1/3/2019 Optimizing Wireless Microphone Systems for the Real World, Pt.

1 - Sound Forums

Optimizing Wireless Microphone Systems for the Real

World, Pt. 1
April 30, 2011

In today’s sound reinforcement, broadcast, and even recording landscapes, wireless microphones and
IEMs are a heavily-used tool. Cleaner stages, freedom of movement and mobility are all possible
because of wireless technology. This series of articles aims to provide readers with some of the basics
involved with getting the most out of your wireless systems. Experience shows that proper planning,
system design and some audio basics go a long way towards success in this area. Frankly, if you’re
having trouble with your wireless mics, it is not a matter of VooDoo, black magic, or the fluorescent
lights – it is more likely good, old-fashioned interference.

Gain Structure

Let’s start with the basics – these are the things that apply to any wireless system, no matter how big
or small. First off, gain structure is very important with wireless microphones in order to get the best
sound. There is another benefit though – better range. When you are properly modulating the RF
carrier (the actual transmission signal) the receiver has more to “lock onto” and thus your range
improves.

So here are the steps towards setting the proper gain structure. First,
start with the transmitter itself. If it is a handheld microphone, make
sure it has the capsule on it that you plan to use. Next, ideally you’ll
want the person using it to give you their vocal level – either
speaking or singing – not the “rehearsal” level, but the real
performance level if you can talk them into it. Or, if the performer or
speaker is not available, use your best judgment and simulate what
you think the talent will do.

What you want is to bump into the limiter on peaks. How this will be indicated differs with different
manufacturers, but you should basically see that your audio signal fills up the available range and, on
peaks, gets a red light to light up or some other kind of indication that your are out of dynamic range.
All analog wireless units have a limiter in the signal path to prevent over-modulation, as specified by

https://soundforums.net/articles/optimizing-wireless-microphone-systems-for-the-real-world-pt-1-190626/ 1/3
1/3/2019 Optimizing Wireless Microphone Systems for the Real World, Pt. 1 - Sound Forums

the FCC. Digital wireless units are different – they may not have a limiter. Still – it is important to get
a good audio signal at the transmitter.

For body packs, connect the microphone element you intend to use – either a lavaliere mic, ear-worn,
or headset. If it is a guitar pack, use the instrument cable and the guitar, bass or other instrument
that will be used in performance. Again, what you want to see is full audio modulation with peak
signals triggering the limiter.
As with any gain structure setup, you have now optimized your signal-to-noise in the
transmitter/receiver system. Next comes the receiver. Ideally, you’ll want to connect the receiver to
the mixing console with a line level input.

Many consoles only offer a line input as a 1/4″ TRS jack, so you may want to make or buy a custom
cable for this purpose. It is OK to use a mic input, but you will sacrifice a small amount of signal to
noise, on the order of 3dB. The reason for this is that you will need to pad down your wireless
receiver output (usually by 40 dB) then re-boost it using the mic preamp. A slight amount of noise is
added in this process. For lower-quality mic preamps, you may lose more than 3dB – perhaps up to
6dB or more. Nevertheless, some engineers like to use the mic preamp for the wireless mic input for
the way that it affects the sound. We won’t get into matters of taste here.

Assuming you are connected to a line level input on your mixer, your wireless receiver should be set
at 0dB (no attenuation). This combination of transmitter setup and receiver to mixer connection
should yield the signal with the lowest amount of noise and distortion. Note that some digital wireless
mic systems do not have level adjustments at the transmitter or receiver. In such cases, you may
need to boost the signal at the mixer by some amount, depending on the original source level at the
transmitter microphone.

Transmitter Placement

Let’s get one thing out of the way right now: handheld microphone placement matters. If you are in a
corporate AV setting, it is to your advantage to coach the speaker (I don’t care if he or she is a CEO,
General, or just an HR droid) to hold the dang microphone up to their mouth! This is all about gain
before feedback, people. I’m sure as a sound professional, you already know this. But in my
experience, these people do not. I think everyone who speaks publicly should have to go through
microphone boot camp where there is a drill sergeant screaming “HOLD THE MICROPHONE UP TO
https://soundforums.net/articles/optimizing-wireless-microphone-systems-for-the-real-world-pt-1-190626/ 2/3
1/3/2019 Optimizing Wireless Microphone Systems for the Real World, Pt. 1 - Sound Forums

YOUR MOUTH, YOU MAGGOT!!!” OK, rant over. But it is a pretty big deal. Again, if you don’t have a
good solid audio signal going in, you will have noise and potentially more interference, not to mention
good, old-fashioned feedback.

The more subtle art involves placement of the bodypack transmitter. One thing to keep in mind is that
you don’t want the antenna to contact skin or even a sweaty shirt. My colleague Joe Ciaudelli at
Sennheiser always suggests clipping the transmitter to the talent’s belt so the antenna is pointing
down. Not all transmitters allow this, but most do. You also want to place the transmitter so it is not
distracting to the talent – usually this means on the back of their belt or pants. It is not great to put it
in their pocket, but in some situations, this is all you’ll get.

Keeping the antenna away from the skin or sweaty shirt can also be accomplished with tricks such as
a piece of gaff tape covering their shirt just under the antenna. James Stoffo has suggested using a
length of plastic tubing such as from an aquarium. I’ve seen techs use a piece of large shrink tubing
that is shrunk over the antenna connector and then again at the tip to “seal” the antenna in a volume
of air. Whatever works for you – do it. Otherwise, a very large percentage, perhaps most of your RF
signal from the transmitter will be absorbed – this cuts your range and invites interference.

That’s it for now. Stay tuned for antenna systems (part 2) and frequency coordination (part 3).

Karl Winkler
http://lectrosonics.com

https://soundforums.net/articles/optimizing-wireless-microphone-systems-for-the-real-world-pt-1-190626/ 3/3