Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ebook download (eBook PDF) Company Law in Context: Text and Materials: Text and materials 2nd Edition all chapter
ebook download (eBook PDF) Company Law in Context: Text and Materials: Text and materials 2nd Edition all chapter
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-sealy-worthingtons-text-
cases-and-materials-in-company-law-11th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-land-law-text-cases-
materials-text-cases-and-materials-4th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-equity-trusts-text-
cases-materials-text-cases-and-materials-3rd-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-medical-law-text-cases-
and-materials-5th-edition/
(eBook PDF) EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials 7th
Edition
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-eu-law-text-cases-and-
materials-7th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-public-law-text-cases-
and-materials-4th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-contract-law-text-cases-
and-materials-9th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-criminal-law-text-cases-
and-materials-9th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-commercial-law-text-
cases-and-materials-4th-edition/
■ PREFACE
Students often view company law as something they have to do in order to get a job in
a corporate law firm, to be prepared for working in a corporate law firm, or indeed to
assure themselves that they do not want to work in a corporate law firm. The aspiration
of this book is to try and persuade more students that company law is not just a useful
discipline offering a high return on your intellectual capital investment, but that it is, on
its own terms, a fascinating and intellectually rich and challenging area of the law.
The challenge for any teacher of company law is to convey the excitement and enthu-
siasm that we have for our subject to you, to enable you to discover for yourself the
fascination and the intellectual stimulation available from something as apparently
immanently dry as company law. In my experience this discovery is not possible for
most students without access to the context in which the company and company law
operates: the economic and social context within which business activity takes place.
This book uses this context to facilitate an advanced understanding of corporate legal
concepts, structures, and regulatory choices.
This context is offered in four different ways in the book. First, the book deploys,
intermittently, a case study involving the ‘Bob’s Electronics business’: the development
of a business from idea, to sole trader, to incorporation, to public limited company.
The aim of the case study is to place the student in the shoes of the business actor; to
enable the student to empathize with the problems a business person faces in setting up
a business and the problems encountered as the company is formed and developed. The
context for students comes from the case study, but importantly the case study also aims
to encourage you to create your own context as you think about how you would behave
in the context described in the case study. Connected to this is a second tool deployed
in several chapters of the book to generate context. This is the use of specific assign-
ments for readers after the initial context has been provided but before the substantive
law has been engaged. Obviously, for many students short of time and with dates and
appointments to keep, it will be far too tempting to skip over the assignments and to
plough into the substance. If you can find the time and delay the appointment it would
be very beneficial for you to do the assignment; and even more beneficial to talk about
these assignments together with your fellow students. The idea of these assignments is
to enable you to think from first principles about possible regulatory solutions to the
introduced problem and to identify for yourself the policy reasons for and against the
identified solutions. These home-made solutions, and the reasons for and against them,
provide helpful background for when you engage with the actual legal rules. They enable
you to critically engage with the actual legal rules and are invaluable in building confi-
dence when you find that the solutions you create are very similar to the ones actually
deployed by UK company law. The third contextual tool is less context than analytical
framework: in Part II of the book we make use of a very simple economic framework—
the framework of agency problems—to organize the different legal mechanisms which
UK company law deploys to control management behaviour. Finally, the fourth element
of context is straightforward: where possible the book refers to real world examples—
real UK companies and their actual activities.
A further feature of the book, which is not a contextual tool but is used for similar
objectives as the above tools, is the use, particularly in Part II of the book on Corporate
Control and Accountability, of comparative company law. In particular, the book com-
pares UK company law with the company law of the US state of Delaware, which is
the most important state for company law in the United States. Why, one might ask,
viii PREFACE
do we need to learn about US company law before we have studied all of UK company
law? The reason for using these comparative materials is not that I want students of UK
company law to become experts in US company law; rather it is because I believe that
comparative law assists students—undergraduate and postgraduate alike—in under-
standing, as well as enjoying learning about, UK company law. The comparison enables
students to see that UK company law involves regulatory choices that are supported by
a set of policy justifications and that the UK could, as other jurisdictions do, make dif-
ferent regulatory choices that give different weight to alternative policy considerations.
This both facilitates a better understanding of UK company law and gives students
confidence to critically evaluate UK company law. This critical vantage point makes
learning and teaching company law much more fun. As this is the goal of the compara-
tive engagement it is used in the book to different extents in different areas of company
law. It is used when I think it makes a contribution to the above goals.
The book conceives of itself as an advanced undergraduate company text that
may also be used for postgraduate company law and corporate governance modules.
Unsurprisingly, this understanding of the book structures its form and content. The
book consists of the hard copy of the book and two additional chapters that are only
available online on the book’s web page (www.oxfordtextbooks.co.uk/orc/kershaw2e/).
The online chapters are chapters on Disclosure, Accounting, and Audit, and Issuing
Shares to the Public. The hard copy book chapters contain the subject areas which in my
view form the basis of a standard undergraduate company law course. The reason for
separating these two chapters is simply to ensure that the book is not too big and heavy
and that it can be read and carried manageably without injuring your back.
The first edition made the following acknowledgements and thank yous which I
would like to repeat with a couple of amendments for helpful contributions from friends
and colleagues.
The book is the product of two and half years of hard academic labour; many nights
at the computer after our three wonderful children, Jack, Lukas, and Megan, were put
to bed. During this time, as always, my wife, Marlies, supported, guided, and inspired
my work. I truly could not have done this, or for that matter much else, without her and
I am far more indebted and grateful to her than I think she knows.
There are lots of other people that I need to thank. Most importantly, my Mum and
Dad. My Mum, Alison, read every single word of this book not once but twice. She is
the first person who has read the book cover to cover twice and she may well be the last.
Her thoughts and guidance on the book, its structure, its contents, and its punctuation
were invaluable. Thank you Mum. My Dad, Bob, the inspiration for Bob’s Electronics,
didn’t read the book and who can blame him, but he was hugely supportive of this
project and he fixed our house whilst I was writing this book. Thanks Dad.
Finally, there are lots of family, friends, and colleagues who have made direct and
indirect contributions to this book. I could say you know who you are and thank
you, but writing a book is not a regular event and this is my first, so I won’t take
that option. I am enormously grateful, in alphabetical order, to the following people
for their comments and contributions to the content, style of, and ideas contained in
this book: Adele Barzelay, Erna Braun, Markus Braun, Sylvia Braun, Aaron Callen,
Matt Cowie, Suzanne Delrieu, Fabien Delrieu, Julio Faundez, David Kennedy, Duncan
Kennedy, Helen Kershaw, Ian Kershaw, Jane Kershaw, Joanne Lythe, Jim Lopez, Imre
Moller, Richard Moorhead, Ewan McGaughey, Ronalda Murphy, Ben Peacock, Mike
Thurlow, Sheila Tucker, and Edmund Schuster. Many thanks also to Paul Davies, Peter
Ramsay, and Charlie Webb for taking the time to talk to me about the book and giv-
ing me extremely helpful advice about several issues in the book, and to Demetra
Arsalidou, Tom Burns, David Cabrelli, Stuart Cross, Janice Denoncourt, Sandra Frisby,
Joanna Gray, Aled Griffiths, Rob Heywood, Paddy Ireland, Patrick Masiyakurima,
PREFACE ix
Marc Moore, Paul Omar, Harry Rajak, Chris Riley, Lee Roach, Ian Snaith, Mike
Varney, and Kevin Wardman for their constructive and thoughtful comments and for
their generosity for taking the time to carry out the reviews. Finally I am very grate-
ful to John Carroll, Francesca Griffin, Siân Jenkin, Gareth Malna, Jacqueline Senior,
Emma Wilson, and the OUP team for all their encouragement, ideas, and consummate
professionalism.
PowerPoint® slides
A suite of diagrams and charts in PowerPoint® has
been included, to aid your understanding of challenging
cases and concepts.
Video podcast
Meet the author as he introduces the book and sets the
804 glossary
scene for your studies.
Debenture A debenture is a secured without having to contribute to obtaining
promissory note issued by the debtor. A that benefit.
promissory note is simply a promise to FTSE 100 An index of the 100 largest
pay the amount specified in the note. companies in the UK (ranked by market
default term / rules A term that applies to capitalization according to the London
a contract unless the contracting parties Stock Exchange)
specify otherwise. FTSE 350 An index of the 350 largest
depreciation The decline in the value of an companies in the UK (ranked by market
asset as a result of the use of the asset in capitalization according to the London
the business. Stock Exchange
Due diligence The work carried out by a fund managers Investment professionals
party considering entering into a contract, who are instructed by investment funds,
sion funds, to manage the
nvestment fund
ting A duly convened meeting
ny’s shareholders. The term
h annual general meetings for
anies and all other meetings.
rn value Going concern
alue of a company on the
hat it will continue to be
ing concern rather than its
t assets being sold separately
ational Accounting Standards
ASB is responsible for
ernational Financial Reporting
a 50% chance of generating £200 has Standards (IFRSs)
an expected value of £175 (50%x150 + institutional investor The term institutional
50%x200). investor is used in the book to refer both
financial agency costs The agency costs that to savings and investment vehicles such
are incurred by company decisions that as pension funds and mutual funds and
enhance shareholder value at the expense insurance companies who invest the
of the value of the company’s debt insurance premiums paid to them.
fi nancial statements A company’s fi nancial instruction right The right of the
statements is an umbrella term used here shareholder in specific instances to tell
to refer to the company’s balance sheet the board what to do. For a company
and its profit and loss account or income with Model Articles by passing a special
statement. resolution to tell the board to take or
floating charge A type of security interest refrain from taking specific action.
available for a company (but not a IPO IPO stands for initial public offering
sole trader) which floats over all the (i.e., the fi rst public offering of shares) (see
business assets and only comes into effect further Web Chapter C).
(crystallizes) on the occurrence of certain junk bonds Formally speaking Bonds that
events such as the failure to pay back a are rated below the investment grade
loan. credit rating given to public bond issues
Fortune 500 An annual list published by by credit rating agencies such as Moody’s
Fortune magazine ranking the top 500 US and Standard & Poors. More generally this
companies means that there is more risk associated with
free ride A person who free rides is these bonds than investment grade bonds,
benefiting from someone else’s actions and, therefore, a greater likelihood default.
17 Shares 709
Web Chapter B—Issuing shares to the public
I Introduction 79
1 What is a constitution and does a company have one? 79
2 The constitutional documents 80
3 The Model Articles of Association 81
4 Amending the articles of association 83
II The legal status of the constitution: the corporate contract 85
III Enforcing the corporate contract 87
1 Qua member and only qua member? 87
2 Internal irregularities versus personal rights 89
IV Shareholders’ agreements 93
B The mechanics of the general meeting 96
I How do members act? 96
1 Resolutions 96
2 Shareholder meetings 97
3 Voting at general meetings 98
II Shareholder action through informal consent 100
I Introduction 105
II Capacity 106
III Contract and the company 109
1 Primary and general rules of attribution 109
2 The common law of agency: actual authority 112
3 The common law of agency: apparent authority (sometimes referred
to as ostensible authority) 115
4 The Companies Act 2006 and apparent authority 126
IV Tort and the company 133
1 Attributing tortious acts to the company 133
2 Directors as the embodiment of the company:
the identification doctrine 138
3 Liability of directors and officers for acts undertaken
on behalf of the company 140
4 Group liability in tort 147
V Crime and the company 155
1 Attributing crimes to companies: special rules of attribution 156
2 Corporate manslaughter 163
I Introduction 189
II Decision rights 189
1 Who should make corporate decisions? 189
2 The basic distribution of decision-making power in UK company law 191
3 Shareholder veto and approval rights 204
4 Changing the distribution of power 209
5 The formal distribution of power between the board and management 210
6 Decision rights in the US 212
7 Decision rights in German corporate law 216
III Appointment and removal 219
1 Appointment and removal rights in theory 219
2 Appointment and removal rights in UK company law 220
3 Removal rights in comparative perspective 228
IV Shareholder versus director primacy 230
I Introduction 279
1 The objectives of remuneration 279
2 The executive remuneration problem 280
II The types and trajectory of remuneration for executive directors 281
1 Types of executive pay and benefits 281
2 The structure and trajectory of executive pay for listed companies 284
xx Contents in full
III Legal strategies to ensure that pay is not a managerial agency cost 291
1 The regulation of conflicts of interest and executive directors’ pay 291
2 Remuneration committees 292
3 Disclosure and shareholder voice 294
4 Executive remuneration arrangements subject to shareholder approval 299
5 Has UK executive pay regulation been successful? 300
6 The future of executive remuneration regulation 303
IV Remuneration for service as a non-executive director 306
V Regulating executive remuneration across the Atlantic 309
I The pre-2006 Act common law duty to act in good faith in the
best interests of the company 335
1 What are the company’s interests at common law? 335
2 Evaluating directors’ actions 339
3 Judging with hindsight 345
4 Why is the standard for evaluating directors’ decisions so low? 346
5 Evaluating the failure to consider the company’s interests 348
6 Restricting discretion in the best interests of the company 351
II Rethinking what is in the company’s interests 357
1 The interests of the company’s ‘owners’ 357
2 Contract and company interests 362
3 Justifying state regulation of company interests: trusteeship and
social responsibility 366
4 Justifying regulation: could multiple interest trusteeship
increase the size of the economic pie? 376
5 The UK reform debate on the company’s interests 378
III The Companies Act 2006 381
1 The duty to promote the success of the company 381
2 The duty to exercise independent judgment 385
11 Regulating discretion II: using corporate powers for proper purposes 387
I Introduction 410
1 Directors’ decision-making activity and function 410
2 What does taking care involve in a company context? 411
3 The structure and design of a duty of care 417
II The duty of care at common law 419
1 The common law position prior to the 1990s 419
2 The evolution of the common law position in the 1990s 429
3 Monitoring and reliance on management and employees 433
III The duty of care and the Companies Act 2006 447
IV Indemnifying directors for breach of duty 450
1 Company waivers, indemnities, and insurance 450
2 Court discretion to grant liability relief 452
V The duty of care in US comparative perspective 455
1 The standard of care 455
2 The standard of review for business decisions 456
3 The standard of review in relation to the decision-making process 457
4 The standard of review and board monitoring 470
VI Does the UK have a business judgment rule? 473
I Introduction 476
II Strategies for regulating self-dealing 476
1 Introduction 476
2 Regulatory strategies 477
III Self-dealing and the common law: the duty of loyalty 481
1 The common law 481
2 Opting out of shareholder approval and Table A 489
IV Self-dealing regulation under the Companies Act 2006 491
1 Ex-ante board disclosure 491
2 Mandatory ex-post disclosure 496
3 Shareholder approval and substantial property transactions 498
4 Loans to directors 503
V Self-dealing regulation beyond the Companies Act 504
1 Additional self-dealing regulation for listed companies 504
2 Ex-post disclosure and accounting regulation 505
VI UK self-dealing regulation in comparative US perspective 508
I Introduction 514
1 An opportunities hypothetical 514
xxii Contents in full
2 Strictness versus flexibility/deterrence versus fairness 518
II Opportunities and the common law 519
1 Regal (Hastings) v Gulliver 519
2 Boardman v Phipps 525
3 The no-conflicts approach and the company’s interests 539
4 Approval mechanisms at common law 560
5 Resignation of office in order to take the opportunity 561
III The Companies Act 2006 569
1 Section 175(1) 570
2 Section 175(2) 571
3 Section 175(4)(a) 572
4 Approval mechanisms under the 2006 Act 573
5 The status of the no-profit rule 574
6 Former directors 574
IV Directors competing with the company and holding
directorships in competing companies 575
V Strictness versus flexibility in US comparative perspective 579
VI Summary 587
I Introduction 589
1 Only the company can enforce rights owed to the company 589
2 Which corporate body should make the decision to
commence litigation against a director? 589
3 Choosing between the regulatory options 594
II Control of the litigation decision by the board or the general meeting 595
III The common law’s regulation of derivative actions 601
IV Derivative actions under the Companies Act 2006 606
1 The new statutory derivative action mechanism 606
2 Structure and ground rules of the derivative claim 609
3 Permission to continue the derivative claim 611
4 Turning company-initiated litigation into derivative litigation 628
V Multiple derivative claims 629
VI Funding derivative claims 631
1 The relationship between legal cost rules and the effectiveness
of the derivative claim 631
2 Costs rules in derivative claims 633
VII Reflective loss: enforcing the priority of the company’s claim 639
1 Introduction 639
2 The reflective loss principle 640
I Introduction 646
1 The controlling shareholder agency problem 646
Contents in full xxiii
2 Regulating controlling shareholder actions 649
II Common law regulation of controlling shareholders 651
1 Common law limits on shareholder voting 651
2 Regulation of controlling shareholder activities where they
do not exercise corporate power 667
III Statutory regulation of controlling shareholder power 672
1 Just and equitable winding-up 673
2 The unfair prejudice remedy 679
IV The unfair prejudice remedy beyond the equitable
considerations category 690
1 The move towards independent illegality 690
2 Testing the boundaries of the independent illegality requirement 692
V The remedies available through an unfair prejudice petition 696
1 The available remedies 696
2 Encouraging out-of-court settlements: buy-out offers
and unfair prejudice 698
3 Corporate remedies for breach of duty: the unfair prejudice
remedy as a ‘derivative action’ 700
VI Listed company-related party transactions 703
VII Minority shareholder protection beyond this chapter 705
17 Shares 709
I Introduction 709
1 Shares as financial contractual claims 709
2 Shares and control rights 712
3 Choice of finance: equity versus debt; ordinary
shares versus preferred shares 715
II Issuing shares 716
1 Who should make the decision to issue shares? 716
2 The regulation of share issues in UK company law 718
III Class rights 734
1 Variation of class rights 734
2 What rights are class rights? 737
3 Variation in rights versus detriment to class interests? 740
4 Protecting minority class shareholders 741
IV Share buy-backs 742
1 Why would a company repurchase its own shares? 742
2 Regulation of share buy-backs at common law 746
3 Regulation of share buy-backs pursuant to
the Companies Act 2006 748
V Financial assistance 752
1 Introduction 752
2 The prohibition on the provision of financial assistance 754
xxiv Contents in full
I Introduction 771
II Problems generated by limited liability 772
1 Transferring risk from members to creditors 772
2 Limited liability and the opportunistic transfers of wealth
from creditors to shareholders 774
3 Limited liability and incentive to invest in hazardous activities 776
III Reconsidering unlimited liability for tort victims 781
IV Creditor-regarding obligations 787
1 Introduction 787
2 Directors’ duties and creditor protection 788
3 Fraudulent trading 794
4 Wrongful trading 795
V Directors’ disqualification 806
I Introduction 812
II Minimum capital requirements 814
1 Do minimum capital requirements protect creditors? 814
2 UK and European approaches to minimum capital 817
III Distributions 818
1 Approaches to distribution regulation 818
2 UK distribution regulation prior to 1980 821
3 Distribution regulation under the Companies Act 2006 829
4 Creditor protection through post-1980 distribution regulation 833
5 Reforming the distribution rules 838
6 Distributable profits and share buy-backs and redemptions 845
7 Liability for unlawful distributions 846
IV Reducing capital 856
1 Court confirmation capital reduction procedure 857
2 Solvency statement and the board approval strategy 860
3 Classes of shares and capital reductions 868
4 Will private companies continue to use the court-confirmation
procedure or the share-repurchase procedure? 869
V Structuring around capital and distribution regulation 869
1 Legal engineering 869
2 Substance over form in distribution regulation 870
Index 877
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
us. When a child is compelled to do a piece of school work without
realizing the significance of that which he does, there is substituted
for this realization of need or problem an artificial need; namely, to
avoid an unpleasant consequence.
There is another important argument which must not be
overlooked. When a child works under compulsion, he usually gives
just as little attention to his work as may be necessary to escape
painful results. It is not uncommon for children to divide their
attention most skillfully between distasteful school tasks and the out-
of-school activities in which they are vitally interested. This lack of
undivided attention to the work in hand results in a habit of work
which cannot fail to be disastrous to the highest intellectual
attainment. It is true also that children who have been subjected to
such treatment come to look upon books and lessons as something
of a nightmare, and are only too glad when the opportunity presents
itself to leave school and go to work. The child’s attitude, growing out
of his school experience, is quite as important as any result which
we may achieve in knowledge.
Professor Dewey’s summary of the relation of interest and effort
defines most adequately interest in its true significance, and
indicates the place of effort in educative process. He says:—
“Genuine interest in education is the accompaniment of the
identification, through action, of the self with some object or idea,
because of the necessity of that object or idea for the maintenance
of self-expression. Effort, in the sense in which it may be opposed to
interest, implies a separation between the self and the fact to be
mastered or the task to be performed, and sets up an habitual
division of activities. Externally, we have mechanical habits with no
psychical end or value. Internally, we have random energy or mind-
wandering, a sequence of ideas with no end at all because not
brought to a focus in action. Interest, in the sense in which it is
opposed to effort, means simply an excitation of the sense organ to
give pleasure, resulting in strain on one side and listlessness on the
other.
“But when we recognize there are certain powers within the child
urgent for development, needing to be acted upon, in order to secure
their own due efficiency and discipline, we have a firm basis upon
which to build. Effort arises normally in the attempt to give full
operation, and thus growth and completion, to these powers.
Adequately to act upon these impulses involves seriousness,
absorption, definiteness of purpose, and results in formation of
steadiness and persistent habit in the service of worthy ends. But
this effort never degenerates into drudgery, nor mere strain of dead
lift, because interest abides—the self is concerned throughout.”[3]
Interest, as Professor Dewey defines it, is intrinsic. The pupil does
his work not because he hopes to escape some punishment or get a
high mark, but because the work of itself commands his attention.
The teacher must constantly choose whether she will work for
interest of this type, which depends upon the recognition of the worth
of the task to be performed, or resort to an interest which has no
relation to the work to be done. Shall she appeal to the child through
his instinctive delight in finding out, in constructive work, or other
form of expression, or shall she appeal to his instinct of fear of a
whipping or dislike of ridicule or nagging?
It is true that, after the teacher has done her best to appeal on the
basis of the child’s needs for growth and development, not all
children will respond equally, and so, as in the larger society outside
of school, the child will need to be kept from interfering with others,
and required to do that which those who are wiser have decided that
it is advantageous for him to do. But this resort to authority, an
acknowledgment of lack of ability on our part or the result of
unfavorable conditions, must come last; it should never be the point
of departure.
There is one other distinction which it is well to keep in mind when
we think of interest. Our discussion thus far has considered interest
as a means for securing certain desirable ends. We may not forget
that to secure interest which will persist in many of the types of
activity found in the school should be considered as an end worthy in
itself.[4] We may hope to have a boy interested in his history lesson
in order that he may gain the knowledge contained in this subject.
Interest is the means we employ to secure the desired result. On the
other hand, we may hope that the boy we teach will continue to be
interested in history throughout his life. In this latter case the interest
which we hope to secure in history becomes an end for which we
work. As a result of any system of education, we are justified in
expecting, not only an increase in the command of facts and in a
knowledge of the best method of procedure in working in subjects
taught, but also in hoping for the development of lasting interests
which will make for a continuance of the period of education and for
greater joy in life.
Heredity in Education: An inquiry into opposing theories of heredity
is not relevant to our main purpose; but we are concerned with
certain facts, commonly accepted, which condition our work. No one
will dispute the fact that the children assembled in any schoolroom
differ in native capacity, as well as in experience. Whether genius or
its lack are apt to be reproduced in the children of gifted or dull
parents is not the question the teacher has to solve. For her the
demand is too often that she turn out a uniform product from a group
of individuals who range from the genius to the dullard or mental
defective. It is well for teachers to realize that in any non-selected
group the majority of individuals may be expected to be of ordinary
ability, and that a few will range above this standard, and a few will
fall below. The important thing to remember is that a group of normal
children cannot be ranged in ability in two or three distinct groups
with clearly defined boundaries, but that if any adequate test be
given, we will find that they distribute themselves over a wide range,
with small rather than large differences between individuals. For
example: if a searching test in fundamental operations of arithmetic
is given, we know that some child will probably get nearly all of the
work done correctly, and, even with our care in grading, some child
in the group will probably fail in more than half of the work; and that
between these two extremes we will have almost every grade of
ability represented, with a tendency for a considerable number to
group themselves at about that point which we consider ordinary or
average ability.[5] Not only is it true that individuals differ in ability of
any particular sort, but it is also true that the child who has little
ability in one direction may be up to the average or have more than
usual ability in some other direction. In our teaching we should have
a minimum standard of efficiency for all who are not mentally
defective, and we should strive earnestly to have all reach this goal.
If wisely selected, this minimum will include that which is absolutely
necessary for further advancement along the line of work pursued.
The majority of the class should achieve results beyond this
minimum, and for the exceptionally bright child the maximum should
be fixed only by the child’s ability and the requirements of good
health. It is useless to attempt to make all alike; it is wrong to limit
the accomplishment of the gifted by the capacity of the majority;
these are the lessons which the consideration of the capacities of
any group of children should teach. We cannot furnish ability, but we
may create an attitude of listlessness and mental laziness, if we do
not give the bright child enough to do. Education demands a
recognition of peculiar abilities and their nurture. We can never
create genius from mediocre ability, and we may not assume that
genius is irrepressible.
Exercises.
1. What institutions contribute to the education of children?
2. Why has the responsibility of the school increased during the past century?
3. How would you justify compulsory education? Medical examination?
Compulsory dental treatment?
4. Why do changed social conditions demand changed methods of instruction as
well as a different curriculum?
5. Why does the teacher need to know the home life of the children in her class?
6. What is the significance of parents’ and mothers’ clubs, or any other
organization of the teachers and the patrons of the school?
7. Why should teachers participate in the campaign against tuberculosis?
8. Give instances from your own experience of the educative value of play.
9. Why can a boy write a better composition about making a kite than on
“Honesty is the best policy”?
10. What is the objection to providing children with model compositions and
asking them to write on closely related themes?
11. Give examples of a proper appeal to the instinct of emulation.
12. How do you account for the fact that in some classes children seldom ask
questions?
13. What value is there in a collection of birds’ nests, flowers, minerals, woods,
and the like, which one finds in some schoolrooms?
14. How would you hope to develop the social instinct in the pupils you teach?
15. Give the children in your class ten problems in addition, score one for each
column added correctly, and compare the results. Can a teacher create ability?
16. In a city school system forty per cent of the children have been retarded one
or more years during their school life. Do you think that differences in ability justify
the repeating of work one or more years by so large a percentage of the children?
17. Should we try to have children develop equal ability in all of their studies, or
rather encourage them to do especially well in one or two subjects?
18. Should a pupil who receives only forty per cent in his arithmetic examination
be compelled to repeat the grade?
19. State the argument of those who believe that disagreeable, uninteresting
work is most valuable in educating children.
20. What reasons can you give for the demand that teachers secure the interest
of their pupils in school work?
21. Why is it bad intellectually for a child to divide his interest between his school
work and some other activity while doing school work?
22. There is always some motive present when work is accomplished in the
school. If the pupil is not interested in his work, what motives will you be apt to find
in operation?
23. Does the demand that children take an interest in their work mean that we
will require them to do only the sort of work which is easy for them?
24. Name three situations in school work in which you would seek to use interest
as a means. Three cases in which you would consider interests as ends.
25. In which situation will a boy write the better letter: when asked to write a
letter as a class exercise, or when he writes to his uncle about their plans for his
summer vacation?
26. The ends which we desire to attain may be relatively near or remote.
Classify the following aims presented to children according to (1) the remoteness
of the end to be achieved, (2) the interest which you would expect children to take
in the work for which these aims are supposed to furnish some motive. Suppose
the class to be a seventh-grade group of boys.
1. Learn how to build a boat.
2. Become a writer of good English.
3. Gain in skill in the process of dovetailing.
4. Write for a catalog of sets of tools for boys.
5. Find out why England maintains the largest navy in the world.
6. Prepare a description of the building of the Panama Canal.
7. Decide why so many Russians come to the United States.
8. Make the drawings for a sled to be built for his own use.
9. Make a rabbit trap from plans furnished by the teacher.
10. Study algebra to get ready to go to college.
11. Write a story of an interclass basket-ball game for the school paper.
12. Enjoy one of Kipling’s stories.
CHAPTER III
Exercises.
1. When a teacher raps her pencil against a desk and the children look toward
her, what is the type of adjustment made? When will they cease to pay attention to
the rap of the pencil? What suggestion would you offer concerning the danger
which may be found in rapping the pencil against the desk, ringing a bell, clapping
the hands, shouting “be quiet”?
2. Name some exercises in arithmetic in which you may depend somewhat upon
instinctive adjustments to insure progress.
3. Where do you think you will find the most instinctive adjustments,—in
geography, arithmetic, drawing, English composition, or physical training?
4. A boy who had done poor work in algebra improved greatly when changed
from a class taught by a man to one taught by a woman. How would you account
for the change, taking it for granted that the teachers were equally competent?
What type of adjustment did the boy make?
5. Why is it that any new subject will prove attractive for a short time, and
children will later show a lack of interest in the work?
6. Is there any difference between making a class period interesting and finding
a motive which appeals to children which will lead them to desire to cover the
material which you have assigned?
7. Which is the better, to have a girl study her geography lesson to please the
teacher or to have her at work trying to solve a problem in which she is interested?
8. What sort of results do teachers secure who compel children to learn their
lessons through fear of being ridiculed or otherwise punished? If these children
know as much as other children whose teacher has them at work satisfying their
idea of pleasure,—which will result in being able to read well to the class, prepare
their part of the class drama, or investigate in fields in which they are much
interested,—would you, then, consider the first sort of teaching as satisfactory as
the second?
9. To what degree can you depend upon the awakening of intellectual interests
to provide a motive for good work on the part of pupils?
10. Do you think the following list of questions would prove intellectually
stimulating to a group of sixth-grade pupils:—
“Where is Philadelphia? What is the capital of New York? What are the principal
rivers of the Middle Atlantic states? Where is Pittsburgh? For what is Pittsburgh
noted? What river forms the eastern boundary of Pennsylvania? Bound Virginia.
Locate the capitals of the states in this group. Name two valuable products raised
near the coast. Describe the surface of this group of states.”
11. How many children in your class find satisfaction in their school work
sufficient to keep them at it if no marks were given and no one compelled them to
attend school? Are there some subjects or parts of subjects where you secure this
sort of enthusiasm for school work? Why do you succeed better in these phases of
school work than in others?
12. What is wrong with the boy who is quiet during the recitation, apparently
absorbed in the work, but who gets nothing out of it?
13. Why does the teacher who speaks in a loud tone of voice in order to compel
attention have to speak louder and louder as the day advances?
14. What is wrong with a class which does good work in long division at the
beginning of the arithmetic period, and very poor work at the end of thirty minutes?
15. Give examples of passive attention, active attention, and secondary passive
attention, from your own classroom work.
16. Describe the situations in which you believe your children did the best
intellectual work. How do you account for the excellence of this work?
CHAPTER IV