Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CONSTRUCTING-AND-PERFORMING-THE-ODISSI-BODY
CONSTRUCTING-AND-PERFORMING-THE-ODISSI-BODY
CONSTRUCTING-AND-PERFORMING-THE-ODISSI-BODY
net/publication/331199244
CITATIONS READS
0 1,142
1 author:
Aastha Gandhi
Ambedkar University Delhi
7 PUBLICATIONS 2 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
In Dutt, Sahai and Reneilt (eds.) Gendered Citizenship: Manifestations and Performance. Palgrave Macmillan. London. 2017 View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Aastha Gandhi on 19 February 2019.
Aastha Kumar
Independent Research Scholar
Institutional Affiliation: Jawaharlal Nehru University
Post- independence, the image of the Indian woman became an essential marker of
the Hindu cultural identity, which further defined the image for the emerging dancing
body; the auspicious, civilized body invoking, practicing and representing all that is
“pure” and “sanctified”. It is in this respect that we need to see and understand the re-
construction of Indian classical dances, specifically Odissi dance, as the area of study in
this research.
The dancing body of the woman had already shifted from the popular space of mela
(carnival) or the ritual space of the temples to a more “dignified” and secular space,
respectively, with codifying of Bharatanatyam in 1930’s. Deriving from the colonial idea
of civilized entertainment; the proscenium stage, best suited for the middle/ upper class
woman had by now taken on the role of the preserver and mediators of Indian culture.
Under the aegis of two concurrent movements, ignited by the nationalists as part of the
Indian independence struggle to claim the position of Indian culture vis- a- vis that of the
west cleansing of the lowly practices and resurrection of the ‘pure’ upper caste
for civilization and culture was much influenced by the western notions of a civilized
society, intended to do away with the “obscure” and “sexual”, which was mainly
associated with the lower caste, and with the popular and the frivolous, as a part of the
revivalist movement (Gupta, 2001; 105). The respectable values of the middle and
upper class, then- on, emphasized on the domestic domain as the core of spirituality;
the woman of the house was given the position of sole custodian of Hindu ethics and
her image was portrayed against that of outspoken, self- indulgent, western- educated
woman, on one hand and the brash folk woman on the other (Sarkar, 2003; 35).
accepted and learnt feminine ideals. As feminist theories have suggested body is not a
passive object; it is rather a lived body, a situated subject, and a confluence of both
materialist/ biological body and cultural practices. It is an active being which inhabits the
gendered spaces and identities, such that the feminine ideals and sexual orders are
mediated through the body. However, embodying the roles is not a pre- decided,
deliberate effort on the part of the subject, instead, “the subject who enacts gender, in
(Neeranjana, 2001; 123). Thus, the discourses live in and through the body. Also, the
notions of “proper” feminine body mark boundaries for the “ideal” female body, as
It is in this light that one needs to understand the developing Odissi body placed in
the urban arena of the upper/ middle classes. “Space is not a mere site of action; in
fact, the social is always constituted through the spatial, with the experience of the lived
115). Even though the body was that of an educated, city- bred, urban woman, the
elements constituting the performance, clearly marked the difference in hers being an
auspicious and refined body, as opposed to the inauspicious one. Thus the adornment
auspiciousness, and refining it according to the costume designed for and adopted by
Bharatanatyam practitioners, became the norm. Anything other than this norm or
beyond the codes laid down by the Gurus was strictly considered “impure” and became
under this axis of polarity, many concepts and ideologies defining Odissi become
clearer.
The proscenium space is in itself a profane space, politico- economic realm of which
was concealed under the ritualised guise2. It is also the female body and
“auspiciousness” as embodied and represented by her body, which extends into the
1
Odissi costume includes a bright silk sari, worn as five- piece stitched costume, by majority of the dancers, along
with heavy elaborate jewellery including a choker, a longer necklace, armlets, bracelets, a belt, anklets, bells,
earrings, a piece placed on the bun, a seenthi (a piece placed on the hair and forehead) and tahia (the headgear).
all” event. Diya (the lamp) or a rangoli (a traditional motif made from colours) in the foyer, marks the change in
space. It is no more the profane space of a proscenium, with the sole purpose of entertainment. All these elements
aim at taking the performance space to another level, which is not profane and not yet sacred.
in this space.
the hip4, becomes the basic posture and all movements are derived
from, flow into or end in it. Chauka (Figure II) is a more rooted basic
3
Gotipua: In Oriya colloquial language Gotipua means single boy. The dance performance done by a single boy is
known as Gotipua dance. When decadence and declination came in to Devadasi or mahari tradition due to various
reasons this Gotipua dance tradition evolved around 15th- 16th c. It was performed outside the temple precincts.
Odissi style as propagated by Guru Kelucharana Mohapatra, and many others, derive their influence from this dance.
4
The deflection varies for different styles. In some styles it is the isolation of the torso which is emphasized whereas
in others the jutting out of the hip is considered to be appropriate to achieve desired distancing from the central axis.
5
Griva Bheda (neck movements) as prescribed by the Natyasastra are; sundari, tiraschinaa, parivartita,
pratampita. When the chin leads the movement of the head, towards left or right, and the head is tilted in the
practiced natural for the dancer and the dancer is able to associate her expressive self
It was just the dance form and its presentation, which depicted the traditional,
whereas the social body of the dancer was completely situated in the modern lifestyle,
which required a professional outlook towards one’s chosen career and the stipulated
power plays necessary in garnering a much-desired economic and social leverage. This
was made achievable through one’s class, political affiliations, and maneuverability in
international circuits. Observing the list of pioneering divas of Odissi dance who had
their familial background and influential status played a significant role in determining
recognition for the dance form itself. This list would roughly include Indrani Rehman-
Daughter of Kathakali, and Bharatanatyam dancer Ragini Devi6 (Esther Sherman, 1896-
1982).
Indrani received training in dance from her mother, Prof. U.S. Krishna Rao and
Pandanallur Chokkalingam Pillai. Mainly, inspired by her mother to learn Odissi, she
was later encouraged by Dr. Charles Fabri to propagate the emerging form; “we both
toured the State and accumulated a lot of experience in Odissi dance form. When we
were back in Delhi, we resolved to get this dance its due place among the classical
6
“I found myself cast in the role of a pioneer with a mission to revive the classical dance in India”; Ragini Devi
popularizing this dance form was very big indeed” (Misra, 1992; 10). She was also
crowned as Miss. India for the year 1952. After she had learnt a few Odissi items from
Guru Deba Prasad Das, she started including them in her performances from 1957
onwards7. If her mother, Ragini Devi played a pioneering role in taking Kathakali and
Bharatanatyam to places, it was Indrani who walked the same steps, thirty years later,
Sonal Mansingh- Described as “the most persuasive ambassador for Indian dance”
(Misra, 1992; 117) was born into an influential family. Her grandfather was one of the
early governors of free India, and she was introduced to dance by her mother, who was
a keen student of music. Some of the great contemporary artists of the time were
frequent guests at their home. Her tryst with dance began with Manipuri, then
Bharatanatyam under Prof. U. S. Krishna Rao and his dancer- wife Chandrabhaga Devi.
She presented her Bharatanatyam arengatram in Bangalore in 1961, when she was just
17 years old. The entire cabinet, dance teachers, royalty and artists bore witness to the
recital. She learnt music too and later received training in Kuchipudi from Guru Vempati
Chinna Satyam but never included it in her performances8. She learnt Odissi on her
father- in- law’s insistence, Dr. Mayadhar Man Singh, under his friend Guru Kelucharan
Mohapatra from 1964 onwards. From 1968 onwards, she was representing the country,
7
The brochure of her performance in Lucknow, in 1965, mentions; “she has danced in all the five continents as a
secular and more directed towards popular entertainment. It is better suited for dance- dramas” Sonal Mansingh
and Ram Narayan along with the then Prime Minister of the country, Smt. Indira
Gandhi9. She chose a career in dance over the role of a diplomat. She continued her
Odissi training under Guru Mayadhar Raut, whence Guru Kelucharan Mahapatra, being
Sanjukta Panigrahi hailed from an orthodox Brahmin Oriya family. Her mother had
gained an appreciation of art from her own family who were deeply interested in the
Chhau dances. She was trained under Guru Keluchran Mahapatra, joined Kalakshetra
at the age of eight years and thereafter learnt Kathak, for some duration under Guru
She was giving Bharatanatyam performances while continuing with her training in
Odissi under Guru Kelucharan Mahapatra. On the insistence of Dr. Charles Fabri, she
Kiran Segal is a leading exponent of Odissi dance. She was initiated in dance by her
mother Zohra Segal. Following whose footsteps she was trained in Uday Shankar style
Madhavi Mudgal was born into a family of artists. She received her initial training in
institutes in Delhi, which was set up by her father in 1939. She continued to perform
Kathak for a while and then completely engaged herself in the practice of Odissi dance,
9
An entourage organized by I.C. C. R to accompany the Prime Minister was sent and then later in 1970 she was sent
Kelucharan Mohapatra.
Visibly, the dance form came to be practiced mainly by urban middle/ upper class
women, many of who were already practitioners of other classical forms, and had well
established themselves as dancer. If not formerly trained, they were sent specifically to
acquire training in Bharatanatyam or Kathak, (as in the case of Sanjukta Panigrahi) after
a basic training in Odissi, which wasn’t yet formalized, to come back and apply a similar
mechanism to its structure and became the new authors of the Odissi body. These are
the women who had strong political affiliations or had already made their mark as
artists.
Given such familial backgrounds, one needs to draw an overview of the festivals
these young divas were performing at, the sponsors and the patrons for such high-
profile programs. They were performing for domestic cultural festivals, predominantly for
and official entourage of the state, to an international diplomatic sphere aimed to build
the image of the nation. They were often sent for international congregations or for
welcoming foreign dignitaries in the state sponsored festivals10. It was these young
women, educated in the western system, yet well versed in Indian culture, who actively
10
Refer to Sangeet Natak Akademi journals and annual reports of the Akademi for the performances in the formative
years, exclusively organized for international VIP’s or for ‘festival of India’ series in international arenas. (Khokar,
but, also, holding demonstrations and teaching Odissi outside Orissa and abroad- with
the support of the government, they were propagated and recognized as the icons of
the emerging nation, complying with and propagating Nehruvian idea of a modern India.
The Gurus were mostly accompanying their students to international platforms and
important festive spaces within the country, as a Guru, guide and percussionist. It was
much later, with much coaxing on the part of their students that they came back to the
stage as a full- fledged performer12. It is often acknowledged that the Gurus later
Panigrahi and Guru Kelucharan Mahapatra and Indrani Rehman and Guru Debaprasad
They represented not just any other dancing body but an age- old civilization, a
philosophy, a value system. However, the role of this oriental body was not merely
11
Indrani Rehman was the first to be titled as the “cultural ambassador of India”, the likes of Sanjukta Panigrahi and
Even his teaching conveyed an in- depth study of the subject. I used to tell him that you have to perform this
ashtapadi, he said “no, I have left it (stage performance) now”. I told him “you must do it and we have a stage right
here”, and that’s when he performed after a very long time. A: When was this? Madhavi: 1970 or ’73, or earlier. I
am not really good with dates. That is when he performed for the first time and then at Kamani, a full fledged one
night of performance, and then slowly of course all over the world” (conversation with Madhavi Mudgal on Guru
the Gurus, who did not have influential backgrounds, lacked comprehensiveness and
communicative skills in foreign languages and were not compatible with the nationalist
image of India, which revered itself in the new feminine avataar of “Bharatmata”13. It
was the dancers who organized these tours and the Gurus accompanied them as
percussionists. The notion of the feminine body cannot be rooted out; it was the female
dancers who completely took on the multicultural, global stage, barring a few such as
Uday Shankar, Ram Gopal and Guru Gopinath; for this reason it was female dancers
who became the cultural representatives of the nation, as against male gurus. It was
through their name and fame that a new dance form was hailed and received a strong
appreciation from local and international audiences, and was immediately conferred
Undoubtedly, it raises a crucial question; whether it is the dancer, which maketh the
Gurus, since early days, i.e. in 1950’s, occupied the position of revivalists, the
founders of the form. The first generation dancers were perceived as subordinates,
hardly ever identified as those contributing equally to the creation of the dance form.
13
The country’s image was eulogized in the form of a Goddess, which started as a movement in 19 th c. and was
adopted in shaping nationalist image through cultural practices; visual, literary and performance, post independence
Mahapatra, (instead of a senior artist like Guru Pankaj Charan Das, who was former’ s Guru, nor even to Guru Deba
Prasad Das who had been involved in popularising Odissi internationally) that Odissi was finally accepted as a
“classical” form.
face of young, exuberant nation, the codes and rules were still formulated by the Gurus,
confining the role of the dancers to that of mere carriers of an ancient legacy.15
To ponder further on this subject, two major interventions in the history of Odissi
need to be looked into. Firstly, Indrani Rehman’s entry into an international beauty
contest, as the first Miss. India, in the year 1952 and secondly, Sanjukta Panigrahi’s
“experimental explorations” at Odin Teatret, from 1980- 1996, and the interventions with
Indrani Rehman was chosen as the first Miss. India, by Indian press, to participate in
the first ever Miss. Universe pageant in the year 1952. Her photographs in classical
15
So much so, that they were not even recognized as “Gurus”. It is very rarely that an Odissi dancer/ teacher would
use “Guru” as a prefix to her name, even after devoting a substantial part of her life to dance, whereas the male
dancers started using “Guru” as a prefix much earlier in their careers or were granted the same from their Gurus.
Minati Mishra, one of the senior- most Odissi dancers, also served as the Principal of Utkal Sangeet Mahavidyalaya,
where Guru Deba Prasad Das and Guru Pankaj Charan Das were employed as teachers under her, she was not
allowed to use the title (in conversation with Dinanath Pathy, Pathy, 2006; 82) .
Perhaps because at the time, when she headed the institute Gurus were still present and teaching. The rules of the
form were strictly bound by them. However, it is only now that dancer- teachers like Aruna Mohanty, Sujata
Mohapatra, Sujata Mishra, Sangeeta Dash, Bijayani Satpathy are recognized as Gurus by their students, and have
worked to attain this position, and run their own institutes to propagate Odissi language, but yet not conferred the
Sanjukta Panigrahi , in an interview with Susheela Mishra; “The young men are better teachers because they are also
trained in Pakhavaj- playing.” (Misra, 1992; 133- 134). Young male dancers were referred to as Gurus much earlier
by their teachers; the Gurus, for obvious reasons of indicating the carriers of lineage of their parampara.
Souza, 1999). She not only represented a pristine beauty, well mannered in western
etiquettes under her mother’s guidance, with an unmatched stage presence, but also a
body which represented the most ancient classical dance form of India- Odissi. A
woman, who moved around in the most elite and affluent circles of the country, she was
already an established personality before she embarked on the path of learning and
popularising Odissi dance. She represented the image of an ideal Indian woman
entrenched in traditional systems, with a modern outlook, who carved a niche for herself
in the social and political circles of the country, through her art. It is interesting to note
why an Odissi practitioner was selected as Miss.India. It is the dance form that claims to
portray femininity in its most beautiful, pure and divine form and its direct inheritance
from temple sculptures add to its mystique. The Odissi body was thoughtfully carved to
depict the cultural values and codes valorised by the upper caste. Why a dancer
practising any other dance form was not chosen, is the question that arises here. Firstly,
Indrani’s being the most prominent name in the influential circuits, secondly the Odissi
body offered much more agile and curvilinear postures, as opposed to Bharatanatyam’s
taut and upright structure, which made Odissi’s imagery more appealing for the specific
requirement of such a beauty pageant, can be speculated as a few reasons for her
acquiring the title, in spite of the fact that she was already married and hence, one is left
pondering how was she legally legible for the title. Also, Odissi had just “arrived” around
this time; a newly discovered, fresh imagery of dance, not only attracted rave reviews
but also provided a much wider scope for manoeuvrability and usage for the body
dancing it. It was a mutual course where not just the dancer but also the dance form
stands to benefit from those practicing it. It was Indrani’s crowning as Miss.India, and
Beginning in 1980, after her first meeting with Eugineo Barba in 1977, over the time,
Sanjukta Panigrahi collaborated with him and other artists on various projects. With an
objective of understanding his own tradition, by placing it in confrontation with that of the
others’, Eugineo placed together artists with different cultural backgrounds with the
played the role of a primary dancer from Asia for more than a decade and even served
as a member of its pedagogical committee. She collaborated with Barba and other
artists from around the world for various projects, from 1980 to 1996 before her demise
in 1997. She even directed western actors for “Shakuntala among the Olive Trees”
(1993) that involved, Opera singers, Odin actors, Odissi dancers, musicians and
performers from different cultures and styles, with the central idea being the rediscovery
of a collaboration, where “Barba was to divulge into the literary classic (Kalidasa’s
the purpose of finding different points of encounter between eastern and western forms,
16
“The Odin Teatret, which continues to produce new and exciting works, was originally formed in Oslo, Norway,
in 1964. In 1966 the company moved to Holstebro, a small town near the west coast of Denmark, where it has been
based ever since. In its 23-year history the company has mounted productions ranging from intimate studio pieces,
for audiences as small as sixty or less, to huge street spectacles encapsulating whole villages at a time… and it is the
only state-supported pedagogical institute devoted to theatre research in Western Europe.” (Watson, 1988; 49)
to create this production (Scheno, 1996; 93). The presence of a "collective mind"
comprising of some thirty scholars and directors who collaborated in Barba's work and
the idea, above all, was of a journey in various stages. This gives an overview of the
work Sanjukta was engaged in, at the Odin, where she used Odissi as her technical
base but digressed to explore it in different contexts- work demonstrations at ISTA, for
theoretical research, working through the Odissi body in the absence of a narrative,
improvisations, engaging with the form at the level of minimal textual support and
collaborating with other bodies trained in diverse techniques, not at all acquainted with
the Odissi grammar. Her body was placed in such experimental sites, which no other
Odissi body had ventured into, till then. (Refer to Photograph II at the end of the
research paper).
One needs to question overruling the possibility of using other Indian traditional
dance forms, in place of Odissi.17 Given the presence of Odissi at Odin Teatret, one
ponders on how does the performing body and its structure confront such encounters
between eastern and western forms? How did Sanjukta Panigrahi, an Oriya woman,
engaged in the practice of dance since childhood, trained under the most renowned
Guru of Odissi dance, fill up that space? What kind of interjections, did this endeavor,
17
Barba did invite some of the most prominent names of Kathakali, but only for a few engagements, his main study
and experimentations dealt with Indian Odissi and Japanese Buyo from the East.
observing the division of the body, the shift in the centre of gravity and attainment of the
equilibrium in the asymmetrical body. He drew analysis of the principles working in Noh,
Buyo, Odissi, Balinese dance, Kathakali along with few forms from the west. However,
in most of his collaborative projects, namely, Faust, Shakuntala, Jungle Book etc. it was
Katsuko Azuma, Japanese Buyo dancer, along with Sanjukta Panigrahi, trained in
Indian Odissi, who represented the dance forms of the “Oriental East”. The two bodies
used different methods of applying opposing forces and tension generating dynamics, in
the body. (Refer to Photograph III at the end of the research paper).
By this time Odissi had established itself into a solo based performance, whereas till
the 1960s- 70s, as was the trend, the dancers used to present individual items from
several forms in a single classical dance recital18. It was with Sanjukta Panigrahi that
Secondly, Odissi carried the notion of a typical Oriental dance form, belonging to the
ancient temple walls, adding to its mystique. The principle of opposing forces between
upper and lower body, took a very distinct shape in Odissi’s tribhangi, missing from
Bharatanatyam’s araimandi and Kathakali’s asana (mainly upright and taught basic
18
“In 1960s and 1970s when Odissi had just come about, 60’s in fact was just the beginning. Indrani Rehman used
to present one Kuchipudi item, one Bharatanatyam, one Odissi and one Mohiniattam. That kind of trend was there,
Yamini Krishnamurthy followed, then Sanjukta Panigrahi and Sonal Mansingh bought Odissi as a full- fledged, full-
length evening recital. Priyambada Mohanty was of course the first one to present it. That was the beginning.” (In
opposite a Japanese Buyo dancer, to observe the movement negotiations between the
Odissi was a form which was available for experimentation, unlike other Indian classical
dances which had more stern boundaries and history, because it had already been
The involvement of the primary Odissi danseuse, along with her Guru (Guru
Kelucharan Mohapatra), lent legitimacy to the project. For Barba it was Odissi in its
most authentic form, Sanjukta’s dancing body provided a final stamp of validity, with the
approval of her Guru and his presence at the ISTA. One can only speculate the reaction
Barba intended to decodify the original structures and view their interactions when
placed in western thematics. The Odissi body, along with Buyo, provided an ideal tool to
scene19.
19
“His Faust returns finally to its point of departure: a Western vision conveyed by Eastern traditions reworked by a
Western director ending up with a sketch which bears all the distinguishing features of Western mis-en-scene. This
unification is realized also by the neutralization of one theatrical and cultural tradition by another, by the discovery
of transcultural values, by "the constant factor in cultural variation"… The neutralization is also achieved by
frequent parodies of one codification by another-for example, when Azuma (playing Faust) drunkenly attempts
mudras imitating Panigrahi (playing Mephisto). The parody of one form by another implies the ability to imitate, but
Gurus, only in the international “experimental” space, which was not regulated by
traditional strictures, and hence did not pose a threat either to the sanctity of the form,
or to the dancing body20. The ideologies of the parampara exercised a stronghold on the
dancers, and “safeguarded the form against such threats.” Consequently, such works,
or even their later performances, did not find much espousal in the domestic sphere, of
teaching, practicing and performance, which was more regulated and constricted in its
functioning.
It then becomes essential to look at what was designated as the canonized Odissi
body; imbibed, endorsed and disseminated by the first generation dancers. Who were
above all to quote, rewrite, in short, to appropriate. This parody can easily become metatextual, since it implies a
reflection on forms and the means of surpassing them.” (Pavis, 52- 53 ibid)
20
Sanjukta Panigrahi, with her Guru, Kelucharan Mohapatra in an interview with Richard Schechner;
MAHAPATRA [speaking in English]: So many things, so many ideas from experiments. New ideas come in, new
points. Some new idea comes in; I introduce it into my Odissi dance. [In Oriya, translated] I am a director. I go
around the world and I see many things. Many things come into my mind. I am always experimenting, all the time.
While experimenting I may do correct things, I may do wrong things, but when I do something that satisfies me,
then I present it. But how you present it finally, that is different. In every age, every artist carries the tradition
further. So every artist has the right to create but within the basic technical framework, according to his or her own
cultural traditions.
SCHECHNER: But how does Guruji feel about what you did with Eugenio yesterday, Sanjukta?
S. PANIGRAHI: It's all right as an experiment, but if I do this on the stage before an ordinary public, he'll kill me.
which could be explored and experimented with, under the consent of the Gurus? Who
were the dancers delving into such explorations? In what ways did they try to expand
the canon? What were the interactions with the Guru during such an experimental
course? What lead dancers to frequently change their Gurus, sometimes even shifting
from one style of Odissi to another? How does the technique, then become over-
structure, to the “authentic” mould and yet confront a constant need to go beyond the
prescribed limitations and to explore something new. Pathy identifies this as a tension
between the “representation” and the “canon”, between the two lies the “politics of
the reason for this tension in a multicultural society, which influences and changes the
expectations that the spectators have from a dance performance. Such cultural
over literary canon and curriculum, which “causes stress over the defining and control of
An Oriya dancer, Sanjukta Panigrahi was herself breaking bonds and performing on
modern poetry, she was also dancing to Bengali, Maithili and songs in Braj boli. Her
experimentations at ISTA for the “Theatrum Mundi” project, called for an interaction with
other dance and theatre forms. “In such performances the choreograph is abstract and
the actions are expressive. Sanjukta, after performing and participating in these
to make the dance form really international, multi- lingual and multi- cultural” (ibid; 297).
Even though the first generation of Odissi dancers came from similar urban
academically; their primary concern was with upliftment and proliferation of the form to
establish it as a “classical” dance. They grew into the “divas” of Odissi and still retain
that position. They strictly adhered to the Guru’s teachings and consequently their
choreographic ventures were limited to the format established by the Gurus and
accepted in the market. The performance space available to them is more often a
defined, artificially created, ethno- cultural space for representing “Indian Culture” at
With the traditional repertoire, which had no solid grounding in the living traditions,
structure of the form became evident. Few of the first generation dancers ventured into
moulding space and music through dance, to inculcate other forms and languages in
their group and solo compositions, or the age- old theme based, narrative dance-
contemporary and social, these experiments often proved futile with no landmark
expansion in the technique and grammar of Odissi. The people who had the advantage
of being the first few to introduce Odissi on stage became the pioneers, while others
who learnt at the same time or a little later, by virtue of coming to the proscenium at a
time when Odissi no longer was a “new” dance, were actually re-performing, and not
as Rekha Tandon21, Ananya Chatterjee22, directly trained under the pioneers, issues
regarding the freedom to explore beyond the marked territories become important. As
genres and performance histories they also had to live up to the expectations of a multi-
cultural audience. Most of the young prominent Odissi dancers of today, with the likes of
Madhumita Raut, Reela Hota, Sharmila Mukherjee debate that the form must evolve
with time, with varying audiences and society. It has to adapt to the exigencies of
changing times.23 This further propels them to question about tradition being accepted
from which new texts can be written, new vocabularies can be created? Does that mean
that it is acceptable to talk about these as boundaries? Can one then negotiate with
these boundaries? Is the dance then living up to its ultimate goal of liberating the body?
Tradition is not any more taken to be a fixed structure, which one apes, without
actually understanding and imbibing it. This can be achieved only through claiming
“ownership” of the tradition, by making new work within the traditional structures and
What then becomes an area of tension is that which “experiments” are accepted as
the expansion of the canon and receive the Gurus’ consent and what evolutions are
21
Rekha Tandon was trained in Odissi dance under Guru Surendranath Jena, Madhavi Mudgal and Guru Kelucharan
Mohapatra.
22
Ananya Chatterjee was trained in Odissi dance under Sanjukta Panigrahi.
23
Stated in interviews conducted by the author as part of the research work in 2008.
“politics of interpretation and interpreters”. With their training in modern dance, the latter
dancers tend to explore these spaces and the form through a different dynamic
structure. They don’t have any positions of pioneers to be taken over. They can either
fill up the dormant spaces following the same conventional, accepted route or carve out
newer spaces by redefining the vocabulary, by creating their own texts through the base
Photographs:
Photograph I: Guru Pratibha Jena seen here in an Photograph II: Sanjukta Panigrahi and Eugenio Barba, 8th ISTA,
elaborate Odissi costume and jewelery Londrina (Brazil), 1994.
(Photo courtesy: Guru Pratibha Jena) (Photo courtesy: Odin Teatret Archives; www.odinteatretarchive.dk)
Books:
Desmond, J. (2003). Meaning in Motion. London: Duke University Press.
Sangari, K., & Suresh V. (2006). Recasting Women: Essays in Colonial History. New
Delhi: Zubaan.
Foster, S. (2003). Dancing Bodies. In J.C. Desmond (Ed.) Meaning in Motion (pp. 235-
257). London: Duke University Press.
Barba, E. (1998). Sanjukta Panigrahi- 1944- 1997. The Drama Review, Vol. 42,
2, 5- 8. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1146697.
Barba, E. (2002). The Essence of Theatre. The Drama Review, Vol. 46, 3, 12- 30.
Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1146994.
Chatterjee, A. (1996). Training in Indian Classical Dance: A Case Study. Asian Theatre
Journal, Vol. 13,1, 68- 91. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1124303.
Hewitt, J. R., Bent H. & Eugenio B. (1969). A Sectarian Theatre: An Interview with
Eugenio Barba. The Drama Review: TDR, Vol. 14,1, 55- 59. Retrieved from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/1144505.
Pathy, D. (2007). Some Thoughts on Odissi Dance. Sangeet Natak, Vol. XLI, 2.
Schino M. & Sykes L. (1996). Shakuntala among the Olive Trees. Asian Theatre
Journal, Vol. 13, 1, 92-11. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1124304.
Thesis/ Dissertation:
Tandon, Rekha. (2005). Classicism on the Threshold of Modernity: Expanding the
Physical Parameters of Odissi Dance for Contemporary Audiences. Unpublished
Ph.D thesis, London: Laban, City University.
D’ Souza, P. (1999). In Memorium. The Rediff Special. Retrieved from www. rediff.com.