(eBook PDF) Research Methods in

Psychology 6th Edition

Go to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-research-methods-in-psychology-6th-editi
on/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...

(eBook PDF) Research Methods in Psychology 5th Edition

http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-research-methods-in-
psychology-5th-edition/

(eBook PDF) Research In Psychology Methods And Design,

8th Edition

http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-research-in-psychology-
methods-and-design-8th-edition/

(eBook PDF) Research Methods and Statistics in

Psychology 3rd Edition

http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-research-methods-and-
statistics-in-psychology-3rd-edition/

(eBook PDF) Research Methods in Psychology:

Investigating Human Behavior 3rd Edition

http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-research-methods-in-
psychology-investigating-human-behavior-3rd-edition/
(eBook PDF) Introduction to Qualitative Research
Methods in Psychology 4th Edition

http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-introduction-to-
qualitative-research-methods-in-psychology-4th-edition/

(eBook PDF) Psychology Research Methods 1st Edition

http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-psychology-research-
methods-1st-edition/

(eBook PDF) Research Methods in Psychology: From Theory

to Practice, Canadian Edition

http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-research-methods-in-
psychology-from-theory-to-practice-canadian-edition/

(Original PDF) Research Methods in Psychology:

Evaluating a World of Information 3rd Edition

http://ebooksecure.com/product/original-pdf-research-methods-in-
psychology-evaluating-a-world-of-information-3rd-edition/

(eBook PDF) Research Methods in Psychology: Evaluating

a World of Information Second Edition

http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-research-methods-in-
psychology-evaluating-a-world-of-information-second-edition/
Research Methods
in Psychology
Dennis Howitt & Duncan Cramer
Sixth Edition
 Contents

Guided tour xvii

Introduction xix
Acknowledgements xxi

Part 1 Basics of research 1

1 Role of research in psychology 3

Overview 3
1.1 Introduction 4
1.2 The importance of reading 5
1.3 Evaluating the evidence 6
1.4 Inferring causality 8
1.5 Types of research and the assessment of causality 11
1.6 Practice 21
1.7 Conclusion 24
Key points 25
Activities 26

2 Aims and hypotheses in research 27

Overview 27
2.1 Introduction 28
2.2 Types of study 29
2.3 Aims of research 31
2.4 Research hypotheses 32
2.5 Four types of hypothesis 33
2.6 Difficulties in formulating aims and hypotheses 37
2.7 Conclusion 43
Key points 43
Activities 44
viii CONTENTS

3 Variables, concepts and measures 45

Overview 45
3.1 Introduction 46
3.2 History of the variable in psychology 46
3.3 Types of variable 48
3.4 Independent and dependent variables 50
3.5 Measurement characteristics of variables 50
3.6 Stevens’ theory of scales of measurement 53
3.7 Operationalising concepts and variables 58
3.8 Conclusion 61
Key points 62
Activities 62

4 Problems of generalisation and decision-making in research: Chance findings and

sample size 63
Overview 63
4.1 Introduction 64
4.2 Universalism 65
4.3 Sampling and generalisation 66
4.4 Statistics and generalisation 70
4.5 Directional and non-directional hypotheses again 73
4.6 More on the similarity between measures of effect (difference) and association 75
4.7 Sample size and size of association 77
4.8 Conclusion 83
Key points 84
Activities 84

5 Research reports: The total picture 85

Overview 85
5.1 Introduction 86
5.2 Overall strategy of report writing 87
5.3 Sections of the research report in detail 93
5.4 Conclusion 111
Key points 113
Activities 114

6 Improving your quantitative write-up 115

Overview 115
6.1 Introduction 116
6.2 Poorly written quantitative report 117
 CONTENTS ix

6.3 Analysis of the report 121

6.4 Improved version of the report 128
6.5 Conclusion 134
Key points 134
Activities 135

7 Literature search 136

Overview 136
7.1 Introduction 137
7.2 Library classification systems 143
7.3 Electronic databases 146
7.4 Obtaining articles not in your library 154
7.5 Personal bibliographic database software 157
7.6 Conclusion 160
Key points 160
Activities 161

8 Ethics and data management in research 162

Overview 162
8.1 Introduction 163
8.2 Ethics: general principles 165
8.3 Research ethics 165
8.4 Ethics and publication 173
8.5 How to obtain a participant’s consent 174
8.6 Data management 176
8.7 Conclusion 178
Key points 179
Activities 180

Part 2 Quantitative research methods 183

9 Basic laboratory experiments 185

Overview 185
9.1 Introduction 186
9.2 Characteristics of the true or randomised experiment 189
9.3 More advanced research designs 197
9.4 Conclusion 210
Key points 211
Activity 211
x CONTENTS

10 Advanced experimental designs 212

Overview 212
10.1 Introduction 213
10.2 Multiple levels of the independent variable 214
10.3 Multiple dependent variables 218
10.4 Factorial designs 219
10.5 Psychology and social psychology of the laboratory experiment 224
10.6 Conclusion 231
Key points 232
Activities 232

11 Cross-sectional or correlational research: Non-manipulation studies 234

Overview 234
11.1 Introduction 235
11.2 Cross-sectional designs 236
11.3 The case for non-manipulation studies 238
11.4 Key concepts in the analysis of cross-sectional studies 240
11.5 Conclusion 248
Key points 248
Activities 248

12 Longitudinal studies 249

Overview 249
12.1 Introduction 250
12.2 Panel designs 252
12.3 Different types of third variable 254
12.4 Analysis of non-experimental designs 257
12.5 Conclusion 262
Key points 263
Activities 263

13 Sampling and population surveys 264

Overview 264
13.1 Introduction 265
13.2 Types of probability sampling 266
13.3 Non-probability sampling 269
13.4 National surveys 271
13.5 Socio-demographic characteristics of samples 274
13.6 Sample size and population surveys 275
13.7 Conclusion 281
 CONTENTS xi

Key points 282

Activities 282

14 Data analysis issues and scientific progress 283

Overview 283
14.1 Introduction 284
14.2 Confidence intervals 287
14.3 Effect sizes 290
14.4 Power 291
14.5 Replication Crisis 296
14.6 Questionable research practices and truth inflation 298
14.7 Conclusion 304
Key points 307
Activities 307

Part 3 Fundamentals of testing and measurement 309

15 Psychological tests: Their use and construction 311

Overview 311
15.1 Introduction 312
15.2 Concept of a scale 313
15.3 Scale construction 315
15.4 Item analysis or factor analysis? 324
15.5 Other considerations in test construction 326
15.6 Conclusion 328
Key points 329
Activities 329

16 Reliability and validity: Evaluating the value of tests and measures 330
Overview 330
16.1 Introduction 331
16.2 Reliability of measures 332
16.3 Validity 336
16.4 Types of validity 336
16.5 Conclusion 345
Key points 345
Activity 346
xii CONTENTS

17 Coding data 347

Overview 347
17.1 Introduction 348
17.2 Types of coding 349
17.3 Reliability and validity when coding 353
17.4 Qualitative coding 355
17.5 Conclusion 358
Key points 358
Activities 359

Part 4 Qualitative research methods 361

18 Why qualitative research? 363

Overview 363
18.1 Introduction 364
18.2 What is qualitative research? 365
18.3 History of the qualitative/quantitative divide in psychology 368
18.4 Quantification–qualitative methods continuum 371
18.5 Evaluation of qualitative versus quantitative methods 375
18.6 Conclusion 377
Key points 377
Activity 378

19 Qualitative data collection 379

Overview 379
19.1 Introduction 380
19.2 Major qualitative data collection approaches 381
19.3 Conclusion 390
Key points 390
Activities 391

20 Transcribing language data: Jefferson system 392

Overview 392
20.1 Introduction 393
20.2 Jefferson transcription 394
20.3 Advice for transcribers 399
20.4 Conclusion 400
 CONTENTS xiii

Key points 400

Activities 401

21 Thematic analysis 402

Overview 402
21.1 Introduction 403
21.2 What is thematic analysis? 404
21.3 Basic approach to thematic analysis 406
21.4 More sophisticated version of thematic analysis 409
21.5 Conclusion 416
Key points 417
Activity 417

22 Grounded theory 418

Overview 418
22.1 Introduction 419
22.2 Development of grounded theory 421
22.3 Data in grounded theory 423
22.4 How to do grounded theory analysis 423
22.5 Computer grounded theory analysis 428
22.6 Evaluation of grounded theory 431
22.7 Conclusion 433
Key points 434
Activity 434

23 Discourse analysis 435

Overview 435
23.1 Introduction 436
23.2 Basic discourse analysis theory 438
23.3 The agenda of discourse analysis 440
23.4 Doing discourse analysis 442
23.5 Conclusion 447
Key points 447
Activities 447

24 Conversation analysis 448

Overview 448
24.1 Introduction 449
24.2 Precepts of conversation analysis 452
24.3 Stages in conversation analysis 453
xiv CONTENTS

24.4 Conclusion 458

Key points 458
Activities 459

25 Interpretative phenomenological analysis 460

Overview 460
25.1 Introduction 461
25.2 Philosophical foundations of interpretative phenomenological analysis 462
25.3 Stages in interpretative phenomenological analysis 469
25.4 Conclusion 475
Key points 475
Activities 476

26 Evaluating qualitative research 477

Overview 477
26.1 Introduction 478
26.2 Criteria for novices 478
26.3 Evaluating qualitative research 480
26.4 Validity 483
26.5 Conclusion 486
Key points 487
Activities 487

27 Improving your qualitative write-up 488

Overview 488
27.1 Introduction 489
27.2 Poorly written qualitative report 494
27.3 Critical evaluation 500
27.4 Conclusion 504
Key points 505
Activities 505

Part 5 Research for projects, dissertations and theses 507

28 Developing ideas for research 509

Overview 509
28.1 Introduction 510
28.2 Why not a replication study? 512
 CONTENTS xv

28.3 Choosing a research topic 516

28.4 Sources of research ideas 518
28.5 Conclusion 525
Key points 526
Activity 526

29 Managing your research project 527

Overview 527
29.1 Introduction 528
29.2 Advice for consideration 528
29.3 Conclusion 534
Key points 535

Glossary 536
References 543
Index 555
Companion Website ON THE
WEBSITE
For open-access student resources specifically written
to complement this textbook and support your learning,
please visit go.pearson.com/uk/he/resources
 Guided tour
4 PART 1 BASICS OF RESEARCH

CHAPTER 1 1.1 Introduction

Research is exciting – the lifeblood of psychology. The subject matter of psychology is

Role of research in
fascinating, but this is not enough. Although initially psychology provides many intrigu-
ing ideas about the nature of people and society, as one matures intellectually, the chal-
lenges and complexities of the research processes which stimulated these ideas increasingly
become part of one’s understanding of psychology. There are many engaging psycho-

psychology
Overview
● Research is central to all the activities of psychologists as it is to modern life in general.
A key assumption of psychology is that the considered and careful collection of research
data is an essential part of the development of the discipline.
● Most psychology involves the integration of theoretical notions with the outcomes of
research. Psychology characteristically emphasises causal explanations. Many psychologists
adhere to the belief that a prime purpose of research is to test causal propositions, though
this is far from universal.
logical issues: for example, why do some relationships last? Is there a purpose behind
dreaming? What causes depression and what can we do to alleviate it? Can we improve
our memory to make us study more efficiently and, if so, how? Why are we aggressive
and can we do anything to make us less so? What are the rules which govern everyday
conversation? Psychology’s subject matter is enormously diverse which ensures that our
individual interests are well catered for. Research methods themselves reflect this diversity.
Psychology comes in many forms and so does good psychological research.
Students often see research methods as a dull, dry and difficult topic largely tolerated
rather than enjoyed. They much prefer other modules on exciting topics such as child devel-
opment, mental illness, forensic investigation, brain structure and thought. They overlook
that these exciting ideas are the work of committed researchers. For these psychologists,
psychology and research methods are intertwined – psychology and the means of devel-
oping psychological ideas through research cannot be differentiated. For instance, it is
stimulating to learn that we are attracted to people who have the same or similar attitudes
to ourselves. The sort of research which supports this idea should also be of interest. This
is a start but additional issues will spring to many of our minds about this. For example,
why should we be attracted to people who have similar attitudes to our own? Do opposites
never attract? When does similarity lead to attraction and when does dissimilarity lead to
attraction? The answer may have already been found to such questions. If not, the need for
research is obvious. Research makes us think hard – which is the purpose of any academic
discipline. The more thinking that we do about research, the better we become at it.
Box 1.1 gives explanations of basic concepts such as ‘variable’ and ‘correlation’ which
you may be unfamiliar with.

● A first-rate psychologist – researcher or practitioner – needs to be familiar with the tech-

niques of good research both to evaluate effectively the value of other ‘researchers’ ’ work
and develop their own research.
● All psychologists must develop the necessary knowledge to understand research reports Box 1.1 Key Ideas
in detail. They need to appreciate the purposes, advantages and disadvantages of different
research methods employed in research on topics they are interested in.
● Often research reports are concisely written and so assume knowledge of the topic and Some essential concepts in research
research methods commonly used. Student training in psychology includes research meth-
ods to prepare them for this. Knowledge of basic research methods enhances the ease with ● Cause Something which results in an effect, action or include flipping a coin and drawing slips of paper from
research reports may be understood. condition. a hat. So each participant has an equal chance of being
allocated to the experimental or control conditions.
● Psychologists traditionally distinguish between true experiments and non-experiments. ● Data The information from which inferences are
The experimental and control conditions involve dif-
Laboratory studies are usually true experiments whereas non-experiments are more typical drawn and conclusions reached. A lot of data are col-
ferences in procedure related to the hypothesis under
of more naturalistic studies in the field (community or other real-life settings). lected in numerical form but textual data may also be
examination. Randomisation is used to avoid system-
appropriate.
● Many psychologists argue that true experiments (laboratory studies) generally provide more atic differences between the experimental and control
convincing tests of causal propositions. Others dispute this, primarily on the grounds that ● Randomised experiment This refers to a type of conditions prior to the experimental manipulation.
true experiments achieve precision at the expense of realism. research in which participants in research are allocated Random selection is fully explained in Chapter 13. The
at random (by chance) to an experimental or control randomised experiment can also be referred to as the
● Conducting one’s own research is the fast route to understanding research methods. It is seen
condition. Simple methods of random assignment randomised trial.
as integral to the training and work of all psychologists – both practitioners and academics.

Clear Overview Key Ideas

Introduces the chapter to give students a feel for the Outlines the important concepts in more depth to give
topics covered you a fuller understanding

Practical Advice
CHAPTER 5 RESEARCH REPORTS 95

Gives you handy hints and tips on how to carry out

Box 5.2 Practical Advice
Important points to summarise in the abstract
Ideally, the following should be outlined in the abstract.
Normally, subheadings are not used except in structured
abstracts, though this rule may be broken if necessary.
They are given here simply for purposes of clarity.
● Introduction This is a brief statement justifying the
research and explaining the purpose, followed by a
short statement of the research question or the main
hypotheses. The justification may be in terms of the
social or practical utility of the research, its relevance to
theory, or even the absence of previous research. Prob-
ably no more than 30 per cent of the abstract will be
such introductory material.
● Method This is a broad orientation to the type of
research that was carried out. Often a simple phrase will
be sufficient to orient the reader to the style of research
in question. So phrases like ‘Brain activity was studied
using PET (positron emission tomography) and FMRI
(functional magnetic resonance imaging) . . .’, ‘A con-
trolled experiment was conducted . . .’, ‘The interview
transcripts were analysed using discourse analysis . . .’
and ‘A survey was conducted . . .’ suggest a great deal
about the way in which the research was carried out
without being wordy.
● Participants This will consist of essential detail about
the sample(s) employed, for example, ‘Interview data
from an opportunity sample consisting of young car-
ers of older relatives was compared with a sample of
young people entering the labour market for the first
time, matched for age’.
● Procedure This should identify the main measures
employed, for example, ‘Loneliness was assessed using
the shortened UCLA loneliness scale. A new scale was
developed to measure social support’. By stipulating the
important measures employed, one also identifies the
key variables. For an experiment, in addition it would
research in practice
be appropriate to describe how the different conditions
were created (i.e. manipulated), for example, ‘Levels
of hunger were manipulated by asking participants to
refrain from eating or drinking for one hour, three hours
and six hours prior to the experiment’.
● Results There is no space in an abstract for elabo-
rate presentations of the statistical analyses that the
researcher may have carried out. Typically, however,
broad indications are given of the style of analysis, for
example, ‘Factor analysis of the 20-item anxiety scale
revealed two main factors’, ‘The groups were compared
using a mixed-design ANOVA’ or ‘Binomial logistic
regression revealed five main factors which differenti-
ated men and women’. Now these statistical techniques
may be meaningless to you at the moment but they will
not be to most researchers. They refer to very distinct
types of analysis, so the terms are very informative to
researchers. In addition, the major findings of the sta-
tistical analysis need to be reported. Normally, this will
be the important, statistically significant features of the
data analysis. Of course, sometimes the lack of signifi-
cance is the most important thing to draw attention to
in the abstract. There is no need and usually no space to
use the succinct methods of the reporting of statistics in
the abstract. So things like [t(17) = 2.43, p 6 .05] are
rare in abstracts and best omitted.
● Discussion In an abstract, the discussion (and con-
clusions) need to be confined to the main things that
the reader should take away from the research. As
ever, there are a number of ways of doing this. If you
have already stated the hypothesis, then you need do
little other than confirm whether or not this was sup-
ported, given any limitations you think are important
concerning your research, and possibly mention any
crucial recommendations for further research activity
in the field.

it is not a substitute for eventually reading that article. A badly written abstract may deter
some researchers from reading the original research report and may cause others to waste
effort obtaining a report which is not quite what they expected it to be.
Since the abstract provides a summary of the entire paper, having read the abstract,
the reader will know what to expect in the report and this speeds up and simplifies the
task of reading. First impressions are important, so writing the abstract should not be
xviii GUIDED TOUR

CHAPTER 5 RESEARCH REPORTS 109 92 PART 1 BASICS OF RESEARCH

■ Appendix or appendices
Appendices are a rarity because they are space-consuming. Appendices do help to avoid
cluttering up the main body of the report with overlong detail that might confuse the
reader and hamper good presentation. So, for example, it may be perfectly sensible to
include your 50-item questionnaire in your report, but common sense may dictate that
it is put at the very end of the report in the section for appendices. In this case, it would
be usual to give indicative examples of questions under ‘Materials’ and refer the reader
to the appendix. Similarly, the multitude of tables that the statistical analysis may gener-
ate may fit uncomfortably in the results section but have a more suitable location in an
appendix. Remember the following:
● Refer to the relevant appendix in the main text where appropriate.
● Number and title the appendices appropriately in order to facilitate their location.
● You may be evaluated partly on the basis of the contents of your appendices. It is inap-
propriate simply to place a load of junk material there.
Box 5.8 Research Example
● A good rule-of-thumb is to give the results of calculations to two decimal places or
less, as the APA recommends. Avoid spuriously implying a greater degree of accuracy
than psychological data usually possess. Whatever you do, be consistent. You need to
understand how to round to two decimals. Basically, if the original number ends with
a figure of 5 or above then we round up, otherwise we round down. So 21.4551 gives
21.46 rounded, whereas 21.4549 gives 21.45 rounded. If whatever you have calculated
can have a value of above one, then any calculation less than one should be written as
0.45, etc. If what you have calculated cannot have a value of greater than 1, then omit
the figure before the decimal point. A correlation coefficient would be written as .32
because its maximum value is 1.0.
● Psychological terms may not have a standard definition that is accepted by all research-
ers. Consequently, you may find it necessary to define how you are using terms in your
report. Always remember that definitions in psychology are rarely definitive and they
are often problematic in themselves.
● Regarding layout, normally the recommendation is to double-space your work and
word-process it. According to the APA, 12-point Times New Roman is preferable.
However, check local requirements on these matters. Leave wide margins for com-
ments. The underlying assumption behind this is that the report is being reviewed by
another person. A report that will not be commented upon might not require double
spacing. Check the local rules where you are studying.

Layout of a brief paper from an American Psychological

Association journal Box 5.1 Talking Point
Dickson, J. M., Moberly, N. J., & Kinderman, P. (2011). Depressed people are not less motivated by personal goals
but are more pessimistic about attaining them. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 975–980.
Avoiding bias in language
While this chapter has been largely about how, as a student, you should write up your reports of your research, the ulti- Racism, sexism, homophobia and hostility to minorities A few examples of what to avoid are:
mate aim is to develop research skills to a professional level. Professional researchers publish their research in research such as people with disabilities violate psychological ethics.
● Writing things like ‘the black sample . . .’ can readily
journals, of which there are many in psychology. Quite often, student research is of sufficient quality to be published – Racist, sexist and other forms of unacceptable modes of
be modified to ‘the sample of black people . . .’ or, if
especially final-year research projects in psychology degrees, and the work of postgraduate students perhaps even more expression (e.g. homophobic) are to be avoided in psycho-
you prefer, ‘the sample of people of colour . . .’. In this
so. So you may well find that you are asked to prepare your work with your research supervisor for publication. Of logical writings as elsewhere. They may lead to the material
way, the most important characteristic is drawn atten-
course, such publications look extremely good in one’s CV. The format of a journal article is exacting and writing your being rejected for publication. There is no simple list of
tion to: the fact that you are referring to people first and
first journal article (and your last) is a demanding activity. Here we will look at a published study in the light of the dos and don’ts to be avoided. They can manifest them-
foremost who also happen to be black. You might also
requirements of professional publication in journals. selves in multiple ways which may well change with time.
wish to ask why one needs to refer to the race of people
The Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA) recommends how a research paper should For example, Howitt and Owusu-Bempah (1994) trace the
at all.
be written and structured for publication in the journals published by the association. Many other psychological journals history of racism in psychology and its change over time.
stipulate that the APA’s suggestions should be followed. APA journals often publish papers which are longer than 5000 The appalling racism of psychology from a century ago is ● Avoid referring to racial (or gender or other) character-
words and which typically describe a number of related studies rather than just one. Some of their journals, such as the readily identified as such; it is harder to recognise in current istics of participants which are irrelevant to the report’s
Journal of Abnormal Psychology, permit the publication of brief reports, which should not be longer than 5000 words. psychology. For detailed examples of racism in psychology substance. For example, ‘Female participant Y was a
This word limit includes everything such as the title, the references and any notes. The Publication Manual was last see Owusu-Bempah and Howitt (1995) and Howitt and black lone-parent . . .’. This contains the elements of a
revised in 2010, so papers are expected to follow these latest recommendations. Owusu-Bempah (1990). A useful first-step towards elimi- stereotypical portrayal of black people as being associ-
The APA Publication Manual has a Checklist for Manuscript Submission which lists some of the requirements that a nation of unacceptable ideas in your writing is to undergo ated with father absence and ‘broken families’.
paper needs to meet before it is considered for publication. There is also a free tutorial on their website which outlines the specialised awareness training. This is increasingly avail-
able in universities and many work locations. In this way, ● Do not refer to man, mankind or social man, for exam-
basics of the APA style. Visit https://www.apa.org/ Click on publications and databases, then choose the link to APA style
the inadvertent propagation of your racial, sexist, and ple. These terms do not make people think of man and
➔ woman but of men only. Words like ‘people’ can be
other biases may be minimised.

Research Example Talking Point

Explores a real example of research being carried out, Investigates an important debate or issue in research
giving you an insight into the process

CHAPTER 2 AIMS AND HYPOTHESES IN RESEARCH 43 44 PART 1 BASICS OF RESEARCH

2.7 Conclusion ● The variable thought to be the cause may be called the independent variable and the variable presumed to
be the effect the dependent variable. Some researchers feel that these two terms should be restricted to
the variables in a true experiment. In non-experiments, the variable assumed to be the cause may be called
It is almost a truism to suggest that the aims and hypotheses of research should be clear. the predictor and the variable considered to be the effect the criterion.
This may seem difficult early on and perseverance is needed. Since research is one way by
which psychological knowledge and ideas develop, it is almost inevitable that aims and
hypotheses go through a process of refinement. Reformulation of one’s aims and objec-
tives commonly occurs in the research planning stage, and sometimes after. All research is
guided by aims, but hypotheses are only universal in certain types of research – especially
true experiments – where it is possible to specify likely outcomes fairly precisely. Hypoth-
eses are best included wherever possible, since they represent the distillation of the ACTIVITIES
researcher’s thoughts about the subject matter. Sometimes, for non-experimental studies,
the formulation of hypotheses becomes too cumbersome to be of value. Hence, many 1. Choose a recent study that has been referred to either in research you are reading or in a lecture that you have attended.
excellent studies in psychology will not include hypotheses. What kind of aim or aims did the study have in terms of the aims mentioned in this chapter? What were the specific aims
The true experiment (e.g. the laboratory experiment) has many advantages in terms of of this study? What kinds of variables were manipulated or measured? If the study involved testing hypotheses, were
the testing of hypotheses: (a) its ability to randomise participants to conditions, (b) the the direction and the causal nature of the relationship specified? If the hypothesis was stated in a causal form, was the
requirement of manipulating the independent variable rather than using already existing design a true (i.e. randomised) one?
variables such as gender, and (c) the control over variables. Although we have largely 2. You wish to test the hypothesis that we are what we eat. How could you do this? What variables could you measure?
discussed the testing of a single hypothesis at a time, very little research is so restricted.
Most research studies have several aims and several hypotheses, because we are usually
interested how several different variables may be related to one another. Economies of
time and effort result by considering several hypotheses in one study.
The penultimate section of this book on qualitative research methods shows how
valuable research can proceed using a quite different approach in which the idea of speci-
fied aims and hypotheses is something of an anathema. Nevertheless, much research in
mainstream psychology either overtly or tacitly subscribes to hypothesis testing as an
ideal. Later (Chapter 18) we present an overview of the theoretical basis to these different
approaches to research.

Key points

● Research studies have different general aims. Most seem to be concerned with testing causal propositions or
hypotheses. Others may describe a phenomenon or intervention in detail, estimate how common a behaviour
is in some population, evaluate the effects of interventions, or statistically summarise the results of similar
studies. The aim or aims of a study should be clearly and accurately stated.
● Studies which test causal propositions should describe clearly and accurately what these propositions are.
● The research study should make a contribution to the topic. While research usually builds on previous research
in an area, the contribution of the study should be original to some extent in the sense that the particular
question addressed has not been entirely investigated in this way before.
● A hypothesis describes what the relationship is expected to be between two or more variables. The hypothesis
should be stated in a causal form when the study is a true experiment. It should be stated in a non-causal
form when the study is a non-experiment.
● When suggesting that variables may be related to one another, we usually expect the variables to be related in
a particular way or direction. When this is the case, we should specify in the hypothesis what this direction is.
➔

Conclusion/Key points Activities

Each chapter has a conclusion and set of key points to Each chapter concludes with activities to help you test
help summarise chapter coverage when you’re revising your knowledge and explore the issues further
a topic
Introduction

Modern psychological research can seem daunting to the newcomer. This sixth edition
of Research Methods in Psychology seeks to introduce a broad range of topics dealing
with psychological research and analysis as currently practised. We cover statistical meth-
ods in psychology in a separate volume. Good research requires considerable thought,
understanding, experience, and attention to detail. It is far from a simple rule-following
exercise and to pretend otherwise is a great disservice to students. The incredible progress
of modern psychology requires that teaching resources must struggle to be up to date
and be appropriate for the variety of different educational experiences provided by dif-
ferent universities. We do not expect that this sixth edition will be read from beginning
to end. Instead, choose what is appropriate for your needs from our sequence of largely
self-contained chapters.
In Research Methods in Psychology you will find both quantitative and qualitative
research covered in appropriate depth. These are commonly but, we think, wrongly seen
as alternative and incompatible approaches to psychological research. For some research-
ers, there may be an intellectual incompatibility between the two. Increasingly, however,
researchers appreciate that the two approaches can feed each other. Even if we are wrong
about this, it is vitally important that students understand the intellectual roots of the
two traditions, how research is carried out in these traditions, and what each tradition
is capable of achieving. Armed with this understanding, students will be better placed
to make intelligent and appropriate choices about the style of research appropriate to
their chosen research questions. On its own, the qualitative material in this sixth edition
effectively supports much of the qualitative research likely to be carried out today. There
is as much detailed practical advice and theory on qualitative research methods as prob-
ably required. (If more is required, the book by Dennis Howitt (2019), Introduction to
Qualitative Research Methods in Psychology, Harlow: Pearson Education, will probably
meet your requirements.) But this is in addition to the quantitative coverage, which easily
outstrips any competition in terms of variety, depth and authority. We have tried to pro-
vide students with resources to help them in ways largely ignored by most other texts. For
example, Chapter 7 on literature searches is extremely comprehensive and practical. Simi-
larly, Chapter 8 on ethics meets the most recent standards and deals with them in depth.
Chapter 5 on writing research reports places report writing at the centre of the research
process rather than as an add-on at the end. Writing a research report is highly demanding
of a student’s understanding of all of the elements of research. We provide practical help
to this end by including chapters giving examples of quantitative and qualitative research
which fail to meet the highest standards. You will also find some discussion of statistics in
this book. For the most part, this is when dealing with topics which are missing from the
popular SPSS-based statistics textbooks, simply because SPSS does not cover everything
useful in psychological research. Statistics is a more controversial topic in psychology
than struggling students may realise. So we have included a chapter on some of the more
controversial aspects of statistics which may encourage a more mature understanding of
the role of statistics in psychology. For the sixth edition, we have included new material
xx INTRODUCTION

on important but recent topics including multi-method research and data mining. The
final chapter is new and is tips and hints which may help you cope better with the stresses
and turmoil that planning and executing research may bring.
As far as is possible, we have tried to provide students with practical skills as well as
the necessary conceptual overview of research methods in modern psychology. Neverthe-
less, there is a limit to this. The bottom line is that anyone wishing to understand research
needs to read research, not merely plan, execute, analyse and write up research. Hence,
almost from the start we emphasise that reading is not merely unavoidable but crucial.
Without such additional reading, the point of this book is missed. It is not intended as a
jumble of technical stuff too boring to be part of any module other than one on research
methods. The material in the book is intended to expand students’ understanding of psy-
chology by explaining just how researchers go about creating psychology. At times this
can be quite exciting as well as frustrating and demanding.
 Acknowledgements

■ Authors’ acknowledgements
Working with the team at Pearson on a book project is always a delight. Working without
the team at Pearson on a book project is unimaginable. So we would like to offer our
thanks to everyone involved for their kindness and hard work. But there are a few people
that we would like to give a particular mention.
We have worked with Janey Webb for a good many years on numerous book projects.
No matter what, she always gave 110% but, sadly, she has moved on from Pearson. It is
difficult to describe the incredible support that she provided over all that time. Her official
title was Publisher but she was just Janey to us. She is a remarkable person who will be
missed. Partings of this sort are common in publishing but we also have said goodbye
to Saraswati Banerjee who was Acquisition Editor for a while. She was also a rock and
great support. We wish them both well wherever life leads them. This means that we can
welcome Catherine Yates as the Publisher who has taken over from Janey.
We hope that you can tell a book by its cover as we think that the cover design, by
Kelly Miller, is excellent and we wish her success after her departure from Pearson. Kevin
Ancient took charge of the cover after this and did the all-important text design. He easily
holds the record for the number of acknowledgements in our books.
The Project Manager is Sweda R who is just about the most helpful person imaginable.
Unfortunately we never know whether to address her as Sweda or R. Maybe R sounds a
bit too James Bondish. Perhaps all of us should be a letter.
Bincy Menon had overall responsibility for turning our manuscript into a fine looking
book in her role as Content Producer. It never ceases to amaze us that a human being can
oversee such a process yet remain charming and friendly.
The Copyeditor was Antonia Maxwell. Not only is she better at spotting our mistakes
than even we are at making them, she imposed the text design on our manuscript with
great aplomb. This cannot be easy for a book like this with its many elements. Even more
remarkable is her ability not to appear irritated by the authors when surely she must have
been.
Heather Ancient was the Proofreader for this edition. Proofreader is a word used to
describe a very wise, very clever, very organized person with extremely high tolerance of
boredom. Such qualities are not possible in just one human being which confirms our
view that all proof readers are androids.
Finally, we should express our gratitude to Karen Mclaren who is the rhyming R&P
Analyst at Pearson. R&P stands for Rights and Permissions. She stops us getting in big
trouble with copyright holders. This makes us happy though sorting things out does not.

Dennis Howitt
Duncan Cramer
xxii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

■ Publisher’s acknowledgements
Text credits:
38 W. W. Norton & Company: Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal con-
structs. Volume 1: A theory of personality. New York, NY: Norton; 41 American Psycho-
logical Association: Byrne, D., & Blaylock, B. (1963). Similarity and assumed similarity
of attitudes between husbands and wives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,
67, 636–640; 48 American Psychological Association: Danziger, K., & Dzinas, K. (1997).
How psychology got its variables. Canadian Psychology, 38, 43–48; 59–60 American
Psychological Association: Condon, J. W., & Crano, W. D. (1988). Inferred evaluation
and the relation between attitude similarity and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Per-
sonality and Social Psychology, 54, 789–797; 82 Sage Publications: Byrne, D., Gouaux,
C., Griffitt, W., Lamberth, J., Murakawa, N., Prasad, M., Prasad, A., & Ramirez III, M.
(1971). The ubiquitous relationship: Attitude similarity and attraction: A cross-cultural
study. Human Relations, 24, 201–207; 110 American Psychological Association: Dick-
son, J. M., Moberly, N. J., & Kinderman, P. (2011). Depressed people are not less moti-
vated by personal goals but are more pessimistic about attaining them. Journal of
Abnormal Psychology, 120, 975–980; 116 Elsevier: Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C. (1974).
Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between lan-
guage and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 13, 585–589; 118
American Psychological Association: Pickering, M. (1984). Elizabeth Loftus: An Appre-
ciation. Genuflecting Psychology Review, 29, 29–43; 163–164 The British Psychological
Society: British Psychological Society (2011). Code of human research ethics. Leicester,
UK: BPS. p. 5; 171 State University of New York Press: Korn, J. H. (1997). Illusions of
reality: A history of deception in social psychology. New York, NY: State University of
New York Press; 180 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Keith-Spiegel, P., & Koocher, G. P.
(1985). Ethics in psychology: Professional standards and cases. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates. p. 35; 181 Harper & Row: Steffens, L. (1931). Autobiography of
Lincoln Steffens. New York, NY: Harper & Row. p. 151; 235 Houghton Mifflin Com-
pany: Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental
designs for research. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. p. 1; 236 Houghton Mifflin Com-
pany: Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasiexperimentation: Design and analy-
sis issues for field settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally. p. 295; 244 Taylor & Francis
Group: Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design and analysis: An
integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 44–45; 246 Elsevier:
Eagle, B. W., Miles, E. W., & Icenogle, M. L. (1997). Interrole conflicts and the permeabil-
ity of work and family domains: Are there gender differences? Journal of Vocational Behav-
ior, 50, 168–184; 251 Houghton Mifflin Company: Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979).
Quasiexperimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago, IL: Rand
McNally; 255 American Psychological Association: Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986).
The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Concep-
tual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
51, 1173–1182; 261 Sage Publications: Fincham, F. D., Beach, S. R. H., Harold, G.
T., & Osborne, L. N. (1997). Marital satisfaction and depression: Different causal rela-
tionships for men and women? Psychological Science, 8, 351–357; 271 Houghton Mifflin
Company: Hays, W. L. (1994). Statistics (5th ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace. p. 227;
271 Pearson Education: Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K. D. (1984). Statistical methods in
education and psychology (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
p. 177; 271 Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland: Fisher, R. A.
(1936b). “The coefficient of racial likeness” and the future of craniometry. Journal of the
Royal Anthropological Institute, 66, 57–63. Retrieved February 6, 2016 from https://
digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/handle/2440/15228; 274 Office for National
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xxiii

Statistics: SOC: Archive Older versions of the UK Standard Occupational Classification,

containing SOC 2000, Office for National Statistics, https://www.ons.gov.uk/methodol-
ogy/classificationsandstandards/standardoccupationalclassificationsoc/socarchive#about-
the-standard-occupational-classification-2000-soc2000; 280 American Psychological
Association: Hamby, S., & Turner, H. (2013). Measuring teen dating violence in males
and females: Insights from the National Survey of Children’s Exposure to Violence,
Psychology of Violence, 3, 323–339; 284 American Psychological Association: Wilkinson,
L. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. Amer-
ican Psychologist, 54, 594–604; 285 American Psychological Association: American Psy-
chological Association (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological
Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: APA. p. 3,30; 286 No Starch Press, Inc: Reinhart,
A. (2015). Statistics done wrong: The woefully complete guide. San Francisco, CA: No
Starch Press. p. 9; 286 Andy Field: Field, A. (2005). Effect Size. www.statisticshell.com/
docs/effectsizes.pdf; 289 No Starch Press, Inc: Reinhart, A. (2015). Statistics done wrong:
The woefully complete guide. San Francisco, CA: No Starch Press; 289 GraphPad Soft-
ware, Inc: Graphpad (2015). Interpreting the confidence interval of a mean. http://www.
graphpad.com/guides/prism/6/statistics/index.htm?stat_more_about_confidence_interval.
htm; 292 American Psychological Association: Rosnow, R. I., & Rosenthal, R. (1989).
Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. American
Psychologist, 44, 1276–1284; 296 Elsevier: Pietschnig, J., Voracek, M., & Formann, A.
K. (2010). Mozart effect–Shmozart effect: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 38, 314–323;
298–299 Sage Publications: Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-
positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows present-
ing anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366; 301 Sage Publications:
John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of question-
able research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23,
524–532; 306 American Psychological Association: Atkinson, D. R., Furlong, M. J., &
Wampold, B. E. (1982). Statistical significance, reviewer evaluations, and the scientific
process: Is there a (statistically) significant relationship? Journal of Counseling Psychol-
ogy, 29, 189–194; 328 Hogrefe Verlag: Arribas-Aguila, D. (2011). Psychometric proper-
ties of the TEA Personality Test: Evidence of reliability and construct validity. European
Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27, 121–126; 339-340 American Psychological
Association: Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological
tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302; 343-345 National Center for Biotechnology
Information: Ramo, D. E., Hall, S. M., & Prochaska, J. J. (2011). Reliability and validity
of self-reported smoking in an anonymous online survey with young adults. Health
Psychology, 30, 693–701; 369–370 Sage Publications: Silverman, D. (1997). The logics
of qualitative research. In G. Miller & R. Dingwall (Eds.), Context and method in qual-
itative research (pp. 12–25). London: Sage; 370 William M.K. Trochim: Trochim, W. M.
K. (2006). Positivism and post-positivism. http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/
positvsm.htm; 382 Oxford University Press: Bryman, A. (2015). Social research methods
(5th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 393 Sage Publications: Potter, J. (1997).
Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally occurring talk. In D. Silverman (Ed.),
Qualitative research: Theory, methods and practice (pp. 144–160). London, UK: Sage;
395–398 Kelly Benneworth: Benneworth, K. (2004). A discursive analysis of police inter-
views with suspected paedophiles. Doctoral dissertation, Loughborough University,
England, reprinted with permission from Kelly Benneworth-Gray; 399 Sage Publications:
O’Connell, D. C., & Kowal, S. (1995). Basic principles of transcription. In J. A. Smith,
R. Harré, & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 93–105).
London, UK: Sage; 405 Cambridge University Press: Gee, D., Ward, T., & Eccleston, L.
(2003). The function of sexual fantasies for sexual offenders: A preliminary model.
Behaviour Change, 20, 44–60; 409 John Wiley & Sons: Sheldon, K., & Howitt, D.
(2007). Sex offenders and the Internet. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 412 Taylor & Francis:
xxiv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative
Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101; 420 Sage Publications: Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded
theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. E. Lincoln (Eds.),
Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) (pp. 503–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage;
424–426 Sage Publications: Charmaz, K. (1995). Grounded theory. In J. A. Smith, R.
Harré, & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 27–49).
London, UK: Sage; 427 Sage Publications: Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1999). Grounded
theory methodology: An overview. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Qualitative
research, Vol. 3 (pp. 73–93). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 430 Maggie O’Neil: We are
grateful to Maggie O’Neil and Jane Pitcher for help with this box; 431 Elsevier: Potter, J.
(1998). Qualitative and discourse analysis. In A. S. Bellack & M. Hersen (Eds.), Compre-
hensive clinical psychology, Vol. 3 (pp. 117–144). Oxford, UK: Pergamon; 432 Taylor &
Francis: Groom, R., Cushion, C., & Nelson, L. (2011). Delivery of video-based perfor-
mance analysis by England youth soccer coaches: Towards a grounded theory. Journal of
Applied Sport Psychology, 23, 16–23; 434 Sage Publications: Strauss, A., & Corbin, J.
(1999). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess
(Eds.), Qualitative research, Vol. 3 (pp. 73–93). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 437 Linguis-
tic Society of America: Tannen, D. (2007). Discourse analysis. Linguistic Society of Amer-
ica, http://www.lsadc.org/info/ling-fields-discourse.cfm; 438 Harvard University Press:
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press; 438 Sage Publications: Edley, N. (2001). Analysing masculinity: Interpretative
repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject positions. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S.
J. E. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 189–228). London, UK:
Sage; 438 Sage Publications: Potter, J. (2004). Discourse analysis. In M. Hardy & A.
Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 607–624). London, UK: Sage; 438 Sage
Publications: Taylor, S. (2001). Locating and conducting discourse analytic research. In
M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. E. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis
(pp. 5–48). London, UK: Sage; 439 Cambridge University Press: Searle, J. R. (1969).
Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univer-
sity Press; 441 Sage Publications: Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1995). Discourse analysis.
In J. A. Smith, R. Harré, & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology
(pp. 80–92). London, UK: Sage; 441 Sage Publications: van Dijk, T. (2001). Principles of
critical discourse analysis. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. E. Yates (Eds.), Discourse
theory and practice: A reader (pp. 300–317). London, UK: Sage; 442–443 Sage Publica-
tions: Potter, J. (2004). Discourse analysis. In M. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook
of data analysis (pp. 607–624). London, UK: Sage; 443 Sage Publications: Potter, J.
(1997). Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally occurring talk. In D. Silverman
(Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, methods and practice (pp. 144–160). London, UK:
Sage; 446 Sage Publications: Taylor, S. (2001). Locating and conducting discourse analytic
research. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. E. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide
for analysis (pp. 5–48). London, UK: Sage; 445 Sage Publications: Lovering, K. M. (1995).
The bleeding body: Adolescents talk about menstruation. In S. Wilkinson & C. Kitzinger
(Eds.), Feminism and discourse: Psychological perspectives (pp. 10–31). London: Sage;
456 Sage Publications: Wooffitt, R. (2001). Researching psychic practitioners: Conversa-
tion analysis. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. E. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide
for analysis (pp. 49–92). London: Sage; 457–458 Sage Publications: Kitzinger, C., & Frith,
H. (2001). Just say no? The use of conversation analysis in developing a feminist perspec-
tive on sexual refusal. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. E. Yates (Eds.), Discourse theory
and practice: A reader (pp. 167–185). London, UK: Sage; 465 Sage Publications: Smith,
J. A., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith
(Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 51–80). London,
UK: Sage; 467 Sage Publications: Robbins, B. D., & Parlavecchio, H. (2006). The unwanted
exposure of the self: A phenomenological study of embarrassment. The Humanistic
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
 Fig. 105. Fig. 106.

The feather edge which is formed on the inside is removed by a

few strokes of a stone called a slip. Hold the slip firmly against the
face so as not to form a bevel. Fig. 106. Slips are of various sizes;
one that fits the curvature of the gouge should be selected.
56. Sharpening Plane-Irons.—Plane-irons are sharpened straight
across like the chisel, with the
exception of the jack plane, as previously noted. Their corners,
however, are very slightly rounded off to prevent their leaving marks
on the wood. Where one plane is made to serve the purpose of
smooth, jack and fore-plane, it should be ground straight across. In
whetting, increase the pressure on the edges alternately so as to
turn up a heavier feather edge there than in the middle, thus
rounding the whole end very slightly. This feather edge may be
removed in the usual manner.
57. To Tell Whether a Tool is Sharp or Not.—Examine the
cutting edge, holding
the tool toward the light. If the tool is dull, the cutting edge will
appear as a white line, the broader the line the blunter the edge. Fig.
107 A. If the tool is sharp, no white line can be seen. Fig. 107 B.
 Fig. 107. Fig. 108.

A better way—the method a mechanic would use—is to test the

edge by drawing the thumb along it lightly. Fig. 108. If the tool is
sharp one can feel the edge “taking hold.” If dull, the thumb will slide
along the edge as it would along the back of a knife blade.
Good judgment is necessary in this test or a cut on the thumb may
be the result. No pressure is required, just a touch along the edge at
various points.
What actually takes place is this: The cutting edge, if sharp, cuts
the outer layer, the callous part of the ball of the thumb, just a little.
The sense of feeling is so keen that the resulting friction, slight as it
is, is transferred to the brain of the worker long before any injury
need be done the thumb. If the tool is dull, no cut, hence no friction
can result. Do not use the finger, as it is not calloused as is the
thumb.
 CHAPTER VI.
Form Work, Modeling.

58. Making a Cylinder.—The cylinder is evolved from the square

prism by increasing the number of sides
until a prism is formed with so many sides that its surface can be
easily transformed into a cylinder by means of sandpaper.

Fig. 109.
 (1) Begin by making a square prism which shall have the same
dimensions for its width and thickness as is desired for the diameter
of the cylinder. (2) Change this square prism to a regular octagonal
or eight-sided prism by planing off the four arrises. The gage lines
which indicate the amount to be taken off of each arris are made by
holding the gage block against each of the surfaces and gaging from
each arris each way, two lines on each surface. These lines must be
made lightly. The distance at which to set the spur of the gage from
the head is equal to one-half the diagonal of the square end of the
prism. Fig. 109. Since the ends are less likely to be accurate than
any other part, it is advisable to get this distance as follows: Lay off
two lines on the working face a distance apart equal to the width of
the prism. These lines with the two arrises form a square the
diagonal of which can be measured and one-half of it computed.
 Fig. 110.

Carpenters in working on large timbers lay the steel-square

diagonally across so that there are twenty-four divisions from arris to
arris. They then mark off the timber at seven and seventeen inches.
Fig. 110. These numbers, while not mathematically correct, are near
enough for practical purposes. In planing the arrises off, the piece
may be held in the vise or placed against the bench-stop. Fig. 111.
Care must be taken not to plane over the lines, for not only is the
one side enlarged, but the adjacent side is lessened, thus
exaggerating the error. (3) Judging with the eye the amount to take
off, plane the eight arrises until there are sixteen equal sides.

Fig. 111.

Again plane the arrises, making the piece thirty-two sided. On a

small piece this will be sufficient; if the piece is large, the process
may be continued until the piece is practically a cylinder. (4) To finish
a small cylinder wrap a piece of sandpaper around it, rub lengthwise
until the surface of the wood is smooth and the piece feels like a
cylinder when revolved in the hand.
59. The Spokeshave.—Fig. 112. The spokeshave is used
principally to smooth curved surfaces. It
may be drawn toward or pushed away from the worker, whichever is
more convenient. By means of screws, the blade may be adjusted to
take light or heavy shavings. The spokeshave is practically a short
plane with handles at the sides, and in using it the aim should be, as
with the plane, to secure silky shavings of as great length as the
nature of the work will allow.

Fig. 112.

60. Making Curved Edges.—To make curved edges on a board,

finger-gage on each side lines which
shall indicate the amount of curvature. Fig. 113.

Fig. 113.

If the curve is to be a gradual one reaching from one of these lines

over the middle of the edge to the other two lines should also be
finger-gaged on the edge. Finger-gage from each side using a
distance equal to one-fourth the whole thickness of the piece.

Fig. 114. Fig. 115.

With the spokeshave, Fig. 114, carefully cut off the two arrises to
the pencil lines so as to form two bevels. This gives three surfaces to
the edge of the board. Estimating the amount with the eye, cut off
the two arrises formed by these three surfaces until five equal
surfaces are formed in their place. This process may be repeated
until the surface of the edge is practically a curved surface. With a
piece of sandpaper held as shown in Fig. 115, rub until the surface is
smooth and evenly curved.
61. Modeling.—This term is used to apply to the method of
making objects of such irregular form that the
judgment of the worker must be depended upon to give the correct
result without the aid of gage and knife marks. The forming of a
canoe paddle or a hammer handle are good illustrations.
 Fig. 116.

Generally a little forethought will show a way in which the piece of

work may be partly laid out with knife, square and rule. To illustrate,
take the hammer handle, Fig. 116. The steps would be as follows:
First, plane a face side and a face edge, and square the two ends so
that the piece shall have the length desired for the finished handle.
Second, draw a center line on the face side, parallel to the face edge
and lay off on either side of this the two straight lines which shall
indicate the amount of taper; also sketch in the lines of curvature.
Plane the two edges to the tapering lines and square with the face
side. Then cut to the curved lines, keeping this surface also square
with the face side. In a similar manner, lay off on the face edge a
center line parallel to the face side, mark the taper and lines of
curvature, and work these surfaces as in the second step. Third, the
piece may be laid off still further by drawing on the larger end the
form of the ellipse which that end is to assume. With spokeshave,
judging the curves of the middle with the eye, work out the desired
form. The steel scraper is to be used for finishing after the piece has
been made as smooth as is possible with the spokeshave.
 CHAPTER VII.
1. Laying Out Duplicate Parts. 2. Scraping and

Sandpapering. 3. Fastening Parts.

62. Laying out Duplicate Parts.—Frequently a piece of work will

require the making of two or more
like parts. To lay out these parts, that is, to mark out the location of
intended gains, mortises, shoulders of tenons, etc., so that all shall
be alike, the following method is used: (1) On the face edge of one of
the pieces measure off with the rule and mark with knife the points at
which the lines for the joints are to be squared across. If knife marks
would show on the finished surface as scratches, use a sharp pencil
instead. (2) Lay the pieces on the bench top with the face edges up;
even the ends with the try-square. Fig. 117. Square lines across the
edges of all of them at the points previously marked on one of them.
The pieces may then be separated and lines corresponding to the
lines just made on the face edges, be carried across the face sides
of each piece separately, the try-square beam being held against the
face edge in so doing, of course.
 Fig. 117.

In all duplicate work the aim of the worker should be to make as

much use as possible of the tool he has in hand before laying it
down and taking another. To illustrate, if there should be a number of
like parts each requiring two different settings of the gage, he should
mark all of the parts at the first setting, then all at the second setting
rather than to change the gage for each piece so that each piece
might be completely marked before another is begun.
63. Scraping.—In smoothing hard wood surfaces, a scraper will
be found helpful. If the grain should happen to be
crossed or curled, a scraper will become a necessity. The plane-iron
may be made ever so sharp and the cap-iron set ever so close to the
cutting edge, still the surface of some woods will tear. Sandpaper
must not be depended upon to smooth a torn surface.

Fig. 118.

Cabinet scrapers for plane and convex surface work are

rectangular pieces of saw steel. Fig. 118 shows a swan-neck scraper
suitable for smoothing concave surfaces.
Beginners frequently mistake surfaces which have been planed at
a mill for smooth surfaces. They are not; and, unless the “hills and
hollows” which extend across the surface of every mill-planed piece
of lumber are removed before the finish of stain or filler is applied,
the result will be very unsatisfactory.
These “hills and hollows” are present even in the smoothest of
mill-plane surfaces. The reason is easily understood. When a board
is mill-planed, it is run through a machine which has a flat bed over
which the board is moved and above which revolve two knives. Fig.
119. Unless the grain of wood is very badly crossed or curled, it will
be found very much easier, and time will be saved if the mill marks
are removed with a smooth-plane before the scraper is applied.
 A—Delivery Roller. D—Roller. G—Work Table.
B—Cutter Head. E—Roller. H—Knives.
C—Feed Roller. F—Board.

Fig. 119.

Scrapers may be pushed or pulled. Fig. 120. When properly

sharpened thin silky shavings will be cut off. The cutting edge of a
scraper is a bur which is formed at an arris and turned at very nearly
a right angle to the surface of the scraper.
 Fig. 120. Fig. 121.

When a scraper becomes dull (1) each edge is drawfiled, Fig. 121,
so as to make it square and straight, with the corners slightly
rounded. Sometimes the edges are rounded slightly from end to end
to prevent digging. Frequently the scraper has its edges and
surfaces ground square on an oilstone after the drawfiling that the
arrises may be formed into smoother burs. (2) After filing, the
scraper is laid flat on the bench and the arrises forced over as in Fig.
122. The tool used is called a burnisher; any smooth piece of steel
would do. (3) Next, turn these arrises back over the side of the
scraper. Fig. 123. Great pressure is not necessary to form the burs
properly.

Fig. 122. Fig. 123.

 64. Sandpapering.—To know when to use and when not to use
sandpaper is as much the sign of a good
workman as to know how to use the tools.
Sandpaper should never be used until all tool work has been done
as well, and carried as far as is possible. Sandpaper is, as its name
implies, sand paper. In sanding a surface, this fine sand becomes
imbedded in the wood and should an edged tool be used thereon it
will be dulled. Slovenly work should never be done in expectation of
using sandpaper to fix it up. This practice is dishonest. Sandpaper
should not be expected to do the work of edged tools or
disappointment will follow. The sandpaper sheet, for use, is usually
divided into four parts, one of these parts being of good size for large
work.

Fig. 124.

For flat surfaces these pieces are placed on a sandpaper block.

This block is but a piece of wood squared up to a length equal to that
of the piece of paper and to such a width that the edges of the paper
will extend far enough up the edges of the block to allow the fingers
to grasp them firmly. Fig. 124. Do not waste the paper by wrapping it
around in such a way as to throw part of it on top of the block. The
block should be held flat upon the surface when sanding near an
arris, otherwise the arris will be rounded. The arrises should be kept
sharp unless on a table leg, arm of a chair or something similar, in
which the sharp arrises would be likely to injure the hand or become
splintered through usage. In such cases the sandpaper may be run
along the arrises once or twice, just enough to remove the
sharpness. Sometimes the plane is set shallow and drawn over the
arris after the surfaces have been squared, to remove the
sharpness.
On curved surfaces, the sandpaper is held free in the hand, no
block being used. Fig. 115 illustrates the manner of sanding the
convex curve of the coat hanger. The sandpaper should be rubbed
along the grain and the rubbing should proceed only long enough to
smooth the piece and to bring out the grain clearly.
On the back of a piece of sandpaper will be found a number. This
number indicates the relative coarseness of the sand sprinkled upon
the glue covered paper. 00, 0, 1, 1¹⁄₂ and 2 are the numbers
commonly used; 00 being finest and 2 relatively coarse. On table
tops and surfaces which are not very smooth to begin with, the
coarse sandpaper is first used, this is followed by the next in
coarseness and so on until the finest is used.
Never attempt to sandpaper surfaces or parts which are to be put
together later on to form joints, the edge tools alone must be
depended upon to secure proper smoothing.
65. Hammers.—Fig. 125 shows the two kinds of hammers most
commonly used by workers in wood. The plain
faced hammer has a flat face and is somewhat easier to learn to use
than the bell-faced hammer, which has a slightly rounded face. The
advantage of the bell-faced hammer lies in one’s ability to better set
a nail slightly below the surface without the assistance of the nailset.
This is a very great advantage on outside or on rough carpenter
work. This setting of the nail with the hammer leaves a slight
depression, however, in the wood, and is therefore not suited for
inside finishing.
 Fig. 125.

The handle of the hammer is purposely made quite long and

should be grasped quite near the end.
66. Nails.—Nails originally were forged by hand and were
therefore very expensive. Later strips were cut from
sheets of metal and heads were hammered upon these by means of
the blacksmith’s hammer, the vise being used to hold the strips
meanwhile. These were called cut nails. Early in the nineteenth
century a machine was invented which cut the nails from the sheet
metal and headed them.
Steel wire nails have about supplanted the cut nails for most
purposes. They are made by a machine which cuts the wire from a
large reel, points and heads the pieces thus cut off.
Wire nails, like cut nails, are roughly classed by woodworkers as
common, finishing and casing nails. Thin nails with small heads are
called brads. Wire nails are bought and sold by weight, the size of
wire according to the standard wire gage and the length in inches
being taken into consideration in specifying the size and fixing the
price per pound.
In former practice, the size of nails was specified according to the
number of pounds that one thousand of any variety would weigh.
Thus the term sixpenny and eightpenny referred to varieties which
would weigh six and eight pounds per thousand, respectively, penny
being a corruption of pound. In present practice, certain sizes are still
roughly specified as three, four, six, eight, ten, twenty and thirty
penny.

Fig. 126.

Common wire nails are thick and have large flat heads. They are
used in rough work where strength is desired. Fig. 126 A. Finishing
nails, Fig. 126 B, are used for fine work such as inside woodwork,
cabinet work, etc. Casing nails, Fig. 126 C, are somewhat thicker
and stronger than finishing nails; they have small heads.
67. Nailing.—Especial care is necessary in starting cut nails. Fig.
127 shows two views of a cut nail. From these it will be
seen that the sides of the nail form a wedge in one of the views while
in the other they are parallel. The nail should be so started that the
wedging action shall take place along, not across the grain.
 Fig. 127. Fig. 128.

In nailing through one piece into the edge of another, assume a

position so that you can look along the piece into the edge of which
you are nailing. Fig. 128. If the nail is to be driven plumb, it must be
sighted from two directions several times in the beginning of the
nailing. Having driven the points of the nails slightly below the
surface of the first piece, adjust the two pieces properly, force the