Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 24

Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023) 30:1428–1450

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22079-9

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Use of cellular automata‑based artificial neural networks for detection


and prediction of land use changes in North‑Western Dhaka City
Foyezur Rahman1 · Md.Tauhid Ur Rahman1

Received: 20 October 2021 / Accepted: 13 July 2022 / Published online: 2 August 2022
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022

Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze the trend of change in land use land cover (LULC) and land surface temperature (LST)
in Mirpur and its surrounding area over the last 30 years using Landsat satellite images and remote sensing indices, and to
develop relationships between LULC types and LST, as well as to analyze their impact on local warming. Using this analyzed
data, a further projection of LULC and LST change over the next two decades was made. From 1989 to 2019, 5-year intervals
of Landsat 4–5 TM and Landsat 8 OLI images were utilized to track the relationship between LULC changes and LST. The
modeled LST was validated with MODIS-derived LST within the study area. Cellular automata-based artificial neural network
(CA-ANN) algorithm was used to model the LULC and LST maps for the year 2039. The Normalized Difference Vegetation
Index (NDVI) and the Normalized Difference Built-up Index (NDBI) were analyzed to determine their link with LST. The rela-
tion between LST and LULC types indicates that built-up area raises LST by substituting non-evaporating surfaces for natural
vegetation. The average surface temperature was increasing steadily for the last 30 years. For the year 2019, it was determined
that roughly 86% of total land area has been converted to built-up area and that 89% of land area had an LST greater than 28 °C.
According to the study, if the current trend continues, 72% of the Mirpur area is predicted to see temperatures near 32 °C in
2039. Additionally, LST had a significant positive association with NDBI and a negative correlation with NDVI. The overall
accuracy of LULC was greater than 90%, with a kappa coefficient of 0.83. The study may assist urban planners and environmen-
tal engineers in comprehending and recommending effective policy measures and plans to mitigate the consequences of LULC.

Keywords Urbanization · LST · UHI · NDVI · NDBI · CA-ANN

Introduction the urban expansion. To facilitate such developments, a sig-


nificant portion of water bodies and agricultural lands have
In recent years, the mechanisms of the land use land cover transformed into built-up areas. This transformation of lands
(LULC) change, particularly in urban areas, have drawn affects the local, regional ecosystems, and deteriorates the
special attention from researchers. LULC’s global spatial quality of living environment (Dewan et al. 2012; Dewan
dynamics reveal the connection between land use change and Yamaguchi 2009a, b; IPCC 2014). Hence, the mecha-
and human activities (Corner et al. 2014; Dewan and Yama- nism of LULC transformation is complex since it depends
guchi 2009a, b; Meyer and Turner 1992; Rahman et al. on numerous natural and socio-economic factors (Chen et al.
2017a; Rahman et al. 2018; Rahman and Esha 2022). In 2006; McKinney 2002; Tran et al. 2017). Due to the scale
a developing country like Bangladesh, rapid population effect and vulnerability of the land system dynamics, these
growth and economic development contributed much to factors have a significant impact on the change in LULC.
Therefore, understanding the interrelationship among the
driving factors of LULC change is essentially required.
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues Moreover, prediction for future land use is also required
to plan and manage sustainable future cities (Balogun and
* Md.Tauhid Ur Rahman
tauhid_cee@yahoo.com Ishola 2017; Rahman et al. 2017a, b; Rahman et al. 2018;
Rahman and Esha 2022).
1
Department of Civil Engineering, Military Institute Dhaka, the capital of Bangladesh, is one of the world’s
of Science and Technology (MIST), Dhaka 1216, fastest expanding megacities (Rahman et al. 2017a; Dewan
Bangladesh

13

Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.


Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023) 30:1428–1450 1429

and Yamaguchi 2009a, b; Meyer and Turner 1992). It is changing patterns (Imran et al. 2021a, b; Kafy et al. 2021;
also one of the most densely populated cities where around Mortoja and Yigitcanlar 2020; Rahman et al. 2020; Rahman
34,000 people reside per square kilometer (Population and and Esha 2022). To monitor previous and existing LULC
Housing Census 2011 2011). The population of this city and determine the potential impacts of LULC on the city
has expanded by nearly 11 million during the last two dec- area, this study mainly focuses on predicting future changes
ades (Dewan and Yamaguchi 2009a, b). This rapid growth of LULC and identifies its impacts on future LST. Using a
is primarily driven by rural–urban migration. Vertical and CA-ANN model, the simulation of future land cover can be
horizontal expansion, and the transformation of wetlands analyzed. The CA-ANN model, together with the geographi-
and greeneries into built-up areas are considered the major cal information system, is widely regarded as the most pow-
contributor to the increase in land surface temperature (LST) erful tool for modeling the probabilities of the spatiotempo-
(Al-sharif and Pradhan 2014). However, very few research- ral shift in LULC (Arsanjani et al. 2013; Santé et al. 2010).
ers have explored the mechanism through which this urban Examining LULC change has become a matter of concern
expansion influences the changes in land cover and urban because of the decline in biodiversity, changes in habitats,
microclimate. There is a scope of scientific study in this field and changes in the regional and global climate patterns and
to measure the impacts of this massive urban population on composition (Li and Zhao 2003; Mishra and Rai 2016). It
land cover changes, biodiversity, and increase in average can be challenging, complicated, and likely to yield contra-
surface temperature. The study also aims at showing how dictory results to detect and test changes in LULC through
the built-up area, reduction of surface water bodies and veg- direct field visits (Meyer and Turner 1992; Rahman 2016;
etation land, and negative consequence of unplanned rapid Zheng et al. 2015). The use of the remote sensing and geo-
urbanization contribute to the increase in LST. graphic information system (GIS) technologies has over-
The same is the phenomenon at the macro level, as the come most of the constraints, enabling scientists to assess
increasing pace of exodus from villages to cities contributes and monitor changes in LST and LULC trends easily (Cor-
to “rapid changes to the ecosystems, biodiversity, natural ner et al. 2014; Fu and Weng 2018; Hart and Sailor 2009;
landscapes, and the environment of the cities” (McKinney Islam and Ahmed 2011). According to the research findings
2002). Surprisingly, more than 70% of the world’s popula- of many scientists, there are changes in various LULC com-
tion is anticipated to live in urban areas in the next 30 years ponents (water bodies, vegetation, and agricultural lands)
(Celik et al. 2019; Grimmond 2007; Handayanto et al. 2017; that contributes to the increase in LST which significantly
Kafy et al. 2019; Rahman et al. 2017a; Ullah et al. 2019). stimulates the generation of the UHI effect (Bahi et al. 2016;
While this development is a sign of economic growth and Lambin 1999; Maduako et al. 2016). LST is recognized as
economic stability in the region, it has several short- and one of the main factors for warming the urban microclimate.
long-term consequences. So, the importance of measuring Several local issues are closely linked to the LST, such as
the impacts on land cover changes and the urban microcli- biophysical hazards (e.g., heat stress), air pollution, and
mate becomes significantly important. public health concerns (Amiri et al. 2009; Chander et al.
In fact, over the last decade, geographers, urban plan- 2009; Streutker 2003). As the rise in surface temperature
ners, and climate scientists have been paying considerable contributes significantly to the deterioration of the ecologi-
attention to elevated LST in urban areas (Al-sharif and cal balance, it is, therefore, important to obtain LST as a
Pradhan 2014; Kafy et al. 2019; Maduako et al. 2016; Rah- first and primary step. And then create models to predict
man 2016; Zheng et al. 2015). Several studies suggest that LST so that findings can be implemented to mitigate the
population expansion appears to increase the average LST negative environmental impacts (Celik et al. 2019; Rahman
in urban environments by 2–4 °C in contrast with rural areas et al. 2017a; Rahman and Rashed 2015; Shatnawi and Abu
(Maimaitiyiming et al. 2014; Mozumder and Tripathi 2014; Qdais 2019; Weng et al. 2004).
Thapa and Murayama 2009; Yu et al. 2014). Increased LSTs Numerous studies have documented the changes in LULC
and urban heat island (UHI) impacts are associated with and LST in Dhaka City, revealing that the city has been
high energy consumption, air pollution, and health issues, losing a substantial quantity of wetland in its north-western
including the deaths of children and elders from asthma and region (Mirpur and its surrounding area). These lands are
heat stroke (Ahmed et al. 2013; Maduako et al. 2016; Rah- being transformed into urban areas, and as a result, severe
man et al. 2017a; Rahman and Rashed 2015; Scarano and repercussions on the microclimate of this area have been
Sobrino 2015; Zhi-hao et al. 2011; Zhou et al. 2011). posed (Dewan et al. 2021a, b; Imran et al. 2021a, b; Kafy
As LST is largely dependent on LULC therefore, pre- et al. 2021; Mortoja and Yigitcanlar 2020; Rahman et al.
diction of LULC for evaluating future change in LST is 2020; Rahman and Szabó 2021; Trotter et al. 2017). The
required. Cellular automata-artificial neural network (CA- study can be a significant baseline to find out the area-
ANN) model provides a solid understanding of the com- specific microclimate change. For guiding the sustainable
plexities of the spatial system to evaluate and predict LULC development of the area, it is necessary to safeguard the

13

Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.


1430 Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023) 30:1428–1450

unplanned urbanization of Dhaka’s north-western sector. temperature data (following the same date when the image
Under these circumstances, the research, using ANN-based was taken) collected from Bangladesh Metrological Depart-
CA algorithm simulation and using the recent and histori- ment (BMD) and Nasa Power Access Data. Afterwards, a
cally archived Landsat satellite images of Mirpur and its sur- correlation analysis was carried out among LST, NDVI, and
rounding areas, primarily investigates LULC and LST shifts NDBI. The whole methodological steps are given in the flow
in the past two decades (1989–2019) to predict the future diagram (Fig. 2).
growth and surface temperature of the study areas in 2039.
Land use land cover classification

Materials and methods To choose training samples and identify the various LULC
classes, a true color composite (TCC) was created using
Study area appropriate band combinations for all images (d’Entremont
and Thomason 1987; Good and Giordano 2019). Landsat
Numerous studies show that Mirpur and its surround- images were categorized using the Maximum Likelihood
ing area face tremendous LULC change and so LST over Supervised Classification (MLSC) approach for the years
the last 30 years (Imran et al. 2021a, b; Kafy et al. 2021; 1989, 1994, 1999, 2004, 2014, and 2019. Mirpur is a ver-
Mortoja and Yigitcanlar 2020; Rahman et al. 2020; Rah- satile urban area; hence, to avoid complexity, the area has
man and Szabó 2021). Therefore, to populate necessary been classified into four major LULC classes (water body,
relevant data for the analysis, Mirpur and its surrounding built-up area, vegetation, and bare land). A total of around
area (north-western part of Dhaka) have been selected as the 25 samples were gathered to generate LULC maps for each
main study area. The geographic location of the study area LULC class. Each categorized map has been assessed for
is located between 90°21′42.195″E to 90°21′27.465″E and accuracy using the kappa index (Foody 2002; Pontius and
23°50′55.249″N to 23°44′46.334″N. The study area is a total Millones 2011; Story and Congalton 1986).
of 48.834 ­km2. The area of interest is situated in Dhaka Met-
ropolitan (DMP) area. Eight (8) “Thana” boundaries such Estimation of land surface temperature (LST)
as Mirpur, Adabor, Mohammadpur, Pallabi, Darus Salam,
Shah Ali, Kafrul, and Sher-e-Bangla Nagar cover the study Estimating LST from Satellite imageries follows a simple
region (Fig. 1). methodological hierarchy. Firstly, atmospheric radiance has
to be calculated from the raw data collected by the thermal
Methodology band. Then, this atmospheric radiance has to be converted
to sensor brightness temperature. Lastly, using this sensor
The primary approach of the study is based on satellite brightness temperature, LST can be retrieved. A detailed
images. The satellite image spans a greater region and has description of the process has been given below.
several spectral bands that may be utilized for environmental
study. On the other hand, satellite images may give histori- a. Top of Atmospheric Spectral Radiance: Top of Atmos-
cal data that can be useful for trend analysis from the past to pheric Spectral Radiance (TOA) was retrieved (Liu and
the present. Futures may also be anticipated using this trend Zhang 2011).
analysis and the development of an equation. Landsat images b. Sensor brightness temperature estimation (Ti): First
were collected from the United States Geological Survey and foremost, conversion from the spectral radiance of
(USGS) website. Before 2013, Landsat TM 4–5 data and thermal infrared band to active radiance sensor bright-
after then Landsat OLI 8 data have been used for the study. ness temperature was calculated (Liu and Zhang 2011;
The absolute calibration of the Landsat 8 Thermal Infrared Maduako et al. 2016; Rahman et al. 2017a; Sholihah and
Sensor (Band 11) has been impacted by out-of-field light Shibata 2019).
since launch. This study makes an attempt to estimate LST c. Retrieving LST: Thermal infrared wavelengths are used
using Landsat 8’s Band 10 in order to deal with this issue. to determine Top of Atmosphere (TOA) brightness.
Landsat 8’s estimated LST was cross-checked against tem- Meanwhile, to get an accurate land surface brightness
perature data from other sources, including the thermal band temperature, atmospheric influences such as upward
of Landsat 4–5, despite Band 10’s shorter wavelength. All emission and downward irradiance reflected from the
the Landsat images are taken for November to get cloud-free surface should be adjusted. Calculating the land sur-
images. After downloading the data, sequentially land cover, face spectral emissivity (Ɛ) enables the aforementioned
LST, NDVI, and NDBI were calculated. Using the data, LST adjustment to be made. Meanwhile, some elements such
and land cover were predicted for the next 30 years (till as water content, chemical composition, structure, and
2049). Meanwhile, the calculated data were validated using roughness all affect the emissivity of the surface (Zine

13

Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.


Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023) 30:1428–1450 1431

Fig. 1  Location of the study 90°19'30"E

area

23°51'0"N

23°51'0"N
Pallabi

Shah Ali

Mirpur
Kafrul

Darus Salam

Adabor
Sher-e-bangla Nagar
23°45'30"N

23°45'30"N
Mohammadpur

Z
90°19'30"E 90°25'0"E

Study Area
Legend
Study Boundary
Dhaka Metropolitan Area (DMP)

0 0.3 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4


Kilometers Scale: 1:59,180

Spatial Reference: Bangladesh Transverse Mercator (BTM)


Index Map Dhaka Metropolitan Area Datum: Everest 1830

El Abidine et al. 2014). Numerous scholars have dem- (Ɛ) can be measured by following Eq. 5 (d’Entremont
onstrated that the surface emissivity is highly correlated and Thomason 1987; Good and Giordano 2019). The
with the NDVI, and so the emissivity can be calculated land surface temperatures corrected for spectral emis-
using the NDVI (Rouse et al. 1973). NDVI can be cal- sivity (Ɛ) were computed (Avdan and Jovanovska 2016;
culated using the reflectance values of the visible and Chaudhuri and Mishra 2016; Ullah et al. 2019; Xiong
near-infrared bands (Rouse et al. 1973). Using the NDVI et al. 2012). LST represents land surface temperature (in
value, the proportion of vegetation ­(Pv) can be calculated Kelvin). To get values in Celsius, LST has to be modi-
to measure land surface emissivity (Ɛ) by using Eq. 4 fied by adding absolute zero (− 273.15 °C); Ti was the
(Liu and Zhang 2011). Using ­Pv, land surface emissivity sensor’s brightness temperature. The emitted radiance’s

13

Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.


1432 Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023) 30:1428–1450

Fig. 2  Flow diagram of image


processing procedure

wavelength was indicated as 𝜆 and Ɛ indicates the land were transformed in ArcGIS software 10.6.1 for the better
surface spectral emissivity. performance of the model. The model was developed using
the past 20 years’ data (1999–2019) as the input parameters
The Normalized Difference Built-up Index (NDBI) for predicting the future year 2039 data.
employs the near-infrared (NIR) and short-wave infrared
(SWIR) bands to highlight manufactured built-up regions. Field verification techniques of LULC
It is ratio-based to account for changes in landscape light-
ing and atmospheric influences. NDBI is calculated as Google Earth displays satellite and aerial imagery in a world-
(SWIR − NIR) / (SWIR + NIR) (Zha et al. 2003). wide mosaic of varying resolutions, as well as additional
data such as photos, addresses, and more. Additionally, it
Simulation of land cover and LST permits the creation of geometric primitives like points,
lines, and polygons, as well as properties like vector format
The CA-ANN model is designed to simulate land use (KML). When zooming in on a specific area, different types
changes through a multiple output neuron. The network out- of images are displayed depending on the level of detail
put layer decides the possibilities of multiple land uses with desired. These images range from continental-scale SPOT5
multiple output neurons. The appropriate parameters for the and Landsat images to aerial orthophotos, IKONOS, and
simulation are calculated automatically by the neural net- QuickBird images to GeoEye-1, Worldview-1, and World-
work training process. The CA-ANN model does not include view-2 images for urbanized areas. When a user zooms in
specific transfer rules. The only function is to train the neural on a particular area, the name of the data source and the col-
network to achieve empirical parameter values. Many factors lection date are shown in the bottom portion of the window.
can be added to the model to improve the precise simulation. In the latest version of Google Earth, you can now access
A combination of cellular automata and ANN models will archive pictures, which may be used to see how things have
produce a better LULC and LST transition spatio-temporal changed over time. Only by examining the dimensions of
pattern (Mondal et al. 2016; Parsa et al. 2016). the features detected can the ground sample distance and
The LST and LULC for the year 2039 with the help of picture resolution be calculated. There is no mismatch or
MOLUSCE Plugin in QGIS 2.18 are typically predicted seam with other pictures in terms of the spatial expansion of
with an ANN. ANN is an effective method that helps to these images inside the Grande Raccordo Anulare.
forecast future LST and LULC using data sets from previ- The accuracy parameters include the overall accuracy,
ous years (Civco 1993; Maduako et al. 2016; Shatnawi and producer accuracy, user accuracy, and the kappa coefficients.
Abu Qdais 2019). LST simulation was performed in this The overall accuracy is determined by multiplying the error
study using input parameters LULC images, NDVI, NDBI, matrix by the total number of corrected samples. Histori-
latitude, and longitude as output parameters for LST (Gopal cally, the term “producer accuracy” has been defined as the
and Woodcock 1996; Maduako et al. 2016). Besides, the ratio of the total number of accurate sample units within
CA-ANN model for the future LULC was used in the predic- a category to the total number of sample units within that
tion of input parameters of road layers, NDBI, NDVI, lati- category. This accuracy metric is based on the capability
tude, and longitude data. The pixel value data of the images of accurately identifying a reference sample unit and is a

13

Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.


Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023) 30:1428–1450 1433

real indicator of omission error. When the total number of change in each LULC class over time. Between 2009 and
accurate category sample units is divided by the total num- 2019, the quantity of bare and vegetated land decreased con-
ber of row sample units on a map (e.g., the total number of siderably (by roughly 10%). During the same time span, the
row sample units), the result is a commission error measure. built-up area expanded by a factor of two (21% of the study
This is referred to as “user accuracy” or “reliability,” and area). Finally, the water body declined by 1% of the studied
it reflects the likelihood that a sample unit specified on the area between 2009 and 2019.
map is located on the ground. Following the calculation of
all accuracy parameters, the kappa coefficient was deter- Percent change analysis of different LULCs
mined (Congalton and Green 2008; Foody 2002; Pontius
and Millones 2011; Story and Congalton 1986). During the 1989–2019 study period, LULC categories were
While this work makes a contribution to measuring UHI converted into other categories and thus losses and gains
by the use of location-dependent meteorological, physiologi- of LULC categories were also examined (Table 1). The
cal, and environmental data, it has numerous drawbacks. Due results indicate that built-up area was generally increasing
to a lack of observed temperature data, this research relied and water bodies and vegetation land were decreasing sig-
on satellite-derived data. Landsat images were acquired in nificantly during the study period. For the years 1989 to
the early morning for this investigation (10:18 AM). How- 1994, built-up area and bare land area were gained 6.485%
ever, the air temperature rises significantly throughout the and 4.158% area, respectively, whereas vegetation and water
afternoon and evening. Despite these shortcomings, this bodies were lost by 7.930% and 2.713% of their area, respec-
research provides a complete approach for estimating UHI. tively. Similar to the year 1994–1999, a significant increase
The technique used in this research, as well as the findings, in the built-up area and a very moderate increase in bare land
will aid planners and policymakers in identifying variables and vegetation area were found and the percentages were
related to UHI. The methodology offered in this research shown by 12.717%, 1.653%, and 2.056%, respectively. Only
will help them to develop mitigation plans, policies, and dramatic loss in water bodies of 16.445% was recorded from
strategies, as well as prioritize and sequence adaptation 1994 to 1999. Moreover, from 1999 to 2004, except built-up
actions based on the degree of UHI. area, other three LULC classes were facing decreasing trend.
Built-up area gained 11.906% whereas bare land, water bod-
ies, and vegetation land lost 7.686%, 3.421%, and 0.789%
Results area respectively. From 1999, the percentage of built-up area
has started to increase because of the conversion of large
Land use land cover classification percentage of bare land to built-up area.
From 2004 to 2009, built-up area gained 23.281% area
The LULC map for 1989, 1994, 1999, 2004, 2009, 2014, and whereas bare land, vegetation, and water bodies were
2019 was generated using MLSC (Fig. 3a−f). The study’s reduced to 17.748%, 4.228%, and 1.305% respectively.
entire area is roughly 48.830 k­ m2. The categorized picture From 2009 to 2014, built-up area gained by 12.425%
from 1989 revealed a larger proportion of area for bare ter- whereas bare land, vegetation, and water bodies reduced to
rain, aquatic bodies, and vegetation, respectively, at 35.04%, 2.847%, 8.863%, and 0.715% respectively. Considering the
27.34%, and 24.9%. For 1989, the built-up area was just year 2014–2019, built-up area gained by 7.499% whereas
12.56% (Fig. 3a). In 1994, bare ground had the most area bare land, vegetation, and water bodies were reduced to
(39.20%), followed by water bodies (24.63%) and vegeta- 6.679%, 0.383%, and 0.440% respectively. Overall, the high-
tion (17.04%) (Fig. 3b). In 1994, built-up area increased by est losses (bare land and vegetation) and gains (urban area)
7% over 1989 levels. The continuing upward trend in bare was observed in the 2004–2014 period. However, the water
land (40.45%) and built-up area (31.85%) was accelerated body expansively was lost its coverage from 1994 to 1999
in 1999, mostly due to growing urbanization. Water bodies (Table 1).
(8.19%) and vegetative land (19.11%) have seen a decline
in recent years due to the transfer of natural surfaces to bare Field validation of LULC
ground and later to built-up land (Fig. 3c). In 2004, bare land
(33.15%) continued to decline due to the conversion of bare Table 2 demonstrates the classification of overall accuracy,
land to urban built-up areas (43.76%). Filling up water bod- kappa coefficient, and validation of land use classification.
ies (4.77%) and vegetative land (18.32%) that were initially For the year 2019, the overall accuracy was over 90% and
bare land and were eventually moved to built-up areas began the result of the kappa coefficient was 0.83. The accuracy
to speed in 2004 (Fig. 3d). level is classified as very strong when the kappa coefficient
The categorized LULC findings for 2009, 2014, and 2019 is greater than 0.75 (Congalton and Green 2008; Foody
were compared (Fig. 3e−f) by calculating the percentage 2002; Pontius and Millones 2011; Story and Congalton

13

Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.


1434 Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023) 30:1428–1450

Fig. 3  Classified land use land


cover map of the study area in
(a) (b)
(a) 1989, (b) 1994, (c) 1999, (d)
2004, (e) 2009, (f) 2014, and
(g) 2019

(c) (d)

1986). To validate the land use classification, 50 sampling Estimation of land surface temperature (LST)
points were compared with the corresponding point on
Google Earth images over the same period. In conclusion, Figure 4a−g indicate the spatial pattern of LST distribution.
the overall classification accuracy, kappa coefficient sta- In all maps, bright yellow tone represents higher temperature
tistics, and validation all show good accuracy which is and a greenish tone represents low surface temperature. LST
suitable for LULC simulation. concentration and spatial and temporal LST patterns display

13

Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.


Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023) 30:1428–1450 1435

Fig. 3  (continued) (e) (f)

(g)

Water Body
Vegetation Land
Built-up Area
Bare Land

rapid changes in LULC groups. The core built-up area is of less than 20–24 °C. From 1999 and 2004, temperature
sensitive to high temperatures. As the images were taken in decreased slightly and the reason is Bangladesh went under
the month of November which is generally the winter season massive flood during that period.
in Bangladesh, therefore, the displayed data will show the In that period, surface water existed for a long period. For
temperature of the corresponding winter season of the years. that, temperature was comparatively lower than the previ-
Figure 4a and b focus on annual surface temperature con- ous year and LST varied 20–32 °C (Fig. 4c and d). In the
ditions of 1989 and 1994 and LST varied within the range year of 2009, the LST varied 20–32 °C (Fig. 4d). For 2014

13

Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.


1436 Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023) 30:1428–1450

Table 1  Percentage change of LULCs in the study area from 1989 to 2019
LULC Area in ­km2 Change in %
1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019 1994–1989 1999–1994 2004–1999 2009–2004 2014–2009 2019–2014

Water body 13.4 12.03 4.00 2.33 1.69 1.34 1.13 − 2.713 − 16.445 − 3.421 − 1.305 − 0.715 − 0.440
Urban area 6.2 9.34 15.55 21.37 32.74 38.81 42.47 6.485 12.717 11.906 23.281 12.425 7.499
Vegetation 12.2 8.32 9.33 8.95 6.88 2.56 2.37 − 7.930 2.075 − 0.789 − 4.228 − 8.863 − 0.380
Bare land 17.1 19.14 19.95 16.19 7.52 6.13 2.87 4.158 1.653 − 7.696 − 17.748 − 2.847 − 6.679
Total 48.83 48.83 48.83 48.83 48.83 48.83 48.83

and 2019, the LST was found at the highest peak because increased to 89.09% within the LST range of 24–28 °C.
of the significant increase of built-up area and reduction of During this period, significant increase in built-up area
water bodies and vegetation land. From 2014 to 2019, LST and a reduction of water bodies and vegetation area were
varied from 24 °C to more than 34 °C (Fig. 4e−g). The noticed (Table 3).
north-western part of the study area exhibited a lowering in The built-up area continued to increase from 2009 to
temperature due to higher vegetation and agricultural land 2014 and from 2014 to 2019 (Table 3) which resulted in the
whereas the southeastern part exhibits a rise in LST due to increase of LST by more than 32 °C. The maximum area
rapid urban expansion and decline of water bodies as well of temperature was found within 28–32 °C (35.784% area)
as vegetation land. and it was 52.136% area from 2009 to 2014. Here, 1.273%
and 0.238% area increased to more than 32 °C from the year
Percent change in LST 2009 to 2014. The increase of built-up area and reduction
of water bodies and vegetation land were dominant from the
The percent change in LST will provide a better insight year 2009 which contributed to an increase of LST by more
into the temperature variation at different ranges of than 32 °C from 2009.
LST. From 1989 to 1994, the highest percentage of the
area (30.946%) was lost in having LST below 20 °C Validation of LST
range. Also, 30.928% area increased within the range of
20–24 °C. Due to the abundance of vegetation and water Aside from the stray light issue, the computed LST using
bodies, the temperature range above 28 °C was found just Landsat 8 Band 10 cannot be accepted until cross-val-
unavailable (Table 3). From 1989 to 1994, the highest idation because of the band’s short wave length. The simu-
percentage of the area (57.063%) was lost in having LST lation of future LST patterns was estimated on the basis
below 20 °C range. Also, 54.829% area increased within of 1989 to 2019 data at 5-year interval period and BMD
the range of 20–24 °C. Due to the abundance of vegetation Agargaon station’s data was available. Estimated LST data
and water bodies, the temperature range above 32 °C was has a minimum and maximum LST value and BMD data
found unavailable (Table 3). also had minimum and maximum temperature data. There-
Due to heavy floods in 2004, LST reduced to less fore, the percentage of error was calculated in two ways
than 20 °C from 1999 to 2004 (Table 3). But, from the considering maximum and minimum LST and tempera-
year 2004 to 2009, the maximum percentage of the area ture values (Table 4). After validating both source data,

Table 2  Accuracy Assessment for 2019 LULC


Year Classified Class Validation points for different LULC classes
Water Body Urban Area Vegetation Cover Bare Land Total User Accuracy

2019 Water 10 0 1 0 11 90.91


Built up Area 0 15 0 1 16 93.75
Vegetation 0 2 11 1 12 91.67
Bare Land 1 1 0 9 11 81.82
Total 11 16 12 11 50
Producer Accuracy 90.91 93.75 91.67 81.82 Overall Accuracy Kappa Coefficient
90% 83.85

13

Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.


Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023) 30:1428–1450 1437

Fig. 4  Land surface temperature


distribution in the year (a) 1989,
(a) (b)
(b) 1994, (c) 1999, (d) 2004, (e)
2009, (f) 2014, and (g) 2019

(c) (d)

the minimum and maximum temperature errors for the MODIS Land Surface Temperature (LST) and Emissiv-
year 2014 were estimated as 3.678% and 4.982%, respec- ity daily data (1 km pixels) offers geospatially enabled
tively. However, BMD only have one station for the entire LST. Therefore, MODIS Land Surface Temperature/Emis-
Dhaka City that too does not lie inside the study area. sivity Daily L3 Global 1 km (MOD11A1) data has been
Hence, further and more accurate validation is necessary. chosen to test the accuracy of the predicted LST derived

13

Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.


1438 Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023) 30:1428–1450

Fig. 4  (continued) (e) (f)

(g)

LST in 0C
<20 24-28
20-24 28-32

>32

from Landsat 8’s Band 10 image (Leya et al. 2022). These Association of LST and LULC
MOD11A1 data obtains spatio-temporal validation as they
are of the same date and falls in the research region. Mean Cross‑sectional profile of LULC vs LST
and standard variation of the MOD11A1 data indicated
that there is a non-significant small difference between The most effective method for determining the effect of
MODIS and Landsat means and therefore the estimation LULC on LST is to study the relationships between ther-
of LST was acceptable for further processing (Table 5). mal signatures and land cover types. The thermal infrared

13

Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.


Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023) 30:1428–1450 1439

Table 3  Percentage change of LSTs in the study area from 1989 to 2019 ­(km2)
LST range Area in ­km2 Change in %
1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019 1994–1989 1999–1994 2004–1999 2009–2004 2014–2009 2019–2014

< 20 °C 43.11 28 0.13 12.01 0 0 0 − 30.95 − 57.06 24.33 − 24.60 0 0


20–24 °C 5.02 20.12 46.89 34.93 3.30 0 0 30.93 54.83 − 24.51 − 64.76 − 6.76 0
24–28 °C 0.70 0.71 1.12 1.20 44.71 21.93 4.46 0.02 0.83 0.17 89.10 − 46.65 − 35.78
28–32 °C 0 0 0.69 0.69 0.82 26.28 43.64 0 1.41 0.009 0.27 52.14 35.55
> 32 °C 0 0 0 0 0 0.62 0.74 0 0 0 0 1.27 0.24
Total 48.83 48.83 48.83 48.83 48.83 48.83 48.83

Table 4  Validation of LST simulation based on the estimated LST for in 1989, > 25 °C in 1994, > 27 °C in 1999, 28 °C in
the year 2014 2004, > 30 °C in 2009, > 31 °C in 2014, and > 33 °C in
Year Temperature from satellite image BMD data Percent- 2019 for bare land in seven different years’ cross-sections.
age of Besides, the other two LULCs (water bodies and vegeta-
error tion) were recorded as having the lowest temperature rang-
2014 Minimum temperature ing from 16 to 27 °C. The findings signify that built-up area
24.883 24.000 3.678 increases LST by replacing natural vegetation with non-
Maximum temperature evaporating and non-transpiring surfaces.
32.545 31.000 4.982
LULC wise LST distribution

Table 5  Validation of LST simulation based on the estimated LST The distribution of LST in different LULC classes in vari-
using MODIS ous ranges demonstrates the LULC wise LST concentra-
Satellite Maximum value Minimum value tion in the study area. Considering the LST distribution in
different LULC classes for the year 1989, most of the area
MODIS Landsat MODIS Landsat
was experienced below 20 °C in every LULC class and the
Year 1989 29.7 28.3 17.9 18.6 covered area under 20 °C was 15.40 k­ m2 in water bodies,
1994 27.3 26.9 19.2 18.4 12.27 ­km2 in bare land, 3.24 k­ m2 in built-up area, and 12.20
1999 26.66 27.65 19.2 18.3 ­km2 in vegetation cover (Table 6). In 1994, most of the area
2004 31.73 31.25 20.5 19.8 experienced below 20 °C for all LULC and the dominated
2009 28.25 29.3 19.37 20.19 LULC was bare land (14.08 ­km2), water bodies (10.35 ­km2),
2014 30.15 31.19 23.15 23.6 and vegetation (2.91 ­km2). At LST range 20–24 °C, 7.97
2019 31.73 32.73 26.27 26.86 ­km2, 5.41 k­ m2, and 5.06 k­ m2 areas were recorded as built-up
Mean 29.36 29.61 20.79 20.82 area, vegetation land, and bare land respectively (Table 6).
SD 2.03 2.16 2.92 3.23 For the year 1999, the highest range was 20–24 °C and
the maximum coverage of LULC class was bare land (19.11
­km2), followed by built-up area (15.75 k­ m2) and vegetation
radiation emitted from the ground’s surface, including roofs, land (5.30 ­km2) (Table 6).
pavements, plants, bare soil, and water bodies, was measured In 2004, the highest range of LST was 20–24 °C and the
and stored as LST using remotely sensed sensors. Two cross- maximum LULC classes were built-up area (18.05 k­ m2),
sections were taken over the research region to represent followed by bare land area (12.13 ­km2). The lowest LST
the LST for each LULC type, and the average LST for each was found at water bodies (1.42 ­km2) that were below 20 °C
LULC type is presented in Fig. 5a−g. Two cross-sections (Table 6). In the year 2009, the highest range of tempera-
were investigated, one from northwest to southeast (AB) and ture was 24–28 °C and the maximum coverage of LULC
one from northeast to southwest (CD). class was in the urban area (31.90 k­ m2), followed by bare
From the profile, it was found that congested built- land area (6.75 ­km2). The lowest temperature was recorded
up area experienced average LST more than 24 °C in in an urban area (0.02 ­km2) under 20–24 °C temperature
1989 (Fig. 5a), > 27 °C in 1994 (Fig. 5b), > 28 °C in (Table 6).
1999 (Fig. 5c), 29 °C in 2004 (Fig. 5d), > 30 °C in 2009 As the built-up area is continuously increasing, therefore,
(Fig. 5e), > 32 °C in 2014 (Fig. 5f), and > 34 °C in 2019 LST values got momentum from 2014 to 2019. In 2014,
(Fig. 5g). Also, the highest LST was recorded as 22 °C the highest percentage of built-up areas was found in the

13

Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.


1440 Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023) 30:1428–1450

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

(e) (f)

(g)

Fig. 5  Cross-sectional profile of LULC vs LST for the year (a) 1989, (b) 1994, (c) 1999, (d) 2004, (e) 2009, (f) 2014, and (g) 2019

13

Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.


Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023) 30:1428–1450 1441

Table 6  LULC wise LST distribution from 1989 to 2019 range of 28–32 °C and 24–28 °C with corresponding areas
Temperature < 20 °C 20–24 °C 24–28 °C 28–32 °C > 32 °C of 23.04 k­ m2 and 15.15 k­ m2 respectively. In 2019, 0.61 k­ m2
and 40.94 k­ m2 of built-up areas were found to have more
Land cover 1989 (area in ­km2) than 32 °C and 28–32 °C respectively (Table 6).
Water body 15.40 0.00 - - -
Built-up 3.24 2.89 0.70 - - Relationship among LST, NDVI, and NDBI
area
Vegetation 12.20 0.00 - - -
land
Two land cover indices, the NDVI and the NDBI, were
Bare land 12.27 2.12 - - -
developed in order to quantify the link between LST and
Land cover 1994
the indices. The lower NDVI value was associated with a
Water body 10.35 1.68 - - -
greater LST level in this study. Additionally, the NDVI score
Built-up 0.66 7.97 0.71 - -
in the studied region decreased from − 0.1 to − 0.3 between
area 1989 and 2019. The lower NDVI value corresponds to paved
Vegetation 2.91 5.41 - - - ground, bare soil, and rock, all of which result in elevated
land surface temperatures. Low NDVI values (0.2 to 0.3) cor-
Bare land 14.08 5.06 - - respond to shrubs and grassland, whereas high values cor-
Land cover 1999 respond to green surfaces.
Water body 0.09 3.91 0.00 0.00 - On the contrary, the NDBI value increased steadily,
Built-up 0.00 14.54 0.32 0.69 - resulting in greater LST levels. From 1989 to 2019, the
area results of linear regression and multiple correlations reveal
Vegetation 0.04 9.33 0.00 0.00 - that LST has a significant and positive connection with
land
NDBI and a strong and negative correlation with NDVI
Bare land 0.00 19.11 0.84 0.00 -
(Fig. 6a−g). In all correlation analyses, the R2 value was
Land cover 2004
greater than 0.75, indicating that the variables were highly
Water body 1.42 0.39 0.00 0.00 -
linked. By entering the value of an independent variable
Built-up 1.94 18.05 1.20 0.69 -
area
such as LST for each year, the resulting linear regression
Vegetation 4.59 4.36 0.00 0.00 -
formula developed an equation for forecasting the depend-
land ent variable NDVI or NDBI. The equation fluctuates year
Bare land 4.06 12.13 0.00 0.00 - to year and may be used to model more complex relation-
Land cover 2009 ships between LST, NDBI, and NDVI. Additionally, the
Water body - 1.32 0.37 0 - correlation coefficient for each equation with a complicated
Built-up - 0.02 31.90 0.82 - relationship between variables may be addressed in greater
area detail in future research (Fig. 6a−g).
Vegetation - 1.45 5.43 0 -
land LULC prediction for the year 2039
Bare land - 0.51 6.75 0 -
Land cover 2014 LULC classes in the research region changed considerably
Water body - - 1.33 0.01 0.00 throughout the study period (1989–2019). It was neces-
Built-up - - 15.18 23.04 0.59 sary to predict future LULC dynamics because, if historical
area
trends continue, LST would change, affecting both biodiver-
Vegetation - - 1.23 1.33 0.00
land
sity and microclimate in the research region. Additionally,
Bare land - - 4.19 1.89 0.03
the future LULC forecast is critical because it establishes a
Land cover 2019
foundation for sustainable urban design. Additionally, the
Water body - - 0.92 0.21 0.00 variance in LST analysis from 1999 to 2019 demonstrated a
Built-up - - 0.92 40.94 0.61 noticeable shift. As a result, it was critical to forecast future
area LST trends. The CA-ANN model was used to forecast future
Vegetation - - 1.84 0.53 0.00 LULC and LST for the year 2039 by analyzing the research
land area’s historical LULC and LST trends. The prediction’s
Bare land - - 0.78 1.95 0.14 accuracy was confirmed using the proportion of right pre-
dictions, the overall kappa value, the kappa location value,
and the kappa history value for the predicted variables. The
model validation findings for transition potential modeling
indicated that the total kappa index and percent-correctness

13

Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.


1442 Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023) 30:1428–1450

Fig. 6  Correlation between LST (a)


vs NDVI and NDBI in the year
(a) 1989, (b) 1994, (c) 1999, (d)
2004, (e) 2009, (f) 2014, and
(g) 2019

(b)

Water Body
Vegetation Land
Built-up Area
Bare Land

13

Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.


Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023) 30:1428–1450 1443

Table 7  ANN model validation for LULC in QGIS MOLUSCE geometry and Dhaka City’s unexpected growth triggers this
Plugin devastating impact of the increase of LST.
Prediction ANN model validation for LULC prediction
year
QGIS-MOLUSCE Plugin module
Discussion
%-correct- Overall Kappa loca- Kappa histo
ness kappa value tion
The impact of LULC fluctuations on the LST in Dhaka’s
2039 84.56% 0.84508 0.8529 0.8852 northwest region (Mirpur and the surrounding area) was
measured during a 5-year period between 1989 and 2019,
with forecasts extending to 2039. Prior research on LULC
value were 84% (Table 7), which is an acceptable degree of alterations and LST was useful for conducting this study
accuracy for LULC modeling. The model validation result and comparing its results with those of other studies. This
shown in Fig. 8a was obtained using the QGIS program. study indicated an increase in the amount of developed and
Simulation results showed that approximately 92% of the barren land and a decrease in the amount of vegetation and
area will be converted into built-up area in 2039 (Fig. 7b). water bodies, which is in line with prior findings (Ahmed
Predicted LULC change in future could adversely affect the et al. 2013; Dewan and Yamaguchi 2009a, b; Mia et al.
environment altering both climate and biodiversity of the area. 2017). Ahmed et al. (2013) observed that the urban area in
The percentage of change indicates that in 2039, built- Dhaka City rose from 15.68 to 36.91% between 1989 and
up area would increase about 5.5% higher than 2019 if this 2009, while vegetation declined from 19.97 to 8.53%. For
pattern continues. Moreover, 92.42% of Mirpur and the sur- the Mirpur region alone, this study found that waterbod-
rounding area would convert into built-up area and there will ies, vegetation, and barren ground dropped by 27.44% to
be a drastic reduction of other LULC such as vegetation, 2.3%, 24.98% to 4.85%, and 35.02 percentage points, respec-
bare land, and water bodies (Table 8). tively. On the other hand, the built-up area has expanded
from 12.6 to 86.98%, a 585% increase in the measured time
period. Ahmed et al. (2013) predicted that Dhaka’s built-up
LST prediction for 2039 area will grow to 49% by 2019. And this study found that
increased urbanization has mostly affected the city’s north-
The simulated result showed a strong agreement that con- western suburbs. Butt et al. (2011) stated that built-up area
firmed the accuracy of the ANN model’s prediction for 2039 expanded from 18.22 to 27.86% and thick forest/mixed veg-
with 91.856% correctness and 0.9362 overall kappa value etation declined from 34.07 to 27.33% from 1972 to 2009
(Table 9). Based on the ANN model validation in other in Islamabad, Pakistan. In the instance of the north-western
research, the percentage of correctness value over 80% dem- region of Dhaka, land cover underwent a dramatic trans-
onstrates strong agreement of accuracy. formation across the whole research period. The lowland
The validation provided an excellent accuracy with more of the research area was filled with sand and transformed
than 90% of correctness for the simulated LST map in 2039 to bare land. Imran et al. (2021a, b) observed that housing,
(Fig. 8a). Similar to the LULC for the study period from settlement, and industry had caused a loss of wet and veg-
1989 to 2019, LST also shows a substantial amount of etation land in Dhaka’s northeast and northwest suburbs,
change. Accordingly, LST is simulated for 2039. The past which verifies the study’s finding of a rising tendency. Most
trends of estimated LST data are used in the ANN model to of the bare lands in 1989 turned into the built-up area in
predict the future LST trends of the study area. Mirpur region. Most of the vegetation cover, water bod-
The prediction exhibited that approximately 23.69% of ies, and low-lying land also converted to the built-up area,
the Mirpur area is likely to have LST greater than 32 °C which affected environmental biodiversity and natural habi-
and 72.62% area is likely to remain 28–32 °C LST range. tat (Alphan 2003).
There may not be any temperature area that might experi- Population increases in Dhaka City because of a greater
ence below 28 °C LST. The change of percentage of area birth rate and migration from rural to urban areas, as well
is around 22.18% which will fall within the range of LST as the city’s social and economic development, which led
greater than 32 °C in 2039 (Table 10). The prediction results to urbanization (Dewan and Yamaguchi 2009a, b). Migra-
demonstrate that most of the LST remain below 32 °C. Fig- tion from rural to urban areas accounted for the majority
ure 8b shows the rising trend of LST in the study area for of Dhaka’s rapid population rise. Substantial urbanization
the year 2039. has already happened to meet the needs of a larger popu-
This effect of high LST is going to be a worrying problem lation, and it has had a negative influence on the limited
for the study area. The temperature effect depends on the city natural resources because of ongoing overexploitation. The
extension of the urban area of Dhaka City was not evenly

13

Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.


1444 Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023) 30:1428–1450

0.6 0.5
(a) y = 0.0555x - 1.0381 (b) 0.4 y = 0.0417x - 0.8122
0.4 R² = 0.9957 R² = 0.9837
0.3
0.2 0.2
Values

Values
0 0.1
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 0
-0.2
-0.1 19 21 23 25 27
Year (20xx) y = -0.0765x + 1.6755
-0.4 -0.2
R² = 0.9778 Year (20xx)
-0.3 y = -0.0578x + 1.3703
R² = 0.9757
NDVI NDBI NDVI LST
Linear (NDVI) Linear (NDBI) Linear (NDVI) Linear (LST)

0.6 0.5 y = 0.034x - 0.6574


(c) y = 0.047x - 1.0294 (d) R² = 0.9965
0.4
0.4 R² = 0.9824
0.3
0.2

Values
Values

0.2
0 0.1
19 21 23 25 27 29 0
-0.2
Year (20xx) -0.1 16 18 20 22 24 26 28

-0.4 y = -0.0646x + 1.661 -0.2 Year (20xx)


R² = 0.9616
y = -0.0422x + 1.1007
R² = 0.9894
NDVI NDBI NDVI NDBI
Linear (NDVI) Linear (NDBI) Linear (NDVI) Linear (NDBI)

0.5 y = 0.0572x - 1.394 0.5 y = 0.0537x - 1.5944


(e) (f)
0.4 R² = 0.9976 0.4 R² = 0.9292

0.3 0.3
0.2
Values

Values

0.2
0.1
0.1
0
0 -0.1 24 26 28 30 32
22 24 26 28 30
-0.1 -0.2 Year (20xx) y = -0.048x + 1.5603
-0.2 Year (20xx) -0.3 R² = 0.9738
y = -0.071x + 2.0151
R² = 0.9909

NDVI NDBI NDVI NDBI


Linear (NDVI) Linear (NDBI) Linear (NDVI) Linear (NDBI)

0.5
(g) y = 0.0518x - 1.6006
0.4 R² = 0.9463
0.3
0.2
Values

0.1
0
-0.1 25 27 29 31 33 35
-0.2
-0.3 Year (20xx)
-0.4 y = -0.0461x + 1.5613
R² = 0.9851

NDVI NDBI
Linear (NDVI) Linear (NDBI)

Fig. 7  a LULC prediction model validation result for the year 2039 and (b) simulated LULC map for the year 2039

distributed in all directions; rather, urban expansion was the built-up area, although the contribution of built-up area
concentrated on the city’s outskirts. The northern region of to other land cover was minimal. LST heat zones migrated
the city of Dhaka saw rapid urbanization. Lowland, bare soil, to a higher temperature zone with the growth of built-up
vegetation, and water body all contributed to a net change in area and bare land, and the probable cause was an increase

13

Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.


Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023) 30:1428–1450 1445

Table 8  Percentage change of LULC Area ­km2 (2019) Area in % Area ­km2 (2039) Area in % Change in %
LULCs in the study area from (2039–2019)
2019 to 2039
Water body 1.1259 2.31 1.12 2.29 − 0.012
Built-up area 42.4674 86.96 45.13 92.42 5.459
Vegetation 2.3697 4.85 2.05 4.19 − 0.664
Bare land 2.871 5.88 0.53 1.09 − 4.788
Total 48.83 100.00 48.83 100.00

Table 9  ANN model validation for LST in QGIS MOLUSCE Plugin center of English Bazar, West Bengal, India, but the change
Prediction ANN model validation for LST prediction
of LULC and the movement of the heat zone from a low to
year a high rate in the Mirpur region was dramatic.
QGIS-MOLUSCE Plugin module According to the findings of this study, a large part of
%-correct- Overall Kappa loca- Kappa histo the UHI impact in Mirpur can be attributed to man-made
ness kappa value tion structures, such as buildings and paved surfaces. Evapotran-
2039 91.856 0.9362 0.9037 0.92582 spiration from plants may reduce LST, thereby reducing the
UHI impact (Li et al. 2012; Myint et al. 2013). In the Mirpur
region, however, increasing green plant cover may not be the
in impervious surface, which stored solar heat throughout best technique for mitigating urban heat island effects (UHI).
the day and caused greater LST. Pal and Ziaul (2017) discov- Green vegetation provides cooling benefits and minimizes
ered a similar tendency of heat zone changing in the urban the impacts of paved surfaces; hence, optimizing land cover

(a) (b)

LST in 0C

Fig. 8  a LST prediction model validation result for the year 2039 and (b) simulated LST map for the year 2039

13

Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.


1446 Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023) 30:1428–1450

Table 10  Percentage change Range Area ­km2 (2019) Area in Area ­km2 (2039) Area in Change in
of LSTs in the study area from percentage percentage percentage
2019 to 2039 (2039–2019)

< 20 °C - - - - -
20–24 °C - - - - -
24–28 °C 4.46 9.13 1.80 3.69 − 5.44
28–32 °C 43.64 89.36 35.46 72.62 − 16.74
> 32 °C 0.74 1.51 11.57 23.69 22.18
Total 48.83 100 48.83 100

spatial layout is one option to optimize cooling and decrease When it comes to average annual maximum and minimum
warming effects. It was determined that big, continuous temperatures, Khan et al. (2019) found that between 1981 and
clusters of greenery had a greater cooling impact than frag- 2010, they rose by 0.3 and 0.4 °C every decade, respectively.
mented, dispersed greenery (Li et al. 2012; Maimaitiyiming According to the findings of Mullick et al. (2018), throughout
et al. 2014; Zhang et al 2009). the years 1966–2015, the average yearly temperature increased
In English Bazar urban center, West Bengal, India, Pal by 0.4 °C. There was a 1.38 °C rise in the minimum, mean,
and Ziaul (2017) observed an LST rise of 0.114 °C/year and maximum temperatures during the previous 49 years,
during the summer season. In contrast, the Mirpur region while the temperature ranges were 21.05 to 23.41 °C, 25.35
had an LST increase of 0.21 °C/year during the summer to 26.99 °C, and 30.13 to 31.70 °C. Because of this, land use
season across the whole research period. Although these change was not the only factor contributing to an overall rise in
two cities have comparable meteorological circumstances, LST throughout the course of the research period; the climatic
the urban growth scenarios were distinct; hence, urbaniza- change was also a significant factor. Based on these findings,
tion had a significant impact in the increase of LST in the land use and climate change have had a significant role in the
urban region. The spatial distribution of LST indicates that greater rise in LST in the area.
Mirpur area was influenced by higher temperature zones as The results in this article imply that high-density structures
the time progressed, and that regions of higher tempera- are unsuitable for urban environments. According to Zheng
ture heat zones extended as the built-up area and bareness et al. (2019), taller residential structures have negligible LST
increased. The growth of LST in newly developed built-up impacts in a neighborhood-scale residential area with sufficient
and undeveloped land was greater than that of all other land greenery and residential buildings, resulting in a strong cool
use types. Consequently, the primary finding of this research island effect. Urban sprawl must be restricted in this setting
is that LST increased with LULC modification owing to an to enhance the microclimate environment of Mirpur and the
increase in imperviousness. surrounding region. It is concluded that the lack of attention
Albedo analysis by Ejiagha et al. (2020) revealed that given by city planning officials to building construction, as
industrial and residential regions have greater and weaker well as the city’s unplanned and chaotic spatial expansion,
albedo values, respectively, indicating the importance of may be the driving causes of LST in Mirpur and thus across
rooftop materials in influencing LST. However, the influ- Dhaka City. However, without appropriate planning tools such
ence of LULC on LST varies depending on the land cover as decentralization, green belts, increasing open/green space in
composition of the area. After a certain percentage of land the core city through redevelopment/land readjustment tech-
is covered by buildings, the cooling benefits of such struc- niques, public awareness of city planning rules/regulations,
tures begin to diminish, according to Zheng et al. (2014). and increased responsibility on the part of the responsible
There were also higher connections between the spatial pat- authorities, it will be difficult to halt the negative effects of
terns of paved surfaces and LST in regions with more than spatial growth. On the other side, in highly populated places,
50% of paved surfaces and more than 90% of the combined building upgrades using green construction materials and roof-
proportion of paved surfaces and soils (Zheng et al. 2014). top plants may assist minimize LST.
The impervious layers of Mirpur and the adjacent region are
more thickly formed, including several high-rise structures
in the vicinity. Conclusions and recommendations
The influence of land cover change on the LST has previ-
ously been described; nevertheless, there was also an effect The study area faced a tremendous increase in built-up
of climate change. Climate change has led to a rise in tem- area. Increase in impervious layers’ trend will reflect more
perature in Bangladesh, according to several past research. heat and generate higher surface temperature. Considering

13

Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.


Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023) 30:1428–1450 1447

the year 2014–2019, built-up area gained 7.499% area to understand the magnitude, it is necessary to evaluate UHI
whereas bare land, vegetation, and water bodies were lost locally and nationwide.
6.679%, 0.383%, and 0.440% area, respectively. The maxi-
mum losses (bare land and vegetation) and gains (built- Acknowledgements All praises to Allah the benevolent, the Almighty,
and the kind. We wish to express my profound gratitude and sincere
up area) were observed in the 2004–2014 period. How- appreciation to Mohammad Shahriyar Parvez, Research Assistant, Cli-
ever, the water body expansively lost its coverage in the mate Change Lab, Department of Civil Engineering, Military Institute
1994–1999 periods. of Science and Technology (MIST), for his untiring support in revis-
The average surface temperature increasing rate is high ing and polishing this manuscript. Researcher, ANM Foyezur Rahman
expresses sincere gratitude to MIST Authority for providing partial
in 5-year interval period. In 1989, 88.284% of the area was financial support to accomplish his MSc research successfully.
covered under 20 °C temperature. Later, the maximum area
of temperature was increased to the range of 28–32 °C at Author contribution ANM Foyezur Rahman: methodology, software,
52.136% from the year 2009 to 2014. Here, 1.273% and data curation, writing—original draft preparation.
0.238% area were increased to more than 32 °C from the M Tauhid Ur Rahman: conceptualization, methodology, writing—
review and editing.
year 2009 to 2014 and from 2014 to 2019, respectively. The
increase of built-up area and reduction of surface water bod- Data availability Not applicable
ies and vegetation land were dominant from the year 2009
which contribute to the increase in the LST up to more than Declarations
32 °C from the year 2009. Validation of LST estimated data
with BMD data and MODIS LST guided the way forward Ethics approval Not applicable
in estimating the future LST.
Prediction indicates that in the year 2039, approximately Consent to participate Agree to participate
92.42% of Mirpur and its surrounding areas will be covered Consent for publication Agree to publish
by built-up area and the corresponding predicted LST range
will be greater than 32 °C. The prediction exhibited that Competing interests The author declares that this research work is his
approximately 23.69% of the Mirpur area is likely to have original work and has written it in its entirety. He has duly acknowl-
edged all the sources of information that have been used in the paper.
LST greater than 32 °C and 72.62% area is likely to remain
28–32 °C LST range. There may not be any area that might
experience a temperature below 28 °C LST, even in the
winter season. The change of percentage of area is around
22.18% which will fall within the range of LST greater than References
32 °C in 2039. The prediction results demonstrate that most
Ahmed B, Kamruzzaman M, Zhu X, Rahman MS, Choi K (2013) Sim-
of the LST remain below 32 °C. ulating land cover changes and their impacts on land surface tem-
The cross-section profile of LULC vs LST shows higher perature in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Remote Sens 5(11):5969–5998.
temperature existed in built-up areas in all time periods. In https://​doi.​org/​10.​3390/​rs511​5969
Alphan H (2003) Land-use change and urbanization of Adana, Turkey.
the year 2019, 0.61 ­km2 of the urban area was fallen more
Land Degrad Dev 14:575–586. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​ldr.​581
than 32 °C temperature range followed by 40.94 ­km2 in the Al-sharif AAA, Pradhan B (2014) Monitoring and predicting land use
range of 28–32 °C. LST has a strong and positive correlation change in Tripoli Metropolitan City using an integrated Markov
with NDBI. LST has a strong and negative correlation with chain and cellular automata models in GIS. Arab J Geosci
7(10):4291–4301
NDVI. In all the correlation analysis, the R2 was found more
Amiri R, Weng Q, Alimohammadi A, Alavipanah SK (2009) Spa-
than 0.9 which means the variables are strongly correlated tial–temporal dynamics of land surface temperature in relation to
with each other. The study shows a clear past and present fractional vegetation cover and land use/cover in the Tabriz urban
situation of the negative consequence of unplanned rapid area, Iran. Remote Sens Environ 113(12):2606–2617
Arsanjani JJ, Helbich M, Kainz W, Boloorani AD (2013) Integration
urbanization as well as predicts the future scenario of the
of logistic regression, Markov chain and cellular automata mod-
study region. els to simulate urban expansion. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf
The overall result shows a high LST change in the study 21:265–275
area. Mirpur area is located in the DMP area which is the Avdan U, Jovanovska G (2016) Algorithm for automated mapping of
land surface temperature using LANDSAT 8 satellite data. J Sens
most economically productive area of this country. There-
2016
fore, preparation steps to reduce LST, as well as UHI effects, Bahi H, Rhinane H, Bensalmia A, Fehrenbach U, Scherer D (2016)
are important. The seasonal change of LST in the study area, Effects of urbanization and seasonal cycle on the surface urban
which in a tropical country is very uncertain, needs cloud- heat island patterns in the coastal growing cities: a case study of
Casablanca, Morocco. Remote Sens 8(10):829
free satellite images. In summer region, cloud contains the
Balogun I, Ishola K (2017) Projection of future changes in landuse/
whole study region. If summer images could be collected, landcover using cellular automata/markov model over Akure city,
then actual LST effects can easily be realized. In addition, Nigeria. J Remote Sens Technol 5(1):22–31

13

Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.


1448 Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023) 30:1428–1450

Butt MJ, Waqas A, Iqbal MF, Muhammad G, Lodhi MAK (2011) Handayanto RT, Kim SM, Tripathi NK (2017) Land use growth simula-
Assessment of urban sprawl of Islamabad metropolitan area tion and optimization in the urban area
using multi-sensor and multi-temporal satellite data. Arab J Sci Hart MA, Sailor DJ (2009) Quantifying the influence of land-use and
Eng. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s13369-​011-​0148-3 surface characteristics on spatial variability in the urban heat
Celik B, Kaya S, Alganci U, Seker DZ (2019) Assessment of the island. Theoret Appl Climatol 95(3–4):397–406
relationship between land use/cover changes and land surface Imran HM, Hossain A, Islam AKMS, Rahman A, Bhuiyan MAE,
temperatures: a case study of thermal remote sensing. Feb-Fre- Paul S, Alam A (2021a) Impact of land cover changes on land
senius Environ Bull 3:541 surface temperature and human thermal comfort in Dhaka City
Chander G, Markham BL, Helder DL (2009) Summary of current radi- of Bangladesh. Earth Syst Environ. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​
ometric calibration coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and s41748-​021-​00243-4
EO-1 ALI sensors. Remote Sens Environ 113(5):893–903 Imran HM, Hossain A, Islam AKMS, Rahman A, Bhuiyan MABE,
Chaudhuri G, Mishra NB (2016) Spatio-temporal dynamics of land Paul S, Alam A (2021b) Impact of land cover changes on land
cover and land surface temperature in Ganges-Brahmaputra delta: surface temperature and human thermal comfort in Dhaka City
a comparative analysis between India and Bangladesh. Appl of Bangladesh. Earth Syst Environ 5:667–693. https://​doi.​org/​10.​
Geogr 68:68–83 1007/​s41748-​021-​00243-4
Chen X-L, Zhao H-M, Li P-X, Yin Z-Y (2006) Remote sensing image- IPCC (2014) Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working
based analysis of the relationship between urban heat island and group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental
land use/cover changes. Remote Sens Environ 104(2):133–146 panel on climate change 1454
Civco DL (1993) Artificial neural networks for land-cover classification Islam MS, Ahmed R (2011) Land use change prediction in Dhaka city
and mapping. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 7(2):173–186 using GIS aided Markov chain modeling. J Life Earth Sci 6:81–89
Congalton RG, Green K (2008) Assessing the accuracy of remotely Kafy A, Islam M, Ferdous L, Khan AR, Hossain MM (2019) Identify-
sensed data: principles and practices: CRC press ing most influential land use parameters contributing reduction
Corner RJ, Dewan AM, Chakma S (2014) Monitoring and prediction of surface water bodies in Rajshahi City, Bangladesh: a remote
of land-use and land-cover (LULC) change. In: Dhaka megacity, sensing approach. Remote Sens Land 2(2):87–95. https://​doi.​org/​
Springer, p 75–97 10.​21523/​gcj1.​18020​202
d’Entremont RP, Thomason LW (1987) Interpreting meteorological Kafy A-A, Naim MNH, Subramanyam G, Faisal A-A-, Ahmed NU,
satellite images using a color-composite technique. Bull Am Rakib AA, . . . Sattar GS (2021) Cellular automata approach in
Meteor Soc 68(7):762–768 dynamic modelling of land cover changes using RapidEye images
Dewan AM, Yamaguchi Y (2009a) Land use and land cover change in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Environ Challenges 4. https://​doi.​org/​10.​
in Greater Dhaka, Bangladesh: using remote sensing to promote 1016/j.​envc.​2021.​100084
sustainable urbanization. Appl Geogr 29(3):390–401 Khan MJU, Islam AKMS, Das MK, Mohammed K, Bala SK, Islam
Dewan AM, Yamaguchi Y (2009b) Land use and land cover change GMT (2019) Observed trends in climate extremes over Bangla-
in Greater Dhaka, Bangladesh: using remote sensing to promote desh from 1981 to 2010. Climate Res 77:45–61. https://​doi.​org/​
sustainable urbanization. Appl Geogr 29:390–401. https://d​ oi.o​ rg/​ 10.​3354/​cr015​39
10.​1016/j.​apgeog.​2008.​12.​005 Lambin EF (1999) Land-use and land-cover Change (LUCC)-imple-
Dewan AM, Yamaguchi Y, Rahman MZ (2012) Dynamics of land mentation strategy. A core project of the International Geosphere-
use/cover changes and the analysis of landscape fragmentation Biosphere programme and the international human dimensions
in Dhaka Metropolitan, Bangladesh. GeoJournal 77:315–330. programme on global environmental change
https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10708-​010-​9399-x Leya RS, Jodder PK, Rahaman KR et al (2022) Spatial variations of
Dewan A, Kiselev G, Botje D (2021a) Diurnal and seasonal trends urban heat island development in Khulna City, Bangladesh: impli-
and associated determinants of surface urban heat islands in large cations for urban planning and development. Earth Syst Environ.
Bangladesh cities. Appl Geogr 135. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​ https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s41748-​022-​00309-x
apgeog.​2021.​102533 Li J, Zhao H (2003) Detecting urban land-use and land-cover changes in
Dewan A, Kiselev G, Botje D, Mahmud GI, Bhuian MH, Hassan QK Mississauga using Landsat TM images. J Environ Inf 2(1):38–47
(2021b) Surface urban heat island intensity in five major cities of Li X, Zhou W, Ouyang Z, Xu W, Zheng H (2012) Spatial pattern of
Bangladesh: patterns, drivers and trends. Sustain Cities Soc 71. greenspace affects land surface temperature: evidence from the
https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​scs.​2021.​102926 heavily urbanized Beijing metropolitan area, China. Landscape
Ejiagha IR, Ahmed MR, Hassan QK, Dewan A, Gupta A, Rangelova E Ecol 27(6):887–898. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10980-​012-​9731-6
(2020) Use of remote sensing in comprehending the influence of Liu L, Zhang Y (2011) Urban heat island analysis using the Landsat
urban landscape’s composition and configuration on land surface TM data and ASTER data: a case study in Hong Kong. Remote
temperature at neighbourhood scale. Remote Sens 12(15). https://​ Sens 3(7):1535–1552
doi.​org/​10.​3390/​rs121​52508 Maduako ID, Yun Z, Patrick B (2016) Simulation and prediction of
Foody GM (2002) Status of land cover classification accuracy assess- land surface temperature (LST) dynamics within Ikom City in
ment. Remote Sens Environ 80(1):185–201 Nigeria using artificial neural network (ANN). J Remote Sens
Fu P, Weng Q (2018) Responses of urban heat island in Atlanta GIS 5(1):1–7
to different land-use scenarios. Theoret Appl Climatol Maimaitiyiming M, Ghulam A, Tiyip T, Pla F, Latorre-Carmona P,
133(1–2):123–135 Halik Ü, Sawut M, Caetano M (2014) Effects of green space
Good T, Giordano PA (2019) Methods for constructing a color com- spatial pattern on land surface temperature: implications for sus-
posite image. In: Google patents tainable urban planning and climate change adaptation. ISPRS
Gopal S, Woodcock C (1996) Remote sensing of forest change using J Photogramm Remote Sens 89:59–66. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​
artificial neural networks. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens isprs​jprs.​2013.​12.​010
34(2):398–404 McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation.
Grimmond SUE (2007) Urbanization and global environmental change: Bioscience 52:883890
local effects of urban warming. Geogr J 173(1):83–88 Meyer WB, Turner BL (1992) Human population growth and global
land-use/cover change. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23(1):39–61

13

Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.


Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023) 30:1428–1450 1449

Mia B, Bhattacharya R, Woobaidullah ASM (2017) Correlation and Rahman MTU, Esha EJ (2022) Prediction of land cover change based
monitoring of land surface temperature urban heat island with on CA-ANN model to assess its local impacts on Bagerhat south-
land use-land cover of Dhaka City using satellite imageries. Int J western coastal Bangladesh. Geocarto Int 37(9):2604–2626.
Res Geog 3(4):10–20. https://d​ oi.​org/​10.2​ 0431/​2454-​8685.0​ 3040​ https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​10106​049.​2020.​18316​21
02 Rouse JW, Haas RH, Schell JA, Deering DW (1973) Monitoring veg-
Mishra VN, Rai PK (2016) A remote sensing aided multi-layer etation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS (Earth Resources
perceptron-Markov chain analysis for land use and land cover Technology Satellite). Proceedings of 3rd Earth Resources
change prediction in Patna district (Bihar), India. Arab J Geosci Technology Satellite Symposium, Greenbelt, 10–14 December,
9(4):249 SP-351, 309–317
Mondal MS, Sharma N, Garg P, Kappas M (2016) Statistical inde- Santé I, García AM, Miranda D, Crecente R (2010) Cellular automata
pendence test and validation of CA Markov land use land cover models for the simulation of real-world urban processes: a review
(LULC) prediction results. Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci and analysis. Landsc Urban Plan 96(2):108–122
19(2):259–272 Scarano M, Sobrino JA (2015) On the relationship between the sky
Mortoja MG, Yigitcanlar T (2020) How does peri-urbanization view factor and the land surface temperature derived by Landsat-8
trigger climate change vulnerabilities? An investigation of the images in Bari, Italy. Int J Remote Sens 36(19–20):4820–4835
Dhaka Megacity in Bangladesh. Remote Sens 12. https://​doi.​ Shatnawi N, Abu Qdais H (2019) Mapping urban land surface tempera-
org/​10.​3390/​rs122​33938 ture using remote sensing techniques and artificial neural network
Mozumder C, Tripathi NK (2014) Geospatial scenario based mod- modelling. Int J Remote Sens 1–16
elling of urban and agricultural intrusions in Ramsar wetland Sholihah RI, Shibata S (2019) Retrieving spatial variation of land sur-
Deepor Beel in Northeast India using a multi-layer perceptron face temperature based on Landsat OLI/TIRS: a case of southern
neural network. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 32:92–104 part of Jember, Java, Indonesia. Paper presented at the IOP Con-
Mullick MRA, Nur MRM, Alam MJ, Islam KMA (2018) Observed ference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
trends in temperature and rainfall in Bangladesh using pre-whit- Story M, Congalton RG (1986) Accuracy assessment: a user’s perspec-
ening approach. Global Planet Change 172:104–113. https://​doi.​ tive. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 52(3):397–399
org/​10.​1016/j.​glopl​acha.​2018.​10.​001 Streutker DR (2003) Satellite-measured growth of the urban heat island
Myint SW, Wentz EA, Brazel AJ, Quattrochi DA (2013) The impact of Houston, Texas. Remote Sens Environ 85(3):282–289
of distinct anthropogenic and vegetation features on urban Thapa R, Murayama Y (2009) Examining spatiotemporal urbanization
warming. Landscape Ecol 28(5):959–978. https://​doi.​org/​10.​ patterns in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal: remote sensing and spatial
1007/​s10980-​013-​9868-y metrics approaches. Remote Sens 1(3):534–556
Pal S, Ziaul S (2017) Detection of land use and land cover change and Tran DX, Pla F, Latorre-Carmona P, Myint SW, Caetano M, Kieu HV
land surface temperature in English Bazar urban centre. Egypt J (2017) Characterizing the relationship between land use land
Remote Sens Space Sci 20(1):125–145. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​ cover change and land surface temperature. ISPRS J Photogramm
ejrs.​2016.​11.​003 Remote Sens 124:119–132
Parsa VA, Yavari A, Nejadi A (2016) Spatio-temporal analysis of land Trotter L, Dewan A, Robinson T (2017) Effects of rapid urbanisation on
use/land cover pattern changes in Arasbaran Biosphere Reserve: the urban thermal environment between 1990 and 2011 in Dhaka
Iran. Model Earth Syst Environ 2(4):1–13 Megacity, Bangladesh. AIMS Environ Sci 4(1):145–167. https://​
Pontius RG Jr, Millones M (2011) Death to Kappa: birth of quantity doi.​org/​10.​3934/​envir​onsci.​2017.1.​145
disagreement and allocation disagreement for accuracy assess- Ullah S, Tahir AA, Akbar TA, Hassan QK, Dewan A, Khan AJ, Khan
ment. Int J Remote Sens 32(15):4407–4429 M (2019) Remote sensing-based quantification of the relationships
Population and Housing Census 2011 (2011) Retrieved from Bangla- between land use land cover changes and surface temperature over
desh Bureau of Statistics the lower Himalayan region. Sustainability 11(19):5492
Rahman M (2016) Detection of land use/land cover changes and urban Weng Q, Lu D, Schubring J (2004) Estimation of land surface tem-
sprawl in Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia: an analysis of multi-temporal perature–vegetation abundance relationship for urban heat island
remote sensing data. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf 5(2):15 studies. Remote Sens Environ 89(4):467–483
Rahman MT, Rashed T (2015) Urban tree damage estimation using Xiong Y, Huang S, Chen F, Ye H, Wang C, Zhu C (2012) The
airborne laser scanner data and geographic information systems: impacts of rapid urbanization on the thermal environment: a
an example from 2007 Oklahoma ice storm. Urban For Urban remote sensing study of Guangzhou, South China. Remote Sens
Green 14(3):562–572 4(7):2033–2056
Rahman MM, Szabó G (2021) Impact of land use and land cover Zha Y, Gao J, Ni S (2003) Use of normalized difference built-up index
changes on urban ecosystem service value in Dhaka, Bangladesh. in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery. Int J
Land 10. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3390/​land1​00807​93 Remote Sens 24(3):583–594. https://d​ oi.o​ rg/1​ 0.1​ 080/0​ 14311​ 6030​
Rahman MT, Aldosary AS, Mortoja M (2017a) Modeling future land 4987
cover changes and their effects on the land surface temperatures in Yu X, Guo X, Wu Z (2014) Land surface temperature retrieval from
the Saudi Arabian eastern coastal city of Dammam. Land 6(2):36 Landsat 8 TIRS—comparison between radiative transfer equation-
Rahman MTU, Tabassum F, Rasheduzzaman M, Saba H, Sarkar L, based method, split window algorithm and single channel method.
Ferdous J, Uddin SZ, Islam AZMZ (2017b) Temporal dynam- Remote Sens 6(10):9829–9852
ics of land use/land cover change and its prediction using CA- Zhang X, Zhong T, Feng X, Wang K (2009) Estimation of the relation-
ANN model for southwestern coastal Bangladesh. Environ Monit ship between vegetation patches and urban land surface tempera-
Assess 189(11):565. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10661-​017-​6272-0 ture with remote sensing. Int J Remote Sens 30(8):2105–2118.
Rahman MS, Mohiuddin H, Kafy A-A, Sheel PK, Di L (2018) Clas- https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​01431​16080​25492​52
sification of cities in Bangladesh based on remote sensing derived Zheng B, Myint SW, Fan C (2014) Spatial configuration of anthropo-
spatial characteristics. J Urban Manag genic land cover impacts on urban warming. Landsc Urban Plan
Rahman MM, Avtar R, Yunus AP, Dou J, Misra P, Takeuchi W, Kur- 130:104–111. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​landu​rbplan.​2014.​07.​001
niawan SCTA (2020) Monitoring effect of spatial growth on land Zheng HW, Shen GQ, Wang H, Hong J (2015) Simulating land use
surface temperature in Dhaka. Remote Sens 12. https://​doi.​org/​ change in urban renewal areas: a case study in Hong Kong. Habi-
10.​3390/​rs120​71191 tat Int 46:23–34

13

Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.


1450 Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023) 30:1428–1450

Zheng Z, Zhou W, Yan J, Qian Y, Wang J, Li W (2019) The higher, surface temperature in urban landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan
the cooler? Effects of building height on land surface tempera- 102(1):54–63
tures in residential areas of Beijing. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C Zine El Abidine EM, Mohieldeen YE, Mohamed AA, Modawi O, Al-
110:149–156 Sulaiti MH (2014) Heat wave hazard modelling: Qatar case study.
Zhi-hao Q, Wen-juan L, Ming-hua Z, Karnieli A, Berliner P (2011) QScience Connect 9
Estimating of the essential atmospheric parameters of mono-win-
dow algorithm for land surface temperature retrieval from Landsat Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to
TM 6. Remote Sens Land Resour 15(2):37–43 jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Zhou W, Huang G, Cadenasso ML (2011) Does spatial configuration
matter? Understanding the effects of land cover pattern on land

13

Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.


Terms and Conditions
Springer Nature journal content, brought to you courtesy of Springer Nature Customer Service Center GmbH (“Springer Nature”).
Springer Nature supports a reasonable amount of sharing of research papers by authors, subscribers and authorised users (“Users”), for small-
scale personal, non-commercial use provided that all copyright, trade and service marks and other proprietary notices are maintained. By
accessing, sharing, receiving or otherwise using the Springer Nature journal content you agree to these terms of use (“Terms”). For these
purposes, Springer Nature considers academic use (by researchers and students) to be non-commercial.
These Terms are supplementary and will apply in addition to any applicable website terms and conditions, a relevant site licence or a personal
subscription. These Terms will prevail over any conflict or ambiguity with regards to the relevant terms, a site licence or a personal subscription
(to the extent of the conflict or ambiguity only). For Creative Commons-licensed articles, the terms of the Creative Commons license used will
apply.
We collect and use personal data to provide access to the Springer Nature journal content. We may also use these personal data internally within
ResearchGate and Springer Nature and as agreed share it, in an anonymised way, for purposes of tracking, analysis and reporting. We will not
otherwise disclose your personal data outside the ResearchGate or the Springer Nature group of companies unless we have your permission as
detailed in the Privacy Policy.
While Users may use the Springer Nature journal content for small scale, personal non-commercial use, it is important to note that Users may
not:

1. use such content for the purpose of providing other users with access on a regular or large scale basis or as a means to circumvent access
control;
2. use such content where to do so would be considered a criminal or statutory offence in any jurisdiction, or gives rise to civil liability, or is
otherwise unlawful;
3. falsely or misleadingly imply or suggest endorsement, approval , sponsorship, or association unless explicitly agreed to by Springer Nature in
writing;
4. use bots or other automated methods to access the content or redirect messages
5. override any security feature or exclusionary protocol; or
6. share the content in order to create substitute for Springer Nature products or services or a systematic database of Springer Nature journal
content.
In line with the restriction against commercial use, Springer Nature does not permit the creation of a product or service that creates revenue,
royalties, rent or income from our content or its inclusion as part of a paid for service or for other commercial gain. Springer Nature journal
content cannot be used for inter-library loans and librarians may not upload Springer Nature journal content on a large scale into their, or any
other, institutional repository.
These terms of use are reviewed regularly and may be amended at any time. Springer Nature is not obligated to publish any information or
content on this website and may remove it or features or functionality at our sole discretion, at any time with or without notice. Springer Nature
may revoke this licence to you at any time and remove access to any copies of the Springer Nature journal content which have been saved.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Springer Nature makes no warranties, representations or guarantees to Users, either express or implied
with respect to the Springer nature journal content and all parties disclaim and waive any implied warranties or warranties imposed by law,
including merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose.
Please note that these rights do not automatically extend to content, data or other material published by Springer Nature that may be licensed
from third parties.
If you would like to use or distribute our Springer Nature journal content to a wider audience or on a regular basis or in any other manner not
expressly permitted by these Terms, please contact Springer Nature at

onlineservice@springernature.com

You might also like