Professional Documents
Culture Documents
파면사진
파면사진
파면사진
art ic l e i nf o a b s t r a c t
Article history: This investigation illustrates ratcheting phenomenon, in-situ substructural variations during ratcheting
Received 24 December 2012 and post-ratcheting tensile properties of interstitial free steel at ambient temperature (≈300 K). The
Received in revised form results highlight that the nature of strain accumulation is dependent on the magnitude of the employed
22 February 2013
combinations of mean stress (sm) and stress amplitude (sa); this phenomenon has been explained
Accepted 25 February 2013
considering the asymmetry of loading cycles and substructural variations as delineated by TEM. Tensile
Available online 6 March 2013
strength increases while ductility decreases for ratcheted samples with increasing sm and/or sa and these
Keywords: variations in tensile properties are correlated with the induced cyclic hardening.
Ratcheting & 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Interstitial free steel
Substructure
Tensile strength
0921-5093/$ - see front matter & 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.02.052
128 K. Dutta, K.K. Ray / Materials Science & Engineering A 575 (2013) 127–135
annealing by soaking these at 673 K for 1 h followed by furnace study, thin slices of about 0.5 mm thickness were cut from the
cooling. Specimens with approximate height of 10 mm with cross gauge portions of the ratcheted specimens using a slow speed
section of 12 mm 12 mm were cut from the annealed materials precision cutter (Buehler, Lake Bluff, Illinois, USA). The slices were
for microstructural characterizations and determination of hard- next thinned sequentially by manual polishing on emery paper
ness. Microstructural examinations were carried out with the help followed by dimpling and ion milling prior to TEM studies. TEM
of an optical microscope (Leica, model: DMILP, Bannockburn, IL studies were carried out using a 200 keV transmission electron
60015, USA) connected to an image analyzer (Software: Biovis microscope (JEOL, model: JEM 2100, Tokyo, Japan).
Material Plus, Version: 1.50, Expert Vision Labs Private Limited,
Mumbai, India). Hardness measurements were done with the help
of a Vickers hardness tester (Leco, model: LV 700, Michigan, USA) 3. Results and discussion
using an indentation load of 10 kgf. Tensile tests were carried out
on cylindrical specimens of 5 mm diameter and 25 mm gauge 3.1. Microstructure, hardness and tensile properties of the material
length at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min. The employed cross-
head speed corresponds to nominal strain rate of 3.3 10−3 s−1 at The microstructure of the investigated IF steel is depicted in
the room temperature of ≈300 K. Fig. 2. It exhibits equiaxed ferrite grains; the grain size is estimated
as 64.4 7 1.3 μm. The selected steel contains inclusions of low
volume fraction of the order of 0.06 70.02%. Vickers hardness
2.2. Procedure of uniaxial ratcheting test (HV10) of the steel is found to be 71 71.8. The estimated standard
deviation in hardness is o3%, which supports the contention that
The specimens for ratcheting tests were of configuration the steel is relatively clean and is single phase in nature, as
similar to cylindrical tensile blanks with 6 mm diameter and discussed by Ray and Mondal [25]. Typical engineering stress–
12.5 mm gauge length. Uniaxial ratcheting experiments were strain plot for the investigated steel is illustrated in Fig. 3, which
carried out at room temperature using a servo-hydraulic universal exhibits continuous yielding behaviour; the yield strength value
testing machine (Instron, model: 8800R, High Wycombe, Buck- thus has been determined using 0.2% strain offset procedure as
inghamshire, UK). Cyclic loading was carried out using a triangular suggested in ASTM standard E-8M [26]. The average tensile
waveform in stress-control mode, as schematically shown in Fig. 1. properties of the steel can be summarized as – yield strength:
The loading rate for all ratcheting tests was 50 MPa/s. Based on the 90.77 2.5 MPa, tensile strength: 2407 2 MPa, %uniform elonga-
employed test controls, these tests could be classified into two tion: 36.4 70.8, %total elongation: 51.470.5 and strain hardening
categories as: (i) constant sa with varying sm, and (ii) constant sm exponent (n): 0.407 0.01. The obtained values of the tensile
with varying sa. The different combinations of the employed sa parameters are in good agreement with some reported results
and sm values for these tests are listed in Table 1. The strain on IF steels of similar chemical compositions [27,28].
measurements during cyclic deformation were made using an
axial extensometer having 12.5 mm gauge length. The data per-
3.2. Uniaxial ratcheting: shifting of hysteresis loops
taining to stress-extension as well as actuator displacement were
continuously recorded during each test; attempts were made to
Accumulation of ratcheting strain is known to occur during
acquire at least 200 data points per cycle for further analyses.
asymmetric cyclic loading with non-zero mean stress [23,29–31].
After completion of 100 loading cycles of ratcheting deforma-
Based on the imposed level of mean stress, the nature of stress-
tion, a set of specimens were subjected to tensile tests under
strain hysteresis loops vary. Typical cyclic stress-strain hysteresis
identical manner as described in the previous section. Fracto-
loops generated from ratcheting experiments on the investigated
graphic studies of the broken samples were carried out by using
IF steel samples under positive mean stress levels of 10, 20 and
scanning electron microscope (Zeiss, model: Evo 60, Germany).
30 MPa, with constant stress amplitude of 140 MPa are presented
in Fig. 4(a–c). All these experiments were carried out till 100
2.3. Transmission electron microscopy cycles. The results indicate that the hysteresis loops shift more
towards positive plastic strain for increasing mean stress. For the
To understand the substructural variations associated with mean stress levels of 10 MPa, 20 MPa and 30 MPa, the magnitudes
ratcheting deformation, transmission electron microscopic (TEM)
studies were carried out on a set of ratcheted specimens. For this
Stress
σa
σm
Time
Table 1
Selected sm and sa values for ratcheting tests of IF steel.
250
200
Engineering stress, MPa
150
100
50
0
0 10 20 30 40 50
Engineering strain, %
Fig. 3. Engineering stress–strain plot of the selected steel.
6
6
4
4
6 6
4 4
Fig. 5. Variation of ratcheting strain with number of cycles for varying levels of mean stresses and at constant stress amplitude values: (a) 130 MPa, (b) 140 MPa, (c) 150 MPa
and (d) total accumulation of ratcheting strain up to 100 cycles of loading.
Fig. 7. Typical variation in dislocation density for the cyclic loading conditions of sm ¼ 30 MPa with (a) sa ¼ 140 MPa and (b) sa ¼ 150 MPa.
5
σ 150
m = 10MPa, σa = 150 MPa 6
4 140
130
5 150 140
3
4 130
2 140
3
1
2
0 1 130
-1 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 10 20 30
Number of cycles Mean stress, MPa
Fig. 8. (a) Variation of ratcheting strain with number of cycles for varying stress amplitudes and at a constant mean stress value of 10 MPa and (b) bar chart showing total
accumulation of ratcheting strain up to 100 cycles of loading (values with the bars correspond to stress amplitudes in MPa).
PSB
Discrete PSB
dislocation tangles Wavy slip line
PSB
Planar slips
Subcell
Subcell
Subcell
Fig. 10. Typical variation in dislocation substructure showing (a) planar slips, (b) persistent slip band (PSB), (c) and (d) dislocation cells.
Fig. 10(d) is that for a specimen tested with sm ¼30 MPa and extents of cyclic loading during ratcheting deformation. After 300
sa ¼150 MPa. In general, these figures exhibit planar slips with cycles of ratcheting deformation, dislocation veins form in asso-
discrete tangles of dislocations (Fig. 10a), persistent slip bands ciation with some incipient sub-grains inside some dislocation
(Fig. 10b) as well as dislocation subcells (Fig. 10c and d). An cells; but with increase in ratcheting deformation (after 1200
overview of all these figures indicate that persistent slip bands cycles), number of sub-grains increased. In comparison to their
and planar slips are predominant in specimens subjected to work, IF steel is found to exhibit formation of dislocation cells only
ratcheting at low stress amplitude, whereas formation of disloca- after 100 cycles, with no sub-grain formation inside the cells.
tion cells appears to be the characteristics of specimens subjected The differences may be attributed to the differences in material
to high stress amplitude. Mao et al. [38] have reported that IF steel characteristics as well as the effect of constraint due to presence of
shows formation of dislocation cells when it is subjected to low multiple phases in low carbon steel as compared to that in the
cycle fatigue under various strain amplitudes. These authors have single phase IF steel.
extended evidences of distinct substructure formation in IF steel In generalization, it may be inferred that features associated
loaded for 1000 to 10,000 cycles. It is interesting to note from the with substructure evolution in IF steels incorporate formation of
current TEM results that dislocation cells tend to form even within dislocation tangles and their subsequent conversion to sub-cells
the investigated 100 cycles during ratcheting deformation. Gaudin in ratcheting deformation at higher imposed stress amplitudes
and Feaugas [29] have provided evidences for subcell formation whereas at lower stress levels substructures depict only persistent
during ratcheting of 316L stainless steel. Kang et al. [39] have slip bands with planar slips.
examined evolution of dislocation features in 316L stainless steel
and have reported different stages of dislocation substructure 3.6. Post-ratcheting tensile behaviour
formation. Dislocation pattern changes from dislocation tangles
to incomplete dislocation cells to stable dislocation cells. Cell It is established in the preceding sections that uniaxial ratchet-
formation was also reported for 304LN stainless steel in an earlier ing deformation induces considerable amount of plastic damage in
report by the present authors [30], but those were diffused materials. Naturally it is necessary to understand the associated
dislocation subcells. In contrast, distinct dislocation subcells are effect of this plastic damage on the resultant tensile properties of
observed in the substructure of the investigated IF steel as a result ratcheted specimens. In order to fulfil this motivation, tensile tests
of ratcheting deformation. It is well-known that materials having were carried out on a series of specimens after 100 cycles of
bcc crystal structures produce wavy slip lines upon deformation. asymmetric fatigue cycling, subjected to both “constant stress
Similar features were recorded in this investigation too as depicted amplitude varying mean stress” and “constant mean stress varying
in Fig. 10(b). In addition, Kang et al. [37] have reported evolution stress amplitude” conditions; the estimated tensile strength values
of dislocation substructure in a bcc low carbon steel at various are summarized in Fig. 11. The results in Fig. 11 indicate that the
K. Dutta, K.K. Ray / Materials Science & Engineering A 575 (2013) 127–135 133
280 280
240 240
Strength, MPa
Strength, MPa
200 200
160 160
YS
YS
UTS
120 120 UTS
Stress amplitude: 140 MPa Mean stress: 30 MPa
80 80
Un-ratcheted 10 20 30 Un-ratcheted 130 140 150
Mean stress, MPa Stress amplitude, MPa
Fig. 11. Comparison of yield strength and tensile strength values of unratcheted and ratcheted specimens for the investigated IF steel: (a) at constant stress amplitude and
varying mean stresses and (b) at constant mean stress and varying stress amplitudes.
60 60
50 50
%Elongation
%Elongation
40
40 % uniformation elongation
% total elongation
% uniformation elongation
% total elongation 30 Mean stress: 30 MPa
30
Stress amplitude: 140 MPa
20
20
Un-ratcheted 10 20 30 Un-ratcheted 130 140 150
in this investigation. Based on the results obtained from the current set
of experiments, the following conclusions can be drawn:
References
[14] Y. Jiang, H. Sehitoglu, Int. J. Plast. 10 (5) (1994) 579–608. [29] C. Gaudin, X. Feaugas, Acta Mater. 52 (2004) 3097–3110.
[15] P. Delobelle, P. Robinet, L. Bocher, Int. J. Plast. 11 (4) (1995) 295–330. [30] K. Dutta, S. Sivaprasad, S. Tarafder, K.K. Ray, Mater. Sci. Eng.: A 527 (2010)
[16] Y. Jiang, P. Kurath, Int. J. Plast. 12 (1996) 387–415. 7571–7579.
[17] N. Ohno, M.A. Karim, M. Kobayashi, T. Igari, Int. J. Plast. 14 (1998) 355–372. [31] S.K. Paul, S. Sivaprasad, S. Dhar, S. Tarafder, Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping 87
[18] S. Bari, T. Hassan, Int. J. Plast. 16 (2000) 381–409. (2010) 440–446.
[19] X. Chen, R. Jiao, Int. J. Plast. 20 (4–5) (2004) 871–898. [32] C. Gupta, J.K. Chakravartty, G.R. Reddy, S. Banerjee, Int. J. Pressure Vessels
[20] X. Chen, R. Jiao, K.S. Kim, Int. J. Plast. 21 (1) (2005) 161–184. Piping 82 (2005) 459–469.
[21] J.L. Chaboche, Int. J. Plast. 24 (2008) 1642–1693. [33] C.B. Lim, K.S. Kim, J.B. Seong, Int. J. Fatigue 31 (2009) 501–507.
[22] T. Hassan, S. Kyriakides, Int. J. Plast. 10 (2) (1994) 185–212. [34] G. Kang, Q. Kan, L. Qian, Y. Liu, Mech. Mater. 41 (2009) 139–153.
[23] G.Z. Kang, Q.H. Kan, J. Zhang, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 21 (1) (2005) 5–9. [35] X. Yang, Int. J. Fatigue 27 (2005) 1124–1132.
[24] X. Chen, S. Hui, Polym. Testing 24 (2005) 829–833. [36] G.Z. Kang, Y.J. Liu, Mater. Sci. Eng.: A 472 (1–2) (2008) 258–268.
[25] K.K. Ray, D.P. Mondal, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 23 (1992) 3309–3315. [37] G.Z. Kang, Y.W. Dong, Y.J. Liu, H. Wang, X.J. Cheng, Mater. Sci. Eng.: A 528
[26] E 8M-03, Standard test method for tension testing of metallic materials (2011) 5610–5620.
(Metric), ASTM Annual Book of Standards, 03.01, West Conshohocken, PA, [38] S.W. Mao, W.C. Lo, H.L. Huang, N.J. Ho, J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 19 (2) (2011)
2003. 115–119.
[27] K. Sekido, T. Ohmura, L. Zhang, T. Hara, K. Tsuzaki, Mater. Sci. Eng.: A 530 [39] G. Kang, Y. Dong, H. Wang, Y. Liu, X. Cheng, Mater. Sci. Eng.: A 527 (2010)
(2011) 396–401. 5952–5961.
[28] P.W. Liu, J.K. Wu, Mater. Lett. 57 (2003) 1224–1228.