Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dev2002
Dev2002
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Economic and Political Weekly is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Economic and Political Weekly
work status, etc, are thought to be some household level and at the community level.
Introduction of the influential factors driving couple's Our argument comes closer to the ques-
decision on number of children. tion addressed in sociological literature on
ne of the important social changes However, recent evidences suggest that micro-macro linkages between individual
taking place in developing coun-the individual and household level factors and community [Alexander 1988, Coleman
tries recently is the rapid decline are unable to explain the full course of 1990]. This question was also partially
in fertility defying conventional theoriesfertility transition taking place in some ofaddressed in the context of demographic
the states in India and Bangladesh. Studiesliterature [Bongaarts and Watkins 1996,
and beliefs. The fertility decline observed
in Bangladesh and many states in India,observed a geographical regularity in Entwisle et al 1989, Munshi and Myaux
thus, still remains a paradox. The decline,Indian fertility transition [Guilmoto 2000]. 2000]. The concept of diffusion of family
The fertility transition in some regions cutplanning was also based on the fact that
in this region, had taken place in extremely
difficult conditions, like, low standard ofacross socio-economic and cultural bound- there is a peculiar geographical pattern in
living, low literacy level, lack of moderni-aries. For instance, contraceptive use, infertility irrespective of socio-economic
sation, etc. states like Andhra Pradesh and even in background. However, we depart from the
The conventional approach to the stud- Bangladesh, was predominantly by those diffusion argument in the following way.
ies on fertility decline had been based on with low economic and social background.First, diffusion as a theory only speaks
the strong premise that the decision on the Although at a superficial level there may
about the spread of birth control technol-
number of children is taken purely pri- ogy. We argue that it is not the mere
be a tendency to call it as poverty induced
vately within the household decision- one, one need to go a little further information
to on the birth control, (which
making framework. Hence the question understand the real factors behind such
most of the women in India and Bangladesh
has been on how the individual decision important social transformation. possess even earlier) but is the sum total
on number of children is shaped in differ-We, therefore, argue that the failure of
of one's interaction within the community
ent settings? Both economic and social the conventional approach in explaining that makes one to take a progressive
development arguments emphasised their the recent decline in fertility is due to
decisions like the acceptance of contracep-
overemphasis on household level variables.
respective roles in shaping such individual tive use. Secondly, the diffusion does not
Thus, though purely private, decision on
decisions. In other words, the attempt thus speak about the pathways through which
far was to assess the importance of indi-the number of children and contraceptivethe acquired knowledge on birth control
vidual or household level variables in use are mostly shaped at the level of
is put into practice. We argue that the
community in the context of south Asian
influencing fertility decisions. This assess- diffusion takes place through a social
interactive framework (such as associa-
region. Hence, the impelling force behind
ment is partly due to the fact that fertility
theories are drawn mainly from the a progressive decision like contraceptive
expe- tional activities, self-help groups, infor-
rience of western European countries. acceptance
Thus often is the level of one'smal gatherings around, etc) rather than
household economic standard of living,interaction
its within the community. Thus through a purely individualised interac-
social standing, exposure to mass media,
we try to integrate the argument at the
tion. Third, while claims are being made
III States TFR 1996-98 Female Literacy Rate, 2001 Infant Mortality Rate1998-99
Andhra Pradesh
Fertility Pattern Assam 2.3 56.03 69.5
Bihar 3.5 33.57 72.9
Fertility decline, in fact, can be observed
Goa 1.8 75.51 36.7
in many states in India, though the accel- Gujarat 2.7 58.60 62.6
erated pace of transition is restricted to a Haryana 2.9 56.31 56.8
Himachal Pradesh 2.1 68.08 34.4
few states. Thus the country has now
Karnataka 2.1 57.45 51.5
considerable regional heterogeneity in Kerala 2.0 87.86 16.3
demographic characteristics. Table 1 pre- Madhya Pradesh 3.3 50.28 86.1
sents total fertility rate in different states Maharastra 2.5 67.51 43.7
Orissa 2.5 50.97 81.0
in India during 1996-98 period. Two other
Punjab 2.2 63.55 57.1
conventional indicators that are thought to Rajastan 3.9 44.34 80.4
be crucial in fertility transition are also Tamil Nadu 2.2 64.55 48.2
presented in the table. Uttar Pradesh 4.0 42.98 86.7
Over two child differences exist between West Bengal 2.3 60.22 48.7
2.3 51.17 65.8 India
low and high fertility states in India. The 2.9 54.16 67.6
association between conventional factors
Note: IMR is for five year
and fertility is also fairly strong consi-
Source: TFR and IMR data a
dering a state level analysis. The correla- census of India (20001)
tion coefficient of Total Fertility Rate (TFR)
with Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) as well Table 2: TFR, Fema
of Andhra Pradesh
as female literacy is over 0.7 indicating
strong relationship. However, such rela- Region TFR (0-9 Years Percentage of Literate Child (under Age 5)
tionship does not hold good if one look Preceding the Survey, Ever-Married Women Mortality, Approximately
1992-93) (13-49 years) for 1986-88 Period
at regional or sub-regional fertility levels
and socio-economic variables in rapidly North Coast 2.9 23.1 148
fertility declining states. For instance in South Coast 3.0 41.0 117
Rayalaseema 3.7 22.7 132
Andhra Pradesh those districts with poor Telangana 3.4 31.0 96
literacy rate in the coastal area like Godavari depression 3.0 26.5 114
Srikakulam and Vizianagaram also re- Andhra Pradesh 3.2 31.3 117
corded steep decline in fertility. The re- Note: The following are the districts
gional level data for Andhra Pradesh is North coast: Srikakulam, Vizianag
presented in Table 2. South coast: East Godavari, West G
Rayalaseema: Chittoor, Cuddapah,
It is a bit puzzling that even with the
Telangana: Mahabubnagar, Rangare
percentage of literate as low as 23 per cent Godavari Depression: Karimnagar,
and with highest child mortality rate the Source: Bhat and Xavier (1999).
Source: For India column no 2 is from Planning Commission estimates for 1999-2000, 3, 5 and 7 is from Census of India (1991), 4 from Cen
6, 8 and 9 is from National Family Health Survey 1998-99. For Bangladesh these figures are compiled as part of the Bangladesh Hu
Report (2000).