Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Relation_of_systemic_sympathetic_nervous
Relation_of_systemic_sympathetic_nervous
Relation_of_systemic_sympathetic_nervous
We have previously demonstrated that the systemic dimensions, and EF or fractional shortening measures.
sympathetic nervous system (SNS) is activated in pro- The NE2 values correlated with LV end-systolic dimen-
portion to an increase in cineventriculographic left ven- sions (r 5 0.53, p 5 0.03) and inversely with LVEF (r 5
tricular (LV) end-systolic volume and decrease in ejection 20.45, p 5 0.07) and fractional shortening (r 5 0.43,
fraction (EF) in patients with chronic mitral regurgitation p 5 0.08) measures, but not with LV end-diastolic di-
(MR). However, the relation between noninvasive echo- mensions. The metabolic clearance rate values showed
cardiographic measures of LV size and performance and an inverse correlation with LV end-diastolic (r 5 20.52,
systemic SNS activation and their clinical implications in p 5 0.03) and end-systolic (r 5 20.49, p 5 0.04)
patients with MR is not known. We studied 17 MR dimensions, but not with LV performance measures. The
patients with echocardiography, arterial norepinephrine increase in NE2 values was progressive as the LV end-
(NE) sampling, and [3H]-NE infusions and arterial blood systolic dimensions increased and more marked at LV
sampling to determine NE kinetic parameters using a end-systolic dimensions >40 mm. Thus, activation of the
2-compartment analysis, including extravascular NE re- SNS is related to an increase in echocardiographic LV
lease rates (NE2, index of SNS activity) and the meta- end-systolic dimensions and a decrease in LV perfor-
bolic clearance rate from the vascular compartment. The mance measures in chronic MR. Q2000 by Excerpta
arterial NE values correlated with LV end-systolic dimen- Medica, Inc.
sions (r 5 0.50, p 5 0.04), but not with LV end-diastolic (Am J Cardiol 2000;86:1193–1197)
©2000 by Excerpta Medica, Inc. All rights reserved. 0002-9149/00/$–see front matter 1193
The American Journal of Cardiology Vol. 86 December 1, 2000 PII S0002-9149(00)01201-7
I, 7 were in functional class II, and the remaining 3
TABLE 1 Relation of Arterial NE to Echocardiographic
patients were in functional class III. At the time of Parameters
cardiac catheterization, medical treatment included:
an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in 7 pa- Echocardiographic
Parameters Correlation (r) p Value
tients, a diuretic in 2 patients, a b-adrenergic blocking
agent in 3 patients, and a nitrate or digoxin in 1 patient Arterial NE (pg/ml)
each. The b-adrenergic blocking agents, diuretics, LVEDD (mm) 0.33 0.18
LVESD (mm) 0.50 0.04
digoxin, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibi- LVFS (%) 20.28 0.27
tors, were all discontinued at least 24 to 48 hours, LVEF (%) 20.23 0.38
whereas the nitrate was discontinued at least 12 hours
EDD 5 end-diastolic diameter; ESD 5 end-systolic diameter; FS 5 fractional
before the investigative study. All patients provided shortening.
written informed consent on forms previously ap-
proved by the institutional review boards at the Uni-
versity of Michigan or Veterans Affairs Medical Cen-
ters, Ann Arbor, Michigan. TABLE 2 Relation of NE Kinetic Parameters to
Study design: A 2-dimensionally targeted echocar- Echocardiographic Parameters
diogram was recorded to measure LV chamber dimen- Echocardiographic
sions and calculate LV ejection fraction (EF) and Parameters Correlation (r) p Value
fractional shortening. SNS activity was then assessed 2
NE2 (mg/min/m )
using a 3H-norepinephrine ([3H]-NE) infusion with LVEDD (mm) 0.25 0.34
multiple arterial blood samples to provide data for a LVESD (mm) 0.53 0.03
2-compartment modeling analysis of NE kinetics.10 LVFS (%) 20.46 0.07
Echocardiography: Echocardiography was per- LVEF (%) 20.45 0.07
formed in multiple orthogonal 2-dimensional imaging MCR1 (liters/min/m2)
planes, and M-mode and Doppler (conventional and LVEDD (mm) 20.52 0.03
LVESD (mm) 20.49 0.05
color Doppler) examinations were performed after LVFS (%) 0.07 0.80
first having a reference from the 2-dimensional im- LVEF (%) 0.05 0.83
ages. LV wall thickness (interventricular septum and NESF (mg/min/m2)
posterior wall) and end-diastolic and end-systolic di- LVEDD (mm) 20.18 0.50
mensions were measured on-line using standard crite- LVESD (mm) 20.46 0.07
ria established by the American Society of Echocar- LVFS (%) 0.38 0.13
diography.11 Fractional shortening of the left ventricle LVEF (%) 0.46 0.07
(%) was calculated as the difference in LV end-dia- R21 (mg/min/m2)
stolic and end-systolic diameter 4 by end-diastolic LVEDD (mm) 0.09 0.72
LVESD (mm) 0.23 0.36
diameter 3 100. EF was calculated on-line by a pack- LVFS (%) 20.23 0.36
age available on all standard echocardiographic equip- LVEF (%) 20.20 0.45
ment that uses LV volumes. This involved tracing of
MCR1 5 metabolic clearance rate; NESF 5 NE spillover fraction from
LV endocardial borders at end-diastole and end-sys- compartment 2 to 1; R21 5 the rates of NE appearance into compartment 1;
tole in the apical 4- and 2-chamber views to calculate other abbreviations as in Table 1.
LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, respec-
tively. Then, EFs were calculated as the difference
between LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volume 4
by end-diastolic volume 3 100. LV mass index was obtained from the 10- and 20-minute decay time
calculated using the Schiller method.12 All measure- points. Chilled plastic tubes containing ethylenedia-
ments were averaged over 5 cardiac cycles. minetetraacetic acid and glutathione were used to col-
Sympathetic nervous system activity: The protocol lect the arterial blood samples, which were then stored
adapted for this analysis was based on our previously on ice. Plasma was obtained by centrifuging the blood
published procedures.10,13–19 The protocol consisted samples at 4°C. These samples were then stored at
of an intravenous infusion of [3H]-NE, approximate –70°C until the assays were performed. Arterial NE
specific activity 18.8 Ci/mmol (New England Nuclear; was determined by a single isotope derivative radioen-
Boston, Massachusetts), calculated to deliver 0.35 zymatic assay.19 Each subject’s samples were mea-
mCi/min/m2 at a rate of 0.2 ml/min using an infusion sured in the same assay. The intra-assay coefficient of
pump. Ascorbic acid (1 mg/ml) was added to the variation for this measurement in our laboratory is 5%
infusion to prevent the oxidation of NE. The infusion for NE. Then, [3H]-NE concentrations were deter-
was given for 1 hour to achieve a steady-state level of mined following alumina extraction of plasma (recov-
[3H]-NE. Arterial blood samples were taken from the ery approximately 60%) within 24 hours of the study.
LV catheter at 40, 50, and 60 minutes during the Liquid scintillation counting of the radiolabeled cate-
infusion to determine arterial NE and [3H]-NE con- cholamine was subsequently performed to determine
centrations. The infusion was stopped at 1 hour, and [3H]-NE concentration.
additional arterial blood samples were collected at 1, The systemic NE kinetic parameters were derived
2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 14, 16, 18, and 20 minutes to measure using a 2-compartment model developed by Linares
[3H]-NE concentrations. Arterial NE levels were also and colleagues.10 This involved determining simulta-
RESULTS
[3H]-NE kinetic data: The mean arterial NE
value in these patients with MR was 278 6
75 pg/ml. The NE kinetic parameters in these
patients were as follows: the average NE2
was 2.04 6 0.61 mg/min/m2; NE spillover
fraction was 13% 6 2%; the metabolic clear-
ance rate from compartment 1 was 0.95 6 11
L/min/m2; the rate of appearance of NE into
FIGURE 1. Relation between arterial NE and echocardiographically mea-
compartment 1 was 0.29 6 0.09 mg/min/m2;
sured LV end-systolic diameter (ESD). and the volume of distribution of NE in
compartment 1 was 2.77 6 1.44 L/m2. There
was a relation between the arterial NE and
neous fits of the tracee (arterial NE) and tracer ([3H]- NE2 values (r 5 0.78, p ,0.001), but not between the
NE) systems by the method of weighted nonlinear values for NE and the metabolic clearance rates from
least squares.20,21 In this 2-compartment model, com- compartment 1 (r 5 20.14, p 5 0 .56) in these
partment 1 represents the vascular compartment, and patients.
is therefore accessible to sampling. On the other hand, Echocardiographic data: The echocardiographic
compartment 2 represents the extravascular compart- mean LV dimensions were as follows: LV end-dia-
ment into which NE is released from nerve terminals stolic diameter, 57 6 9 mm; LV end-systolic diame-
and exchanges with the vascular compartment, and is ter, 39 6 5 mm; LV fractional shortening, 32% 6 5%;
therefore not accessible for sampling. The NE kinetic LVEF, 58% 6 8%. All of these patients with MR had
parameters estimated by this model included: the rates an EF of $50%. LV mass index was increased in
of NE appearance into compartment 1 (mg/min/m2) these patients to an average of 157 6 57 g/m2.
and into compartment 2 (NE2, mg/min/m2); the met- Relation between echocardiographic data and arte-
abolic clearance rate from compartment 1 (L/min/m2); rial NE and NE kinetic parameters (Tables 1 and 2): The
the NE spillover fraction from compartment 2 to 1 arterial NE levels showed a positive relation to LV
(%); and the volume of distribution of NE in compart- end-systolic diameters (r 5 0.50, p 5 0.04, Figure 1),
ment 1 (L/m2).10 The values for NE2 were used as our but not to LV end-diastolic diameters (r 5 0. 34, p 5
FIGURE 2. Relation between the extravascular NE release rates (NE2) and various echocardiographic parameters is shown. Note the
direct relation between NE2 and end-systolic diameter (ESD, left panel), suggesting that as ESD increases, there is a progressive in-
crease in NE2, our index of SNS activity. Note also the weak but inverse relation between NE2 and LV fractional shortening (FS) (mid-
dle panel) and EF (right panel), suggesting that as FS and EF decreases, there is a progressive increase in NE2, our marker of SNS
activity.