Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IrMO_2_2005
IrMO_2_2005
IrMO_2_2005
1. Let ABC be a triangle, and let X be a point on the side AB that is not A or
B. Let P be the incentre of the triangle ACX, Q the incentre of the triangle
BCX and M the midpoint of the segment P Q. Show that |M C| > |M X|.
3. Suppose
w
that x is an integer and y, z, w are odd integers. Show that 17 divides
yz yz
x −x .
[Note: Given a sequence of integers an , n = 1, 2, . . ., the terms bn , n = 1, 2, . . .,
a
a a 1
a 1 a 2
of its sequence of “towers”, a1 , aa21 , a32 , a43 , . . ., are defined recursively as
follows: b1 = a1 , bn+1 = abn+1
n
, n = 1, 2, . . ..]
1. Let ABC be a triangle, and let X be a point on the side AB that is not A or
B. Let P be the incentre of the triangle ACX, Q the incentre of the triangle
BCX and M the midpoint of the segment P Q. Show that |M C| > |M X|.
[JC]
Solution. Let Nj be the number that has been constructed after j steps, and
let dj be the jth digit, P
so that Nj = d1 d2 d3 . . . dj . A wins if N2005 is divisible
by 9, or equivalently if 2005
j=1 dj ≡ 0 mod 9 .
(1)
Let Wj be the set of remainders mod 9 that guarantees a win for the player
who has just picked the jth digit if that player pursues an optimal strategy
from there on. Thus W2005 = {0}, and we can then work out Wj by backwards
induction using the following rule:
3. Suppose
w
that x is an integer and y, z, w are odd integers. Show that 17 divides
yz yz
x − x . [KH]
w
Solution. z, w odd ⇒ z w ≡ z (mod 4) ⇒ y z ≡ y z (mod 16) (since y 4 ≡ 1
zw z
(mod 16)) ⇒ xy ≡ xy (mod 17) since either 17|x or x16 ≡ 1 (mod 17).
Since
1 (mod 10) if k ≡0 (mod 4)
7 (mod 10) if k ≡1 (mod 4)
7k ≡
9 (mod 10) if k ≡2 (mod 4)
3 (mod 10) if k ≡3 (mod 4)
and 1000 ≡ 0 (mod 4), √ 2m ≡ 2 (mod 10). So the last digit of the integer
x + y is 2. Now 7 − 2 10 is approximately 0.7, so y < 0.01. It follows that
x = (x + y) − y = (. . . 2) − y = . . . 1.9 . . .. The first digit to the left of the
decimal point is 1 and the first digit to the right of the decimal point is 9.
√
Problem 2 Let n ∈ N. Determine the integer part of (2 + 3)n .
Note that the ordered pair of integers ((m + n)/2, (m − n)/2) belongs to S, so
S is not empty. Note also that (x, y) ∈ S implies that (−x, −y) ∈ S and that
(y, x) ∈ S also. Note further that if (0, z) ∈ S
for some integer z, then k is a perfect square, as required.
Suppose then that no integer z exists with (0, z) ∈ S. Let (a, b) ∈ S be such
that | a | is least possible among all pairs (x, y) ∈ S. Note that we may assume
that a =| a | is positive. The quadratic equation
has two solutions, one of which, b, is an integer. Hence both solutions, b1 and
b2 , say, are integers. Note that b1 + b2 = 4ka − 2a and that b1 b2 = a2 − k.
Hence
Suppose first that k < 0. Then b1 + b2 < 0 and b1 b2 > 0. So b1 and b2 are
both negative. The minimality of a implies that a + b1 and a + b2 are both
nonnegative, so, by (1), k(4a2 − 1) ≥ 0, thus forcing k = 0.
Hence k ≥ 0. If k > 0, then b1 + b2 > 0 and (a + b1 )(a + b2 ) > 0, so, by
minimality of a, b1 and b2 are both positive. But then the fact that b1 b2 =
a2 − k < a2 contradicts the minimality of a. Hence k = 0, and (0, 0) ∈ S. This
is a contradiction. So the result is proved.
Remark. It is difficult to find pairs (m, n) satisfying the hypotheses with
m 6= ±n or n 6= ±1. However, such pairs do exist, for example (m, n) =
(105, 99).
Now try the following problem which was set for the IMO in 1988.