Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ArticleReview
ArticleReview
cross-sectional study
Authors: Mesfin Tadese, Alex Yeshaneh & Getaneh Baye Mulu
Year: 2022
II. Methodology
The cross-sectional study was undertaken at the Hawassa University in December 2020 with
the overall purpose to assess academic performance among 21, 579 students enrolled in the
university. The study assumed an amplifier of 0. 05%, which when cross multiplied by two
resulted in a sample size of 659 through the Open Epi software. The data were collected by
using structured questionnaires adopted into Amharic language; the validation was done
through back translation with high quality standard. Data analysis entailed Descriptive
statistics, Chi-Square tests and logistic regression presenting Odds Ratio in assessing
academic success and its predictors while the following variables were considered significant
predictors of an outcome meeting Chi-Square test of significance of the study at p-value <0.
05. Despite of that established study strengths, research limitation, like recall bias and
inability to determine causations because of cross sectional study design implies the need to
replicate studies with longitudinal research to provide efficient temporal relationships.
The study also sought to establish the factors that affect students’ performance in their studies
and it was found that overall 7 out of every 10-student got good grades in their studies in
Hawassa University. A cut off point was obtained for age, faculty type, and cigarette smoking
with academic performance. Non-smoking students had better academic performance than
smoking student, which corroborated the other global studies which revealed the negative
impacts of smoking on education and health. Test also had its peculiarities, specifically the
scores of 20-24 years old students were not as high as those of the 25-29 years old students,
where the increase in the age ratio contributed to the outcome. It can be highlighted that the
students of medical and health sciences appeared to perform better academically compared to
the students of other fields, which corresponds to the international researches focusing on the
high academic standards and the intrinsic motivation in the medical field. That aside,
limitations include possible endogeneity biases from self-Administered data and the
sectionality of the study that cannot explain cause effects relationships thus needing more
longitudinal study to corroborate these findings as well as to examine effects of other
institutional factors on academic results.