Professional Documents
Culture Documents
unit5 (1)
unit5 (1)
By
Dr.V.Tamilselvi , Professor/HoD
EEE
Mr.D.Rajasekaran ,
ASP/RMDEEE
Case Studies - 2
Objective:
• Application of the NPV and IRR method
• Evaluation of a hydro-power station
• Effect of environmental parameters on an
energy investment implementation
• Comparative assessment of a nuclear and a
RES-based power station
in Greece
Where?
a small hydro
power plant
Problem
Why? Statement What?
(1)
for a private (scale economy,
investment funding)
How big?
Problem Statement (2)
Initial Cost
REDUCED COST OF SMALL HYDRO POWER STATIONS
50kW
4500
500kW
1000kW
4000
5000kW
10000kW
3500
Local Market Mini
Local Market Micro
Reduced Cost (Euro/kW)
3000
Local Market Small
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
0 25 50 75 100 125 150
80000
70000
60000
50000
Energy (MWh)
40000
30000
20000
10000
0
1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
Year
Viability Analysis-IRR Prediction(1)
Initial Capital
Small Hydro Power Station Viability Analysis (IRR=10.0%)
Fixed M&O Cost
2
Variable M&O Cost
Tax Impact
Investment Revenues
1,5
Residual Value
Net Present Value
1
NPV
0,5
-0,5
-1
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Years of Operation
Viability Analysis-IRR Prediction(2)
Initial Capital
Small Hydro Power Station Viability Analysis (IRR=21.12%)
Fixed M&O Cost
1,0 Variable M&O Cost
Tax Impact
0,8 Investment Revenues
Residual Value
0,6
Net Present Value
0,4
0,2
NPV
0,0
-0,2
-0,4
-0,6
-0,8
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Years of Operation
Initial Cost Impact on IRR
Tsimovo Small Hydro Power Station
(υ=50%, γ=40%, No=10MW,Tax Incl.)
35%
n=10 years
30% n=15 years
25%
20%
IRR
15%
10%
5%
0%
1000 1250 1500 1750 2000
15%
IRR
10%
5%
0%
0 5 10 15 20 25
Years of Operation