Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2017_Effectsofdualversussupersingletrucktireonflexiblepavementperformance-Amechanisticapproach
2017_Effectsofdualversussupersingletrucktireonflexiblepavementperformance-Amechanisticapproach
2017_Effectsofdualversussupersingletrucktireonflexiblepavementperformance-Amechanisticapproach
net/publication/318777607
Effects of dual versus super single truck tire on flexible pavement performance;
a mechanistic approach
CITATIONS READS
4 3,871
1 author:
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Ahmad M Abu Abdo on 23 September 2017.
www.arpnjournals.com
ABSTRACT
With the widely observed premature failures of flexible pavements, attentions have been directed to changes on
heavy vehicles loads, axles configurations, and tire types and pressure as a cause for such phenomenon. Super single
(wide-base) tires were introduced in early 1980s as a replacement to traditional dual tires, and considered beneficial to the
transportation industries. However, this type of tires proved to cause more damage to flexible pavements. Recently, new
generation of super single tires were developed with a promise that the damage issue was addressed. Many studies were
conducted but were in disagreements in their findings. Thus, this study was conducted. 3D Move Analysis software was
used to conduct analytical evaluation and compare both tire configurations by utilizing an existing project and actual
materials test data. Results showed that when compared to dual tires, super single tire induced less normal stresses in the
analyzed flexible pavement by 28% in the z direction, 45% in the y direction, and 47% in the x direction. Therefore and as
per the results of the analysis, super single tires would inflect less percentage of bottom up cracking in the asphalt concrete
layer and less permanent deformation in all pavement layers.
Keywords: flexible pavement, pavement performance, dual truck tires, super single tire, mechanistic approach, 3D move analysis.
4136
VOL. 12, NO. 13, JULY 2017 ISSN 1819-6608
ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
©2006-2017 Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN). All rights reserved.
www.arpnjournals.com
4137
VOL. 12, NO. 13, JULY 2017 ISSN 1819-6608
ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
©2006-2017 Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN). All rights reserved.
www.arpnjournals.com
dual tires. On the other hand, the shear stress in x-y direction inflected by the super single
tire was higher by 161%, but equal in the other directions. by super single tire is less than dual tires. Furthermore, the
Figure-4 illustrates the normal stress in z, y, and x duration of the induced stresses in the pavement is less for
directions vs. loading time for dual tires and super single the super single tire.
tires, it can be clearly observed that normal stresses caused
Table-1. Pavement stresses due to dual tires and super single tire loadings.
1.20E+03
Normal Stress (z direction), kPa
1.00E+03
8.00E+02
6.00E+02
4.00E+02
2.00E+02
0.00E+00
0.00E+00 5.00E‐02 1.00E‐01 1.50E‐01 2.00E‐01 2.50E‐01 3.00E‐01 3.50E‐01
‐2.00E+02
Time, sec
4138
VOL. 12, NO. 13, JULY 2017 ISSN 1819-6608
ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
©2006-2017 Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN). All rights reserved.
www.arpnjournals.com
2.00E+03
1.00E+03
5.00E+02
0.00E+00
0.00E+00 5.00E‐02 1.00E‐01 1.50E‐01 2.00E‐01 2.50E‐01 3.00E‐01 3.50E‐01
‐5.00E+02
‐1.00E+03
Time, sec
1.40E+03
1.20E+03
Normal Stress (y direction), kPa
1.00E+03
8.00E+02
6.00E+02
4.00E+02
2.00E+02
0.00E+00
0.00E+00 5.00E‐02 1.00E‐01 1.50E‐01 2.00E‐01 2.50E‐01 3.00E‐01 3.50E‐01
‐2.00E+02
‐4.00E+02
Time, sec
As for the predicted pavement stresses, Figure- for permanent deformation for all layers, it was found that
5shows predicted AC Bottom Up Cracking (%) of the the super tire caused less permanent deformation than dual
analyzed pavement. It was found that super single tire tires in all layers. None of the tire configuration met the
would cause less cracks than dual tires, mainly due to design limits for the AC layer. However, where the dual
lower stresses. It is interesting to observe that none of the tires failed, the super tire passed in all other pavement
tire configurations results met the design limitations. As layers, as shown in Figure-6.
60
50
AC Bottom UP Cracking (%)
40
30
20
10
0
Single Super Tire Dual Tires Acceptable Limit
4139
VOL. 12, NO. 13, JULY 2017 ISSN 1819-6608
ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
©2006-2017 Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN). All rights reserved.
www.arpnjournals.com
40
35
25
20
15
10
0
AC Layer Base Layer Subbase Layer Subgrade Layer
4140
VOL. 12, NO. 13, JULY 2017 ISSN 1819-6608
ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
©2006-2017 Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN). All rights reserved.
www.arpnjournals.com
[9] Badeli S, Muniandy R and Saliani S. 2014. Evaluating [16] Siddharthan RV, Krishnamenon N, El-Mously M, and
the Effect of the New Generation of Wide-base and Sebaaly PE. 2002. Investigation of Tire Contact Stress
Dual Tires on Pavement Rutting. Distributions on Pavement Response. Journal of
SuruhanjayaPengangkutanAwamDaratland Public Transportation Engineering, ASCE, 128(2):136-144,
Transport Symposium, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. DOI: 10.3141/1655-22.
[10] Priest AL, Timm DH, and Barrett WE. 2005. [17] Huhtala M andPihlajamaki K. 1992. New Concepts
Mechanistic Comparison of Wide-Base Single Vs. on Load Equivalency Measurements. Proceeding of
Standard Dual Tire Configurations. NCAT Report 05- 7th International Conference Asphalt Pavements,
03, NCAT, Albama, USA. Nottingham, U.K. pp. 194-208.
[11] Wang G and Roque R. 2011. Evaluation of Truck Tire [18] Al-Qadi IL and Wang H. 2009. Evaluation of
Types on Near-Surface Pavement Response Based on Pavement Damage due to New Tire Designs.
Finite Element Analysis. International Journal of Research Report ICT-09-048, Illinois Center for
Pavement Research and Technology. 4(4):203-211. Transportation, IL USA.
[12] Grellet D, Doré G, Bilodeau JP, and Gauliard T. 2013. [19] Abu Abdo AM and Jung SJ. 2016. Effects of Asphalt
Wide-Base Single-Tire and Dual-Tire Assemblies - Mix Design Properties on Pavement Performance: A
Comparison Based on Experimental Pavement Mechanistic Approach, Advances in Civil Engineers,
Response and Predicted Damage. Transportation 2016 (Article No. 9354058).
Research Record: Journal of the Transportation
Research Board, 2369:47-56, DOI: 10.3141/2369-06. [20] Abu Abdo AM, Bayomy F, Nielsen R, Weaver T,
Jung S J and Santi MJ. 2009. Prediction of the
[13] ARC. 2013. Report J: Pavement Response Model to Dynamic Modulus of Superpave Mixes. Proceedings
Dynamic Loads 3D Move. Quarterly Technical of the 8th International Conference on the Bearing
Progress Report, Asphalt Research Consortium, USA. Capacity of Roads, Railways and Airfields, USA. pp.
305-314.
[14] Siddharthan RV, Yao J and Sebaaly PE. 1998.
Pavement Strain from Moving Dynamic 3-D Load [21] De Beer M, Fisher C, and Jooste FJ. 1997.
Distribution. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Determination of Pneumatic Tire/Pavement Interface
ASCE, 124(6):557-566, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733- Contact Stresses under Moving Loads and Some
947x(1998)124:6(557). Effects on Pavements with Thin Asphalt Surfacing
Layers. Proceedings of the 8thInternational
[15] Siddharthan RV, Krishnamenon N, and Sebaaly PE. Conference on Asphalt Pavements, University of
2000. Pavement Response Evaluation using Finite- Washington, USA. pp. 179-227.
Layer Approach. Transportation Research Record:
Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
1709:43-49, DOI: 10.3141/1709-06.
4141