Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Plato_1678706505
Plato_1678706505
PLATO
Introduction: One of the most creative influential thinkers of Political philosophy who belonged to the
idealist school of thought.
Brief background: As a young man, Plato had political ambitions, but he became a disciple of Socrates,
accepting his basic philosophy and dialectical style of debate: the pursuit of truth through discussions and
dialogues. After Socrates' execution in 399 BC, Plato, fearing for his own safety, travelled to Italy, Sicily
and Egypt. In 388 BC, Plato, after his return to Athens, founded the Academy, the institution often
described as the first European University. It provided a comprehensive curriculum, including such
subjects as astronomy, biology, political theory, philosophy and mathematics.
Works of plato
Plato's writings were in dialogue form, and the hero in all writings except in the Laws was none but his
teacher, Socrates. Plato's works includes 35 dialogues and 13 letters
The Republic: Greatest of all the books as it is a treatise that engulfs every aspect of
Concerning Justice human life.
It, in fact, deals with metaphysics. (the idea of the Good), moral
philosophy (virtue of human soul), education (the scientific training the
rulers ought to have), politics (the Ideal State),the philosophy of history,
economy (communism of property and families) - all combined in one.
The Republic has in total ten books that deal with varied subjects.
It was compiled by young Plato and hence this book mainly deals with
utopian ideas. Plato of Republic is what is known to the world, the
idealist, the philosopher, the radical”
The Laws
The Statesman
Deductive method (general principles are determined first and thereafter, are related to
particular situation.)
Dialectic method (use of dialogue)
Teleological method In Theory of forms (what appears is the shadow of what it can be)
Analogy method (use of examples)
Historical method (traced the evaluation and growth of numerous types of state historically).
Influence of Socrates:
Plato had been influenced by the following scholars and their ideas
Socrates: Theory of knowledge and dialectics, Plato’s
statement - "I thank God that I was born a Greek, and not
Barbarian; a freeman and not a slave, a man and not a
woman; but above all, that I was born in the age of
Socrates." Fundamental idea of “The Republic”came to Plato
based on principle that “virtue is knowledge” given by
Socrates.
o Sabine writes for Plato, "that virtue is knowledge implies that there is an objective good
to be known and that it can in fact be known by rational or logical investigation.”
o Plato urged that the ruler should be one who knows the art, science and knowledge of
administration. Socrates used to say: "The public is ill, we must cure our masters."
THEORY OF IDEAS:
Prominent statements
Reality is the shadow of ideas.
Idea belongs to the world of permanence that is beyond time and space.
Ignorance is the root cause of corruption.
State is individual writ large
Real happiness lies in satisfaction of one’s soul.
Transformation of any process is painful but it is worth doing.
Allegory of caves
Theory of ideas forms the basis of Plato’s political philosophy. All other theories traces its origin
to the theory of ideas. This idea is also based on the Socratic premise of “knowledge is virtue”.
Plato considers two worlds in his theory,
o world of ideas (real)
o physical world(imaginary)
Plato made a distinction between two layers of awareness: Opinion & Knowledge.According to
Plato, the idea of virtue is the idea of action; the ultimate object of virtue is to attain knowledge;
the knowledge of virtue is the highest level of knowledge; knowledge is attainable; and so is virtue
attainable.
The objective of this idea was to create an idea of ‘ideal state’. Being an Athenian Plato was
deeply concerned with the prevailing dismal state of affairs in Athens. Ignorance engraved
corruption in men, as they were searching the meaning of life in materialism. Hence Plato wanted
to show the reality of the Idea and that it can be understood through the use of reason. Matter
belongs to the world of change and hence one should strive for the pursuit of true knowledge.
Plato has devised the method of dialectics to comprehend this idea. The knowledge of virtue is
the highest form of knowledge.
Theabove explained allegory of caves helps to understand the strive towards real knowledge
rather than illusion of knowledge.
Later theory of ideas was criticized by the Marxist school of thought which considered matter as
reality, rather than ideas.
Theory of ideas/ forms also gives rise to another debate which is known as Sophist vs. Socratic debate.
Sophists are materialists. (Money Socratic are Idealist. (Honesty is preferable to money
andpower is a source of good life.) earnedby unfair means.
Sophists are Realists: They believethat Socratic are Idealist: They believe that “Ought” should not
‘What is’ should determine‘What bederived from “What is”, rather we should try to shape
ought to be.’ “Whatis” on the basis of “What ought to be”.
For them Individual is an end. (Part Society is an end. (Whole is prior to part.)
ispriority over whole.)
Society is conventional or creation Man is by nature a social animal. And Hence society is
ofhumans. natural.(organic)
THEORY OF JUSTICE:
Prominent statements:
“ Our aim in founding the state was the greatest happiness of the whole, we thought that in a
state that is ordered with a view to the good of whole we should be most likely to find justice”
State is individual writ large.
Justice is architectonic principle.
Justice is the interest of the strong. World understands the argument of power rather than the
power of argument.
Justice is the interest of the weak.
A just soul is one in which all the elements are specifically positioned.
Justice demands functionalisation and non-interference in each other’s task.
State is interdependence. It doesn’t emerge out of oak or rock.
Commentaries
Sabine: Justice for Plato is a bond threat binds society together.
Barker: Justice for Plato is a human virtue which makes man good and social.
The soul is a permanent feature of our personality. Every soul has three elements:
1.Reason
2.Courage
3.Appetite
However, all souls are not similar. Some are inferior and some are superior souls. There are three
categories of persons, based on the dominant characteristic of the soul.
Justice gives the resemblance of what is used in the Greek language 'Dikaiosyne', a word which
has a more comprehensive meaning than the word 'justice'. 'Dikaiosyne' means ‘just’,
‘righteousness’. That is why Plato’s notion of justice is not regarded legal or judicial, nor it is
related to the realms of 'rights' and 'duties', it does not come within the limits of law; it is,
related to 'social ethics'.
For Plato, justice does not consist in mere adherence to the laws, for it is based on the inner
nature of the human spirit.A just state, Plato argues, is achieved with an eye to the good of the
whole.
In a just society, the rulers, the military, the artisans all do what they ought to do. In such a society,
the rulers are wise, the soldiers are brave and the producers exercise self-control or temperance.
Plato has established justice through the method of dialectics. In the book “Republic” he has decribed
Justice through the characters of Socrates, Cephalus, Polymarchus, Thracymachus and Gluacon.
Polymarchus and Cephalus discuss the traditional view of justice whereas Thracymachus gives the radical
view of Justice. Finally Gluacon ends up with the pragmatic view.
After the following the above dialectics Plato devises his own theory of justice. The characteristics of
Platonicjustice is as follows:
Principle of functional specialization and non-interference
Principle of peace and harmony.
Justice is the quality of human soul and is important.
Justice for state implies due performance of each class for individual which further implies
performance of each element ( appetite, reason and courage) with their proper limit.
Plato has justified the virtues befitting each social class. He defines justice as the virtue befitting the state.
He enumerates four cardinal virtues which must be attained in a perfect state. In this respect he has come
up with the dilemma of dominance (different people are characterized by the predominance of anyone
of the components of human nature like desire emotion and knowledge).Rule of philosopher king is the
logical conclusion of Plato’s theory of Justice.
CRITICISM:
Several criticisms have been leveled against Platonic theory of justice. Platonic doctrine of justice
is based on self - control and self abnegation of the individual in the interest of society. It leads to
functional specialization.
It ignores the evil of functional specialization which does not sufficiently realize and properly
provide for the whole of human personality. It stunts the growth of the individual and there - by
impoverished the society.
Platonic theory of justice divides the state into three separate classes and is not applicable to
modern states with large population and numerous interests and sections of society. His division
of society into separate classes would lead to a class state with class consciousness and privileges.
Further, concentration of political power in the hands of philosophers is likely to lead to
totalitarianism.
As a result Bertrand Russell has dubbed Plato as a totalitarian.
CRITICISM BY ARISTOTLE:
Plato’s justice is based on one man one job which makes life monotonous a d deprives individual
from all round development.
Plato’s conception of justice is moral and not legal and is too subjective.
Plato’s emphasis is mainly on duties and not on rights of the individual.
Economic power is confined into the hands of the producing class which creates a system of
privilege in the society.
THEORY OF EDUCATION
Plato also believed that education builds man's character and it is, therefore, a necessary
condition for extracting man's natural faculties in order to develop his personalities.
Barker, speaking for Plato, says that education is a path of social righteousness, and not of social
success; it is a way to reach the truth.
Each level of education has a pre-assigned function:
Elementary education helps individual give direction to their powers.
Middle level education helps individuals understand their surroundings.
Higher education helps individuals prepare, determine and decide their course of education;
Education helps people earn a living and also helps them to become better human beings.
Stages:
Primary education / Elementary - From 0-6 years Children will be taught Gymnastics (exercise
of body), Music (exercise of mind) & moral stories for character building.
Secondary education / Middle level - From 6-18 years. Basic knowledge of all subjects
1st test at the age of 18 years. Those who fail will join producer class.
Military education - From 18-20 years 2nd test - Those who fail, again join the Producer class
& rest will move forward.
CRITICISM:
Plato’s diagnosis is correct but prescription is not right.
One of the major flaw of Plato is he ignores human
psychology. It is true that those who are eager to come to
power may have lust for power and money, but the
solution cannot be worse than the disease.
It is proven fact that person cannot perform any task well
for longer duration if he or she does not have interest in
his work. We can think of some other legal, institutional
measures to deal with the corruption of the ruling class.
Prominent statements
Barker: abolition of family life among guardian class is inevitably a corollary of their
renunciation of private property.
Plato’s communism is a supplementary mechanism which education system was supposed to
create.
Marxian theory of communism that seeks to eventually establish a classless and hence stateless
society, as according to it the state is instrument of the domination in the hands of ruling classes.
Plato’s theory of communism that is used as one of instruments of consolidation of the
hierarchically ‘well ordered’ state.
COMMUNISM OF PROPERTY:
Deprivation of all the members of the ruling classes, the guardians and soldiers from having any
private property including private house, land or gold and silver (wealth). They shall live in the
state managed barracks and eat in the common mess. According to him those classes which have
the qualities of gold and silver within, need not external silver or gold.
Plato hints at, one female would be wife of all the guardians and one male, the husband of all the
females. A father would have thousand sons, and a son, thousand fathers. This created misunderstanding
in many.As soon as children are born, they will be taken by officers appointed for the purpose.
PLATO’S ARGUMENTS
The emotive and impulsive attachment to the family fetters the absolute devotion to the state
and concern for their offspring causes selfish tendencies detrimental to social unity and harmony.
Family is hurdle for women’s equal education and function as guardians and hence an obstruction
in their emancipation.
Abolition of the institutions of marriage and family is essential for the moral development of
guardians. Due to marriage men and women carelessly indulge into sexual intercourse, whenever
they wish to instead of controlled and disciplined sex to produce worthy children.
The maintenance of family needs wealth implying that the involvements of the guardians in
economic activities interfering into the realm of economic producers deviating from their political
duties in violation of the principle of justice.
Those who exercise political power should have no economic motives, and those who are
engaged in economic activities should have no share in political power.
According to Barker, Plato’s Communism had many novel objectives - It is a scheme of eugenics, a scheme
for emancipation of women, people integrated to state, men & women having freedom to develop their
highest capabilities.
(Criticism) According to Karl Popper: (Book- “The open society & its enemies.)
It is also doubtful if the state-controlled mating would ever be workable; it would rather reduce
men and women to the levels of mere animals by suggesting temporary marital relationship.
The whole scheme of communism is too rigid, too strict, and too stringent.
Plato's communism of families suggests a system of marriage which is neither monogamy, nor
bigamy, nor polygamy, nor polyandry.
Plato’s communism is too rigid, too strict, too ideal (utopian) & far from realities.
CRITICISM BY ARISTOTLE:
On Family - Family is emotional stability. Time tested institution. Family is a unit of society. Communism
of wives/family cannot be considered progressive, it will be rather going back to barbaric ages.
Similarities:
Both are alike in the sense that both ignore the individuality of the citizens and are based on
the supremacy of the state which absorbs the individual.
Both are totalitarian covering various aspects of the life of the individual.
Both are based on the ignorance of the essentials of human nature and human instincts.
Further, both are calculated to eliminate unregulated economic competition based on
individualism.
Platonic communism and modern communism both mean to promote political unity and social
harmony and to develop the sense of social service.
Differences:
Plato’s communism has a political objective - an economic solution of a political ailment.
Plato’s communism is limited to only two upper classes – the rulers and the auxiliaries while
Marx’s communism applies to the whole society.
As Prof. C.C. Maxey has rightly pointed out, Plato's basis of communism is material temptation
and it’s nature is individualist while Marx' basis is the growth of social evils, which result from
the accumulation of private property in addition to the above differences.
Plato's communism was calculated to prevent concentration of economic and political power
in the same hands; modern communism gives political power to the producing class.
Plato's communism involved abolition of private family life and private property; modern
communism intends to abolish private property only.
Prominent statements
No law or ordinance can be mightier than knowledge.
Law is a reason free from Passion.
Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Until philosophers are rulers or rulers learn philosophy there is no predicament to human life.
It is foolish to limit an expert practitioner of medicine with the book of medicine.
Logic: It is foolish to limit an expert practitioner of medicine with Book of medicine. Knowledge is the
merit which qualifies the ruler to rule the people. Ought to know the science of politics, and uses it artist
uses his/her art. Peasant is a peasant because he knows the job of tilling; similarly a ruler is a ruler because
he knows the job of ruling. Like artist Plato only put one limitation - “Philosopher king can not change the
constitution”
CRITICISM:
Aristotle - It is not possible to find Philosopher king & even if we find, there is no guarantee that he will
not be corrupt. Appetite may dominate over reason. “Plato is sacrificing good for the sake of best.”
Evaluation of Plato:
Criticism
Karl Popper
Plato's philosophy sought to perpetuate or eternalise the ideal - the ideal of anti-democracy, anti-
change and anti-open society. "Plato's fundamental demands can be expressed in either of the
two formulas, the first corresponding to his idealist theory of change and rest, the second to
naturalism.
The idealist formula is: Arrest all political change. Change is evil, rest divine. All change can be
arrested if the state is made an exact copy of its original, i.e. Idea of the city.
Should it be asked how this is practicable, we can reply with the naturalistic formula: Back to the
Nature. Back to the original state of our forefathers, the primitive state founded in accordance
with human nature, and therefore, stable; back to the tribal patriarchy of the time before the fall,
to the natural class rule of the wise few over the ignorant many."
John Jay Chapman, a devout anti - Platonist, called Plato 'the prince of conjures’.
R.H.S. Crossman says that “Plato was wrong, both for his times and for ours”. Plato’s endeavour was to
construct a perfect society, free of three evil that confronted Athens: class war, bad government and bad
education. Crossman found Plato making erroneous assumptions and these were; (a) the poor faith he
had in the ability and intelligence of common man, (b) his mistaken belief that a just government could
be established by a revolution, and (c) the final truth could be discovered by suppressing freedom of
thought.
PLATO AS ANTI-DEMOCRAT
Plato equated democratization with moral corruption and degradation, and endeavoured to
reform and revolutionized the general quality of human life.
He attacked democracy as the incompetence and ignorance of politicians gave rise to
factionalism, extreme violence and partisan politics which were the causes of political instability.
He blamed the restored democracy in Athens for the death of Socrates.
He tried to infuse the communitarian spirit of Sparta into the individualistic Athenian society, and
temper democracy with aristocratic value.
Crossman concluded that Plato made the profoundest attack on the basic premises of liberal
democracy, namely equality, freedom and self-government, because he had very little faith in the
capacity of each individual for self-development, freedom and individuality. Plato offered
security, prosperity and the noble lie through the Myth of Metals.
Berlin pointed out that Plato did not grant the individual the freedom of choice, which was an
inalienable human right. Plato also rejected pluralism, for he believed that there was a solution
to all human problems and the universe was directed towards a single goal.
But on the other hand Levinson had decided in favour of Plato stating that fascism and Platonism
are incomparable. Fascism is a hodge podge of ideologies whereas Plato had a genuine desire to
provide the citizens a life of excellence and harmony.
Rajeev Bhargava has criticised Popper as being ideologically biased. But yet it is clear that whether Plato
was protofascist or not but after Popper’s work no one will see Plato in the same way as it used to be.
Model questions