Argument Mapping Worksheet

Disclaimer

The content and information contained in this document are the intellectual property of
Apex Hatchers, created for educational and training purposes only. This worksheet is
provided as-is, without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including but not limited
to the warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and
non-infringement. In no event shall the author be liable for any claim, damages, or other
liability, whether in an action of contract, tort, or otherwise, arising from, out of, or in
connection with the worksheet or the use or other dealings in the worksheet.

The recipient agrees not to reproduce, duplicate, modify, sell, resell, or exploit any
portion of the worksheet for any commercial purpose. This worksheet is intended solely
for the personal, noncommercial use of the individual recipient. Unauthorized
reproduction or distribution of this document, or any portion of it, may result in severe
civil and criminal penalties and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under
law.

Apex Hatchers reserves the right to revoke the access privilege and/or take legal action
against any misuse, copyright infringement, or violation of this disclaimer.
Argument Mapping Worksheet

Argument mapping visually represents the logical structure of arguments using diagrams
to depict key components and relationships. This allows analysis of reasoning and critical
evaluation of validity based on how well evidence supports stated conclusions.

How to Map Arguments

To map an argument:

1. State the Central Claim - The main conclusion the argument attempts to validate
2. Identify Premises - The statements put forth as evidence to support the central
claim
3. Examine Inferences - The reasoning linking premises to claim (inductive,
deductive etc)
4. Recognize Counter-Arguments - Arguments acknowledging opposing positions
5. Assess Overall Structure - How components logically flow to defend central
claim

Key elements to Map

1. Central Claim - The core assertion or viewpoint being argued

2. Premises - Fact statements and reasoning used as evidence for claim
3. Inferences - Logical relationship between premises and conclusion
4. Assumptions - Embedded beliefs implied but not made explicit
5. Counter-Arguments - Arguments acknowledging opposing view
6. Key Terms - Definitions of words integral to position taken
Templates: Choose visualization format fitting complexity

1. Chain Argument Map - Linear progression of statements

2. Hierarchy Map - Relationships shown spatially high to low
3. Refutation Map - Explicitly diagrams counter-positions

Instructions

1. Clearly label all key argument components

2. Use linking arrows to depict logical flows and relationships
3. Assess strengths/weaknesses of reasoning chains

Benefits of Argument Mapping

1. Clarifies communication by structuring critical elements

2. Surfaces assumptions, constraints and perspectives
3. Demonstrates evidentiary basis for assertions
4. Enables analysis on argument reasoning quality

Conclusion
The focus is on how argument mapping can elevate reasoning, analysis and decision
making by promoting clarity, surfacing assumptions, enabling structured evaluation and
mutual understanding through respectful analysis.

------------------------------------------- End of Document -------------------------------------------