Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Engm041 Unit 8
Engm041 Unit 8
In this unit, the effect of geometry and external actions on elements is considered.
Now consider a column which is thinner in one direction and again subject to increasing
axial load.
When the load reaches a certain value, the column begins to bend sideways about the
weaker axis. The column is said to have buckled. Increasing the load causes the column
to deflect further until bending failure occurs.
The effect of the sideways deflection is to increase the moment at any section by an
amount equal to the axial load x deflection at the section :-
Madditional = Na
In most practical situations the effect of deflections are small so can be ignored. Where it
is significant, the element is described as being slender.
When we consider a perfect column at first sight it ought not to buckle when subject to
vertical loads. However Euler, a theoretical engineer from Switzerland, discovered that
there is a critical load Ncr, now called the Euler load when a column is in a state of
neutral equilibrium. When the load is less the column is stable, when the load is above
the critical load the column becomes unstable and starts to buckle. The formula for the
critical load is :-
2 EI
N cr
L2
Thus a column is more likely to buckle if the length is increased or the flexural rigidity
(EI) is reduced. π2 indicates the deflected shape will be sinusoidal.
Classification of structures.
Braced structure. This is a structure which contains bracing elements. These are
usually vertical elements often walls which are so stiff relative to other vertical elements,
that they may be assumed to attract almost all the horizontal forces. With braced
structures, sidesway of the structure is insignificant. A braced structure is defined as one
in which the bracing element(s) attract and transmit to the foundations, at least 90% of all
horizontal forces applied to the structure.
Unbraced structure. This type of structure relies on the frame to transmit horizontal
loads to the foundations. In unbraced structures sidesway is significant, meaning that
lateral displacement of the ends of the columns increases the critical design moments by
more than 10% above that calculated by ignoring the displacements.
The classification of a structure determines the mode of deflection of the structure which
gives very different bending moments in the columns. In both a braced and unbraced
frame all columns in a particular storey height are subject to nearly the same deflection,
due to the stiffness of the floors.
a a
The effective length of a column is defined as the equivalent length of a pin-ended strut
subject to the same load and of identical cross section.
Effective length l0 = βl where l is the clear height between end restraints. The effective
length depends on the deflected shape of the element and the end restraints and is the
distance between points of contraflexure.
Braced structure. If the end supports are fixed, two points of contraflexure exist
between the supports and the theoretical effective length is 0.5l0 (β=0.5). If both ends are
pinned β =1.0
l Points of l0
contraflexure l0
N N
Braced – fixed ends Braced – pinned ends
Unbraced structure. Only one point of contraflexure exists between the element ends.
If both ends are fully restrained, β = 1, if the top end free, β =2.0. In the example below,
fixity has been judged as being intermediate between fully fixed and pinned.
N
Virtual point of
contraflexure
N This section
will behave
as a pin
sidesway ended strut
Point of
contraflexure
N
Un braced N
Clause 5.8.3.2 (2) – (7) gives guidance on determining the effective length of „isolated‟
members. These are members that for the purposes of design need to be designed in
isolation.
(2) For a general definition of the effective length, see 5.8.1. Examples of effective length
for isolated members with constant cross section are given in Figure 5.7.
(3) For compression members in regular frames, the slenderness criterion (see 5.8.3.1)
should be checked with an effective length l0 determined in the following way:
k1 k2
l 0 0.5l 1 1 (5.15)
0.45 k1 0.45 k 2
kk k k
l0 l max 1 10 1 2 ; 1 1 1 2 (5.16)
k1 k 2 1 k1 1 k 2
where:
k1, k2 are the relative flexibilities of rotational restraints at ends 1 and 2 respectively:
k = (θ / M)∙ (EΙ / l).
Note: k = 0 is the theoretical limit for rigid rotational restraint, and k = ∞ represents the limit for no
restraint at all. Since fully rigid restraint is rare in practise, a minimum value of 0,1 is recommended for k1
and k2. [The concrete centre recommend that when θ = 0 then k =0, but a rigid rotational restraint is
unlikely in practice so take k = 0.1.]
(5) In the definition of effective lengths, the stiffness of restraining members should
include the effect of cracking, unless they can be shown to be uncracked in ULS.
(6) For other cases than those in (2) and (3), e.g. members with varying normal force
and/or cross section, the criterion in 5.8.3.1 should be checked with an effective length
based on the buckling load (calculated e.g. by a numerical method):
l0 EI / N B (5.17)
where:
EI is a representative bending stiffness
NB is buckling load expressed in terms of this EI
(in Expression (5.14), i should also correspond to this EI)
(7) The restraining effect of transverse walls may be allowed for in the calculation of the
effective length of walls by the factor β given in 12.6.5.1. In Expression (12.9) and Table
12.1, lw is then substituted by l0 determined according to 5.8.3.2.
Full detailed analysis is necessary in order to obtain θ, but when this is not known k1 and
k2 can be determined from the ratio of column bending stiffnesses to beam - slab bending
stiffnesses but taking only 50% of beam stiffness to allow for cracking. Only columns
fully framed into the column in the direction of bending should be considered.
SC1
k1
S1 S2 S1 S 2
SC1 l
SC1 SC2
k2
S3 S4 S3 S 4
SC2 l
A simplified method of determining the effective length of columns using factors is given
in “How to design concrete structures using Eurocode 2 : Columns” – Moss R and
Brooker O, The Institution of Structural engineers. Conservative effective length factors
are given in the table below where l0 = l x factor.
Slenderness Ratio.
Radius of gyration.
i = (I/A)0.5
Example. If the effective length of a column is 2.63m and it is 350mm square, what is
its slenderness ratio?
= 101.04 mm
In the example above, a 350mm square column of length 2.63m has a slenderness ratio λ
of 26. To examine the effect of slenderness consider this 350mm square column but of
different lengths. Column is simply supported top and bottom
Slenderness ratio 1.
Apply an axial load Ned at an eccentricity of eo. Moment on column = Ned eo. Actually
there will be a very small additional moment due to the deflection induced in the column
by Ned but this is almost 0 in this case. The load carrying capacity of the column is
unaffected by the eccentric load and resultant deflection. The axial load and moment are
plotted on the figure below.
Buckling deflection.
For a range of slenderness ratios (column lengths) the buckling deflection is included as a
factor in the load carrying capacity of the columns. The buckling deflection produces an
additional moment in the column, NEde2 which reduces the load carrying capacity of the
column. The greater the slenderness the greater the reduction.
NEd
e2 e0
λ=1
λ=10
λ=25
λ=90
Axial load NEd
λ=200
Design Consideration.
Clearly design decisions need to be made to ensure that the slenderness or second order
effects as they are sometimes called are included when necessary but not when
unnecessary. According to the figure above, the effects of slenderness ratio λ on axial
load NEd is limited if λ < 25 but becomes important if λ > 90. The challenge for
designers is to decide at what value of λ should slenderness effects be included in the
design process.
The code states that second order slenderness effects can be ignored if they are less than
10% of the first order effects or as an alternative, for an isolated member if it slenderness
ratio λ is less than λlim . Details on this requirement can be found in Clause 5.8.3.1 which
follows :-
(1) As an alternative to 5.8.2 (6), second order effects may be ignored if the slenderness λ
(as defined in 5.8.3.2) is below a certain value λlim.
Note: The value of λlim for use in a Country may be found in its National Annex. The recommended value
follows from:
If the end moments M01 and M02 give tension on the same side, rm should be taken positive (i.e. C ≤ 1,7),
otherwise negative (i.e. C > 1,7).
(2) In cases with biaxial bending, the slenderness criterion may be checked separately for
each direction. Depending on the outcome of this check, second order effects (a) may be
ignored in both directions, (b) should be taken into account in one direction, or (c) should
be taken into account in both directions. The section on bi-axial bending deals with this.
If rm is not known, C may be taken as 2.7 for columns in double curvature in braced
structures through to 0.7 for constant moment as indicated in the Figure below. For
unbraced structures, C = 0.7.
x x x
x x
If the above checks (i.e. λlim ≥ λ) indicate that slenderness effects cannot be ignored, then
slenderness needs to be designed for. In these cases, the effects of cracking, creep, non-
linear material properties and geometric imperfections are also to be considered. This
normally means that in addition to slenderness effects accounted for through the
eccentricity e2, an additional eccentricity ei of the axial load Ned is included which allows
for the other effects. The code defines ei as
ei = 0.5θil0
In this unit, the simplified method based on estimation of curvatures is used. This
method is recommended by the Concrete Centre.
A rigorous method of analysis will ascertain the load deflection relationship of a structure
which includes say slender columns. A simplified method must aim to find a close
estimate of this but for use in a design office.
The nominal curvature method recommended in the code aims to predict the deflection at
which failure of the concrete commences. i.e. when maximum compressive strain occurs
in the concrete. This will usually represent the actual failure moment and axial load of
the column but may in certain circumstances represent a lower load on the rising branch
of the N – M curve where two solutions are possible from the curve.
The diagram indicates that the strain limits for concrete change from εc3 when the column
is predominantly subject to compressive forces to εcu3 when bending becomes significant.
See unit 6 [EC2 Clause 6.1, Figure 6.1], unit 7 and the following figure.
Both concrete
and steel at
maximum strains
Moment MEd
The deflection of a pin ended strut is calculated using the curvature but this varies along
the length of the element. If a central deflection represented by βl02(1/r) is assumed, then
when β = 1/10 is selected a close approximation to the actual deflection is achieved and
this value has been selected by EC2.
So e2 = 0.1 l02(1/r)
Derivation of above.
1/rud = 0
Axial load
Nud 1/r
Balance point
NEd
Nbal
MEd
0.0035
Curvature of section at balance point :-
= change in strain over the depth
d 1/rbal = (0.0035 + fyd/Es)/d
εyd = fyd/Es
d Beam
dept
h
(0.0035 + fyd/Es)
The method then assumes the curvature varies linearly between 1/rud and 1/rbal so for any
load NEd the curvature can be expressed as :-
1/r = KrKφ(1/rbal)
Where:-
N ud N Ed
Kr 1
N ud N bal
The code uses a simplified expression for 1/rbal by assuming that for a balanced section
the neutral axis depth is 0.55d thus :-
f yd
1 / rbal yd / 0.45d
( E s 0.45d )
K 1 ef 1
Where :-
1. φ(∞,t0) ≤ 2
2. λ ≤ 75
3. M0Ed/Ned ≥ h
Where h is the cross sectional depth in the appropriate direction.
Where :-
φ is the effective creep ratio
λ is the slenderness ratio
M0Ed is the equivalent first order moment (May be taken as M0e)
Ned is the design value of applied axial force
The maximum moment MEd depends on e2 which in turn depends on Kr which can only
be calculated when the area of steel is known.
1. Assume Kr =1
2. Calculate MEd
3. Find area of steel required in column section for axial load NEd and moment MEd
4. Recalculate Kr
5. If this value of Kr differs significantly from the previous value return to 2.
210kNm
6m
60kNm
400mm square
d2 = 40mm
fck = 40MPa
fyk = 500MPa
θi = 1/200
Ignore creep i.e. φef = 0
k1 k2
So l 0 0.5l 1 1 (5.15)
0.45 k1 0.45 k 2
k1 k2
or 0.5 1 1
0.45 k1 0.45 k 2
S1 S2
SC1 l
SC1 SC 2
k1 k 2 1
S3 S4 S3 S 4
SC2 l
l0 = 0.845 x 6 = 5.07m
2. The slenderness ratio λ of the column and its slenderness limit λlim ?
= 5070/Radius of gyration
5000 1000
N Ed /( Ac f cd ) 1.38
400 400 0.85 40 / 1.5)
This is < 43.9 therefore the column must be designed for slenderness effects.
= 34.49Kr
Using chart for d2/h = 0.1 gives, (See Figure 15.5(b) unit 7
Kr = 0.31
Asfyk/(bhfck) = 0.60
Max As 0 0.04 x 400 x 400 = 6400 mm2 NOT actually permissible but gives the
method
Up to this point the treatment of slenderness effects has been concerned with unixial
bending. In this circumstance, the second order moments are in the same axis as the first
order moments. In reality, there are two other conditions that need to be considered.
1. First order moments about the major axis with second order effects about the
minor axis which is slender. The major axis may not be slender.
2. First order moments about both axes (bi-axial bending) . Either or both axes are
slender.
Step 2. If two orthogonal axes, y and z exist on the cross section and if
Step 3. If the checks in step 2 are not satisfied, then use Clause 5.8.9(4) [See unit 7].
Slender beams.
Where a beam is narrow either with respect to its span or its depth, there is a possibility
that it may fail by lateral buckling.
However the likely occurrence of such beams is relatively rare and so the code employs a
simple conservative check thus :-
For safety the code requires both the following conditions be met :-
Where :-
lot is the distance between torsional restraints
h is the total depth of the beam in the central part of lof
b is the width of the compression flange
Should these two conditions not be met, the code offers no further guidance.
1. Discuss how column slenderness affects design. In particular consider how lateral
deflection due to moments and lateral deflection due to imperfections affect
design.
2. Derive the curvature if a column.
3. λlim is used to determine if a column is slender or not. Examine the terms in this
expression and justify why A, B C and n are included.
4. Figure Q4 shows a column subject to axial load and moments about x-x. The
creep effects are unknown, additional moments due to curvature have been
evaluated as 50kNm and those due to imperfections are 135.2kNm. Assuming the
mechanical reinforcement ratio is not known at the design stage, determine the
following :
400mm
10m
x
60kNm d2 = 50mm
fyk = 500MPa
Concrete type C40/50
FIGURE Q4
5. Fig 1 shows a column subject to axial load and moments about the x-x. Effective
creep ratio φef = 2.0, additional moments due to curvature have been evaluated as 65kNm
and those due to imperfections need to be considered. Assuming the mechanical
reinforcement ratio is not known at the design stage. Design the main reinforcement for
the column.
10m
x
120kNm d2 = 50mm
fyk = 500MPa
θi = 1/100
FIGURE 1 Concrete type C40/50
Learning outcomes.
Question 4.
Figure 1 shows a column subject to axial load and moments about x-x. The creep effects
are unknown, additional moments due to curvature have been evaluated as 50kNm and
those due to imperfections are 135.2kNm. Assuming the mechanical reinforcement ratio
is not known at the design stage, determine the following :
10m
x
60kNm d2 = 50mm
fyk = 500MPa
Concrete type C40/50
FIGURE 1
If the end moments M01 and M02 give tension on the same side, rm should be taken
positive (i.e. C ≤ 1,7), otherwise negative (i.e. C > 1,7).
Solution.
λlim = 20ABC/η0.5
Design moments.
Moment at column centre = M0e + 50 + 135.2 = 287.2kNm
As = 1920mm2
Question 5.
Figure 1 shows a column subject to axial load and moments about the x-x. Effective
creep ratio φef = 2.0, additional moments due to curvature have been evaluated as 65kNm
and those due to imperfections need to be considered. Assuming the mechanical
reinforcement ratio is not known at the design stage. Design the main reinforcement for
the column. Use C40/50 concrete.
450mm
10m
x
120kNm d2 = 50mm
fyk = 500MPa
θi = 1/100
FIGURE 1 Concrete type C40/50
Solution.
λlim = 20ABC/η0.5
Design moments.
Moment at column centre = M0e + 65 + M(geometric imperfections) {65 represents
additional moments due to curvature}
As = 3366mm2
x
Cover to main bars
= 50 – 13 = 37mm
T25 T25
T25 T25
T25 T25
T25 T25
S = [450 – (4x25) – 74]/3
= 92 mm so OK
x