Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Shouchuan Zhang - Duality Theorem and Drinfeld Double in Braided Tensor Categories
Shouchuan Zhang - Duality Theorem and Drinfeld Double in Braided Tensor Categories
r
X
i
v
:
m
a
t
h
/
0
3
0
7
2
5
5
v
2
[
m
a
t
h
.
R
A
]
1
2
D
e
c
2
0
0
4
Duality Theorem and Drinfeld Double in Braided
Tensor Categories
Shouchuan Zhang
Department of Mathematics, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, P.R.China
E-mail:z9491@yahoo.com.cn
Abstract
Let H be a nite Hopf algebra with C
H,H
= C
1
H,H
. The duality theorem is shown
for H, i.e.,
(R#H)#H
= R (H
) as algebras in C.
Also, it is proved that the Drinfeld double (D(H), [b]) is a quasi-triangular Hopf
algebra in C.
2000 Mathematics subject Classication: 16w30.
Keywords: Hopf algebra, braided tensor category, duality theorem, Drinfeld double.
1 Introduction and Preliminaries
It is well-known that in the work of C
,
(R#H)#U
= R (H#U) as algebras .
The basic construction of the Drinfeld double is due to Drinfeld [4]. S.Majid [7] and
D.E.Radiford [12] modied the treatment.
In this paper, we generalize the duality theorem and Drinfeld double into the braided
case, i.e., for a nite Hopf algebra H with C
H,H
= C
1
H,H
, we show that
(R#H)#H
= R (H
H
) as algebras in C
We also show that the Drinfeld double (D(H),[b]) is a quasi-triangular Hopf algebra in C.
= (d id
U
)(id
V
f id
U
)(id
V
b) : V
U
of a
morphism f : U V .
Let
cop
= C
H,H
and m
op
= mC
H,H
. We denote (H,
cop
, ) by H
cop
and (H, m
op
, )
by H
op
. Furthermore we denote ((H
)
op
)
cop
by H
.
A bialgebra (H, R,
) with convolution-invertible R in Hom
C
(I, H H) is called a
quasi-triangular bialgebra in C if (H,
, ) is a coalgebra and the following conditions are
satised:
(QT1) (
R) = (mm)(id C
H,H
id)(R ).
In this case, we also say that (H, R,
) is a braided quasi-triangular bialgebra.
Dually, we can dene a coquasi-triangular bialgebra (H, r, m) in the braided tensor
category C .
In particular, we say that (H, R) is quasi-triangular if (H, R,
cop
) is quasi-triangular.
Dually, we say that (H, r) is coquasi-triangular if (H, r, m
op
) is coquasi-triangular.
A morphism from HA to I in C is called a skew pairing on HA if the following
conditions are satised:
(SP1): (mid) = (id id)(id id ) ;
(SP2): (id m) = ( )(id C
H,A
id)(id id);
(SP3):(id ) =
H
;
(SP4):( id) =
A
.
If a morphism from V W to I in C satises
(id
U
)(C
V,U
id
W
) = ( id
U
)(id
V
C
U,W
)
for U = V, W, then is said to be symmetric with respect to the braiding C .
Lemma 1.1 If H has a left dual H
.
(iii) C
H,H
= C
1
H,H
.
(iv) C
H
,H
= C
1
H
,H
.
(v) (id
H
d)(C
H
,H
id
H
) = (d id
H
)(id
H
C
H,H
).
(vi) (id
H
d)(C
H
,H
id
H
) = (d id
H
)(id
H
C
H
,H
).
2
Proof. It is straightforward.
2 The Duality Theorem
In this section, we obtain the duality theorem for Hopf algebras living in the braided
tensor category C.
Throughout this section, H is a nite Hopf algebra with C
H,H
= C
1
H,H
living in
C. (R, ) is a left H-module algebra in C and R#H is the smash product in C. Let
H
= ((H
)
op
)
cop
.
The proof of Lemmas 2.1 2.7 is very similar to that of correspending results in [11].
Lemma 2.1 If (R, ) is an H-module algebra, let = (id)(b
id) : R H
op
R,
where b
= C
H,H
opb. Then
m = (mm)(id C
R,H
op id)( ).
Lemma 2.2 (1) (H, ) is a left H
, under the
multiplication m
H
H
= (id
H
d id
H
) and unity
H
H
= b.
In fact, if C is a braided tensor category determined by the (co)quasi-triangular struc-
ture of a (co)quasi-triangular Hopf algebra over a eld k, then H
H
can be viewed as
End
k
(H) or M
n
(k) = {A | A is an n n matrix over the eld k}.
Lemma 2.4 Let = (md id)(id C
H
,H
id id)(id id id)(id id b)
and = (dmid)(ididC
H,H
id)(idC
H,H
idid)(ididid)(ididb).
Then is an algebra morphism from H#H
to H
H
#H to H
H
.
Lemma 2.5 The following relation holds: m() = m()(id id)(id
C
H,H
C
H
,H
id)(ididC
H
,H
idid)(idC
H
,H
C
H,H
id)(C
H
,H
idid
C
H
,H
)(S id id id id id)(id id )(id C
H,H
id)(C
H,H
C
H
,H
)(id
C
H
,H
id).
Lemma 2.6 If the antipode of H is invertible, then is invertible.
3
Lemma 2.7 R#H becomes an H
=
(id )(C
H
,R
id).
Theorem 2.8 If H is a nite Hopf algebra with C
H,H
= C
1
H,H
, then
(R#H)#H
= R (H
H
) as algebras in C,
Where H
H
to H#H
such that w =
1
(S
1
H
); this can be done by Lemma 2.6 and [15, Theorem 4.1] . Since and S
1
are anti-
algebra morphisms, w is an algebra morphism. Set = (id )(C
H,H
id)(b id).
We now dene a morphism = (idm
H#H
)(idwidid)(C
H
,R
idid)(idid)
from (R#H)#H
to R (H
H
) to (R#H)#H
. It
is straightforward to verify that = id and = id.
To see that is an algebra morphism, we only need to show that
= (id ) is an
algebra morphism. Set = (id )(S
1
H
)C
H
,R
, which is a morphism from R to
R (H
H
H
,R
id)( ) = (id m)( )( id
id)(id C
H,R
id)(id id C
H
,R
)( id id). Applying this, we see that
is an
algebra morphism.
3 Drinfeld Double
In this section, we construct the Drinfeld double D(H) for a nite Hopf algebra H with
C
H,H
= C
1
H,H
in the braided tensor category C. We show that (D(H), [b]) is quasi-
triangular.
Theorem 3.1 Let H and A be two bialgebras in C. Assume that is an invertible
skew pairing on H A and symmetric with respect to the braiding. If we dene =
( id )(id id C
H,A
id)(id C
H,A
)( ) and = ( id )(id
C
H,A
id id)(C
H,A
id)(), then the double cross product A
H, dened
in [16, P36]), of A and H is an algebra and a coalgebra. If A and H are Hopf algebras,
then A
H is
an algebra and a coalgebra. Observing the proof of [16, Theorem 1.5], we know that the
condition (M4) is not needed in the proof. Consequently, A
H has an antipode.
From [1, Proposition 3.6], we obtain our last assertion.
In this case, A
H can be written as A
)
op
and
= d
H
C
H,A
. Then (D(H), [b]) is a quasi-triangular Hopf algebra in C with [b] =
A
b
H
and D(H) = A
C
H,A
)(id id id C
H,H
id)(b) and (mm)(id C
D(H),D(H)
id)([b] ) =
(idmidid)(C
H,A
C
A,H
id)(ididmidid)(ididmididid)(idid
midididid)(idC
A,A
idSididid)(ididC
A,A
idididid)(id
C
A,A
ididid)(bididid)() = (idC
A,H
id)(idmidid)(C
A,A
C
H,A
id)(ididmidid)(ididC
H,H
C
H,A
)(idididC
H,H
id)(b).
Thus (QT3) holds.
In fact, there exists a very closed relation between the Drinfeld double D(H) dened
in Theorem 3.2 and the Drinfeld double D(H) dened in [3]. Since C
H
,H
: D(H) =
H
op
H D(H
op
) = H
op
d
H
|x|,|z|
= (x, z)v
|y||x|
|x|,|z|
= (id )(C
f,
f
id)(x y z).
5
Example 4.3 (see [9, Example 9.4.9]) The evaluation of the braided group analogue
H of an ordinary coquasi-triangular cocommutative Hopf algebra (H, r) is symmetric with
respect to braiding C
r
. In particular, the above conclusion holds for H = kG.
Proof. It is straightforward.
Example 4.4 Let H denote Lusztigs algebra
f. If A =
f
op
, then the bilinear map
as in Example 4.2 is a skew pairing on H A and symmetric with respect to the
braiding. Thus, by Theorem 3.1, A
= M
n
(R) as algebras in (C, C)
in the following three cases:
(i) (C, C) is the braided tensor category (
B
M, C
R
) determined by the quasi-triangular
structure R;
(ii) (C, C) is the braided tensor category (
B
M, C
r
) determined by the coquasi-triangular
structure r
(iii) (C, C) is the braided tensor category
B
B
YD or
B
YD
B
of Yetter-Drinfeld modules.
Example 4.6 (see [10] ) Let A denote the anyonic line algebra, i.e., A = C{x}/x
n
,
where C{x} is a free algebra over the complex eld C and x
n
is an ideal generalized
by x
n
of C{x}. Set C[] = C{x}/x
n
with
n
= 0. Its comultiplication, counit, and
antipode are
() = 1 + 1 , () = 0, and S() = ,
respectively. It is straightforward to check that H is an anyonic Hopf algebra. Let H
denote the braided group analogue CZ
n
of CZ
n
. Since CZ
n
is commutative, we have
C
CZn,CZn
= C
1
CZn,CZn
. Let H act on A trivially. By Corollary 4.5, we have
(C[]#CZ
n
)#(CZ
n
)
= M
n
(C[]) as algebras in (
CZ
n
M, C
r
).
By the way, we also have that the Drinfeld double of CZ
n
is quasi-triangular in
(
CZ
n
M, C
r
) with the quasi-triangular structure [b].
6
Acknowledgement The author thanks the referee and the editor for valuable sug-
gestions.
References
[1] Y. Bespalov and B.Drabant, Cross product bialgebras, I, J. algebra, 219 (1999),
466505.
[2] R. J. Blattner and S. Montgomery, A duality theorem for Hopf module algebras, J.
algebra, 95 (1985), 153172.
[3] H.X.Chen, Quantum double in monoidal categories, Comm.Algebra, 28 (2000)5,
23032328.
[4] V. G. Drinfeld, Quantum groups, in Proceedings International Congress of Mathe-
maticians, August 3-11, 1986, Berkeley, CA pp. 798820, Amer. Math. Soc., Prov-
idence, RI, 1987.
[5] G.Lusztig, Introduction to Quantum Groups, Progress on Math., Vol.110,
Birkhauser, Berlin, 1993.
[6] L.Li and P.Zhang, Twisted Hopf algebras, Ringel-Hall algebras and Greens ca
tegories, J.Algebra, 231(2000), P713743.
[7] S. Majid, Physics for algebraists: Non-commutative and non-cocommutative Hopf
algebras by a bicrossproduct construction, J.Algebra 130 (1990), 1764.
[8] S. Majid, Algebras and Hopf algebras in braided categories, Lecture notes in pure
and applied mathematics advances in Hopf algebras, Vol. 158, edited by J. Bergen
and S. Montgomery, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1994, 55105.
[9] S. Majid, Foundations of Quantum Group Theory, Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, 1995.
[10] S. Majid and M.J. Rodriguez Piaza, Random walk and the heat equation on super-
space and anyspace, J. Math. Phys., 35(1994) 7, 37533760.
[11] S. Montgomery, Hopf Algebras and Their Actions on Rings. CBMS Number 82,
AMS, Providence, RI, 1993.
[12] D. E. Radford, Minimal quasi-triangular Hopf algebras, J. algebra, 157 (1993),
281315.
[13] S. Stratila, Modular Theory in Operator Algebras, Editura Academiei and Abacus
Press, Bucuresti, 1981.
[14] M.E.Sweedler, Hopf Algebras, Benjamin, New York, 1969.
7
[15] M. Takeuchi, Finite Hopf algebras in braided tensor categories , J.Pure and Applied
Algebra, 138(1999), 59-82.
[16] Shouchuan Zhang, Hui-Xiang Chen, The double bicrossproducts in braided tensor
categories, Communications in Algebra, 29(2001)1, P3166.
8
5 Appendix
We denote the multiplication, comutiplication, antipode , braiding and inverse braiding
by
,
_
,
S
, and , respectively . In particular,
we denote C
U,V
by , for any U, V = H or H
.
The proof of Lemma2.4
Proof.
H#H
H#H
H
H
=
H H
H H
_ _
_
.
H H
=
H H
H H
__ _
_
H H
=
H H
H H
__
_
_
_
H H
and
9
H#H
H#H
H
H
=
H H
H H
_
_
H H
=
H H
H H
_
_
__
H H
=
H H
H H
_ _
_
__
H H
=
H H
H H
__
_
_
_
H H
=
H#H
H#H
H
H
.
Thus is an algebraic morphism.
Similarly, we can show that is an anti-algebraic morphism.
The proof of Theorem 2.5.
10
H#H
#H
H
H
=
H H
H
_
S
_
.
H
H
. ......(1)
We show (1) by following ve steps. It is easy to check the following (i) and (ii).
(i)
H#
H
H
#H
H
H
=
H#
H
H
#H
H
H
.
(ii)
H
#H
#
H
H
H
H
#H
#
H
H
H
.
11
(iii)
H
#
H
H
#
H
H
H
=
H
H
H
H
_
.
H
H
.
In fact,the right side =
H
H
H
H
_
_
_
_
_
H H
=
H
H
__
_
_
H H
#
H
H
H
=
H
H
H
H
_
S
.
H
H
.
The right side
by (iii)
=
H
H
H
H
_
S
.
_
.
H
H
=
H
H
H
H
_
_
_
S
_
_
H H
13
=
H H
__
_
S
__
H H
=
H H
_
_
H H
and
the left side =
H
H
H
H
_
_
H H
=
H H
_
_
H H
.
Thus (iv) holds.
(v)
H
#H
H
#H
H
H
H
H
H
H
_
.
H
H
.
14
In fact, the right side =
H
H
H
H
_
_
_
_
H H
=
H
H
__
_
_
H H
and
the left side =
H
H
_
H H
=
H
H
_
__
H H
15
=
H
H
_
_
__
H H
=
H
H
__
_
_
`
H H
#
H
H
#H
H
H
16
by (v)
=
H#
H
H
H
#
H
H
H
_
.
H
H
by (i)(ii)
=
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
_
.
H
H
17
by (iv)
=
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
_
.
S
.
H
H
by Lemma1.4
=
H H
H
_
.
S
.
H
H
18
=
H H
H
_ _
S
.
H
H
w
H#H
=
H
S
.
1
H#H
and
R
R
=
R
R
=
R
_
.
R
, where b
= C
H,H
b
H
.
We dene
R (H#H
(R#H)#H
=
R H H
w
_
.
R H H
and
(R#H)#H
R (H#H
)
=
R H H
w
_
.
R H H
.
19
We see that
=
R H#H
S
.
w
.
R H#H
since w is algebraic
=
R H#H
_
_
.
S
.
R H#H
=
R H#H
__
w
.
R H#H
=
R H#H
_
_
.
w
R H#H
=
R H#H
R H#H
.
Similarly, we have = id. Thus is invertible.
Now we show that is algebraic.
Let
(R#H)#H
R (H
H
)
=
R
H
H#H
S
.
R H
H
.
It is clear that = (id
1
)
is alegebraic.
20
Let
R
R (H
H
)
=
R
H
S
.
R H
H
.
We have that
(R#H)#H
R (H
H
)
=
R H#H
R H
H
.
We claim that
H H
R
.
R H
H
=
H H
R
_
R H
H
. ......()
21
the left side =
H H
R
H
.
S
.
R H
H
by Lemma1.5(1)
=
H H
R
H
S
.
_ _
S
.
R H
H
22
=
H H
R
H
S
.
S
.
R H
H
=
H H
S
.
H
.
R H
H
23
=
H H
R
_
S
_
H
.
R H
H
=
H H
S
_
H
.
R H
H
=
H H
R
_
.
S
.
H
.
R H
H
=
H H
R
_
.
R H
H
=
H H
R
_
.
R H
H
.
Thus relation (*) holds.
24
Next, we check that is algebraic. We see that
R R
R (H
H
)
=
R R
S
_
H
_
H
.
R H
H
=
R R
H
.
R H
H
=
R R
R (H
H
)
and obviously
R (H
H
)
=
R(H
H
)
R (H
H
)
.
Thus is algebraic.
Now we show that
is algebraic.
(R#H)#H
(R#H)#H
R (H
H
)
=
R H H
R H H
R H
H
25
=
R H H
R H H
R H
H
by (*)
=
R H H
R H H
_
.
R H
H
by Lemma1.4
=
R H H
R H H
_
_
.
R H
H
since is algebraic
=
R H H
R H H
_
_
.
R H
H
=
(R#H)#H
(R#H)#H
R (H
H
)
.
It is clear that
(R#H)#H
_
R (H
H
)
=
R(H
H
)
R (H
H
)
.
Thus
is algebraic.
26
The proof of Lemma3.2.
D(H)
_
cop
_
[b]
D(H) D(H)
=
A H
__
_
_
_
_
_
.
A H A H
=
A H
__
_
_
_
_
_
.
A H A H
=
A H
_ __
_
_
A H A H
=
A H
___
A H A H
27
and
D(H)
_
[b]
_
D(H) D(H)
=
A H
_
b
__
_
_
_
_
.
A H A H
=
A H
_
__
__
_
_
.
A H A H
=
A H
__
__
_
A H A H
=
A H
___
A H A H
.
Thus
D(H)
_
cop
_
[b]
D(H) D(H)
=
D(H)
_
[b]
_
D(H) D(H)
.
28
We complete the proof.
Remark: If U and V have left dual U
and V
, respectively, then U
V
and V
U
both are the left duals of U V . Their evaluations and coevaluations are
d
UV
= (d
U
d
V
)(id
U
C
V
,U
id
V
), b
UV
= (id
U
(C
V,U
)
1
id
V
)(b
U
b
V
);
d
UV
= d
V
(id
V
d
U
id
V
), b
UV
= (id
U
b
V
id
U
)b
U
,
respectively. In this paper, we use the second. H