Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Quinolone Antibiotics Induce Shiga Toxin–Encoding Bacteriophages
Quinolone Antibiotics Induce Shiga Toxin–Encoding Bacteriophages
Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) cause significant disease; treatment is sup-
portive and antibiotic use is controversial. Ciprofloxacin but not fosfomycin causes Shiga
toxin–encoding bacteriophage induction and enhanced Shiga toxin (Stx) production from
E. coli O157:H7 in vitro. The potential clinical relevance of this was examined in mice colonized
with E. coli O157:H7 and given either ciprofloxacin or fosfomycin. Both antibiotics caused a
reduction in fecal STEC. However, animals treated with ciprofloxacin had a marked increase
in free fecal Stx, associated with death in two-thirds of the mice, whereas fosfomycin did not.
Experiments that used a kanamycin-marked Stx2 prophage demonstrated that ciprofloxacin,
but not fosfomycin, caused enhanced intraintestinal transfer of Stx2 prophage from one
E. coli to another. These observations suggest that treatment of human STEC infection with
bacteriophage-inducing antibiotics, such as fluoroquinolones, may have significant adverse
clinical consequences and that fluoroquinolone antibiotics may enhance the movement of
virulence factors in vivo.
Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC), such as ferences in response to STEC. It is clear that the production
E. coli O157:H7, are emerging foodborne pathogens in the of Shiga toxins by STEC is one of the most critical factors in
United States and other parts of the world [1, 2]. Ingestion of the development of HUS. It is also probable, but not proven
STEC can result in gastrointestinal symptoms, such as diarrhea in humans, that the more toxin that is made, the more likely
and hemorrhagic colitis, and may also progress to hemolytic- a patient will develop significant medical problems. However,
uremic syndrome (HUS), a severe sequela of this infection [3]. the factors that control toxin production in the intestine and
STEC have become the most frequent cause of acute renal the processes that are critical in the movement of toxin from
failure in children in the United States in recent years and are the intestinal lumen to their final target in the kidney, brain,
currently one of the most devastating foodborne pathogens in and other organs are as yet undetermined.
many parts of the world. Little is known about the molecular The Shiga toxin family is made up of 2 main groups, Shiga
mechanisms leading to the development of the most serious toxin 1 (Stx1) and Shiga toxin 2 (Stx2), produced by E. coli
complications, such as HUS, but it is likely that different in- O157:H7 and many other STEC serotypes. Both are usually
dividuals respond to exposure to STEC in different ways. It is encoded in the genomes of lysogenic lambdoid phages, thereby
not clear why some people develop a mild gastrointestinal ill- allowing a mechanism for toxin gene dissemination via transfer
ness, whereas others develop hemorrhagic colitis and still others
of bacteriophages [4, 5]. Recent studies suggest that the life
develop full-blown HUS. Many factors, including both host
cycles of these Stx phages regulate toxin production and thereby
and bacterial determinants, may be responsible for these dif-
may influence pathogenesis [6]. In particular, Stx prophage in-
duction has been associated with increased Stx production in
Received 27 May 1999; revised 20 September 1999; electronically pub- vitro [7]. Stx prophages, like l prophages, are inducible with
lished 8 February 2000. agents that provoke the bacterial “SOS” response to DNA
Presented in part: IX International Congress of Bacteriology and Applied
Microbiology, Sydney, Australia, August 1999. damage and/or to the inhibition of DNA replication. Thus, the
Financial support: NIH (AI-39067, AI-07329, and DK-34928). M.K.W. induction of Stx prophages by the alkylating agent mitomycin
is a Pew Scholar in the Biomedical Sciences and a Tupper Research Fellow.
a
Present affiliations: Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy,
C is associated with significant increases in Stx production in
Rutgers, State University of New Jersey, Piscataway (X.Z.); University of vitro [7]. In recA2 STEC strains, this SOS-triggering agent does
Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles (A.D.M.); Depart- not induce Stx prophages or augment Stx production [7]. Be-
ment of Medicine, Northeast Health Systems, Beverly, Massachusetts
(L.E.W.). cause RecA is known to be required for the initiation of the
Reprints or correspondence: Dr. David W. K. Acheson, Division of Geo- SOS response, but is not thought to directly regulate Stx pro-
graphic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, New England Medical Center,
duction, these findings indicate that phage induction is a re-
750 Washington St., Boston, MA 02111 (Dacheson@Lifespan.org).
quired step in the augmentation of toxin production that occurs
The Journal of Infectious Diseases 2000; 181:664–70
q 2000 by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved.
following exposure of STEC to SOS-inducing agents.
0022-1899/2000/18102-0034$02.00 The clinical relevance of prophage-mediated Stx production
JID 2000;181 (February) Quinolone Antibiotics Induce Shiga Toxins In Vivo 665
is suggested by the observation that patients treated with mi- thi) [21]; both were from our laboratory collection of bacterial
tomycin C have been reported to develop HUS [8]. Several strains. MC4100 lysogens of Stx2 phage 933W [4] and 933W-Kn
clinically useful antibiotics known to induce the SOS response, (see below), MC4100 (933W) and MC4100 (933W-Kn), respec-
including trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (commonly used to tively, were isolated as described elsewhere [7]. C600 (933W) is an
E. coli C600 lysogen of Stx2 phage 933W [4].
treat diarrheal disease in children) and ciprofloxacin (commonly
Quantitation of colony-forming units and plaque-forming units. follows. Previous in vitro experiments suggested that subinhibitory
Samples from both in vitro and in vivo experiments were serially concentrations of ciprofloxacin caused maximal increases in Stx
diluted in PBS and plated onto LB agar plates containing strep- (data not shown). In initial experiments, we determined a dose of
tomycin at 500 mg/mL. Colony-forming units were counted after ciprofloxacin that caused a significant drop in fecal 1:361R colony-
overnight culture at 377C. Samples collected in the mouse lysogenic forming units (∼3 logs) but did not kill all of the organisms. The
Table 1. Ciprofloxacin induces Shiga toxin (Stx) prophage and augments Stx production
from Escherichia coli O157:H7 strain 1:361R.
Phage titer Stx concentration Cell no.
(pfu/mL 3103) (ng/mL) (cfu/mL 3106)
Time (h) Control Cpfx Fm Control Cpfx Fm Control Cpfx Fm
110,000-fold reduction in recoverable 1:361R colony-forming of 1:361R-colonized mice was reproduced in 2 subsequent ex-
units in the culture containing ciprofloxacin, probably a result periments. In the first of the repeat experiments, we observed
of cell killing by both the antibiotic and phage-mediated cell death in 4 of 7 ciprofloxacin-treated mice and in 0 of 6 PBS-
lysis. Thus, ciprofloxacin resulted in marked Stx prophage in- treated mice, and in the second experiment, 7 of 8 ciprofloxacin-
duction and increases in Stx production from Stx phage lyso- treated mice died. The mortality observed in the ciprofloxacin-
gens, similar to our previously reported results with mitomycin treated mice is not attributable to the antibiotic treatment alone,
C [7]. Stx prophage induction and increase in Stx production because there were no deaths in a separate control group of 6
are not nonspecific responses to antimicrobial agents. Despite mice that were treated with streptomycin and then with cip-
the fact that the fosfomycin-treated cultures had recovered by rofloxacin as above but that were not colonized with 1:361R
6 h, the drug resulted in a decline in 1:361R colony-forming (data not shown). There was no significant difference in the
units at 3 h but, unlike ciprofloxacin, had no effect on the amounts of fecal Stx2 detected in the fosfomycin-treated mice
induction of 1:361R Stx prophages or toxin production, com- compared with control (PBS-treated) mice (figure 2C vs. fig-
pared with controls (table 1). ure 2A).
Effect of ciprofloxacin or fosfomycin treatment in mice colo- Effect of ciprofloxacin on intraintestinal phage production in
nized with E. coli O157:H7. To address the potential clinical mice. To explore whether treatment of mice with ciproflox-
ramifications of antibiotic induction of Stx prophages and toxin acin leads to increased intraintestinal Stx phage production
production, we then compared the effects of ciprofloxacin and from a lysogen as seen in vitro, we used an intraintestinal Stx
fosfomycin on intestinal toxin production and mortality in mice phage lysogenic conversion assay that we recently described
colonized with 1:361R. To facilitate intestinal colonization with elsewhere [19], which involves intraintestinal transduction of a
this O157:H7 strain, CD-1 mice were given streptomycin [15] marked E. coli recipient strain (a TcR derivative of E. coli K12
for 2 days and then orally inoculated with 1:361R. In each set strain MC4100 [19]) to KnR by a Kn-marked Stx phage. This
of experiments, the mice were divided into equal groups on day phage, 933W-Kn, is harbored in an E. coli K12 strain, MC4100
4. One group received an antibiotic (either ciprofloxacin or (933W-Kn), the donor strain. After intragastric inoculation of
fosfomycin) and the other group received PBS. In control mice, the donor and recipient strains to 5 mice, the number of donor
the pattern of 1:361R intestinal colonization and toxin pro- cells (SmR KnR), recipient cells (SmR TcR), and “transductant”
duction in individual mice was consistent (figures 1A and 2A). cells (those recipient cells lysogenically converted to kanamycin
Fecal Stx was detectable 1 day after inoculation and declined resistance [SmR TcR KnR]) in fecal samples were determined
thereafter as the 1:361R excretion dropped (figures 1A and 2A). daily. Two days after the inoculation of the donor and recipient
After treatment with either antibiotic, there was a more rapid strains, mice were injected intraperitoneally with either cipro-
fall in fecal STEC colony-forming units than was observed in floxacin, fosfomycin, or PBS at the same doses used in our
the PBS control group (figure 1), with values differing by 3 previous experiments. Because there is no biologically active
orders of magnitude. Despite causing similar decreases in col- Stx-producing strain present in these experiments (replacement
ony-forming units, the antibiotics differed in their effect on fecal of stxA by the KnR gene inactivates the toxin), no deaths were
Stx. Ciprofloxacin treatment resulted in an increase in fecal Stx observed in these experiments. As in the experiments with 1:
concentration in all 6 mice, whereas fosfomycin did not (figure 361R in mice, both ciprofloxacin and fosfomycin treatments
2). This increase in intraintestinal toxin production was accom- resulted in 100- to 1000-fold reductions in the number of donor
panied by a dramatic clinical effect. Four of the 6 ciprofloxacin- and recipient cells detected in fecal samples, compared with the
treated mice (those with the highest stool Stx concentrations) PBS-treated control group (both of these strains are sensitive
died, whereas none of the fosfomycin-treated mice nor control to the 2 antibiotics; table 2). However, significant numbers of
mice died. The mortality resulting from ciprofloxacin treatment transductants were detected in all 5 of the mice treated with
668 Zhang et al. JID 2000;181 (February)
Table 2. Ciprofloxacin enhances intraintestinal transduction of Kn-marked Shiga toxin (Stx) phage.
Ciprofloxacin treatment Fosfomycin treatment PBS treatment
Mouse Donor Recipient Transductant Donor Recipient Transductant Donor Recipient Transductant
1 4.0 3 105
8.0 3 105
1.1 3 104
9.2 3 105
2.8 3 104
UD 2.6 3 107
1.3 3 107
UD
Ciprofloxacin and other fluoroquinolones are the antibiotics be deleterious in patients, even if the organisms are subse-
most frequently prescribed for the treatment of diarrheal dis- quently killed by the antibiotic. These pharmacologic consid-
eases in adults. Such therapy is often empirical and prescribed erations suggest that it may be very difficult to determine a safe
before results of stool cultures are available. We found that dose of fluoroquinolones for the treatment of STEC infection.
ciprofloxacin treatment of mice colonized with E. coli O157: The cause of a diarrheal illness is usually not known when
H7 induced Stx prophages. The consequences of intestinal Stx patients first seek medical attention. Because STEC are asso-
prophage induction were enhanced intraintestinal Stx produc- ciated with ∼1% of stools submitted for analysis to clinical
tion, increased Stx phage transmission, and, most dramatically, microbiology laboratories in the United States [20], our data
death of the ciprofloxacin-treated mice. Because fosfomycin and suggest that empirical quinolone treatment of diarrheal disease
ciprofloxacin treatments both reduced intestinal 1:361R excre- or, indeed, therapy with any other antibiotic known to cause
tion similarly and because fosfomycin causes bacterial lysis (by bacteriophage induction, should be reconsidered. If antimicro-
inhibiting cell wall synthesis), the absence of augmented intes- bial treatment of STEC infection is indicated, classes of anti-
tinal toxin levels and death in the mice treated with fosfomycin biotics that do not induce Stx prophages (e.g., cell wall synthesis
indicates that the effects observed with ciprofloxacin cannot be inhibitors such as fosfomycin or protein synthesis inhibitors
attributed just to antibiotic-related bacterial cell lysis and re- such as macrolides) should be used. Similar caution should be
lease of preformed toxin. Thus, expanding the scope of our in
exercised in the choice of antimicrobial agents in the treatment
vitro observations, ciprofloxacin, but not fosfomycin, enhanced
of other infections, in which prophage-encoded toxins are crit-
intraintestinal Stx2 production in mice colonized with E. coli
ical virulence factors [30, 31]. Clearly, many patients infected
O157:H7. In this murine model, these ciprofloxacin-mediated
with STEC go on to develop HUS without having received
increases in intraintestinal toxin levels were sufficient to kill the
antibiotic therapy, so there must be other important factors
mice.
relating to the control of toxin expression or its absorption
These findings suggest that quinolones, as well as other an-
from the intestine. However, our observations do suggest that
tibiotics that can induce the bacterial SOS response with re-
caution should be exercised in relation to empirical treatment
sulting Stx prophage induction, should not be used as therapy
of diarrheal disease in both children and adults.
for STEC infection. Although the dose of ciprofloxacin that
Our data raise not only questions about the safety of the use
we administered to mice colonized with E. coli O157:H7 was
only 20% of the dose (on a milligram per kilogram of body of fluoroquinolones in the treatment of diarrheal disease for
weight basis) commonly given to patients with diarrhea, the individual patients but also broader issues regarding the role
concentrations of ciprofloxacin in intestinal microenvironments of antimicrobials in the dissemination of bacteriophage-en-
probably vary with the nature of intestinal contents, intestinal coded virulence factors in the environment. We found that Stx-
mucus, bacterial flora, epithelial cell secretions, and gut motility. encoding phages are able to move from 1 strain of E. coli to
When antibiotic therapy is initiated, concentrations required another in the intestines of mice and that antibiotic-mediated
for antibiotic-mediated Stx prophage and toxin induction may prophage induction enhances this process. It is possible that
be achieved in critical intestinal microenvironments well before the use of phage-inducing antimicrobials in farm animals, es-
bactericidal concentrations can accumulate. Our in vitro ex- pecially at subtherapeutic levels, may inadvertently enhance the
periments demonstrated that even a 3-h exposure to ciproflox- dissemination of bacteriophage-encoded toxins. This could con-
acin was enough to induce phage and elevate toxin expression. tribute to the emergence of new pathogens and the spread of
Thus, we speculate that the use of higher doses of ciprofloxacin Stx genes to other members of the Enterobacteriaceae family,
will, in the initial phase, cause an elevation of toxin that may such as Citrobacter and Enterobacter species, both of which
670 Zhang et al. JID 2000;181 (February)
have been associated with Shiga toxin–related HUS in humans and disease caused by enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Infect
Immun 1990; 58:2438–45.
[32, 33].
16. Karpman D, Connell H, Svensson M. The role of lipopolysaccharide and
Shiga-like toxin in a mouse model of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection.
Acknowledgments
J Infect Dis 1997; 175:611–20.