Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 9

21, rue d’Artois, F-75008 PARIS B3-112 CIGRE 2014

http : //www.cigre.org

Limitations, trends and potentials in the design of modern gas-insulated high


voltage switchgear

D. GAUTSCHI1), K. POHLINK1), R. LUESCHER1), Y. KIEFFEL2)


1)
ALSTOM Grid AG, Switzerland
2)
ALSTOM Grid, France

SUMMARY

The gas-insulated switchgear (GIS) technology has constantly been improved in the past years
regarding compactness, SF6 volume, cost and accessibility. Between the first introduction in
the late 1960s and today for example the SF6 mass of a 145 kV standard double busbar GIS
bay was reduced by 85%, the bay volume by almost 90% and the drive energy by more than
50%.
Besides these achievements described above, improvements in terms of accessibility,
monitoring, flexibility and gas tightness have been made.
Further improvements can be achieved but come along with restrictions given by physical
limitations or causing higher manufacturing cost. An example is the use of alternative gases
like dry air or CO2 to replace SF6 within the GIS which is possible already today. Also the use
of vacuum interrupters limits todays current interrupting and carrying capabilities.
A complete substitution of SF6 will most probably not be in form of a single gas but rather a
mixture of different gases. The paper shows results of laboratory tests from the dielectric and
temperature rise point of view. The results of the investigations of alternative gases look
promising and there is a chance that further investigations lead to a possible substitution of
SF6 as insulating gas within high voltage switchgear.

KEYWORDS

Gas Insulated Switchgear, GIS, Alternative Gases, CO2, SF6, Dielectric Withstand, Temperature Rise,
Latest Technology, GIS Evolution.

david.gautschi@alstom.com
1. INTRODUCTION

Since the introduction of gas-insulated high voltage switchgear (GIS) on the market in the late 1960s
the development of this technology has shown a constant evolution. Not only the size of the
switchgear and the drive energy of circuit-breakers have constantly decreased due to the introduction
of new technologies [1, 2], but also the current carrying capability of the circuit-breakers,
disconnectors and make-proof earthing switches has dramatically increased. In the last years a trend in
the direction towards eco-design is visible [3]. The volume and the leakage rate of SF6 have been
consequently reduced and the focus was set to use a high proportion of recyclable material and to
reduce the joule losses of the components. This paper presents the evolution of GIS in the past, the
actual stage and possible future evolutions especially the use of alternative gases.

2. GIS SWITCHGEAR EVOLUTION

The Figure 1 show the evolution of key parameters of 145 kV GIS of different generations from the
same manufacturer. The dotted blue line shows an exponential trend line for three-phase encapsulated
GIS, the dashed red line the exponential trend line for single-phase encapsulated GIS. The compared
bay layout contains two busbar disconnectors/earthing switches, a circuit breaker, a current and
voltage transformer, a line disconnector/earthing switch, a make-proof earthing switch and cable
sealing ends.

a) Evolution of the bay volume b) Evolution of the bay weight


3

Bay weight in t
Bay volume in m

Year of design Year of design

c) Evolution of the SF6 mass d) Evolution of the drive energy


SF6 mass of CB & CP in kg

(CB and CP) (CB opening operation)


Drive energy in kJ

Year of design Year of design

Figure 1: Evolution of key parameters of 145 kV GIS

2.1 REDUCTION OF THE BAY VOLUME


In the voltage range up to 170 kV more than 80% of the GIS are installed inside a building. The cost
of the building is almost proportional to its size. Therefore for the customers one of the important
parameter of a GIS is its compactness. Even if GIS is already by the technology itself very compact,

2
the bay volume has decreased dramatically since the introduction of GIS technology in the 1960s. In
Figure 1a) this evolution is illustrated for three-phase and single-phase 145 kV GIS with the same
ratings. It is visible that the introduction of three-phase arrangements made it possible to further
reduce the volume of the bays. Even if the physics behind the switchgear remains the same, the
introduction of new simulation tools, improvements in manufacturing processes and the design closer
to the physical limits has made this evolution possible and will probably lead to further improvements
in the future.

2.2 REDUCTION OF THE BAY WEIGHT


The weight of the equipment is another parameter related to the cost of the product. A weight
reduction might lead to lower product cost. In addition a reduction of the weight leads to a reduction
of the static load to the building which is related to the cost of the building.
In Figure 1b) the evolution of the weight of a double busbar bay with nominal voltage of 145 kV is
presented. The weight was reduced over the time but it is visible that the introduction of three-phase
encapsulated switchgear had in the first years after their introduction a negative effect on the weight.

2.3 REDUCTION OF THE SF6 MASS


Due to the fact that SF6 has a 22'800 times higher global warming potential than CO2, manufacturers
are searching for a replacement of SF6 since decades. But besides the good dielectric properties, SF6
has excellent characteristics in terms of current interrupting capabilities and heat transportation. Until
today no alternative gas with the same performance like SF6 has been found. Therefore it was the
intention to reduce at least the mass of SF6 needed for the switchgear in order to design environmental
friendly products. In Figure 1c) this effort is shown for the circuit breaker (CB) chamber together with
the common point (CP) for different 145 kV GIS with the same ratings.

2.4 REDUCTION OF THE CIRCUIT BREAKER DRIVE ENERGY


Besides the above mentioned optimisations, the introduction of new circuit breaker technologies
contributed as well to the reduction of cost and size of the switchgear mainly by the reduction of the
operating energy. The type of encapsulation (three-phase or single-phase) did not have an influence. In
Figure 1d) the drive energy for an opening operation for the different 145kV circuit breakers are
shown.

3. LATEST 145 kV GIS DEVELOPMENTS

3.1 STATE OF THE ART DESIGN


The latest developments regarding the compactness of switchgear lead to the layout presented in
Figure 2. The bay dimensions are 3.75 m in length, 2.5 m in height and a bay width of 0.8 m. Due to
the small dimensions, up to six standard bays can be transported in one 40’ high cube general purpose
container.
Although the footprint and bay volume were further reduced, the accessibility to filling valves,
densimeters, sensors, inspection windows and terminals was optimized and the accessibly from the
front of the switchgear (busbar) or from its back was improved. For each compartment two inspection
windows are installed in order to have the possibility to illuminate the contacts through one window
and observe them through the other. The gas filling valves and densimeter are connected to the gas
compartment through a valve which allows the user to test and change the densimeters and filling
valves in service.
In addition the installation and commissioning time on site is reduced due to the fact that coupling
elements and the local control cubicles are mounted and tested in the factory. In addition separate
connection housings and GIL elements can be delivered fully tested on site.

3
Circuit breaker with spring drive
Voltage
Local control transformer
cubicle

Make-proof
2.5 m earthing switch

Combined
busbar
Integrated cable
disconnector
& earthing interface
switch
Current transformer

3.75 m
Figure 2: State of the art ultra-compact three-phase encapsulated double busbar 145 kV GIS bay

3.2 KEY ACHIEVEMENTS


3.2.1 SF6 Mass Reduction
In comparison with the previous generation of 145 kV GIS the gas volume was reduced by 35%. This
was possible due to the higher compactness of the components and by changing the pressure concept.
The nominal SF6 pressure was reduced by 0.12 MPa compared to the previous product. As in previous
GIS designs the pressure for all components remains the same in order not maintain different pressure
systems within a substation.
3.2.2 Reduction of the Leakage Rate
A reduction of the leakage rate below 0.1% per year and per substation has been reached by the
reduction of the overall sealing length. The main contribution came from the introduction of a novel
fixation of the insulator between two flanges (see Figure 3). The insulator is fixed between two flanges
without the need of a separate fixation ring. With this solution only one single sealing per flange is
needed. Together with the combination of different housings into a single casting this leads to a
reduction of the sealing length of around 50%. The use of high quality gaskets with an excellent return
of experience contribute as well to the performance.

Enclosure flanges

High quality gasket

Barrier insulator

Figure 3: Barrier insulator fixed between two flanges without the need of additional fixation rings

3.2.3 Ultra Compact Multi-Function Housing


The introduction of a multi-purpose housing called “Integrated Cable Interface” leads to
simplification, reduction of parts and to reduction of the SF6 mass (see Figure 2). It allows integrating
a variety of different functions into the same enclosure. The following components can be installed
within this housing: Line disconnector and earthing switch, make-proof earthing switch, cable sealing
ends, voltage detectors, disconnecting links to voltage transformers and surge arresters, UHF sensors,
inspection windows and standard conductors.

4
3.3 MEASURES TO OVERCOME TEMPERATURE RISE LIMITATIONS
The reduction of the size leads to a reduction of the surface of the switchgear. The surface is a key
factor of the behavior of the temperature rise at nominal current. In addition the lower SF6 pressure
compared to the previous generation leads to an inferior temperature rise between the high voltage
conductors and the enclosure. The heat dissipation ability was therefore one of the critical subjects.
The behavior was simulated with sophisticated tools already from the beginning of the design of the
components. To improve the thermal performance and to pass the test within the IEC limits different
measures were taken:
• On critical components the enclosure surface was enlarged by cooling fins in order to increase
the convection on the enclosure.
• The high voltage conductors were designed with an enlarged surface and a high emission
coefficient in order to increase the radiation of heat towards the enclosure
• On critical parts the high voltage conductors were made with slots and holes in order to
increase the convection around the live parts of the switchgear.

4. POSSIBLE FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS

4.1 FURTHER REDUCTION IN SIZE AND SF6 VOLUME


A further reduction of the switchgear size is still possible due to the fact that the physical limits, for
example the allowed dielectric field strength, is not yet reached everywhere in the switchgear. But a
further reduction in space leads to other consequences impacting higher cost. As shown in Figure 2 the
three high voltage conductors of the described GIS are arranged in a line. A further reduction of the
size of the switchgear could be achieved by changing the conductor arrangement into a triangle.
However such a triangle arrangement of the conductors leads to less flexibility on elbow housings and
direction changes.
Other arrangements like single-phase enclosure designs lead to less volume of SF6 but come along
with other restrictions or disadvantages. The Table I gives an overview over advantages and
shortcomings, especially regarding SF6 volume and cost for different enclosure designs and conductor
arrangements.

Table I: Comparison of advantages and drawbacks of different enclosure and conductor arrangements

Effect on Effect
Arrangement Advantages Disadvantages
SF6 volume on cost
small bay width, simple
bigger diameter of the
enclosures, simple
+ +++ enclosure than for
conductors, easy
triangle arrangements
direction changes

small bay width, complex conductors and


++ ++
simple enclosures direction changes

accessibility, 2 phase
+++ + arrangements possible, bay width, use of material
complex layouts possible
reduction of the bay complex housings,
+++ + width regarding to single accessibility to
phase enclosure design components

5
4.2 LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS OF ALTERNATIVE GASES FOR GIS-APPLICATION
Due to the high global warming potential of SF6, manufacturers and universities are searching for a
replacement since decades. Possible alternative gases have already been found but they come along
with other restrictions like highly toxic decomposition products (ex. CF3I), still too high global
warming potential (ex. PFC) or limitations in the operating temperature of the switchgear to a non-
convenient point [4, 5, 6]. For GIL and low temperature applications below -25°C mixtures of SF6 and
N2with the ratio of 20%/80% have been successfully installed and operate since decades [7].
A number of investigations were made with dry air or components which are part of air (N2, O2, CO2,
Ar etc) or mixtures between SF6 and these components [8, 9, 10]. Different manufacturers have
already launched products based on dry air and CO2 for the lower high voltage range up to 145 kV.
Most of these products are based on vacuum interrupting chambers with limited rated current
compared with SF6 equivalents. In the past years new investigations have been made by the use of
modern approaches like chemical molecule analysis or the pulsed townsend method [10].
In the following sections the performance of dry air and artificial mixtures of different gases in
comparison to SF6 are presented. The investigations were made in the manufacturer’s laboratory.

4.2.1 Dielectric Performance


Laboratory investigations have been made by the use of dry air as insulation medium in GIS instead of
SF6 on a GIS disconnector with 145 kV rating. The disconnector was tested in closed position and the
pressure of the dry air was increased until the dielectric performance according to IEC for 72.5 kV-
equipment was reached (1 minute for AC stress, no flashover for 15 progressive lightning impulses).
In Figure 4 the curves for AC and lightning impulse stress are shown. The AC limit of 140 kV can be
reached already at a minimum pressure of 0.25 MPa overpressure. To reach the dielectric performance
for lightning impulse withstand of 325 kV (positive and negative) 0.46 MPa overpressure are needed.

a) b)
AC breakdown voltage in kV

LI breakdown voltage in kV

IEC test voltage

IEC test voltage

Pressure [hPag] Pressure [hPag]

Figure 4: Breakdown voltage versus pressure for dry air within a 145 kV GIS disconnector (blue
dotted curve) a) AC and b) negative lightning impulse withstand voltage. In red the IEC
test voltages for 72.5 kV equipment.

As shown in Figure 4 the use of dry air instead of SF6 in the same pressure vessel leads to much lower
dielectric performance. More or less the same results can be assumed if CO2 is used and a slightly
lower performance is anticipated for pure N2 [8, 9, 11].
Even if the dielectric performance of the above mentioned gases is divided by more than two
compared with SF6, multiple manufacturers have already introduced SF6-free systems based on these
gases, leading to systems which are more expensive and/or use more space than the SF6 equivalents.
In order to reach the compactness SF6 GIS have today, the manufacturers therefore search for other
gases. The latest research in terms of alternative gases leads to a mix of different gases. The mixing
ratio of the gases can be changed and the pressure concept adapted in order to reach the dielectric
performance as the SF6 counterpart. Examples are the mixtures of N2/CF3I or C6K/air. Unfortunately
the results were not satisfying as shown in the Table II.
6
Table II: Comparison of the dielectric performance for mixtures CF3I/N2 (data from [6])

Case 1 Case 2
Total pressure [MPa] 0.5 0.5
Ratio CF3I/N2 [%/%] 20/80 60/40
CF3I pressure [MPa] 0.1 0.3
Equivalent SF6 dielectric
64 100
withstand (%)
Minimum operating
-22 +7
temperature [°C]
Minimum
Oversizing of
operating
Consequence the GIS / cost
temperature not
increase
acceptable

Other gas mixtures than those mentioned above show better dielectric performances. Tests with such
gas mixtures have been performed on a disconnector/earthing switch combined with a cable end box
of an existing GIS design. Results of such investigations are shown in Figure 5 where the mixtures 4
and 5 show a lower performance than SF6. The mixtures 1 to 3 show the same or even better dielectric
performance compared with SF6.
LI breakdown voltage in kV

IEC test voltage

mixtures

Figure 5: Breakdown voltage U*50 and standard deviation for negative lightning impulse for
different gas mixtures within a 145 kV line disconnector/earthing switch housing with
cable end box. In red the corresponding IEC limits for 145 kV ratings.

4.2.2 Temperature Rise Performance


Dry air tests on a fully equipped three-phase encapsulated 145 kV GIS bay containing a circuit
breaker, a current transformer, two busbar disconnectors/earthing switches, a line
disconnector/earthing switch and a cable end box were performed. The inner conductors were
equipped with almost 200 thermocouples in order to measure the temperature rise of the components.
In Figure 6 the difference of the readouts of the sensors between SF6 with 0.55 MPa overpressure
versus dry air with 0.4 MPa overpressure is shown. The difference between the curves of the same
phases is in the range between 10 and 20 K for the pressure difference of 0.15 MPa.

An increase of the pressure is resulting in a decrease in temperature rise. This is shown in Figure 7
where the results of the same equipment filled with dry air but for two different pressures 0.2 MPag
and 0.4 MPag are presented. The difference between the curves of the same phases is in the range
between 5 and 10 K for the pressure difference of 0.2 MPa.

7
Temperature rise in K

Thermocouple location

Figure 6: Temperature rise results of a fully equipped 145 kV GIS bay at 2500 A filled with
0.4 MPag dry air (dashed lines) versus 0.55 MPag SF6.
Temperature rise in K

Thermocouple location

Figure 7: Temperature rise results of a fully equipped 145 kV GIS bay at 2000 A filled with
0.2 MPag (dashed lines) versus 0.4 MPag dry air.

Due to the dielectric restrictions described in chapter 4.2.1 other gases than dry air are under
investigation. Figure 8 shows results of the temperature rise tests of different gas mixtures on a 145 kV
GIS busbar disconnector of the latest generation. The difference in temperature rise of the hottest
phase compared to SF6 is plotted. The temperature difference of around 6 K can be compensated by
measures described in chapter 3.3. From the temperature rise performance an application of all of the
three gases shown in Figure 8 is therefore possible.

8
Temperature difference in K

Thermocouple location

Figure 8: Temperature difference with respect to SF6 of a busbar disconnector/earthing switch at


3150A. The difference of SF6 to three gas mixtures according to Figure 5 is shown.

5. CONCLUSIONS

The GIS technology has been improved in the past years regarding compactness, SF6 mass and cost.
Further improvements can be achieved in one or the other direction but come along with other
restrictions given by physical limitations or manufacturing cost.
The use of alternative gases to replace SF6 within the GIS is technically possible already today.
In this paper the focus of alternative gases was set to dielectric properties and temperature rise
behaviour. The latest research on gas mixtures show that SF6 replacing candidates can be evaluated.
To launch a SF6-free product a number of further parameters have to be taken into account. Further
investigations are required in the field of switching and interrupting performance and the evaluation of
decomposition products.
Therefore the application of alternative gases looks promising and there is a chance that further
investigations lead to a possible substitution of SF6 as insulating gas within high voltage switchgear.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

[1] E. Mikes, K. Pohlink, R. Lüscher, Ph. Ponchon, A. Ficheux, “Sustainable development of HV


gas insulated substations with spring operating mechanisms in the light of technical and
environmental questions”, 16th Conference of the Electric Power Supply Industry, Mumbai,
CEPSI, 2006
[2] M. Bues, E. Mikes, “Compact optimized GIS, modular hybrid substation bays, mobile GIS
substations”, Paper 120, Cigré SC A3 & B3 Joint Colloquium, Tokyo, 2005
[3] I. Huet, H. Aeschbach, C. Tschannen, K. Pohlink, J.L. Bessede, G.F. Montillet, „Full ecodesign
of a 72.5kV GIS substation“, paper 304, Cigré SC A3 & B3 Joint Colloquium, Tokyo, 2005
[4] M. Hikita et al., “Insulation Characteristics of Gas Mixtures including Perfluorocarbon Gas”,
IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, Vol 15, No.°4, August 2008
[5] Ngoc, M.N. et al, “Electrical breakdown of CF3I and CF3I-N2 gas mixtures”, CEIDP, 2009
[6] M. Taki et al., “Interruption Capability of CF3I Gas as a Substitution Candidate for SF6 Gas”,
IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, Vol. 14, No. 2, April 2007
[7] CIGRE brochure 260, “N2/SF6 mistures for gas insulated systems”, Cigré, Paris, 2004
[8] D. Denissov, H. Rebholz, W. Köhler, S. Tenbohlen, “Dielectric Strength of Different Gases in
GIS”, University of Stuttgart, 2005
[9] M. Hairbour et al., “Dielectric withstand of N2, CO2 and SF6 in GIS”, Cigré SC B3 Berlin, 2007
[10] D. Dahl, “Measurements and evaluation of electron transport in electronegative gas mixtures”,
DISS ETH No 21285, ETH Zürich, 2013
[11] K. Juhre et al., “High pressure N2, N2/CO2 and CO2 gas insulation in comparison to SF6 in GIS
application”, ISH Beijing, 2005

You might also like