The American Judicial System: A Very

Short Introduction Charles L. Zelden

Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmass.com/product/the-american-judicial-system-a-very-short-introductio
n-charles-l-zelden/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...

American Immigration: A Very Short Introduction (Very

Short Introductions) 1st Edition, (Ebook PDF)

https://ebookmass.com/product/american-immigration-a-very-short-
introduction-very-short-introductions-1st-edition-ebook-pdf/

The Spartans: a Very Short Introduction Andrew J.

Bayliss

https://ebookmass.com/product/the-spartans-a-very-short-
introduction-andrew-j-bayliss/

British Cinema: A Very Short Introduction 1st Edition

Charles Barr

https://ebookmass.com/product/british-cinema-a-very-short-
introduction-1st-edition-charles-barr/

American Political Parties and Elections: A Very Short

Introduction , 3rd Edition L. Sandy Maisel

https://ebookmass.com/product/american-political-parties-and-
elections-a-very-short-introduction-3rd-edition-l-sandy-maisel/
The Spartans: A Very Short Introduction Andrew J.
Bayliss

https://ebookmass.com/product/the-spartans-a-very-short-
introduction-andrew-j-bayliss-2/

Nanotechnology: A Very Short Introduction Philip

Moriarty

https://ebookmass.com/product/nanotechnology-a-very-short-
introduction-philip-moriarty/

Democracy: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short

Introductions) 2023rd Edition Zack

https://ebookmass.com/product/democracy-a-very-short-
introduction-very-short-introductions-2023rd-edition-zack/

African American History: A Very Short Introduction

10th Edition Jonathan Scott Holloway

https://ebookmass.com/product/african-american-history-a-very-
short-introduction-10th-edition-jonathan-scott-holloway/

Globalization: A Very Short Introduction (Very

Introductions) 4th Edition

https://ebookmass.com/product/globalization-a-very-short-
introduction-very-introductions-4th-edition/
The American Judicial System: A Very Short Introduction
 VERY SHORT INTRODUCTIONS are for anyone wanting a stimulating and
accessible way into a new subject. They are written by experts, and have
been translated into more than 45 different languages.
The series began in 1995, and now covers a wide variety of topics in every
discipline. The VSI library currently contains over 700 volumes—a Very Short
Introduction to everything from Psychology and Philosophy of Science to
American History and Relativity—and continues to grow in every subject
area.

Very Short Introductions available now:

ABOLITIONISM Richard S. Newman

THE ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS Charles L. Cohen
ACCOUNTING Christopher Nobes
ADOLESCENCE Peter K. Smith
THEODOR W. ADORNO Andrew Bowie
ADVERTISING Winston Fletcher
AERIAL WARFARE Frank Ledwidge
AESTHETICS Bence Nanay
AFRICAN AMERICAN RELIGION Eddie S. Glaude Jr
AFRICAN HISTORY John Parker and Richard Rathbone
AFRICAN POLITICS Ian Taylor
AFRICAN RELIGIONS Jacob K. Olupona
AGEING Nancy A. Pachana
AGNOSTICISM Robin Le Poidevin
AGRICULTURE Paul Brassley and Richard Soffe
ALEXANDER THE GREAT Hugh Bowden
ALGEBRA Peter M. Higgins
AMERICAN BUSINESS HISTORY Walter A. Friedman
AMERICAN CULTURAL HISTORY Eric Avila
AMERICAN FOREIGN RELATIONS Andrew Preston
AMERICAN HISTORY Paul S. Boyer
AMERICAN IMMIGRATION David A. Gerber
AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL HISTORY Jennifer Ratner-Rosenhagen
THE AMERICAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM Charles L. Zelden
AMERICAN LEGAL HISTORY G. Edward White
AMERICAN MILITARY HISTORY Joseph T. Glatthaar
AMERICAN NAVAL HISTORY Craig L. Symonds
AMERICAN POETRY David Caplan
AMERICAN POLITICAL HISTORY Donald Critchlow
AMERICAN POLITICAL PARTIES AND ELECTIONS L. Sandy Maisel
AMERICAN POLITICS Richard M. Valelly
THE AMERICAN PRESIDENCY Charles O. Jones
THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION Robert J. Allison
AMERICAN SLAVERY Heather Andrea Williams
THE AMERICAN SOUTH Charles Reagan Wilson
THE AMERICAN WEST Stephen Aron
AMERICAN WOMEN’S HISTORY Susan Ware
AMPHIBIANS T. S. Kemp
ANAESTHESIA Aidan O’Donnell
ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY Michael Beaney
ANARCHISM Colin Ward
ANCIENT ASSYRIA Karen Radner
ANCIENT EGYPT Ian Shaw
ANCIENT EGYPTIAN ART AND ARCHITECTURE Christina Riggs
ANCIENT GREECE Paul Cartledge
THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST Amanda H. Podany
ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY Julia Annas
ANCIENT WARFARE Harry Sidebottom
ANGELS David Albert Jones
ANGLICANISM Mark Chapman
THE ANGLO-SAXON AGE John Blair
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR Tristram D. Wyatt
THE ANIMAL KINGDOM Peter Holland
ANIMAL RIGHTS David DeGrazia
THE ANTARCTIC Klaus Dodds
ANTHROPOCENE Erle C. Ellis
ANTISEMITISM Steven Beller
ANXIETY Daniel Freeman and Jason Freeman
THE APOCRYPHAL GOSPELS Paul Foster
APPLIED MATHEMATICS Alain Goriely
THOMAS AQUINAS Fergus Kerr
ARBITRATION Thomas Schultz and Thomas Grant
ARCHAEOLOGY Paul Bahn
ARCHITECTURE Andrew Ballantyne
THE ARCTIC Klaus Dodds and Jamie Woodward
ARISTOCRACY William Doyle
ARISTOTLE Jonathan Barnes
ART HISTORY Dana Arnold
ART THEORY Cynthia Freeland
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Margaret A. Boden
ASIAN AMERICAN HISTORY Madeline Y. Hsu
ASTROBIOLOGY David C. Catling
ASTROPHYSICS James Binney
ATHEISM Julian Baggini
THE ATMOSPHERE Paul I. Palmer
AUGUSTINE Henry Chadwick
JANE AUSTEN Tom Keymer
AUSTRALIA Kenneth Morgan
AUTISM Uta Frith
AUTOBIOGRAPHY Laura Marcus
THE AVANT GARDE David Cottington
THE AZTECS Davíd Carrasco
BABYLONIA Trevor Bryce
BACTERIA Sebastian G. B. Amyes
BANKING John Goddard and John O. S. Wilson
BARTHES Jonathan Culler
THE BEATS David Sterritt
BEAUTY Roger Scruton
LUDWIG VAN BEETHOVEN Mark Evan Bonds
BEHAVIOURAL ECONOMICS Michelle Baddeley
BESTSELLERS John Sutherland
THE BIBLE John Riches
BIBLICAL ARCHAEOLOGY Eric H. Cline
BIG DATA Dawn E. Holmes
BIOCHEMISTRY Mark Lorch
BIOGEOGRAPHY Mark V. Lomolino
BIOGRAPHY Hermione Lee
BIOMETRICS Michael Fairhurst
ELIZABETH BISHOP Jonathan F. S. Post
BLACK HOLES Katherine Blundell
BLASPHEMY Yvonne Sherwood
BLOOD Chris Cooper
THE BLUES Elijah Wald
THE BODY Chris Shilling
NIELS BOHR J. L. Heilbron
THE BOOK OF COMMON PRAYER Brian Cummings
THE BOOK OF MORMON Terryl Givens
BORDERS Alexander C. Diener and Joshua Hagen
THE BRAIN Michael O’Shea
BRANDING Robert Jones
THE BRICS Andrew F. Cooper
THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION Martin Loughlin
THE BRITISH EMPIRE Ashley Jackson
BRITISH POLITICS Tony Wright
BUDDHA Michael Carrithers
BUDDHISM Damien Keown
BUDDHIST ETHICS Damien Keown
BYZANTIUM Peter Sarris
CALVINISM Jon Balserak
ALBERT CAMUS Oliver Gloag
CANADA Donald Wright
CANCER Nicholas James
CAPITALISM James Fulcher
CATHOLICISM Gerald O’Collins
CAUSATION Stephen Mumford and Rani Lill Anjum
THE CELL Terence Allen and Graham Cowling
THE CELTS Barry Cunliffe
CHAOS Leonard Smith
GEOFFREY CHAUCER David Wallace
CHEMISTRY Peter Atkins
CHILD PSYCHOLOGY Usha Goswami
CHILDREN’S LITERATURE Kimberley Reynolds
CHINESE LITERATURE Sabina Knight
CHOICE THEORY Michael Allingham
CHRISTIAN ART Beth Williamson
CHRISTIAN ETHICS D. Stephen Long
CHRISTIANITY Linda Woodhead
CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS Russell Foster and Leon Kreitzman
CITIZENSHIP Richard Bellamy
CITY PLANNING Carl Abbott
CIVIL ENGINEERING David Muir Wood
CLASSICAL LITERATURE William Allan
CLASSICAL MYTHOLOGY Helen Morales
CLASSICS Mary Beard and John Henderson
CLAUSEWITZ Michael Howard
CLIMATE Mark Maslin
CLIMATE CHANGE Mark Maslin
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY Susan Llewelyn and Katie Aafjes-van Doorn
COGNITIVE BEHAVIOURAL THERAPY Freda McManus
COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE Richard Passingham
THE COLD WAR Robert J. McMahon
COLONIAL AMERICA Alan Taylor
COLONIAL LATIN AMERICAN LITERATURE Rolena Adorno
COMBINATORICS Robin Wilson
COMEDY Matthew Bevis
COMMUNISM Leslie Holmes
COMPARATIVE LITERATURE Ben Hutchinson
COMPETITION AND ANTITRUST LAW Ariel Ezrachi
COMPLEXITY John H. Holland
THE COMPUTER Darrel Ince
COMPUTER SCIENCE Subrata Dasgupta
CONCENTRATION CAMPS Dan Stone
CONFUCIANISM Daniel K. Gardner
THE CONQUISTADORS Matthew Restall and Felipe Fernández-Armesto
CONSCIENCE Paul Strohm
CONSCIOUSNESS Susan Blackmore
CONTEMPORARY ART Julian Stallabrass
CONTEMPORARY FICTION Robert Eaglestone
CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY Simon Critchley
COPERNICUS Owen Gingerich
CORAL REEFS Charles Sheppard
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Jeremy Moon
CORRUPTION Leslie Holmes
COSMOLOGY Peter Coles
COUNTRY MUSIC Richard Carlin
CREATIVITY Vlad Glăveanu
CRIME FICTION Richard Bradford
CRIMINAL JUSTICE Julian V. Roberts
CRIMINOLOGY Tim Newburn
CRITICAL THEORY Stephen Eric Bronner
THE CRUSADES Christopher Tyerman
CRYPTOGRAPHY Fred Piper and Sean Murphy
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY A. M. Glazer
THE CULTURAL REVOLUTION Richard Curt Kraus
DADA AND SURREALISM David Hopkins
DANTE Peter Hainsworth and David Robey
DARWIN Jonathan Howard
THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS Timothy H. Lim
DECADENCE David Weir
DECOLONIZATION Dane Kennedy
DEMENTIA Kathleen Taylor
DEMOCRACY Bernard Crick
DEMOGRAPHY Sarah Harper
DEPRESSION Jan Scott and Mary Jane Tacchi
DERRIDA Simon Glendinning
DESCARTES Tom Sorell
DESERTS Nick Middleton
DESIGN John Heskett
DEVELOPMENT Ian Goldin
DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY Lewis Wolpert
THE DEVIL Darren Oldridge
DIASPORA Kevin Kenny
CHARLES DICKENS Jenny Hartley
DICTIONARIES Lynda Mugglestone
DINOSAURS David Norman
DIPLOMATIC HISTORY Joseph M. Siracusa
DOCUMENTARY FILM Patricia Aufderheide
DREAMING J. Allan Hobson
DRUGS Les Iversen
DRUIDS Barry Cunliffe
DYNASTY Jeroen Duindam
DYSLEXIA Margaret J. Snowling
EARLY MUSIC Thomas Forrest Kelly
THE EARTH Martin Redfern
EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE Tim Lenton
ECOLOGY Jaboury Ghazoul
ECONOMICS Partha Dasgupta
EDUCATION Gary Thomas
EGYPTIAN MYTH Geraldine Pinch
EIGHTEENTH‑CENTURY BRITAIN Paul Langford
THE ELEMENTS Philip Ball
EMOTION Dylan Evans
EMPIRE Stephen Howe
EMPLOYMENT LAW David Cabrelli
ENERGY SYSTEMS Nick Jenkins
ENGELS Terrell Carver
ENGINEERING David Blockley
THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE Simon Horobin
ENGLISH LITERATURE Jonathan Bate
THE ENLIGHTENMENT John Robertson
ENTREPRENEURSHIP Paul Westhead and Mike Wright
ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS Stephen Smith
ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS Robin Attfield
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW Elizabeth Fisher
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS Andrew Dobson
ENZYMES Paul Engel
EPICUREANISM Catherine Wilson
EPIDEMIOLOGY Rodolfo Saracci
ETHICS Simon Blackburn
ETHNOMUSICOLOGY Timothy Rice
THE ETRUSCANS Christopher Smith
EUGENICS Philippa Levine
THE EUROPEAN UNION Simon Usherwood and John Pinder
EUROPEAN UNION LAW Anthony Arnull
EVANGELICALISM John Stackhouse
EVOLUTION Brian and Deborah Charlesworth
EXISTENTIALISM Thomas Flynn
EXPLORATION Stewart A. Weaver
EXTINCTION Paul B. Wignall
THE EYE Michael Land
FAIRY TALE Marina Warner
FAMILY LAW Jonathan Herring
MICHAEL FARADAY Frank A. J. L. James
FASCISM Kevin Passmore
FASHION Rebecca Arnold
FEDERALISM Mark J. Rozell and Clyde Wilcox
FEMINISM Margaret Walters
FILM Michael Wood
FILM MUSIC Kathryn Kalinak
FILM NOIR James Naremore
FIRE Andrew C. Scott
THE FIRST WORLD WAR Michael Howard
FLUID MECHANICS Eric Lauga
FOLK MUSIC Mark Slobin
FOOD John Krebs
FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY David Canter
FORENSIC SCIENCE Jim Fraser
FORESTS Jaboury Ghazoul
FOSSILS Keith Thomson
FOUCAULT Gary Gutting
THE FOUNDING FATHERS R. B. Bernstein
FRACTALS Kenneth Falconer
FREE SPEECH Nigel Warburton
FREE WILL Thomas Pink
FREEMASONRY Andreas Önnerfors
FRENCH LITERATURE John D. Lyons
FRENCH PHILOSOPHY Stephen Gaukroger and Knox Peden
THE FRENCH REVOLUTION William Doyle
FREUD Anthony Storr
FUNDAMENTALISM Malise Ruthven
FUNGI Nicholas P. Money
THE FUTURE Jennifer M. Gidley
GALAXIES John Gribbin
GALILEO Stillman Drake
GAME THEORY Ken Binmore
GANDHI Bhikhu Parekh
GARDEN HISTORY Gordon Campbell
GENES Jonathan Slack
GENIUS Andrew Robinson
GENOMICS John Archibald
GEOGRAPHY John Matthews and David Herbert
GEOLOGY Jan Zalasiewicz
GEOMETRY Maciej Dunajski
GEOPHYSICS William Lowrie
GEOPOLITICS Klaus Dodds
GERMAN LITERATURE Nicholas Boyle
GERMAN PHILOSOPHY Andrew Bowie
THE GHETTO Bryan Cheyette
GLACIATION David J. A. Evans
GLOBAL CATASTROPHES Bill McGuire
GLOBAL ECONOMIC HISTORY Robert C. Allen
GLOBAL ISLAM Nile Green
GLOBALIZATION Manfred B. Steger
GOD John Bowker
GOETHE Ritchie Robertson
THE GOTHIC Nick Groom
GOVERNANCE Mark Bevir
GRAVITY Timothy Clifton
THE GREAT DEPRESSION AND THE NEW DEAL Eric Rauchway
HABEAS CORPUS Amanda Tyler
HABERMAS James Gordon Finlayson
THE HABSBURG EMPIRE Martyn Rady
HAPPINESS Daniel M. Haybron
THE HARLEM RENAISSANCE Cheryl A. Wall
THE HEBREW BIBLE AS LITERATURE Tod Linafelt
HEGEL Peter Singer
HEIDEGGER Michael Inwood
THE HELLENISTIC AGE Peter Thonemann
HEREDITY John Waller
HERMENEUTICS Jens Zimmermann
HERODOTUS Jennifer T. Roberts
HIEROGLYPHS Penelope Wilson
HINDUISM Kim Knott
HISTORY John H. Arnold
THE HISTORY OF ASTRONOMY Michael Hoskin
THE HISTORY OF CHEMISTRY William H. Brock
THE HISTORY OF CHILDHOOD James Marten
THE HISTORY OF CINEMA Geoffrey Nowell-Smith
THE HISTORY OF LIFE Michael Benton
THE HISTORY OF MATHEMATICS Jacqueline Stedall
THE HISTORY OF MEDICINE William Bynum
THE HISTORY OF PHYSICS J. L. Heilbron
THE HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT Richard Whatmore
THE HISTORY OF TIME Leofranc Holford‑Strevens
HIV AND AIDS Alan Whiteside
HOBBES Richard Tuck
HOLLYWOOD Peter Decherney
THE HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE Joachim Whaley
HOME Michael Allen Fox
HOMER Barbara Graziosi
HORMONES Martin Luck
HORROR Darryl Jones
HUMAN ANATOMY Leslie Klenerman
HUMAN EVOLUTION Bernard Wood
HUMAN PHYSIOLOGY Jamie A. Davies
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Adrian Wilkinson
HUMAN RIGHTS Andrew Clapham
HUMANISM Stephen Law
HUME James A. Harris
HUMOUR Noël Carroll
THE ICE AGE Jamie Woodward
IDENTITY Florian Coulmas
IDEOLOGY Michael Freeden
THE IMMUNE SYSTEM Paul Klenerman
INDIAN CINEMA Ashish Rajadhyaksha
INDIAN PHILOSOPHY Sue Hamilton
THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION Robert C. Allen
INFECTIOUS DISEASE Marta L. Wayne and Benjamin M. Bolker
INFINITY Ian Stewart
INFORMATION Luciano Floridi
INNOVATION Mark Dodgson and David Gann
INSECTS Simon Leather
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Siva Vaidhyanathan
INTELLIGENCE Ian J. Deary
INTERNATIONAL LAW Vaughan Lowe
INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION Khalid Koser
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Christian Reus-Smit
INTERNATIONAL SECURITY Christopher S. Browning
IRAN Ali M. Ansari
ISLAM Malise Ruthven
ISLAMIC HISTORY Adam Silverstein
ISLAMIC LAW Mashood A. Baderin
ISOTOPES Rob Ellam
ITALIAN LITERATURE Peter Hainsworth and David Robey
HENRY JAMES Susan L. Mizruchi
JESUS Richard Bauckham
JEWISH HISTORY David N. Myers
JEWISH LITERATURE Ilan Stavans
JOURNALISM Ian Hargreaves
JAMES JOYCE Colin MacCabe
JUDAISM Norman Solomon
JUNG Anthony Stevens
KABBALAH Joseph Dan
KAFKA Ritchie Robertson
KANT Roger Scruton
KEYNES Robert Skidelsky
KIERKEGAARD Patrick Gardiner
KNOWLEDGE Jennifer Nagel
THE KORAN Michael Cook
KOREA Michael J. Seth
LAKES Warwick F. Vincent
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Ian H. Thompson
LANDSCAPES AND GEOMORPHOLOGY Andrew Goudie and Heather Viles
LANGUAGES Stephen R. Anderson
LATE ANTIQUITY Gillian Clark
LAW Raymond Wacks
THE LAWS OF THERMODYNAMICS Peter Atkins
LEADERSHIP Keith Grint
LEARNING Mark Haselgrove
LEIBNIZ Maria Rosa Antognazza
C. S. LEWIS James Como
LIBERALISM Michael Freeden
LIGHT Ian Walmsley
LINCOLN Allen C. Guelzo
LINGUISTICS Peter Matthews
LITERARY THEORY Jonathan Culler
LOCKE John Dunn
LOGIC Graham Priest
LOVE Ronald de Sousa
MARTIN LUTHER Scott H. Hendrix
MACHIAVELLI Quentin Skinner
MADNESS Andrew Scull
MAGIC Owen Davies
MAGNA CARTA Nicholas Vincent
MAGNETISM Stephen Blundell
MALTHUS Donald Winch
MAMMALS T. S. Kemp
MANAGEMENT John Hendry
NELSON MANDELA Elleke Boehmer
MAO Delia Davin
MARINE BIOLOGY Philip V. Mladenov
MARKETING Kenneth Le Meunier-FitzHugh
THE MARQUIS DE SADE John Phillips
MARTYRDOM Jolyon Mitchell
MARX Peter Singer
MATERIALS Christopher Hall
MATHEMATICAL FINANCE Mark H. A. Davis
MATHEMATICS Timothy Gowers
MATTER Geoff Cottrell
THE MAYA Matthew Restall and Amara Solari
THE MEANING OF LIFE Terry Eagleton
MEASUREMENT David Hand
MEDICAL ETHICS Michael Dunn and Tony Hope
MEDICAL LAW Charles Foster
MEDIEVAL BRITAIN John Gillingham and Ralph A. Griffiths
MEDIEVAL LITERATURE Elaine Treharne
MEDIEVAL PHILOSOPHY John Marenbon
MEMORY Jonathan K. Foster
METAPHYSICS Stephen Mumford
METHODISM William J. Abraham
THE MEXICAN REVOLUTION Alan Knight
MICROBIOLOGY Nicholas P. Money
MICROECONOMICS Avinash Dixit
MICROSCOPY Terence Allen
THE MIDDLE AGES Miri Rubin
MILITARY JUSTICE Eugene R. Fidell
MILITARY STRATEGY Antulio J. Echevarria II
JOHN STUART MILL Gregory Claeys
MINERALS David Vaughan
MIRACLES Yujin Nagasawa
MODERN ARCHITECTURE Adam Sharr
MODERN ART David Cottington
MODERN BRAZIL Anthony W. Pereira
MODERN CHINA Rana Mitter
MODERN DRAMA Kirsten E. Shepherd-Barr
MODERN FRANCE Vanessa R. Schwartz
MODERN INDIA Craig Jeffrey
MODERN IRELAND Senia Pašeta
MODERN ITALY Anna Cento Bull
MODERN JAPAN Christopher Goto-Jones
MODERN LATIN AMERICAN LITERATURE Roberto González Echevarría
MODERN WAR Richard English
MODERNISM Christopher Butler
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Aysha Divan and Janice A. Royds
MOLECULES Philip Ball
MONASTICISM Stephen J. Davis
THE MONGOLS Morris Rossabi
MONTAIGNE William M. Hamlin
MOONS David A. Rothery
MORMONISM Richard Lyman Bushman
MOUNTAINS Martin F. Price
MUHAMMAD Jonathan A. C. Brown
MULTICULTURALISM Ali Rattansi
MULTILINGUALISM John C. Maher
MUSIC Nicholas Cook
MUSIC AND TECHNOLOGY Mark Katz
MYTH Robert A. Segal
NAPOLEON David Bell
THE NAPOLEONIC WARS Mike Rapport
NATIONALISM Steven Grosby
NATIVE AMERICAN LITERATURE Sean Teuton
NAVIGATION Jim Bennett
NAZI GERMANY Jane Caplan
NEGOTIATION Carrie Menkel-Meadow
NEOLIBERALISM Manfred B. Steger and Ravi K. Roy
NETWORKS Guido Caldarelli and Michele Catanzaro
THE NEW TESTAMENT Luke Timothy Johnson
THE NEW TESTAMENT AS LITERATURE Kyle Keefer
NEWTON Robert Iliffe
NIETZSCHE Michael Tanner
NINETEENTH‑CENTURY BRITAIN Christopher Harvie and H. C. G. Matthew
THE NORMAN CONQUEST George Garnett
NORTH AMERICAN INDIANS Theda Perdue and Michael D. Green
NORTHERN IRELAND Marc Mulholland
NOTHING Frank Close
NUCLEAR PHYSICS Frank Close
NUCLEAR POWER Maxwell Irvine
NUCLEAR WEAPONS Joseph M. Siracusa
NUMBER THEORY Robin Wilson
NUMBERS Peter M. Higgins
NUTRITION David A. Bender
OBJECTIVITY Stephen Gaukroger
OCEANS Dorrik Stow
THE OLD TESTAMENT Michael D. Coogan
THE ORCHESTRA D. Kern Holoman
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY Graham Patrick
ORGANIZATIONS Mary Jo Hatch
ORGANIZED CRIME Georgios A. Antonopoulos and Georgios Papanicolaou
ORTHODOX CHRISTIANITY A. Edward Siecienski
OVID Llewelyn Morgan
PAGANISM Owen Davies
PAKISTAN Pippa Virdee
THE PALESTINIAN-ISRAELI CONFLICT Martin Bunton
PANDEMICS Christian W. McMillen
PARTICLE PHYSICS Frank Close
PAUL E. P. Sanders
PEACE Oliver P. Richmond
PENTECOSTALISM William K. Kay
PERCEPTION Brian Rogers
THE PERIODIC TABLE Eric R. Scerri
PHILOSOPHICAL METHOD Timothy Williamson
PHILOSOPHY Edward Craig
PHILOSOPHY IN THE ISLAMIC WORLD Peter Adamson
PHILOSOPHY OF BIOLOGY Samir Okasha
PHILOSOPHY OF LAW Raymond Wacks
PHILOSOPHY OF MIND Barbara Gail Montero
PHILOSOPHY OF PHYSICS David Wallace
PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION Tim Bayne
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Samir Okasha
PHOTOGRAPHY Steve Edwards
PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY Peter Atkins
PHYSICS Sidney Perkowitz
PILGRIMAGE Ian Reader
PLAGUE Paul Slack
PLANETARY SYSTEMS Raymond T. Pierrehumbert
PLANETS David A. Rothery
PLANTS Timothy Walker
PLATE TECTONICS Peter Molnar
PLATO Julia Annas
POETRY Bernard O’Donoghue
POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY David Miller
POLITICS Kenneth Minogue
POLYGAMY Sarah M. S. Pearsall
POPULISM Cas Mudde and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser
POSTCOLONIALISM Robert Young
POSTMODERNISM Christopher Butler
POSTSTRUCTURALISM Catherine Belsey
POVERTY Philip N. Jefferson
PREHISTORY Chris Gosden
PRESOCRATIC PHILOSOPHY Catherine Osborne
PRIVACY Raymond Wacks
PROBABILITY John Haigh
PROGRESSIVISM Walter Nugent
PROHIBITION W. J. Rorabaugh
PROJECTS Andrew Davies
PROTESTANTISM Mark A. Noll
PSYCHIATRY Tom Burns
PSYCHOANALYSIS Daniel Pick
PSYCHOLOGY Gillian Butler and Freda McManus
PSYCHOLOGY OF MUSIC Elizabeth Hellmuth Margulis
PSYCHOPATHY Essi Viding
PSYCHOTHERAPY Tom Burns and Eva Burns-Lundgren
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Stella Z. Theodoulou and Ravi K. Roy
PUBLIC HEALTH Virginia Berridge
PURITANISM Francis J. Bremer
THE QUAKERS Pink Dandelion
QUANTUM THEORY John Polkinghorne
RACISM Ali Rattansi
RADIOACTIVITY Claudio Tuniz
RASTAFARI Ennis B. Edmonds
READING Belinda Jack
THE REAGAN REVOLUTION Gil Troy
REALITY Jan Westerhoff
RECONSTRUCTION Allen C. Guelzo
THE REFORMATION Peter Marshall
REFUGEES Gil Loescher
RELATIVITY Russell Stannard
RELIGION Thomas A. Tweed
RELIGION IN AMERICA Timothy Beal
THE RENAISSANCE Jerry Brotton
RENAISSANCE ART Geraldine A. Johnson
RENEWABLE ENERGY Nick Jelley
REPTILES T.S. Kemp
REVOLUTIONS Jack A. Goldstone
RHETORIC Richard Toye
RISK Baruch Fischhoff and John Kadvany
RITUAL Barry Stephenson
RIVERS Nick Middleton
ROBOTICS Alan Winfield
ROCKS Jan Zalasiewicz
ROMAN BRITAIN Peter Salway
THE ROMAN EMPIRE Christopher Kelly
THE ROMAN REPUBLIC David M. Gwynn
ROMANTICISM Michael Ferber
ROUSSEAU Robert Wokler
RUSSELL A. C. Grayling
THE RUSSIAN ECONOMY Richard Connolly
RUSSIAN HISTORY Geoffrey Hosking
RUSSIAN LITERATURE Catriona Kelly
THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION S. A. Smith
SAINTS Simon Yarrow
SAMURAI Michael Wert
SAVANNAS Peter A. Furley
SCEPTICISM Duncan Pritchard
SCHIZOPHRENIA Chris Frith and Eve Johnstone
SCHOPENHAUER Christopher Janaway
SCIENCE AND RELIGION Thomas Dixon and Adam R. Shapiro
SCIENCE FICTION David Seed
THE SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION Lawrence M. Principe
SCOTLAND Rab Houston
SECULARISM Andrew Copson
SEXUAL SELECTION Marlene Zuk and Leigh W. Simmons
SEXUALITY Véronique Mottier
WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE Stanley Wells
SHAKESPEARE’S COMEDIES Bart van Es
SHAKESPEARE’S SONNETS AND POEMS Jonathan F. S. Post
SHAKESPEARE’S TRAGEDIES Stanley Wells
GEORGE BERNARD SHAW Christopher Wixson
MARY SHELLEY Charlotte Gordon
THE SHORT STORY Andrew Kahn
SIKHISM Eleanor Nesbitt
SILENT FILM Donna Kornhaber
THE SILK ROAD James A. Millward
SLANG Jonathon Green
SLEEP Steven W. Lockley and Russell G. Foster
SMELL Matthew Cobb
ADAM SMITH Christopher J. Berry
SOCIAL AND CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY John Monaghan and Peter Just
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY Richard J. Crisp
SOCIAL WORK Sally Holland and Jonathan Scourfield
SOCIALISM Michael Newman
SOCIOLINGUISTICS John Edwards
SOCIOLOGY Steve Bruce
SOCRATES C. C. W. Taylor
SOFT MATTER Tom McLeish
SOUND Mike Goldsmith
SOUTHEAST ASIA James R. Rush
THE SOVIET UNION Stephen Lovell
THE SPANISH CIVIL WAR Helen Graham
SPANISH LITERATURE Jo Labanyi
THE SPARTANS Andrew Bayliss
SPINOZA Roger Scruton
SPIRITUALITY Philip Sheldrake
SPORT Mike Cronin
STARS Andrew King
STATISTICS David J. Hand
STEM CELLS Jonathan Slack
STOICISM Brad Inwood
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING David Blockley
STUART BRITAIN John Morrill
THE SUN Philip Judge
SUPERCONDUCTIVITY Stephen Blundell
SUPERSTITION Stuart Vyse
SYMMETRY Ian Stewart
SYNAESTHESIA Julia Simner
SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY Jamie A. Davies
SYSTEMS BIOLOGY Eberhard O. Voit
TAXATION Stephen Smith
TEETH Peter S. Ungar
TELESCOPES Geoff Cottrell
TERRORISM Charles Townshend
THEATRE Marvin Carlson
THEOLOGY David F. Ford
THINKING AND REASONING Jonathan St B. T. Evans
THOUGHT Tim Bayne
TIBETAN BUDDHISM Matthew T. Kapstein
TIDES David George Bowers and Emyr Martyn Roberts
TIME Jenann Ismael
TOCQUEVILLE Harvey C. Mansfield
LEO TOLSTOY Liza Knapp
TOPOLOGY Richard Earl
TRAGEDY Adrian Poole
TRANSLATION Matthew Reynolds
THE TREATY OF VERSAILLES Michael S. Neiberg
TRIGONOMETRY Glen Van Brummelen
THE TROJAN WAR Eric H. Cline
TRUST Katherine Hawley
THE TUDORS John Guy
TWENTIETH‑CENTURY BRITAIN Kenneth O. Morgan
TYPOGRAPHY Paul Luna
THE UNITED NATIONS Jussi M. Hanhimäki
UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES David Palfreyman and Paul Temple
THE U.S. CIVIL WAR Louis P. Masur
THE U.S. CONGRESS Donald A. Ritchie
THE U.S. CONSTITUTION David J. Bodenhamer
THE U.S. SUPREME COURT Linda Greenhouse
UTILITARIANISM Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek and Peter Singer
UTOPIANISM Lyman Tower Sargent
VETERINARY SCIENCE James Yeates
THE VIKINGS Julian D. Richards
VIOLENCE Philip Dwyer
THE VIRGIN MARY Mary Joan Winn Leith
THE VIRTUES Craig A. Boyd and Kevin Timpe
VIRUSES Dorothy H. Crawford
VOLCANOES Michael J. Branney and Jan Zalasiewicz
VOLTAIRE Nicholas Cronk
WAR AND RELIGION Jolyon Mitchell and Joshua Rey
WAR AND TECHNOLOGY Alex Roland
WATER John Finney
WAVES Mike Goldsmith
WEATHER Storm Dunlop
THE WELFARE STATE David Garland
WITCHCRAFT Malcolm Gaskill
WITTGENSTEIN A. C. Grayling
WORK Stephen Fineman
WORLD MUSIC Philip Bohlman
THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION Amrita Narlikar
WORLD WAR II Gerhard L. Weinberg
WRITING AND SCRIPT Andrew Robinson
ZIONISM Michael Stanislawski
ÉMILE ZOLA Brian Nelson

Available soon:
HANNAH ARENDT Dana Villa
MICROBIOMES Angela E. Douglas
NANOTECHNOLOGY Philip Moriarty
ANSELM Thomas Williams
GÖDEL’S THEOREM A. W. Moore

For more information visit our website

www.oup.com/vsi/
 Charles L. Zelden

THE AMERICAN JUDICIAL

SYSTEM
A Very Short Introduction
 Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the
University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing
worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and
certain other countries.
Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press
198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America.
© Oxford University Press 2022
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval
system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in
writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by license, or under
terms agreed with the appropriate reproduction rights organization. Inquiries concerning
reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department,
Oxford University Press, at the address above.
You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same
condition on any acquirer.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Zelden, Charles L., 1963- author.
Title: The American judicial system : a very short introduction / by Charles L. Zelden.
Description: New York : Oxford University Press, 2022. | Series: A very short introduction |
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2022018798 (print) | LCCN 2022018799 (ebook) | ISBN 9780190644918
(paperback) | ISBN 9780190644925 (ebook) | ISBN 9780190644932 (epub)
Subjects: LCSH: Justice, Administration of–United States. | Courts–United States. | Judicial
process–United States.
Classification: LCC KF8700 .Z45 2022 (print) | LCC KF8700 (ebook) | DDC 347.73–
dc23/eng/20220616
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2022018798
LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2022018799

1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2
Printed in the UK by
Ashford Colour Press Ltd, Gosport, Hampshire, on acid-free paper
Contents

Acknowledgments

List of illustrations

Preface: The contours of the American judicial system

1 Structures and jurisdictions

2 Roles and functions

3 Powers and motivations

4 People

5 Process

6 Politics and policy

Afterword

References

Further reading

Index
Acknowledgments

The truism that no book is written alone is especially apt in the case
of this book. What is presented here is the sum of almost thirty
years of teaching the judicial process at the undergraduate level.
The general points raised, and the examples given, have grown out
of my need to explain the technical world of the law and courts to
students who know almost nothing of either. I am grateful to those
students. Their questions, incomprehension, and misunderstandings
forced me to refine how I viewed and thus taught the judicial
system. This book is the beneficiary of those efforts.

I am also grateful to many scholars who helped me along the way.

As always, my first thanks must go to my graduate advisor, Harold
M. Hyman, who taught me history, the historian’s craft, and the law
as viewed through that lens. Thanks as well are owed to the judges
of the US District Court, Southern District of Texas—living and
passed—who trusted me to understand the workings of their court in
the writing of my dissertation and first book and whose willingness
to correct me when I got it wrong was also very educative.

R. B. Bernstein, Roger K. Newman, Craig Klafter, Josiah Daniel, Vicki

Toscano, and Timothy Dixon all read the manuscript at various
points in the writing process—in some cases, multiple times. Josiah
Daniel, Craig Klafter, and Craig Joyce also provided useful advice
about the workings of the judicial system along the way. I am
grateful to each for their time and knowledge and, for those who
read the manuscript, for their editorial vigor.

Of Nancy Toff and the staff at Oxford University Press, not enough
can be said. Nancy not only was patient as I tried (and succeeded!)
in stuffing a 100,000-word topic into a 35,000-word casing, but also
pushed me (despite my occasional complaints) to do more than just
describe the skeleton of the legal system but also explore its
physiology. The result is a much better book for the effort.

Thanks are due as well to the OUP blind readers who reviewed and
commented on the manuscript. Their insights helped catch some
potentially embarrassing factual mistakes and tightened the book’s
arguments and explanations immeasurably.

I must, as always, thank my family, as they suffered with me during

the writing of this book. They are the best.

Finally, I dedicate this book to Brad and Brian Cohen for a lifetime of
friendship and brotherhood. NSGs rule.
List of illustrations

1 The judicial pyramid

2 Town Square and historic Lee County, Texas, courthouse

© miochelmond/Shutterstock, 1405066991

3 Judge Roy Bean Saloon & Justice Court, Langtry, Texas, 1900
Library of Congress, tx0268

4 Traffic court, Washington, DC, 1925

Library of Congress, 2016850405

5 Lawyer questions a defendant

Drawing by William Leroy Jacobs, ca. 1912.
Library of Congress, 2010716903

6 George E. C. Hayes, Thurgood Marshall, and James M. Nabrit celebrate

victory in Brown v. Board of Education, May 17, 1954
AP Photo/File, 17264709679398

7 Poster for Joseph R. McCarthy’s campaign for circuit judge, 1940

Wisconsin Historical Society, WHI-48258

8 One of the first integrated juries, 1867

Drawing by James E. Taylor, Frank Leslie’s Illustrated Magazine, November 30, 1867,
Library of Congress, 96513248

9 Judge Pierre Leval gives jury instructions

Library of Congress, 2016652856
10 “Stonewalled,” Pat Oliphant, 1974
Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division, Lot 15351, no. 74 OLIPHANT ©
ANDREWS MCMEEL SYNDICATION. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.
Preface: The contours of the
American judicial system

The American judicial system is important. Courts can have as great

an impact on most Americans’ lives as, or in some instances greater
than, that of the president or Congress, a governor, or a state
legislature. This has been so since the founding of the American
constitutional system in 1789. Even so, most Americans (let alone
non-Americans) do not know about, much less understand, the
workings of these courts.

This ignorance is not simply the result of apathy or lack of interest.

The American judicial system is complicated, confusing, and
frequently opaque in its operations and motivations. It is often hard
to understand how courts work and what effects they have, even
when people want to comprehend. Unlike most Western nations, the
United States does not have a single, unified judicial system. Rather,
it has fifty-one separate judicial systems, one for each state and one
for the nation (the federal court system, which itself includes two
categories of courts: one organized under the authority of Article III
of the US Constitution, known as constitutional or Article III courts,
and the other organized solely under the lawmaking power of
Congress, known as legislative or Article I courts). Each of these
fifty-one judicial systems has features unique to it alone, yet each
shares common elements with the others, and all of them are
interrelated in various ways, so that we can speak in the singular of
an American judicial system. Still, the American judicial system made
up of these fifty-one court systems is complex and multifaceted.

This book’s purpose is to introduce this complex mix of local, state,

and federal courts that we call the American judicial system. It
focuses on the structures, functions, workloads, and powers of
American courts; the politics and laws that shape these courts’
judicial functions and their exercise of their powers; and the people
who constitute that system’s backbone. This book’s goal is to explain
in simple terms how this complex and diverse mix of people,
institutions, and rules combines to give the United States a workable
legal system that meets (or, in some cases, does not meet) the
needs of the American people for law, order, justice, and dispute
resolution.

Underlying this discussion will be a simple question: How can the

United States have fifty-one separate legal systems and still be
accurately described as having a single judicial system? After all, the
differences between the various state court systems and between
them and their federal counterparts are notable and extensive. Each
court system ostensibly enforces a different set of substantive laws
and applies its own legal rules and procedures, although federal
courts can and do enforce state laws and vice versa; the specific
court structures (number, distribution, and jurisdictions) vary widely;
the personnel making up the court systems—in particular, the judges
who lead these courts—also vary as to background, method of
selection, and terms of service. Nearly every generalization that we
make about the American judicial system has an exception;
somewhere, some state or federal court does things differently,
separating itself from all the rest.

Yet, despite such diversity, in the end there are enough similarities to
outweigh the differences. Viewed together, the state and federal
judicial systems exhibit several shared themes and functional
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
body; a projection from the thoracic side-pieces, forming a long
pouch, into which a fold on the inner side of the elytra fits, the two
being subsequently locked by the action of some special projections.
This arrangement is similar to that which exists in the anomalous
family of water-beetles Pelobiidae. In order to make this mechanism
more perfect the side-pieces in Belostoma form free processes.
Martin has informed us that the young have the metasternal
episternum prolonged to form a lamella that he thinks may be for
respiratory purposes.[499] About twelve genera and upwards of fifty
species of Belostomidae are known. None exist in our isles, but
several species extend their range to Southern Europe. In the waters
of the warm regions of the continents of both the Old and New
Worlds they are common Insects, but as yet they have not been
found in Australia.

Fam. 24. Notonectidae.—Prosternum short, so that the legs are

placed near the back part of it as well as near the front; back of the
head overlapped by the front of the pronotum.—The water-boatmen
are extremely common in our ponds, where they may be seen rising
to the surface and raising the posterior extremity of the body for
breathing. They swim on their backs instead of in the usual position,
and have an elaborate arrangement of long hairs on the body to
assist them to carry about an air-supply. They are said to be lighter
than the water, and to have some difficulty in keeping away from the
surface. Notonecta glauca is the only British species, but we have a
second minute Insect, Plea minutissima, belonging to the family. It
lies in the mud at the bottom of shallow waters, and may sometimes
be fished up in great numbers. It is considered by some authors to
form a distinct family. The oviposition of Notonecta has been
observed by Regimbart; the eggs are inserted into the stems of
aquatic plants.

Fam. 25. Corixidae.—Prosternum short, as in Notonectidae; summit

of the head free from the thorax.—We have numerous species of the
genus Corixa in Britain; and others extremely similar in appearance
occur in various parts of the world. The head is remarkably free, and
capable of great rotation. On dissection it is found to be attached to
the thorax only by a narrow area; in this respect it differs widely from
Notonecta, which possesses an extremely large occipital foramen,
and the head of which possesses but little freedom of movement.
The extremely short proboscis is more or less retractile, and
therefore frequently appears absent. A second British genus consists
of a single species, Sigara minutissima. These Insects, unlike
Notonecta, are quite at home beneath the water, where they scurry
about with extreme rapidity, and occur sometimes in enormous
numbers. In Mexico the eggs of Corixa americana and of C.
femorata are used as food, and are said to be very nice. The Insects
themselves are used as food in both Mexico and Egypt. The species
of this family can make a noise beneath the water by rubbing the
front feet against the proboscis.[500] The males have a very complex
asymmetry of the terminal segments, and in some species possess
on one side of the dorsal surface a curious asymmetrical organ
consisting of rows of very closely-packed, intensely black, comb-like
plates, called by Buchanan White a strigil. This organ seems to be
similar to the peculiar structures found on the terminal segments of
certain species of Scutellerides.

Sub-Order II. Homoptera.[501]

Fam. 1. Cicadidae.—Head with three ocelli, placed triangularly on

the summit between the compound eyes; antennae consisting of a
short basal joint, surmounted by a hair-like process divided into
about five segments. Front femora more or less thick, armed with
teeth. Peduncle (or basal joints) of antennae without sensitive
organs.—This important family consists chiefly of large Insects, few
being as small as one inch across the expanded wings, while in
some the expanse is as much as seven inches. As a rule the four
wings are transparent and shining, with the nervures remarkably
distinct and dark coloured; but there are numerous forms where the
whole creature, including the wings, is highly pigmented in a showy
manner; frequently in black and yellow. Cicadas are said to be
without any special protection, and to be destroyed in considerable
numbers by birds and other animals. The body is broad and robust,
and is never shaped into the extravagant forms we meet with in
some of the other families of Homoptera.

Fig. 280—Cicada septendecim. North America. (After Riley.) A, Larva;

B, nymph; C, nymph skin after emergence of the imago, D; E,
section of twig with series of eggs; F, two eggs magnified.

Cicadidae are almost confined to the warmer regions of the earth,

but we have one species, a great rarity, in the extreme south of
England; altogether there are about 800 species known. These
Insects are seen above ground—so far as the life-histories are at
present known—only in the perfect condition, the creatures in their
earlier stages being subterranean and living on roots. As soon as the
individual comes out of the ground it splits open the nymph-skin, and
the perfect Cicada emerges. One species—the North American
Cicada septendecim—is a most notorious Insect owing to its life-
cycle of seventeen years. It is considered that the individual, after
nearly seventeen years of underground existence, comes to the
surface and lives for a brief period the life of a noisy Insect. This is
the only Insect at present known having so considerable a longevity.
This fact, and several other peculiarities, have attracted much
attention, so that there is an extensive literature connected with the
seventeen-year Cicada. It has a wide distribution over the United
States, but does not confine its appearance to every seventeenth
year, being found somewhere or other—frequently in numerous
localities—almost every year. The evidence as to its periodicity has
been obtained by taking the locality and other points into
consideration as well as the year of appearance. By so doing it has
been found possible to establish the existence of twenty-two broods
which are distinguished by consecutive numeration. This being done,
the evidence as to the years during which Cicadas have appeared in
any given locality is examined, and the result is believed to bear out
the view that the life-cycle of the individual Insect is really one of
seventeen years. According to this view there are, underground, in
certain localities individuals of different ages that will appear on the
surface as mature individuals in different years. Thus in 1885 it was
understood that there were underground in Alabama two broods, viz.
brood xviii. that would appear on the surface in 1894, and brood iv.
that would appear on the surface in 1896. The predictions made as
to the years in which Cicadas would appear in some given locality
are considered to have proved correct. Moreover, particular
entomologists have in certain localities verified by personal
examination the appearance of the Insects for several consecutive
periods of seventeen years. These facts appear fairly conclusive, but
they are much complicated by another point, viz. that in certain
localities the period is one of thirteen, not of seventeen, years. This
is to some extent a question of climate, the thirteen-year interval
being chiefly characteristic of the Southern States. It is not, however,
entirely so, for there are localities in which the broods have an
interval of either thirteen years or seventeen years. Another fact
should be remembered, viz. that it is admitted that not quite all the
individuals of a particular brood are true to their proper time of
appearance; in other words, a few specimens may appear
precociously a year or two before their comrades, while some may
lag behind to a considerable extent. It is therefore a matter for great
surprise that, under these circumstances, the broods should keep
distinct at all, for one would suppose that time-variation of this kind
would lead to completely obscuring the distinctness of the broods.
We must also call attention to the fact that both the seventeen-year
and the thirteen-year broods have a dimorphic form, or sub-species,
called C. cassinii which accompanies the ordinary form, with which it
is apparently as a rule not connected by intermediates.[502]
Cicadidae are provided with powerful ovipositors. The eggs of C.
septendecim are deposited in the woody stems of bushes; after
remaining there a few weeks the young hatch out, drop to the
ground, and, as previously stated, disappear for nearly seventeen
years, nearly the whole of which time is passed in the larval state,
the nymph-condition existing for only a few days. They feed on the
roots of various trees; it has been said that they are injurious in this
way, but other authorities maintain that they suck only a moist
exudation from the roots. It is very difficult to obtain information as to
their strange, prolonged, subterranean life; it said that the Insects
sometimes penetrate to a great depth—ten feet, even twenty feet are
mentioned;—and as great changes may take place on the surface
during their long lives, these Insect Rip Van Winkles sometimes
emerge in very strange conditions, and may appear even in deep
cellars. When the pupa comes to the surface it hooks itself on to the
stem of some plant or other object, the skin of the back splits, and
the Cicada emerges. Among the inexplicable peculiarities of this
Insect must be mentioned the fact that when emerging it sometimes
constructs chimneys, or flues, extending several inches above the
surface of the ground. The reason for this is much disputed; it was
said that they are for refuge against inundations, but this appears to
be very doubtful. Certain of the broods consist of an almost
incalculable number of individuals, and it is very strange to hear
woods, or other localities, that have been for many years free from
these Insects, all at once resounding with their noisy song. The
seventeen-year Cicada is considered to be doomed to a speedy
extinction; the extension of cultivation and building, and the
introduction to America of the English sparrow, are likely to prove too
much for the Insect.

Although Hemiptera are classified by many among the Ametabola or

Insects without metamorphosis, it is impossible to deny that the
Cicadidae exhibit a considerable amount of metamorphosis, and
they are usually mentioned as exceptional. The young (Fig. 280, A)
is totally unlike the adult in form and colour, and maintains, to a
certain extent, its existence by the aid of a different set of
implements. The larva of the Cicada is colourless, with an
integument of very feeble consistence, rather large antennae, and a
remarkable pair of fossorial legs; the wings are totally wanting. The
mode of passage from the larval to the pupal state has not been
recorded. The pupa, or nymph, differs from the larva by its much
shorter, compressed form; by being encased in a remarkably hard
shell; and by the antennae approximating in form to those of the
adult. It has short wing-pads at the sides of the body; the front legs
are remarkably powerful, and the creature is capable of moving
about; the imago escapes from the pupa by the splitting dorsally of
the middle of the thoracic segments. The empty pupa-skin does not
shrivel, but retains its form, and in countries where Cicadas occur,
frequently attracts attention by the strange form it presents, being
often placed in a conspicuous position.

Song.—Cicadas are the most noisy of the Insect world; the shrilling
of grasshoppers and even of crickets being insignificant in
comparison with the voice of Cicada. Darwin heard them in South
America when the Beagle was anchored a quarter of a mile from the
shore; and Tympanoterpes gigas, from the same region, is said to
make a noise equal to the whistle of a locomotive.[503] A curious
difference of opinion prevails as to whether their song is agreeable
or not; in some countries they are kept in cages, while in others they
are considered a nuisance. The Greeks are said to have decided in
favour of their performances, the Latins against them. Only the
males sing, the females being completely dumb; this has given rise
to a saying by a Greek poet (so often repeated that it bids fair to
become immortal) "Happy the Cicadas' lives, for they all have
voiceless wives."[504] The writer considers the songs of the
European species he has heard far from unpleasant, but he is an
entomologist, and therefore favourably prepossessed; and he admits
that Riley's description of the performances of the seventeen-year
Cicada is far from a satisfactory testimonial to the good taste of that
Insect; Riley says, "The general noise, on approaching the infested
woods, is a combination of that of a distant threshing-machine and a
distant frog-pond. That which they make when disturbed, mimics a
nest of young snakes or young birds under similar circumstances—a
sort of scream. They can also produce a chirp somewhat like that of
a cricket and a very loud, shrill screech prolonged for fifteen or
twenty seconds, and gradually increasing in force and then
decreasing." The object, or use of the noise is very doubtful; it is said
that it attracts the females to the males. "De gustibus non est
disputandum!" perhaps, however, there may be some tender notes
that we fail to perceive; and it may be that the absence of any
definite organs of hearing reduces the result of a steam-engine
whistle to the equivalent of an agreeable whisper. No special
auditory organs have been detected[505] as we have already
intimated; and certain naturalists, amongst whom we may mention
Giard, think that the Insects do not hear in our sense of the word, but
feel rhythmical vibrations; it is also recorded that though very shy the
Insects may be induced to approach any one who will stand still and
clap his hands—in good measure—within the range of their
sensibilities. There is a good deal of support to the idea that the
males sing in rivalry.

Vocal structures.—Although we may not be able to pronounce a

final opinion as to the value to the Insect of the sounds, yet we
cannot withhold our admiration from the structures from which they
proceed. These are indeed so complex that they must be ranked as
amongst the most remarkable voice-organs in the animal kingdom.
They are totally different from the stridulating organs that are found
in many other Insects, and are indeed quite peculiar to the
Cicadidae. Some difference of opinion has existed as to the manner
in which the structures act, but the account given by Carlet, some of
whose figures we reproduce, will, we believe, be found to be
essentially correct. The structures are partly thoracic and partly
abdominal. On examining a male Cicada there will be seen on the
under surface two plates—the opercula—usually meeting in the
middle line of the body and overlapping the base of the abdomen to
a greater or less extent according to the species, sometimes nearly
covering this part of the body; these are enlargements of the
metathoracic epimera; they can be slightly moved away from the
abdomen, and, as the latter part is capable of a still greater extent of
movement, a wide fissure may be produced, displaying the complex
structures. In order to see the parts it is better to cut away an
operculum; underneath it three membranes can be seen, an
external, the timbal; an anterior, the folded or soft membrane; and a
posterior, the mirror. This last is a most beautiful object, tensely
stretched and pellucid, yet reflecting light so as to be of varied
colours; there are also three stigmata, and some chambers
connected with the apparatus. The sound is primarily produced by
the vibrations of the timbal, to which a muscle is attached; the other
membranes are probably also thrown into a condition of vibration,
and the whole skeleton of the Insect helps to increase or modify the
sound, which is probably also influenced by the position of the
opercula. The stigmata probably play an important part by regulating
the tension of the air in the chambers. In the female some of the
structures are present in a rudimentary form, but there are no
muscles, and this sex appears to be really quite voiceless.

Fig. 281.—Musical apparatus of Cicada plebeia. (After Carlet.) A,

Ventral view (Operculum on right side is removed); ap, apophysis;
C, cavern; c, trochantin (cheville of Réaumur); ent, part of internal
skeleton of abdomen; mi, specular membrane; m.pl, soft or folded
membrane; P, base of leg; st, st′, st″, stigmata; t, drum "timbale";
v, operculum; 1a, first, 2a, second abdominal segment: B, same
seen laterally, portion of abdominal wall as well as operculum
removed; A, point of insertion of hind wing; Mes, mesothorax; sc,
scutum of metathorax; 3a, third abdominal segment; rest as in A.

Fam. 2. Fulgoridae.—Ocelli two (rarely three, or entirely obsolete),

placed beneath the eyes or near the eyes, usually in cavities of the
cheeks, antennae placed beneath the eyes, very variable in form;
usually of two joints terminated by a very fine hair, the second joint
with a peculiar texture of the surface, owing to the existence of
sensitive structures (Hansen). Form of head very diverse; vertex and
face forming either a continuous curve, or the planes of the vertex
and face forming an acute angle, or both prolonged so as to form a
projection or growth that may be monstrous. Prothorax neither
armed nor unusually developed.

Fig. 282—Fulgora candelaria. × 1. China.

This family is of large extent, and includes at present so great a

variety of forms that it is really almost impossible to frame a definition
that will apply to all. The unusual situation of the ocelli and the
peculiar second joint of the antennae must at present be taken as
the best diagnostic characters: occasionally a third ocellus is
present. Some of the Fulgoridae are amongst the largest Insects,
others are quite small. The family includes the so-called Lantern-
flies, in which the front of the head forms a huge misshapen
proboscis that was formerly believed to be luminous. Many of the
species are of brilliant or beautiful coloration. A great many—and of
very different kinds—have the curious power of excreting large
quantities of a white, flocculent wax. This is exhibited by our little
British Insects of the genus Cixius, and in some of the exotic forms is
carried to an extent that becomes a biological puzzle. The Tropical
American genus Phenax may be cited as an example; being about
an inch long it flies about with a large mass of this waxy substance
twice as long as itself; indeed, in the Mexican P. auricoma, the waxy
processes are four or five inches long. This wax forms a favourite
food of certain kinds of Lepidoptera, and two or three larvae of a
maggot-like nature may frequently be found concealed in the wax of
the live Fulgorids; this has been recorded by Westwood as occurring
in India; and Champion has observed it in the New World.[506] The
wax of Fulgorids is used by the Chinese for candles and other
purposes; and this white Insect-wax is said to be much esteemed in
India. Very curious chemical substances have been obtained from it,
but its importance in the economy of the Insects that produce it is
quite obscure. We have about seventy species of Fulgoridae in
Britain. They belong to the subfamilies Tettigometrides, Issides,
Cixiides, and Delphacides, which by many authors are treated as
separate families. The exotic subfamily Flatides is highly peculiar. In
some of its members the head is very different from that of the
ordinary forms, being narrow, and the vertex and front forming a
continuous curve. Some of these Insects are remarkably like
butterflies or moths (e.g. the African Ityraea nigrocincta and the
species of the genus Pochazia), but the young are totally unlike the
old, the posterior part of the body bearing a large bush of curled,
waxy projections, several times the size of the rest of the body.

Fig. 283—A, B, Heteronotus trinodosus. A, Male seen from above; B,

profile of female; a, terminal part of pronotum; b, terminal part of
abdomen: C, front view of head and pronotum of Cyphonia
clavata. Both species from Central America. (From Biol. Centr.
Amer. Rhynch. Homopt. II.)

Fam. 3. Membracidae.—Prothorax prolonged backwards into a

hood or processes of diverse forms; antennae inserted in front of the
eyes; ocelli two, placed between the two eyes.—This family is of
large extent but its members are chiefly tropical, and are specially
abundant in America. Although not of large size the Membracidae
are unsurpassed for the variety and grotesqueness of their shapes,
due to the unusual development of the pronotum. We figure two of
these forms (Fig. 283).[507] Very little is known about their habits and
life-histories. We have only two species of the family in Britain, and
these do not afford any ground for supposing that there are any
peculiarities in their lives at all commensurate with the oddness of
the Insect's structures. Belt has recorded the fact that in Nicaragua
the larvae of certain Homoptera were assiduously attended by ants
for the sake of a sweet juice excreted by the bugs, but it is by no
means clear that these larvae were really those of Membracidae. In
North America Ceresa bubalus and C. taurina place their eggs in an
extremely neat manner in the woody twigs of trees. The young have
but little resemblance to the adults, the great thoracic hood being
absent, while on the back there is on each segment a pair of long,
sub-erect processes having fringed, or minutely spiny, margins.[508]

Fam. 4. Cercopidae.—Ocelli two (occasionally absent) placed on

the vertex; antennae placed between the eyes. Thorax not peculiarly
formed.—In the characteristic forms of this family the front of the
vertex bears a suture, touched on each side by one at right angles to
it, or converging to it so as to form a triangle or a sort of embrasure;
the hind tibiae have only one to three strong spines. The Cercopidae
are much less extraordinary than many of the previously considered
families. But some of them have the habit of secreting a large
quantity of fluid; and when in the immature stages, certain of them
have the art of emitting the liquid in the form of bubbles which
accumulate round the Insect and conceal it. These accumulations of
fluid are called cuckoo-spits or frog-spits; and the perfect Insects are
known as frog-hoppers, their power of leaping being very great. The
most abundant of the frog-hoppers in our gardens is Philaenus
spumarius, a little Insect of about a quarter of an inch long, obscurely
coloured, with more or less definite pale spots; it is so variable in
colour that it has received scores of names. Some of the Insects do
not use their fluid in this manner, but eject it in the form of drops, and
sometimes cast them to a considerable distance. The phenomena
known as weeping-trees are due to Cercopidae; some of the species
make such copious exudations of this kind that the drops have been
compared to a shower of rain. In Madagascar it is said that Ptyelus
goudoti exudes so much fluid that five or six dozen larvae would
about fill a quart vessel in an hour and a half. The frog-spit is
considered by some naturalists to be a protective device; the larvae
are, however, a favourite food with certain Hymenoptera, which pick
out the larvae from the spits and carry them off to be used as stores
of provision for their larvae. In Ceylon the larva of Machaerota
guttigera constructs tubes fixed to the twigs of the tulip-tree, and
from the tube water is exuded drop by drop. According to Westwood,
this Insect is intermediate between Cercopidae and Membracidae.
[509]

Fam. 5. Jassidae.—Ocelli two, placed just on the front margin of the

head (almost in a line with the front of the eyes or more to the front)
or on the deflexed frons. Hind tibiae usually with many spines. This
vaguely limited family includes a very large number of small or
minute Insects, usually of narrow, parallel form, and frequently
excessively delicate and fragile. They are often mentioned under the
name of Cicadellinae. Ashmead distinguishes two families,
Bythoscopidae, in which the ocelli are clearly on the frons or front,
and Jassidae, in which they are on the upper edge thereof. Ulopa,
Ledra, and a few other exceptional forms, are also by many
distinguished as representatives of distinct families. Very little is
actually known as to the life-histories of these small and fragile
Insects, but it is believed that the eggs are usually deposited in the
leaves or stems of plants, and more particularly of grasses. In North
America the development of Deltocephalus inimicus, from hatching
to assumption of the adult form, has been observed by Webster to
occupy about six weeks. As Jassidae are numerous both in species
and individuals it is believed that they consume a considerable part
of the vegetation of pastures. Osborn has calculated that on an acre
of pasture there exist, as a rule, about one million of these hoppers,
and he considers they obtain quite as large a share of the food as
the Vertebrates feeding with them.

Fam. 6. Psyllidae.—Minute Insects with wings usually transparent,

placed in a roof-like manner over the body; with three ocelli, and
rather long, thin antennae of eight to ten joints. Tarsi two-jointed.—
These small Insects have been studied chiefly in Europe and North
America, very little information having yet been obtained as to the
exotic forms. They are about the size of Aphidae, but in form and
general appearance remind one rather of Cicadidae. The wings are
in many cases even more perfectly transparent than they are in
many Cicadidae. They are sometimes called springing plant-lice, as
their habit of jumping distinguishes them from the Aphidae. Löw has
called attention to the remarkable variation in colour they present in
conformity with either the age of the individual, the food-plant, the
climate, and, more particularly, the season of the year.[510] Réaumur
long since pointed out that at their ecdyses these Insects go through
a remarkable series of changes of colour, and Löw found that this did
not take place in the normal manner in the winter generation that
hibernates. This has been confirmed by Slingerland in North America
in the case of Psylla pyricola,[511] which has been introduced there.
He finds that there are several generations in the year, and that the
hibernating adults differ from the summer adults in size, being nearly
one-third larger; in their much darker colouring; and especially in the
coloration of the front wings.

Fig. 284—Psylla succincta. x 15. Europe. (After Heeger.) A, larva

before first moult. B, larva after third moult. C, adult.

In the earlier stages, Psyllidae differ greatly in appearance from the

adult forms; the legs and antennae in the newly hatched larvae are
short, and have a less number of joints. In the nymph the shape is
very peculiar, the large wing-pads standing out horizontally from the
sides of the body, so that the width of the creature is about as great
as the length. The period occupied by the development apparently
varies according to season. Witlaczil, who has given an account of
many details of the anatomy and histology of various Psyllidae,[512]
considers that there are four larval stages; Heeger's account of
Psylla succincta is not quite clear on this point, and Slingerland
indicates a stage more than this, the perfect Insect being disclosed
as the result of a fifth moult; it is probable that he is correct. In these
earlier stages the body bears long hairs called wax-hairs; according
to Witlaczil in the young larvae of certain species—Trioza rhamni,
e.g.—these are broad and flat, so as to make the body appear
studded with oval processes; he states that these hairs change their
form during the growth of the individual. Nothing is more remarkable
in Psyllidae than the amount of matter they secrete or exude from
their bodies; in some species the substance is a "honey-dew," and
the nymph may keep itself covered with a drop of it: in other cases it
is solid, as shown in Réaumur's figures of P. buxi, where this
exudation forms a string several times longer than the body, and
attached to it. Another form of exudation is a light downy or waxy
matter. Slingerland says that honey-dew was exuded by P. pyricola
in such quantities that it "literally rained from the trees upon the
vegetation beneath; in cultivating the orchard the back of the horse
and the harness often became covered with the sticky substance
dropping from the trees. It attracts thousands of ants, bees, and
wasps, which feed upon it." The writer last year observed in the New
Forest a stunted sloe-bush, about which a large number of Bombi
were busily occupied; and examination showed that they were
thrusting their proboscides into the curled and deformed leaves, in
which were secreted nymphs of a Psylla exuding honey-dew. It must
not be assumed that this honey-dew is the excrement of the Insect;
this also is known, and is a different substance. Those who have
tasted it say that the honey-dew has a clean, good flavour. The
source of the honey-dew is not quite certain, but it seems probable
that it comes, like the solid matter figured by Réaumur, directly from
the alimentary canal, and not from hairs or pores on the body.
Psyllidae give rise to definite formations or galls on certain plants;
sometimes these Psyllid galls are mere changes in form of a limited
part, or parts, of a leaf, giving rise either to crumpling or to growth of
a portion in one direction only, so that on one surface of the leaf a
swelling is formed, and on the opposite side a more or less deep
cavity in which the Insect dwells. A formation of this kind on the
leaves of Aegopodium podagraria is described by Thomas[513] who
states that the growth is due to the deposition of an egg of the
Psylla, and is independent of the after life of the Insect; a fungus—
Puccinia aegopodii—forms similar structures on the leaves.
Structures much more definite than this may be the result of the
attacks of Psyllidae; for an example the reader may refer to
Réaumur's account of Psylla buxi.[514] In Australia and Tasmania
there are Psyllidae known as Laap or Lerp Insects, the products of
which are called leaf-manna or Lerp, and are used as food. This
manna is a scale produced by the young Insect on the leaves of
Eucalyptus as a covering or protection. The scale is fastened to the
leaf by a hinge, and is somewhat like the shell of a cockle. Although
the scales are said to be in some cases objects of great beauty, very
little is known about these Australian Psyllidae, one of which has,
however, been referred by Schwarz to the genus Spondyliaspis,
Signoret.[515] About 160 species of Psyllidae are known to occur in
the Palaearctic region, and about fifty of them have been found in
Britain.[516]

Fam. 7. Aphidae (Plant-lice or Green-fly.)—Minute Insects; as

usually met with destitute of wings, though many individuals have
two pairs of transparent wings. Antennae long, or moderately long,
three- to seven-jointed; abdomen frequently with a pair of tubes
(siphons), or short processes on the upper side of the fifth abdominal
segment. Tarsi two-jointed, first joint sometimes excessively short.—
These soft-skinned Insects are frequently called blight, and are so
abundant in temperate climates that a garden, however small, is
sure to afford abundance of specimens during the warm months of
the year. This great abundance is due to peculiarities in the
physiological processes that render these obscure little animals
highly important creatures; the individual life for several generations
is restricted to constant, or at any rate copious, imbibition of food,
accompanied by an almost uninterrupted production of young by
parthenogenetic females, the young so produced becoming rapidly
(sometimes in the course of eight or ten days, but more usually in
about twenty days) themselves devoted to a similar process; so that
in the comparatively short period of a few months the progeny
resulting from a single individual is almost innumerable. This
remarkable state of affairs is accompanied by other peculiarities of
physiology, with the result that the life-histories of successive
generations become very diverse, and complex cycles of series of
generations differing more or less from one another are passed
through, the species finally returning to bi-sexual reproduction, and
thus inaugurating another cycle of generations. The surprising nature
of these facts has in the last 150 years caused an immense amount
of discussion, but no satisfactory light has yet been thrown on the
conditions that really give rise to the exceptional phenomena. These
phenomena are (1) parthenogenesis; (2) oviparous and viviparous
reproduction; (3) the production of generations of individuals in which
the sexes are very unequally represented, males being frequently
entirely absent; (4) the production of individuals differing as to the
acquirement of wings, some remaining entirely apterous, while
others go on to the winged form; (5) the production of individuals of
the same sex with different sexual organs, and distinctions in the
very early (but not the earliest) stages of the formation of the
individual; (6) differences in the life-habits of successive generations;
(7) differences in the habits of individuals of one generation, giving
rise to the phenomenon of parallel series. All these phenomena may
occur in the case of a single species, though in a very variable
extent.

The simple form of Aphid life may be described as follows:—eggs

are laid in the autumn, and hatch in the spring, giving rise to females
of an imperfect character having no wings; these produce living
young parthenogenetically, and this process may be repeated for a
few or for many generations, and there may be in these generations
a greater or less number of winged individuals, and perhaps a few
males.[517] After a time when temperature falls, or when the supply
of food is less in quantity, or after a period of deliberate abstention
from food, sexual individuals are produced and fertilised eggs are
laid which hatch in the spring, and the phenomena are repeated. In
other cases these phenomena are added to or rendered more
complicated by the intercalated parthenogenetic generations
exhibiting well-marked metamorphosis, of kinds such as occur in
apterous or in winged Insects; while again the habits of successive
generations may differ greatly, the individuals of some generations
dwelling in galls, while those of other generations live underground
on roots.

Parthenogenesis.—Returning to the various kinds of peculiarities

we have enumerated on the preceding page, we may remark that
the phenomena of parthenogenesis have been thoroughly
established as occurring in Aphidae since Bonnet discovered the fact
150 years ago; and though they have not been investigated in much
detail it is known that the parthenogenesis is usually accompanied
by the production of young all of the female sex. In other cases
males are parthenogenetically produced; but whether these males
come from a female that produces only that sex is not yet, so far as
the writer knows, established. A note by Lichtenstein[518] suggests
that usually only one sex is produced by a parthenogenetic female,
but that both sexes are sometimes so produced. There is not at
present any species of Aphid known to be perpetuated by an
uninterrupted series of parthenogenetic generations. It was formerly
supposed that there are no males at all in Chermes, but, as we shall
subsequently show, this was erroneous. It has, however, been
observed that a series of such generations may be continued without
interruption for a period of four years, and we have no reason to
suppose that even this could not be much exceeded under
favourable conditions. The parthenogenetic young may be produced
either viviparously or oviparously, according to species.

Oviparous and viviparous reproduction.—The distinction between

these two processes has been extensively discussed, some
naturalists maintaining that they are thoroughly distinct ab initio. This
view, however, cannot be sustained. The best authorities are agreed
that in the earliest processes of individualisation the ovum, and the
pseudovum[519] giving rise to a viviparous individual, are
indistinguishable. Leydig, Huxley, Balbiani, and Lemoine are agreed
as to this. Nevertheless, differences in the development occur
extremely early. The nature of these differences may be briefly
described by saying that in the viviparous forms the embryonic
development sets in before the formation of the egg is properly
completed. Balbiani says, "In fact at this moment [when the
viviparous development is commencing] the germ [pseudovum] is far
from having obtained the development it is capable of, and from
having accumulated all the matter necessary for the increase of the
embryo, so that the evolution of the former coincides, so to speak,
with that of the latter. On the other hand, in the true ovum the two
processes are chronologically separate, for the rudiment of the new
individual never appears before the egg has completed the growth of
its constituent parts."[520] As regards the difference in structure of
the organs of viviparously and oviparously producing individuals, it is
sufficient to remark that they are not of great importance, being
apparently confined to certain parts remaining rudimentary in the
former. Leydig, indeed, found an Aphis in which certain of the egg-
tubes contained eggs in various stages of development, and others
embryos in all stages.[521]

As regards the physiology of production of winged and wingless

individuals there has been but little exact inquiry. Vast numbers of
individuals may be produced without any winged forms occurring,
while on the other hand these latter are occasionally so abundant as
to float about in swarms that darken the air; the two forms are
probably, however, determined by the supply of food. The winged
forms are less prolific than the apterous forms; and Forbes has
noticed in Aphis maidi-radicis, where the generations consist partly
of apterous and partly of winged individuals, that when the corn
begins to flag in consequence of the attacks of the Aphis, then the
proportion of winged individuals becomes large.[522] The
appearance of winged individuals is frequently accompanied by a
peculiar change of habit; the winged individuals migrating to another
plant, which in many cases is of a totally different botanical nature
from that on which the apterous broods were reared: for instance
Aphis mali, after producing several apterous generations on apple,
gives rise to winged individuals that migrate to the stems of corn or
grass, and feeding thereon commence another cycle of generations.
The study of this sort of Aphis-migration is chiefly modern, but many
very curious facts have already been brought to light; thus
Drepanosiphum platanoides, after producing a certain number of
viviparous generations on maple (Acer), quits this food-plant for
another, but after two or three months returns again to the maple,
and produces sexual young that lay eggs.[523] Histories such as this
are rather common. Even more interesting are the cases of those
species that, after some weeks of physiological activity on a plant,
pass into a state of repose on the same plant, and then after some
weeks produce sexual young. On the whole, it would appear that the
appearance of winged forms is a concomitant of decreasing nutrition.
It is a very remarkable fact that the sexually perfect females are
invariably apterous, and this is frequently also the case with the
males. It is also highly remarkable that the sexually perfect
individuals are of comparatively small size. There are at least three
kinds of males in Aphidae—1, winged males; 2, wingless males with
mouth well developed; 3, wingless small males with mouth absent.
As regards some of these points the conditions usual in Insect life
are reversed.[524] Huxley inclined to treat all these products of a
fertilised egg, that are antecedent to another process of
gamogenesis (i.e. production with fertilisation), as one zoological
individual: in that case the Aphis zoological individual is winged
before attaining the mature state, and is wingless and smaller when
mature. Some species may have as a rule two, others three, winged
generations in a year.

Fig. 285—Chermes abietis; hibernating female or "winter-mother."

Europe. Much magnified. (After Cholodkovsky.)
Parallel series.—In certain cases individuals of one generation
assume different habits, and so set up the phenomenon known as
parallel series. This has been recently investigated in the genus
Chermes by Blochmann, Dreyfus, and Cholodkovsky. This latter
savant informs us[525] that a wingless parthenogenetic female of
Chermes hibernates on a fir-tree—Picea excelsa—and in the spring
lays numerous eggs; these hatch, and by the effects of suction of the
Chermes on the young shoots, galls are formed (Fig. 286), in which
the Insects are found in large numbers; when they have grown the
galls open, and allowing the Insects to escape these moult and
become winged females. They now take on different habits; some of
them remain on the Picea, lay their eggs thereon, and out of these
there are produced young that grow into hibernating females, which
next spring produce galls as their grandmothers did; but another
portion migrates to the Larch (Larix); here eggs are laid, from which
proceed wingless parthenogenetic females, that hibernate on their
new or secondary plant, and in the following spring lay their eggs
and give rise to a dimorphic generation, part of them becoming
nymphs and going on to the winged condition, while the other part
remain wingless and lay eggs, that give rise to yet another wingless
generation; in fact, a second pair of parallel series is formed on the
new plant, of which one is wingless, and exclusively
parthenogenetic, and continues to live in this fashion for an indefinite
period on the secondary plant, while the other part becomes winged;
these latter are called sexuparous, and go back to the Picea, and
there lay eggs, that give rise to the sexual forms. If we would
summarise these facts with a view to remembering them, we may
say that a migration of a part of a generation from the Picea was
made with a view of producing a sexual generation, but that only a
portion of the migrants succeeded in effecting the object of the
migration, and this only in their third generation. Thus portions
remained on the Picea, producing unisexual (female) individuals,
and a portion of those that emigrated to the Larix remained thereon,
producing also unisexual (female) individuals, while the others
returned to the Picea and produced a sexual generation. How long
the production of the unisexual generations may continue has not
been determined.