The fossil fuels lobby includes paid representatives of corporations involved in the fossil fuel industry

(oil, gas, coal), as well as related industries like chemicals, plastics, aviation and other transportation.
[1] Because of their wealth and the importance of energy, transport and chemical industries to local,
national and international economies, these lobbies have the capacity and money to attempt to have
outsized influence on governmental policy. In particular, the lobbies have been known to obstruct
policy related to environmental protection, environmental health and climate action.[2]

Lobbies are active in most fossil-fuel intensive economies with democratic governance, with
reporting on the lobbies most prominent in Canada, Australia, the United States and Europe,
however the lobbies are present in many parts of the world. Big Oil companies such as ExxonMobil,
Shell, BP, TotalEnergies, Chevron Corporation, and ConocoPhillips are among the largest corporations
associated with the fossil fuels lobby.[3] The American Petroleum Institute is a powerful industry
lobbyist for Big Oil with significant influence in Washington, D.C.[4][5][6] In Australia, Australian
Energy Producers, formerly known as the Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration
Association (APPEA), has significant influence in Canberra and helps to maintain favorable policy
settings for Oil and Gas.[7]

The presence of major fossil fuel companies and national oil companies at global forums for decision
making, like the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,[8] Paris Climate Agreement
negotiations,[8] and United Nations Climate Change conferences has been criticised.[9] The lobby is
known for exploiting international crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic,[10] or the 2022 Russian
invasion of Ukraine,[11][12] to try to roll back existing regulations or justify new fossil fuel
development.[10][11] Lobbyists try to retain fossil fuel subsidies.[13]

Influence

Those corporations that continue to invest in new fossil fuel exploration, new fossil fuel exploitation,
are really in flagrant breach of their fiduciary duty because the science is abundantly clear that this is
something we can no longer do.

— Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change[14]

Globally, net income of the oil and gas industry reached a record US$4 trillion in 2022.[15]

After the COVID-19 pandemic, energy company profits increased with higher fuel prices resulting
from the Russian invasion of Ukraine, falling debt levels, tax write-downs of projects shut down in
Russia, and backing off from earlier plans to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.[16]

The energy lobby has a history of conflict with international interests and democratic global
governance. According to the International Sustainable Energy Organization for Renewable Energy
and Energy Efficiency the second World Climate Conference "was sabotaged by the USA and oil
lobbies"[17] whereupon UNISEO proceeded to set up a Global Energy Charter "which protects life,
health, climate and the biosphere from emissions." According to the organization, these same
"reactionary energy lobby groups tried to boycott this Charter with the help from oil- and coal-
producing nations and succeeded to keep the energy transition out of the Rio Conference on
Environment & Development (Earth Summit) in 1992, to continue this game in all Climate
Conferences in Berlin, Kyoto, The Hague and Marrakech, where the USA boycotted the Kyoto
protocol and still ignores the Charter."[17] It is estimated that during the 2010s the five biggest oil
and gas companies, and their industry groups, spent at least €251 million lobbying the European
Union over climate policies.[18] Lobbying was also influential in Canada and Australia during the
2010s.[19][20]

During the 14th session of the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development, according
to the International Institute for Sustainable Development Bulletin, "One minister is said to have
challenged the North's renewable energy lobby with the words: why not 'light up' the dark zones of
the world by 'extinguishing some of the candles' in yours?"[21]

According to the UNFCCC, 636 fossil fuel lobbyists attended COP27.[22]

Publicly, fossil-fuel corporations say that they support the Paris Agreement aiming to limit global
warming below 2 °C in 2100.[23] Internal reports of BP and Shell show that they have made
contingency business models plans for warming of more than 3 °C of global warming in 2050.[23]

Refineries owned by energy companies produce large amounts of air pollution.

Environmental impact of represented companies

As of 2015, many of the most influential members of the energy lobby have been among the top
polluters in the United States, with Conoco, Exxon, and General Electric ranking in the top six.[24]
According to the Environmental Integrity Project, a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization established in
March 2002 by former attorneys at the Environmental Protection Agency, "companies like
ExxonMobil and Sunoco keep reporting record profits while increasing emissions or more cancer
causing chemicals from their refineries."[25] The energy lobby has been criticized by
environmentalists for using its influence to try to block or dilute legislation regarding global climate
change.[26]

Australia

In 2023 the Australian Energy Council lobbied against adding an environmental component to the
National Electricity Objective.[27] Reforms to the Safeguard Mechanism were lobbied against by
Australian Energy Producers and the Minerals Council of Australia. [28]
United States

This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly
available information. (February 2018)

Placard "Separate oil and state", at the People's Climate March (2017)

In the 2000 elections, over $34 million was contributed, with 78% of that money going to
Republicans. In 2004, oil and gas companies contributed over $25 million to political campaigns,
donating 80% of that money to Republicans. In the 2006 election cycle, oil and gas companies
contributed over $19 million to political campaigns. 82% of that money went to Republican
candidates, while the remaining 18% went to Democrats. Electric utilities also heavily favor
Republicans; their contributions have recently ranged between $15–20 million.[29][30] From 2003 to
2006, the energy lobby also contributed $58.3 million to state-level campaigns. By comparison,
alternative energy interests contributed around half a million dollars in the same time period.[31]

During the United States elections in 2012 which includes the presidential election there was much
spending by the lobbies.[32]

In 2022, approximately $125.05 million was spent by the fossil fuel industry to influence the
government.[33]

Governmental influence in the United States

The largest oil and gas companies that are sometime collectively referred to as Big Oil, and their
industry lobbyist arm, the American Petroleum Institute (API), have spent large amounts of money
every year on lobbying and political campaigns, and employ hundreds of lobbyists, to obstruct and
delay government action to address climate change.

The fossil fuel lobby has considerable clout in Washington, D.C., and in other political centers,[4][34]
[35][36] and have scored key political appointments in the administrations of U.S. President George
W. Bush and President Donald Trump.[37][38][39] President George W. Bush, like his father President
George H. W. Bush, was a former oil industry senior executive, and President Trump's most senior
cabinet official, his first Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, was the CEO of one of largest of the Big Oil
companies, ExxonMobil. Fossil fuel industry interests spend many times as much on advancing their
agenda in the halls of power than do ordinary citizens and environmental activists, with the former
spending $2 billion in the years 2000–2016 on climate change lobbying in the United States.[40][6]
Big Oil companies often adopt "sustainability principles" that are at odds with the policy agenda their
lobbyists advocate, which often entails sowing doubt about the reality and impacts of climate change
and forestalling government efforts to address them. API launched a public relations disinformation
campaign with the aim of creating doubt in the public mind so that "climate change becomes a non-
issue."[4][6]
The fossil fuel industry spends large amounts of money on American political campaigns, with about
2/3 of its political contributions over the past several decades fueling Republican politicians,[41] and
outspending many fold political contributions for renewable energy.[42] Fossil fuel industry political
contributions reward politicians who vote against environmental protections. According to a study
published by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
as voting by a member of Congress turned more anti-environment, as measured by his/her voting
record as scored by the League of Conservation Voters (LCV), the fossil fuel industry contributions
that this member of Congress received increased. On average, a 10% decrease in the LCV score was
correlated with an increase of $1,700 in campaign contributions from the industry for the campaign
following the Congressional term.[43][44]

Bush administration links to Big Oil

Various scandals involving prominent politicians have drawn attention to the close links between the
energy lobby and the U.S. government, particularly the influence wielded by the energy lobby in the
Bush administration. Lobbying continued after the Bush administration.[45] In June 2005, documents
emerged that revealed that the Bush administration had consulted Exxon regarding its stance on the
Kyoto Protocol. According to The Guardian, "In briefing papers given before meetings to the U.S.
Under Secretary of State for Democracy and Global Affairs, Paula Dobriansky, between 2001 and
2004, the administration is found thanking Exxon executives for the company's 'active involvement'
in helping to determine climate change policy, and also seeking its advice on what climate change
policies the company might find acceptable."[46] In November 2005, documents revealed that Vice
President Dick Cheney's Energy Task Force met with executives from large oil companies, although
chief executives of those companies denied involvement before the Senate Energy and Commerce
committees. Environmentalists were not allowed access to the Energy Task Force's activities, which
was responsible for developing a national energy policy.[47][48] Oil companies also participated with
Dick Cheney's task force in a discussion of Iraqi oilfields, refineries and other energy infrastructure,
and two charts detailing Iraqi oil and gas projects, and "Foreign Suitors for Iraqi Oilfield Contracts."
The documents are dated two years before the 2003 invasion of Iraq, and six months before the 11
September attacks (9/11).[49][50]

House of Representatives

With the U.S. House of Representatives returning to Republican control in 2023, many fossil fuel
industry lobbyists have been given key staff jobs, including positions as chiefs of staff to House
Natural Resources Chairman Bruce Westerman, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, Pete Stauber,
and Tom Tiffany.[51]

Canada

From 2011 to 2018, fossil fuel industry lobbyists recorded 11,452 lobbying contacts with government
officials. This is significantly higher than other industries and averages out to six lobbying contacts
per day. Fossil fuel lobbyists contacted government officials five times more than non-government
environmental organizations.[52]
Canada's Lobbyist Act does not require companies to disclose how much money they spend on
lobbying the Canadian government, and does not require companies to register lobbyists that
interact with government officials who hold a title less than assistant deputy minister.[53]

The Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) is an advocacy group for energy companies
in Canada. CAPP states that their vision is to "enhance Canada's prosperity by enabling responsible
growth of Canada's upstream oil and natural gas industry." A large portion of CAPP's membership is
made up of oil refineries which harvest oil from the oil sands of Alberta. CAPP estimates that the oil
sands industry will pay about $8 billion in taxes over the next six years. The President of CAPP is Tim
McMillan, who previously served as the Minister of Trade and Minister of Rural and Remote Health
for the province of Saskatchewan.[54]

In July 2020, French energy company Total SA withdrew its membership from the Canadian
association of petroleum producers, which is a lobbying group that represents the oil and natural gas
producers in Canada. They withdrew after writing off US$7 billion of oil sands assets in Alberta
because of the high production costs. Total SA stated they left CAPP because of a "misalignment
between the organization's public positions and those expressed in Total's climate ambition
statement announced in May", according to jwnenergy.com.[55]

Government influence in Canada

In 2012 alone, 27 different energy companies and eight industry associations engaged in lobbying the
Canadian parliament in Ottawa. Enbridge and TransCanada, which are the two largest pipeline
companies in Canada, met with cabinet ministers 52 times between 2011 and 2012.[53] Since 2008,
the Canadian Energy Pipelines Association (CEPA) "met with public office holders 367 percent more
times than the two major Canadian automotive industry associations."

Included in the list of lobbyists for Big Oil in Canada are former government employees. Over the last
10 years this list has included Brenda Kenny, who served 10 years with the National Energy Board,
Paul Cheliak, a former economist for Natural Resources Canada, and Bruce Carson, a convicted thief
who served as the top policy analyst under prime minister Stephen Harper.[53]

From 2000 to 2018, oil production in Canada increased by 80%, but the royalties paid by the sector
decreased by 63%. In addition, the taxes paid by the oil companies was cut in half.[56]

Canadian oil industry's influence abroad

Canada's oil lobbyists spend money outside of Canada to further international agreements. In 2015,
lobbyists for TransCanada, the owner of the Keystone XL pipeline project, spent $500,000 in a single
legislative session lobbying Nebraska state senators. While U.S. law forbids foreign companies and
individuals from making political contributions, TransCanada officially made the contributions
through its U.S. subsidiary.[57]

Europe

Industry influence in European Union policy

The five biggest oil and gas companies spent at least 251 million euros lobbying the European Union
over climate policies since 2010. These lobbyists represent a total of 200 organizations. Some of
these companies include BP, Shell, Chevron, ExxonMobil and Total.[58] There have been 327 high-
level meetings between the EU and Big Oil and Gas since 2014, this averages to more than one
meeting a week. In the EU, there are 200 lobbyists working on behalf of the top five oil and gas
companies.[59] The European Green Deal was the #1 most lobbied topic at the European Union in
the first 100 days of the European Green Deal being implemented on 11 December 2019, accounting
for one-fifth of all high-level lobby meetings.[60]

Oil industry lobbying in the United Kingdom

Shell gas company began lobbying the United Kingdom government as early as 2011 to undermine
European renewable energy targets, according to The Guardian. They had several meetings with
European Commission president Jose Manuel Barroso, Shell successfully lobbied Barroso and his
predecessor, Jean-Claude Juncker, to move away from the plan which originally had binding, carbon-
cutting goals for each individual member state. Shell argued instead for gas expansion in Europe,
because they believed it would save 500 billion euros in a transition to a low carbon energy system.
[61]

Turkey

See also: Coal power in Turkey

In October 2021 a coal-fired power station was said by opposition MP Ali Öztunç to be still operating
without filters due to company lobbying.[62]