theme: Fighting For the gods

Alexander the invincible god

Uniting a diverse army through deification
Although AlexAnder the greAt wAs not the First humAn to receive divine honors, his selF-deiFicAtion set An exAmple For hellenistic kings, romAn emperors, And other rulers. however, this would not hAve been the cAse iF AlexAnders selF-deiFicAtion hAd not been entirely rAtionAl And iF it hAd not oFFered AdvAntAges thAt no Ancient ruler could AFFord to ignore.

Statuary postdating Alexanders reign showed complete acceptance of Alexanders divine status. This bust, dated to the 2nd century AD, emphasizes his heroic character and even has a hole in the crown of the head for the insertion of a metal star, symbolic of his deification. Now in the Walters Museum of Art, Baltimore, Maryland.
Karwansaray Publishers

By Jona Lendering The Macedonians had wanted to attack Persia since 340, but their king Philip had decided first to teach the Greeks that their defeat in the Third Sacred War (356-346) had been decisive. He acted quickly. In 338, he defeated the Athenians and Thebans at Chaeronea; in 337, he reorganized Greece in the Corinthian League; and in the spring of 336, when the Persian Empire was
38 Ancient Warfare

suffering from a civil war, his advance guard crossed the Hellespont. Several towns in Asia Minor revolted and hailed Philip, who was still in Macedonia, as their liberator. The people of Eresus (a town on the island Lesbos) erected an altar to Zeus Philippios and Ephesians placed his statue in the sanctuary of Artemis. Now that he shared a shrine with a

deity - the Greek word is synnaos Philip had been raised to a rank higher than that of a mere mortal, but even better was to come. In October 336, the Macedonian king wanted to celebrate the wedding of his daughter Cleopatra and his departure to the Persian front. Those who attended the ceremony in the theater of Aegae saw that statues of the twelve

AW nr5 okt2010.indd 38

03-10-2010 08:30:34

theme: Fighting For the gods be A generAl

Olympian deities had been placed on the stage, and that Philip wanted to sit on a throne between them. He wanted to be the equal of the gods, isotheos. It was not to be. Philip was murdered during the celebration (by a bodyguard, for personal reasons), and many Greeks and Macedonians must have believed that this was the fitting punishment of the blasphemer. Yet, he had set an example for Alexander, whose spectacular career was to be matched by an equally spectacular rise in the cosmic hierarchy: crown prince, king of Macedonia, king of Asia, son of Zeus, justice incarnated, avatar of Vishnu, and invincible god.

King of Asia

As is well-known, Alexander invaded Asia in 334 and defeated a force of satraps - Persias royal army force was still suppressing revolts in Babylonia and Egypt - at a small river called Granicus. He proceeded to capture towns that were, after the destruction of the Persian forces, under-garrisoned. After losing the strategic initiative during the time-consuming siege of Halicarnassus, the Macedonian armies united at Gordion, where they were forced to wait for the next move by their enemies: would they continue the naval offensive in the west or would they gather an army in Syria? During this pause, Alexander visited a shrine containing an old chariot. According to an ancient oracle, the man who was able to untie the knot with which a yoke

was tied to the chariot would one day be king of Asia. The way Alexander solved the problem, by cutting the knot, has become proverbial. The original, native myth behind the prediction cannot have been about kingship of Asia. Asia is of course not an Asian concept: the idea that something called Asia existed originated on the shores of the Aegean Sea where Europe and Asia are recognizable entities. And even if Asia would have been a concept known to the people of Gordion, what would that have meant to the Macedonians and Greeks? Was Asia only the name of the eastern shore of Aegean Sea? Was it all the land until the Euphrates? A synonym for the Persian Empire? The entire continent? No one knew, and that made the prediction perfectly suitable as propaganda. At any given time, and no matter where the Persians decided to attack, Alexander could claim victory. As it happened, the new Persian king, Darius III, recalled his troops from the Aegean Sea to Syria, and Alexander marched southeast, where he defeated the Persian main force at Issus (November 333). The road to the Persian ports in Phoenicia lay open, and it was certain that most cities would eventually come to terms with the Macedonians. Alexander could rightfully claim to be king of Asia, and although his biographer Plutarch who is not interested in chronology states that the young Macedonian ruler accepted this title only after his victory at Gaugamela, the

historian Arrian is probably right that it happened immediately after Issus. At that point, Alexander also started to use the expression basileus, king, in inscriptions (e.g. the foundation inscription of the temple of Athena Polias in Priene). Anyhow, it was after a military victory that Alexander started to call himself king of Asia. It was his first step towards divinity.

Son of Zeus

After the conquest of Phoenicia, where Alexander left several garrisons, he proceeded to Egypt. His motives are not entirely clear, but control of one of the main grain suppliers of Greece was useful, because the Greek towns had not been fully pacified. Whatever the reason, the move meant an expansion of the war and required a larger army. We read about reinforcements by contingents from several subject nations, like the Samarians. We also read about non-Macedonian and nonGreek officials, like the Egyptian Petisis, who was left in charge of Lower Egypt. Alexanders army and kingdom were becoming increasingly complex. In Egypt, Alexander tried to present himself as a local ruler, for example by sacrificing to the Apis bull, a ritual that the Greeks believed to be important for The proskynesis ritual on a relief from the northern stairs of the Apadana in Persepolis, now in the National Archaeological Museum of Tehran.

Ancient Warfare

Jona Lendering, Livius.org

39

AW nr5 okt2010.indd 39

03-10-2010 08:30:35

theme: Fighting For the gods

Alexander, with a thunderbolt, crowned by Nike. Reverse of a coin now in the National Bank of Denmark, Copenhagen. the Egyptians. Among the royal titles accepted by Alexander were ancient names like beloved by Amun and chosen by Ra. The really important point, however, was the common pharaonic title son of Ra, which might be translated as both son of Zeus (because Ra was Egypts supreme god) and son of Helios (because Ra was a solar deity). Both must have appealed to Alexander, who belonged to a dynasty that claimed to descend from Zeus son Heracles, and was somehow connected to the sun as well (see box). The title of son of Zeus was immediately accepted in the Greek world. While Alexander was venturing in the western desert, where the priest of the oracle of Ammon in Siwa again saluted him as son of a god, reports about Alexanders new title must have been carried to Greece on the last ships to cross the Mediterranean before the winter set in. When the sea was open again in the spring of 331, the first ships to arrive in Egypt brought the news that the old oracle of Didyma, which had been silent since the age of Xerxes, had spoken again, and had unexpectedly announced that Alexander was the son of Zeus. It is easy to be cynical about this. To Alexander, who seriously believed to be a descendant of Heracles and Achilles, it was a fact of life that mere mortals could have divine fathers. Besides, the Macedonian soldiers were already far from home, the outcome of the war was still uncertain, and the treasuries of Susa an Persepolis still had to be captured. Accepting glorious titles
40 Ancient Warfare

was a way to inspire the men. There was more to come, because Alexanders army became increasingly complex the ruler cult was to be an important way to keep it united.

Sogdia

At the Euphrates, the Persian army managed to block Alexanders march to Babylon, forcing him to make a detour along the Tigris. It was the last Persian success. At Gaugamela, the Macedonians and their allies defeated their opponents, who were demoralized by a celestial omen. Alexander captured and garrisoned Babylon and Susa, fought himself a way through the Zagros mountains, reached the Persian capital Persepolis, and sacked it. In July 330, Darius III was killed by his own satraps, and while the murderers fled to Sogdia (modern Uzbekistan), the son of Zeus faced the strategic dilemma that had been in the making for some time: if he returned home, an Iranian leader might reunite the Empire and become dangerous again (as Mithradates I the Great was to do in the 140s), if Alexander stayed, he needed more garrisons than Macedonia and Greece could send. He chose the second course, which inevitably meant that he would have to strike a compromise with the defeated Persians: they would have to be the Macedonians partners. This created tensions with more conservative people in Alexanders army. Many soldiers wanted to go back, but instead, they had to invade Sogdia an operation that was only necessary to appease

the Persians, who wanted to see the murderers of their king punished. The frustrated soldiers must have felt even worse when they learned that their commander had started to dress like a Persian king. The problems were exacerbated when the Macedonian infantry forces suffered defeats and the Iranian cavalry achieved successes. Tensions between the European and the Asian units, tensions between the Macedonian veterans and newly arrived Greek mercenaries, tensions between cavalry and infantry: more than ever, Alexander needed a unifying principle. The perfect solution was to introduce the Persian court ritual, in which every nation and rank had a way of its own to approach the ruler. We cannot reconstruct the details, but perhaps non-soldiers were to prostrate themselves, soldiers were to bow, and the highest (Macedonian) officers were to blow a kiss. The introduction was carefully staged and the Iranian officers saluted the new great king as they were used to, but when a courtier made a joke about what was going on, this attempt to unite court and army in one ritual came to naught. Alexanders anger is best proven by the fact that no one in the camp ever discovered what became of the jokester. The Iranian court ritual was so offensive because the Greeks were not used to bow they only bowed for their gods. So, if Alexander wanted to give a sense of shared values to his army, he had to become a god. As it happened, there was a second incident that brought Alexander to the same conclusion. During a banquet, when Alexander was drunk, he killed one of his friends. Immediately, he announced he would commit suicide, which would no doubt result in the violent disintegration of the army. Everyone agreed that this had to be avoided at all costs, and a philosopher convinced the son of Zeus that he had done nothing wrong. After all, he was a king and kings made laws, hence kings were above the law, and anything was allowed if it was done by a king, as if he were justice incarnated.

Public domain

Rainmaker

After the genocidal campaign in Sogdia had ended, the Macedonians invaded

AW nr5 okt2010.indd 40

03-10-2010 08:30:37

theme: Fighting For the gods

The Sun King

Herodotus relates an old, rationalized legend about Macedonias first king and his connection to the sun (Histories 8.137). We would like to know more about it, because on many occasions Alexander is connected to the sun as well: he compares himself to a sun (Diodorus, World History 17.54.5) and is upset when he faces the setting sun (Appian, Civil Wars 2.153). Later artists had no problems in equaling the Macedonian conqueror to Helios, and although this may be a reconsideration of the fact that Alexander, like the sun, had seen the entire world, it is equally likely that the association was already in existence during Alexanders life. It may be noted that the closest iconographic parallel to the sixteen-pointed symbol that is now known as the star of Vergina, is the sun as shown on the coins of Ouranopolis, a new city, founded by Cassanders brother Alexarchus, surnamed the sun.

phants slipped away in the mud, the archers could not fix their three-meter tall bows on solid ground. Immediately after the fight, Alexander issued a new set of coins, showing himself with a lightning bolt in his hand. In other words, the official battle theology was that Alexander had caused the rain to fall, an idea that fitted perfectly in both Iranian ideas about kingship and Macedonian ideas that Alexander was the son of the cloud-gathering Zeus. Did the soldiers believe it? Perhaps not: they refused to invade the kingdom of Magadha along the Ganges, forcing Alexander to return. An incident during the return campaign shows how Alexander tried to deify himself: when he was in fact wounded in his sternum (as Nearchus tells us), he pretended to have a pneumothorax (as Ptolemy has recorded). His soldiers, who knew that such an injury was incurable, must have been impressed when Alexander managed to ride a horse after a surprisingly brief time. This incident also suggests that the Macedonian king himself did not believe that he was a god. It was only necessary to unify his army.

The invincible god

the Punjab. Somewhere near modern Kabul, a group of frightened rajas came to Alexander, saying that they had heard stories about visiting gods, but had never seen a deity themselves, which was why they had come to submit themselves to Alexander. It is hard to reconstruct what lies behind this incident, but it is likely that the Indian leaders recognized the conqueror as avatar of Vishnu. However that may be, they were the first to recognize Alexander as the god he believed he needed to be. Assuming that all of India had now surrendered, Alexander invaded the Punjab, mercilessly killing anyone who resisted. The main battle was fought in the spring of 326 against the leader of the kingdom of the Paurava, who is usually called Porus in the Greek sources. The battle was won because during a devastating rain shower, the Indian leader could not employ his main weapons: his chariots and ele-

A request to sacrifice to Alexander is not attested, but there are strong indications that by the end of 324, the king received divine honors. He had already presented himself as Dionysus, and if we are to believe Ephippus, one of his courtiers, Alexander also wore the attributes of Heracles occasionally. It was an act, and he still hoped to persuade the Macedonian part of his army to join: if he pretended to be their god, they could pretend that they worshiped him, and they would have a unified army, court, and state. The Greek towns were certainly willing to join. The Ephesians invented a nice story about Alexanders miraculous birth and hired a famous artist to make a painting of Alexander with his lightning bolt; in Priene, the house where Alexander had once spent a couple of nights, became a temple; and in Athens, an altar was dedicated to the invincible god. By 323, Alexander seemed to have achieved his aim, and it is possible to read the story about the Opis Mutiny not as a mutiny,

but as an account of Alexanders last victory: his own men looking for a way to accept the Iranian court ritual. We dont know, but it is certain that kneeling and kissing were common at the court of Alexanders successors. Alexander died, on June 11, 323 in Babylon while preparing for a campaign to Arabia. One anecdote, recorded by Arrian, tells that the king at some stage wanted to drown himself in the Euphrates, so that his body would be lost and people would believe that he ascended to heaven. The story is of course untrue, but fits his general aims. The self-deification had been a rational policy, and was repeated by his successors: the ruler cult of the Hellenistic kings and Roman emperors is wellattested. It was a strategy for anyone who had to create unity in the armies, courts, and kingdoms. But it came at a price: during the Roman Empire, it was generally recognized that Alexanders idea that the god-king was not subject to the law, was the equivalent of moral corruption. The man who had conquered the world, had lost his soul. It is possible that the famous remark, made by Vespasian on his death bed, that he feared becoming a god, was not a joke at all, but a serious observation about the corruptive nature of power. n Jona Lendering wrote several books about ancient history in Dutch, among them a well-received biography of Alexander the Great. His website Livius. org gave its name to the school for history he now leads.

Further reading

The importance of the events in Sogdia and India is dealt with by A.B. Bosworth in his Alexander and the East. The Tragedy of Triumph (Oxford 1998). The interpretation of the coins discussed above is based on Frank Holt, Alexander the Great and the Mystery of the Elephant Medallions (Berkeley 2003).

Ancient Warfare

41

AW nr5 okt2010.indd 41

03-10-2010 08:30:37