Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kolb & Whishaw (2015) - Fundamentals of Human Neuropsychology, Chapter 6 - The Influence of Drugs and Hormones on Behavior
Kolb & Whishaw (2015) - Fundamentals of Human Neuropsychology, Chapter 6 - The Influence of Drugs and Hormones on Behavior
Kolb & Whishaw (2015) - Fundamentals of Human Neuropsychology, Chapter 6 - The Influence of Drugs and Hormones on Behavior
Thus began a scientific detective story. Patient 1 neurons taken from human fetal brains at autopsy
was one of seven adults hospitalized at about the were implanted into his caudate nucleus and putamen
same time in California. All showed symptoms of se- (Widner et al., 1992). Patient 1 had no serious postop-
vere Parkinson’s disease that appeared very suddenly erative complications and his condition improved after
after injecting synthetic heroin sold on the streets in 24 months. He could dress and feed himself, visit the
the summer of 1982. bathroom with help, and make trips outside his home.
J. William Langston (2008) and colleagues found a He responded much better to medication. The MRIs
contaminant called MPTP (1-methyl-4-phenyl-1, 2, 3, contrast DA levels in the brain of a Parkinson’s patient
6-tetrahydropyridine) in the heroin, the result of poor before (left) and 28 months after implantation (right).
preparation during synthesis. Experimental results in This scientific detective story resulted in impor-
rodents showed that MPTP was not itself responsible tant discoveries for neuropsychology. The drug MPTP
for the patients’ symptoms but was metabolized into became a new tool for producing animal models of
MPP1 (1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium), a neurotoxin. Parkinson’s disease. The search for environmental
The autopsy of one individual who was suspected of compounds that can mimic MPTP’s effects revealed
having died of MPTP poisoning showed that the victim that certain pesticides and herbicides might cause
suffered a selective loss of dopamine (DA) neurons in some cases of Parkinson’s disease. The finding that
the substantia nigra. The rest of the brain appeared grafting neural tissue into the brain of a relatively
healthy. Injecting MPTP into monkeys, rats, and mice young person can be beneficial sustains the prom-
produced similar symptoms and a similar selective loss ise that damaged brains can be restored. Finally, that
of DA neurons in the substantia nigra. a drug can quickly and selectively damage the brain
In 1988, Patient 1 received an experimental treat- raised suspicion that many drugs and related com-
ment at University Hospital in Lund, Sweden. DA pounds have unsuspected neurotoxic actions.
139
140 Part I Bac kg r ou n d
The study of how drugs affect the nervous system and behavior—
psychopharmacology—is the subject of this chapter. We begin by looking
at ways in which drugs are administered, what routes they take to reach the
central nervous system, how they are eliminated from the body, and how they
act at the synapse. We next group psychoactive drugs based on their major be-
havioral effects, and then examine individual responses and addiction. Many
drug-related principles apply to the action of hormones, the chapter’s clos-
ing topic.
In considering how drugs produce their effects on the brain, take caution:
the sheer number of neurotransmitters, receptors, and possible sites of drug ac-
tion is astounding. Psychopharmacology research has made important advances,
but neuroscientists do not know everything there is to know about any drug.
6.1 Principles of Psychopharmacology
A drug is a chemical compound administered to bring about some desired
change in the body. Usually drugs are used to diagnose, treat, or prevent illness;
to relieve pain and suffering; or to improve an adverse physiological condition.
Throughout human history, drugs have also been used as food, for recreation,
even as poisons. Today, they are also used as research tools.
Psychoactive drugs are substances that act to alter mood, thought, or be-
havior, are used to manage neuropsychological illness, and may be abused.
Some psychoactive drugs can also act as toxins, producing sickness, brain dam-
age, or death.
To reach a neurological target, a drug must also travel from the blood into
the extracellular fluid. This part of the journey requires that the drug mol-
ecules be small enough to pass through the pores of capillaries, the tiny vessels
that carry blood to the body’s cells. Even if the drug makes this passage, it en-
counters other obstacles. The extracellular fluid’s volume of roughly 35 liters
of water dilutes the drug even further, and if it passes through cell membranes,
the drug is at risk of being modified or destroyed by various metabolic processes
taking place in the cells.
Figure 6.2 c Capillaries in the brain form tight Small, uncharged Certain other
Blood–Brain Barrier junctions and are covered with molecules are able molecules
Capillaries in most of the astrocyte feet. These properties to pass through are carried across
body allow for the passage of prevent materials from moving in the endothelial the membrane by
substances across capillary and out easily. membrane. active transport.
cell membranes, but those in
the brain, stimulated by the
actions of astrocytes, form the Amino
tight junctions of the blood– CO2 O2 acids Glucose Fats +
brain barrier.
Transporter
Astrocyte
feet CO2 O2
–
Capillaries in the body have
few tight junctions. Materials Capillary
can easily move in and out. Astrocyte feet Tight junction
Pituitary gland: The capillary cell walls in the three brain regions shown in Figure 6.3 lack
Entry of chemicals a blood–brain barrier. The pituitary gland of the hypothalamus secretes many
that influence hormones into the blood, and other hormones carried to the pituitary gland
pituitary hormones. by the blood trigger their release. The absence of a blood–brain barrier at the
Area postrema: area postrema of the lower brainstem allows toxic substances in the blood to
Entry of toxic trigger a vomiting response. The pineal gland also lacks a blood–brain barrier
substances that and is therefore open to the hormones that modulate the day–night cycles this
induce vomiting. gland controls.
Chapter 6 The Influence of Drugs and Hormones on Behavior §6.2 143
Tolerance
A dramatic example of tolerance—the decline in response to the repeated ad-
ministration of a drug—was described by H. Isbell and coworkers (1955) for a
(A) Procedure group of prisoner volunteers. These researchers gave the participants enough
alcohol daily in a 13-week period to keep them in a constant
state of intoxication (Figure 6.6A). Yet they found that the
Participants were given participants did not stay drunk for 3 months straight.
alchohol every day for
13 weeks—enough to
In the first days of the experiment, participants showed
keep them intoxicated. rapidly rising levels of blood alcohol and behavioral signs
of intoxication after consuming alcohol, as shown in the top
graph in Figure 6.6B. Between the twelfth and twentieth
(B) Results
days, however, blood-alcohol concentrations and the signs
of intoxication fell (middle graph), even though the partici-
Alcohol intake
began, all the These results were the products of three different kinds
participants increased
200 of tolerance:
their intake of alcohol.
1. Metabolic tolerance develops from an increase in
0 5 10 15 20 enzymes needed to break down alcohol in the liver,
blood, and brain. As a result, the body metabo-
After 15–20 days of lizes alcohol more quickly, so blood-alcohol levels
Average blood-alcohol
alcohol consumption,
blood-alcohol levels
are reduced.
level (mg/ml)
…and the signs of 3. Learned tolerance also contributes to the drop in out-
3 intoxication fell, ward signs of intoxication. As people learn to cope with
Average degree
In the Robinson and Becker study, animals In the Whishaw study, animals were given
were given periodic injections of the different numbers of swims after being
same dose of amphetamine. Then the injected with flupentixol. Then the
researchers measured the number of researchers measured their speed to
times each rat reared in its cage. escape to a platform in a swimming pool.
Agonist Antagonist
Amphetamine Flupentixol
Release
enhanced
Reuptake
Receptor
transporter
Dopamine blocked
blocked
Flupentixol
Conclusion
Sensitization induced by repeated exposure to Can Drugs Cause Brain Damage?
amphetamine changes the structure of neurons. As exemplified in the opening Portrait, drugs of abuse can cause
brain damage in humans, but determining which drugs do so
Figure 6.8 m is difficult. It is hard to sort out other life experiences from drug-taking ex-
Psychoactive Drugs and periences, to determine genetic susceptibility to drugs, and to identify subtle
Plasticity Rats that show sen- changes, even when they are associated with repeated drug use. Many natural
sitization to amphetamine (or to substances can act as neurotoxins; Table 6.2 lists some of them. These sub-
cocaine) undergo increased den- stances cause brain damage by acting in myriad ways, including poisoning meta-
dritic growth and increased spine
density compared with saline- bolic pathways, blocking synaptic action, and altering development.
treated control rats. (Data from In the late 1960s, many reports circulated linking monosodium glutamate,
Robinson and Kolb, 1997, p. 8495.) MSG, a salty-tasting, flavor-enhancing food additive, to headaches in some peo-
ple. In the process of investigating this effect, scientists placed MSG on cultured
neurons or injected it into the brains of experimental animals
and found it produced neuron death. These findings raised the
question of whether large doses of the neurotransmitter gluta-
mate, which MSG resembles structurally, might also be toxic to
neurons in some circumstances. It turned out that it is.
Glutamate-receptor activation results in an influx of Ca21
into the cell. Excessive Ca21 may, through second messengers,
Monosodium glutamate
activate a “suicide gene” in a cell’s DNA leading to apoptosis,
(MSG) Glutamate cell death that is genetically programmed. The discovery of this
Domoic acid mechanism led to the understanding that a drug might be toxic
148
Chapter 6 The Influence of Drugs and Hormones on Behavior §6.2 149
not only because of its general effect on cell Table 6.2 Some neurotoxins, their sources and actions
function but also as an epigenetic agent that Substance Origin Action
activates gene processes related to apoptosis.
Many glutamatelike chemicals, including Alcohol Fermentation Alters brain development
domoic acid, a causal agent in shellfish poi- Apamin Bees and wasps Blocks Ca21 channels
soning; kainic acid, a toxin in seaweed; and Botulinum toxin Clostridium botulinum bacteria Blocks ACh release
ibotenic acid, which is found in some poi- Caffeine Coffee bean Blocks adenosine receptors
and Ca21 channels
sonous mushrooms, kill neurons by a sim-
Colchicine Crocus plant Blocks microtubules
ilar action. Some psychoactive drugs, such
Curare Berry of Strychnos vine Blocks ACh receptors
as phencyclidine and ketamine (both once
Domoic acid Seaweed, shell fish Mimics glutamate
used as anesthetic agents) also act as gluta-
Ibotenic acid Amanita muscaria and Amanita Similar to domoic acid
mate agonists, leaving open the possibility pantherina mushrooms
that at high doses they, too, can cause neu- Magnesium Metallic element Blocks Ca21 channels
ronal death. Mercury Metallic element Blocks many brain enzymes
Determining whether recreational drug Rabies virus Animal bite Blocks ACh receptors
use causes brain damage is difficult. Chronic Reserpine Rauwulfia shrubs Destroys storage granules
alcohol use, for instance, can be associated Spider venom Black widow spider Stimulates ACh release
with damage to the thalamus and limbic sys- Strychnine Plants of genus Strychnos Blocks glycine
tem, producing severe memory disorders. Tetrodotoxin Pufferfish Blocks Na1 ions
Alcohol itself does not cause this damage;
rather, it stems from complications related
to alcohol abuse, including thiamine (vitamin B1) deficiencies due to poor diet.
Thiamine plays a vital role in maintaining cell-membrane structure.
Nevertheless, some drugs of abuse do produce harmful effects on the body
(Milroy and Parai, 2011). The strongest evidence that a recreational drug can
cause brain damage and cognitive impairments comes from
the study of the synthetic amphetaminelike drug MDMA (also
called hallucinogenic amphetamine, ecstasy, and in pure pow-
der form, Molly) (Büttner, 2011). It is often taken by people to
enhance party experiences, for example at a rave, an all-night
party featuring lights and music. Findings from animal stud-
ies show that doses of MDMA approximating those taken by
human users result in the degeneration of very fine serotonergic
nerve terminals. In monkeys, the terminal loss may be perma-
nent, as shown in Figure 6.9.
Memory impairments and damage revealed by brain imag-
ing have been reported in MDMA users and may be a result
of similar neuronal damage (Cowan et al., 2008). MDMA may
also contain a contaminant, paramethoxymethamphetamine
(PMMA). This toxic amphetamine is also called Dr. Death because the differ- Figure 6.9 m
ence between a dose that causes behavioral effects and a dose that causes death Drug Damage Treatment
is minuscule (Vevelstad et al., 2012). Contamination by unknown compounds with MDMA changes the density
of serotonin axons in the neo-
can occur in any drug purchased on the street.
cortex of a squirrel monkey: (left)
The psychoactive properties of cocaine are similar to those of amphetamine, normal monkey; (right) monkey 18
and it also has deleterious side effects. Cocaine use is related to the blockage months after MDMA treatment.
of cerebral blood flow and other changes in blood circulation. Brain-imaging (From U.D. McCann, K.A. Lowe, and
G.A. Ricaurte, From Long Lasting
studies also suggest that cocaine use can be toxic to neurons because a num-
Effects of Recreational Drugs of Abuse
ber of brain regions are reduced in size in cocaine users (Barrós-Loscertales et on the Central Nervous System, The
al., 2011). Neuroscientist 3:401, 1997.)
150 Part I Bac kg r ou n d
Some cases of chronic marijuana use have been associated with psychotic at-
tacks. The marijuana plant contains at least 400 chemicals, 60 or more of which
are structurally related to its active ingredient, tetrahydrocannabinol. Deter-
mining whether a psychotic attack is related to THC or to some other ingredi-
ent contained in marijuana or to aggravation of an existing condition is almost
impossible (DeLisi, 2008).
Group V Psychotropics
Behavioral stimulants: amphetamine, cocaine Sedation
Alcohol or
barbiturate
GABA Benzodiazepine
Barbiturate GABA Benzodiazepine
site
site
Figure 6.11 b
Chloride
channel Cl– Cl– Cl– Drug Effects at the
GABAA Receptor Sedative
hypnotics act at the barbiturate
Sedative-hypnotic drugs Antianxiety drugs Because of their
site (left), and antianxiety agents
(alcohol or barbiturates) (benzodiazepines) influence different actions, these
act at the benzodiazepine site
increase the binding of the frequency of pore drugs should not be
(center). Taken together (right)
GABA by maximizing the openings. taken together.
these two types of drugs can
time the pore is open.
be lethal.
152 Part I Bac kg r ou n d
Antidepressant Medications
Several types of drugs have antidepressant effects: monoamine oxidase (MAO)
inhibitors; tricyclic antidepressants, so called because of their three-ringed
chemical structure; second-generation antidepressants, sometimes called
atypical antidepressants (see Table 6.3); and the antianxiety agent ketamine.
Second-generation antidepressants lack a three-ringed structure, but they share
some similarities to the tricyclics in their actions.
Antidepressants are thought to act by improving chemical neurotransmis-
sion at serotonin, noradrenaline, histamine, and ACh synapses, and perhaps
at dopamine synapses as well. F igure 6.13 shows the actions of MAO inhibi-
tors and second-generation antidepressants at a serotonin synapse, the syn-
apse on which most research is focused. MAO inhibitors and the tricyclic and
154 Part I Bac kg r ou n d
Mood Stabilizers
Bipolar disorder, once referred to as manic–depressive illness, is characterized
by periods of depression alternating with normal periods and periods of intense
excitation, or mania. According to the National Institute of Mental Health, bi-
polar disorder can affect as much as 2.6 percent of the adult U.S. population.
The difficulty of treating bipolar disorder with drugs is related to the diffi-
culty of understanding how a disease produces symptoms that appear to be op-
posites: mania and depression. Consequently, bipolar disorder often is treated
with a number of drugs, each directed toward a different symptom. Mood
stabilizers, which include the salt lithium carbonate, mute the intensity of one
pole of the disorder, thus making the other less likely to occur. Lithium does
not directly affect mood and so may act by stimulating mechanisms of neuronal
repair, such as the production of neuron growth factors.
A variety of drugs effective in treating epilepsy (carbamazepine, valproate)
have positive effects, perhaps by muting neuronal excitability during the mania
Chapter 6 The Influence of Drugs and Hormones on Behavior §6.3 155
pole. And antipsychotic drugs that block D2 receptors effectively control the hal-
lucinations and delusions associated with mania. Because all these treatments
have side effects, enhancing beneficial effects while minimizing side effects is a
major focus of new drug development (Severus et al., 2012).
Because they can enter the brain quickly, they can quickly block the actions of
morphine. Many people addicted to opioids carry a competitive inhibitor as a
treatment for overdosing. Because they can also be long-acting, competitive
inhibitors are used to treat opioid addiction after the addicted person has re-
covered from withdrawal symptoms.
Researchers have extensively studied whether endorphins that exist in the brain
can be used as drugs to relieve pain without producing the addictive effects of
morphine. The answer is so far mixed, and the objectives of pain research in pro-
ducing an analgesic that does not produce addiction may be difficult to realize.
Opioid drugs, such as heroin, are addictive and are abused worldwide. The
hypodermic needle was developed in 1853 and used in the American Civil War
for the intravenous injection of morphine for pain treatment. This practice
reportedly produced 400,000 sufferers of the “soldiers disease” of morphine
addiction. Morphine can be administered by many routes, but intravenous in-
jection is preferred because it produces euphoria described as a rush. Morphine
does not readily cross the blood–brain barrier, whereas heroin does, and so the
latter is even more likely to produce a rush.
If opioids are used repeatedly, they produce tolerance such that, within a few
weeks, the effective dose may increase tenfold. Thereafter, many of the desired
effects with respect to both pain and addiction are no longer realized. An ad-
dicted person cannot simply stop using the drug, however. A severe sickness
called withdrawal results if drug use is stopped abruptly.
Because morphine results in both tolerance and sensitization, the morphine
user is always flirting with the possibility of an overdose. The unreliability of
appropriate information on the purity of street forms of morphine contributes
to the risk of overdosing. A lack of sterile needles for injections also leaves the
morphine user at risk for many other diseases, including AIDS (acquired im-
munodeficiency syndrome) and hepatitis.
Opioid ingestion produces a wide range of physiological changes in addition
to pain relief, including relaxation and sleep, euphoria, and constipation. Other
effects include respiratory depression, decreased blood pressure, pupil constric-
tion, hypothermia, drying of secretions (e.g., dry mouth), reduced sex drive,
and flushed, warm skin. Withdrawal is characterized by sicknesslike symptoms
that are the physiologically and behaviorally opposite of those produced by
the drug. Thus, a major part of the addiction syndrome is the drive to prevent
withdrawal symptoms.
Group V: Psychotropics
Psychotropic drugs are stimulants that mainly affect mental activity; motor ac-
tivity; and arousal, perception, and mood. Behavioral stimulants affect motor
activity and mood. Psychedelic and hallucinogenic stimulants affect perception
and produce hallucinations. General stimulants mainly affect mood.
Behavioral Stimulants
Behavioral stimulants increase motor behavior as well as elevating a person’s
mood and alertness. They are used to boost alertness but can be addictive.
Amphetamine is a synthetic compound that was discovered in attempts to
synthesize the CNS neurotransmitter epinephrine, which also acts as a hormone
to mobilize the body for fight or flight in times of stress. Both amphetamine and
Chapter 6 The Influence of Drugs and Hormones on Behavior §6.3 157
Figure 6.15 m
cocaine are dopamine agonists that act first by blocking the dopamine reuptake
transporter. Interfering with the reuptake mechanism leaves more dopamine Behavioral Stimulant
Cocaine (left) is obtained from the
available in the synaptic cleft. Amphetamine also stimulates the release of dopa
leaves of the coca plant (center).
mine from presynaptic membranes. Both mechanisms increase the amount of Crack cocaine (right) is chemically
dopamine available in synapses to stimulate dopamine receptors. Amphetamine- altered to form rocks that vaporize
based drugs are widely prescribed to treat attention deficit/hyperactivity dis when heated. (Left: Timothy Ross/
The Image Works. Center: Gregory G.
order (ADHD) and widely used illicitly as study aids, as reported in the Snapshot.
Dimijian/Science Source. Right: Tek
A form of amphetamine was first used as a treatment for asthma: Benzedrine Image/Science Source.)
was sold in inhalers as a nonprescription drug through the 1940s. Soon people
discovered that they could open the container and ingest its contents to obtain
an energizing effect. Amphetamine was widely used in World War II—and is
still used today to help troops and pilots stay alert, increase confidence and ag-
gression, and boost morale—and was used then to improve the productivity of Figure 6.16 .
wartime workers. Amphetamine is also used as a weight-loss aid. Many over-
the-counter compounds marketed as stimulants or weight-loss aids have am- Warning Label Cocaine was
once an ingredient in a number of
phetaminelike pharmacological actions. invigorating beverages, including
An amphetamine derivative, methamphetamine (also known as meth, speed, Coca-Cola, as this advertisement
crank, smoke, or crystal ice) continues in widespread use. Lifetime prevalence suggests. (The Granger Collection,
of methamphetamine use in the U.S. population, estimated to be as high NYC. All rights reserved.)
ton’s disease (Sarne et al., 2011). Many reports attest that some ingredients in
marijuana reduce epileptic attacks. An oil containing cannabidiol, a compound
with few psychoactive effects obtained from a marijuana strain named Char-
lotte’s Web after the first child who used it, is effective in treating childhood
epilepsy (Robson, 2014).
For decades, investigations into marijuana’s medicinal effects have been
made difficult by legal restrictions against THC use. Now that legal restric-
tions are being reduced in some jurisdictions, widespread use of medicinal THC
makes controlled studies difficult to conduct.
General Stimulants
General stimulants are drugs that cause an overall increase in cells’ meta-
bolic activity. Caffeine, a widely used stimulant, inhibits an enzyme that or-
dinarily breaks down the second messenger cyclic adenosine monophosphate
(cAMP). The resulting increase in cAMP leads to increased glucose produc-
tion within cells, making more energy available and allowing higher rates of
cellular activity.
A cup of coffee contains about 100 milligrams of caffeine, and many com-
mon soft drinks contain almost as much—some energy drinks pack as much as
500 milligrams. Excess levels can lead to the jitters. Regular caffeine users who
quit may experience headaches, irritability, and other withdrawal symptoms.
Behavior on Drugs
Ellen, a 19-year-old university freshman, knows the risks of unprotected sexual
intercourse. At a homecoming party in her residence hall, Ellen has a great time,
drinking and dancing with her friends and meeting new people. She is particu-
larly taken with Brad, a sophomore, and the two of them decide to go back to
her room to order a pizza. One thing leads to another, and Ellen and Brad have
sexual intercourse without using a condom. The next morning, Ellen is dis-
mayed and surprised by her failure practice safe sex (MacDonald et al., 2000).
What is it about drugs that make people do things they never would do
when sober? Risky behavior associated with alcohol use is costly both to indi-
viduals and to society. Beyond unprotected sexual activity, people risk drinking
and driving, date rape, spousal or child abuse, and other forms of aggression and
crime. An early and still widely held explanation of the effects of alcohol is the
disinhibition theory. It holds that alcohol has a selective depressant effect on
Chapter 6 The Influence of Drugs and Hormones on Behavior §6.4 161
the cortex, the brain region that controls judgment, while sparing subcortical
structures, those areas responsible for more-primitive instincts, such as desire.
Alcohol presumably depresses learned inhibitions based on reasoning and judg-
ment while releasing the “beast” within.
Disinhibition theory excuses alcohol-related behavior with such statements
as “She was too drunk to know better” or “The boys had a few too many and got
carried away.” Does disinhibition explain Ellen’s behavior? Not entirely. Ellen
had used alcohol in the past and managed to practice safe sex despite the effects
of the drug. If alcohol is a disinhibitor, why is it not always so?
Craig MacAndrew and Robert Edgerton (1969) questioned disinhibition the-
ory along just these lines in their book, Drunken Comportment. They cite many
instances in which behavior under the influence of alcohol changes from one
context to another. People who engage in polite social activity at home when
consuming alcohol may become unruly and aggressive when drinking in a bar.
They cite cultures in which people are disinhibited when sober only to become
inhibited after consuming alcohol and cultures in which people are inhibited
when sober and become more inhibited when drinking.
MacAndrew and Edgerton suggest that behavior under the effects of alco-
hol is both learned and specific to culture, group, and setting, and can in part
explain Ellen’s decision to sleep with Brad. Where alcohol is used to facilitate
social interactions, behavior while intoxicated represents a “learned time out”
from more-conservative dating rules. But appeals to learning theory have more
difficulty explaining Ellen’s lapse in judgment regarding safe sex. Ellen had
never indulged in unsafe sex before and had never made it a part of her time-
out social activities.
Another explanation for alcohol-related lapses in judgment like Ellen’s is
alcohol myopia (nearsightedness), the tendency for people under the influence
of alcohol to respond to a restricted set of immediate and prominent cues while
ignoring more-remote cues and potential consequences. Once Ellen and Brad
arrived at Ellen’s room, the sexual cues were more immediate than concerns
about long-term safety. Alcohol myopia can explain many lapses in judgment
that lead to risky behavior, including aggression, date rape, and reckless driving
while intoxicated. After drinking, individuals may have poor insight into their
level of intoxication: they may assume that they are less impaired than they ac-
tually are (Lac and Berger, 2013).
Substance abuse is a pattern of drug use in which people rely on a drug chron-
ically and excessively, allowing it to occupy a central place in their lives. A more
advanced state of abuse is substance dependence, popularly known as addiction.
Addicted people are physically dependent on a drug in addition to abusing it.
They have developed tolerance for the drug, and so an addict requires increased
doses to obtain the desired effect.
Drug addicts may also experience unpleasant, sometimes dangerous, physical
withdrawal symptoms if they suddenly stop taking the abused drug. Symp-
toms can include muscle aches and cramps, anxiety attacks, sweating, nausea,
and even, for some drugs, convulsions and death. Symptoms of withdrawal from
alcohol or morphine can begin within hours of the last dose and tend to inten-
sify over several days before they subside.
Opioid brain systems are associated with liking. The first step on the pro-
Initial Liking posed road to drug dependence is the initial experience, when the drug affects
use
a neural system associated with pleasure. At this stage, the user may experience
Use liking the substance—including liking to take it within a social context. With
Chapter 6 The Influence of Drugs and Hormones on Behavior §6.4 163
repeated use, liking the drug may decline from its initial level. At this Frontal
cortex
stage the user may begin to increase the dosage to increase liking.
The neural basis of wanting is proposed to be the dopamine system.
Many kinds of abused or addictive drugs—including sedative hypnotics,
antianxiety agents, opioids, and stimulants—have a common property:
they produce psychomotor activation by stimulating dopamine systems
in some part of their dosage range. This common effect has led to the Nucleus
accumbens of
hypothesis that all abused drugs increase dopamine activity, especially basal ganglia
dopamine in the mesolimbic pathways (Figure 6.19).
Hippocampus
With each use, the drug taker increasingly associates cues related to drug (part of limbic Ventral
use—be it a hypodermic needle, the room in which the drug is taken, or the system) tegmental
area of midbrain
people with whom the drug is taken—with the drug-taking experience (Everitt
and Heberlein, 2013). The user at this stage makes this association because the Figure 6.19 m
drug enhances dopamine-related, classically conditioned cues associated with
Mesolimbic Dopamine
drug taking. Later encounters with these wanting cues produce enhanced dopa-
Pathways and Drug
mine activity, and this is the neural basis of wanting or craving (Fraioli, 1999). Craving Dopamine cells in the
Ample evidence confirms that abused drugs and the context in which they ventral tegmentum project axons
are taken initially has a pleasurable effect and that habitual users will continue to the nucleus accumbens; to
using their drug of choice, even when taking it no longer produces any plea- the limbic system, including the
hippocampus; and to the frontal
sure. Heroin addicts sometimes report that they are miserable, their lives are cortex, suggesting that these
in ruins, and the drug is not even pleasurable anymore. But they still want it. areas may play a role in addiction.
What’s more, desire for the drug often is greatest just when the addicted per-
son is maximally high, not when he or she is undergoing withdrawal. Finally,
cues associated with drug taking—the social situation, sight of the drug, or
drug paraphernalia—strongly influence decisions to take, or continue taking,
a drug.
6.5 Hormones
In 1849, European scientist A. A. Berthold removed the testes of a rooster and
found that the rooster no longer crowed. Nor did it engage in sexual or aggres-
Normal rooster
sive behavior. Berthold then reimplanted one testis in the rooster’s body cavity.
The rooster began crowing and displaying normal sexual and aggressive behav-
ior again. The reimplanted testis did not establish any nerve connections, so
Berthold concluded that it must release a chemical into the rooster’s circulatory
system to influence its behavior.
That chemical, we now know, is testosterone, the sex hormone secreted
by the testes and responsible for the distinguishing characteristics of the male.
The effect that Berthold produced by reimplanting the testis can be mimicked
Capon (rooster with by administering testosterone to a castrated rooster, or capon. The hormone is
gonads removed) sufficient to make the capon behave like a rooster with testes.
Chapter 6 The Influence of Drugs and Hormones on Behavior §6.5 165
Testosterone’s influence on the rooster illustrates some of the ways that this
hormone produces male behavior. Testosterone also initiates changes in the size
and appearance of the mature male body. In a rooster, for example, testoster-
one produces the animal’s distinctive plumage and crest, and it activates other
sex-related organs.
1
Hierarchical Control of Hormones In response to sensory stimuli and cognitive activity,
Figure 6.20 shows that hormones operate within a hi- the hypothalamus produces neurohormones that enter
erarchy that begins when the brain responds to sensory the anterior pituitary through veins and the posterior
pituitary through axons.
experiences and cognitive activity. The hypothala-
mus produces neurohormones that stimulate the pi-
tuitary gland to secrete releasing hormones into the Hypothalamus
circulatory system. The pituitary hormones, in turn, Sensory
influence the remaining endocrine glands to release stimuli
appropriate hormones into the bloodstream. These
hormones then act on various targets in the body and
send feedback to the brain about the need for more or
less hormone release.
Hormones not only affect body organs but also target
Pituitary gland
the brain and neurotransmitter-activating systems there.
Almost every neuron in the brain contains receptors on 3
which various hormones can act. In addition to influ- Target organs Endocrine glands release
encing sex organs and physical appearance in a rooster, and tissues their own hormones that
stimulate target organs,
testosterone may have neurotransmitterlike effects on Endocrine
including the brain.
the brain cells it targets, especially neurons that control hormones
crossing the cell membrane. They enter target cells in the same way and act on
the cells’ DNA to increase or decrease protein production.
Peptide hormones, such as insulin, growth hormone, and the endorphins,
are made by cellular DNA in the same way as other proteins are made. They
influence their target cell’s activity by binding to metabotropic receptors on the
cell membrane, generating a second messenger that affects the cell’s physiology.
Steroid and peptide hormones fall into one of three main functional groups
with respect to behavior, and they may function in more than one group:
1. Homeostatic hormones maintain a state of internal metabolic balance
and regulate physiological systems in an organism. Mineralocorticoids
(e.g., aldosterone) control both the concentration of water in blood and
cells and the levels of sodium, potassium, and calcium in the body, and they
promote digestive functions.
2. Gonadal (sex) hormones control reproductive functions. They instruct
the body to develop as male (testosterone) or female (estrogen); influence
sexual behavior and the conception of children; and, in women, control the
menstrual cycle (estrogen and progesterone), the birthing of babies, and
the release of breast milk (prolactin, oxytocin).
3. Glucocorticoids (e.g., cortisol and corticosterone), a group of steroid
hormones secreted in times of stress, are important in protein and car-
bohydrate metabolism and in controlling sugar levels in the blood and
the absorption of sugar by cells. Hormones activated in psychologically
challenging events or emergency situations prepare the body to cope by
fighting or fleeing.
Homeostatic Hormones
The homeostatic hormones regulate the body’s internal environment within
relatively constant parameters. An appropriate balance of sugars, proteins, car-
bohydrates, salts, and water is required in the bloodstream, in the extracellular
compartments of muscles, in the brain and other body structures, and in all
body cells.
A typical homeostatic function is controlling blood-sugar levels. One group
of cells in the pancreas releases insulin, a homeostatic hormone that causes
blood sugar to fall by instructing the liver to start storing glucose rather than
releasing it and by instructing cells to increase glucose uptake. The resulting
decrease in glucose then decreases the stimulation of pancreatic cells so that
they stop producing insulin.
Diabetes mellitus is caused by a failure of these pancreatic cells to secrete
enough insulin, or any at all. As a result, blood-sugar levels can fall (hypo-
glycemia) or rise (hyperglycemia). In hyperglycemia, blood-glucose levels rise
because insulin does not instruct cells of the body to take up that glucose. Con-
sequently, cell function, including neural function, can fail through glucose
starvation, even in the presence of high glucose levels in the blood. Chronic
high blood-glucose levels damage the eyes, kidneys, nerves, heart, and blood
vessels. Eric Steen and his coworkers (2005) propose that insulin resistance in
brain cells may be related to Alzheimer’s disease. They raise the possibility that
Alzheimer’s disease may be a third type of diabetes.
Chapter 6 The Influence of Drugs and Hormones on Behavior §6.5 167
Gonadal Hormones
The gonadal hormones give us our sexual appearance, mold our identity as male
or female, and allow us to engage in sex-related behaviors. Sex hormones begin to
act on us even before we are born and continue their actions throughout our lives.
The male Y chromosome contains a gene called the sex-determining region,
or SRY, gene. If cells in the undifferentiated gonads of the early embryo contain
an SRY gene, they will develop into a testis, and if they do not, they will de-
velop into an ovary. In the male, the testes produce the hormone testosterone,
which in turn masculinizes the body, producing the male body, genital organs,
and the male brain.
The organizational hypothesis proposes that hormone actions in the course
of development alter tissue differentiation. Thus, testosterone masculinizes the
brain early in life by being taken up in brain cells, where it is converted into
estrogen by the enzyme aromatase. Estrogen then acts on estrogen receptors
to initiate a chain of events that includes activating certain genes in the cell
nucleus. These genes then contribute to the masculinization of brain cells and
their interactions with other brain cells.
That estrogen, a hormone usually associated with the female, masculin-
izes the male brain may seem surprising. Estrogen does not have the same ef-
fect on the female brain, because females have a blood enzyme that binds to
estrogen and prevents its entry into the brain. Hormones play a somewhat lesser
role in producing the female body as well as the female brain, but they control
the mental and physical aspects of menstrual cycles, regulate many facets of
pregnancy and birth, and stimulate milk production for breast-feeding babies.
Hormones contribute to surprising differences in the brain and in cognitive
behavior including, as noted in Section 6.4, playing a role in male–female differ-
ences in drug dependence and addiction. The male brain is slightly larger than
the female brain after corrections are made for body size, and the right hemi-
sphere is somewhat larger than the left in males. The female brain has a higher
rate both of cerebral blood flow and of glucose utilization. Other differences
include brain size in different brain regions, including nuclei in the hypothala-
mus related to sexual function and parts of the corpus callosum that are larger
in females, a somewhat larger language region in the female brain, and other
cortical gray-matter changes (Koolschijn et al., 2014).
Three lines of evidence, summarized by Elizabeth Hampson and Doreen
Kimura (2005), support the conclusion that sex-related cognitive differences re-
sult from these brain differences. First, results of spatial and verbal tests given to
females and males in many different settings and cultures show that males tend
to excel in the spatial tasks tested and females in the verbal tasks. Second, simi-
lar tests given to female participants in the course of the menstrual cycle show
fluctuations in test scores with various phases of the cycle. During the phase in
which the female sex hormones estradiol (metabolized from estrogen) and pro-
gesterone are at their lowest levels, women do comparatively better on spatial
tasks. During the phase in which levels of these hormones are high, women do
comparatively better on verbal tasks. Third, tests comparing premenopausal and
postmenopausal women, women in various stages of pregnancy, and females and
males with varying levels of circulating hormones all provide some evidence that
gonadal hormones affect cognitive function.
168 Part I Bac kg r ou n d
Anabolic–Androgenic Steroids
A class of synthetic hormones related to testosterone has both muscle-building
(anabolic) and masculinizing (androgenic) effects. These anabolic–androgenic ste-
roids, commonly known simply as anabolic steroids (and more commonly as
roids), were synthesized originally to build body mass and enhance endurance.
Russian weightlifters were the first to use them, in 1952, to enhance perfor-
mance and win international competitions.
Synthetic steroid use rapidly spread to other countries and sports, eventually
leading to a ban from use in track and field athletes and then from many other
sports competitors as well. Testing policy has led to a cat-and-mouse game in
which new anabolic steroids and new ways of taking them and masking them
are devised to evade detection.
Today, anabolic steroid use is about equal among athletes and nonathletes.
More than 1 million people in the United States have used anabolic steroids
not only to enhance athletic performance but also to enhance physique and ap-
pearance. Anabolic steroid use in high schools may be as high as 7 percent for
males and 3 percent for females.
The use of anabolic steroids carries health risks. Their administration re-
sults in the body reducing its manufacture of the male hormone testosterone,
which in turn reduces male fertility and spermatogenesis. Muscle bulk is in-
creased, and so is male aggression. Cardiovascular effects include increased
risk of heart attacks and stroke. Liver and kidney function may be compro-
mised, and the risk of tumors may increase. Male-pattern baldness may be en-
hanced, and females may experience clitoral enlargement, acne, increased body
hair, and a deepened voice.
Anabolic steroids also have approved clinical uses. Testosterone replacement
is a treatment for hypogonadal males. It is also useful for treating muscle loss
subsequent to trauma and for recovering muscle mass in malnourished people.
In females, anabolic steroids are used to treat endometriosis and fibrocystic
breast disease.
2 2
The sympathetic ACTH ...which releases
division of the ANS is ACTH onto the
activated to stimulate Pituitary cortex of the
Spinal gland
the medulla of the adrenal gland,...
cord
adrenal gland,...
To brain To brain 3
3 Adrenal Adrenal
To body To body cortex ...which releases
...which releases medulla
cells cells cortisol into the
epinephrine into the To endocrine To endocrine Co
rt circulatory system.
nephri s ol
circulatory system. Epi
i
n glands glands
e
Adrenal
glands 4
4
Epinephrine activates Cortisol activates
body cells, endocrine Kidneys body cells, endocrine
glands, and brain. glands, and brain.
Figure 6.21 m
organs for “fight or flight,” and the parasympathetic division for “rest and di- Activating a Stress
gest” is turned off. In addition, the sympathetic division stimulates the medulla Response Two pathways to
the adrenal gland control the
on the interior of the adrenal gland to release epinephrine. The epinephrine
body’s stress response. The fast-
surge (often called the adrenaline surge after epinephrine’s original name) pre- acting pathway primes the body
pares the body for a sudden burst of activity. Among its many functions, epi- immediately to fight or flee. The
nephrine stimulates cell metabolism to ready the body’s cells for action. slow-acting pathway both mobi-
lizes body resources to confront
The hormone controlling the slow response is the steroid cortisol, a
a stressor and repairs stress-
glucocorticoid released from the outer layer (cortex) of the adrenal gland, related damage. Abbreviations:
as shown on the right side of Figure 6.21. The cortisol pathway is activated CRF, corticotropin-releasing
slowly, taking minutes to hours. Cortisol has a wide range of functions, in- factor; ACTH, adrenocorticotropic
hormone.
cluding turning off all bodily systems not immediately required to deal with a
stressor. For example, cortisol turns off insulin so that the liver starts releasing
glucose, temporarily increasing the body’s energy supply. It also shuts down
reproductive functions and inhibits the production of growth hormone. In this
way, the body’s energy supplies can be concentrated on dealing with the stress.
ing off the stress response. The hippocampus contains a high density of cortisol
More Fewer receptors, and its axons project to the hypothalamus. Cortisol levels are regu-
cortisol Prolonged hippocampal
secretion stress neurons lated by the hippocampus, but if levels remain elevated because a stress-inducing
situation continues, cortisol eventually damages it. The damaged hippocampus
is then unable to reduce the cortisol level. Thus, a vicious circle is set up in
De o
n hu t
ff c sed ability t io
ortis t are uncontrolled (Figure 6.22). This idea underlies one explanation for post-
ol secre
traumatic stress disorder: it is a stress response that is not turned off. People
with PTSD experience recurring memories and dreams related to a traumatic
Figure 6.22 m
event for months or years, and the accompanying physiological arousal en-
Vicious Circle hances their belief that danger is imminent (see Chapter 26 opening Portrait).
Research has yet to offer a clear-cut answer as to whether the cumulative
effects of stress damage the human hippocampus. For example, research on
women who were sexually abused in childhood and subsequently diagnosed
with PTSD yields some reports of changes in hippocampal volume as mea-
sured with brain-imaging techniques. Other studies report no differences in
abused and nonabused women (Landré et al., 2010). Possible explanations for
such differing results include the limitations of imaging techniques and indi-
vidual differences in stress responses.
Humans are long-lived and gather myriad life experiences that compli-
cate simple extrapolations from a single stressful event. Nevertheless, Patrick
McGowan and his coworkers (2009) report decreased glucocorticoid-receptor
density in the hippocampi of suicide victims who had been sexually abused in
childhood compared with that of suicide victims who had not been abused and
with that of controls. The decrease in receptors and in glucocorticoid mRNA
suggests that childhood abuse induces epigenetic changes in the expression of
glucocorticoid genes. The decrease in glucocorticoid receptors presumably ren-
ders the hippocampus less able to depress stress responses. The importance of
the McGowan study is its suggestion of a mechanism through which stress can
influence hippocampal function without necessarily being associated with a de-
crease in hippocampal volume.
SUMMARY
6.1 Principles of Psychopharmacology 6.2 Drug Actions in Synapses
Psychoactive drugs target the central nervous system. The Synapses play a central role in determining how drugs pro-
dose required and the route to the brain are successively duce their effects on behavior. Drugs can influence any bio-
smaller if the drug is administered orally, to the lungs, into chemical event pertaining to neurotransmission—synthesis
the bloodstream, or directly into the brain. Major barriers to of a transmitter; its release from the axon terminal; its in-
drug action include the stomach lining, dilution by the blood teraction at the postsynaptic receptor; and its inactivation,
volume, absorption by other body cells, dilution in extracel- reuptake, or degradation. Any modification of synaptic com-
lular fluid, and the blood–brain barrier. The many routes munication results in increased or decreased transmitter ac-
of drug elimination include general metabolism; respiration; tion. In this way, drugs can act as agonists to increase synaptic
and elimination in feces, urine, and sweat. transmission or as antagonists to decrease it.
Chapter 6 The Influence of Drugs and Hormones on Behavior 171
Drugs are extremely variable in producing their effects, experiences associated with prominent cues and drug seek-
both with respect to different persons and with respect to the ing promote craving for the drug. As addiction proceeds, the
same person on different occasions. A decreased response to subjective experience of liking decreases, owing to tolerance,
a drug with use is called tolerance, whereas an increased re- while wanting increases, owing to sensitization.
sponse is called sensitization. Drug treatment varies by the drug abused. Whatever the
treatment approach, success depends on permanent lifestyle
6.3 Grouping Psychoactive Drugs changes. Considering how many people use tobacco, drink
The extraordinary number of psychoactive drugs can be clas- alcohol, use recreational drugs, or abuse prescription drugs,
sified according to the behavioral effects they produce. Drugs finding someone who has not used a drug when it was avail-
can act as sedative hypnotics and antianxiety agents, as anti- able is probably a rarity. But some people do seem vulnerable
psychotic agents, as antidepressants and mood stabilizers, as to drug use and addiction because of genetic or epigenetic
opioid analgesics, and as psychotropics. Each group, sum- influences.
marized in Table 6.3 on page 150, contains natural or syn-
thetic drugs or both, and they may produce their actions in 6.5 Hormones
different ways. Steroid and peptide hormones produced by endocrine glands
circulate in the bloodstream to affect a wide variety of tar-
6.4 Individual Responses and Influences gets. Interacting to regulate hormone levels, a hierarchy of
on Addiction sensory stimuli and cognitive activity in the brain stimulates
A drug does not have a uniform action on every person. Phys- the pituitary gland through the hypothalamus. The pituitary
ical differences—in body weight, sex, age, or genetic back- stimulates or inhibits the endocrine glands, which, through
ground—influence the effects a given drug has on a given other hormones, send feedback to the brain.
person, as do such behaviors as learning and cultural and en- Homeostatic hormones regulate the balance of sugars,
vironmental contexts. proteins, carbohydrates, salts, and other substances in the
The influence of drugs on behavior varies widely with the body. Gonadal hormones regulate the physical features and
situation and as a person learns drug-related behaviors. Al- behaviors associated with sex characteristics and behaviors,
cohol myopia, for example, can influence a person to focus reproduction, and caring for offspring. Glucocorticoids are
primarily on prominent cues in the environment. These cues steroid hormones that regulate the body’s ability to cope with
may encourage the person to behave in ways that he or she stress—with arousing and challenging situations. Synthetic
would not normally display. anabolic steroids that mimic the effects of testosterone and
Females are more sensitive to drugs than males are and so increase muscle bulk, stamina, and aggression can have
may become addicted more quickly to lower doses of drugs deleterious side effects.
than males. The incidence of female abuse of many kinds of Failure to turn stress responses off after a stressor has
drugs currently equals or exceeds male abuse of those drugs. passed can contribute to susceptibility to PTSD and other
Initially, drug taking produces pleasure (liking), but psychological and physical diseases. Prolonged stress may
with repeated use, the behavior becomes conditioned to activate epigenetic changes that modify the expression of
associated objects, events, and places. Eventually, those genes regulating hormonal responses to stress, producing
conditioned cues motivate the drug user to seek them out brain changes that persist long after the stress-provoking in-
(wanting), which leads to more drug taking. These subjective cident has passed.
References
Ballard, P. A., J. W. Tetrud, and J. W. Langston. Permanent Browne, C. A., and I. Lucki. Antidepressant effects of
human Parkinsonism due to 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1, 2, 3, ketamine: Mechanisms underlying fast-acting novel
6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP). Neurology 35:949–956, 1985. antidepressants. Frontiers in Pharmacology 4:161–172,
Barrós-Loscertales, A., H. Garavan, J. C. Bustamante, December 27, 2013.
N. Ventura-Campos, J. J. Llopis, et al. Reduced striatal Büttner, A. Review: The neuropathology of drug abuse.
volume in cocaine-dependent patients. NeuroImage 56, Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology 37:118–134,
1021–1026, 2011. 2011.
Becker, J. B., S. M. Breedlove, D. Crews, and M. M. Comer, R. J. Fundamentals of Abnormal Psychology (7th ed.).
McCarthy. Behavioral Endocrinology (2nd ed.). Cambridge, New York: Worth Publishers, 2011.
MA: Bradford, 2002. Cowan, R. L., D. M. Roberts, and J. M. Joers. Neuroimaging
Becker, J. B., and M. Hu. Sex differences in drug abuse. Fron- in human MDMA (Ecstasy) users. Annals of the New York
tiers in Neuroendocrinology 29:(1), 36–47, 2008. Academy of Sciences 1139:291–298, 2008.
172 Part I Bac kg r ou n d
DeCarolis, N. A., and A. J. Eisch. Hippocampal neurogen- Mateus-Pinheiro, A., L. Pinto, J. M. Bessa, M. Morais,
esis as a target for the treatment of mental illness: A critical N. D. Alves, S. Monteiro, P. Patrício, O. F. Almeida,
evaluation. Neuropharmacology 58:884–893, 2010. and N. Sousa. Sustained remission from depressive-like
DeLisi, L. E. The effect of Cannabis on the brain: Can it cause behavior depends on hippocampal neurogenesis. Transla-
brain anomalies that lead to increased risk for schizo- tional Psychiatry 15:3:e210, 2013.
phrenia? Current Opinion in Psychiatry 21(2):140–150, 2008. McCann, U. D., K. A. Lowe, and G. A. Ricaurte. Long-lasting
Durell, T. M., L. A. Kroutil, P. Crits-Christoph, N. Barchha, effects of recreational drugs of abuse on the central nervous
and D. E. Van Brunt. Prevalence of nonmedical meth- system. Neurologist 3:399–411, 1997.
amphetamine use in the United States. Substance Abuse McGowan, P. O., A. Sasaki, A. C. D’Alessio, S. Dymov,
Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 3:19, 2008. B. Labonté, M. Szyf, G. Turecki, and M. J. Meaney. Epi-
genetic regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor in human
Eto, K. Minamata disease: A neuropathological viewpoint.
brain associates with childhood abuse. Nature Neurosciences
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi 108:10–23, 2006.
12:342–348, 2009.
Everitt, B. J., and U. Heberlein. Addiction. Current Opinion in
Merritt, K., P. McGuire, and A. Egerton. Relationship between
Neurobiology 23:463, 2013.
glutamate dysfunction and symptoms and cognitive function
Fraioli, S., H. S. Crombag, A. Badiani, and T. E. Rob- in psychosis. Frontiers in Psychiatry 4:151–156, 2013.
inson. Susceptibility to amphetamine-induced locomotor
Milroy, C. M., and J. L. Parai. The histopathology of drugs of
sensitization is modulated by environmental stimuli. Neuro-
abuse. Histopathology 59:579–593, 2011.
psychopharmacology 20:533–541, 1999.
Radjenović, J., M. Petrović, and D. Barceló. Fate and distribu-
Freud, S. Cocaine Papers (R. Byck, Ed.). New York: Penguin, tion of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge
1974. of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced
Hampson, E., and D. Kimura. Sex differences and hor- membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment. Water Research
monal influences on cognitive function in humans. In J. B. 43:831–841, 2009.
Becker, S. M. Breedlove, and D. Crews (Eds.), Behav- Robinson, T. E., and J. B. Becker. Enduring changes
ioral Endocrinology (pp. 357–398). Cambridge, MA: MIT in brain and behavior produced by chronic amphet-
Press, 2005. amine administration: A review and evaluation of animal
Hoang, M. T., L. F. Defina, B. L. Willis, D. S. Leonard, M. F. models of amphetamine psychosis. Brain Research Reviews
Weiner, and E. S. Brown. Association between low serum 11:157–198, 1986.
25-hydroxyvitamin D and depression in a large sample of Robinson, T. E., and K. C. Berridge. The neural basis of drug
healthy adults: Cooper Center Longitudinal Study. Mayo craving: An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction.
Clinic Proceedings 86:1050–1055, 2011. Brain Research Reviews 18:247–291, 1993.
Isbell, H., H. F. Fraser, R. E. Wikler, R. E. Belleville, and A. J. Robinson, T. E., and B. Kolb. Persistent structural adapta-
Eisenman. An experimental study of the etiology of “rum tions in nucleus accumbens and prefrontal cortex neurons
fits” and delirium tremens. Quarterly Journal for Studies of produced by prior experience with amphetamine. Journal of
Alcohol 16:1–35, 1955. Neuroscience 17:8491–8498, 1997.
Julien, R. M., C. D. Advokat, and J. E. Comaty. A Primer of Robison, A. J., and E. J. Nestler. Transcriptional and epigen-
Drug Action (12th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers, 2011. etic mechanisms of addiction. Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Koolschijn, P. C., J. S. Peper, and E. A. Crone. The influence 12:623–637, 2011.
of sex steroids on structural brain maturation in adoles- Robson, P. J. Therapeutic potential of cannabinoid medicines.
cence. PLoS ONE 9:January 8, 2014. Drug Testing and Analysis 6:24–30, 2014.
Langston, W. J. The Case of the Frozen Addicts. New York: Pan- Sapolsky, R. M. Why Zebras Don’t Get Ulcers. 3d ed. New York:
theon, 2008. Henry Holt and Company, 2004.
Lac, A., and D. E. Berger. Development and validation of the Sapolsky, R. M. Stress and plasticity in the limbic system. Neu-
alcohol myopia scale. Psychological Assessment 25:738–747, rochemical Research 28:1735–1742, 2005.
2013.
Sarne, Y., F. Asaf, M. Fishbein, M. Gafni, and O. Keren. The
Landré, L., C. Destrieux, M. Baudry, L. Barantin, J. P. Cottier, dual neuroprotective-neurotoxic profile of cannabinoid
et al. Preserved subcortical volumes and cortical thick- drugs. British Journal of Pharmacology 163:1391–1401, 2011.
ness in women with sexual abuse-related PTSD. Psychiatry
Severus, E., N. Schaaff , and H. J. Möller, State of the art:
Research 183:181–186, 2010.
Treatment of bipolar disorders. CNS Neuroscience Therapies
MacAndrew, C., and R. B. Edgerton. Drunken Comportment: A 18:214–218, 2012.
Social Explanation. Chicago: Aldine, 1969. Smith, A. D., S. M. Smith, C. A. de Jager, P. Whitbread,
MacDonald, T. K., G. MacDonald, M. P. Zanna, and G. T. C. Johnston, et al. Homocysteine-lowering by B vitamins
Fong. Alcohol, sexual arousal, and intentions to use con- slows the rate of accelerated brain atrophy in mild cogni-
doms in young men: Applying alcohol myopia theory to tive impairment: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE
risky sexual behavior. Health Psychology 19:290–298, 2000. 8:e12244, 2010.
Chapter 6 The Influence of Drugs and Hormones on Behavior 173