Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Badger Rails: Web Extra Edition State Rail Summit Explores Michigan Successes
Badger Rails: Web Extra Edition State Rail Summit Explores Michigan Successes
Badger Rails: Web Extra Edition State Rail Summit Explores Michigan Successes
weekly conference calls for several months, and the action that had taken place in Michigan with the citizen forums was known to various coalition members. The Wisconsin coalition decided to hold a rail summit, and invite interested people and see if such an idea might also work in Wisconsin. Thus came about the July 28 Rail Summit. The Kickoff and Goals Nona Hill, ProRail president, opened the session by thanking the 17 sponsoring organizations. She reiterated these groups are not just the traditional
citizen desires regarding rail passenger service. Meetings would not be DOT led or organized although DOT was welcome to attend. Coincidentally the process began during run-up to statewide election campaigns. Michigan has a strict term limits law. The sitting governor could not succeed herself, and several legislators in both houses were also facing term limits, so regardless of political party affiliation or leanings, there were going to be changes in individual office holders. This major turn over in state elected officials was not one of the original considerations in planning the citizen forums, but it turned out the forum process, occurring during the election campaign, generated more interest, and perhaps influenced some of the election results. About 6 months of planning preceded the first meeting. After the first two meetings word had spread, and other communities asked to be included as meeting locations. Eventually 16 meetings were held in the Lower Peninsula. Most were in on-line cities served currently by Amtrak, but some were purposely held in off-line locations. An attempt was made to hold the meetings in different state legislative districts. The citizen group wanted positive media stories. They kept a positive public relations flow before the meetings began to be held. The meetings were non-political, and were controlled to insure they did not become a bashing of perceived anti-rail politicians, or taken over by anti-rail groups. (Authors note: Considering the unique volatility now in Wisconsin politics, this politically neutral stance is very important to maintain if similar Wisconsin forums are to retain their credibility). State and federal elected officials were sought to sponsor each of the meetings, especially in their own district. The Michigan Municipal League was asked to co-sponsor each meeting and they did by sending notices to all their member municipalities. This lent credibility to the process. State and federal and local city/village/township elected officials were generally receptive to the idea of citizen forums. County supervisor support varied, Continued on page 3
Realtors were one of the groups that took an interest in rail service to their community. Groups representing disabled persons and generalist environmental groups also were strong supporters of expanded rail passenger service. Format and Conduct of the Meetings The rail coalition kept it clear that it was a citizen forum and while state agencies were welcome at the meetings it was made clear they would not dominate the proceedings. The meetings were announced as being two hours long and were held in the evenings from 6 to 8 p.m. The venues ranged from churches to village halls and the room was set to accommodate 6 to 8 people around a table, with as many tables as could be accommodated. Most of the meeting venues were offered free of charge. Both on line cities with current Amtrak service as well as those communities with no current service, and perhaps located such that service may never be likely, were hosts to the meetings. It was agreed there would be no meetings actually held in the Upper Peninsula, but as it turned out many Lower Peninsula residents had strong positive feelings about rail service to this other part of their state. People attending the meetings were literally off the street interested citizens, and most had no affiliation with rail advocacy or other environmental groups in that they usually didnt know each other until they came to the meeting. As they began talking to each other they found they did have in common a desire for better rail passenger service. The participants were given blank maps of Michigan with county outlines, but no road or railroad routes shown. They were asked to place a sticky dot at their current residence and then to put dots at the various places to which they either regularly travel, or would like to go, for whatever reason, in the state. The reasons might be where they attend college, where they vacation, where relatives livewhatever reason it is important for them to travel to that other place. It was stressed by the organizers that this exercise has nothing to do with finances it is just to build a case as to where Continued on page 4
the meeting. No such outbreaks occurred at the rail passenger forums, although there were skeptics. Open discussion was encouraged at all of the meetings. One U.S. Congressman, known for his conservative Republican views was won over since his district is served by all three existing Michigan Amtrak routes, and his endorsement of the planning meetings helped blunt conservative knee-jerk anti rail/anti-subsidy backlash. A unique experience was had at the Traverse City meeting. Traverse City is not currently served by Amtrak, but the owner of a local short line railroad, Great Lakes Central, offered train rides from Boyne Mountain to the meeting site at Traverse City. This may have been the first time some of the attendees had actually ridden a train. This offer helped win support for participation in the forum, and opened some possibilities of thinking outside the box. This ability to be freed from conventional bureaucratic thought was one of the main advantages of the citizen forums as opposed to the traditional constrained thinking of the MiDOT planners who for example, wouldnt propose rail service on a branch line to nowhere or even where there currently are no tracks! Questions and Answers Several questions from the Wisconsin forum audience revolved around the role of the media in both promoting the forums initially, and then in covering the results after the sessions. The Michigan speakers said the coalition had established both a webpage and a Facebook presence. The web site cost $30 a year and is well worth it although they are not sure of the value of Facebook. All the media notices are also posted on the web site and sent to legislators. They stressed the desirability to build a relationship with the local media, including the rural shoppers. These instruments are sometimes read more than a big city mind set may realize and a gem of hard news amongst the used tractor and hay for sale ads can go a long way in a rural area. They also said cultivating the Continued on page 5
Some of the Forums evolved into discussion of rail freight service. As long as the discussion doesnt go too far astray this is ok as integrated service is the economic driver of most rail improvement decisions. The Traverse City example of a rail freight short line operator welcoming rail passenger service to gain track improvements is part of the cooperation needed in the real world. Allow the forum discussion to broaden into areas such as commuter rail, connecting motor coach, and mass transit, as all of these modes help strengthen the city to city passenger rail mode if properly integrated into a system. General discussion comments pointed out since Gov. Walker turned back the High Speed rail money, there has been no further mention of the Federal Rail Administration (FRA) mandated plan by Wisconsin DOT. No one at WisDOT will comment on the status of the plan. The Michigan speakers pointed out that initially the MiDOT didnt want to cooperate with the citizen forums, but eventually the state rail plan incorporated portions of the rail coalition-developed Michigan By Rail plan into the state plan, and now MiDOT is working closely with the coalition. The current governor, although a Republican, supports passenger rail and was publicized standing next to the Obama administrations DOT Secretary LaHood accepting additional rail money received from Wisconsins and Floridas turn-back of their funds. The emphasis needs to be on those who are pro rail and those who are anti rail, not Democrat or Republican. It is interesting that the Michigan governor ran on a Five Point ticket. The first point was Create jobs and the fifth point was Help communities. Passenger rail does both of these things well. Additional Observations The two speakers commented on what surprises came up at the meetings and whether feelings differed from south to north through the state. At the Traverse City forum, in the northwest corner of the Lower Peninsula it was recognized tourism is an important part of the economy, and the area is Continued on page 6
prepared to change tactics at future forums. Get a press release out now. There is a larger group out in the state seeking the truth about the rail issue. They dont believe its a boondoggle, but must see reassurance from some group willing to stand up and tell the truth. Mike McCoy People take trains first and foremost because they want to go someplace. The Milwaukee-Madison improvement, which seemed so logical to a person looking at the whole picture, was turned into a political rallying point by the nay-sayers. By gaining access to the nations rail passenger system, Madison residents would not have just gained access to Milwaukee. They would have gained access to literally 1,000 places on the continents rail passenger system. This is the message that must be gotten across. He urged everyone to participate in the bi-weekly rail coalition conference phone calls. Gary Goyke Gary is lobbyist for several environmental groups. He took issue with an earlier statement regarding the difference in Michigans and Wisconsins election cycles. He stated Wisconsin will be in a continual election cycle for the next several months through 2012. He urged the coalition to try to get as many forums done as possible into the Fall of 2011.
Badger Rails is published 6 times per year by the Wisconsin Association of Railroad Passengers, a not-for-profit Wisconsin membership association. WisARP President is John Parkyn, Stoddard, WI, (608)788-7004, email: jdp@dairynet.com Badger Rails Editor is Jim Sponholz. Please send comments or news items to: badgerrails@gmail.com Please send membership renewals ($15 per year) and address changes to: Mark Weitenbeck, 3385 S. 119th Street, West Allis, WI 53227 email: weitenbeck@sbcglobal.net WisARP on the Web: www.wisarp.org
JOIN US!
Wereworkingformore andbetterrailservice
FirstYearDuesarejust$10
___________________________________________ __________________________________________ Name EmailAddress ________________________________________________________________________ MailingAddress ______________________________________________________________________________________ City State ZIP Phone