Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hove, E. (2023). the Importance of Literature Review in Educational Research. GZU_103748
Hove, E. (2023). the Importance of Literature Review in Educational Research. GZU_103748
Hove, E. (2023). the Importance of Literature Review in Educational Research. GZU_103748
SCHOOL OF
EDUCATION AND
CULTURE
LEVEL: 2:1
LECTURER: DR MUDZANIRE
MARK:
COMMENT:
Rettberg (2019) suggest that, literature is a method of recording, preserving, and transmitting
knowledge and entertainment, and can also have a social, psychological, spiritual, or political
role. Literature is a form of human expression, but not everything expressed in words even when
organized and written down is counted as literature.
Macmillan and Schumacher (1997) submit that, literature review is the comprehensive study and
interpretation of literature that relates to a particular topic. Aveyard (2010) attests to this by
saying that literature review is a comprehensive summary of previous research on a topic. Based
on the views of Macmillan, Schumacher and Aveyard literature review can be understood as
reviewing of the previous written or scholarly work in trying to relate such information to a
certain current research topic.
Educational research can then be viewed as ‘the collection and analysis of information on the
world of education so as to understand and explain it better. With a significance for practicing
teachers in that it should be viewed as a critical, reflexive, and professionally orientated
activity ... regarded as a crucial ingredient in the teacher’s professional role, generating self-
knowledge and personal development in such a way that practice can be improved. (Yates, 2004)
To start with, identification of research gaps is one amongst the importance of reviewing
literature in educational research. Reviewing already existed literature enables researchers to take
note of gaps in knowledge and understanding within their chosen field of study (Ridley, 2008).
Given that, the researcher come up with a research topic which reads “The efficacy of field work
in the teaching and learning of History.” A researcher may notice that, the previous written work
of various scholars was focused on Masvingo urban, Harare urban, Mash West and Triangle case
studies. The researcher may choose to carry out his or her study in areas which has not yet been
touched such as Kwekwe urban thus gap identification and filling. Identifying of unanswered
questions, conflicting findings or areas that require further investigation is done through
examining previous writings. For example, the researcher may find out that the previous writings
have just asked the views of learners and teachers only to determine the efficacy of fieldwork in
teaching and learning of History. Through these findings a researcher may want to know the
views of parents, School Development Committee and Headmasters thus the identification of
questions yet to get answers. This process is critical for guiding the research design and focus on
addressing relevant and significant gaps in the existing body of knowledge so literature review is
very important.
Connecting to the above paragraph, the goal of review of literature in educational research is to
provide a justification of the proposed research and this can be achieved through main
objectives. The objectives involve reviewing of published literature thus to identify and
summaries relevant theories and researches. Another objective is to critique the literature
meaning the identification of arguments for and against theories, assess value of research claims,
and identify limitations in previous research (Aveyard, 2010). Also, objectively to identify gaps
in literature thus to identify the gap in knowledge and areas that have only been partially
researched. and to inform proposed research meaning to provide a rationale, background or
context for proposed research and guide selection for an appropriate design and methodology,
(Ridley, 2008).
Avoiding duplication and redundancy is another reason for reviewing literature in educational
research. A thorough literature review helps researchers avoid duplicating previous studies. A
thorough literature review in involves the application of reading, analytical, interpretation and
understanding skills on various written works (Leedy and Ormrod, 2001). Critical analysis
enables the researcher to come across all the information written by other scholars so they will be
low chances of bring the old information into your dissertation, journal, article and other written
works. By examining what has already been done, researchers can ensure that their research
questions are original and contribute something new to the field. This minimizes redundancy and
ensures that research effort is focused on advancing knowledge rather than replicating existing
study. Thus in other words, reviewing literature is important in educational research because it
ensure the originality of your work in terms of research questions and data collection,
presentation and analysis.
Providing evidence based support is also a reason behind the reviewing of literature in
educational research. Literature review gives researchers evidence based support for their
research claims and findings. By reviewing and synthesizing existing studies, researchers can
identify patterns, trends and empirical evidence that support or challenge their research
hypothesis (Hart, 1998). This strengthens the credibility and validity of their findings and helps
to establish a solid basis for arguments and conclusions. Let’s say the data gathered indicated
that literature itself is important in the teaching and learning of Shona culture. The reviewed
literature will then stand as an evidence which support the views of participants or it will show
the contradictions between participants and other scholars. Hence reviewing literature is critical
in educational research as such process provides evidence based support to the claims and
findings.
Specifically, the purpose of what we call systematic literature review is to provide as complete a
list as possible of all the published and unpublished studies relating to a particular subject area.
This shows that, all the sources of information should be acknowledged on reference. It is
different with traditional reviews that attempt to summarize results of a number of studies
(Cooper, 1998). Systematic reviews use explicit and rigorous criteria to identify, critically
evaluate and synthesize all the literature on a particular topic (Cronin, et al, 2008). Primary
purpose of literature review is to provide the reader with a comprehensive background for
understanding current knowledge and highlighting the significance of new research. It can
inspire research ideas by identifying gaps or inconsistencies in a body of knowledge. Thus,
helping the researcher to determine or define research questions or hypotheses so literature
review is important.
Literature review is also important as it can contextualize research findings by obtaining answers
for the research questions as easy in academic research. Ridley (2008) saw the challenges based
on how to examine the research findings in the existing body of knowledge? How to answer the
research questions compared to what other researchers concluded? What is the new knowledge
contribution from the research work? How are the findings distinguished from those of other
researchers? Literature review is accountable for answering all these questions so there is need to
go back to the review of literature. It is important to put the findings in the context of what is
already known and understood in the field of research interest, (Ridley, 2008). All what is
already known is acquired through reviewing literature so there is no room for underrating
literature review in educational research.
Lastly, literature review discusses published information in a particular subject area, and
sometimes information in a particular subject area within a certain time period. A literature
review of a mature topic addresses the need for a critique of, and the potential
reconceptualization of, the expanding and more diversified knowledge base of the topic as it
continues to develop. The systematic literature review addresses new topics that would benefit
from a holistic conceptualization and synthesis of the literature. The review is more likely to lead
to an initial or preliminary conceptualization of the topic like a new model or framework,
because these topics are relatively new and have not yet undergone a comprehensive review of
the literature, (Cooper, 1989). Thus to say, reviewing literature is more important in academic
research.
However, reviewing literature is done successfully done by a researcher who has the ability to
research, read, understand analyzing and interpreting. Without those skills it’s impossible to
review literature perfectly. Those skills help the researcher to keep away from plagiarism and
replication of information which has already published. In this regard, originality of educational
research is ensured by a person who possess understanding, analyzing, interpreting and
paraphrasing techniques.
Judging from above discussion, the literature review is very cardinal in educational research. In
the main discussion section, reviewing literature is having been credited for the identification of
gaps on the previous studies, identification of appropriate research methodologies and
instruments, provision of the evidence based support among others. Nevertheless, a good
literature review requires a researcher to possess analytical, interpretation and paraphrasing skills
to avert the cases of plagiarism and improve the originality of work.
REFERENCE:
Aveyard, H. (2010). Doing a Literature Review in Health and Social Care: A Practical
Guide,2nd edn. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Boote, D.N. & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation
literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher 34/6,15.
Cooper, H. (1998). Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews. Thousand Oaks,
California: Sage Publications.
Cooper, H. M. (1989). Integrating research: A guide for literature reviews (2nd ed.). Newbury
Park, Calif: Sage Publications.
Hall. G. and Ridley, D. (2008). The Literature Review: A Step-by-step Guide for Students.
London: Sage.
Hart, C. (1998). Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination.
London: Sage.
Jesson, J., Matheson, L. and Lacey, F.M. (2011). Doing your Literature Review: Traditional and
Systematic Techniques. London: Sage.
Kirby, S., Greaves, L. & Reid, C. (2006). Searching the Literature. In Experience research
social change: Methods beyond the mainstream (pp. 101-117). Peterborough, ON: Broadview
Press. Education Library.
Leedy P. D., & Ormrod J. E. (2001). Practical research: Planning and design. Merrill Prentice
Hall. Source: Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P.W. (2006). Educational
Machi, L.A. and McEvoy, B.T. (2009). The Literature Review: Six Steps to Success. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Research: Competencies for analysis and applications (8th ed.). Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice
Macmillan, J. H., naSchumacher, S. (1997). Research in Education. A Conceptual Introduction.
Glassgow: Harper and Collins.
Ridley, D. (2008). The Literature Review: A Step-by-step Guide for Students. London: Sage.
Yates, L. (2004). What Does Good Educational Research Look Like: Situating a Field and Its
Practices. Conducting Educational Research. McGraw-Hill International. IS.