Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IMMI Refusal Notification with Decision Record Kamal Kumar (1)
IMMI Refusal Notification with Decision Record Kamal Kumar (1)
Kumar KAMAL
vpo rasina
kaithal HARYANA 136042
INDIA
In reply quote:
Client name Kumar KAMAL
Date of birth 05 June 1996
Date of visa application 16 September 2023
Application ID 1685673163
Transaction reference number EGOZFRO9G6
File number BCC2023/5339342
Visa application charge receipt number 9028336539
Notification of refusal of application for a Visitor (class FA) Visitor (Tourist) (subclass
600) visa
Refused applicant
I wish to advise you that the application for this visa has been refused on 22 September 2023
for the following applicant:
The applicant did not satisfy the provisions of the Migration Regulations 1994.
The attached decision record provides detailed information about this decision as it applies to
this applicant.
Review rights
There is no right of merits review for this decision.
Yours sincerely
Aanchal
Position number: 60066823
Department of Home Affairs
Application details
Visa class Visitor (class FA) Visitor (Tourist) (subclass
600)
Stream (main applicant only) Tourist
Date of visa application 16 September 2023
Transaction reference number EGOZFRO9G6
Application ID 1685673163
File number BCC2023/5339342
Visa application charge receipt number 9028336539
Findings
On the basis of all the information available to me, including the documents and information
the applicant provided, I find that the criteria for the grant of a Visitor (Tourist) visa in the
Tourist stream are not satisfied.
Reasons
I have assessed the application and the reasons for my decision are detailed below.
An application for a Visitor (Tourist) visa in the Tourist stream has been made by the
applicant.
A visa cannot be granted unless the relevant criteria specified in the Migration Act and the
Migration Regulations are satisfied.
In this case, I am not satisfied that clause 600.211 in Schedule 2 of the Migration
Regulations is satisfied. This clause provides that:
600.211
The applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose for which the visa is
granted, having regard to:
(a) whether the applicant has complied substantially with the conditions to which the last
substantive visa, or any subsequent bridging visa, held by the applicant was subject; and
(b) whether the applicant intends to comply with the conditions to which the Subclass 600
visa would be subject; and
(c) any other relevant matter.
Under policy when considering “any other relevant matter”, decision makers may take
into account a wide range of considerations to determine whether an applicant genuinely
intends a temporary stay in Australia. This may include, but is not limited to, the applicant’s
employment, economic and family circumstances, their credibility, the claimed purpose and
period of stay, and the applicant’s previous travel history.
In assessing these criteria, I have taken into account the information provided by the
applicant in their visa application form and the supporting documents. I find that the
information provided is not sufficient to satisfy me of their genuine temporary stay intention,
and the applicant has not demonstrated that they have sufficiently strong commitments in
home country that would be an incentive for them to return.
The applicant claims to be self-employed and they have provided evidence of their self-
employment and income along with financial and other supporting documents.
More specifically, I have considered their economic circumstances and find that their
claimed self-employment cannot be considered significant in the context of overall economic
conditions in their residing country. As such, it cannot be considered a strong incentive to
return to India at the end of their proposed stay in Australia.
After considering the information provided, I am not satisfied that the applicant genuinely
intends to stay temporarily in Australia for the purposes set out above.
Therefore, I am not satisfied that the applicant meets the relevant criteria in clause 600.211
in Schedule 2 of the Migration Regulations.
Decision
As clause 600.211 is not satisfied, I find the criteria for the grant of a Visitor (Tourist) visa in
the Tourist stream are not satisfied. Therefore, I refuse the application by the applicant for a
Visitor (Tourist) visa in the Tourist stream.
Yours sincerely
Aanchal
Position Number: 60066823
Department of Home Affairs
13 OCTOBER 2023