Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Heat Transfer Module
Heat Transfer Module
February, 2022
DIRE DAWA, ETHIOPI
Chapter 1: Introduction to Heat Transfer
Copper 401
Silver 429
Gold 317
Aluminum 237
Steel 60.5
Limestone 2.15
Bakelite 1.4
Water 0.613
Air 0.0263
It is important that the student gain a basic perspective of the magnitude of thermal conductivity
for various materials. The background for this comes from the introductory Chemistry courses.
Molecules of various materials gain energy through various mechanisms. Gases exhibit energy
through the kinetic energy of the molecule. Energy is gained or lost through collusions of gaseous
molecules as they travel through the medium. Solids, being are much more stationary, cannot
effectively transfer energy through these same mechanisms. Instead, solids may exhibit energy
through vibration or rotation of the nucleus.
QUESTIONS
1) For a given heat flow and for the same thickness, the temperature drop across the material will
be maximum for:
(a) Copper (b) Steel (c) Glass-wool (d) Refractory brick
2) Steady two-dimensional heat conduction takes place in the body shown in the figure below.
The normal temperature gradients over surfaces P and Q can be considered to be uniform. The
𝜕𝑇
temperature gradient at surface Q is equal to 10 k/m. Surfaces P and Q are maintained at
𝜕𝑥
constant temperatures as shown in the figure, while the remaining part of the boundary is insulated.
The body has a constant thermal conductivity of 0.1 W/m.K.
𝜕𝑇 𝜕𝑇
The values of 𝜕𝑥 and 𝜕𝑦 at surface P are:
𝜕𝑇 𝜕𝑇
(a) = 20 K/m, 𝜕𝑦 = 0 K/m
𝜕𝑥
𝜕𝑇 𝜕𝑇
(b) 𝜕𝑥 = 0 K/m, 𝜕𝑦 = 10 K/ m
𝜕𝑇 𝜕𝑇
(b) = 10 K/m, 𝜕𝑦 = 10 K /m
𝜕𝑥
𝜕𝑇 𝜕𝑇
(c) = 0 K/m, 𝜕𝑦 = 20 K m
𝜕𝑥
3) A steel ball of mass 1kg and specific heat 0.4 kJ/kg is at a temperature of 60°C. It is dropped
into 1kg water at 20°C. The final steady state temperature of water is:
(a) 23.5°C (b) 300°C (c) 35°C (d) 40°C
presumes
1. Steady-state conditions ,2. Constant value of thermal conductivity.,3. Uniform temperatures at
the wall surfaces ,4. One-dimensional heat flow. Of these statements:
(a) 1, 2 and 3 are correct (b) 1, 2 and 4 are correct (c) 2, 3 and 4 are correct (d) 1, 3 and 4 are
correct
7) A plane wall is 25 cm thick with an area of 1 m2, and has a thermal conductivity of 0.5 W/mK.
If a temperature difference of 60°C is imposed across it, what is the heat flow?
(a) 120W (b) 140W (c) 160W (d) 180W
Where T is temperature and x is distance from one face towards other face of wall. If the slab
material has thermal diffusivity of 2×10-3 m2/hr, what is the rate of change of temperature at the
other face of the wall?
(a) 0.1°C/h (b) 0.2°C/h (c) 0.3°C/h (d) 0.4°C/h
9) Thermal diffusivity of a substance is:
(a) Inversely proportional to thermal conductivity (b) Directly proportional to thermal conductivity
(c) Directly proportional to the square of thermal conductivity (d) Inversely proportional to the
square of thermal conductivity
10) Which one of the following expresses the thermal diffusivity of a substance in terms of thermal
conductivity (k), mass density (ρ) and specific heat (c)?
(a) 𝑘 2 𝜌𝑐 (b) 1/𝑘𝜌𝑐 (c) 𝑘/𝜌𝑐 (d) 𝜌𝑐/𝑘 2
11) A furnace is made of a red brick wall of thickness 0.5 m and conductivity 0.7 W/mK. For the
same heat loss and temperature drop, this can be replaced by a layer of diatomite earth of
conductivity 0.14 W/mK and thickness
(a) 0.05 m (b) 0.1 m (c) 0.2 m (d) 0.5 m
12) In which one of the following materials, is the heat energy propagation minimum due to
conduction heat transfer?
(a) Lead (b) Copper (c) Water (d) Air
Chapter 2: General Conduction Equation
⋯
1 𝜕𝑇 𝑞
⋅ = 𝛻2𝑇 +
𝑎 𝜕𝜏 𝑘
The vector form of this equation is quite compact and is the most general form. However, we
often find it convenient to expand the del-squared term in specific coordinate systems:
Cartesian Coordinates
⋯
1 𝜕𝑇 𝜕 2 𝑇 𝜕 2 𝑇 𝜕 2 𝑇 𝑞
⋅ = + + +
𝑎 𝜕𝜏 𝜕𝑥 2 𝜕𝑦 2 𝜕𝑧 2 𝑘
Circular Coordinates
⋯
1 𝜕𝑇 1 𝜕 𝜕𝑇 1 𝜕 2𝑇 𝜕 2𝑇 𝑞
⋅ = (𝑟 ⋅ ) + 2 ⋅ 2 + 2 +
𝑎 𝜕𝜏 𝑟 𝜕𝑟 𝜕𝑟 𝑟 𝜕𝜃 𝜕𝑧 𝑘
Spherical Coordinates
⋯
1 𝜕𝑇 1 𝜕 𝜕𝑇 1 𝜕 2𝑇 1 𝜕 𝜕𝑇 𝑞
⋅ = 2 (𝑟 2 ⋅ ) + 2 ⋅ + ⋅ (𝑠𝑖𝑛 𝜃 ⋅ ) +
𝑎 𝜕𝜏 𝑟 𝜕𝑟 𝜕𝑟 𝑟 ⋅ 𝑠𝑖𝑛2 𝜃 𝜕𝜑 2 𝑟 2 𝑠𝑖𝑛 𝜃 𝜕𝜃 𝜕𝑧 𝑘
Bottom surface(0 < 𝑥 < 𝐿, 𝑦 = 0): The surface is subject to convection. Heat conducted to the
edge cannot be stored and must be convected away:
𝑑𝑇
−𝑘 ⋅ 𝐴𝑦 ⋅ | = ℎ ⋅ 𝐴𝑦 ⋅ (𝑇∞ − 𝑇𝑥,0 )
𝑑𝑦 𝑥,0
QUESTIONS
1) A concrete wall has a surface area of 30 m2 and is 0.30 m thick. It separates warm room
air from cold ambient air. The inner surface of the wall is known to be at a temperature of
25 °C, while the outer surface is at –15 °C. The thermal conductivity of the concrete is 1.0
W/m∙K.
1. Describe the conditions that must be satisfied in order for the temperature distribution in
the wall to be linear. 2. What is the driving force for the transfer of heat? 3. What is the
heat loss through the wall?
1. steady-state heat transfer, and homogenous isotropic medium 2. ∆𝑻 = 𝟒𝟎°𝐂 3. 𝑸 =
𝟒 𝒌𝑾
2) A new 1-ft thick insulating material was recently tested for heat resistant properties. The
data recorded temperatures of 70 °F and 210 °F on the cold and hot sides, respectively. If
the thermal conductivity of the insulating material is 0.026 Btu/ft∙hr∙°F, calculate the rate
of the heat flux, 𝑄̇ or 𝑄/𝐴 , through the wall in Btu/ft2 ∙hr. Resolve the problem in SI units.
𝑸 = 𝟑. 𝟔𝟒 𝐁𝐭𝐮/ 𝒇𝒕𝟐 𝐡𝐫, and 𝑸̇ = 𝟗𝟖𝟔𝟑 𝐜𝐚𝐥 /𝐦𝟐 𝐡𝐫 = 𝟗. 𝟖𝟔𝟑 𝐤𝐜𝐚𝐥/ 𝐦𝟐 𝐡𝐫
3) The wall of an oven consists of three layers of brick. The inside is built from 8 in. of
firebrick, k = 0.68 Btu/(hr∙ft2 ∙°F/ft), surrounded by 4 in. of insulating brick, k = 0.15
Btu/(hr∙ft2 ∙°F/ft), and an outside layer of 6 in. of building brick, k = 0.40 Btu/(hr∙ft2 ∙°F/ft).
The oven operates at 1600 °F. It is anticipated that the outer side of the wall can be
maintained at 125 °F by the circulation of air. How much heat will be lost per square foot
of surface area and what are the temperatures at the interfaces of the layers?
𝑸 = 𝟑𝟑𝟐 𝐁𝐭𝐮/ 𝐡𝐫, and 𝑻𝟏 = 1275°F, 𝑻𝟐 = 537°F.
4) A 3-in. outside diameter steel pipe is covered with a 0.5-in. layer of asbestos (a), which in
turn is covered with a 2-in. layer of glass wool (b). Determine the steady-state heat transfer
per foot of pipe, L, if the pipe outer surface temperature is 500 °F and the glass wool outer
temperature is 100 °F and calculate the outer asbestos temperature, 𝑇𝑖 (i.e., the interfacial
temperature between the asbestos and glass wool). Assume an asbestos-glass wool
interfacial temperature of 300 °F, an average asbestos (a) temperature of 200 °F, and glass
wool (b) temperature of 400 °F. Based on a literature review, asbestos and glass wool
thermal conductivity values have been estimated to be: 𝑘𝑎 = 0.120 Btu /hr ft °F (200°F)
and 𝑘𝑏 = 0.0317 Btu /hr ft °F (400°F).
𝑸̇ = 𝟏𝟎𝟑. 𝟓 𝐁𝐭𝐮/ 𝐡𝐫 𝐟𝐭, and 𝑻𝒊 =139.5°F
Chapter 3: One dimensional, Steady State Conduction
In a Cartesian System the 1-D, SS problem without heat sources (generation) and for constant
thermal conductivity may be written by simplifying the General Heat Conduction Equation:
⋯
1 𝜕𝑇 𝜕2 𝑇 𝜕2 𝑇 𝜕2 𝑇 𝑞
⋅ = 2 + 2 + 2 +
𝑎 𝜕𝜏 𝜕𝑥 𝜕𝑦 𝜕𝑧 𝑘
𝜕2𝑇
=0
𝜕𝑥 2
for cylindrical coordinate system
1𝑑 𝑑𝑇
(𝑘𝑟 ) = 0
𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑟
In a Cartesian System the 1-D, SS problem with heat sources (generation) and for constant thermal
conductivity the General Heat Conduction Equation:
⋯
1 𝜕𝑇 𝜕 2 𝑇 𝜕 2 𝑇 𝜕 2 𝑇 𝑞
⋅ = + + +
𝑎 𝜕𝜏 𝜕𝑥 2 𝜕𝑦 2 𝜕𝑧 2 𝑘
SS 1-D 1-D
Or,
⋯
𝜕2𝑇 𝑞
+𝑘 =0
𝜕𝑥 2
𝑑𝑇 𝐶
= = 𝐶1
𝑑𝑥 𝑘
𝑇(𝑥) = 𝐶1 𝑥 + 𝐶2
Similarly for cylindrical coordinate system Integration of without heat sources (generation)
equation gives us
𝑇(𝑟) = 𝐶1 𝑙𝑛( 𝑟) + 𝐶2
. 𝑑𝑇 𝑇2 − 𝑇1 𝑇1 − 𝑇2 𝑇1 − 𝑇2 𝑇1 − 𝑇2
𝑄 = −𝑘𝐴 = −𝑘𝐴 = 𝑘𝐴 = =
𝑑𝑥 𝐿 𝐿 𝐿 𝑅
𝑘𝐴
. 𝑇1 − 𝑇2 𝐿
⇒𝑄= ,𝑅 =
𝑅 𝑘𝐴
Where R is called thermal resistance.
Defining resistance as the ratio of a driving potential to the corresponding transfer rate, the
conduction thermal resistance can be written as,
𝑇1 − 𝑇2 𝐿
𝑅𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑 = . =
𝑄 𝑘𝐴
For electrical conduction in the same system, Ohm’s law provides an electrical resistance of the
form
𝐸1 − 𝐸2 𝐿
𝑅𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡 = =
𝐼 𝜎𝐴
We can also write a thermal resistance for convection heat transfer from Newton’s Law of cooling
. . (𝑇𝑠 − 𝑇∞ ) (𝑇𝑠 − 𝑇∞ )
𝑄𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣 = ℎ𝐴(𝑇𝑠 − 𝑇∞ ) 𝑜𝑟 𝑄𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣 = =
1 𝑅
ℎ𝐴
And the convection thermal resistance is
𝑻𝒔 − 𝑻∞ 1
𝑹𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒗 = . =
𝑸𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒗 ℎ𝐴
The thermal resistance concept is more appropriate for heat transfer problems with composite
materials in series or parallel as shown in Fig. 2.5.
When a plane surface is covered with insulation, the rate of heat transfer always decreases.
However, the addition of insulation to a cylindrical or spherical surface increases the conduction
resistance but reduces the convection resistance because of the increased surface area. The critical
thickness of insulation corresponds to the condition when the sum of conduction and convection
resistances is a minimum. The rate of heat transfer from the insulated pipe to the surrounding air
can be expressed as (Fig. 2.8)
. 𝑇1 − 𝑇∞
𝑄= 𝑟2
𝑙𝑛 ( )
𝑟1 1
+
2𝑘𝜋𝐿 2𝜋ℎ𝑟2 𝐿
The variation of with the outer radius of the insulation r2 is plotted in Fig. 2.9. The value of r2 at
which reaches a maximum is determined from the requirement that. Solving this for r2 yields the
critical radius of insulation for a cylinder to be and similarly the critical radius of insulation for a
sphere is given by
𝑘 2𝑘
𝑟𝑐𝑟 = ℎ , 𝑟𝑐𝑟 = ℎ
From Fig. 2.8 it can be seen that insulating the pipe may actually increase the rate of heat transfer
from the pipe instead of decreasing it when r2<rcr .
USE OF HEAT SINKS FOR ELECTRICAL COOLING
The term “heat sink” can be used in the general sense of a cool object that absorbs or dissipates
heat without a significant rise in temperature. In the case of cooling of electronic equipment, a
“heat sink” is usually taken to mean a metal plate onto which electronic components are mounted
and which is “finned” to increase the surface area. Commercial heat sinks are rated in terms of
their thermal resistance [oC/W]. This resistance includes BOTH the conduction resistance through
the metal (usually aluminum) and the convection resistance from the metal surfaces to the air.
There are as many different types of heat sink available as there are situations where electronics
require cooling.
We use a fin on a solid object to increase convective heat transfer by increasing surface area. The
fin must be made of a good thermal conductor. Examples of this type of heat transfer enhancement
include:
• Heat sinks on electrical equipment
• Satellite cooling panels
• Radiator panels and oil coolers on power transformers
• Fins on the outside of motors
We are seeking to decrease the total resistance to heat flow when surface convection/radiation
presents the dominant resistance i.e. by INCREASING THE SURFACE AREA.
Figure 5. Increasing the surface area by adding fins in low heat transfer coefficient situation.
To determine the heat transfer rate associated with a fin, we must first obtain the temperature
distribution along the fin. The following assumptions in determining the temperature distribution:
• one-dimensional conduction in the x direction,
• Steady-state conditions,
• Constant thermal conductivity,
• Negligible radiation from the surface,
• heat generation effects are absent, and
• Convection heat transfer coefficient h is uniform over the surface.
ℎ𝑃
𝑚=√
𝑘𝐴𝑐
Or
𝜃(𝑥) ℎ𝑃
−√ 𝑥
= 𝑒 𝑘𝐴𝑐
𝜃𝑏
The heat removed by the fin at base is
. 𝑑𝑇 𝑑𝜃
𝑄𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 = −𝑘𝐴𝑐 | = −𝑘𝐴𝑐 |
𝑑𝑥 𝑥=0 𝑑𝑥 𝑥=0
. ℎ𝑃
𝑄𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 = 𝑘𝐴𝑐 𝜃𝑏 𝑚 = 𝑘𝐴𝑐 𝜃𝑏 √
𝑘𝐴𝑐
.
𝑄𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 = 𝜃𝑏 √ℎ𝑃𝑘𝐴𝑐
II. Negligible heat loss from fin tip
𝒅𝜽
( | = 𝟎)
𝒅𝒙 𝒙=𝑳
𝑑𝜃
| = 𝑚(𝐶1 𝑒 𝑚𝐿 − 𝐶2 𝑒 −𝑚𝐿 ) = 0
𝑑𝑥 𝑥=𝐿
The heat loss from fin base is
.
𝑄𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 = 𝜃𝑏 √ℎ𝑃𝑘𝐴𝑐 𝑡𝑎𝑛ℎ( 𝑚𝐿)
III. Convection from fin tip
. 𝑑𝑇
𝑄 = ℎ𝐴𝑐 (𝑇|𝑥=𝐿 − 𝑇∞ ) = −𝑘𝐴𝑐 |
𝑑𝑥 𝑥=𝐿
𝑑𝜃
ℎ𝐴𝑐 𝜃|𝑥=𝐿 = −𝑘𝐴𝑐 |
𝑑𝑥 𝑥=𝐿
The corresponding heat loss from fin base will be,
. 𝑠𝑖𝑛ℎ( 𝑚𝐿) + (ℎ/𝑚𝐾) 𝑐𝑜𝑠ℎ( 𝑚𝐿)
𝑄𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 = 𝜃𝑏 √ℎ𝑃𝑘𝐴𝑐
𝑐𝑜𝑠ℎ( 𝑚𝐿) + (ℎ/𝑚𝑘) 𝑠𝑖𝑛ℎ( 𝑚𝐿)
Fin Effectiveness
The performance of fins is judged on the basis of the enhancement in the heat transfer relative to
the no-fin case. The performance of fins expressed in terms of the fin effectiveness efin is defined
as (Fig. 2.13)
The temperature of a fin drops along the fin exponentially and reaches the environment
temperature at some length. The part of the fin beyond this length does not contribute to the heat
transfer. Designing such an extra-long fin results in material waste, excessive weight and increased
size and cost.
To get the sense of the proper length of a fin, we compare the heat transfer from a fin of finite
length to the heat transfer from an infinitely long fin with the same conditions.
.
𝑄𝑓𝑖𝑛 √ℎ𝑝𝑘𝐴𝑐 (𝑇𝑏 − 𝑇∞ ) 𝑡𝑎𝑛ℎ( 𝑚𝐿)
𝐻𝑒𝑎𝑡𝑇𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 = . = = 𝑡𝑎𝑛ℎ( 𝑚𝐿)
𝑄𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑓𝑖𝑛 √ℎ𝑝𝑘𝐴𝑐 (𝑇𝑏 − 𝑇∞ )
This ratio becomes unity for mL2.5 as can be seen from Fig. 2.15. Therefore, gives proper length
of a fin and the designer should make proper compromise between heat transfer performance and
fin size.
Conduction with thermal energy generation
QUESTIONS
1) A long hollow cylinder has its inner and outer surfaces maintained at temperatures Tb and
Ta, respectively. The inner and outer radii are b and a, respectively. Calculate the
temperature profile in the solid section of the cylinder and determine the flux at both
surfaces. Comment on the results. Assume steady-state conditions.
𝑻𝒂 − 𝑻𝒃 𝒓
𝑻 = 𝑻𝒃 + [ ] 𝒍𝒏 ( )
𝒍𝒏(𝒂/𝒃) 𝒃
𝑻𝒂 −𝑻𝒃 𝟏 𝑻𝒂 −𝑻𝒃 𝟏
𝑸̇|𝒓=𝒂 = −𝒌 [𝒍𝒏(𝒂/𝒃) ] 𝒍𝒏 (𝒂), and 𝑸̇|𝒓=𝒃 = −𝒌 [𝒍𝒏(𝒂/𝒃) ] 𝒍𝒏 (𝒃)
Although the fluxes are not equal, one can easily show that the rate of energy transfer, Q, at both
surfaces are equal.
𝐪(𝐋)−𝐪(𝟎) 𝟏𝟎,𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝐖/ 𝐦𝟐 −𝟎
(a) 𝐪̇ 𝐱 = 𝟐 × 𝟏𝟎𝟓 𝐖 / 𝐦𝟑 ,(b) 𝐪(𝐋) = 𝟏𝟎, 𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝐖/ 𝐦𝟐 and (c) 𝐪̇ 𝐱 = = =
𝐋 𝟎.𝟎𝟓𝐦
𝟐 × 𝟏𝟎𝟓 𝐖 / 𝐦𝟑
4) The composite wall of an oven consists of three materials, two of which are known thermal
conductivity, kA=20 W/m.K and kC=50 W/m.K, and known thickness, LA= 0.30m and LC=
0.15 m. The third material, B, which is sandwiched between materials A and C, is of known
thickness, LB= 0.15 m, but unknown thermal conductivity kB. Under steady-state operating
conditions, measurements reveal an outer surface temperature of Ts,0= 20 ℃, an inner
surface temperature of Ts,i= 600 ℃ and an oven air temperature of
T =800 ℃. The inside convection coefficient h is known to be 25 W/m2.K. What is the
value of kB?
kB = 1.53 W/m.K
5) A long, circular aluminium rod attached at one end to the heated wall and transfers heat
through convection to a cold fluid. (a) If the diameter of the rod is triples, by how much
would the rate of heat removal change? (b) If a copper rod of the same diameter is used in
place of aluminium, by how much would the rate of heat removal change?
a) 520 % increase in heat transfer and b) 29 % increase in the heat transfer rate
Comments: (1) because fin effectiveness is enhanced by maximum P/Ac = 4/D. the use of
a larger number of small diameter fins is preferred to a single large diameter fin. (2) From
the standpoint of cost and weight, aluminum is preferred over copper.
6) Determine the percentage increase in heat transfer associated with attaching aluminium
fins of rectangular profile to a plane wall. The fins are 50 mm long, 0.5 mm thick, and are
equally spaced at a distance of 4mm (250 fins/m). The convection coefficient affected
associated with the bare wall is 40 W/m2.K, while that resulting from attachment of the
fins is 30 W/m2.K.
Percentage increases in heat transfer is 1416%
There are different finite difference equations for interior and boundary nodes.
1. For interior node (m, n) of Fig. 2.22, the finite difference equation can be obtained, assuming
unit depth, as
. . . .
𝑄(𝑚,𝑛+1)→(𝑚,𝑛) + 𝑄(𝑚,𝑛−1)→(𝑚,𝑛) + 𝑄(𝑚+1,𝑛)→(𝑚,𝑛) + 𝑄(𝑚−1,𝑛)→(𝑚,𝑛) = 0
𝑇(𝑚,𝑛+1) − 𝑇(𝑚,𝑛) 𝑇(𝑚,𝑛−1) − 𝑇(𝑚,𝑛) 𝑇(𝑚+1,𝑛) − 𝑇(𝑚,𝑛)
𝑘𝛥𝑥. 1 ( ) + 𝑘𝛥𝑥. 1 ( ) + 𝑘𝛥𝑦. 1 ( )
𝛥𝑦 𝛥𝑦 𝛥𝑥
𝑇(𝑚−1,𝑛) − 𝑇(𝑚,𝑛)
+ 𝑘𝛥𝑦. 1 ( )=0
𝛥𝑥
for x=y, the above equation simplifies to
𝑇(𝑚,𝑛+1) + 𝑇(𝑚,𝑛−1) + 𝑇(𝑚+1,𝑛) + 𝑇(𝑚−1,𝑛) − 4𝑇(𝑚,𝑛) = 0
Fig. 2.22 Different finite difference equations for interior and boundary nodes
Solution of the finite difference equations
The equations obtained for each type of node reduce the heat transfer problem to solving of system
of linear equations, which can be written in matrix notation as,
[𝐴]{𝑇} = {𝐶}
Where [A] is coefficient matrix, {T} is vector of nodal temperatures and {C} is vector of constants
obtained from boundary conditions.
𝑎11 𝑎12 . . . . 𝑎1𝑛 𝑇1 𝐶1
𝑎21 𝑎22 . . . . 𝑎2𝑛 𝑇2 𝐶2
... . .
[𝐴] = {𝑇} = {𝐶} =
... . .
... . .
[𝑎𝑛1 𝑎𝑛2 . . . . 𝑎𝑛𝑛 ] {𝑇𝑛 } {𝐶𝑛 }
The Equation can be solved using either the matrix inversion or the iterative methods. In the matrix
inversion method, the nodal temperatures will be obtained from
{𝑇} = [𝐴]−1 {𝐶}
Gauss-Seidel Iteration method is one of the methods for solving linear system of equations, the
steps are
a) Solve each equation for one of the variables (one with larger coefficient) in terms of other
variables,
b) Make initial guess for each unknown,
c) Using equations from step 1, find new values for each unknown,
d) Repeat step 3 until a desired convergence criterion is satisfied.
Graphical Method: Conduction Shape Factor
This approach applied to 2-D conduction involving two isothermal surfaces, with all other
surfaces being adiabatic. The heat transfer from one surface (at a temperature 𝑇1 ) to the other
surface (at 𝑇2 ) can be expressed as: 𝑞 = 𝑆𝑘(𝑇1 − 𝑇2 ) where k is the thermal conductivity of
the solid and 𝑆 is the conduction shape factor. The shape factor can be related to the thermal
resistance:
𝑞 = 𝑆𝑘(𝑇1 − 𝑇2 ) = (𝑇1 − 𝑇2 )/(1/𝑆𝑘) = (𝑇1 − 𝑇2 )/𝑅𝑡
where 𝑅𝑡 = 1/(𝑘𝑆) is the thermal resistance in 2D. Note that 1-D heat transfer can also use
the concept of shape factor. For example, heat transfer inside a plane wall of thickness L is
𝑞 = 𝑘𝐴(∆𝑇/𝐿), where the shape factor 𝑆 = 𝐴/𝐿 .Common shape factors for selected
configurations can be found in Table 4.1.
QUESTIONS
1) A two-dimensional rectangular plate is subjected to the uniform temperature boundary
conditions shown. Using the results of the analytical solution for the heat equation,
calculate the temperature at the midpoint (1, 0.5) by considering the first five nonzero terms
of the infinite series that must be evaluated. Assess the error from using only the first three
terms of the infinite series.
2) A long power transmission cable is buried at a depth (ground to cable centerline distance)
of 2m. The cable is encased in a thin walled pipe of 0.1 m diameter, and to render the cable
superconducting (essentially zero power dissipation), the space between the cable and pipe
is filled with liquid nitrogen at 77 K. If the pipe is covered a super
insulator(ki=0.005W/m.K) of 0.05 m thickness and the surface of the earth (kg=1.2 W/m.K)
is at 300K, what is the cooling load in W/m which must be maintained by a cryogenic
refrigerator per unit pipe length.
𝒒̇ = 𝟗. 𝟗 𝐖/𝐦,
𝒒̇ = 𝟏𝟏𝟎 𝐖/𝐦
𝒒̇ = 𝟓. 𝟑𝟎 𝐖/𝐦
5) Consider nodal configuration below. Derive the finite-difference equation under steady-
state conditions for the following situations. (a) The upper boundary of the external corner
is perfectly insulated and the side boundary is subjected to the convection process (T∞, h)
(b) Both boundaries of external corner are perfectly insulated.
The variation of temperature of the hot metal with time can be obtained by applying energy balance
within a time interval of dt.
Heat transfer from the body during dt =
decrease in the energy content of the body in dt
. . 𝑑𝑇
𝑄𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣 = 𝐸𝑂𝑢𝑡 =ℎ𝐴(𝑇 − 𝑇∞ ) = −𝑚𝐶𝑝 𝑑𝑡
Rearranging the equation and noting that dT=d(T-T∞), since T∞ is constant, we obtain
𝑑𝑇 −ℎ𝐴
= 𝑑𝑡
𝑇 − 𝑇∞ 𝑚𝐶𝑝
Integration of the equation gives us
−ℎ𝐴
𝑇(𝑡) − 𝑇∞ 𝑚𝐶𝑝
𝑡
=𝑒
𝑇𝑖 − 𝑇∞
The temperature of the metal gradually decreases and eventually equals the ambient air
temperature. The maximum amount of heat transfer is,
.
𝑄𝑚𝑎𝑥 = −𝑚𝐶𝑝 (𝑇∞ − 𝑇i ) = 𝑚𝐶𝑝 (𝑇i − 𝑇∞ )
Validity of lumped capacitance method
The lumped capacitance analysis gives us a simple and convenient way of analyzing transient heat
transfer problems. But this method is ideal since it assumes uniform temperature distribution
within a body at an instant and it is better to know when to use it. Before establishing a criterion
for the validity of the method, it is worthy to define the terms known as characteristic length, Lc,
and Biot number, Bi.
𝑉 ℎ𝐿𝑐
𝐿𝑐 = , 𝐵𝑖 =
𝐴 𝑘
The Biot number can also be expressed as
𝑇(𝑥, 𝑡) − 𝑇∞
𝜃(𝑥, 𝑡) = Dimensionless temperature
𝑇𝑖 − 𝑇∞
𝑥
𝑋= Dimensionless distance from center
𝐿
ℎ𝐿
𝐵𝑖 = Biot number (Dimensionless heat transfer coefficient)
𝑘
𝛼𝑡
𝜏= 2 Fourier number (Dimensionless time)
𝐿
For Fourier number, the infinite series solutions can be approximated by taking only the first terms
of the series. These solutions are given below,
𝑇(𝑥, 𝑡) − 𝑇∞ 2 𝜆1 𝑥
𝜃(𝑥, 𝑡)𝑤𝑎𝑙𝑙 = = 𝐴1 𝑒 −𝜆1 𝜏 𝑐𝑜𝑠 ( ) , 𝜏 > 0.2
𝑇𝑖 − 𝑇∞ 𝐿
𝑇(𝑟, 𝑡) − 𝑇∞ 2 𝜆1 𝑟
𝜃(𝑟, 𝑡)𝑐𝑦𝑙 = = 𝐴1 𝑒 −𝜆1 𝜏 𝐽𝑜 ( ) , 𝜏 > 0.2
𝑇𝑖 − 𝑇∞ 𝑟𝑜
𝜆 𝑟
𝑇(𝑟, 𝑡) − 𝑇∞ 2
𝑠𝑖𝑛 ( 𝑟1 )
𝑜
𝜃(𝑟, 𝑡)𝑠𝑝ℎ = = 𝐴1 𝑒 −𝜆1 𝜏 , 𝜏 > 0.2
𝑇𝑖 − 𝑇∞ 𝜆1 𝑟
𝑟𝑜
The constants A1 and 1 are obtained from table. The function J0 is the zeroth-order Bessel function
of the first kind whose value can be determined from Table. The temperature of the body changes
from Ti to T∞ at the end of the transient heat conduction. The maximum amount of heat transfer
during this process can be obtained by
.
𝑄𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝑚𝐶𝑝 (𝑇∞ − 𝑇i ) = 𝜌𝑉𝐶𝑝 (𝑇∞ − 𝑇i )
The fraction of heat transfer within time t is obtained by the following equations for the large wall,
long cylinder and sphere.
𝑄 2 𝑠𝑖𝑛( 𝜆1 )
( ()𝑤𝑎𝑙𝑙 1 −𝜆1 𝜏
)
𝑄𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝜆1
𝑄 2 𝐽1 (𝜆1 )
( ()𝑐𝑦𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 1 −𝜆1 𝜏 )
𝑄𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝜆1
𝑄 2 𝑠𝑖𝑛( 𝜆1 ) − 𝜆1 𝑐𝑜𝑠( 𝜆1 )
( ()𝑤𝑎𝑙𝑙 1 −𝜆1 𝜏 )
𝑄𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝜆13
Chapter 6 and 7: Convection Heat Transfer
Convection heat transfer takes place between a surface and a moving fluid, when they are at
different temperatures. In a strict sense, convection is not a basic mode of heat transfer as the heat
transfer from the surface to the fluid consists of two mechanisms operating simultaneously. The
first one is energy transfer due to molecular motion (conduction) through a fluid layer adjacent to
the surface, which remains stationary with respect to the solid surface due to no-slip condition.
Superimposed upon this conductive mode is energy transfer by the macroscopic motion of fluid
particles by virtue of an external force, which could be generated by a pump or fan (forced
convection) or generated due to buoyancy, caused by density gradients (free convection).
When fluid flows over a surface, its velocity and temperature adjacent to the surface are same as
that of the surface due to the no-slip condition. The velocity and temperature far away from the
surface may remain unaffected. The region in which the velocity and temperature vary from that
of the surface to that of the free stream are called as hydrodynamic and thermal boundary layers,
respectively.
Figure 7.2 show that fluid with free stream velocity 𝑈∞ flows over a flat plate. In the vicinity of
the surface as shown in Figure 7.2, the velocity tends to vary from zero (when the surface is
stationary) to its free stream value 𝑈∞ . This happens in a narrow region whose thickness is of the
order of (𝑅𝑒𝐿 )−0.5 (𝑅𝑒𝐿 = 𝑈∞ 𝐿/𝑣) where there is a sharp velocity gradient. This narrow region
is called hydrodynamic boundary layer. In the hydrodynamic boundary layer region, the inertial
terms are of same order magnitude as the viscous terms. Similarly, to the velocity gradient, there
is a sharp temperature gradient in this vicinity of the surface if the temperature of the surface of
the plate is different from that of the flow stream. This region is called thermal boundary layer, 𝛿𝑡
whose thickness is of the order of (𝑅𝑒𝐿 𝑃𝑟 )−0.5, where Pr is the Prandtl number, given by:
𝐶𝑝,𝑓 𝜇𝑓 𝑣𝑓
𝑃𝑟 = =
𝑘𝑓 𝛼𝑓
In the expression for Prandtl number, all the properties refer to the flowing fluid.
In the thermal boundary layer region, the conduction terms are of same order of magnitude as the
convection terms.
Fig. 7.2. Velocity distribution of flow over a flat plate
The momentum transfer is related to kinematic viscosity ν while the diffusion of heat is related to
thermal diffusivity α hence the ratio of thermal boundary layer to viscous boundary layer is related
to the ratio ν/α, Prandtl number. From the expressions for boundary layer thickness, it can be seen
that the ratio of thermal boundary layer thickness to the viscous boundary layer thickness depends
upon Prandtl number. For large Prandtl numbers 𝛿𝑡 < 𝛿 and for small Prandtl numbers, 𝛿𝑡 > 𝛿. It
can also be seen that as the Reynolds number increases, the boundary layers become narrow, the
temperature gradient becomes large and the heat transfer rate increases.
Since the heat transfer from the surface is by molecular conduction, it depends upon the
temperature gradient in the fluid in the immediate vicinity of the surface, i.e.
𝑑𝑇
𝑄 = −𝐴 𝑘𝑓 |
𝑑𝑦 𝑦=0
Since temperature difference has been recognized as the potential for heat transfer it is convenient
to express convective heat transfer rate as proportional to it, i.e.
𝜕𝑇
𝑄 = −𝐴 𝑘𝑓 | = 𝐴ℎ𝑐 (𝑇𝑆 − 𝑇∞ )
𝜕𝑦 𝑦=0
The above equation defines the convective heat transfer coefficient ℎ𝑐 .This equation is also
referred to as Newton’s law of cooling [𝑄 = 𝐴ℎ𝑐 (𝑇𝑆 − 𝑇∞ )]From the above equation it can be
seen that the convective heat transfer coefficient ℎ𝑐 is given by:
−𝑘𝑓 𝑑𝑇/𝑑𝑦|𝑦=0
ℎ𝑐 =
𝑇𝑆 − 𝑇∞
The above equation suggests that the convective heat transfer coefficient (hence heat transfer by
convection) depends on the temperature gradient 𝑑𝑇/𝑑𝑦|𝑦=0 near the surface in addition to the
thermal conductivity of the fluid and the temperature difference. The temperature gradient near
the wall depends on the rate at which the fluid near the wall can transport energy into the
mainstream. Thus, the temperature gradient depends on the flow field, with higher velocities able
to pressure sharper temperature gradients and hence higher heat transfer rates. Thus, determination
of convection heat transfer requires the application of laws of fluid mechanics in addition to the
laws of heat transfer.
Table 7.2 Typical order-of magnitude values of convective heat transfer coefficients
Type of fluid and flow Convective heat transfer coefficient 𝒉𝒄 , (W/m2 K)
Air free convection 6 – 30
Water free convection 20 – 100
Air or superheated steam, forced convection 30 – 300
Oil, forced convection 60 – 1800
Water, forced convection 300 – 18000
Synthetic refrigerants, boiling 500 - 3000
Water, boiling 3000 – 60000
Synthetic refrigerants, condensing 1500 - 5000
Steam, condensing 6000 – 120000
Traditionally, from the manner in which the convection heat transfer rate is defined, evaluating the
convective heat transfer coefficient has become the main objective of the problem. The convective
heat transfer coefficient can vary widely depending upon the type of fluid and flow field and
temperature difference. Table 7.2 shows typical order-of-magnitude values of convective heat
transfer coefficients for different conditions.
Convective heat transfer resistance: Similar to conduction and radiation, convective heat transfer
rate can be written in terms of a potential and resistance, i.e.,
𝑇𝑆 − 𝑇∞
𝑄 = 𝐴ℎ𝑐 (𝑇𝑆 − 𝑇∞ ) =
𝑅𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣
1
where the convective heat transfer resistance, 𝑅𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣 = 𝐴ℎ
𝑐
Important Definitions
Boundary layer: A region of fluid in the immediate vicinity of a bounding surface where strong
gradients of velocity (and, potentially, other variables such as temperature) occur. Outside the
boundary layer, the fluid has little to no awareness of the bounding surface. Note that the vertical
shear caused by the surface generates turbulence, which then promotes mixing. Outside the
boundary layer, fluid often mixes only very slowly because turbulence is relatively uncommon.
Outer layer: The region outside of the inertial sublayer.
Inertial sublayer: The region of the boundary with the strongest gradients in velocity (and,
therefore, temperature, moisture, etc.). Typically, the surface layer is ∼10% of the thickness of the
boundary layer.
Viscous sublayer: The region of the boundary where viscous diffusion dominates turbulent
diffusion.
No-slip condition: The requirement that the relative velocity between a fluid and solid is zero at
the fluid /solid interface.
Determination of convective heat transfer coefficient:
Evaluation of convective heat transfer coefficient is difficult as the physical phenomenon is quite
complex. Analytically, it can be determined by solving the mass, momentum and energy equations.
However, analytical solutions are available only for very simple situations, hence most of the
convection heat transfer data is obtained through careful experiments, and the equations suggested
for convective heat transfer coefficients are mostly empirical. Since the equations are of empirical
nature, each equation is applicable to specific cases. Generalization has been made possible to
some extent by using several non-dimensional numbers such as Reynolds number, Prandtl number,
Nusselt number, Grashoff number, Rayleigh number etc.
Physical Interpretation of Convective Correlation
The Reynolds number is a familiar term to all of us, but we may benefit by considering what the
ratio tells us. Recall that the thickness of the dynamic boundary layer, δ, is proportional to the
distance along the plate, x.
𝑈∞ 𝐿𝜌 𝑈∞ 𝛿𝜌 𝑈∞ 2 𝜌
𝑅𝑒𝐿 ≡ ∝ ∝
μ μ μ𝑈∞
𝛿
The numerator is a mass flow per unit area times a velocity; i.e., a momentum flow per unit area.
The denominator is a viscous stress, i.e., a viscous force per unit area. The ratio represents the ratio
of momentum to viscous forces. If viscous forces dominate, the flow will be laminar; if momentum
dominates, the flow will be turbulent.
Physical Meaning of Prandtl Number
The Prandtl number was introduced earlier.
If we multiply and divide the equation by the fluid density, ρ, we obtain:
𝐶𝑝,𝑓 𝜇𝑓 𝑣𝑓
𝑃𝑟 ≡ =
𝑘𝑓 𝛼𝑓
𝑘𝑓 𝜇𝑓 𝑣𝑓
𝑃𝑟 = =
𝜌𝐶𝑝,𝑓 𝜌 𝛼𝑓
𝑣 = μ/𝜌
The Prandtl number may be seen to be a ratio reflecting the ratio of the rate that viscous forces
penetrate the material to the rate that thermal energy penetrates the material. As a consequence,
the Prandtl number is proportional to the rate of growth of the two boundary layers:
𝛿
= 𝑃𝑟 1/3
𝛿𝑡
Physical Meaning of Nusselt Number
The Nusselt number may be physically described as well.
ℎ𝑐 𝑥
Nu𝑥 ≡
𝑘𝑓
If we recall that the thickness of the boundary layer at any point along the surface, δ, is also a
function of x then
𝛿
ℎ𝑐 𝑥 ℎ𝑐 𝛿 𝑘𝑓 𝐴
Nu𝑥 ∝ ∝ ∝
𝑘𝑓 𝑘𝑓 1
ℎ𝑐 𝐴
We see that the Nusselt may be viewed as the ratio of the conduction resistance of a material to
the convection resistance of the same material.
Students, recalling the Biot number, may wish to compare the two so that they may distinguish the
two.
ℎ𝑐 𝑥 ℎ𝑐 𝑥
𝑁𝑢𝑥 ≡ 𝐵𝑖𝑥 ≡
𝑘𝑓 𝑘𝑠
The denominator of the Nusselt number involves the thermal conductivity of the fluid at the
solid-fluid convective interface; the denominator of the Biot number involves the thermal
conductivity of the solid at the solid-fluid convective interface.
Reynolds Analogy
In the development of the boundary layer theory, one may notice the strong relationship between
the dynamic boundary layer and the thermal boundary layer. Reynolds’s noted the strong
correlation and found that fluid friction and convection coefficient could be related. This refers
to the Reynolds Analogy.
𝐶𝑓
𝑃𝑟 = 1 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑛 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 = 2
Conclusion from Reynolds’s analogy: Knowing the frictional drag, we know the Nusselt
Number. If the drag coefficient is increased, say through increased wall roughness, then the
convective coefficient will increase. If the wall friction is decreased, the convective coefficient is
decreased. Some of the most important and commonly used correlations are given below:
Heat transfer coefficient inside tubes, ducts etc.:
When a fluid flows through a conduit such as a tube, the fluid flow and heat transfer characteristics
at the entrance region will be different from the rest of the tube. Flow in the entrance region is
called as developing flow as the boundary layers form and develop in this region. The length of
the entrance region depends upon the type of flow, type of surface, type of fluid etc. The region
beyond this entrance region is known as fully developed region as the boundary layers fill the
entire conduit and the velocity and temperature profiles remain essentially unchanged. In general,
the entrance effects are important only in short tubes and ducts. Correlations are available in
literature for both entrance as well as fully developed regions. In most of the practical applications
the flow will be generally fully developed as the lengths used are large. The following are some
important correlations applicable to fully developed flows:
a) Fully developed laminar flow inside tubes (internal diameter D):
Constant wall temperature condition:
ℎ𝑐 𝐷
Nusselt number, Nu𝐷 = = 3.66
𝑘𝑓
ℎ𝑐 𝐷
Nusselt number, Nu𝐷 = = 4.364
𝑘𝑓
𝜇𝑏
0.08< ( ) <40
𝜇𝑠
The average Nusselt number is obtained by integrating local Nusselt number from 0 to L and
dividing by L.
1 1
where 𝑐 and 𝑛 are 0.59 and 4 for laminar flow (104 < 𝐺𝑟𝐿 𝑃𝑟 < 109 ) and 0.10 and 3 for turbulent
flow (109 < 𝐺𝑟𝐿 𝑃𝑟 < 1013 ). 𝐺𝑟𝐿 𝑃𝑟 is Rayleigh number (𝑅𝑎). [ 𝑹𝒂 = 𝑮𝒓𝑳 𝑷𝒓]
𝑅𝑎 < 109 , 𝐥𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐫 𝐟𝐫𝐞𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, and 𝑅𝑎 > 1013 , 𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐛𝐮𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐟𝐫𝐞𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧
In the above equation, 𝐺𝑟𝐿 is the average Grashoff number given by:
gβ(𝑇𝑆 −𝑇∞ )𝐿3
Average Grashoff Number, 𝐺𝑟𝐿 = 𝑣2
where g is the acceleration due to gravity, β is volumetric coefficient of thermal expansion, 𝑇𝑆 and
𝑇∞ are the plate and the free stream fluid temperatures, respectively and ν is the kinematic
viscosity.
Constant wall heat flux, 𝑞𝑆 :
ℎ𝑐 𝑥
Local Nusselt number, Nu𝑥 = = 0.60(𝐺𝑟𝑥 ∗ 𝑃𝑟)1/5
𝑘𝑓
gβ𝑞𝑆 𝑥 4
𝐺𝑟𝑥 ∗ =
𝑘𝑓 𝑣 2
The above equation is valid for 105 < 𝐺𝑟𝑥 ∗ 𝑃𝑟 < 1011
f) Free convection over horizontal flat plates:
ℎ 𝐿 ̅̅̅̅
Average Nusselt number, ̅̅̅̅̅
Nu𝐿 = 𝑘𝑐 = 𝑐(𝐺𝑟𝐿 𝑃𝑟)𝑛
𝑓
In the above free convection equations, the fluid properties have to be evaluated at a mean
temperature defined as 𝑇𝑚 = 𝑇𝑆 − 0.25(𝑇𝑆 − 𝑇∞ ). The values of c and n are given in Table 7.3 for
different orientations and flow regimes.
Table 7.3 Values of c and n
Orientation of plate Range of c n Flow
𝑮𝒓𝑳 𝑷𝒓 regime
105 to 2*107 0.54 1/4 Laminar
Hot surface facing up or cold surface facing down,
2*107 to 0.14 1/3 Turbulent
constant 𝑻𝑺
3*1010
Hot surface facing down or cold surface facing up, 3*105 to 0.27 1/4 Laminar
constant 𝑻𝑺 3*1010
< 2*108 0.13 1/3
Hot surface facing up, constant 𝒒𝑺
5*108 to 1011 0.16 1/3
Hot surface facing down, constant 𝒒𝑺 106 to 1011 0.58 1/5
QUESTIONS
1) Air at 20˚C at atmospheric pressure flows over a flat plate at a velocity of 3 m/s. If the plate is
1 m wide and 80˚C, calculate the following at x = 300 mm.
2) The heat flux rate incident on a vertical plate at 110 °C is 800 W/m2 . The plate is 2 m wide
and 3.5 m high and is well insulated on the backside. The ambient air temperature is 30 °C.
All the incident radiation (800 W/m2) on the plate is absorbed and dissipated by free convection
to the ambient air at 30 °C. Determine the Grashof and Rayleigh numbers.
3) The glass window of area 3.0 m2 has a temperature at the outer surface of 10 C. The
conductivity of the glass is 1.4 W/m K. The convection coefficient (heat transfer coefficient)
of the air is 100 W/m K2 . The heat transfer is 3.0 kW. Calculate the bulk temperature of the
fluid.
TM = 273 K = 0 C
4) Identify the following three dimensionless groups:
1. hfL /kf (subscript f refers to fluid)
2. hfL /ks (subscript s refers to solid surface)
3. (Reynolds number) (Prandtl number), i.e., (Re)(Pr)
5) Calculate the free convection heat transfer coefficient and the heat loss for a plate 6 ft high and
8 ft wide at 120 °F that is exposed to nitrogen at 60 °F.
𝒉𝒄 = 𝟎. 𝟔𝟕𝟓𝑩𝒕𝒖/𝒉𝒓 , Q = 1944Btu/hr
6) Calculate the heat transfer from a 100-W light bulb at 113 °C to 31 °C ambient air.
Approximate the bulb as a 60 mm diameter sphere.
Q =33.4W
The temperature profiles of the two heat exchangers indicate two major disadvantages in the
parallel-flow design. First, the large temperature difference at the ends (Figure 10) causes large
thermal stresses. The opposing expansion and contraction of the construction materials due to
diverse fluid temperatures can lead to eventual material failure. Second, the temperature of the
cold fluid exiting the heat exchanger never exceeds the lowest temperature of the hot fluid. This
relationship is a distinct disadvantage if the design purpose is to raise the temperature of the cold
fluid.
The design of a parallel flow heat exchanger is advantageous when two fluids are required to be
brought to nearly the same temperature.
The counter-flow heat exchanger has three significant advantages over the parallel flow design.
First, the more uniform temperature difference between the two fluids minimizes the thermal
stresses throughout the exchanger. Second, the outlet temperature of the cold fluid can approach
the highest temperature of the hot fluid (the inlet temperature). Third, the more uniform
temperature difference produces a more uniform rate of heat transfer throughout the heat
exchanger.
Whether parallel or counter-flow, heat transfer within the heat exchanger involves both conduction
and convection. One fluid (hot) convectively transfers heat to the tube wall where conduction takes
place across the tube to the opposite wall. The heat is then convectively transferred to the second
fluid. Because this process takes place over the entire length of the exchanger, the temperature of
the fluids as they flow through the exchanger is not generally constant, but varies over the entire
length, as indicated in Figure 10. The rate of heat transfer varies along the length of the exchanger
tubes because its value depends upon the temperature difference between the hot and the cold fluid
at the point being viewed.
The second is to reduce the temperature of the water entering the purification system prior to
reaching the non-regenerative heat exchanger, allowing use of a smaller heat exchanger to achieve
the desired temperature for purification. The primary advantage of a regenerative heat exchanger
application is conservation of system energy (that is, less loss of system energy due to the cooling
of the fluid.
Cooling Towers
The typical function of a cooling tower is to cool the water of a steam power plant by air that is
brought into direct contact with the water. The water is mixed with vapor that diffuses from the
condensate into the air. The formation of the vapor requires a considerable removal of internal
energy from the water; the internal energy becomes "latent heat" of the vapor. Heat and mass
exchange are coupled in this process, which is a steady-state process like the heat exchange in the
ordinary heat exchanger.
Wooden cooling towers are sometimes employed in nuclear facilities and in factories of various
industries. They generally consists of large chambers loosely filled with trays or similar wooden
elements of construction. The water to be cooled is pumped to the top of the tower where it is
distributed by spray or wooden troughs. It then falls through the tower, splashing down from deck
to deck. A part of it evaporates into the air that passes through the tower. The enthalpy needed
for the evaporation is taken from the water and transferred to the air, which is heated while the
water cools. The air flow is either horizontal due to wind currents (cross flow) or vertically upward
in counter-flow to the falling water. The counter-flow is caused by the
chimney effect of the warm humid air in the tower or by fans at the bottom (forced draft) or at the
top (induced flow) of the tower. Mechanical draft towers are more economical to construct and
smaller in size than natural-convection towers of the same cooling capacity.
Log Mean Temperature Difference Application To Heat Exchangers
In order to solve certain heat exchanger problems, a log mean temperature difference (LMTD)
must be evaluated before the heat removal from the heat exchanger is determined.