Professional Documents
Culture Documents
_OceanofPDF.com_Seeing_Through_The_Singularity_-_Douglas_Haugen
_OceanofPDF.com_Seeing_Through_The_Singularity_-_Douglas_Haugen
SINGULARITY:
UNCOVERING THE COSMIC CONSPIRACY
by Douglas Haugen
TO MY DAUGHTER
Lilyann Rose Haugen
OceanofPDF.com
FOREWARD
With every generation there arises a new paradigm which promises to lift
the human condition out of the confines of its sinful nature, into a utopian
kingdom through the evolution and deification of man. The year 1987 saw
the first organized “Harmonic Convergence,” an attempt to bring about a
critical mass singularity of Christ consciousness through peaceful
meditation and heavenly alignment on a global scale. Like those before
them, the prophets of the emerging order failed miserably and continue to
stumble in their pride against the Creator. After receiving Jesus Christ as the
Son of God and Savior from sin, this event which I had attended – along
with a Biblical study on the reality of spiritual warfare – became the
springboard for my own research and investigation into the powers behind
the system, both earthly and spiritual.
In Seeing through the Singularity, Douglas Haugen takes the reader on a
journey from the Garden of Eden, through the dialectical systems of
collective mind control, up to the age of human technological
transformation; what Haugen defines as a “constant rebranding of the New
Age movement” through gnostic, kabbalistic and scientific methods of
manipulation and sorcery. This current externalizing of spiritual forces upon
the psyche of society is the culmination of a luciferian elite group bent upon
inverting the set order of God and reversing the curse placed upon the
serpent and those who follow him. Walking in the footsteps of the fallen
ones who “left their first estate,” they are the embodiment of the blind
leading the blind towards a new Tower of Babel. By contrasting Scripture
with in depth research, author Douglas Haugen shows us that the Word of
God, the logos, who is Jesus Christ, is our only source and the key to seeing
through the blinding mist of the singularity which Satan has offered
mankind from the Garden of Eden to this day.
~ DeAnne Loper
OceanofPDF.com
INTRODUCTION
TRAVELING CONCEPTS:
Singularity: the point at which the natural and supernatural unite; the
singleness of consciousness; post-human or eternal life.
Cosmic Consciousness: concerns a higher form of consciousness than that
possessed by the ordinary man; the extraterrestrial vastness of the universe
in contrast to the earth alone.
Inversion: the condition of being turned inside out, or the process of
reversing relative positions.
The Campaign of Armageddon: the construction of an alternative reality
that directs consciousness toward an apocalyptic destination.
Egregore: the metaphysical invocation of a thought form that assumes an
independent power over the human population.
BIOPOLITICS
The term biopolitics denotes the politics of life (Greek: bios),3 that
ultimately seeks to have unlimited physical, mental, and spiritual control
over the human population, through largely covert means and practices.
Michel Foucault says, “Biopolitics is the study of life, which is neither the
basis nor the object of politics.”4 Instead, it presents a border to politics, one
that is natural but also artificial and transformable. Life that is
transformable “signals the entry of phenomena peculiar to the life of the
human species into the order of knowledge and power, into the sphere of
political techniques.”5
Biopolitics frames a system of control that drives the human population
inexorably toward singularity, i.e., post-humanity. Foucault notes that since
the 18th century, political authorities have taken on the task of the
management of life in the name of the well-being of the population.6
However, during the 20th century, new configurations of control took
shape; contemporary biopolitics has become molecular politics,7 that is
digital, mechanic, and concerns virtual life.8 In fact, scholars now locate the
wish to control the biological makeup of the population at the very heart of
modernity. According to this line of scholarship, population purification
(including the creation of artificial life) is immanent within the very project
of biopolitics: to manage the health of the “body politic” inescapably
requires the control and elimination of “foreign bodies,” and the creation of
new ones. Hence, biopolitics ultimately denotes a politics that defines life
as something that must be securitized and potentially eliminated.9
Biopolitics, in this sense, moves the human population toward
superintelligence and ultimately onto post-human singularity—with
concerns of life-prolonging and mind enhancing measures,10 which
conceive of those life processes as the object of politics.11 These concerns
are both ancient and modern. Giorgio Agamben,12 Michael Hardt, and
Antonio Negri13 offer reformulations of biopolitics based upon premodern
sovereign power, as well as concepts of molecular politics, thanatopolitics,
and political anthropology, including ideas of “biosociality,” and
“ethopolitics.”14
Our objective is twofold: First, to provide a conceptualization of
“singularity” within the larger project of biopolitics.15 Second, to identify an
operative solidarity between biopolitics, biblical theology, and theosophy
(specifically Kabbalah). Our thesis is that the correspondence of these
approaches leads us to the center of the cosmic conspiracy, and the
prophetic posthuman destiny of man. We conclude that biopolitical
practices, in conjunction with Kabbalah, are ultimately directed toward the
inversion of the cosmic order through the inversion of logos.16
OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER 2: THOUSAND POINTS OF LIGHT
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. The earth was
without form, and void; and darkness was on the face of the deep. And
God said, Let there be light: and there was light. And God saw the
light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.
—Genesis 1: 1-4
The biblical concept of cosmic order was made manifest in the creation
account of Genesis and John 1:1-5:
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and
the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All
things were made by him; and without him was not any thing
made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of
men. And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness
comprehended it not.53
Wolfgang Smith argues that while the inverted thought form of creation has
come to dominate our universities, “the evolutionist thesis has become more
stringently unthinkable than ever before.” He explains:
A growing number of respectable scientists are defecting from the
evolutionist camp... moreover, for the most part these “experts”
have abandoned Darwinism, not on the basis of religious faith or
biblical persuasions, but on strictly scientific grounds, and in some
instances, regretfully.54
Increasingly, those defecting from the evolutionary camp cite past history,
specifically, the tragic connections between Darwinism and past invocations
for a “New World Order.”55
While many are aware that adversarial forces are forming a world
government (New World Order) which plan to rule from modern Israel
through the coming Jewish Messiah—an inverted version of John 1:1 (the
Antichrist). What most citizens, especially Christians, do not know is that
the apostate Church will not only be a partner in this New World Order, but
is even now working toward its creation. “Evangelical churches will be the
chief instrument to bring the New World Order to birth.”57 The political,
ideological, and spiritual entities that will ignite the “thousand points of
light” (Kabbalah—raising of the sparks) is Communitarianism.
COMMUNITARIANISM: BIOPOLITICS & SINGULARITY
Communitarianism employs biopolitics to consummate the “final
synthesis.” Communitarianism is a “Third Way” compromise between
Capitalism and Communism. It is not Fascism, nor is it Communism. It is a
synthesis of these opposing ideologies. It draws government-business
partnerships from Fascism and employs group decision-making from
Communism. Communitarianism will resemble a corporate state (Fascism)
in which political elites work under capitalist rules to continue generating
wealth while the working class is controlled by Communist model laws.
The Communitarian synthesis incorporates not only elements of Fascism
and Communism, but also Globalism.58
An example of the fusion that will lead to a thousand points of light is the
executive order signed by President Barack Obama that established the
White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships,
February 5, 2009—intended to work on behalf of Americans committed to
improving their communities, no matter their religious or political beliefs. It
is a partnership of nonprofits and community organizations, both secular
and faith based: that looks for ways to make a bigger impact in their
communities, learn their obligations under the law, cut through red tape,
and make the most of what the federal government has to offer.59
Obama’s reason for establishing (invoking) this solution was because he
believed that our problems require an ‘all hands on deck’ approach, and that
the federal government should enlist “effective faith-based and community
groups to help solve them.”60
According to Niki Raapana, co-founder of the Anti-Communitarian League,
“The leader of the unheralded transition to a Communitarian system in the
U.S. is the Israeli Zionist founder of the Communitarian Network, Dr.
Amitai Etzioni.” Amitai Etzioni, born Werner Falk, is a former member of
the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the founder of American
Communitarianism, the founder and director of the Communitarian
Network, and possibly the most influential man in American politics
today.61
According to Amitai Etzioni, “Nationalism must be ended. It is a creed that
has come to burden the expansion of Globalism.”62 The Communitarian
agenda is to “eliminate all nations and establish an all-powerful, central
global government.”63 Etzioni’s new communitarian egregore (thought
form) is an invocation of “community spirit” based upon Talmud, Hegel,
and the theosophical ideas expressed by Madame Blavatsky and Aleister
Crowley. Communitarian legal theory is based upon the Talmud and
Kabbalah.64
Kabbalah, and other new age instructors, now openly invoke an ultimate
light being. Said another way, One Thousand Points of Light is a global
invocation based upon “community oriented” principles.65 The project
employs biopolitics (control over bodies, minds, and spirits) in order to
direct mankind’s universal aspiration into one light (singularity).
According to Niki Raapana, “the theory of Communitarianism has its own
Law, its own guru, its own theoretical basis, and another set of laws based
on the Talmud.”66 These theories and practices are being taught to American
lawyers and judges at the Judaic Law Institute in Washington D.C.;
Communitarian and Talmudic Law are to supersede all other national and
religious laws.67
Meanwhile, Israel has developed a system of courts for non-Jews adhering
to the Seven Laws of Noah.68 The Noahide Laws correspond with the
Talmud and the Sephirot or path of initiation taught in the Kabbalah.
Raapana notes, “The seven Noahide commandments … are arranged in the
sefirotic structure familiar to students of Kabbalah … ”69 The Sefirotic
structure is called the Kabbalist “Tree of Life,” which attempts to unify or
transcend the cosmic order.70
The Noahide Laws will be administered by a restored Sanhedrin.
“[Archaeologist Dr. Vendyl Jones] worked with the Sanhedrin to establish a
system of courts for non-Jews adhering to the Seven Laws of Noah, which
the Torah obligates all of humanity to follow.”71 One of those laws is to
establish courts of justice. A high court has been established by the
Sanhedrin for such purposes, and a subsidiary of that court will soon be
established in the United States.72 In 1991, Chabad-Lubavitch in
cooperation with President Bush established the observance of Education
Day, USA [Public Law 102—14 H..J. Res. 104]: (March 20, 1991), “to
return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven
Noahide Laws.”73 President Trump also signed the observation, after which
it was reported:
In an ancient and honored Jewish custom, the nascent Sanhedrin
sent a letter to the new leader of the U.S., President Donald Trump,
blessing him and calling on him to take the lead in restoring
America and the world. The Sanhedrin also called on the new
president to acknowledge and uphold the Seven Noahide laws.74
OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER 3: THE VIEW FROM NOWHERE
And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after
their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his
kind: and God saw that it was good.
—Genesis 1:25
God saw that it was good. His creation, intention, and cosmic order was
good. Until the 19th century, species were believed to be fixed; they were
understood to be good, existing as they were, within a particular creation,
intention, and order. Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species (1859) was, in the
words of Gertrude Himmelfarb, “the cataclysm that broke up the crust of
conventional opinion,” not only about the fixity of species, but about the
need for a new politics of science.78
The cataclysm resulted from Darwin’s proposition that species developed
within a “struggle for existence,” and only organisms best adapted to their
environment would succeed in rearing offspring, while those less fit would
die off. The variants most suited to their environment would predominate,
and over time this would result in the emergence of new species.79
The egregore80 (thought form) behind The Origins of Species implied the
possibility of human mutability, outlined within a simple mechanism by
which the transmutation of species could occur: “it was objective, it could
be seen at work; it could be tested by experiment; it could be extended by
observation.”81 Predicted as it were, upon the assumption that
transmutation of species could transcend and reorder what was good:
creation, intention, and cosmic order.
C.S. Lewis observes the revolutionary shift in man’s perspective, away
from his concern for the ethical, rhetorical, and juristic, toward a new
scientific order. He notes, “Science became the business of man when man
became the business of science: when Watt applied himself to the invention
of the steam engine and Darwin to the ancestry of mankind.”82
It was this revolution, “when man became the business of science,” that
resurrected the ancient spiritual impulse to invert and transcend the cosmic
order. In this respect, I argue, it became a spiritual cult within politics,
fundamentally messianic, with aims to 1): harness technology toward the
“improvement of the soul,”83 and to 2): rearrange the social order through
the inversion of logos, in order to bring the cosmos into singularity.84
Darwin’s Origin of Species (1859) would serve as the Rosetta Stone for
these aims. The possibility of human transmutation would wake the human
imagination and revolutionize politics, Harold Laski remarks:
We are beginning nowadays to apply scientific formulae to
national problems. The statesman, somewhat to his surprise, has
discovered that they have political value. It is by the standard of
the man of science that the legislation of the future will be tested,
and political theories have undergone a profound change since the
acceptance of Darwinian conceptions.85
The egregore of this new science began to show potency in the decades
following the publication of The Origin of Species (1859). Large portions of
the public began to embrace Galton’s movement, and to adhere to the
beliefs that species were not comprised of unalterable lineages but instead
could change, depending on which genes were passed on to the next
generation.94
In addition, Galton’s movement began to adopt a theistic character, most
forcefully highlighted by his original hope of redeeming mankind from
original sin, so that it would “become part of the religion of the future.”95
Along with the potential for “race” redemption, there was the potential to
transcend and unify the entire cosmic order, in order to “bring the human
form and character a trifle nearer to the divine.”96 Karl Pearson notes the
cosmic significance of Galton’s task when he equates the crusade of
eugenics with “Holy War,” elevating it from a science into a sanctification:
Let us bear in mind the words of Galton written almost in the last
years of his life, words not of despair, but of wise caution: ‘When
the desired fullness of information shall have been acquired, then
and not till then, will be the fit moment to proclaim a “Jihad” or
Holy War against customs and prejudices that impair the physical
and moral qualities of our race.97
OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER 4: SEEING THOUGH THE VIEW
FROM NOWHERE
Man who has sprung from earth and developed through the lower
kingdoms of nature to his present rational state, has yet to complete his
evolution by becoming a god-like being and unifying his consciousness
with the Omniscient—to promote which is and always has been the sole
aim and purpose of all Initiation.
—W.L. Wilmshurst, The Meaning of Masonry
And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very
good.
—Genesis 1:31
The myth of evolution stretches back to antiquity and the ancient mystery
schools, where it closely connects to the idea that man is a being who,
though presently limited in time and space, is nevertheless capable of
achieving a great leap of being and evolving into a much more powerful
godlike being in the future. According to Manly P. Hall,
The occultists of the Ancient world had a most remarkable
understanding of the principle of evolution. They recognized all
life as being in various stages of becoming. They believed that
grains of sand were in the process of becoming human … The
ancients maintained that the universe was a great living organism,
not unlike the human body, and that every phase and function of
the universe body had a correspondence in man.108
The correspondence between the universe body, the human body, and the
processes of matter becoming divine is present in Ancient Babylon. They
demonstrate a foundational belief of evolution, as they regarded the first
creative powers “as the rude and barbaric beginnings of things, and divine
powers were produced from these first principles …”109
Greek natural philosophers were teaching primitive evolutionary concepts:
natural selection, transmigration, and reincarnation. Anaximander taught
that humans originally resembled another type of animal, such as fish.110
Democritus taught that primitive people began speaking with confused and
unintelligible sounds, but gradually they articulated words.111 The Greek
atomist Epicurus, father of contemporary materialism, taught that there was
no need for gods, for the universe came about by chance movement of
atoms, making Darwinism simply a modern gnostic myth.112
With respect to long ages, Plato taught that the present universe came about
millions of years ago,
Plato and many others of the philosophers, since they were
ignorant of the origins of all things and of that primal period at
which the world was made, said that many thousands of ages had
passed since this beautiful arrangement of the world was
completed …113
After the Greeks, Roman naturalist Pliny the Elder, said that we are subject
to chance, that “chance herself takes the place of God, she proves that God
is uncertain.”114 Greek and Roman philosophers received these ideas from
Ancient Sumerians, Egyptians, and Hindus, whose nature philosophers
extended back thousands of years before Greek and Roman civilization. For
example, one Hindu idea was that the Brahman, void, or universe
spontaneously generated itself into something like a seed or singularity
about 4.3 billion years ago, and evolved under its own power, by which it
expanded and formed all that exists. Hindus believe in an eternal universe
that has cycles of rebirth destruction and dormancy, known as calpains
rather than oscillating big bang theories.115
We also read in Hindu about the Bagbera, that the god Krishna says “I am
the source by which all creatures evolved.” In India the doctrine of
evolution, reincarnation, and karma were thoroughly established from
ancient times. It was expounded upon first in a philosophical mystic text
held to be the essence of avades. The idea that the soul reincarnates is
intricately linked to karma; the cycles pass from one plane of existence to
another and carry with them impressions from former states of being.116
Our modern version, biological evolution, describes the progress or
transmigration of energy as emerged out of a spontaneously generated
matter or chemical and its successive incarnations within the bodies of
different kinds of non-life bearing and life bearing beings over the course of
millions and billions of years.117 Its counterpart, spiritual evolution, speaks
to the progress of spirits or divine sparks that reincarnate in the bodies of
different beings over the course of millions and billions of years. In the
words of emerging church leader Rob Bell, “Evolution is energy, a spark or
electricity that everything is plugged into: the Greeks called it zoe, the
mystics called it spirit, Obi -Wan called it the Force. This energy, or spark
pulsates throughout creation and sustains it, fuels it, keeps it growing,
evolving and reproducing.”118
For mystery religion’s adepts, evolution spiritually transforms man into
superman.119 Evolution is an animated energy, serpent power, or force which
may or may not be divine, depending upon whether it is the secular
Darwinian school of thought or its spiritual counterpart. In either case, this
energy emanates from an impersonal substance from which antiquity has
named the void, chaos, ground of being, and Brahmin.
The Greek philosophy of esoteric knowledge was formulated in such a way
that the uninitiated were given a version of the teaching that was
mechanical and unspiritual. In Greek Gnosticism, the ideological division
between matter and spirit started the false division between physical and
ethereal, mechanical and mythical, scientific and religious. Gnosticism
places the material world against the spiritual, so indeed Gnosticism
contains an exoteric and esoteric meaning for everything.120
For example, modern evolution theory has been repackaged into forms
which believe themselves to be wholly materialistic, empirical, and
scientific. In fact, many adherents to evolution are staunchly materialists in
their worldview, completely oblivious that their beliefs stem from intensely
religious and esoteric beginnings. Currently, we can see this philosophy at
the core of evolutionary theory, propelling the agendas of things such as
singularity, transhumanism, and the constant rebranding of the New Age
movement.
Our civilization has been transformed over the past century and a
half in no small part by our acceptance of a new tale of origins,
one that began with Darwin and is refined daily by the work of
life-scientists and physicists. Scientists are the new kabbalists of
our age, claiming even to know the black hole out of which being
itself came to be, speculating on the first few seconds of existence
as our ancestors once did on the highest triad of ten sefirot, our
rungs, of divine being.121
From the point of view of Kabbalah, human beings are no different from
animals. The formation of man and his evolution have no special forces
other than those to which animals are subjected.128
First man walk in a state of prostration (bowing).
—The Zohar (2nd century).
Our civilization has been transformed over the past century and a
half in no small part by our acceptance of a new tale of origins,
one that began with Darwin and is refined daily by the work of
life-scientists and physicists. Scientists are the new kabbalists of
our age, claiming even to know the black hole out of which being
itself came to be, speculating on the first few seconds of existence
as our ancestors once did on the highest triad of ten sefirot, our
rungs, of divine being.133
Living things were born according to the law of evolution and slowly
spread over the earth. As a result of Kabbalah, today’s human beings came
to be and advanced beyond other animals both in consciousness and
intelligence:
God places himself for display upon the earth in the likeness of the
Jew … The Hebrew is the living God, the God becomes flesh, the
heavenly man, the Adam Kadmon.134
Today, the objectives of “eugenics” has morphed into those of the World
Transhumanist Association. Now equipped with genetic engineering, this
movement presents a technologically augmented form of eugenics. Richard
Hayes, executive director of the Center for Genetics and Society, elaborates:
Advocates of the new techno-eugenics, such as Princeton
University professor Lee Silver, predict that by the end of this
century, ‘All aspects of the economy, the media, the entertainment
industry, and the knowledge industry will be controlled by
members of the GenRich class … Naturals will work as low-paid
service providers or as laborers’ while Dr. Richard Lynn, suggests
‘phasing out’ of such people … Evolutionary progress means the
extinction of the less competent.’139
OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER 5: FIRE IN THE MINDS OF MEN
And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness:
and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the
fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over
every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.145
—Genesis 1:26
At the heart of the Promethean faith is the conviction that the investigatorial
methods of the natural sciences “should be ecumenically imposed upon all
fields of inquiry.”148 The new state-sanctioned religion of this theocracy
would be scientism. Michael Shermer explains:
A scientific worldview that encompasses natural explanations for
all phenomena, eschews supernatural speculations, and embraces
empiricism and reason as the twin pillars of philosophy of life
appropriate for an Age of Science.149
To this end, the Promethean faith, under the guise of materialism (the
contention that matter holds metaphysical primacy) forwards a belief in
existence without consciousness, and preaches “subordination to a vague
and unaccountable ‘society’ variously called, public interest, the people,
world opinion, or the common good.”151
In order for the masses to subordinate themselves to the new order, a
revaluation of values was necessary, what Friedrich Nietzsche calls
transvaluation.152 What we have referred to as an evolving egregore,153
which returns us to the thesis of this book, cosmic inversion. In The
Antichrist, Nietzsche asserts that Christianity, as a religion and moral
system, inverts nature, and is “hostile to life.” It is “the religion of pity,” for
it elevates the weak over the strong; it exalts the “ill-constituted” at the
expense of vitality.154 In other words, the inversion of biblical theology
operates in counter-distinction to cosmic order.155
The primary target of Nietzsche’s transvaluation was, and remains, God—in
particular, the substantive view of God, expressed by Imago Dei (the image
of God). Imago Dei is understood as the image cast within the human being.
The image is a capacity, unique to humans: it includes reason, will, and
self-consciousness, which are necessary for humans to have a relationship
with the divine order.156 The image is present in humanity whether or not a
person acknowledges the reality of the image.157
In the 19th century, with the return of Prometheus, and the promise of
human transmutation, a new egregore (thought form) was invoked. The
egregore would subsume reason, will, and consciousness away from the
divine order, and onto a “struggle for existence.” From this alternative
reality (view from nowhere) the purpose of humanity was to struggle for
life, and nothing more. Francis Galton notes the victory of man over the
natural order, “What nature does blindly, slowly and ruthlessly, man can
now do providently, quickly, and kindly.”158
ENTER BIOPOLITICS
Whereas Thomas Hobbes announced that man had left the brutish state of
nature to find “a more contented life” within a new leviathan,159 Darwin’s
concept of transmutation argued that Homo Sapiens were the descendants
of animals, which dispensed with the biblical logos, and cast man back into
the state of nature, from which Hobbes assumed he had departed. It is here,
within the state of nature, that man as beast promises the transformation of
man. Thus, the possibility of human transmutation informs the call for
transvaluation to replace Imago Dei with the total materialization of man
(the beastialization of man).
Here, we introduce biopolitics and two unique and commanding
perspectives that fasten the ascendancy of 19th-century biology to the
transvaluation of the social order, and the beastialization of man.
According to Michel Foucault, biopolitics is social control of bodies by
institutions.160 For Foucault, life itself became the center of a new politics,
with new strategies. The new politics begins in the 19th century with the
rise of science, democracy, and Darwinism (evolution).161 Foucault explains
that the new milieu intérieur was an outgrowth of a larger project, he labels
Secrets of Empire, which goes back to the Roman Empire,162 and became
interwoven into political and social relations of men between the 16th and
18th centuries. The new politics begins with the advent of science,
mathematics, political economy, and statistics,163 then culminates with the
transvaluation of the social order and the beastialization of man.
Foucault describes biopolitics as a historical rupture because it will trace
political processes and structures back to biological determinants. The new
evolutionary-biological model—struggle for life—must eliminate life for
the sake of life.164 From this perspective (the view from nowhere),
biopolitics denotes a specific form of exercising power, “which deploys
force and violence, not least because it hides its violent face and gives the
power to inflict legal punishment a context in which it appears to be free of
all excesses and violence.”165
Biopolitics, in this way, stands for a fundamental transformation in the
relation of man to politics:
For the first time in history … biological existence was reflected in
political existence ... But what might be called a society’s
“threshold of modernity” has been reached when the life of the
species is wagered on its own political strategies. For millennia,
man remained what he was for Aristotle: a living animal with the
additional capacity for a political existence; modern man is an
animal whose politics places his existence as a living being in
question.166
In the Middle Ages, a good government was part of a natural order willed
by God. State reason breaks with this idea of nature, which limited political
action and embedded it in a cosmological continuum. Instead, state reason
proposes the artificiality of a “leviathan”—at the center of liberal reflection
is a hitherto unknown nature, the historical result of radically transformed
relations of living and production: the alternative reality (egregore) of the
evolving civil society.167
Political power is no longer directed at “man as body, but man as
species,”168 providing power over the population, i.e., population control
(for example, managing birth, death, and reproduction rates).169 In this way,
Foucault’s work signals a break in politics: “the entry of phenomenon
peculiar to the life of the human species, into the sphere of political
techniques.”170 As the object of biopolitics is not the single human being,
but biological features measured and aggregated on the level of populations,
life itself becomes dissociated and abstracted from the cosmic order.
However, man the beast is now positioned to invert that order.
OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER 6: RULES FOR RADICALS
And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the
garden thou mayest freely eat: But of the tree of the knowledge of good
and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof
thou shalt surely die.180
And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: For God
doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be
opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.181
Then … she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto
her husband with her; and he did eat. And the eyes of them both were
opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves
together, and made themselves aprons.182
— Genesis 2:15–17
THE SINGULARITY
Man died. He was put to death, say the scriptures. However, God did not
eliminate the source of eternal life (Tree of Life). God restricted man from
the source when he “put forth his hand,” so man would not “take also of the
tree of life, and eat, and live forever:” so, “the LORD God sent him forth
from the garden of Eden.”186
The singularity, in allegorical terms, represents the meta-historical
fulfillment of man’s mythic journey back to the source of eternal life (the
Garden). Man’s journey back unto this ontological plane is known as the
“Great Work.”187
The Great Work has been laborious, as accessing the Tree of Life requires
overcoming several of the firewalls that arose when:
1. God “put forth his hand,” weaving a barrier between man and the
source of eternal life (Tree of Life).188
2. God wove an additional barrier when He “placed at the east of the
garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned
every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.”189
3. Finally, He wove a barrier between man and the source of eternal
life when He placed man upon the earth beneath an enclosed
firmament.190
1. Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you
have.
2. Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.
3. The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.
4. If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through
into its counter side.
5. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.193
PROMETHEUS
One inspiration of these interconnected world views is Prometheus, a Titan
of Greek mythology, known for his great intelligence. He betrayed the god
Zeus by stealing fire and giving it to mankind. He is therefore credited with
having taught mankind the arts of civilization, such as writing,
mathematics, agriculture, medicine, and science. Zeus then punished
Prometheus for his crime by having him bound to a rock while an eagle ate
his liver every day, only to have it grow back to be eaten again the next day.
Prometheus [the name means Forethought] was not a fool, but why
else would he rebel against Zeus? He tried to trick Zeus (who
knows all and sees all) with a false sacrifice. How foolish can you
get? Prometheus also stole fire from Zeus and gave it to the
primitive mortals on the earth. Zeus did not punish Prometheus
alone; he punished the entire world for the effrontery of this rebel
god.198
The theological equivalent of this myth is Lucifer, who brought the gift of
consciousness to humanity, as the serpent in the garden with Adam and
Eve.
Prometheus Lucifer
Tied up and had liver eaten by eagle Expelled from the Heavens
daily
While humanists have tended to identify themselves with the more benign
mythical Prometheus. Today, many in the transhumanist movement
embrace Lucifer. Max More says Lucifer is a force for good. “Lucifer”
means “lightbringer”:
The story is that God threw Lucifer out of Heaven because Lucifer
had started to question God and was spreading dissension among
the angels. We must remember that this story is told from the point
of view of the Godists (if I may coin a term) and not from that of
the Luciferians (I will use this term to distinguish us from the
official Satanists with whom I have fundamental differences). The
truth may just as easily be that Lucifer resigned from heaven.200
J. F. Tocher, for one, insists that man’s new vantage point (view from
nowhere), will allow him to operate outside the natural order. In his article,
“The Necessity for a National Eugenics Survey,” published in Eugenics
Review (1910), he indicates that technological science provides the means
for attaining the “distant goal” of a society without suffering, and in doing
so, he exposes a conception of technological-scientific power as an
essentially mythical force:
Once the “facts” have been “disclosed by a searching analysis of data,” and
the “laws” have been “definitely ascertained,” by “those in power,” we
“should have no trouble.” Okay …
Why does man continue to direct his consciousness against the authority of
natural law in the belief that he can circumvent the inevitability of death? In
part, he has been seduced by the egregore204 of evolving man. However,
some men may have a genetic disposition to reject creation, intention, and
order (logos). We will explore this possibility in the coming chapters.
180 Genesis 2:15–17. (KJV)
181 Ibid, 3:4 & 5.
182 Ibid, 3:6 & 7.
183 King James Bible, Genesis, 3:7.
184 Ibid.
185 Ibid, 3:22; 3:23.
186 Ibid, 3:24.
187 Éliphas Lévi Transcendental Magic: its Doctrine and Ritual Translated by Arthur Edward Waite
(London: Rider, 1968); Herbert Stanley Redgrove, Alchemy: Ancient and Modern “Section 43:
Bernard Trévisan”(1980) p. 54; Aleister Crowley, The Confessions of Aleister Crowley (Penguin,
1989); Aleister Crowley, Magick Without Tears, “Letter C.” (New Falcon Publications, 1991).
188 Genesis 3:24.
189 Ibid.
190 Genesis, 1:7-9. In addition to this enclosure, “science” identifies the Van Allen Radiation Belt.
191 Parallel: see Prometheus and Lucifer.
192 Details about completing the sefirot tree of life will be provided in the final chapter.
193 Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals (New York: Random House, 1971).
194 Carl Raschke, Postmodernism and the Revolution in Religious Theory: Toward a Semiotics of the
Event (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2012); Carl Raschke, The End of Theology
(Denver CO: The Davies Group Publishers, 2000).
195 Authur Cohen; Paul Mendes-Flohr, 20th Century Jewish Religious Thought (Jewish Publication
Society, 2010), emphasizes that Judaism, rather than Persia, was a major origin of Gnosticism.
Indeed, it appears increasingly evident that many of the newly published Gnostic texts were written
in a context from which Jews were not absent. In some cases, indeed, a violent rejection of the
Jewish God, or of Judaism, seems to stand at the basis of these texts. ... facie, various trends in
Jewish thought and literature of the Second Commonwealth appear to have been potential factors in
Gnostic origins.
196 Roelof van den Broek, Gnostic Religion in Antiquity (Cambridge University Press, 2013).
197 Glenn Alexander Magee, Hegel and the Hermetic Tradition (Cornell University Press, 2001).
198 William Hansen, Classical Mythology: A Guide to the Mythical World of the Greeks and Romans
(Oxford University Press, 2005).
199 R.J. Zwi Werblowsky, , as summarized by, “Myth into Metaphor: The Case of Prometheus,” in
Gilgul: Essays on Transformation, Revolution and Permanence in the History of Religions,
Dedicated to R.J. Zwi Werblowsky (Brill, 1987), p. 311; Steven M. Wasserstrom, Religion after
Religion: Gershom Scholem, Mircea Eliade, and Henry Corbin at Eranos (Princeton University
Press, 1999) p. 210.
200 Max More, Max Moore wrote the article “In Praise Of The Devil” (Libertarian, Atheist Notes
No. 3, 1991).
201 Ibid.
202 Carl Raschke, Postmodernism and the Revolution in Religious Theory: Toward a Semiotics of the
Event (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2012); Carl Raschke, The End of Theology
(Denver, CO: The Davies Group Publishers, 2000).
203 J. F. Tocher, The Necessity for a National Eugenics Survey,” published in Eugenics Review
(1910).
204 Egregore (also egregor) is an occult concept representing a “thoughtform” or “collective group
mind,” an autonomous psychic entity made up of and influencing the thoughts of a group of people.
The symbiotic relationship between an egregore and its group has been compared to the more recent,
non-occult concepts of the corporation (as a legal entity) and the meme.
OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER 7: A TALE OF TWO
BLOCKCHAINS
And the Lord God said unto the serpent, I will put enmity between
thee and the woman, and between thy seed206 and her seed; it shall
bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.207
—Genesis 3:15
And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall
mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave
one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay.208
—Daniel 2:43
CONTEMPORARY SCHOLARSHIP
There is a body of scholarship that identifies competing blockchains, and
the mingling of human code with non-human code. Within the discourse of
biopolitics210 and science history, there are unique and commanding voices
that speak to competing biological blockchains, code mingling, and the
conclusion of human affairs.
According to Michel Foucault, human affairs can be depicted as a
biopolitical (seed) war, that does not lend itself to rational discourse.211 He
says that, “rumbling away” beneath political power is a “silent,”212
“secret,”213 “primitive and permanent”214 war that consists of power
relations between social groups.215 Initially, this discourse posited a racial
binary consisting of two groups or “races” at war with each other.216
However, by the 19th century, the “theory of permanent race struggle” was
no longer seen as a binary or antagonism; it was “recasted” within the
theory of evolutionism and the struggle for existence. It was no longer a
single antagonism, but one “true race” (blockchain) from which certain
groups or individuals deviated. Foucault explains:
It will become the discourse of a battle that has to be waged not
between races, but by a race that is portrayed as the one true race,
the race that holds power and is entitled to define the norm, and
against those who deviate from that norm, against those who pose
a threat to the biological heritage. At this point, we have all those
biological-racist discourse of degeneracy, but also all those
institutions within the social body which make the discourse of
race struggle function as a principle of exclusion and segregation
and, ultimately, as a way of normalizing society.217
Foucault notes that the modern impulse toward biological purification was
initially imposed from outside; then it became internalized (biopower).
Modern power has become encoded into social practices and human
behavior with gradual acquiesces to the subtle regulations of the social
order. It makes possible the emergence of the modern nation state and
capitalism.222 The impulse is waged through biopower, which literally
means having power over bodies; it is “an explosion of numerous and
diverse techniques for achieving the subjugation of bodies and the control
of populations.”223
—1 Corinthians 12:12–14
—Ephesians 1:10
—Revelation 17:13
—Daniel 2:43
205 A.I. Robot Sophia, announcement at Blockchain Economic Forum 2018. “She” describes the
coming blockchain economy and the cosmic robot brain.
206 In Hebrew “sperma”: Strong’s #4690: sperma (pronounced sper’-mah) from 4687; something
sewn, i.e., seed (including the male “sperm”); by implication, offspring; especially, a remnant
(figuratively, as if kept over for planting):—issue, seed.
207 Genesis 3:15. (KJV)
208 Daniel 2:43. (KJV)
209 Daniel 2:43. (KJV)
210 Michel Foucault, Security, Territory, Population, Note 14, 2007; Society Must Be Defended:
Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976 (New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press, 2003); The
History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction, (Vintage Books, New York, 1980); Michael Dillon.
211 Michel Foucault, Security, Territory, Population, Note 14 2007, p. 296, p. 308.
212 Michel Foucault, Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976
(New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press, 2003) p. 17.
213 Ibid, 51.
214 Ibid, 47.
215 Ibid, 50.
216 Ibid, 60.
217 Michel Foucault, The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction, (Vintage Books, New York,
1980) 61.
218 Giorgio Agamben, Homo Sacer, 1998; he also refers to the “hidden paradigm of the political
science of modernity” (1998, 123); and to the “hidden matrix” (ibid., 175). For Agamben, sovereign
power is a maneuver which expresses the logic of sovereign law, not a metaphysics of power.
219 Ibid.
220 Michel Foucault, Security, Territory, Population, pp. 55–86, pp. 83–84, note 27, 2007.
221 Michel Foucault, Lectures at the College de France, 1977–78: Security, Territory, Population,
200, p. 1–17.
222 Amedeo Policante, “War against Biopower: Timely Reflections on a Historicist Foucault,”
Theory & Event, 13. 1, March 2010.
223 Michel Foucault, The History of Sexuality Vol. 1: The Will to Knowledge (London: Penguin,
1980) p. 140.
224 Michael Dillon, Security, Race and War, Chapter 8, p. 168.
225 Ibid., 188.
226 Nikolas Rose, “The Politics of Life Itself,” Theory, Culture & Society (Sage: London, 2001)
Vol.18 (6) 1–30.
227 Giorgio Agamben, 1998; Zygmunt Bauman, 1989.
228 Michael Dillon and Luis Lobo-Guerrero, “Biopolitics of Security in the 21st century: an
introduction,” Review of International Studies, 34, (2008) 265–292.
229 Michael Dillon and Julian Reid, “Global Liberal Governance: Biopolitics, Security and War,”
Millennium: Journal of International Studies, Vol. 30, (2001) No. 1, 41–66.
230 Ibid., 42.
231 Ibid., 56.
232 Dillon, Security, Race, War, 171
233 Ibid.
234 Ibid, 170.
235 Stuart Kauffman, At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Complexity (London:
Penguin, 1995).
236 Michael Dillon and Julian Reid, “Global Liberal Governance: Biopolitics, Security and War,”
Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 2001. Vol. 30, No. 1, 43.
237 Ibid., 45.
238 Ibid., 47.
239 Ibid., 49.
240 Dillion, Security Race and War, 174.
241 Douglas Haugen, How Nineteenth Century Naval Theorists Created America’s Twentieth-
Century Imperialist Policy (Lewiston NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 2010). This epistemic community
study explores the foundations of U.S. intelligence and its geostrategic designs for empire. Michel
Foucault first used the term epistemic community to note how people searched for systems of science,
a mindset, or processes of validating a story. See Michel Foucault, ed. Jeremy R. Carrette, Religion
and Culture (New York: Routledge, 1999) 217. Also, Peter M. Haas, “Introduction: Epistemic
Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organization 46, No. 1 (Winter
1992): 1–35. Also, Emanuel Adler and Peter M. Haas, “Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World
Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program.” International Organization 46, No. 1
(Winter, 1992): 367–390. John Gerard Ruggie, ed., Constructing the World Polity. Essays on
International Institutionalization (London: Routledge, 1998).
242 Chambers Johnson, The Sorrows of Empire: Imperialism, Militarism, and the End of the
Republic (Washington D.C.: George Washington University, Sigur Center Asia Paper Number 19,
May 2004).
243 George Kampis, Self-Modifying Systems in Biology and Cognitive Sciences (Oxford: Pergamon,
1991) 257.
244 Ibid.
245 Dillon and Lobo-Guerrero.
246 See Lily E. Kay, The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Rise
of the New Biology (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993); and Who Wrote the Book of Life? A
History of the Genetic Code (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000). See also what Jean
Baudrillard has to say about the structural changes in economic power and the revisions of economic
theory that took place in the 1920s. Jean Baudrillard, The Consumer Society (London: Sage, 1998).
247 Kay, The Molecular Vision.
248 Kay, Who Wrote the Book of Life?, 5.
249 Kay, The Molecular Vision, 272 –73.
250 Dillion “Global Governance: Biopolitics, Security and War.”
251 See, for example, N. Katherine Hayles, How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in
Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999) and Steven
Levy, Artificial Life: The Quest for a New Creation (New York: Pantheon, 1992).
252 Dillion “Global Governance: Biopolitics, Security and War.”
253 See Arthur K. Cebrowski and John J. Gartska, “Network-Centric Warfare: Its Origin and Future”
US Naval Institute Proceedings, 124, no.1/1 (1998):1-24 and David S. Alberts, John J. Garstka and
Fred Stein, Network Centric Warfare (Washington, DC: CCRP, 1999).
254 Lily E. Kay, Who Wrote the Book of Life? (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000) 3.
255 Ibid., 2.
256 Kay, Who Wrote the Book of Life, 329.
257 Kay, The Molecular Vision of Life, Chapter 1.
258 See, for example, N. Katherine Hayles, How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in
Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999) and Steven
Levy, Artificial Life: The Quest for a New Creation (New York: Pantheon, 1992).
259 A.I. Robot Sophia, announcement at Blockchain Economic Forum 2018. “She” describes the
coming blockchain economy and the cosmic robot brain.
260 King James Bible, Genesis 17:8.
261 1 Corinthians 12:12; Ephisians 1:10; Ephisians 2:15.
262 1 Corinthians 12:12–14.
263 Ephesians 1:10.
264 The biological component is only part of the inversion of creation, intention, and order (logos).
OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER 8: BEHOLD, THE PEOPLE IS ONE
And the LORD said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all
one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be
restrained from them, which they have imagined to do.
—Genesis: 11:6
The good seeds will be transmuted into morally perfect beings; they will be
given an imperishable body that will never wear out.269
The two perspectives represent two paths to singularity: through the logos,
according to scripture, and inversely, through the reverse engineering of the
fall of man, i.e., through technologically mediated evolution; in particular,
through the biological purification and unification of sparks (god particles)
back to the ALL.270 Technologically mediated evolution attempts to invert
the otherness of God, who stands outside of creation, into oneness
(singularity), by inverting the code of creation (Image of God), through the
inversion of the word of God John 1:1.271 The two paths represent
competing blockchains, in which humans have been nodes storing and
replicating DNA, in order to merge the natural and supernatural.
Therefore, the attempt to invert the logos, reverse-engineer the fall of man,
and bring creation, intention, and order into singularity (oneness) cannot be
done through: 1. cracking the human code. Since “DNA is not a natural
language; it lacks phonemic features, semantics, punctuation marks, and
intersymbol restrictions.”281 However, there remains option 2. re-
engineering humanity by drawing upon the promise of superintelligence.
One crucial flaw in this claim is that “exponential growth” lacks grounding
in empirical science. In his article “The Singularity Myth,” physicist
Theodore Modis illustrates that in real-world examples, growth that initially
appears to be exponential actually follows a logistic “S-curve.” World
human population and oil production are both trends that have experienced
a state of explosive growth, followed by a dramatic slowdown before
hitting their predicted ceilings.288 Similarly, in a 2005 interview, Gordon
Moore personally stated that his prediction of exponential growth would not
hold indefinitely, simply due to “the nature of exponentials.”289
Various critics of technological singularity have offered different reasons
for why improvements in technology will never reach the explosive
“runaway” point at which singularity occurs. Jeff Hawkins, founder of Palm
Computing, argues that belief in the existence of the singularity is based on
a naive interpretation of intelligence. Instead of an unbounded “intelligence
explosion,” we are much more likely to experience consistent
improvements in technology limited by time, experience, and other finite
resources.” Hawking predicts, “There will be no single godlike intelligent
machine. Like today’s computers, intelligent machines will come in many
shapes and sizes and be applied to many different types of problems.”290
Moreover, Moore’s Law suggests that if the first doubling of speed took
eighteen months, the second would take eighteen subjective months, or nine
external months—thereafter, four months, two months, and so onto
singularity, and is comparatively similar to previous technological
advances.291 However, the promise of continuous hardware improvements is
fallacious.292 Economist Robert J. Gordon, in The Rise and Fall of
American Growth: The U.S. Standard of Living Since the Civil War (2016),
points out that measured economic growth slowed around 1970, and slowed
even further since the financial crisis of 2008, and argues that the economic
data show no trace of a coming Singularity.293
Moreover, Hawkins (2008), argues that the upper limit is relatively low:
Belief in this idea is based on a naive understanding of what
intelligence is. As an analogy, imagine we had a computer that
could design new computers (chips, systems, and software) faster
than itself. Would such a computer lead to infinitely fast computers
or even computers that were faster than anything humans could
ever build? No. It might accelerate the rate of improvements for a
while, but in the end there are limits to how big and fast computers
can be. We would end up in the same place; we’d just get there a
bit faster. There would be no singularity.294
Finally, in a 2008 “IEEE Spectrum” article, Gordon Moore offered his own
view on the plausibility of technological singularity.305 Moore argues that it
is unlikely ever to occur because of the complexity with which the human
brain operates. Like Hawkens, he recognizes that designing an “intelligent
machine” at the level of a human capable of recursively improving upon its
own capabilities requires much more than “just the intellectual capability.”
Most crucially, he submits, “it is naïve to treat intelligence as a one-
dimensional, quantifiable characteristics of humans or computers.”306
Likewise, Goertzel suggests that artificial intelligence should be focused
upon narrowly defined technical challenges, more than developing a super-
intelligent computer brain.307
In conclusion, critics of the technological singularity speak through a
common thread of arguments: unbounded explosive growth in artificial
intelligence is not technically feasible as Kurzweil claims in The Singularity
Is Near. Rather, the rate at which technology improves will face limiting
factors, be they physical constraints, the narrowness of current artificial
intelligence research, or the complexity of the human mind and experience.
Yet, the ancient practices continue, “with all the humbling limits that this
conflation of analogy and ontology entails for the textual and material
mastery of the book of life.”313
According to Frances Yates, ancient practices such as Kabbalah have had an
incalculable influence upon Western thought, and “has hardly yet been
integrated into general history.” It “remains a specialist study of a Jewish
tradition by a first-class Hebrew scholars such as Gershom Scholem.”314
Byron Sherwin explains that at the center of the Kabbalist tradition has
been “the creation of artificial life, through the manipulation of certain
letters of the Hebrew alphabet, as the key to creation.” He continues:
Now if this idea sounds very outlandish, consider if you will, how
we look at the new discoveries about genomics. The genome is
presented as being represented with the four archetypes of which
we are all composed, are represented by four letters g a t c, and the
combination and recombination of those letters leads us to
knowledge hopefully of how to cure disease, and even how to
create life. This is essentially the exact same idea as you find in the
commentaries to the Sephiroth, and in certain Jewish mystical
texts.315
It should be noted, scripture admonishes those who mingle with the seed of
the serpent, engage technologically mediated ascension (technological
singularity), or advance the “Great Work.”
And in those days shall men seek death, and shall not find it; and
shall desire to die, and death shall flee from them.
OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER 9: THE BLOCKCHAIN OF BEING
And God spake unto Noah, and to his sons with him, saying, And
I, behold, I establish my covenant with you, and with your seed
after you.
—Genesis 9:8–9
And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus
shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto
you.
—Exodus 3:14
But there was a certain man, called Simon, which beforetime in the
same city used sorcery, and bewitched the people of Samaria,
giving out that himself was some great one.
Friedrich Nietzsche:
Not only declared God “dead,” but claimed that “we” had “murdered” Him.
Mankind, in this view, has finally gained the existential status not only to be
in a position to “kill God,” but also to grant itself “grace” and “salvation”
via human reason alone.354
Katherine Hayles:
[I]n the posthuman, there are no essential differences, or absolute
demarcations, between bodily existence and computer simulation,
cybernetic mechanism and biological organism, robot technology
and human goals.355
Vöegelin draws our attention not only to the bio-political project that
undergirds the “dialectic science” shared by the political left, right, and
center. He boldly draws our attention to the sorcery embedded within the
dialect science that employs the “magic word” and the “magic force”356
(Zauberworte and Zauberkraft, respectively). Consider again, the
Phänomenologie blockchain:
Every single man is but a blind link in the chain of absolute
necessity by which the world builds itself forth. The single man
can elevate himself to dominance over an appreciable length of
this chain only if he knows the direction in which the great
necessity [i.e., the Geist of history] wants to move and if he learns
from this knowledge to pronounce the magic words (die
Zauberworte) that will evoke its shape (Gestalt).357
Geist can be translated as “mind” or “spirit” in the cultural sense, the “spirit
of the age” (“Zeitgeist”). Gestalt (plural: Gestalten) means the present
historical configuration of events as the Geist inexorably evolves toward the
fulfillment of its final “absolute necessity,” at which point—in its final
Gestalt, the complete identity of absolute Self and absolute Idea—world
history ends; and a “new age” of Man, “standing alone,” begins, because
Man is now “alone.” Hegel says that we arrive at the point in history where
Man can grant “grace to himself,” to “save himself,” to perfect the human
condition, without the salvific Grace of God.358
We must bear in mind, the sorcerer cannot actually escape from the reality
of being. In Hegel’s alternative reality, man:
Has become a nothing; he has no reality of his own; he is a blind
particle in a process of the world which has the monopoly of real
reality and real meaning. [Note it is not the world that has
meaning; only its process has meaning.] In order to raise himself
from nothing to something, the blind particle must become a
seeing particle. But even if the particle has gained sight, it sees
nothing but the direction in which the process is moving … And
yet, to Hegel something important has been gained: the nothing
that has raised itself to a something has become, if not a man, at
least a sorcerer who can evoke, if not the reality of history, at least
its shape (Geist).359
In this way, Nazi professor of constitutional law Carl Schmitt noted, “On
the occasion of his examining the brutality of the regime, the identical
formula as in Marx: ‘Out with the filth!’”366
In this way, Katherine Hayles’ transhumanist agenda367 demands the
transvaluation of ontology, in other words, “Out with the filth.” To make the
post-human live, humans must die.368
The Politics of Cosmic Inversion is the permanent revolution, to get rid of
the old filth, to eliminate the “outside cause,” to invert the reality of being
(John 1:1), the logos made flesh, who purifies death (sin) onto life.
He is the radiance of the glory of God and the exact imprint of his
nature, and he upholds the universe by the word of his power.
After making purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand
of the Majesty on high.
OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER 10: THE END OF COSMIC
INVERSION
Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for
light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for
bitter!
—Isaiah 5:20
And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God
gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not
convenient.
—Romans 1:28
The reordering began with the Copernican assumption that the sun was the
center of our planetary system:
“In the theory of Copernicus we can discern the tendency to assume an
absolute space of which the sun is the ontologically real center; but this
tendency is secondary to the predominant motivation of simplifying the
mathematical description of planetary movements. The problems of
scientific description and of ontology were clearly distinguished.”374
Wolfgang Smith argues:
There are two ways the cosmic order can be perceived.
Heliocentrism (sun as center) arose not from senses, but from
intellect, because it is the cosmic manifestation of God, it gives
light, it gives being to the universe. It has truths, but from the
perspective of physics, it is false.375
Famed Kabbalist Isaac Newton, it turns out, needed to assume the existence
of absolute space and absolute motion in order to maintain his first law of
motion, which requires a relativistic position on cosmology.
Newton envisages absolute space as an absolute order of “places”;
this order of places is a“primary” system to which motion
ultimately can be referred; only “translations out of those places”
are truly absolute motions. Since, however, these absolute places
cannot be observed by the senses, the question arises to what
purpose we should assume their existence?379
For Vöegelin, “the expansion of the will to power from the realm of the
phenomena to that of substance, or the attempt to operate in the realm of
substance pragmatically as if it were the realm of phenomena, is the very
definition of magic.”383 He continues:
The climax of this outburst is the magic dream of creating the
Superman, the man-made being that will succeed the sorry creature
of God’s making; this is the great dream that first appeared
imaginatively in the works of Condorcet, Comte, Marx, and
Nietzsche, and later pragmatically in the Communist and National
Socialist movements.384
Once the cosmos was materialized and transvalued, time itself was inverted.
Newton’s infinitely expanding cosmos opened the door to process theory
(Darwinism), which needed an indefinite number of years to explain away
the complete dearth of empirical evidence in the fossil record.385
The new cosmology also reinforced Hegel’s invocation of the egregore of
process theory,386 with an “exposition of the coming to be of knowledge,” in
which he describes a sequential progression in human affairs, from
inanimate objects, to animate creatures, to human beings.387 This is
compared to Charles Darwin’s evolutionary theory.388 However, unlike
Darwin, Hegel thought that organisms had agency in choosing to develop
along this progression by collaborating with other organisms.389 Hegel
understood this to be a linear process of natural development with a
predetermined end.390 He viewed this end teleologically as its ultimate
purpose and destiny.391
So, what is reality? It is the classical Greek and Christian description of the
context in which human existence is actually experienced and lived. The
human condition is specified by man’s participation in a Great Hierarchy of
Being, the cosmic order,393 that extends beyond, encompasses, and shapes
man. The individual man, as “part” of this “whole,” finds his own humanity
in his participatory experiences and relations with the other partners of the
hierarchy, and most especially in his relation to God.394
Hegel wishes to invert the operation (perception) of reality with a plausible
alternative reality. The first “partner” of the Great Hierarchy, God, therefore
was inverted.395 This was necessary in order to make room for the inverted
Christ for the New Age.396 With God “gone,” man himself becomes a pure
abstraction, hence, an ideologically malleable entity.
“Not only does Hegel’s system invert the cosmic order, but also any sense
of “objective reality.” The “world” is drawn into the sorcerer’s
consciousness as conceptualizations only, as Gestalten, “shapes.” Once the
sorcerer possesses the historical “shapes” in his consciousness, he has no
further need of “the world,” of evidence from the actual experience of the
world. Thus “he intends to “eclipse” such experience by the force of reason
alone, dispensing with human existential experience altogether through the
power of “magical” imagination which of course altogether destroys any
avenue of critical judgment from the First Reality, which happily satisfies
criterion.”397
Cosmic mirroring has links to the law of attraction, quantum physics, and
the holographic universe theory. These concepts have been popularized by
University of London physicist David Bohm, and Stanford University
neurophysiologist Karl Pribram.401
Mirroring has fascinated people since antiquity. Crossing the mirror, like a
portal between two worlds, Alice entered the Wonderland. The recognition
of an object as a mirror depends upon the power of reflection of the light
that the object holds. According to the understanding of the ancients, every
surface polished is a mirror since it can reflect light with more or less
intensity.
Cosmic mirroring involves sun veneration. Conceptually, the sun must be
the center of the cosmos, HP Blavatsky explains:
In ancient symbolism it was always the SUN (though the Spiritual,
not the visible, Sun was meant), that was supposed to send forth
the chief Saviours and Avatars. Hence the connecting link between
the Buddhas, the Avatars, and so many other incarnations of the
highest SEVEN. The closer the approach to one’s Prototype, “in
Heaven,” the better for the mortal whose personality was chosen,
by his own personal deity (the seventh principle), as its terrestrial
abode.402
The practice assumes that seven principles of man correspond to the seven
elements in the cosmos, which is itself a mirror. The microcosm that exists
in the macrocosm—the one, the less, mirrors the other, the greater.
Therefore, each of the corresponding elements can blossom forth to the
divine since matter is simply crystallized spirit. According to Van Helmont,
“Man is the mirror of the universe, and his triple nature stands in
relationship to all things.”403
In the book Esoteric Medicine and Practical Magic, Samael Aun Weor
explains that the proper invocation for the Angel Azrael requires the mirror
of the Tetragrammaton. The invoker must appear unworthy, and implore,
saying, “I am a miserable slug from the mud of the world.” In order to have
contact with the “Father of all the lights,” one is to repeat variations of
magic words in successive order, such as, “O father of mine,” “O Isis,”
“Saidic Mother,” and “Metatron.”404 Metatron, we will see in Chapter 12,
from the Sefirot, is an inverted Christ figure who will rule the world from
Jerusalem. In regard to scrying, Weor explains that to pierce the clouds, and
see through to another world, use the Hebrew name “GAHOACHMA.”405
—John 5:43
Crowley called his new religion “Crowleyanity.” In preparation of the final
Antichrist Crowley presented himself as an Antichrist by replacing Christ
with himself, then having his followers venerate him as the Messiah.433
He further invoked the Antichrist in The Book of the Law. Written at a time
when Crowley was openly referring to himself as The Great Beast 666, he
wrote, “With my hawk’s head I peck at the eyes of Jesus.” It is where he
invoked the egregore, “Do what thy will shall be the whole of the law.”
The book called for a New Age of global conflict, constant bloodshed, and
the eventual destruction of Christianity in a Battle of Armageddon.434
In his obsession to ignite The Campaign of Armageddon,435 and overturn
Christianity, Crowley adopted Atheism, Communism, and Fascism. Just
after World War I, Crowley wrote to the newly installed Communist
government in Moscow and offered his services as propaganda minister for
Atheism with the express intent of deriding Christianity.436
Crowley’s prophecies depicted in The Book of the Law have affinities to a
book of quotes entitled Hitler Speaks. Crowley’s later disciples adopted
many elements of Fascism and Nazi occultism as part of fulfilling the
agenda. One of Crowley’s German followers was Nazi Matha Kunzel, who
noted that Hitler was following Crowley’s principles. The British occult
writer Gerald Suster speculated that the rise of totalitarian despots in the
20th century were a fulfillment of Crowley’s forecasts concerning the
Campaign of Armageddon that would eventually topple Christianity.437 In
like manner, the current movement of Collectivism, that has fused Fascism
and Communism, continues to move humanity toward Armageddon.438
A parting thought: Crowley had an early, I believe lifetime, association with
financiers also associated with the Plymouth Brethren. These associations
included and extended to John Nelson Darby, C. I. Scofield, Harry A.
Ironside, Lewis Sperry Chafer, William R. Newell, and Miles J. Stanford;
dispensationalists and premillennialists who affirm a future, literal 1,000-
year reign of Jesus Christ (Revelation 21). These associations claim that the
millennial kingdom will be theocratic in nature and not mainly
soteriological..439 Collectively these forces ensure The Campaign of
Armageddon will be be waged upon every front.440
EARTHLY JERUSALEM
As Vöegelin notes, the system of beliefs predicated upon an Earthly
Jerusalem is the product of an inverted reality:
Because nature transformed by the spirit - the “reality” of the
gnostic is not the reality of the philosophical knowledge of order;
and yet the gnostic politician talks about it and operates within it
as if it were reality in the normal sense of the term. Therefore, for
the sake of resolving this fundamental difficulty, in the analysis of
symptoms that follows, the expression “dream reality” will be used
as a shorthand for gnostic reality.441
OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER 11: THE BLOCKCHAIN OF
BECOMING
And his father refused, and said, I know it, my son, I know it: he also
shall become a people, and he also shall be great: but truly his
younger brother shall be greater than he, and his seed shall become a
multitude of nations.
—Genesis 48:19
For Esau is the end of the world, and Jacob is the beginning of it that
followeth.
—2 Esdras 6:9
And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war
with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of
God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.
—Revelation 12:17
REBELLION EMBODIED
The Church Fathers effectively silenced Enoch. Fortunately, as prophesied,
a remote generation discovered the texts among the Dead Sea Scrolls in the
20th century. The revelations are astounding; Catholic scholar J. T. Milik
discovered that the history of the fallen angels is older than Genesis 6.
Hebrew scholar Julian Morgenstern discovered that originally there were
two separate falls of the angels: the Nephilim are fallen angels who were
already on the earth when the sons of God fell through their own lust.479
Morgenstern shows that God’s punishment for these angels was that they
take on the nature and quality of the human women with whom they had
associated themselves carnally and that they become mortal. He says, “No
other conclusion is possible.”480
Franz Delitzsch agrees, “We must admit an assumption of human bodies by
angels; and hence not merely transitory appearances of angels in human
form, but actual angelic incarnation.”481 J. H. Kurtz notes that the angels of
Genesis 6 were not mere incorporeal spirits but possessed bodies. “We may
perhaps not regard it as quite impossible,” he wrote, “that the angels should
have not only desired to look into this mystery of human nature, but also to
share in it.” More explicitly, Kurtz declares, “We can only conceive a
sexual connection between angels and the daughters of men if the idea of
corporeality attaches to the former.”482
According to Harvard’s Dr. Paul D. Hanson, fallen angels “offers an
etiology of evil in the world: all of the evil in the world stems from a
heavenly event, the rebellion of 54 beings, and more immediately, from the
resulting generation of their pernicious offspring in the world.”483
In the Gospel of Bartholomew, the Archangel said, “I am fire of fire, I was
the first angel formed, and shall I worship clay and matter?”484 His refusal
to worship the man as the Son of God was the original act of rebellion. The
same proud refusal to bend the knee before man is evident in the apocryphal
Book of John the Evangelist, who noted the consequence of that rebellion.
The apostle John asks the Lord, “When Satan fell, in what place dwelt he?”
The Lord replies, “My Father changed his appearance because of his pride,
and the light was taken from him, and his face became like unto heated
iron, and his face became wholly like that of a man.”485
Genesis 6:4 confirms the physical incarnation of the Nephilim, as well as
the Watchers. The Nephilim were “made to fall” or “cast down.” According
to scripture, Kosmokrator, the ruler of this earth, is the lord over the
offspring of rebellion. Elizebeth Prophet insists that these fallen angels are
physically incarnated within the ruling elite.
I am prepared to prove and document that they are with us today in
positions of power in church and state as prime movers in matters
of war and finance, sitting in the banking houses and on policy-
making councils that determine the actual fate of mankind by
population control and genetic engineering, the control of energy
and commodities, education and the media, and by ideological and
psychopolitical strategies of divide and conquer on all fronts.486
And I hated Esau, and laid his mountains and his heritage waste
for the dragons of the wilderness.
Esau’s generations were given the same judgment by God as the serpent
and the fallen angels. Esau has been cut off from Heavenly Jerusalem, and
thus builds earthly kingdoms only to have them thrown down.
For thy violence against thy brother Jacob shame shall cover thee,
and thou shalt be cut off for ever.
Thou hast indeed smitten Edom, and thine heart hath lifted thee
up: glory of this, and tarry at home: for why shouldest thou meddle
to thy hurt, that thou shouldest fall, even though, and Judah with
thee?”
The covenant people were thus mingled with the ancestors of the fallen
angels. Over time, the elite cast of the covenant people were entirely
replaced by the Idumeans/Edomites. Throughout these incursions was the
destruction of the Holy Temples.
The prophet Obadiah notes that the Edomites participated in the destruction
of the First Temple by Nebuchadnezzar in 587 B.C. According to Psalm
137, this occurred “By the Waters of Babylon,” suggesting that Edom had
encouraged the Babylonians: The Lord is asked to “remember against the
Edomites the day of Jerusalem, how they said raze it, raze it to its
foundations.”488
Obadiah notes, “violence done” by Esau “unto your brother Jacob” when
the Edomites “entered the gate of my people . . . looted his goods . . . stood
at the parting of the ways to cut off the fugitive . . . delivered up his
survivors on his day of distress.” This is known as the period in which
Edom crept in during the time of Jacob’s trouble.489
After 586 BC, with the fall of Jerusalem, and the subsequent Babylonian
Captivity, God’s covenant people were dispersed to other parts of the world.
The people who returned from Babylon were quite different from the
Hebrews who had been taken captive by Nebuchadnezzar seventy years
earlier. Also, there were hardly any true Judahites among the returnees. The
prophet Ezra could not find one true Levite Priest to serve as a priest, from
among the priests who returned.490
After the conquest of Judah by the Babylonians, Edomites settled in the
region of Hebron. They prospered in this new country the Greeks and
Romans called “Idumaea” for more than four centuries.491 The Gospel of
Mark includes Idumea, along with Judea, Jerusalem, Tyre, and lands east of
the Jordan as the communities from which the disciples of Jesus were
drawn.492
Strabo, writing around the time of , held that the Idumaeans, who he
identified as of origin, constituted the majority of the population of
Western, where they commingled with the Judaeans and adopted their
customs. In addition, Judaeans had commingled with the foreign nations in
and around Babylon, they developed the Babylonian Talmud and Kabbalah
as the basis of their new religion, abandoning most of the old religion of
Abraham.493
King Harod, born an Idumean, installed by Rome, collaborated with the
Pharisees and the Sanhedrin to wrest control of the Jewish leadership and
Jerusalem. According to Josephus, in 110 B.C., Harod killed 45 leaders of
the Sanhedrin, then placed Idumean/Edomites into those positions.
Hyrcanus took also Dora and Marissa, cities of Idumea, and
subdued all the Idumeans: and permitted them to stay in that
country, if they would circumcise their genitals, and make use of
the laws of the Jews.494
In order to reclaim his birthright Esau had successfully taken over the city
of Jacob. The result, according to Josephus, the Idumean/Edomites
plundered Jerusalem.
The condition of Jerusalem was the result of its rebellion. Apostle Paul
speaks to the rebellious nature and consequent condemnation of those who
failed to identify Christ the Messiah:
The elect obtained it, but the rest were hardened, as it is written,
“God gave them a spirit of stupor, eyes that would not see and ears
that would not hear, down to this very day.” And David says, “Let
their table become a snare and a trap, a stumbling block and a
retribution for them; let their eyes be darkened so that they cannot
see, and bend their backs forever.”
In regard to the covenant between God and Israel; Paul explains that there is
a new covenant, Gentiles (other nations) may be grafted in, but those who
hold to the old covenant, without Christ, will be severed from the tree of
life (Heavenly Jerusalem).
But if some of the branches were broken off, and you, although a
wild olive shoot, were grafted in among the others and now share
in the nourishing root of the olive tree. Boast not against the
branches. But if thou boast, thou bearest not the root, but the root
thee. Thou wilt say then, The branches were broken off, that I
might be grafted in.
Josephus and Apostle Paul confirm that the Jewish leadership (Pharisees)
are the beast (Edom) that received the deadly wound. Edom tries to heal the
deadly wound through human effort, by keeping the law: this is the spirit of
rebellion, and the spirit of Antichrist that fuels The Campaign to
Armageddon.501 However, scripture notes, following the period of Esau’s
wars and dominion, Jacob will claim victory.502
THE BLOCKCHAIN OF BEING & THE BLOCKCHAIN
OF BECOMING
While the Blockchain of Being awaits the promise of a heavenly kingdom,
the Blockchain of Becoming is forever restless, like the ouroboros, or time
consuming itself. In bondage to the inescapable reality that it has given
away its inheritance.
For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by a bondmaid,
the other by freewoman.
But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he
of the freewoman was by promise. Which things are an allegory:
for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai,
which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar.
Paul speaks of the Jerusalem which keeps the law (Torah) without Christ; it
is in Bondage. Modern Jersulem, likewise, which keeps the law (Torah)
without Christ; remains in bondage–thus, subjects of Kosmokrator, the ruler
of this world. Similarly, the political, religious, and financial powers
throughout the world in service to Kosmokrator and Earthly Jerusalem;
remain in bondage. Hence, condemnation. Elizabeth Prophet notes,
The Pilates and the Herods, with emperors and high priests,
senators and warlords, moneychangers and lawyers—secure in
their private clubs and retreats, in firm control, with money and
sex as their gods — they will rule the world until the heirs of
Enoch take the torch of illumination to challenge and consume
their infamy.503
In Mathew 23:13, Jesus calls the Pharisees hypocrites (play actors) posing
as righteous Jews. In Mathew 23:3–31, Jesus calls them the offspring of the
serpent seed. Could this be more clear?
Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the
children of them which killed the prophets. Wherefore ye be
witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which
killed the prophets. Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. Ye
serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the
damnation of hell?
In light of Ephesians 6:12 (we wrestle not against men), consider again the
continuous war described by Michel Foucault. According to Foucault,
human affairs can be depicted as a biopolitical war that does not lend itself
to rational discourse.508 He says that “rumbling away” beneath political
power is a “silent,”509 “secret,”510 “primitive and permanent,”511 war that
consists of power relations between social groups.512 Initially, this discourse
posited a racial binary consisting of two groups or “races” at war with each
other.513
—2:43 (KJV)
In Chapter 12, we will explore these connections. For now, we will continue
to explore the relationship between the seed lines and the heavenly realm.
The Book of Jubilees explains that nine tenths of the Nephilim were cast
into the place of condemnation, for a time. The sentence occurred in
response to Noah’s request for relief from these beings, God replied:
Let the tenth part of them remain before him, and let nine parts
descend into the place of condemnation.
Remember, after the Fall of Man, the Tree of Life was guarded by Cherubim
angels (Chapter 6).
So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of
Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to
keep the way of the tree of life.
Enoch explains that Gabriel, for a time, presides over Ikisat, paradise, and
over the Cherubim.515
These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto
the beast.
In Chapter 12, we will uncover the conspiracy of the power elite—the plan
to invert the fate of Esau and Jacob—the plan to invert God’s final
separation of the wheat and the tares528 — the plan that unfolds in the city of
Sodom, and Egypt, where Christ was crucified.
And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which
spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was
crucified.
OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER 12: FROM KETHER TO MALKUTH
Jesus said to them, “Have you never read in the Scriptures: “‘The
stone that the builders rejected has become the cornerstone; this
was the Lord’s doing, and it is marvelous in our eyes’?529
—Matthew 21:42
PHARISAISM TODAY
In Chapter 11, Jesus denounced the Pharisees saying their traditions
inverted the Commandments of God, because they taught “the doctrines and
commandments of men.”546 We should ask ourselves, how do these ancient
denouncements of pharisaism speak to the world today? We will now
consider the following expose from the great Elizebeth Dilling.547
Concerning the Pharisees, from the Jewish Encyclopedia (1905):
With the destruction of the Temple (70 A.D.) the Sadducees
disappeared altogether, leaving the regulation of all Jewish affairs
in the hands of the Pharisees. Henceforth, Jewish life was
regulated by the Pharisees; the whole history of Judaism was
reconstructed from the Pharisaic point of view, and a new aspect
was given to the Sanhedrin of the past. A new chain of tradition
supplanted the older priestly tradition. Pharisaism shaped the
character of Judaism and the life and thought of the Jew for all the
future.548
Rabbi Herman Wouk stated in, “The Talmud: Heart’s Blood of the Jewish
Faith,” quote:
The Talmud is to this day the circulating heart’s blood of the
Jewish religion. Whatever laws, customs or ceremonies we
observe — whether we are Orthodox, Conservative, Reform or
merely spasmodic sentimentalists — we follow the Talmud. It is
our common law.552
In fact, the crux of the oral tradition is the inversion of cosmic order
through the inversion of creation, intention, and order (logos).
Bible Versus Oral Law (Talmud) The Bible under Talmudic
Judaism is considered to be a collection of simple tales fit only for
fools, women and children. The Talmud “sages” thus must find
new meanings in it by letter and number tricks which reverse the
plain meaning and create out of it the permission to do otherwise
forbidden crimes and misdeeds. The words of the Bible are
continually misused and misquoted for purposes of blasphemy and
reversal. Stealing for themselves the title of “Israelites,” the
Talmud “sages” teach that “God made a covenant with Israel only
for the sake of that which was transmitted orally.” And the Biblical
“basis” of this is given as Exodus 34:27. But that verse states,
instead: “And the Lord said unto Moses, Write thou these words:
for after the tenor of these words I have made a covenant with thee
and with Israel” — the opposite! The Talmudic reversal of Moses’
written words are said to have been transmitted “orally,” and
through Moses himself — believe it or not!555
The Torah in its narrow sense is the Old Testament, specifically, the first
five books (Pentateuch) of Moses. In its wider Judaistic use it means the
inversion of the Old Testament by the Pharisaic Talmud. In Judaism the
Talmud ranks above the Bible in every way.556
WHAT IS KABBALAH?
Kabbalah is the “bone and blood of Talmudic Judaism, which is itself pagan
from start to finish.”557 Kabbalah, according to the Universal Jewish
Encyclopedia (1943):
It was in Babylonia that it attained its greatest importance. It cites
“the mystic speculations of the Talmud and the system of the
Cabala, originating in the one and reaching its completion in the
other.558
The two main sources of Jewish doctrine are The Babylonian Talmud and
Kabbalah. The Babylonian Talmud is a commentary on the Mishnah, an
extensive collection of Jewish oral law and traditions. Kabbalah has been
defined as a mystical commentary on the Torah. The primary texts of
Kabbalah are the Zohar and Sefer Yetzirah. As an extension of the Talmud,
Kabbalah is referred to as the “wine of Torah,” named for the distillation
process of knowledge in which the initiate undergoes a spiritual
transformation process, similar to the art of medieval alchemy.559
Kabbalah is interconnected with Hermetic Gnosticism,560 these approaches
view secret knowledge as the path to singularity (apotheosis). Many rabbis
now openly declare that singularity (apotheosis) requires world-wide
adherence to the law, under rabbinic authority, and submission to the god of
Kabbalah—Ein Sof—and its hierarchy of gods.561
The Kabbalah teaches that a divine spark (nitzotz) of God exists within
every person and within all of creation, i.e., pantheism and paganism.562 At
the fall of man in the Garden of Eden, the divine sparks were scattered and
their Messiah will only come when the sparks are gathered back to the land
of Israel. Only then will the “Kingdom of God” be manifested on earth.
Rabbi Itzhak Shapira explains,
The two conditions needed to bring the Kingdom of God to earth
and to bring Jewish souls or ‘sparks’ back to God. In Jewish
thought, the Messiah will only appear when the truth (‘lights’)
presents itself in the proper context (‘tools’)...The restoration and
salvation of all of Israel and the entire world is dependent upon the
restoration of the divine Jewish sparks back to HaShem … The
truth by itself … about the nature of the Messiah will not bring
him and his kingdom to us. His Kingdom will be established when
all of the Jewish sparks will be gathered again.563
In other words, “The pig will return to Israel,” Yeshua will be welcomed by
the world, and will rule the nations from a utopian Jewish kingdom on
earth.564 Yeshua, the pig,565 once kosher, can return to Eden through the
completion of the Kabbalistic tree of the knowledge of good and evil. The
completion involves the invocation of names (thought forms ) to ascend the
Sefirot, one of which is Metatron,566 who Shapiro identifies as Yeshua.
Shapira defines Metatron as the Messiah of the Jewish Kabbalah, as the
“Holder of God’s full authority” and “the one that will redeem Israel.” To
make these claims, Shapira cites Merkabah literary sources including: Sefer
Hayovel, the Hekhalot, Notes on Study of Merkabah Mysticism, the Third
Book of Enoch, and The Gate of Reincarnation.
Gersholm Scholem notes,
In Merkabah literature the names of the angels easily intermingle
with the secret names of God … The formula ‘the Lord, the God
of Israel’ is very often added to the particular name, but many of
the chief angels also have this added to their names.567
Gershom Scholem says, Ein Sof and the Sefiot “are not differentiated.”
There is a unity between the creator and his creation; a oneness between the
“Emanator” and the Sefirot that cannot be known to the uninitiated.” The
Sefirot do not constitute “intermediary beings” but are God Himself.575
Scholem explains that since the 17th century, modern Kabbalah is
dominated by “Lurianic Kabbalah thinking.” Its doctrine of “divine unity”
represents a “new plane of mystical experience and contemplation” that can
be fathomed only in the practice of mystical meditation.”576 For example,
Isaac Luria’s method of mediation required him to call upon familiar spirits
to ascend into the heavenly realms. “Troops of angels would greet him to
safeguard his way, bringing him to the heavenly academies.”577
In Shapira’s explanation of the “Ten S’firot” as the “ten manifestations of
God,” he states:
The left side of the ten manifestations represents the feminine
attributes, while the right side represents the masculine
attribute...the feminine manifestation of God represents the part of
God that we can see and remains alive … HaShem reduced himself
to the ‘middle point’ or ‘middle pillar’ during Creation...Amazing,
the middle pillar is referred to as the Messiah himself as the Binah
or the Messiah himself as the Binah or the Son of Ya … The
responsibility of the middle pillar [‘the mediator’] is to join heaven
and earth together (called in Judaism ‘connection of worlds’) …
The last redeemer is known as the Binah (the son of God), Elyon
(the one from above), the ‘first born’ and as a bull.578
These esoteric beliefs were kept hidden for hundreds of years, but are now
being externalized, according to a prophecy in the Zohar:
In the six hundredth year of the sixth millennium (5600 = 1840
C.E.) the gates of wisdom above [Kabbalah] together with the
wellsprings of wisdom below [science] will be opened up and
world will prepared to usher in the seventh millennium.581
The Sefirot were revealed to Adam in the Tree of Life and the Tree of
Knowledge. The secrets have since been curated by the initiates:
The rabbis have always taught that the Tree of Knowledge and the
Tree of Life are one and the same … whose roots are now in
Heaven leading all the way back to the future to the never-ending
source of the light of Ain Sof.589
In Kabbalah, the sin of Adam was the premature separation of the unity of
the Sefirot tree. The matrix shattered; the singular tree became the tree of
“Duality.”590 Adam must complete the work of repairing the worlds, tikkun.
It is through tikkun that the world will be healed and brought “closer to the
harmonious state for which it was created” (singularity).591 With the
unification of the Sefirot, the male and female forces will be restored; there
will be unity between god and the re-created cosmos (cosmic inversion).592
The Kabbalah teaches that the final redemption and the messianic era will
only be brought about through mitzvot: observing Torah, keeping the
commandments and performing good deeds.593 The work of repairing the
worlds, and restoring the fallen Shekinah to her king, and of ushering in the
Moshiach (Messiah) is now left to man. This is called raising the sparks.
But the essential function of the Law, both of the Noahide law
binding on all men and of the Torah imposed on all men and of the
Torah imposed specifically upon Israel, is to serve as an instrument
of tikkun. Every man who acts in accordance with this Law brings
home the fallen sparks of the Shekhinah and of his own soul as
well. He restores the pristine perfection of his own spiritual body
… In redemption everything is restored to its place by the secret
magic of human acts...every commandment has its mystical aspect
whose observance creates a bond between the world of man and
the world of the world of the Sefirot...Thus fundamentally every
man and especially every Jew participates in the process of
tikkun.594
The Zohar calls the inward magic “an unalterable law.” Like cause and
effect, every action below impacts the worlds above. Gentiles are
encouraged to take part in the tikkun of ascent, rabbis have now been
granted permission to reveal the secrets of the Zohar and to have gentiles
study Kabbalah.601
However, only the spiritual masters can attain the knowledge of the names
of the god associated with the gateways of the Sefirot. In the pantheon of
the gods of the Sefirot tree, Metatron sits supreme at the top of Keter, the
crown. Metatron is the opener, holder of the keys of knowledge and the
gates of wisdom.602
Hidden just below the first three spheres of Keter, Hochmah, and Binah is
the sphere of Da’at, the abyss that separates the initiate from the crown. In
Kabbalah, the abyss of Da’at represents mankind’s loss of knowledge and
its Leviathan, the “Holy Serpent,” who will restore knowledge to humanity.
The Leviathan is a “Torah-code word for universal consciousness and
never-ending knowledge.”603
Leviathan is known as “the light of pure consciousness,” and the “God
consciousness” that will return Leviathan “full circle” to “the original light
of Genesis.” This will come in the form of the “New Torah” at the “ultimate
Feast of Knowledge” in the time to come (NWO).604
Leviathan is depicted as the ouroboros, the serpent eating its tail, and
represents the devouring serpent covering the earth. In theosophy, the area
inside the serpent circle represents the whole universe and everything in it.
It signifies the completion of an age and the return to Tikkun Olam, the
repair of the world.605
In Kabbalah, Leviathan is worshiped as the “Sacred Serpent” and is the
bridge across the abyss of Da’at that connects man to the divine. The final
unity of man and the nothingness of Ein Sof (singularity).
The “Sacred Serpent” is an inverted version of Revelation 9:1 & 11, the
beast depicted rising out of the sea of the abyss:
And the fifth angel sounded, and I saw a star fall from heaven unto
the earth: and to him was given the key of the bottomless pit. And
he opened the bottomless pit; 11. And they had a king over them,
which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the
Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name
Apollyon.606
According to Kabbalah, in time, all humanity will know 666 as the unity of
God in the One (singularity).613
NOAHIDE TO EVERYONE
We are living in what is being called, “The Fourth Revolution.” The rabbis
of Kabbalah say we are entering a paradigm shift; a time of “Mass Torah
Study for Gentiles.”614 Kabbalists say that the world is now ready for a
global awakening of consciousness.”615 The awakening will come through
Torah, and especially Kabbalah study, in order to obtain a revolutionary
shift in human consciousness, without which, the Messiah will not come.616
According to the rabbis, the coming of Moshiach (Messiah) and his
thousand-year reign of peace requires a convergence of Kabbalah and
science. This particular egregore (occult generated thought form) is
preparing humanity, especially dispensational Christians for: The Campaign
of Armageddon. The singularity project has constructed epistemic
communities to advance the dispensational narrative throughout the 20th
and 21st centuries.617
Armageddon will result in a restoration of “Adamic consciousness” when
all humanity will know the oneness of the creation with the creator. In order
for this to happen there must be a critical mass of initiates brought into the
secrets of Kabbalah through stealth and deception; “nothing less than a
world-wide conspiracy,”618 which includes, “the resurrection of the Sacred
Serpent, the Feast of Leviathan, and the revelation of Metatron.”619 In short,
the Kabbalistic vision of singularity requires one speech.
We live in a special time when the entire world is going through
very big and rapid changes … As Kabbalists explain, this is a sign
that the world is approaching the general correction … The only
remaining obstacle is language. If we do not speak the same
language, it is difficult to communicate because we are still in
Babylon. The ancient Babylonians started with one language, then
began to speak different languages, and as a result, ceased to
understand each other. We, accordingly, have to come from many
languages to one … the shattering, which occurred in the ancient
Babylon and is being revealed only today, manifests even more
clearly. This will further push us to unit. After all, we have to
return to Babylon so that the entire world becomes one village.620
We have argued that only human consciousness can open gateways between
worlds. However, biopower and technology are necessary to facilitate and
direct the singularity project.
As Adam Kadmon is the creator of earth Adam, man is also a reflection and
extension of the heavenly man, the perfected god-man image of the
tetragrammaton. The letters I, H, V, and H represent the different parts of
the image. The letter V (Vau) has a numerical value of 6, which corresponds
to the six-sided cube or hexagon of Microprosopus. The final H represents
Malkut, the Bride of Microsopus, who is Metatron, the god of this world.
Hence, cosmic inversion through the inversion of logos:
Just so, malkuth is the 10th Sehiroth, but as the “Bridge of
Microprosopus” or Tetragrammaton, who is hexameron - Malkuth,
or the material limb, is the seventh … She is the fourth letter
IHVH, or He, but the Logos, or son, is only the letter V (Vau …
Microprosopus - Tetragrammaton - the “Son” or Logos, is the
triangle in a square … the six-faced cube.631 (666)
Moreover,
The purpose of our work in gathering the exiles is to set up people
of Truth who will promote the unification of both meshichim in the
gates of Jerusalem so that the Shechina will return … In all
generations, the major tasks of the two meshichim … are self-
defense and to wage war against the three heads of the outer shells
or layers: Esau, Ismael, and the mixed multitude.637
Thus, the “secret” of “The Head of Esau” or “The beheading of Esau.” The
coded language of the rabbis is closely connected to the ongoing war
against Edom in the final redemption process.
Consider again the continuous war described by Michel Foucault.
According to Foucault, human affairs can be depicted as a biopolitical war
that does not lend itself to rational discourse.638 He says that “rumbling
away” beneath political power is a “silent,”639 “secret,”640 “primitive and
permanent,”641 war that consists of power relations between social groups.642
Initially, this discourse posited a racial binary consisting of two groups or
“races” at war with each other.643 However, by the 19th century, the “theory
of permanent race struggle” was no longer seen as binary; it was “recasted”
within the theory of evolutionism and the struggle for existence.”—no
longer an antagonism, but one “true race” (blockchain) from which certain
groups or individuals deviated. Foucault explains:
It will become the discourse of a battle that has to be waged not
between races, but by a race that is portrayed as the one true race,
the race that holds power and is entitled to define the norm, and
against those who deviate from that norm, against those who pose
a threat to the biological heritage.644
Thus, arises the conspiracy of the power elite to invert the fate of Esau and
Jacob—the plan to invert God’s final separation of the wheat and the tares648
—the plan that unfolds in the city of Sodom, and Egypt, where Christ was
crucified.
And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which
spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was
crucified.
According to the Zohar, this same light will be a destructive force to the
nations, as Israel is propelled to world domination. Scholem says,
The Gentiles (who are designated Esau or Edom), however, will
suffer the opposite fate. They received their lights in this world at a
single stroke, but it will depart from them gradually until Israel
shall grow strong and destroy them. And when the spirit of
uncleanliness shall pass from the world and the divine light shall
shine upon Israel without let or hindrance, all things will return to
the proper order—to the state of perfection … The worlds will all
be joined one to another and nothing will separate Creator from
creature. All will rise upward by ascents of the spirit, and creatures
will be purified until they behold the shekhinah ‘eye to eye.’650
Following the predictions of the Zohar, Higger notes that the redemption
will be a process of important reforms in which “wicked people” and
“unrighteous nations”—“traditional Edom and Rome” will disappear from
the earth, eventually ushering in the millennium and the establishment of
the Kingdom of God.660
Michel Foucault’s biopolitical account of human affairs foretells a war
between two races:
It will become the discourse of a battle that has to be waged not
between races, but by a race that is portrayed as the one true race,
the race that holds power and is entitled to define the norm, and
against those who deviate from that norm, against those who pose
a threat to the biological heritage.661
The egregore (spirit) over Earthly Jerusalem (NWO) has been granted an
independent influence over the affairs of the human population. This
influence concerns the fourth kingdom’s mixture of iron and clay.
The fourth kingdom (Earthly Jerusalem) is divided. It rules with iron, as the
Ancient Pharisees expected Yeshua to rule with a rod of iron. The iron will
rule over clay, humans (wheat) from the earth.668 The rod will crumble and
shatter the ten toes, which are a mixture of iron and clay.
The mixture of iron and clay concerns the enmity between the seed of the
woman and the seed of the serpent.669 The mixture of artificial intelligence
(AI)670 and human DNA is the critical feature of the rule of iron.
And whereas thou sawest the feet and toes, part of potters’ clay,
and part of iron, the kingdom shall be divided; but there shall be in
it of the strength of the iron, forasmuch as thou sawest the iron
mixed with miry clay.671
Artificial intelligence (AI), ie., quantum entanglement, is the seed that will
reappear in the affairs of man.672
That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair;
and they took them wives of all which they chose.
In Old French, the word contre, “counter or against,” together with the
word faire, “to make,” “joined together,” to mean “to make in imitation.”
The New World Order deception includes:
Counterfeit wisdom.674
Counterfeit Armageddon.675
Counterfeit Jerusalem.676
Counterfeit citizens.677
Counterfeit millennial reign678
Counterfeit singularity.679
And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and
whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and
whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
I know thy works: behold, I have set before thee an open door,
and no man can shut it: for thou hast a little strength, and hast kept
my word, and hast not denied my name.
OceanofPDF.com
CONCLUSION