Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Munir AHmed Banglani Appeal Against Order u s 561 a CrPC_012419
Munir AHmed Banglani Appeal Against Order u s 561 a CrPC_012419
VERSUS
1. The State
2. Gul Hassan S/o Tagyal By Caste Banglani, r/o Village Dur Muhammad
Banglani PS Mubarakpur Taluka Thul District Jacobabd ----------------Respondents
Being aggrieved and dis satisfied with the order dated 27-06-2024 passed by the
learned I/C Consumer Protection Judge/JM Jacobabad where he has included/joined applicant
in the case to face the trial whereas the DSP/I.O complaint cell has submitted final investigation
report u/s 173 in crime No. 07/2024, PS Mubarakpur offences punishable u/s 302, 109, 506/2,
34 PPC with recommendation for trial of the offence, However the name of present
applicant/accused was kept in column No. 2 of the charge sheet with blue ink, meaning thereby
has intended that applicant be not tried for the alleged offence. That this Honourable court may
be pleased to set aside the impugned order dated 27-06-2024 passed the learned I/C Consumer
Protection Judge/JM Jacobabad and direct the learned Magistrate to accept the report as
recommended by I.O and also suspend its operation till final decision of this application on the
consideration of following facts and grounds:-
FACTS
On 21.02.2024, complainant Gul Hassan Bangulani, Lodged present FIR, which is
reproducing as under:-
Police after registration of FIR started investigation and after usual investigation
submitted the report in the court of learned magistrate while putting the name of present
applicant in column No. 2 of chargesheet but the I/C of learned Consumer Protection
Court/JM Jacobabad joined him as accused. Hence this application for 1st time.
GROUNDS
1. That prior to this no such application on behalf of the applicants was moved by the
undersigned before this Honourable Court.
3. That the impugned order dated 27-06-2024 passed by the I/C Learned Consumer
Protection Judge/JM Jacobabad is illegal, incorrect, erroneous and the same is liable to
be set aside on merits.
4. That learned Consumer Protection Court/JM Jacobabad without verifying real facts
presented by I.O in his final investigation report u/s 173 CrPC include the name of
present applicant in the case to face the trial.
1. That on the alleged date and time of incident present applicant was available in Saudi
Araabia for performing Umrah and was not available and was not present in Pakistan
when he was not physically available in Pakistan than how he participated in the
commission of offence and fired at deceased.
2. That as and when present applicant return back from Saudi Arabia he immediately
obtained protective bail than surrendered himself before the court of learned sessions
judge Jacobabad and submitted pre arrest bail application which was transferred to the
court of learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge Jacobabad where the pre arrest bail
application of present applicant was confirmed.
3. That present applicant after getting pre arrest bail joined the investigation so also trial
before the court of learned magistrate than I.O /DSP Complaint Cell submitted final
investigation report u/s 173 CrPC before the learned Consumer Protection Court/JM
Jacobabad where the name of present applicant/accused was kept in column No. 2 of the
charge sheet with blue ink, meaning thereby has intended that applicant be not tried for
the alleged offence.
4. That SSP Jacobabad during track of investigation of above case verified the travel
history of present applicant from Deputy Director, FIA Immigration at Jinnah
International Airport Karachi through letter No. L.B 2140-42 dated 16-04-2024 which
found to be true and correct.
5. That it is the matter of record that present applicant was complainant in case Crime No.
217 of 2016 registered with PS A Section Kandhkot u/s 302 PPC against complainant
party of this case therefore in order to settle the account of previous enmity his name
was introduced by highly influential complainant with the help of police just to see
present applicant behind the bars.
6. That it is the well settled principles of law that police can not register a case against a
person who was not present at the scene of offence but available in another country. The
registration of a case against a person who was not available in the country at the time of
the incident is a case of mala fide intention and abuse of the powers so he was rightly let
of by police during the track of investigation.
5. That the impugned order dated 27-06-2024, passed by the learned I/C Consumer
Protection Court/JM Jacobabad is totally against the law and justice.
6. That when final report was submitted by the I.O before the court of learned magistrate
while putting the name of present applicant in coloumn No. 2 of the charge sheet than
the learned magistrate got verified the documents which were produced by the present
applicant before I.O so also before the court of learned magistrate and documents were
verified from concerned authorities and were found to be true and correct.
7. That the learned I/C Consumer Protection Court/JM Jacobabad passed the impugned
order in hasty manner without perusing the documentary material placed on record and
did not considered the police report and passed the order.
8. That the order dated 27-06-2024 passed by the learned I/C Consumer Protection
Court/JM Jacobabad is based on presumption and assumption, therefore, the law, facts,
equity, and justice requires that application may be allowed and impugned order may be
set aside.
9. That the order dated 27-6-2024 passed by the learned I/C Consumer Protection
Court/JM Jacobabad is not proper form and grass and whole sale injustice has been done
to the applicants and order has been passed in violation of guidelines and principles led
down by the Superior courts.
10. That further grounds would be argued at the time of hearing of this application, with
kind permission of this Honourable court.
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that this is the 1st Crl Misc application filed before this Hon’ble court on
behalf of the applicants no any other application of similar nature is pending before this Hon’ble
Court or any other court of law having jurisdiction.
VERSUS
It is prayed on behalf of the above named applicant that this Honourable Court
may graciously be pleased to treat the above matter as urgent and fix it in the Court on:08-
07-.2024 as the matter requires urgency else the filling of instant application would become
infractures.
VERSUS
INDEX
4.
Certified true copy of report u/s 173 CrPC B
6.
CTC of Scrutiny report of I/C DPP Jacobabad C
7.
PS Copy of Opinion of SSP Jacobabad D
17.
Urgent application
01 to 02
18.
Exemption application 03 to 04
19.
Vakalatnama 05 to 06
VERSUS
It is prayed on behalf of the above named applicants that this Honourable may
graciously be pleased to exempt him from filing the certified true copies of Annexures D to E-
1, G to K, as the same are not readily available with the applicants and also exempt him from
filling English true translations of annexure B as the same is not readily available with the
applicant.
Sd/- Complainant, SD
NIC: 43105-2478660-9 I/C ASI PS MUBARAKPUR
Cell Phone: 0323-8073830
CERTIFICATE.