Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ebook download (Original PDF) Texas Criminal Law: Principles and Practices 2nd Edition all chapter
ebook download (Original PDF) Texas Criminal Law: Principles and Practices 2nd Edition all chapter
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-making-sense-of-
criminal-justice-policies-and-practices-2nd-edition-2/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-making-sense-of-
criminal-justice-policies-and-practices-2nd-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-information-security-
principles-and-practices-2nd-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-ashworths-principles-of-
criminal-law-9th-edition/
(eBook PDF) Principles of Criminal Law 7th Edition by
Cliff Roberson
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-principles-of-criminal-
law-7th-edition-by-cliff-roberson/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-interviewing-principles-
and-practices-15th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-welding-principles-and-
practices-5th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-criminal-law-and-
procedure-12th-edition/
http://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-digital-design-
principles-and-practices-4th/
Second Edition
Jerry L. Dowling
Contents vii
the modern statute is the name of the offense. Additionally, as appropriate, the general state of a
particular criminal offense throughout the nation is presented; for example, Chapter 5, “Criminal
Homicide,” contains a discussion of the primary methods by which other states classify criminal homi-
cides. Similarly, in Chapter 15 the rules used in other jurisdictions to determine whether a criminal
defendant was entrapped are explored. This discussion serves to broaden the reader’s perspective on
the topic of entrapment because Texas has its own unique approach to this defense, an approach out
of the mainstream of American criminal law. However, the thematic focus remains on the e lements of
the major criminal offenses and defenses in Texas as described in the Texas Penal Code.
Third, frequently statute books say one thing but the actual implementation of the law occurs
in practice in a different manner. Texas Criminal Law, where relevant, overviews the actual practices
throughout the state based on the author’s four decades of experience with the criminal justice sys-
tem. For example, the manner in which theft by check and issuance of worthless check offenses are
handled in actuality is not easily determined from only reading the relevant Penal Code sections.
Likewise, the Texas court system and the variations in the manner in which prosecutors file formal
charges are overviewed in Chapter 3. While the text is not intended to substitute for an introduction
to the Texas criminal justice system book, the day-to-day procedures used by Texas law enforce-
ment, prosecutorial, and correctional agencies are highlighted where their understanding will assist
the student of criminal law.
The reader is strongly encouraged to have at hand a current copy of the Texas Penal Code
when reading this text. While the pages of Texas Criminal Law do contain many excerpts from
Texas criminal statutes, many other important sections are not included because of space consider-
ations. Only by reading and analyzing the referenced statutes can one fully understand the content
and scope of application of the particular law being examined in this text. The appendix contains
directions on understanding the organizational structure of the Texas Penal Code and suggestions
regarding how best to read and comprehend its contents. In addition, the appendix includes helpful
suggestions on reading and briefing the court opinions that appear within the text. This material
should be reviewed prior to embarking on Chapter 1.
The style of the text is a bit more informal than traditional criminal law textbooks. A large
number of scenarios are used and much of the text is conversational in tone. In my years of teaching
the topic, I have found that many students learn best by exploring examples as opposed to discussing
abstract concepts. In much of the book, criminal law principles are presented by playing off of a
particular fact situation. Many of these factual scenarios are relevant to college-age individuals, such
as date rape or the question of when a loud party rises to the level of disorderly conduct.
The informal style found in Texas Criminal Law does not mean, however, that the content is less
than scholarly. Rather, each chapter contains a large number of references to the source of the content.
These endnotes serve several purposes. First, the endnotes establish the origin of the principles of law
and their interpretation found in the text narrative. In most instances, this is a reference to either a
particular section of the Texas Penal Code or to a Texas appellate court decision interpreting a por-
tion of the Penal Code. When constitutional issues are implicated, references to U.S. Supreme Court
cases are given. The endnotes also serve to provide parenthetical material that may be tangential to
the main content under discussion. This use of the endnote avoids a digression from the topic at hand.
However, the reader should examine this explanatory material to expand his or her understanding of
the narrative. Third, much material in the endnotes provides the reader the opportunity for further
research on the particular topic. Scholarly books, law review articles, collected annotations, and the
like are referenced for the reader who wishes to explore a particular matter in greater depth.
INSTRUCTOR SUPPLEMENTS
Instructor’s Manual with Test Bank Includes content outlines for classroom discussion, teaching
suggestions, and answers to selected end-of-chapter questions from the text. This manual also
c ontains a Word document version of the test bank.
Preface xiii
TestGen. This computerized test generation system gives you maximum flexibility in creating
and administering tests on paper, electronically, or online. It provides state-of-the-art features for
viewing and editing test bank questions, dragging a selected question into a test you are creating,
and printing sleek, formatted tests in a variety of layouts. Select test items from test banks included
with TestGen for quick test creation, or write your own questions from scratch. TestGen’s random
generator provides the option to display different text or calculated number values each time ques-
tions are used.
PowerPoint Presentations Our presentations offer clear, straightforward outlines and notes to
use for class lectures or study materials. Photos, illustrations, charts, and tables from the book are
included in the presentations when applicable.
To access supplementary materials online, instructors need to request an instructor access code. Go
to www.pearsonhighered.com/irc, where you can register for an instructor access code. Within
48 hours after registering, you will receive a confirming email, including an instructor access code. Once
you have received your code, go to the site and log on for full instructions on downloading the materials
you wish to use.
ALTERNATE VERSIONS
eBooks This text is also available in multiple eBook formats including Adobe Reader and
CourseSmart. CourseSmart is an exciting new choice for students looking to save money. As an
alternative to purchasing the printed textbook, students can purchase an electronic version of the
same content. With a CourseSmart eTextbook, students can search the text, make notes online,
print out reading assignments that incorporate lecture notes, and bookmark important passages
for later review. For more information, or to purchase access to the CourseSmart eTextbook, visit
www.coursesmart.com.
Professor Jerry L. Dowling, J.D.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to acknowledge the many who assisted personally or through emotional
support in the creation of this text. First are the reviewers who provided critiques and suggestions
that helped in making the book a better, more useful classroom text. Thanks to Douglas Shuler at
Paris Junior College and Chris Carmean at Houston Community College.
Second, I would be remiss in not acknowledging the support provided by Sam Houston State
University. Access to the university library’s legal holdings and electronic databases was crucial
to the successful completion of the text. Of special note is the opportunity to write a substantial
portion of the text while on faculty development leave from the College of Criminal Justice. This
leave was made possible to a large degree through the support of former SHSU Provost and Vice
President for Academic Affairs David E. Payne and the former Dean of the College of Criminal
Justice Richard H. Ward. To both, I owe thanks.
Senior Acquisitions Editor Gary Bauer and the staff at Pearson deserve special recognition for
their patience and direction in the development and production of this textbook.
A major thanks goes out to the hundreds of Texas peace officers and SHSU undergraduates
who I have had the pleasure of training and teaching about criminal law in my three decades resid-
ing in the state. Not a class meeting or training session occurred where the students did not educate
me as well. The teacher becomes better because of the insights provided by the students.
Finally, a special thanks goes to my family and friends, and especially to my wife, Katherine,
for their encouragement, tolerance, support, and most importantly patience during the writing of
this text.
xiv
About the Author
Jerry L. Dowling is Professor Emeritus of Criminal Justice at Sam Houston State University,
Huntsville, Texas. He has taught courses on criminal law, criminal procedure, and other law-based
courses at both the undergraduate and graduate levels at SHSU for over 40 years. During the same
period, he has c onducted numerous legal training sessions for Texas peace officers, police chiefs,
and sheriffs. He holds the Doctor of Jurisprudence degree from the College of Law at the University
of Tennessee. Prior to becoming a university teacher, Professor Dowling served as a Special Agent of
the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
xv
This page intentionally left blank
▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪
1
Foundations of Criminal Law
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After reading this chapter, the student will be able to:
1. Explain the four attributes of a crime.
2. Identify the sources of American criminal law.
3. Explain the ways to classify crime.
4. Identify and explain the six statutory purposes of the Texas Penal Code.
5. Identify and explain the practical and legal limitations on the creation of criminal laws.
6. Identify and explain the criminal jurisdiction of the State of Texas.
BOLO
The reader should be on the lookout (BOLO) for the meaning of the following terms. Knowledge of the mean-
ing of these terms will greatly assist the reader in understanding the primary elements of the chapter.
Alcalde General deterrence theory Retribution
Breach of the peace Incapacitation Specific deterrence
Civil violation Malum in se Stare decisis
Codification movement Malum prohibitum Substantive criminal law
Common Law of England Misdemeanor Territorial jurisdiction
Crime Model Penal Code Texas Penal Code
Crimes involving moral Preemption doctrine Treason
turpitude Principle of legality Void-for-vagueness doctrine
Ex post facto law Procedural criminal law
Felony Rehabilitation
INTRODUCTION
This text examines the substantive criminal law in Texas. Substantive criminal law concerns the defini-
tions of crimes and their penalties, in contrast to procedural criminal law, which focuses on the imple-
mentation of the criminal sanction through the laws of arrest, search, seizure, and confessions, and the
courtroom rules of evidence. While some overlap exists between the two categories of criminal law (e.g.,
Entrapment is a statutory defense, but pre-trial police procedures influence whether or not the defense will
be available to an accused.), an understanding of each is necessary to fully appreciate the legal complexities
of the state,s modern justice system. Knowledge of the kinds of behavior that are condemned by society as
highly undesirable, and thereby deemed criminal, forms one of the cornerstones of the study of criminol-
ogy and criminal justice.
1
2 Chapter 1 • Foundations of Criminal Law
Virtually everyone has a basic notion of what is legal and what is illegal. This knowl-
edge comes from being reared in a particular society, with its culture, customs, religions, and
value s ystems being imprinted from birth. Additionally, mass media—particularly televi-
sion and motion pictures—imprint citizens with ideas about society’s rules concerning crime
and punishment.
For the average citizen, such indoctrination likely provides enough guidance to be a pro-
ductive member of society. One can function reasonably well knowing that stealing is unlawful,
driving while intoxicated is dangerous and illegal, and engaging in sexual relations without the
consent of the other person is subject to criminal prosecution. For the student of the American
criminal justice system, such a cursory understanding is far from sufficient. Individuals who
seek to work in the justice system must possess a clear understanding of the criminal law in
both theory and application. Indeed, many veteran justice professionals are more knowledgeable
about the criminal law than most attorneys, the bulk of whom rarely engage in this specialized
area of legal practice. The need for an in-depth understanding of criminal law is particularly
acute for police officers who frequently must make the initial determination of whether or not
cause exists to believe a crime has been committed. Likewise, individuals employed in commu-
nity supervision, probation, parole, and institutional correctional agencies should possess an
understanding of the criminal sanction. Their daily work exists because of substantive criminal
law. Appreciating the rules and foundations of criminal law places their job in the larger context
of the justice system.
Study of American criminal law is complicated by a single fact: While there exists a great
commonality in the core definition of crimes from state to state, subtle and sometimes very
important variations also exist. These variations may range from labeling, such as whether
taking someone’s property without consent is called “larceny” or “theft,” up to whether the con-
duct itself is even declared unlawful—public intoxication, for example. While the broad princi-
ples of criminal law operate in every state, one needs to examine a specific jurisdiction’s criminal
code to determine exactly what conduct is sanctioned and the nature of the penalty assessed for
a violation.
Under our federal system of government, every state has enacted its own set of criminal
laws, usually called the penal code, criminal code, or something similar.1 Further, a separate
criminal code exists for the District of Columbia and the armed forces, as well the federal govern-
ment. Thus, more than 50 possible definitions of murder, robbery, rape, and disorderly conduct
exist.2 As a consequence, creation of a single text that is useful and accurate for every jurisdiction
is virtually impossible.
This text focuses on the substantive criminal law of the State of Texas. While it is anticipated
that the reader will be either a student in a Texas college, a cadet in a Texas police training facility, or
simply a Texan interested in the topic, Texas law serves as an excellent guide for understanding the
criminal law not only of the state but also of the nation as well. The Texas Penal Code is a modern
compilation of criminal laws. It is generally reflective of the contemporary thinking of criminal law
scholars and policy makers. The code does not contain archaic or oddball statutes that have long
outlived their usefulness. Both the definitions of offenses and the punishment ranges are reflective
of current criminological thought. Indeed, one group of legal scholars has ranked the Texas Penal
Code as the top compilation of criminal law in the United States.3 Credit for this can largely be
laid at the feet of the drafters of the Model Penal Code, which greatly influenced the content and
structure of the Texas Penal Code, and the nearly 100 individuals and organizations who worked for
eight years to update Texas’s criminal laws.
In 1931, the American Law Institute (ALI), an organization of judges, lawyers, and legal schol-
ars, proposed the development of a comprehensive penal code that state legislatures could use as a
guide in the revision of their criminal laws. It was not until 1962, however, after 13 tentative drafts,
that the prototype code was published. ALI’s Model Penal Code has served as a basis for the revision
of the criminal codes of many states, including Texas.4
Chapter 1 • Foundations of Criminal Law 3
Using the Model Penal Code as a basis, a committee of the State Bar of Texas in 1965 began
the work of revising the then existing 1925 Penal Code. The State Bar undertook the revision effort
because, as the chair of the revision committee noted, “The existing Texas Penal Code is a bulky,
confusing, and conflicting compilation of the original Texas Penal Code of 1856 plus additions and
amendments. The accumulation of 110 years of legislation today [1967] rests uneasily upon a foun-
dation laid twenty-one years after the Texas Revolution.”5 A draft of a proposed new penal code was
presented to the Texas Legislature in 1970, but lawmakers waited until 1973 to take action.6 This
1973 Texas Penal Code, with some modifications over the intervening years, contains the primary
criminal offenses for the state.
Interestingly, most states, including Texas, do not specifically define crime in their respective
penal codes, but rather only present the elements of behavior that constitute a specific offense, such
as murder, robbery, burglary, and the like. This lack of definition is understandable since one is
prosecuted for a particular offense, not for engaging in criminal conduct.
Whichever definition—or nondefinition—one prefers, scholars generally agree that the
concept of crime contains several important attributes that distinguish it from other aspects of the
law. These elements are the following:
• Government defines the illegal conduct.
• Government is the victim.
• Government prosecutes the case.
• Judgment is payable to the government.
Attributes of a Crime
Government Defines the Illegal Conduct Crimes are created by a governmental
body, which means that Congress, in the case of federal criminal law, and state and local l egislative
bodies, such as the Texas Legislature or a city council, formally pass a bill barring (or in rare
instances, requiring) certain behavior by the citizenry and providing a penalty for noncompli-
ance. This principle of legality is expressed by the Latin phrase nullum crimen sine lege (no crime
without law). This requirement, while somewhat obvious, is nonetheless quite important. Suppose,
one July 4th evening about 9 p.m. a police officer is called to the scene of a party at your apart-
ment complex. You and other revelers are frolicking about the swimming pool, dancing to recorded
music, drinking beer, and otherwise enjoying yourselves. A few of the revelers are shooting fire-
works. Which of these behaviors is a crime? Maybe all; maybe none. If the music is so loud it
disturbs the peace, then disorderly conduct is being committed. If the partiers are underage, a
violation of the alcoholic beverage laws may be occurring. However, the officer determines that
the audio player’s sound level is not excessive, and everyone at the pool appears to be an adult. But,
what if the apartment manager has posted a rule at the pool that prohibits electrical devices (the CD
player), hazardous objects (the fireworks), and alcoholic beverages (the beer) at the poolside? No
criminal law violation has occurred! The apartment manager as part of the lease, or in establishing
“house rules,” can certainly bar alcohol and fireworks at the poolside or limit the hours for the use
of the pool. However, the rules violations by the party participants are not contrary to the state or
local criminal law because the rules, even though they may well help maintain social order within
the apartment complex, were not enacted by a governmental body. The rules violations could result
in termination of the participants’ apartment leases, a ban on the use of the pool, or some other
sanction by the apartment manager, but the conduct is not criminal as no government-enacted
statute is violated.
This concept that only a governmental entity with lawmaking authority can create crimi-
nal law has become increasingly relevant in suburban Texas. Recent decades have seen the rise of
planned residential communities, often outside the incorporated limits of a city. In order to make the
lands attractive to potential residents, land use is often limited through so-called deed restrictions.
These land use restrictions are enforced through a community association in which each resident is
a member. While these restrictions often concern home design criteria, lot size, and the like, they
may also place limits on certain other aspects of life—for example, no hunting, no fireworks, and
no powerboats on community lakes. Violation of these restrictions is not a crime, but a civil matter.
Accordingly, peace officers will not normally enforce these rules. Rather, habitual violators will be
subject to civil suit by the owners’ association.
Both federal and state authorities have also used this criminal/non-criminal distinction
to advantage. At the federal level, many violations of the Internal Revenue Code can result in a
civil penalty. On the immigration front, illegal entry into the country is deemed not to be a crime
but to be a civil violation, which normally imposes a monetary fine but none of the collateral
consequences that occur with a criminal conviction. Classification of immigration law violations as
Chapter 1 • Foundations of Criminal Law 5
merely civil has created a circumstance in which most local law enforcement agencies will not arrest
an undocumented alien solely based on their immigration status because the illegal entry is not a
criminal violation.
On the local level, in recent years many communities in and out of Texas have installed red
light cameras. These devices photographically record motor vehicle operators who fail to stop at
a red traffic signal. The resultant photos are reviewed by a police officer, and the vehicle operator
is frequently mailed a traffic citation for the red light violation. In authorizing such a procedure,
the Texas Legislature pointedly declared that any violation was a civil matter and not a criminal
conviction, even though a monetary penalty was assessed for the violation.10
Government Is the Victim of Crime As odd as it may initially seem, when Joe Smith
punches Roger Jones in the nose, Roger’s nose may bleed, but it is the State of Texas that is offended.
A governmental body enacts the criminal law for the benefit of society as a whole, not solely for
the benefit of potential individual victims. While the government may hold broad responsibility
for the safety and well-being of the citizenry, it does not normally have legal responsibility for the
misfortunes that befall an individual. Consequently, when a criminal law is violated, the interests
of society as a whole are impacted. This principle is manifested in the justice system in several
ways. First, all criminal prosecutions are filed in the name of the state. A criminal charge based
on the previous example will be styled State of Texas v. Smith. This stylistic form emphasizes that
the action is being brought in the name of the State of Texas. Other jurisdictions follow the same
principle, although slightly different terminology may be used. For example, criminal charges in
California are styled People of the State of California v. Smith while the federal system uses United
States v. Smith.
Second, Texas statutes specify that many legal documents ranging from charge complaints to
indictments conclude with the specific phrase “against the peace and dignity of the state.”11 The Texas
Constitution requires this phrase to appear in all indictments.12 The phrase, which has been ruled to
be absolutely mandatory, reinforces the principle that it is the public, through its government, that is
offended by the criminal behavior.13
Finally, the notion that the sovereign is the victim permits the government to proceed with
a prosecution even with a missing or reluctant complainant. Obviously, no living complainant is
needed in order for the state to initiate a murder prosecution. The rule is generally no different for
other offenses. Likewise, even if a human victim does not wish to pursue the matter, the state may
still file charges. A district attorney may accede to a victim’s wishes to drop charges, particularly
if the case is minor and the testimony of the victim is the primary evidence, but this decision is
based more on practicality than on law. For example, increasingly prosecutors are filing charges in
domestic violence cases even when the victim of the abuse wants the charges dropped. The notion
being that prosecution of all domestic assaults will have a deterring effect on future acts of house-
hold violence.
On the other hand, the public prosecutor (e.g., district attorney) also has the absolute authority
to decide not to prosecute a case. Just as a victim has no legal power to demand a charge be dismissed,
the victim likewise lacks any legal authority to initiate formal court prosecution. The prosecutor pos-
sesses the sole legal discretion to vigorously pursue a case or to totally drop the matter, irrespective of
the victim’s wishes. Not even the courts can force the prosecution of a case that the district attorney
declines to pursue.
ro-British prosecutor, while the people of Boston raised money to pay for a second prosecu-
p
tor who was pro-colonists. Today, society recognizes the desirability of a governmental officer
performing the prosecutorial function. As previously noted, the public prosecutor holds broad
discretion as to which cases to pursue and which to drop. While a prosecutor may confer with
the victim prior to accepting a plea bargain offer or a court may order a victim impact study be
conducted before considering sentencing, the human victim has little direct control over the
sanction a defendant receives.
Many persons believe that the human victim of a crime should have a stronger voice in the
prosecutorial process. As a result, Texas, along with many other states, has enacted victim rights
laws. Additionally, a victim rights constitutional amendment is gaining political support. The Texas
victims’ rights statute requires notice of case status, court dates, parole hearings, and the like be
given to the victims of certain violent crimes. The statute permits the victim to provide input to
the pre-sentencing investigation. Despite the expanded rights of crime victims, the district attorney
retains the power to control the overall prosecutorial process.15
The government also absorbs the expense of investigating and prosecuting criminal offenses,
although court costs are often assessed against a guilty defendant. Collection of these costs occurs
most often in misdemeanor cases but rarely after a felony conviction, as most felons either lack the
resources to pay or have little fear of the consequences of not paying.
Judgment Is Payable to the Government The government also extracts the penalty
from the guilty on behalf of society. A convicted defendant may be incarcerated or fined for his
offense, and in a few instances sentenced to death. Often the human victim of the crime—the home-
owner whose residence was burglarized or the driver whose car was stolen—receives nothing as
part of the sentencing of the defendant. All fines and other costs are payable to the government and
society as a whole through its governmental entities funds the cost of incapacitating the offender or
overseeing his or her probation.
stop sign and collides with another vehicle may be sued for monetary damages as well as face
a criminal citation. At the other end of the spectrum, wealthy or high profile individuals who
commit offenses—particularly crimes against the person—may find themselves subject not
only to criminal prosecution but also to civil suit. A famous example is the 1995 prosecution of
former football star and actor O.J. Simpson for the murder of his ex-wife and her acquaintance.
Simpson was found not guilty of the criminal offense, but he was sued a year later on behalf
of the ex-wife’s estate and by the parents of the dead acquaintance for the tort of wrongful
death. A multimillion dollar monetary judgment was rendered against him. Since the standard
of proof in a civil suit is less than that required in a criminal case, the two verdicts are not legally
inconsistent. Professional basketball superstar Kobe Bryant suffered a similar fate following
allegations of sexual assault in 2003. Rape charges were dropped when the victim became reluc-
tant to pursue the matter, but Bryant reportedly made a financial settlement of a civil suit filed
by his accuser.16
provided a template for the American legal system. In this country’s formative years, whenever a dis-
pute arose over whether certain behavior constituted a crime, for example, American officials would
refer to the crimes known to the Common Law. In fact, many states after the American Revolution
adopted the Common Law crimes as their penal code, initially leaving the definitions of crimes in
their unwritten form.
For some states, such as Florida,18 the unwritten Common Law crimes are considered still
to be in force today when they do not conflict with an offense enacted by the legislature. In these
jurisdictions, a violation of one of the unwritten Common Law offenses is normally a misde-
meanor. A few states (e.g., North Carolina) rely exclusively on statutory crimes, but utilize the
Common Law to provide definitions for the elements of some of the statutory offenses. Thus,
a North Carolina statute declares burglary illegal, but the courts must use the Common Law
definition to determine the elements of the offense.19 Most other states, including Texas, have
by statute explicitly abolished the Common Law crimes altogether, declaring that only offenses
enacted by their respective legislatures are punishable. The federal government, because of its
organic structure, does not enforce the unwritten Common Law crimes.20 But, even in the over-
whelming majority of jurisdictions where the old Common Law crimes are no longer enforced,
the underlying principles of the old English law serve as the primary influence on both the
substantive and procedural criminal law. In Texas, while the Common Law offenses are not part
of the penal law, Common Law rules of court procedure remain in place if not abrogated or
modified by statute.21
Codification Movement
Despite the early adoption of the Common Law crimes, all states subsequently became active
in passing legislation that clearly spelled out in written form the elements of criminal offenses,
so confusion and ambiguity would be minimized. Additionally, by the mid-nineteenth century
a national movement developed to codify all laws, meaning collecting statutes of like topics and
placing them together in organized topical volumes called codes.24 Texas was an early participant
in this codification movement. The state legislature abolished the Common Law crimes and
adopted its first comprehensive written penal code in 1856.25 This “Old Code,” as it is known,
served as the basis of Texas criminal law for nearly 120 years!