Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ebook download (Original PDF) Psychological Testing and Assessment 2e 2nd Edition all chapter
ebook download (Original PDF) Psychological Testing and Assessment 2e 2nd Edition all chapter
http://ebooksecure.com/product/psychological-testing-and-
assessment-9th-edition-by-ronald-jay-cohen/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-psychological-testing-
and-assessment-3rd-edition-by-shum-david/
https://ebooksecure.com/download/psychological-testing-and-
assessment-an-introduction-to-tests-and-measurement-ebook-pdf/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-psychological-testing-
principles-applications-and-issues-9th-edition/
Psychological Testing: Principles, Applications, and
Issues 9th Edition Robert M. Kaplan - eBook PDF
https://ebooksecure.com/download/psychological-testing-
principles-applications-and-issues-ebook-pdf/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/essentials-of-wisc-v-assessment-
essentials-of-psychological-assessment-1st-edition-ebook-pdf/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-essentials-of-mmpi-a-
assessment-essentials-of-psychological-assessment-book-23/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-computer-security-and-
penetration-testing-2nd-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-psychological-discovery-
readings-custom-2nd-edition/
Psychological
testing and
assessment
Second Edition
David Shum
John O’Gorman
Brett Myors
Peter Creed
vi Contents
1 Glossary326
1 References338
1 Index368
Figures and Tables
List of Figures
Figure 1.1 Imperial examination in China 6
Figure 1.2 Group testing of American army recruits during the First World War 7
Figure 1.3 Drawing of migrants embarking from a ship, circa 1885 11
Figure 1.4 Sample passages of the dictation test used in 1925 12
Figure 2.1 Relationship between psychological assessment and psychological testing 22
Figure 2.2 Psychological testing: self-report versus performance 23
Figure 3.1 Plotting the raw scores in our example with the transformed scores 48
Figure 3.2 Percentage of cases below z of +1 in a normal distribution 51
Figure 3.3 Relationships among linear and nonlinear raw score transformations 66
Figure 6.1 Steps in test construction 122
Figure 6.2 Types of measurement 125
Figure 6.3 Empirical trace lines for two items from a (fictitious)
test of general mental ability 127
Figure 6.4 Possible measurement models 128
Figure 6.5 Three parameters of a trace line 130
Figure 6.6 Examples of curves with different parameters 130
Figure 6.7 Examples of item formats 133
Figure 7.1 Alfred Binet (1857–1911) 149
Figure 7.2 Charles Spearman (1863–1945) 150
Figure 7.3 Spearman’s theory of ‘g’ and ‘s’ 151
Figure 7.4 Lewis Terman (1857–1956) 151
Figure 7.5 David Wechsler (1896–1981) 152
Figure 7.6 Louis Thurstone (1887–1955) 154
Figure 7.7 Thurstone’s model of primary mental abilities 154
Figure 7.8 JP Guildford (1897–1987) 154
Figure 7.9 Guilford’s model of intelligence 155
x
Figures and Tables xi
List of Tables
Table 2.1 Name, address, and website of major test suppliers in Australia 25
Table 2.2 User levels used by Psychological Corporation, Australia and New Zealand
in supplying test materials 26
Table 2.3 General principles and ethical standards of the Australian
Psychological Society 35
Table 3.1 Calculating z scores from raw scores 50
Table 3.2 Area under the standard normal distribution 52
Table 3.3 Equal differences in z scores do not mean equal differences in percentiles 65
Table 3.4 Percentile ranges corresponding to stanine scores 66
xii Figures and Tables
Table 3.5 Bartram and Lindley’s recommendations for sample sizes for purposes of
test norming72
Table 3.6 Some examples of sampling methods and sample sizes for widely used
psychological tests 72
Table 4.1 Calculating Cronbach’s alpha for a five-item test 82
Table 4.2 Calculating Cronbach’s alpha for another five-item test 83
Table 6.1 Comparison of CTT and IRT statistics for item analysis 136
Table 6.2 Fictitious item data for a five-item test each with four options
administered to ten individuals 137
Table 6.3 Corrected and uncorrected item-total correlations for the data in Table 6.2 138
Table 7.1 Broad (Stratum II) abilities assessed by the Stanford-Binet and Wechsler
Adult Intelligence Scale 162
Table 8.1 The Five-Factor Model (FFM) 184
Table 8.2 The person variables identified by Walter Mischel 189
Table 8.3 Concepts and methods in personality assessment based on McAdams’
possible levels of knowing another person 193
Table 9.1 Subtests of the WAIS–IV 206
Table 9.2 Reliability of the WAIS–IV 208
Table 9.3 Sample items of the DASS 215
Table 10.1 Some performance indicators 225
Table 10.2 A behaviourally anchored rating scale for the role of customer
service operator 228
Table 10.3 Some examples of the behavioural observation scale 229
Table 10.4 Typical speed and accuracy test items 240
Table 11.1 Subtests of the WMS–IV 258
Table 11.2 Descriptions of tasks and functions measured by the nine subtests of
the D-KEFS 262
Table 12.1 Differences between forensic and therapeutic assessment 271
Table 12.2 Examples of commonly used risk assessment tools 275
Table 13.1 Subtests of the WISC–IV 289
Table 13.2 Reliability of the WISC–IV 291
Table 13.3 Reliability of standard progressive matrices: Australian edition 293
Table 13.4 WIAT–II composites and subtests 295
Table 13.5 Reliability of the WIAT–II 296
Preface
We were greatly encouraged by the positive response to the first edition of Psychological Testing and
Assessment and pleased when the publisher invited us to prepare a second edition. This gave us the
opportunity to update the work, to expand on areas that deserved a fuller treatment than we had
provided in the first edition and to take into consideration the feedback provided by colleagues and
readers. Given the dynamic and evolving nature of the field of psychological testing and assessment,
we believe that it is important and useful to regularly update the content and discussion.
In this second edition we have added two new chapters—one on intelligence and one on
personality—to provide a broader background to two substantive areas of research and theory that
are essential to psychological testing and assessment. We have expanded the coverage of cultural
differences and included a new section on factor analysis. The former is important because most
of the countries where the book will be read include people from many cultural backgrounds and
these differences influence the choice, administration and interpretation of tests and other assessment
devices. Factor analysis continues to be a major tool used by test developers in constructing and
analysing psychological tests, and some familiarity with it is necessary to make sense of the judgments
that are made about the validity of tests for particular purposes.
As well as adding new material, we have expanded the treatment of some of the topics covered
in the previous edition. In the chapter on test construction, for example, we have expanded the
discussion of item response theory (IRT) that is increasingly being used by test developers, and
have added to the section on item writing by outlining the salient principles followed in this
critical aspect of test construction. We also have extended the material included in the applied
chapters. For example, the testing in organisations chapter now includes a section on assessing work
attitudes covering job satisfaction, organisational commitment and perceptions of organisational
justice. The educational testing chapter now includes sections on the international (PISA) and
Australia-wide testing (NAPLAN) of school children, and what teachers need to know about
assessment procedures. Because new editions of some psychological tests have been published since
our last edition, we have also updated the description of these tests and for some areas we have
included new tests that were not in the first edition.
In this second edition, we have also included a number of new features to enhance learning and
understanding. These include a list of learning objectives at the beginning of each chapter, a list of
glossary terms at the end of the book and five practitioner profiles for each of the five professional
chapters.
xiii
xiv Preface
We trust these changes have added to the value of the book as an introduction to the art and
science of psychological testing and assessment, without limiting its accessibility to a wide audience
of students. Some subject areas are more difficult than others, but in writing this book we want
students to be aware of all the issues that bear on the use of tests and the formulation of assessments.
Many topics require a fuller treatment for their mastery than is possible in an introductory text
and we encourage students to seek that fuller treatment to expand their overview of the field. The
references, additional readings and websites included at the end of each chapter will assist students
in this task.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank all the staff at Oxford University Press involved in the preparation of
this second edition for their assistance, which has materially improved our contribution.
In particular, we would like to thank the copyeditor, Pete Cruttenden. We thank Allana Canty,
James Ogilvie and Mitchell Shepherd for helping us with researching and preparing materials for
this new edition. Many thanks also go to the following contributors for sharing their practitioner
profiles in Part 4: Professor Amanda Gordon, Dr Elizabeth Allworth, Dr Jan Ewing, Dr Danielle
Schumack and Associate Professor Tim Hannan.
The author and the publisher wish to thank the following copyright holders for reproduction
of their material.
Figure 1.2: Getty Images/Time & Life Pictures; Figure 2.2: Shutterstock.com; David Weschler:
U.S. National Library of Medicine; B026174. Courtesy Light, LLC; Raymond Cattell: Cattell
Family; Louis Thurstone: Courtesy National Academy of Sciences; JP Guilford: University of
Southern California; Philip Vernon: Courtesy Pioneerfund.org. Every effort has been made to trace
the original source of copyright material contained in this book. The publisher will be pleased to
hear from copyright holders to rectify any errors or omissions.
xv
xvi
The Context of
Psychological Testing
and Assessment
Part 1
Psychological Tests:
What Are They and Why
Do We Need Them?
Key terms
criterion-referenced test
1
norm-referenced test
objective procedure
psychological test
psychometric properties
test obsolescence
Chapter objectives
By the end of this chapter you should be able to:
1 explain how psychological tests have developed over time
2 define what a psychological test is and explain its defining
characteristics
3 explain how psychological tests are better than other means used to
assist people to understand behaviour and to make decisions
4 explain the advantages and limitations of psychological tests.
3
4 PART 1 The Context of Psychological Testing and Assessment
Introduction
The development and application of psychological tests is considered one of the major
achievements of psychologists in the last century (Zimbardo, 2004).The news items above illustrate
some of the ways psychological tests have been applied in our societies. For the most part, tests are
used to assist in making decisions or promoting self-understanding by providing more accurate
information about human behaviour than is available without them. Psychological tests are also
important tools for conducting psychological research. In this book our focus is on the former
rather than the latter application.
The ability to select, administer, score and interpret psychological tests is considered a core skill for
professional psychologists (Australian Psychology Accreditation Council, 2010).Thus, the teaching of
this ability is usually included as one or more courses for undergraduate and postgraduate psychology
programs in Australia and other countries. Who developed the first psychological test and how has
psychological testing progressed through time? What are the advantages of using psychological tests
to promote understanding and to assist decision-making processes about people in our society?
What are psychological tests and what are their defining characteristics? What are the advantages and
limitations of psychological tests? These are the topics of the first chapter of this book.
Box 1.1
Timeline of major developments in the history of psychological testing
1890 The term ‘mental test’ is first used by James McKeen Cattell
1905 Alfred Binet and Theodore Simon devise the first test of intelligence for use with children
1916 Lewis Terman publishes the Stanford-Binet test, based on the pioneering work of Binet and Simon
1917 Robert Yerkes leads the development of the Army Alpha and Beta tests for selection for military
service in the USA
Chapter 1 Psychological Tests 5
The origins of psychological testing can be found in the public service examinations used
by Chinese dynasties to select those who would work for them. These were large-scale exercises
involving many applicants and several days of testing, and from the era of the Han dynasty involved
written examinations (Bowman, 1989). Programs of testing were conducted from about 2000 bce
to the early years of the twentieth century when they were discontinued, at about the time the
modern era of psychological testing was being introduced in the USA. A major impetus to this
modern development of testing was the need to select men for military service when the USA
entered the First World War without a standing army. There were, however, a number of precursors
to this development, the most significant being the work of Alfred Binet (1857–1911) and his
colleagues in France in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
Binet was asked by the Office of Public Instruction in Paris to provide a method for objectively
determining which children would benefit from special education. In responding to this request,
Binet devised the first of the modern intelligence tests, using problems not unlike those covered in
6 PART 1 The Context of Psychological Testing and Assessment
a normal school program. In the process, he proposed a method for quantifying intelligence in terms
of the concept of mental age; that is, the child’s standing among children of different chronological
ages in terms of his or her cognitive capacity. For example, a child whose knowledge and problem-
solving ability was similar to that of the average 10 year old was described as having a mental age
of 10 years. The child’s chronological age may be in advance or behind that. Binet showed how
a test of intelligence might be validated by comparing the test performance of older with younger
children, or the performance of those considered bright by their teachers with those considered
dull. Given our understanding of ability, older children should do better than younger children
on a test purporting to be a test of intelligence, and bright children should perform better than
dull children. Determining the appropriate content, finding a unit of measurement and specifying
methods for validating tests of this sort were all significant achievements, with the result that Binet is
often thought of as the originator of psychological testing. Binet himself may not have been entirely
pleased with this honour, because he was more concerned with the remediation of difficulties than
with the classification process that has preoccupied many who adopted his procedures.
The assumption implicit in Binet’s work—that performance on a range of apparently different
problems can be aggregated to yield an overall estimate of, in his terms, mental age—was examined
by Charles Spearman (1863–1945) in the UK in a series of investigations that yielded the first
theory of intelligence. This theory proposed that there was something common to all tests of
cognitive abilities: g in Spearman’s terms. This proposal was to be sharply criticised by a number of
American researchers, chief among them Thurstone.
The theoretical arguments did not deter a number of researchers from adapting Binet’s test
to the cultural milieu in which they worked. Henry Goddard (1866–1957) in the USA, Cyril
Burt (1883–1971) in the UK and Gilbert Phillips (1900–1975) in Australia all developed versions
of Binet’s test, but it was Lewis Terman (1877–1956) at Stanford University who published the
most ambitious version for use with English speakers. His test was appropriate for children aged
Chapter 1 Psychological Tests 7
from 3 years to 16 years. It was Terman’s version, which he termed the Stanford-Binet, that was to
dominate as a test of intelligence for individuals until David Wechsler (1896–1981) published a test
for the individual assessment of adult intelligence in 1948.
Binet’s test and the adaptations of it depended heavily on tapping skills that were taught in
school, which importantly included verbal skills. A number of researchers saw the need for practical
or performance tests of ability that did not depend on verbal skills or exposure to mainstream
formal schooling. One of the earliest of these researchers was Stanley Porteus (1883–1972), who in
1915 reported the use of mazes for assessing comprehension and foresight. Porteus was born and
educated in Australia, but spent most of his working life in the USA, first at the Vineland Institute
in New Jersey and then at the University of Hawaii. He returned to Australia from time to time to
study the abilities of Aboriginal Australians. His test required the test taker to trace with a pencil
increasingly complex mazes while avoiding dead ends and not lifting the pencil from the paper.
The test is still used by neuropsychologists in assessing executive functions. Porteus’s work was the
forerunner of the development in Australia of a number of tests of ability that are not dependent on
access to English for their administration, the most notable of which was the Queensland Test by
Donald McElwain (1915–2000) and George Kearney (1939–). The administrator of this test used
mime to indicate task requirements. In New Zealand, tests of cognitive ability for Maori children
were undertaken by St George (see Ord, 1977).
Binet’s test and its adaptations, and the early performance tests were individual tests of ability in
that they required administration to one person at a time. An individual test of intelligence was of little
use when thousands of individuals had to be tested in a short space of time-the situation in the First
World War. Arthur Otis (1886–1964) in the USA and Cyril Burt in England trialled a variety of group
tests of intelligence, but the most convincing demonstration of their usefulness was to come from
Clarence Yoakum (1879–1945) and Robert Yerkes (1876–1956) and their colleagues, who developed
two group tests of general mental ability for use with recruits to the US armed services during the
Figure 1.2 Group testing of American army recruits during the First World War
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
The Project Gutenberg eBook of Inconstancy
This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States
and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
ebook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where
you are located before using this eBook.
Title: Inconstancy
Language: English
By ROGER DEE
Illustrated by SUMMERS
The girl was small and slender, well under Mirrh Yahn y Cona's
athletic six-foot height. She was warmly and roundly vital with a
stunning abundance of life at which the two-dimensional simulacra of
recorded soap-opera could only hint.
"Miss Leila Anderson," Ellis introduced her. "Member of Diplomatic,
so it's all in the family."
She took the hand that Mirrh Yahn y Cona raised as if to defend
himself.
"I'm to see that you aren't bored to death here among strangers," she
said. "All work and no play isn't good for anyone. Especially," she said
to Ellis, "for one so handsome. I didn't dream he'd look so—"
"So Terran," Ellis finished before she could say so human. "And why
not? We're from the same original stock, separated ages before our
history begins. Martian annals run back for millennia, did you know?
Gold mine of information, settle problems our experts have puzzled
over for centuries."
"I am not truly representative of my people," Mirrh Yahn y Cona said
with some bitterness. "A special case, reared from birth for this
assignment."
The multisensory projector swung into the Tchulkione Serafi's Song of
Parting. Mirrh Yahn y Cona's resonant baritone, operatically assertive
above Yrml's reedy soprano, filled the room. He shut off the machine
abruptly, feeling a sense of desecration that the tender scene had
been bared to alien eyes.
Still he felt a puzzling premonitory twinge of guilt when the projection
collapsed. Yrml had been infinitely desirable when the sequence was
cubed; why should she now seem so sallow and angular, so suddenly
and subtly distant?
"Remarkable voice," Ellis said. "You could make a fortune with it
here."
"It was lovely," Leila Anderson said. "Could I hear the rest of it some
time?"
"No." He realized his curtness and added, "It is the Song of Parting
for lovers. Very personal."
He found that he was still holding Leila's hand, and dropped it hastily.
Ellis, who had risen high in Diplomatic for good reasons, stepped
competently into the breach.
"Night duty calls," Ellis said. "Let's be off."
THE END
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK INCONSTANCY
***
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the
United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms
of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying,
performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this
work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes
no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in
any country other than the United States.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.