Program Book

Community Service Project

AP STATE COUNCIL OF HIGHER

EDUCATION
 A COMMUNITY SERVICE PROJECT REPORT

ON
“CROP ROTATION”

Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for award of the degree of

BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY
IN
ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING

Submitted by

P.Navyasree 21F21A0497

Under the esteemed guidance of

Mr. M.B. Bheema kumar M.Tech.,

Assistant Professor

DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING

GATES INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

(Approved by A.I.C.T.E, New Delhi & Affiliated to JNTUA & Accredited by NAAC-“A”) N.H-44, Gooty,
Anantapuramu (V), Anantapuramu (Dist), Gooty-515401, A.P
 COMMUNITY SERVICE PROJECT

Name of the Student : P.Navyasree

Name of the College : GATES Institute Of Technology

Registration Number : 21F21A0497

Period of CSP : From: 01/05/2023 To: 24/06/2023

Name of the Community : Crop Rotation

Address of the Habitation : Pothulanagepalle(v),Dharmavaram(m),Sri sathya

sai(dist),515651
 COMMUNITY SERVICE PROJECT REPORT

Submitted in accordance with the requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Technology

Electronics & Communication Engineering

Name of the College : Gates Institute Of Technology

Department : Electronics & Communication Engineering

Name of the Faculty Guide : Mr.M.B Bheema kumar M.Tech

Duration of the CSP : From : 01/05/2023 To: 24/06/2023

Name of the Student : P.Navyasree

Programme of Study : Crop Rotation

Year of Study : II-II Year

Register Number : 21F21A0497

Date of Submission : 26/06/2023

 STUDENT’S DECLARATION

I P.Navyasree a student of Community Service Programme Reg. No. 21F21A0497 of the Department
ofElectronics & Communication Engineering, GATES Institute of Technnology College do hereby
declare that I have completed the mandatory community service from 01/05/2023 To 24/06/2023 in
surroundings of under the Faculty Guideship Mr.M.B Bheema kumar Department of Electronics &
Communication Engineering in GATES Institute of Technology, Gooty.

Endorsements

Faculty Guide

Head of the Department

Principal
 CERTIFICATE FROM OFFICIAL OF THE COMMUNITY

This is to certify that P.Navyasree reg. no 21F21A0497 of Gates Institute Of Technology underwent
community service in surroundings of pothulanagepalle from 01/05/2023 To 24/06/2023.The overall
performanceof the community service volunteer during his/her community service is found to be
……………..
(Satisfactory/Good).

Authorized signatory with date and seal

 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I would like to express my profound gratitude to Mr.M.B Bheema kumar , Department of

Electronics & Communication Engineering in Gates Institute of Technology. I would like to express
my special thanks to our mentor Mr.M.B.Bheema kumar for him time and efforts he provided throughout
the period. Your useful advice and suggestions were really helpful to me during the project’s completion.
In this aspect, I am eternally grateful to you.
I would like to acknowledge that this project was completed entirely by me and not by someone
else.

Signature

Your Name
 CHAPTER 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Problem Statement

Technology and innovations have long improved farming over the world and, as Industry 4.0 quickly
spread, farmers have embraced high-level automation and data exchange, driving a transformation called
Farming 4.0. Consequently, precise and even real-time field information have become easily accessible.
Thought, analysing all this information requires great skills and tools, like mathematical knowledge and
powerful computational algorithms to reach farmers expectations.
This research explores the Crop Rotation Problem (CRP) and its relevance for the integration of
Precision Agriculture (PA) and farm management. This paper presents a new mathematical approach for
the CRP based on the nutrient balance and crop requirements, increasing the sustainable appealing of the
problem. A real-encoded genetic algorithm (GA) was developed for optimization of the CRP.
The results indicate good performance in mid and long-term crop schedule Technological advances
have been widely shaped agriculture. Innovations in sensor devices and embedded systems have improved
tillage and crop yields. Efficiency in resources management and autonomous data acquisition turned out to
be essential among farmers. As Industry 4.0 thoughts have pushed ahead manufacturing units, agriculture
also moves toward a transformation called Farming 4.0, or also referred to as Agriculture 4.0.
In general, important developments in automation have been noticed, related to Precision
Agriculture expansion Precision agriculture (PA) follows from the integration of crop management and
information technologies. The field measurement of crop requirements and the proper supply of these
demands are promoted by PA and intend to improve crop production and resource consumption,
approaching sustainable ideas and reducing environment impacts.
 CHAPTER 2
OVERVIEW OF THE VILLAGE COMMUNITY
Pothulanagepalle Live Weather
Temperature
02-07-2023
27.1°C to 34.9°C light rain, overcast clouds
03-07-2023
°C to 33.6°C overcast clouds, light rain
04-07-2023
°C to 32.9°C overcast clouds, light rain
05-07-2023
24.1°C to 28.4°C moderate rain, light rain
06-07-2023
23.9°C to 29.5°C light rain, overcast clouds

It belongs to Rayalaseema region. It is located 87 KM towards South from District headquarters Sri sathya
sai.It is a Mandal head quarter: 34.4 °C overcast clouds Humidity: 40%. Wind:8.82 m/sec towards Station
Name: "Gooty" observed on Now.
Demographics of Pothulanagepalle
Telugu is the Local Language here. Total population of Pothulanagepalle is 20974.Males are 10841 and
Femalesare 10,133 living in 4573 Houses. Total area of Pothulanagepalle is 4203 hectares.
HOW TO REACH POTHULANAGEPALLE
By Road
Dharmavarm is the Nearest Town to Pothulanagepalle. Dharmavarm is 28 km from Pothulanagepalle. Road
connectivity is therefrom Dharmavarm to Pothulanagepalle.
By Bus
Dharmavaram APSRTC Bus Station, Anantapur APSRTC Bus Station, Puttaparthi APSRTC Bus Station
are the nearby by Bus Stations to Pothulanagepalle. APSRTC runs Number of busses from major cities to
here
 BRIEF EXPLANATION ON CROP ROTATION

Crop rotation is the practice of growing a series of different types of crops in the same area across
a sequence of growing seasons. This practice reduces the reliance of crops on one set of nutrients, pest and
weed pressure, along with the probability of developing resistant pests and weeds.
Growing the same crop in the same place for many years in a row, known as monocropping,
gradually depletes the soil of certain nutrients and selects for both a highly competitive pest and weed
community. Without balancing nutrient use and diversifying pest and weed communities, the productivity
of monocultures is highly dependent on external inputs that may be harmful to the soils fertility. Conversely,
a well-designed crop rotation can reduce the need for synthetic fertilizers and herbicides by better using
ecosystem services from a diverse set of crops.
Additionally, crop rotations can improve soil structure and organic matter, which reduces erosion
and increases farm system resilience.
Agriculturalists have long recognized that suitable rotations such as planting spring crops for
livestock in place of grains for human consumption make it possible to restore or to maintain productive
soils. Ancient Near Eastern farmers practiced crop rotation in 6000 BC without understanding the
chemistry, alternately planting legumes and cereals. Unknowingly, this was the start of a practice that would
soon benefit many farmers.
Two-field systems
Under a two-field rotation, half the land was planted in a year, while the other half lay fallow. Then,
in the next year, the two fields were reversed. In China both the two-field and three-field system had been
used since the Eastern Zhou period. From the times of Charlemagne (died 814), farmers in Europe
transitioned from a two-field crop rotation to a three-field crop rotation.
Three-field systems
From the end of the Middle Ages until the 20th century, Europe's farmers practiced a three-field
rotation, where available lands were divided into three sections. One section was planted in the autumn
 with rye or winter wheat, followed by spring oats or barley; the second section grew crops such as peas,
lentils, or beans; and the third field was left fallow.
The three fields were rotated in this manner so that every three years, one of the fields would rest
and lie fallow. Under the two-field system, if one has a total of 600 acres (2.4 km2) of fertile land, one
would only plant 300 acres. Under the new three-field rotation system, one would plant (and therefore
harvest) 400 acres. But the additional crops had a more significant effect than mere quantitative
productivity. Since the spring crops were mostly legumes, they increased the overall nutrition of the people
of Northern Europe.
Four-field rotations
Farmers in the region of Wasteland (in present-day northern Belgium) pioneered a four-field rotation
in the early 16th century, and the British agriculturist Charles Townshend (1674–1738) popularised this
system in the 18th century. The sequence of four crops (wheat, turnips, barley and clover), included a fodder
crop and a grazing crop, allowing livestock to be bred year-round. The four-field crop rotation became a
key development in the British Agricultural Revolution. The rotation between arable and ley is sometimes
called ley farming.

Modern developments
George Washington Carver (1860s–1943) studied crop-rotation methods in the United States,
teaching southern farmers to rotate soil-depleting crops like cotton with soil-enriching crops like peanuts
and peas.
In the Green Revolution of the mid-20th century the traditional practice of crop rotation gave way
in some parts of the world to the practice of supplementing the chemical inputs to the soil through
topdressing with fertilizers, adding (for example) ammonium nitrate or urea and
restoring soil pH with lime. Such practices aimed to increase yields, to prepare soil for specialist crops, and
to reduce waste and inefficiency by simplifying planting, harvesting, and irrigation.
Crop choice
A preliminary assessment of crop interrelationships can be found in how each crop:
1. contributes to soil organic matter (SOM) content
2. provides for pest management
3. manages deficient or excess nutrients
4. how it contributes to or controls for soil erosion
5. interbreeds with other crops to produce hybrid offspring, and
6. impacts surrounding food webs and field ecosystems

Crop choice is often related to the goal the farmer is looking to achieve with the rotation, which
could be weed management, increasing available nitrogen in the soil, controlling for erosion, or increasing
soil structure and biomass, to name a few. When discussing crop rotations, crops are classified in different
ways depending on what quality is being assessed: by family, by nutrient needs/benefits, and/or by
profitability (i.e. cash crop versus cover crop). For example, giving adequate attention to plant family is
essential to mitigating pests and pathogens.
However, many farmers have success managing rotations by planning sequencing and cover crops
around desirable cash crops. The following is a simplified classification based on crop quality and purpose.
Row crops
Many crops which are critical for the market, like vegetables, are row crops (that is, grown in tight
rows). While often the most profitable for farmers, these crops are more taxing on the soil. Row crops
typically have low biomass and shallow roots: this means the plant contributes low residue to the
surrounding soil and has limited effects on structure. With much of the soil around the plant exposed to
disruption by rainfall and traffic, fields with row crops experience faster break down of organic matter by
microbes, leaving fewer nutrients for future plants.
In short, while these crops may be profitable for the farm, they are nutrient depleting. Crop rotation
practices exist to strike a balance between short-term profitability and long-term productivity.
Legumes

A great advantage of crop rotation comes from the interrelationship of nitrogen-fixing crops with
nitrogen-demanding crops. Legumes, like alfalfa and clover, collect available nitrogen from the atmosphere
and store it in nodules on their root structure. When the plant is harvested, the biomass of uncollected roots
breaks down, making the stored nitrogen available to future crops.
In addition, legumes have heavy tap roots that burrow deep into the ground, lifting soil for better
tilth and absorption of water.
Grasses and cereals
Cereal and grasses are frequent cover crops because of the many advantages they supply to soil
quality and structure. The dense and far-reaching root systems give ample structure to surrounding soil and
provide significant biomass for soil organic matter.
Grasses and cereals are key in weed management as they compete with undesired plants for soil
space and nutrients.
Green manure
Green manure is a crop that is mixed into the soil. Both nitrogen-fixing legumes and nutrient
scavengers, like grasses, can be used as green manure. Green manure of legumes is an excellent source of
nitrogen, especially for organic systems, however, legume biomass does not contribute to lasting soil
organic matter like grasses do.
Planning a rotation
There are numerous factors that must be taken into consideration when planning a crop rotation.
Planning an effective rotation requires weighing fixed and fluctuating production circumstances: market,
farm size, labour supply, climate, soil type, growing practices, etc. Moreover, a crop rotation must consider
in what condition one crop will leave the soil for the succeeding crop and how one crop can be seeded with
another crop. For example, a nitrogen-fixing crop, like a legume, should always precede a nitrogen depleting
one; similarly, a low residue crop (i.e.a crop with low biomass) should be offset with a high biomass cover
crop, like a mixture of grasses and legumes.
There is no limit to the number of crops that can be used in a rotation, or the amount of time a
rotation takes to complete. Decisions about rotations are made years prior, seasons prior, or even at the last
minute when an opportunity to increase profits or soil quality presents itself.
Implementation
Crop rotation systems may be enriched by the influences of other practices such as the addition of
livestock and manure, intercropping or multiple cropping, and is common in organic cropping systems.
Incorporation of livestock
Introducing livestock makes the most efficient use of critical sod and cover crops; livestock (through
manure) are able to distribute the nutrients in these crops throughout the soil rather than removing nutrients
from the farm through the sale of hay.
Mixed farming or the practice of crop cultivation with the incorporation of livestock can help
manage crops in a rotation and cycle nutrients. Crop residues provide animal feed, while the animals provide
manure for replenishing crop nutrients and draft power. These processes promote internal nutrient cycling
and minimize the need for synthetic fertilizers and large-scale machinery. As an additional benefit, the cattle,
sheep and/or goat provide milk and can act as a cash crop in the times of economic hardship.
Intercropping

Multiple cropping systems, such as intercropping or companion planting, offer more diversity and
complexity within the same season or rotation. An example of companion planting is the three sisters, the
inter-planting of corn with pole beans and vining squash or pumpkins. In this system, the beans provide
nitrogen; the corn provides support for the beans and a "screen" against squash vine borer; the vining squash
provides a weed suppressive canopy and a discouragement for corn-hungry raccoons.
Double-cropping is common where two crops, typically of different species, are grown sequentially
in the same growing season, or where one crop(e.g.vegetable) is grown continuously with a cover crop (e.g.
wheat).This is advantageous for small farms, which often cannot afford to leave cover crops to replenish
the soil for extended periods of time, as larger farms can. When multiple cropping is implemented on small
farms, these systems can maximize benefits of crop rotation on available land resources.
Organic farming
Crop rotation is a required practice, in the United States, for farm seeking organic certification. The
“Crop Rotation Practice Standard” for the National Organic Program under the U.S. Code of Federal
Regulations, states farmers are required to implement a crop rotation that maintains or builds soil organic
matter, works to control pests, manages and conserves nutrients, and protects against erosion. Producers of
perennial crops that aren’t rotated may utilize other practices, such as cover crops, to maintain soil health.
 In addition to lowering the need for inputs (by controlling for pests and weeds and increasing
available nutrients), crop rotation helps organic growers increase the amount of biodiversity their farms.
Biodiversity is also a requirement of organic certification, however, there are no rules in place to regulate
or reinforce this standard. Increasing the biodiversity of crops has beneficial effects on the surrounding
ecosystem and can host a greater diversity of fauna, insects, and beneficial microorganisms in the soil as
found by McDaniel et al 2014 and Lori et al 2017.
Some studies point to increased nutrient availability from crop rotation under organic systems
compared to conventional practices as organic practices are less likely to inhibit of beneficial microbes in
soil organic matter.
While multiple cropping and intercropping benefit from many of the same principals as crop
rotation, they do not satisfy the requirement under the NOP.
Benefits
Describe the benefits to yield in rotated crops as "The Rotation Effect". There are many benefits of
rotation systems. The factors related to the increase are broadly due to alleviation of the negative factors of
monoculture cropping systems. Specifically, improved nutrition; pest, pathogen, and weed stress reduction;
and improved soil structure have been found in some cases to be correlated to beneficial rotation effects.
Other benefits of rotation cropping systems include production cost advantages. Overall financial
risks are more widely distributed over more diverse production of crops and/or livestock. Less reliance is
placed on purchased inputs and over time crops can maintain production goals with fewer inputs.
 CHAPTER 3

COMMUNITY SERVICE PART

Activities undertaken in the community:
1. Spread Awareness to Neighbours.
2. Spread Awareness to Farmers.
3. Spread Awareness to Relatives.
4. Spread Awareness to Students.
5. Spread Awareness to Public.
Values, life skills, and technical skills the student acquired:
1. Self-Awareness
2. Time Management
3. Critical thinking
4. Creative thinking
5. Decision making
6. Problem Solving
7. Effective communication
Report of the mini-project work done in the related subject w.r.t the
habitation/village
Assessment

CONTEXT
More diversified crop rotations are a key factor in reducing weed, disease and pest pressure while
reducing the use of phytosanitary products. The increase in available data calls for the development of
new methods and indicators to characterize crop rotations.

OBJECTIVES

This paper presents an application of network analysis to assess the diversity of crop rotations
from the Land Parcel Identification System, which now provides field boundaries and type of crops
grown in a given year for farmers receiving subsidies from the European Common Agricultural Policy.
Different indicators are presented to compare the diversity of crop rotations for the 22 regions of
mainland France (corresponding to the boundaries of former administrative regions) and the influence
of some methodological choices are discussed.

METHODS

Using LPIS data, previous-following crop pairs have been identified for two thirds of the French
fields for three crop successions (from 2017 to 2018, from 2018 to 2019 and from 2019 to 2020). These
data were used to build crop rotation networks for each region. Crop rotations were simulated from
those networks in order to estimate the return time of soft winter wheat, which is the most cultivated
crop in the country.

SIGNIFICANCE

The methodology developed in this article provides some initial guidelines for developing relevant
agronomic indicators from crop rotation network analysis. It has been shown that the estimated return
time could be an indicator of the intensity of use of phytosanitary products, and could therefore be used
to guide public policies aimed at reducing the use of these products.

Converting crop rotations into networks

With no threshold for the relative importance of the previous-following crop pairs, differences in
crop rotation networks between regions seem limited (Fig. 2). All networks appear to be densely
connected. But this hides the fact that a large proportion of crop successions are carried out on only a
very small number of fields. Important difference between regions appear when removing the previous-
following crop pairs present on less than 0.05% of the fields of each region. For instance, the
Discussion

The application of network analysis to identify crop rotations for French regions showed that the
difference in crop rotation diversity was high among regions (Fig. 2). The analysis conducted here
showed that the mean number of precedents per crop could vary from three to nine between regions
(Fig. 3b).

Regarding the limitations of this study, these values are only relevant at the regional scale. For
example, the mean number of crop precedents is probably much lower when calculated at lower

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships
that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Crop rotation networks were similar between the three crop successions compared, but differed
among regions. Ignoring the most uncommon previous-following crop pairs, the mean number of
precedents per crop ranged from three to nine depending on the region. The estimated return times for
winter wheat increase when taking into account grasslands in crop rotation networks, but in any case
the use of phytosanitary products was negatively correlated with the return time.
 CHAPTER 4
ACTIVITY LOG FOR THE FIRST WEEK
DAY BRIEF DESCRIPTION LEARNING PERSON IN-
& OF THE DAILY OUTCOME CHARGE
DATE ACTIVITY SIGNATURE
Day-1 Selecting the community service Selecting the CSP title
project title. name

Day-2 Discussing with mentor about title Title making

Day-3 Making problem statement Identifying the problem

Day-4 Making problem statement. Identifying the problem

Day-5 Making problem statement. Identifying the problem

Day-6 Making problem statement. Identifying the problem

 WEEKLY REPORT WEEK–
1(From Dt:01/05/2023 to 06/05/2023)
Objective of the Activity Done:

Object report:

Community service project means our project has to relate to society.

In society there are so many issues, but we searched for the major problem faced by most of

farmers in India are not getting a fair crop yield.

Future we need a good foundation. So, I select the topic “CROP ROTATION”

So I decided to give the awareness for Farmers.

I met the mentor to finalise the title of the project.

 ACTIVITY LOG FOR THE SECOND WEEK
DAY BRIEF LEARNING PERSON IN-
& DESCRIPTION OUTCOME CHARGE
DATE OF THE DAILY SIGNATURE
ACTIVITY
Day-1 A survey form based on the type of habitation toSurvey on
be prepared before visiting the habitation with the internet from
help of mentor. google.

Day-2 A survey form based on the type of habitation toSurvey on

be prepared before visiting the habitation with the internet from
help of mentor. google.

Day-3 A survey form based on the type of habitation to Survey on

be prepared before visiting the habitation with the internet from
help of mentor. google.

Day-4 A survey form based on the type of habitation to Survey on

be prepared before visiting the habitation with the internet from
help of mentor. google.

Day-5 A survey form based on the type of habitation to Survey on

be prepared before visiting the habitation with the internet from
help of mentor. google.

Day-6 A survey form based on the type of habitation to Survey on

be prepared before visiting the habitation with the internet from
help of mentor. google.
 WEEKLY REPORT
WEEK–2 From Dt:08/05/2023 to Dt:13/05/2023)
Objective of the Activity Done:

Object report:

In this week firstly, I make a survey on crop rotation with the help of google.

Based on the google information on crop maintenance I understand the advantages of crop
rotation.
And also refer some videos on impacts of crop rotation on you tube.

Then I analysed one format on Crop Rotation.

 ACTIVITY LOG FOR THE THIRD WEEK

DAY& BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF LEARNING PERSON IN-

DATE THE DAILY ACTIVITY OUTCOME CHARGE
SIGNATURE

Day-1 A preliminary survey including the Estimate crop

socioeconomic conditions of the allotted growth
habitation to be conducted.

Day-2 A preliminary survey including the Estimate crop

socioeconomic conditions of the allotted growth
habitation to be conducted.

Day-3 A survey form based on the type of Estimate crop

habitation to be prepared before visiting the growth
habitation with the help of social sciences
faculty.

Day-4 A survey form based on the type of Estimate crop

habitation to be prepared before visiting the growth
habitation with the help of social sciences
faculty.

Day-5 A survey form based on the type of Estimate crop

habitation to be prepared before visiting the growth
habitation with the help of social sciences
faculty.

Day-6 A survey form based on the type of Estimate crop

habitation to be prepared before visiting the growth
habitation with the help of social sciences
faculty.
 WEEKLY REPORT

WEEK – 3 (From Dt:15/05/2023to Dt:20/05/2023)

Objective of the Activity Done:

Object report:

In this week firstly I analysed the crop rotation process. After I estimate the productivity

the people for their daily need and make detailed survey on impacts by asking the

people in village with the help of this survey observed that most of the people say’s using natural
fertilisers to crop rotation.
 ACTIVITY LOG FOR THE FOURTH WEEK
DAY BRIEF LEARNING PERSON IN-
& DESCRIPTION OUTCOME CHARGE
DATE OF THE DAILY SIGNATURE
ACTIVITY

Day-1 Survey conducting for the people on Feedback on survey

crop production by crop rotation in the
habitation.

Day-2 Survey conducting for the people on Feedback on survey

crop production by crop rotation in the
habitation.

Day-3 Survey conducting for the people on Feedback on survey

crop production by crop rotation in the
habitation.

Day-4 Survey conducting for the people on Feedback on survey

crop production by crop rotation in the
habitation.

Day-5 Survey conducting for the people on Feedback on survey

crop production by crop rotation in the
habitation.

Day-6 Survey conducting for the people on Feedback on survey

crop production by crop rotation in the
habitation.
 WEEKLY REPORT
WEEK–4 (From Dt: 22/05/2023 to Dt:27/05/2023)
Objective of the Activity Done:

Object report:

In this week, I got the feedback from the people on advantages of crop rotation. Based on the

feedback I Understand the problem that changing weather conditions and other accidents interfere
with crop rotation.

So, I decided to give Some awareness on crop rotation advantages.

I browse about how crop rotation helps in soil fertility.

 ACTIVITY LOG FOR THE FIFTH WEEK
DAY BRIEF LEARNING PERSON IN-
& DESCRIPTION OUTCOME CHARGE
DATE OF THE DAILY SIGNATURE
ACTIVITY

Day-1 Based on the survey and Need awareness for the

the specific requirements of people on crop rotation.
the habitation.

Day-2 Preparing chart Detailed information

presentation on crop about why crop rotation
rotation. is advisable.

Day-3 Programmes to be Verbal information and

conducted presentation.

Day-4 spread over two weeks of To gather more

time. information.

Day-5 The list of activities Survey in a habitation.

suggested could be taken
into consideration

Day-6 The list of activities Need to conduct

suggested could be taken awareness for people.
into consideration
 WEEKLY REPORT

WEEK – 5 (From Dt:29/05/2023 to Dt:03/06/2023)

Objective of the Activity Done:

Detailed Report:

Based on the survey and the specific requirements of the habitation,

different awareness campaigns and programmes to be conducted.

spread over two weeks of time. The list of activities suggested could be taken into consideration.

I prepare, a chart presentation on benefits of crop rotation for people awareness.

 ACTIVITY LOG FOR THE SIXTH WEEK
DAY & BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF LEARNING PERSON IN-

DATE THE DAILY ACTIVITY OUTCOME CHARGE

SIGNATURE

Day-1 Visiting the villages and How many fields were used
investigate the people who are in the system of Crop
more using crop rotation process. Rotation.

Day-2 Visiting the villages and How many fields were used
investigate the people who are in the system of Crop
more using crop rotation process. Rotation.

Day-3 Visiting the villages and How many fields were used
investigate the people who are in the system of Crop
more using crop rotation process. Rotation.

Day-4 Programs could be in consonance Awareness programs

with the village people. planning.

Day-5 Programs could be in consonance Awareness programs

with the village people. planning.

Day-6 Analysing the survey report. How to grow different plant

families in your beds or
rows every other season.
 WEEKLY REPORT

WEEK – 6 (From Dt: 05/06/2023 to Dt: 10/06/2023 )

Objective of the Activity Done:

Detailed Report:

By conducting a survey, I analyse how crop rotations be used to improve soil health.

Mainly, it reduces pest and disease pressure, and increase yields.

So with the help of this survey, I analyse the importance of practice of crop rotation for

Physical, chemical, and bio logical environment of soil.

 ACTIVITY LOG FOR THE SEVENTH WEEK

DAY BRIEF LEARNING PERSON IN-

& DESCRIPTION OUTCOME CHARGE
DATE OFTHE DAILY SIGNATURE
ACTIVITY

Day-1 Awareness conducting on Crop rotation is a tool for

crop rotation. improving soil health and
increasing crop productivity

Day-2 Awareness conducting on Crop rotation is a tool for

crop rotation. improving soil health and
increasing crop productivity

Day-3 Awareness conducting on Crop rotation is a tool for

crop rotation. improving soil health and
increasing crop productivity

Day-4 Awareness conducting on Crop rotation is a tool for

crop rotation. improving soil health and
increasing crop productivity

Day-5 Awareness conducting on Crop rotation is a tool for

crop rotation. improving soil health and
increasing crop productivity

Day-6 Awareness conducting on Crop rotation is a tool for

crop rotation. improving soil health and
increasing crop productivity
 WEEKLY REPORT

WEEK – 7 (From Dt:12/06/2023 to Dt:17/06/2023)

Objective of the Activity Done:

Detailed Report:

During the last week of the Community Service Project, a detailed report of the outcome of the

6 weeks work to be drafted and a copy was submitted to the guide.

So the mentor review the feedback and give some suggestions on conducting awareness program.

Then I went to some nearby villages for giving awareness on crop rotation.

In this program I aware the people on benefits of crop rotation.

 ACTIVITY LOG FOR THE EIGHTH WEEK
DAY BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF LEARNING PERSON IN-
& THE DAILY ACTIVITY OUTCOME CHARGE
DATE SIGNATURE

Day-1 During the last week of the Community

Service Project, a detailed report of the
outcome of the 6 weeks work to be
Submitted
drafted and a copy shall be submitted to
the local administration.

Day-2 This report will be a basis for the next

batch of students visiting that particular
habitation.
Future

Day-3 The same report submitted to the

teacher-mentor will be evaluated by the
mentor and suitable marks are awarded
correction
for onward submission to the
University.
Day-4 The same report submitted to the
teacher-mentor will be evaluated by the
mentor and suitable marks are awarded
correction
for onward submission to the
University.
Day-5 The same report submitted to the
teacher-mentor will be evaluated by the
mentor and suitable marks are awarded
correction
for onward submission to the
University.
Day-6 The same report submitted to the
teacher-mentor will be evaluated by the
mentor.
correction
 WEEKLY REPORT

WEEK – 8 (From Dt: 19/05/2023 to Dt: 24/06/2023)

Objective of the Activity Done:

Detailed Report:

During the last week of the Community Service Project, a detailed report of the

outcome of the 8 weeks work to be drafted and a copy shall be submitted to the mentor.

The mentor gave me suggestions on making the report and make corrections.

This report will be a basis for the next batch of students visiting that particular habitation.

The same report submitted to the teacher-mentor will be evaluated by the mentor

suitable marks are awarded for onward submission to the University.

 CHAPTER 5

OUTCOMES DESCRIPTION

Details of the Socio-Economic Survey of the Village/Habitation. Attach the

questionnaire prepared for the survey.

In this community service project i gain the lot of information about the crop rotation like:

1. What crops should I include in my rotation?

A. Wheat, Maize and Rice
2. What are the nutrient levels in each field?
A. Nitrogen(N), Phosphorous(P) and Potassium(K)
3. what is the role of water in crop?
A. Water helps in cell enlargement due to turgor pressure and cell division which ultimately increase
the growth of plant.
5. How is crop rotation sustainable?
A. Because different crops have different nutritional needs.
6.What crops are commonly rotated?
A. Maize, Rice and Wheat.

DESCRIPTION OF THE COMMUNITY AWARENESS PROGRAMMES

CONDUCTED W.R.T THE PROBLEMS AND THEIR OUTCOMES.
The goal of community awareness is to increase the community's knowledge of the
available programs and services offered. This is accomplished by informing the
general public through various activities.

Community Service Helps Connect to the Community.

It Benefits Your Career Prospects.

Community Service Raises Social Awareness.

Community Service Establishes Contacts and Friendships.

Community Service Helps Improve Your Skills.

STUDENT SELF-EVALUATION FOR THE COMMUNITY SERVICE PROJECT

Student Name : P.Navyasree

Registration No : 21F21A0497

Period of CSP : 8 weeks From : 01/05/2023 To: 24/06/2023

Date of Evaluation : 26/06/2023

Name of the person in-charge : Mr.M.B.Bheema kumar

Address with mobile number : Kothacheruvu(v)(M), Sri sathya sai (dist)-515133,

9392511541
PLEASE RATE YOUR PERFORMANCE IN THE FOLLOWING AREAS:
RATING SCALE: 1 IS LOWEST AND 5 HIGHEST RANK

1) Oral communication 1 2 3 4 5

2) Written communication 1 2 3 4 5
3) Proactiveness 1 2 3 4 5

4) Interaction ability with community 1 2 3 4 5

5) Positive Attitude 1 2 3 4 5

6) Self-confidence 1 2 3 4 5
7) Ability to learn 1 2 3 4 5

8) Work Plan and organization 1 2 3 4 5

9) Professionalism 1 2 3 4 5

10) Creativity 1 2 3 4 5
11) Quality of work done 1 2 3 4 5

12) Time Management 1 2 3 4 5

13) Understanding the Community 2 3 4 5
1

14) Achievement of Desired Outcomes 1 2 3 4 5

15) OVERALL PERFORMANCE 1 2 3 4 5

Date: Signature of the Student

 Evaluation by the Person in-charge in the Community/Habitation

Student name : P.Navyasree

Registration No
Period of CSP From
Date of evaluation
Name of the person in charge
Address with mobile number
(9392511541)
: 21F21A0497
: 01/05/2023 To 24/06/2023
: 26/06/2023
: Mr.M.B.Bheema kumar
: Kothacheruvu(V),(M), Sri sathya sai(dist)-515133,

Please rate the student’s performance in the following areas:

Please note that your evaluation shall be done independent of the Student’s
self-evaluation Rating Scale:
1 is lowest and 5 is highest rank

1) Oral communication 1 2 3 4 5

2) Written communication 1 2 3 4 5

3) Proactiveness 1 2 3 4 5

4) Interaction ability with community 1 2 3 4 5

5) Positive Attitude 1 2 3 4 5

6) Self-confidence 1 2 3 4 5
7) Ability to learn 1 2 3 4 5

8) Work Plan and organization 1 2 3 4 5

9) Professionalism 1 2 3 4 5

10) Creativity 1 2 3 4 5
11) Quality of work done 1 2 3 4 5

12) Time Management 1 2 3 4 5

13) Understanding the Community 2 3 4 5
1

14) Achievement of Desired Outcomes 1 2 3 4 5

15) OVERALL PERFORMANCE 1 2 3 4 5

Date: Signature of the Supervisor

Awareness of people