Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Improving Outpatient access and provider productivity by review appointments
Improving Outpatient access and provider productivity by review appointments
Improving Outpatient access and provider productivity by review appointments
Offering sufficient access to healthcare services can present numerous challenges, especially in the arenas
of availability, convenience, and affordability.
◦ The purpose of these project is To deliver a specialist opinion to support the diagnosis and management
of conditions, or oversee management in more complex patients, preventing admissions.by making pre-
appointment reminder are made and rescheduling within a week.
Problem of statement
In our hospital There are problems found in appointment attendance and Outpatient
services which include: Long queues at Hospital's reception desk, long waiting time
at outpatient services, A waste of valuable resources Patients who miss
appointments have poorer health outcomes and increase costs for medical care,
Unordered appointment schedules due to lack of coordination between various
recommendations, and decreasing the annual revenue loss at the end of 2023
Project objectives
◦ To establish demand and capacity for clinics
◦ To review the patient pathway in order to reduce delays
◦ To review access and booking processes
◦ To review current ways of working
◦ To review clinical pathway criteria and discharge protocols
◦ To improve access to diagnostics
◦ To improve provision of tests and diagnostics from primary care
◦ To improve the patient experience
◦ To pilot changes in service and evaluate for wider implementation
What to be improve in access of outpatient healthcare service
Methodologies of the project
Model for Improvement
What are we trying to accomplish?
Act Plan
Study Do
Fishbone Diagram
People/staff
Inadequate
Shortage of clinicians Policies and standard
knowledge
& training of Poor communication
workforce No standard for appointment
and poorly managed
No value based care
Absence of patient flow
employee Poor medical literacy No scheduled process
of engagement Shortage of hospital budget
$$
Improving Patient Access to
Inappropriate hospital Healthcare on specialty clinic
size with services Cost burden Poor mgt, Rx and Dx
of disease
unnecessary referrals to specialists
Poor documentation of
Lack of transportation Difficulty in rescheduling
Long waiting time
Evaluation complete
Review data Report complete and
To determine
Project Evaluate outcomes presented to appropriate
outcomes of Post Pilot
evaluation Determine satisfaction stakeholders
project
Compile report Examine potential rollout of
changes to other services
PDSA cycles
Plan Do Study Act
PDS Understand Discussed with GP what the Predictions met. Change in system is Find out more about
A 1 appointment appointment system was like introduction of shorter, pre-bookable day-to-day use of
system in a before, what changes have been ‘review’ appointments. system (observation
meeting with GP. made and the reasons behind and interviews with
the changes. admin staff).
PDS Admin staff Non-participant observation to Facilitators and barriers of the Collect data to see if
A 2 interviews and understand how the appointment system established, administrative staff
non participant appointment system works. opinions on online and review pre- workload has
observation of Admin staff interviews to bookable appointments. decreased as predicted,
the appointment understand their opinions on Flow chart, cause and effect diagram to complement the
system in use. the system. and a driver diagram of the system findings from
made. interviews and
Predictions met—admin staff-like observation periods.
review appointments.
Cont…
P Collect data on Data collected on number Prediction not met —number Collect post-intervention data
D administrative staff of calls received by the of calls remained the same on whether patient demand
S workload. Predictions were practice 4 weeks pre- pre-intervention and post- for appointments is being met
A that workload had intervention and 4 weeks intervention. Conducted test or not.
3 decreased. post-intervention to determine statistical Collect pre-intervention and
significance of result. post-intervention data about
Monday was busiest day. clinician workload.
Run chart created.
P Collect data to determine Data collected on the Predictions met—patient Collect pre-intervention and
D whether the intervention percentage (%) of patients demand is close to the target post-intervention data about
S met patient demand for phoning between 08:00 with 93% of patients clinician workload.
A appointments. Prediction and 09:00 who receive an receiving an appointment
4 was that patient demand is ‘on the day’ appointment. when they phone for one
being met. between 08:00 and 09:00.
Cont…
PD Collect data on clinician Data collected on the Predictions met—there Collect data on the
SA workload pre-intervention number of appointments was a 43% increase in the clinicians’ opinions on the
5 and post-intervention. available per day pre- number of GP intervention, including the
Prediction was that there intervention and post- appointments available in increased number of GP
was an increase in number intervention, and the weekly the practice. appointments available and
of GP appointments staff rotation of the GPs. shorter consultation time
available. for review appointments.
Do
◦ Test your change ideas one at a time
◦ Use Run chart to monitor your QI project over time.
Study
◦ Describe the measured results and how they compared to the predictions and baseline
Act
◦ Here describe what modifications to the plan will be made for the next cycle from what you learned (Adapt,
Adopt, Abandon)