STUDENT NAME: TRAN TAM NHU

STUDENT ID: 23510800014

SUBJECT: ESP for Interior Design
ASSIGNMENT: Final Writing
TUTOR: Pham Thi Kim Yen
DATE: Tuesday, 14th May 2024
Due: Tuesday, 21st May 2024, at 13:00

FINAL WRITING
The author's study and discussion with Martin C. Pedersen illustrate the essential issue of friction
between architecture and science. The teaching paradigms at architectural schools, notably in the
United States, place a greater focus on art and theory than on scientific inquiry and evidence-based
design, which contributes to architecture's resistance to scientific integration. This discrepancy has far-
reaching consequences for the design of constructed settings, particularly when addressing the
requirements of people with perceptual and cognitive disorders (PCD).

Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a rare, inherited, condition that affects several organs and gets worse
over time. It affects approximately 1 in every 10,000 to 30,000 people. People with PCD have a problem
with mucus build-up, which leads to inflammation in the airways and infections in the lungs, nose,
sinuses and ears. The expansion of research into various disabilities, including ADHD, PTSD, sensory
processing disorder, blindness, and deafness, reveals that a significant portion of building occupants fall
within the PCD category. However, the lack of comprehensive data and integration across disability
groups means that architectural design often fails to meet the needs of these populations.

The author's work on multimodal design standards for aging, dementia, and autism demonstrates the
potential advantages of incorporating scientific research into architectural practice. The Cottages, a
dementia care facility and autism clinic in Woodbury, Minnesota, demonstrate how evidence-based
design may greatly enhance patients' quality of life.
 https://www.archdaily.com/364518/the-architect-and-the-accessible-city-the-prize-winning-essay

Many architects are concerned that designing for impairments may detract from the aesthetic and
practical aspects sought by neurotypical persons. However, the author claims that this inclusive design
philosophy reflects the preferences of both disabled and nondisabled people, implying that meeting PCD
requirements can result in universally appealing places. Accessibility should be seen as an essential
aspect of architectural design, enhancing the usability and usability of buildings for everyone.
Incorporating disability design features into disability-based buildings not only ensures equitable access
for people with disabilities but also benefits everyone by promoting inclusivity and diversity in public
spaces.

A perceptive analysis of environmental design that emphasizes the effects that sensory problems have
on people with disabilities and those without. The author dispels the myth that people with disabilities
are predominantly affected by sensory complaints. This viewpoint advocates for spaces that are
comfortable and widely accessible, calls on designers to take into account the wide range of sensory
experiences, and challenges our understanding of and responses to sensory complaints.

Designing for disability groups requires a nuanced approach because disabilities vary widely, and what
works for one group might not work for another. It's important to prioritize inclusivity and accessibility
by considering diverse needs and preferences within the disabled community. Engaging with various
disability groups for feedback and incorporating universal design principles can help create solutions
that cater to a broader range of users.
 Village centre of Meilen, Zurich, Switzerland
https://www.studiovulkan.ch/en/project/town-hall-square-meilen/

The author's results question various architectural beliefs. Firstly, outstanding structures do not have to
be more expensive; they require staff experienced in scientific research and design. Second, designing
for disability does not penalize nondisabled people, because both groups frequently have comparable
sensory and cognitive preferences. This convergence implies that inclusive design may improve the
overall user experience while maintaining quality and functionality.

The culmination of the research highlights the need for a paradigm shift in architectural practice.
Current disability design standards, such as those set by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA),
primarily address physical accessibility, neglecting the sensory and cognitive aspects critical to PCD
populations. Such standards would not only improve conditions for those with disabilities but also
create more peaceful and enjoyable environments for all users.
 Vandhalla” Egmont Rehabilitation Centre
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Vandhalla-Egmont-Rehabilitation-Centre-a-Outdoor-view-b-View-of-pool-for-disabled

Design for disabilities often focuses on physical accessibility standards like ADA because they are legally
mandated and widely recognized. However, incorporating multi-sensory design standards can enhance
inclusivity further by addressing a broader range of needs, including sensory, cognitive, and
neurodiverse considerations.
 https://www.createursdinterieur.com/en/disability-friendly-interior-design/

Interior design for special needs can indeed achieve both functional and aesthetic purposes. For
example, using contrasting colors and textures can aid individuals with visual impairments while also
creating visually stimulating and attractive spaces. Additionally, incorporating adjustable furniture and
adaptable layouts can cater to various mobility needs while maintaining a pleasing aesthetic.

The ratio between public buildings for disabled and non-disabled individuals can vary depending on
factors such as location, regulations, and social priorities. It typically reflects efforts to ensure
accessibility and inclusivity in public spaces, aiming to accommodate the needs of all members of the
community. Specific data analysis or research would be needed to determine the exact ratio in a given
area or context.

In conclusion, the integration of scientific research into architectural practice is essential for creating
inclusive and effective built environments. The resistance to this integration stems from educational
deficiencies and misconceptions about the impact of disability design. By embracing evidence-based
design principles and expanding our understanding of PCD, architects can create spaces that enhance
the well-being and quality of life for all individuals, demonstrating that good design is inherently
inclusive.
References
https://www.archdaily.com/984212/when-it-comes-to-design-for-the-disabled-let-the-science-lead-the-process

https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/primary-ciliary-dyskinesia

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290496980_Universal_design_in_housing_for_people_with_disabilities_A_review

https://careerfoundry.com/en/blog/ux-design/the-importance-of-usability-and-accessibility-in-design/

https://www.jchs.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/connery_disabilityhousing_april2016_v2.pdf

https://www.arch2o.com/architecture-design-disabled

https://www.archdaily.com/364518/the-architect-and-the-accessible-city-the-prize-winning-essay