Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Concert Photography Tips
Concert Photography Tips
Concert Photography Tips
• Beginner Photography
Concert Photography Tips • Landscape Photography
• Wildlife Photography
BY JOE DEL TUFO | 33 COMMENTS
LAST UPDATED ON JUNE 8, 2015 • Portraiture
• Post-Processing
• Advanced Tutorials
I was recently asked how many concerts I’ve photographed, and realized that it is
coming up on thousand in the last 15 years. Any given week you can find me
VISUALIZE
shooting anything from a 20 person house concert to The Who in a 30,000 seat
arena, and anywhere in between. Tonight, it will be an up-and-coming band
called The Spring Standards, who I’ve shot 7 times in the past. They are a
dynamic, high-energy band with a lot of emotion, character and flying hair to
capture.
Yourself as a
Photography Life Member
REVIEWS
• Camera Reviews
• Lens Reviews
• Other Gear Reviews
• Best Cameras and Lenses
Typically, my concert kit is pretty straightforward. I shoot Nikon and have moved
from D70 > D200 > D700 > D3s > D810. All of these have served me well for
PHOTOGRAPHY LANDSCAPE
concert photography, but ideally you want something that gives you a relatively
BASICS PHOTOGRAPHY
clean ISO 1600, at the very least. My standard lens choices are the 24-70 f/2.8,
the 70-200 f/2.8 and I generally toss a 16mm fisheye in the mix if I know I’ll be in
the pit or close to the stage. Tonight, I am planning to mix it up a little, maybe
ditch the 24-70 for a wide prime, and see how this new D750 likes being pushed.
WILDLIFE MACRO
I am interested to see if it is clean at 6400 and what a little more shutter speed
PHOTOGRAPHY PHOTOGRAPHY
can do for this lively band. The D810 has been wonderful, but 36mp makes for a
long edit the next morning, and there’s really not a lot of cropping I do for concert
photography.
STREET PHOTOGRAPHY
PHOTOGRAPHY VIDEOS
Roger Waters
NIKON D3S + 70-200mm f/2.8 @ 100mm, ISO 3200, 1/200, f/4.0 UNIQUE GIFT IDEAS
Like a lot of photographers, I am a control freak. I don’t like the idea of letting the
camera think for me, so I shoot all concerts (and almost everything else) in
manual exposure. The downside of this is that in some arena shows, when the
light is shifting as much as 8-9 stops very quickly, it can be impossible to adjust
as quickly as the light does. I accept this limitation and usually find myself timing
shots in those cases. And sometimes blowing an exposure can reveal a lucky
surprise. It has taken me a long time to be able to look at light and mentally
calculate the exposure I want, but that’s how I do it these days. I am generally at
f/2.8 ISO 3200 and whatever shutter speed completes that exposure. I also set
my white balance manually depending on the venue. This helps with both mixed
lighting and shifting colors, which confuse some AWB algorithms. The venue I
am shooting at tonight is always 3750K. Knowing this saves me a lot of time in
SUBSCRIBE VIA EMAIL
post.
If you like our content, you can subscribe to our
newsletter to receive weekly email updates using
the link below:
As a lover of music, it was a challenge at first to enjoy a show while shooting it,
as I was constantly focusing on settings and composition, and effectively
blocking out the music. It was at the Clifford Brown Jazz Festival years ago that
something clicked. Something about seeing the communication that was
happening between band members that made me realize I was missing
something. Any more it’s difficult for me to enjoy a concert without shooting it, I
am still looking for those little communications, the expressions that help
illustrate something that cannot be heard, and mentally calculating exposures as
they shift. For me, shooting a show creates a much deeper listening. These days,
I can sense a lot of things before they come, the leaps and hair flips, the launch
into the crowd, the moment when a performer sees the camera and is, for just a
second, performing only for it. Learning to anticipate a high-energy shot is much
like tracking a bird in flight. You start to get a sense of what is going to happen,
and react accordingly.
Keith Emerson
NIKON D200 @ 98mm, ISO 500, 1/200, f/2.8
I like to shoot single point AF-C for speed. I focus using the rear AF-ON button
(see section 3.3 in the focus and recompose technique article on how to
configure this), keeping it decoupled from the shutter button. It’s fast, accurate
and at this point second nature. I like to get as much right in the camera as
possible, and have less to edit later. Processing-wise, I typically try to edit to
what I saw, adding only a gentle s-curve, slight push in the shadows (depending
on the camera body), and whatever exposure adjustment is needed. I edit in
Lightroom and a typical show will take 60-90 minutes to complete. A 3-day
music festival is another matter entirely, and a big part of why I am hoping this
D750 can unseat the D810.
Nick Cave
NIKON D800 + 70-200mm f/2.8 @ 200mm, ISO 3200, 1/200, f/2.8
There is always something interesting to reveal. You might not like the music, the
artist may have zero stage presence, the lighting might be terrible or nonexistent.
Those are often the times you discover your best work. Frankly, those are the
things that have kept me interested after 1000 shows. John Curley of the The
Afghan Whigs once said to me that “they just wanted to keep it challenging for
me” after I complained that their entire set was completely backlit. I got one of
my favorite shots at that show, a double exposure from the balcony. So keeping it
interesting makes for more interesting shots. When I get bored I move to the
fisheye, or a double exposure, or shoot an entire show with only a 105mm macro
lens to see what happens. I also shoot from the crowd if the energy is there, or
behind or above the band when that is an option.
Trombone Shorty
NIKON D3S @ 85mm, ISO 6400, 1/80, f/1.8
I’ve been lucky enough to have labels and artists send me to a number of
countries to shoot big shows, and gotten to spend time with and photograph
artists who I admire. Getting to play a small part in a larger creative process is
something that drives me to keep my work interesting.
There are a number of portfolio shots in the Live Concert section of my website
as well as a deeper archive on the concert page.
RELATED ARTICLES
Post Comment
Name*
Email*
33 COMMENTS Newest
Gary Hough
May 23, 2018 12:41 pm
Hi Joe
I came across your tips page when looking for D750 and Concert photography via Google.
I’m an amateur in the UK and have just moved from crop D5300 Nikon to a D750. Your
photos are amazing. Love the Neil Peart (Rush) one on your website WOW. I have a 70mm –
200mm G2 Tamron Lens and finding it ok but getting the lighting correct has been a struggle
on some photos. Some of my photos are here:www.flickr.com/photo…arymhough/ but I’m a
bit unsure of what ISO to set with what shutter speed. Any advice would be welcome if
possible please.
0 Reply
Glyn
December 14, 2015 2:39 pm
Hello,
I have been getting more and more great photo gigs. From an industry perspective, what are
the norms that bands will pay for a tour photographer?
Thanks!
0 Reply
Danielle
September 15, 2015 7:48 am
Ha, interestingly, when I shot Kenny Wayne Shepherd band, I didn’t know he wasn’t the
singer either – I don’t think I knew til just now when I read it! oops!
Great article
0 Reply
Keith
January 11, 2015 7:39 am
Question to those of you who take photo gear to concerts… I saw a comment, on the “pain of
taking gear…” It’s been a long time since I went to a live show (at the Garden coming up for
Fleetwood Mac)… I was thinking of taking a D610 and monopod (70-300mm too) … Question
is… Given today’s venue security is it crazy to try to take the gear? I assume I’ll have to get it
inspected in some way… Decent seats on 1st tier above the floor, so it may be worth it…
Thanks for input
0 Reply
Keith- depends on the venue, but I’d leave the monopod at home either way.
0 Reply
Sebastian
January 9, 2015 9:20 am
Stunning photos! I really admire your work. Also, you described your aproach to photography
very candidly, which is worth a great deal to me. Your photos speak for themselves, even
without additional info but its nice to catch a few pointers how it can be done. Well done. I
will wait for more your articles.
0 Reply
Thanks, Sebastian! I’m thinking about another article that will hopefully also be useful.
0 Reply
norrik
January 6, 2015 12:00 pm
Thank you for this review, very precious. And great shots!
1) The difference of resolution and IQ between the D750 and D810 is appreciable in the real
world?
2) Based on your experience, is really high the difference of the shutter noise?
3) The d750 at high iso looks impressive, what do you think of d810 in low light conditions?
Thanks again!
All my best
0 Reply
1. Only if you find the need to crop. I am going D750 unless I know they are making me
shoot from the sound booth. 2. Yes, the D810 is very soft, the D750 much less so. I’d use
the D810 in classical or other situations where I might be a distraction. 3. Not a big
difference in RAW, as far as I can tell. They are both impressive. 4. Again, they are both
exceptional in low light. It’s hard for me to know whether I am impressed by the D750
because I am expecting to be, or whether they are just both excellent.
0 Reply
Stephen
January 1, 2015 6:28 am
Thanks for the wonderful article as well as the entire site. I just stumbled upon it. I shot some
big bands on film in the ’80s, but haven’t in quite a while as I’ve been overseas and haven’t
been to any show in ages. I am now trying to decide on which dslr to get, the Nikon DF or the
D750. Tough choice. Any ideas? Thank you, Stephen. Sbazell@yahoo.com
0 Reply
I think they would be outstanding concert cameras and likely way more than anyone
needs to shoot a show. But the D750 in my opinion is such a flexible camera and its
advantages (resolution, speed, price, handling) far outweigh the slight improvement you
get in sensitivity from the DF. And for what it’s worth, I’ve seen none of the flare issues in
concert lighting with my D750.
0 Reply
Mike Banks
December 30, 2014 8:00 am
Joe, very nice work but then you have been at this genre for quite a time. What I find most
interesting is the utilization of some equipment often called by many as enthusiast cameras.
The new D750 is one of these. I think your article is not only informative including some great
photographs for us but a lesson that it is never the equipment but the photographer who
makes the shot. I think everyone reading this article should take note that this photographer
has used most of the better Nikon bodies available. Having just acquired the D750 I’m
learning what am amazing camera this “enthusiast” camera is. For my professional work I
don’t feel I need to upgrade my D800e to the D810 as I only use the 800e sparingly.
0 Reply
My pleasure, Mike!
0 Reply
heilung
December 29, 2014 5:19 pm
0 Reply
Joshua Chang
December 29, 2014 9:01 am
Hey Joe. Great work. I find this to be very difficult, especially what you are saying about
changing lighting conditions. I have shot a couple of shows as well, and while my clients say
they enjoy my work, I feel there is a lot I can do to improve. especially when it comes to
unflattering color casts. I try to time my shots as well to snap when the colors are better, but
sometime the entire ambient color cast of the entire show is one that it either too high in
contrast or is simply unflattering. do you have any in camera/shooting tips as well as post
tips that you utilize?
0 Reply
Joshua- make sure you are using a lens hood in strong concert lighting. Make sure your
white balance is set properly to start. When processing I typically do very little- but the
most important element is an effective tone curve can make all the difference. A gentle
S-curve (slight push up in the highlights and down in the shadows) is a good place to
start. And there is always room to improve, I certainly hope!
0 Reply