the
results of technological research and development which are measured systematically so that they can be
adopted by users, whether by government, industry or society (Dumilah, D. Komarudin, M. Ubaidillah, R.
Siagian, S. Susanto, S. (2021), Putra, I.M.Y.;Santoso,S.(2020)). Measurement is the determination of
quantities, dimensions, or capacities against a standard or unit of measurement.

Measurement And Determination Of Innovation Readiness Level based on Minister of Research, Technology
and Higher Education Regulation No. 29/2009. This Ministerial Regulation is a reference for
ministries/institutions, regional governments, universities and industry in measuring and determining IRL for
innovation programs and/or activities. Ministries/institutions, local governments, universities and industry are
required to measure and determine IRL for innovation results. This innovation is an innovation funded by the
government budget or in collaboration with the government. IRL's measurements and determinations aim to
knowing the readiness status or position in the Innovation life cycle reduce the risk of failure in implementing
innovation evaluate the progress of implementing innovation programs or activities encourage the
implementation of Innovation through a systematic planning process starting from idea creation, concept
preparation, to producing Innovation Products that are competitive in the market. IRL's measurement and
determination is carried out by looking at the condition of the Technology Readiness Level status as a
prerequisite that must be met for an innovative product to be ready to enter the market and survive and be
sustainable (Santoso, S., Siswanti, I., Hidayat, R. N., Isa, S. M., & Marfatah, M. R. (2022)).

Understanding and implementation of the Innovation Readiness Level (IRL) as a result of higher education
research has not yet been implemented as massively as the Technology Readiness Level (TRL). The aim of
the research is to develop an innovation ecosystem through a culture of measuring the level of innovation
readiness so that it is linked to user needs. So far IRL/ IRL has not been widely used in most universities as a
research requirement, whereas IRL is more massively used as a research requirement. IRL is a legal product
from Permenristekdikti No.29 of 2019, while TRL is Permenristekdikti No. 42 of 2016. These two policies
are related to Law Number 11 of 2019 concerning the National Science and Technology System.
The following are the 2015-2019 IRL measurements carried out by various universities.

From figure 3 it can be seen that IRL 1 consists of IRL 1, 2 and 3; Katsinow 2 consists of IRL 4, 5, 6 and
IRLa 3 consists of IRL 7, 8, 9. The problem solving approach uses innovation system theory as stated in
policy Law Number. 11 of 2019 concerning the National Science and Technology System. The method used
is a participatory approach through Focus Group Discussion (FGD), where discussions are held with
stakeholders to find out the IRL and TRL assessment of research results related to halal food, drinks and halal
cosmetics. Based on the 2019-2024 Sharia Economic Masterplan, KNEKS is developing a sharia economic
ecosystem through Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which has eight clusters, namely halal food and
beverages, Muslim-friendly tourism, Muslim clothing and fashion, sharia creative economy, halal
pharmaceuticals and cosmetics, renewable energy, sharia finance, and other sharia sectors (Islamic Terms of
Reference Digital Day 2023' National Committee for Sharia Economic and Finance 2023)
C. Method

10
Methods or ways to achieve the goals that have been set are written not exceeding 1000 words. In the chapter
Research Methods described how to achieve research objectives. This chapter is complemented by a Research
Flow Chart that illustrates what has been implemented and achieved previously according to the roadmap. It
would be better if the presentation can be related to the achievements of researchers who can be used as a
reference to continue the research activities that will be proposed and that will be carried out during the
research period. The method must fully explain the clear stages of research, outputs, measurable achievement
indicators at each stage

A qualitative approach with the method used is a participatory approach through Focus Group Discussion
(FGD), where discussions are held with stakeholders to find out IRL and TRL assessments from research
results related to halal food, drinks and halal cosmetics. The FGD involved key informants (Novita et al.,
2022). Data collected by the researchers themselves related to the research being carried out was obtained
through a process of participatory observation and interviews with key informants and main informants.
1. Interview, namely a data collection technique in which the interrogator (researcher or person assigned to
collect data) in collecting information asks questions to the interviewee who knows for sure the actual
situation and conditions of the location (Monica, 2021).
2. Participatory observation; namely as observing patterns of human behavior in certain situations, to obtain
information about the desired phenomenon. Observations are made by coming / investigating the location
directly Wijiharjono, N. (2021).

Figure 4. Figure 4. Research Framework Flowchart.

Source: Researcher, 2024

11
 Figure 5. IRL Measurement Flowchart.
Source : Regulation of the Minister of Research, Technology and Higher Education of the Republic of
Indonesia Number 29 of 2019 concerning Measurement and Determination of Innovation Readiness Level

Research Collaboration Plan

Description of considerations in Partners
The description of the considerations in this Research Partner was carried out by the Researcher Dr. Salmi
Mohd. Isa from Universiti Sains Malaysia who became one of the supporting factors in this collaboration due
to the close relationship and commitment as well as integrity and credibility possessed by both parties.
The Research Cooperation Implementation Plan
The collaboration will be carried out from January 2024 to December 2024 with the output target being an
international (reputable) journal for publication. This collaboration is the initial stage of a long-term
collaboration.
Matters and Responsibilities of UMB and Partners
Mercu Buana University will contribute internal research funds for research from Mercu Buana University
and Partners will contribute expertise in the research field.
Explanation of the next research plan at UMB after this research collaboration is complete
After this research is completed, Mercu Buana University and Partners can continue other collaborations in
preparing policy recommendations to stakeholders and collaboration to lead to outcome based education.
Roadmap. This research is done by working with data, organizing the data, sorting it out into
manageable units, synthesizing it, and deciding what to tell others. In accordance with the
descriptive research method, after the data has been collected, the next process is to simplify the
data obtained into a form that is easy to read, understand and interpret.

D. Results of Research Implementation

Write down briefly the results of the research implementation that have been achieved according to the year
of research implementation. Presentation includes data, analysis results, and output achievements (mandatory
and or additional). All reported results or achievements must be related to the stages of research
implementation as planned in the proposal. The presentation of data can be in the form of images, tables,
graphs, and the like, and analysis is supported by relevant and up-to-date primary library sources.
Research data was obtained from research conducted by one of the state universities in East Java. The
resulting innovations are related to halal food and beverages and halal cosmetics. Halal food and beverages
and halal cosmetics are clusters in Indonesia's Sharia Gross Domestic Product (GDP) (Terms of Reference
Islamic Digital Day 2023' National Committee for Sharia Economic and Finance 2023). Self-assessment of
Innovation Readiness Level (IRL) and Technology Readiness Level (TRL) was carried out by a network of
alumni innovation compartment teams from universities, BRIN, KNEKS who were also researchers in this
research. The results of the research carried out by the self-assessment consisted of 2 halal food and beverage
cluster products and 1 halal cosmetic medicine cluster product. It is hoped that the results of the assessment
carried out will provide insights and input on innovation development policies in the context of the sharia
ecosystem which will become the basis for designing strategies, programs and activities (Alika, V. A.;

12
Santoso, S.; Nurmaliki, S.; Anisa, N. (2021)).

Figure 6. FGD with researchers at Brawijaya University Malang

The following are the results of the IRL and TRL assessments
1. Product A of the Halal Food and Beverage Cluster
Product A is an innovative development product made from coffee leaf tea. An innovative step due to the high
number of Indonesian population experiencing diabetes, especially in a certain age range, namely 20 to 79
years old. This emphasizes the important role of this product innovation as an alternative tea option that not
only reduces coffee consumption, but also provides therapeutic benefits for diabetes sufferers.
a) Tedako (Teh Daun Kopi)
Tedako is a developmental product innovation made from coffee leaf tea. An innovative step by the high
number of Indonesians suffering from diabetes, especially in the age range of 20 to 79 who reach 19.465.100
people. This confirms the important role of Tedako as an alternative tea choice that not only reduces coffee
consumption, but also provides therapeutic benefits for diabetics (BastiawanH., SantosoS., SahabA. I.,
YaminA., & AlmiraB. (2022), Endri, Syafarudin, A., Santoso, S., Imaningsih, E. S., Suharti, T., & Rinda, R.
T. (2020).).
b) Spices gummy candy
Spices gummy candy is a jelly candy obtained from the extraction of instant spices as its main ingredient.
Known for its kenyal texture, distinctive sweetness, and spicy aftertaste caused by the addition of amnesia
powder spices that are rich in essential compounds.
c) Kombucha
Kombucha made from mushrooms or commonly known as tea fungi was a major concern in this study.
Kombucha is a product that contains the active ingredients of kombucha. This active ingredient is the result of
the fermentation of tea leaves using acetic acid and yeast bacteria. Kombucha has health benefits for the skin,
including its ability to increase skin moisture, relieve inflammation, improve skin elasticity, and reduce signs
of aging. highlighting innovative potential in combining the need for ethical and effective products in the field
of health and beauty.
The development of the Sharia economy is based on the exploitation of creative ideas that have a high selling
value (Dewi, R. K., & Santoso, S. (2023), Redata, L.; Kezia, R.; Solaiman, K. H.; Santoso, S. (2021), Sugeng
Santoso, Rahma Septi Anzelina, Luthfi Aulia Safari, Dimas Iskandar, Fery Erwanda (2021)., Santoso, S.,
Soehari, T. D., Aprianto, Y., Andrean, D., & Henny. (2020).). The innovation applied by the Sharia
economic actors can be considered as quality innovation and ready to market commercially (Agus Yulianto,
Sugeng Santoso, Drajat Jatnika (2022)), the steps to be taken is to measure and determine the level of
readiness of such innovation in accordance with the provisions contained in the Regulations of the Minister of
Research, Technology, and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia No. 29 Year 2019 on
Measurement and Establishment of the Innovation Readiness Level.
From IRL's calculations, self-assessment was carried out on the food and beverage clusters of Tedako and
Spices Gummy products as well as on the pharmaceutical and cosmetic cluster of Kombuca products. On the
three of these products IRL measurements were carried out, of these measures there are Katsinow 2 consisting
of IRL 4-6 and on IRL 3 is IRL 7-9. As for the measurement results IRLa self assessment in the table below:
a) Tedako
Self-assessment results related to innovation readiness level (IRL) 6 shown in the table below :

13
 Figure 7. Measurement Results of IRL-2 Tedako Products
The results of the measurement show the innovation readiness level (IRL) 2 has been achieved with a value of
80.00%.

Figure 8. Results of Percentage Calculation of Aspects IRL-2 Tedako Products

Of the seven aspects IRL has measured, there are still less than 80%. These include technology, markets,
investment and risk.

The results of the self-assessment related to the technology readiness level (TRL) 6 are shown in the table
below:The results of IRL's calculations are used to evaluate the technological readiness of the results of
technology design. TRL at the preparedness level of a research and application of technology is measured
systematically so that it can be used by users in both government, industry, and society.

Figure 9. Measurement Results of TRL-6 Tedako Products

IRL 6, prototype demonstration has reached its threshold. IRL 6 measurement results are 80.0% which means
IRL6 indicator is met.

IRL analysis: of the 7 aspects, there are 4 aspects that are not fulfilled, namely technology, market,
investment and risk.
Recommendations for improving the 4 aspects are as follows:
• Technology: carry out field tests in relevant environments with respondents so that the results can provide
validation that this product can be standardized.
• Market: expand market share to improve product branding and marketing, so that Tedako products can
become the choice of consumers on the market.
• Investment: communicate with investors and carry out business matching.
• Risk: reduce market risk by optimizing cooperation, attracting consumers and expanding market segments
across all age groups, including through developing product packaging designs

TRL Analysis: Recommendations for increasing TRL :

• Field tests as a representation of TRL 7 need to be carried out on field trials with respondents in the actual
environment, so that the results can provide validation that this product can be standardized and certified and

14
is suitable for meeting safety requirements for distribution and marketing (Agus Yulianto, Sugeng Santoso,
Drajat Jatnika (2022), Sugeng Santoso, Selma Alfarisah , Ari Ana Fatmawati , Rian Ubaidillah (2021). Susilo,
Y.; Wijayanti, E.; Santoso, S. (2021)).

b). Spices Gummy

Self-assessment results related to innovation readiness level (IRL) 6 shown in the table below :

Figure 10. Measurement Results of IRL-2 Spices Gummy Products

The results of the measurement show that the innovation readiness level 2 has been achieved at 80%.

Figure 11. Results of Percentage Calculation of Aspects IRL-2 Spices Gummy Products
Of the seven aspects IRL has measured, there are still less than 80%. These include technology, markets,
investment and risk.

Self-assessment results related to technology readiness level (TRL) 6 shown in the table below :

Figure 12. Measurement Results of TRL-6 Spices Gummy Products

IRL analysis: of the 7 aspects, there are 4 aspects that are not fulfilled, namely technology, market,
investment and risk.
Recommendations for improving the 4 aspects are as follows:
• Technology: conducting field tests in relevant environments with respondents so that the results can provide
validation that this product can be standardized.
• Market: expand market share to improve product branding and marketing, so that the product becomes the
choice of consumers on the market.
• Investment: communicate with investors and carry out business matching..
• Risk: reduce market risk by optimizing cooperation, attracting consumers and expanding market
segments across all age groups, including through developing product packaging designs (Ditra
Novtiansyah and Sugeng Santoso, 2023).

TRL Analysis: Recommendations for increasing TRL :

Field tests as a representation of TRL 7 need to be carried out on field trials with respondents in the actual
environment, so that the results can provide validation that this product can be standardized and certified and

15
is suitable for meeting safety requirements for distribution and marketing

b) Kombucha
Self-assessment results related to innovation readiness level (IRL) 6 shown in the table below :

Figure 13. Measurement Results of IRL-3 Kombucha Products

The results of the measurement show that the innovation readiness level 3 has been achieved at 80.95%. The
value has been reached and is ready to continue testing to increase the contribution of the product to the
Shariah economy (Rian Ubaidillah and Sugeng Santoso (2022)).

Figure 14. Results of Percentage Calculation of Aspects IRL-3 Kombucha Products

Based on the measurement of each aspect, there are aspects that are below 80%, namely markets and
investments.

Self-assessment results related to Technical Preparedness Level (IRL) 9 are shown in the table below :

Figure 15. Measurement Results of TRL-9 Kombucha Products

IRL 9, prototype demonstration has reached its threshold. IRL 9 measurement results are 90.0% which means
IRL9 indicator is met. It is achieved that the product can be expanded more widely into the market.

IRL analysis: of the 7 aspects, there are 2 aspects that are not fulfilled, namely the market and investment.
Recommendations for improving both aspects are as follows
 Market: analyze estimated market size, estimated market share and potential increases that can be
achieved.
 Investment: expanding investor networks to increase investment.

TRL Analysis: The recommendations are as follows:

• This product already has a product that is suitable for testing on users. The market segment is still lacking
because product sales are still limited to using social media platforms such as Instagram (Syiva Nur Malasari,

16
Sugeng Santoso, Yudha Pratana, Gerry Naldo (2022)), so buyers in this age group will feel confused about
how to buy the product. Sales are felt only from consumer to consumer. The product packaging is less
attractive for traveling because the packaging is quite large so it is difficult to carry when traveling.
Certification proves the successful operation of implementing technology that is suitable for distribution and
marketing with BPOM certification (Novita Tania, Sugeng Santoso, Adyanto Kurniawan Hulu, Gunawan
Wiyogo Siwantoro (2022),)

CONCLUSION
The application of IRL is still not widely used as a research requirement for lecturers at universities, even
though IRL is a downstream research result that brings users closer to their needs. Research was carried out
on innovations produced related to halal food and beverages and halal cosmetics. Halal food and beverages
and halal cosmetics are clusters in Indonesia's Sharia Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
• The results of the assessment of 2 halal food and beverage cluster products show IRL Level 2 and of the 7
aspects there are 4 aspects that do not meet the requirements, namely technology, market, investment and risk
Recommendation:
 Technology: field tests need to be carried out in an environment that is relevant to the respondent.
 Market: end customers identified and expanding market share
 Investment: communicate with investors and carry out business matching.
 Risk: reduce market risk by optimizing cooperation
E. Output Status
Write down the type, identity and status of achievement of each mandatory output and additional output (if
any) promised. The type of output can be publication, acquisition of intellectual property, test results or other
outputs that have been promised in the proposal. The description of the status of the output must be supported
by evidence of progress in achieving the output in accordance with the promised output.

The output status is in the form of research articles submitted to the IQTISHODUNA Journal: Journal of
Islamic Economics accredited by SINTA 2. (draft) scientific articles can be seen in attachment 3, Research
Output Progress Form in attachment 2,

F. The Role of Partner

Write down the realization of cooperation and contribution of Partners in-cash. Supporting evidence of the
realization of cooperation and the realization of partner contributions is reported in accordance with actual
conditions.

Partner Contribution: supporters in this collaboration because they are committed and have credibility in
developing the innovation ecosystem. Dr. Salmi Mohd. Isa from 4Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia carried
out this research in developing an innovation ecosystem with case studies of research lecturers at Universias
Brawijaya

G. Research Implementation Obstacles

Write down the difficulties or obstacles faced during conducting research and achieving the promised
outcomes, including an explanation if the implementation of research and research outputs are not as planned
or promised.

The research was carried out with partners and FGDs were held with Brawijaya University researchers who
are expected to become an example/model for developing an innovation ecosystem. The research is
(hopefully) to produce a model/scenario/recommendation proposal and the obstacle is that it is trying to find
solutions to recommendations through networks, for example marketing networks, capital (access) networks,
user networks.

H. Bibliography
The bibliography is organized and written according to the number system (Vancouver style) according to the
order in which it is cited. Only libraries that are cited in community service proposals are included in the
Bibliography.
Ade, Agung Fachrully; Santoso, Sugeng; Nando Dwi Yulio (2021). Analysis of The Level Of Innovation And
Technology Readiness In The Pond Waterwheel Technology Development Project To Support

17
 Increased National Shrimp Production (Case Study Of Pt. Barata Indonesia Persero), Prosiding
Seminar Nasional Sains dan Teknologi IV, ISBN 2477-4845 artikel 9, pp. 73 - 81, 2021.
Agus Yulianto, Sugeng Santoso, Drajat Jatnika (2022), The Effect of Product Diversification, Taste, and
Service Quality on Customer Satisfaction, 19th International Symposium on Management (INSYMA
2022), 1103-1111, Atlantis Press. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/insyma-22/125977219
Ahmad, Khadijah et al. "Inovasi dalam Pengembangan Bisnis Berbasis Syariah" (2021).
Alika, V. A.; Santoso, S.; Nurmaliki, S.; Anisa, N. (2021). Marketing Strategy Sharia Financial Institutions to
Promote Sharia Fintech and Micro and Small Enterprises (MSES). Proceedings of the 1st MICOSS
Mercu Buana International Conference on Social Sciences, MICOSS 2020, EAI. doi:10.4108/eai.28-9-
2020.2307373
Andrea, G., Santoso, S. (2020). Improving Economy of the Community Based on Sustainable Tourism and
Creative Economy through Business Process Re-Engineering (BPR) With Geopark Development in
Lebak Regency Banten Province. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research
Technology. Volume 5, Issue 1, January – 2020. ISSN No:-2456-2165
BastiawanH., SantosoS., SahabA. I., YaminA., & AlmiraB. (2022). Analysis of Healthy Living Behavior,
Age, and Income on Gluten-Free Food Consumption: Analysis of Healthy Living Behavior, Age, and
Income on Gluten-Free Food Consumption. Journal of Consumer Sciences, 7(1), 51-67.
https://doi.org/10.29244/jcs.7.1.51-67
Dewi, R. K., & Santoso, S. (2023). A comprehensive analysis of the creative economy’s value addition in
Lebak Regency, Indonesia. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-
4478), 12(6), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i6.2833
Ditra Novtiansyah and Sugeng Santoso, 2023. Analysis of the Relationship between Risk Management in
Sharia-based Crowdfunding and Trust in the Community: Case Study of Al Fazza Nature School,
Cimanggis, Depok City. United International Journal for Research & Technology (UIJRT), 4(11), pp80-
91
Dumilah, D. Komarudin, M. Ubaidillah, R. Siagian, S. Susanto, S. (2021). Peran Ekonomi Kreatif Dalam
Meningkatkan Industri Pariwisata Di Seaworld Ancol. JUMPA Volume 7, Nomor 2, Januari 2021
Endri, Syafarudin, A., Santoso, S., Imaningsih, E. S., Suharti, T., & Rinda, R. T. (2020). Consumption
Behavior Patterns Of Generations Y Halal Products In Indonesia. Academy of Entrepreneurship
Journal, 26( 2), 1-10
Lovika, A., Burhanuddin, B., Santoso, S., & Praktikno, I. (2022). Peran Literasi Keuangan Syariah Pada
Pelaku Usaha Makanan Minuman Halal Terhadap Peningkatan Nilai Tambah. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan
Kewirausahaan, 10(2), 655-667. https://doi.org/10.47668/pkwu.v10i2.474
Novita Tania, Sugeng Santoso, Adyanto Kurniawan Hulu, Gunawan Wiyogo Siwantoro (2022), Potential
Role Analysis of Halal Certification Facilitation and Tangerang Emas Program Activation to Increase
Culinary Micro Business Income in Tangerang City, 19th International Symposium on Management
(INSYMA 2022), 1127-1134, Atlantis Press. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/insyma-
22/125977219
Putra, I.M.Y.;Santoso,S.(2020). Rekomendasi Mesin Pengupas Kulit Testa Kelapa Berdasarkan Tingkat
Kesiapterapan Teknologi, Jurnal AGROHITA: Jurnal Agroteknologi, 5(2), 143-154.
DOI : 10.31604/jap.v5i2.2143
Redata, L.; Kezia, R.; Solaiman, K. H.; Santoso, S. (2021). Analisis Korelasi Pendampingan Komunitas
Terhadap Inovasi Pelaku Ekonomi Kreatif Dan Pemenuhan Kebutuhan Konsumen: Studi Kasus Pada
Komunitas Tangerang Berdaya Dan Pelaku Ekonomi Kreatif Kuliner Tangerang. Business
Management Journal, 17(1), 1-19. doi:10.30813/bmj
Rian Ubaidillah and Sugeng Santoso (2022), Analysis of Increasing Added Value Ecosystem Creative
Economy Startup in The Culinary Sector (Case Study of the First Winner of Food Startup Indonesia
2020), Volume 03, Issue 09, 2022 pp. 59-65.

Salmi Mohd Isa, Ivy Mak Choong Wei and Sugeng Santoso (2021). Adoption of E-wallet among Penang
Residents during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Moderating Roles of Rewards,. The 41th National and
International Conference "Global Goals, Local Actions: Looking Back and Moving Forward 2021” Vol.
1 (14), 1-24
Santoso S, Widyanty W, Nurhidajat R, Ramadhani Marfatah M, Mahmud G, Fahlevi M, Aljuaid M, Zhghenti
T and Shahid D (2022), System dynamics modeling for developing an agrotourism-creative economy
in the framework of the village innovation system. Front. Environ. Sci. 10:962235. doi:
10.3389/fenvs.2022.962235
Santoso, S., Donna, L.S.B., Kayani, I., Cahyanugraha, I.H., Arfiandi, D., 63 Aryati., D.. (2023). Analysis of
innovation readiness level in SME exporting crafts sub-sector on furniture in Yogyakarta. Manajemen
dan Bisnis, 22(1), 63-79. DOI: 10.24123/jmb.v22i1.585.

18
Santoso, S., Hapsari, P. A., Difoasih, G., & Prianto, S. E. (2021). Analysis of Public Interest In Online
Tourism In The Middle of The Covid-19 Pandemic. JELAJAH: Journal of Tourism and Hospitality,
3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.33830/jelajah.v3i1.1745
Santoso, S., Siswanti, I., Hidayat, R. N., Isa, S. M., & Marfatah, M. R. (2022). Measuring Model of
Infrastructure Provision Readiness with Sharia PPP Financing Scheme Using the IRL and TRL Concept
Approach. IQTISHODUNA: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 11(2), 139–152.
https://doi.org/10.54471/iqtishoduna.v11i2.1656Kuliner Minuman Boba, JEMSI: Jurnal Ekonomi
Manajemen Sistem Informasi, 2(4), 457-468. https://doi.org/10.31933/jemsi.v2i4
Santoso, S., Soehari, T. D., Aprianto, Y., Andrean, D., & Henny. (2020). Value Creation In Fisheries Supply
Chain As A Role Model For Fish Protein Hydrolyzate Cluster Development. Jurnal Rekayasa Mesin,
11(3), 401 – 407. doi:10.21776/ub.jrm.2020.011.03.12.
Santoso, S.; Natanael, A.; Fatmawati, A.A.; Griselda, A.; Khoirunnisa, J.; Simanjuntak, M.; Bagus, A. A. R.
(2021a). Analisis Pengembangan Platform Ekspor Sub Sektor Kuliner Tinjauan Dari Model Sistem
Inovasi, Jurnal Distribusi, 9(1), 29-38
Santoso, S.; Natanael, A.; Griselda, A.; Khoirunnisa, J.; Simanjuntak, M.; Bagus, A. R.; Merry, L. Z. (2021b).
Analysis of Business Process Reengineering and Export Platform in Supporting Business Exports of
Creative Economy Players in the Micro, Small and Medium Business in Culinary Sub-sector. Journal
of Economics, Business, and Government Challenges (JoEBGC), 4(1), 32-49.
doi:10.33005/ebgc.v4i1.170
Santoso, S.; Nusraningrum, D.; Hadibrata, B.; Widyanty, W.; Isa, S. M.; Apriyanto, Y.; Henny. (2021). Policy
Recommendation for Food Security in Indonesia: Fish and Sea Cucumber Protein Hydrolysates
Innovation Based. European Journal of Business and Management, 13(7), 71-79.
doi:10.7176/EJBM/13-7-08
Santoso, S.; Ubaidillah, R.; Balqis, B.; Sembiring, C. F. (2021). Community Role in Improving Muslim-
Friendly Value Chain in COVID-19 Pandemic at Geopark Bayah Dome Tourism Area. Proceedings of
the 1st MICOSS Mercu Buana International Conference on Social Sciences, MICOSS 2020, EAI.
doi:10.4108/eai.28-9-2020.2307372.
Santoso, Sugeng, Fatmawati, Ari, Ubaidillah, Rian, Widyanty, Winda, AND Isa, Salmi. " Analysis of Muslim
Friendly Tourism Development in Indonesia" IQTISHODUNA: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam [Online],
Volume 10 Number 2 (1 October 2021), 17-32.
Sugeng Santoso, Daru Asih dkk (2021). Telaah Kebijakan dan Strategi Pengembangan Ekosistem Makanan
Dan Minuman Halal. Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Kemaritiman dan Investasi, ISBN 978-623-
92020-7-1
Sugeng Santoso, R. Nurhidajat, Yayuk Arsih, Adhadi Praja, Sandi Perdian (2022), Application of Self-Service
Technology for Advancing Customer Satisfaction in Food and Beverage Retail Business, Jurnal
Administrasi Profesional, Vol. 3 No. 2, 11 – 24
Sugeng Santoso, Rahma Septi Anzelina, Luthfi Aulia Safari, Dimas Iskandar, Fery Erwanda (2021).
Pembiayaan Dan Manfaat Financial Technology (Fintech) Syariah Pada 212 Mart, Syi’ar Iqtishadi:
Journal of Islamic Economics, Finance and Banking, 5(1), 68-92. DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.35448/jiec.v5i1.9889.
Sugeng Santoso, Selma Alfarisah , Ari Ana Fatmawati , Rian Ubaidillah (2021). Correlation Analysis of the
Halal Certification Process and Perceptions of the. Cost of Halal Certification with the Intentions of
Food and Beverage SMEs Actors, Jurnal Religious, 5 (2), 297-308. DOI :10.15575/rjsalb.v5i2.11627
Sugeng Santoso, Syafaat Pradipta, Trubus Sumantono, Ari Ana Fatmawati (2021). Pengembangan Desa
Wisata Berkonsep Kapasitas Inovasi Daerah Di Desa Tanjungjaya, Kabupaten Pandeglang, Provinsi
Banten, Jurnal Kepariwisataan Indonesia: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kepariwisataan
Indonesia Vol. 15, No. 2 (2021), 71-85
Susilo, Y.; Wijayanti, E.; Santoso, S. (2021). Penerapan Transformasi Digital Pada Pemasaran Ekonomi
Kreatif
Syiva Nur Malasari, Sugeng Santoso, Yudha Pratana, Gerry Naldo (2022), Analysis of Google Meet
Readiness as Online Communication Media in the Era of Digital Transformation, 19th International
Symposium on Management (INSYMA 2022), 1117-1126, Atlantis Press. https://www.atlantis-
press.com/proceedings/insyma-22/125977219
Temas (2023). Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Pesantren Berbasis Kewirausahaan (Studi Kasus di Pesantren Al-
Ittifaq Desa Alamendah Kecamatan Rancabali Kabupaten Bandung Jawa Barat), Tesis, Universitas
Islam Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta.
Wijiharjono, N. (2021). Manajemen Strategik: Pemikiran Michael Porter dan Implikasinya bagi
Pengembangan Ekonomi Kreatif.

19
 ATTACHMENT

 Attachment 1 Report Interim Revision Sheet

20
 Attachment 2 Research Output Progress Form

21
 Attachment 3 Draft Article

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
 Attachment 4 Proof of Submit/review/accept

36
 Attachment 5. Implementation Arrangement (IA)

37
38
39
40
41
42