Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SOLUTION JUN 2018
SOLUTION JUN 2018
SOLUTION JUN 2018
SUGGESTED SOLUTION
1
FAR510 – JUNE 2018
Current Assets:
Inventory (119,300-1,350) √117,950
Trade and other receivables √ 90,000
207,950
497,843.5
Equity:
Share Capital 125,000
Retained Earnings √ 157,156
Other reserves 24,700
Non-Current Liabilities:
Deferred gain (170-42.5-42.5) √√85
Finance lease creditor (1850+185-600-456.5) √√√978.5
Loan from commercial bank √50,000
Deferred tax liability √15,300
Current Liabilities
Deferred gain √ 42.5
Trade and other payables (96,375+20,000-9,500-500) √√√106,375
Finance lease creditor (600-143.5) √√456.5
Tax payable (42,000- 30,000) √12,000
Bank overdraft (5,000-10,000-600+1,850-2000) √√√5,750
497,843.5
(√22)
2
FAR510 – JUNE 2018
Plant &
Land Building
Note to Property, Plant & Equip Equipment
RM’000 RM’000 RM’000
Balance as at 1 Jan 2017 √50,000 155,000 120,000
Elimination of Acc Depn √(25,000)
Surplus/(Deficit) on revaluation √25,000 √(32,500)
Disposal √(2,100)
Acquisition: leased assets √1,850
Acquisition: new assets √20,000
Balance as at 31 December 2017 75,000 97,500 139,750
Acc. Depreciation:
Balance as at 1 Jan 2017 25,000 48,000
Elimination of AD √(25,000) √(420)
Charge for the year √3,250 √16,526.5
(√11)
(60 x 0.5 = 30 marks)
Workings:
Land: RM
CA as at 1/1/17 50,000
FV 75,000
Surplus 25,000
Building
Bal as at 1/1/17 155,000
Accumulated Depreciation (25,000)
CA 130,000
Fair value 97,5000
Deficit 32,500
Dr Land 25,000
Cr SOPL 300
Cr ARR/OCI 24,700
Dr ARR 28,125
Dr SOPL 4,375
Cr Building 32,500
3
FAR510 – JUNE 2018
RM’000 RM’000
Dr Bank 1,850
Dr Acc Dep 420
Cr PPE 2,100
Cr Deferred gain 170
Dr Deferred gain 42.5
Cr Amortisation of deferred gain (SOPL) 42.5
RM’000 RM’000
Dr Machine (200,000/10) 20,000
Cr Acc payable 20,000
Dr Depreciation (RM20,000/10) 2,000
Cr Acc dep 2,000
Dr Acc payable (95,000/10) 9,500
Dr Exchange Loss 500
Cr Bank (95,000,000/9.5) 10,000
Dr Acc payable 500
Cr Exchange gain (105,000/10) –(105,000/10.5) 500
QUESTION 2
Each floor of the building cannot be sold separately so the company has to assess which is
more significant. √ If the owner-occupied is insignificant√ then the building can be classified as
an investment property√ based on MFRS140√. If the owner occupied is significant√ then the
building can be classified as PPE√ based on MFRS116√. In this case, the owner-occupied is
significant, √ therefore it should be classified as PPE√ based on MFRS116√.
4
FAR510 – JUNE 2018
b.
Construction cost RM 4,250,000 /
Borrowing cost
YE 2016 (Oct – Dec) 3m x 7% x 3/12 = 52,500 //
Less: Investment income 1.5m x 5% x 3/12 = (18,750) //
YE 2017 (Jan-31 Jan) 3m x 7% x 1/12 = 17,500 /
Less: Investment income 1.5m x 5% x 1/12 = (6,250) //
As at 31/12/2017 NCAHFS should be measured at the lower√ of CA & FVLCTS.√ The CA was
RM2,370,000√√√√ and FVLCTS was RM2,090,000√√. It should be measured at
RM2,090,000√. Since the CA higher than the FVLCTS, there is an impairment loss√ of
RM280,000√ transferred to SOPL. √
Working: RM
1/7/17 CA 2,000,000
Renovation 400,000
2,400,000
30/9/17 Depreciation 2,400,000/20 x 3/12 = (30,000)
CA 2,370,000
FVLCTS (2,200,000-110,000) (2,090,000)
Impairment loss 280,000
(20 x 0.5 = 10 marks)
QUESTION 3
5
FAR510 – JUNE 2018
b. Pappan Bhd can adopt revaluation model for all its intangible assets only if:-
i. There is an active market for the intangible assets.
ii. Revaluations will be made with such regularity that at the end of the reporting period
the carrying amount of the asset does not differ materially from its fair value.
iii. Entire class of intangible assets must adopt the revaluation model
iv. unless there is no active market for those intangible assets.
v. Fair value can be measured reliably.
(5 x 1 = 5)
c. The cost of the purchased customer lists amounted to RM350,000 can be recognized as an
intangible assets√ in accordance to MFRS 138√ and amortised√ over 5 years.√ The cost of
the purchased customer lists met the criteria of identifiability, √ control√ and future economic
benefits. √ However, if it is internally generated by the company, RM350,000 cannot be
recognised as an intangible assets√ and need to be expense off in the SOPL.√ Internally
generated customer list cannot be distinguished from the cost of developing the business as
a whole. √
(10 x 0.5 = 5 marks)
d. The cost incurred during research phase√ from January till Feb 2017 cannot be capitalized
√and should be written off to SOPL as expenses in the period they are incurred. √ This is
because during the research phase there is no certainty of future economic benefit will flow
to the entity. √ Even though development phase begins on March 2017 the cost incurred
cannot be capitalized till Aug 2017√ as it did not meet the recognition criterias of MFRS 138.
√
However, the capitalization may start from Sept 2017√ when management is confident on
the acceptance of the product to be sold√. There is a probable future economic benefits that
will flow to the entity√. Total cost of (RM100,000+RM30,000) RM130,000√√ need to be
capitalized in the SOPF√ and amortised√ based on the useful life of 10 years√ once the
product has been launched √.
(20 x 0.5 = 10 marks)
6
FAR510 – JUNE 2018
QUESTION 4
Emerald Bhd
Statement of cash flows for the year ended 31 Dec 2017
RM‘000 RM‘000
Cash flows from operating activities
7
FAR510 – JUNE 2018
Workings
W1
Taxation
tax recov (b/d) /475
Cash 1,875 SOPL / 1,950
Deferred tax /100
Tax recov (c/d) 500
W2
Interest
Cash 622 b/d 100
c/d / 108 SOPL / 630
W3
Property plant equipment
Bal b/d 26,270 Disposal (250-125) /125
Finance lease /500 Depn /1,975
ARR /2,500
SOPL /1,000
Cash 375 Bal c/d 28,545
W4
Disposal of equipment
PPE (250-125) //125 Cash 115
SOPL –Loss /10
W5
Retained Profit
Dividend paid 6,530 b/d /7,505
c/d /6,570 SOPL /5,595
W6
Finance lease
Cash 363 b/d (900+110) / 1,010
c/d (1000+147) 1,147 Equipment / 500
40 /x 1/2 = 20 marks
(Total: 20 marks)
END OF SOLUTION