FINAL_OPCRF-for-School-Heads-SY-2022-2023-Arado

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
NAME OF EMPLOYEE: RUDY GERALD M. BADILLO NAME OF RATER: CHERYLL V. BERMUDO

POSITION: T-III/TIC POSITION: ASST. SCHOOLS DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT
SCHOOL: BADLING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DATE OF REVIEW: AUGUST 9, 2023
RATING PERIOD: SY 2022-2023
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
RESULTS
WEIGHT
ACTUAL
SCORE
SCORE
SCORE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING RATING
FINAL
TIME
LINE
QET
MFO KRAs Objectives
QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINESS Q E T AVE Q E T AVE
LEADING 1.1. Communicated the August 6.50%
Consistently communicated the DepEd vision, mission and core
STRATEGICALLY DepEd vision, mission 2022- July Outstanding values to the wider school community to ensure shared
and core values to the 2023 (5) understanding and alignment of school policies, programs, projects
wider school community
and activities
to ensure shared Frequently communicated the DepEd vision, mission and core
understanding and Very values to the wider school community to ensure shared
alignment of school Satisfactory understanding and alignment of school policies, programs, projects
policies, programs, (4) and activities
Quality
projects and activities Occasionally communicated the DepEd vision, mission and core
Satisfactory values to the wider school community to ensure shared 5 5
(3) understanding and alignment of school policies, programs, projects
and activities
Unsatis factory Rarely communicated the DepEd vision, mission and core values to
(2) the wider school community to ensure shared understanding and
alignment of school policies, programs, projects and activities
Poor Failed to communicate the DepEd vision, mission and core values
(1) to the wider school community to ensure shared understanding and
alignment of school policies, programs, projects and activities
Communicated the DepEd vision, mission and core values to the
wider school community using any five (5) of the following
modalities such as: 5.00 0.325 5.00 0.325 0.325
1. Flyers
2. Tarpaulin
Basic Education Services
3. Video Clip
Outstanding 4. Face-to-face
(5) 5. Newspaper/School Paper
6. Online
7. SRC
Efficiency
8. Radio
9. Video
10.Letter of invitation to stakeholders 5 5
Very Communicated the DepEd vision, mission and core values to the
Satisfactory wider school community using any four (4) of the identified
(4) modalities.
Satisfactory Communicated the DepEd vision, mission and core values to the
(3) wider school community using any three (3) of the identified
modalities
Unsatis factory Communicated the DepEd vision, mission and core values to the
(2) wider school community using any one or two (1 or 2) of the
identified modalities
Poor No acceptable evidence presented
(1)
1.2. Developed and August 6.50% Development plan was enhanced and fully implemented with the
Outstanding
implemented with the 2022- July community performing the leadership roles, and the school provided
(5)
planning team school 2023 technical support
plans aligned with Very Development plan was evolved and fully implemented through the
institutional goals and Satisfactory shared leadership of the school and the community stakeholders
policies (4)
Quality
Development plan guided by the school's VMG was developed
Satisfactory through the leadership of the school and participation of some 5 5
(3) invited community stakeholders
Unsatis factory Development plan was developed and implemented through the
(2) leadership of the school

(1)
Outstanding 100% of school PPAs per approved AIP were
(5) implemented/completed
Very 91-99% of school PPAs per approved AIP were
Satisfactory implemented/completed
Efficiency
(4) 5.00 0.325 5.00 0.325 0.325
Satisfactory 81-90% of school PPAs per approved AIP were
implemented/complemeted 5 5
(3)
Unsatis factory 71-80% of school PPAs were implemented/completed
(2)
Poor 70% and below of school PPAs per approved AIP were
Outstanding Conducted 4 quarterly meetings with the School Planning Team

(5) (SPT) and Project Management Team (PMT)
Very Conducted 3 quarterly meetings with the School Planning Team
Satisfactory (SPT) and Project Management Team (PMT)
Timeliness
(4)
Satisfactory Conducted 2 quarterly meetings with the School Planning Team
(SPT) and Project Management Team (PMT) 5 5
(3)
Unsatis factory Conducted 1 quarterly meeting with the School Planning
(2) Team(SPT) and Project Management Team (PMT)
Poor No quarterly meeting conducted
(1)
1.3. Utilized available August 6.50% Outstanding Community stakeholders' led the regular review and improvement
monitoring and 2022- July (5) process; the school stakeholders facilitated the process.
evaluation processes 2023

and tools to promote Very School community stakeholders worked as full partners and led the
learner achievement Satisfactory continual review and improvement of development plan
Quality
(4)
School led the review and improvement of the development plan 5 5
Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatis School conducted review of development plan
factory
(2)
(1)
Periodic utilization of DepEd-framed and school-framed M&E tools 5.00 0.325 0.325
Outstanding
(5)
Very Periodic utilization of DepEd-framed and infrequent use of school-
Satisfactory framed M & E tools
Timeliness
(4)
Satisfactory Infrequent/irregular utilization of DepEd-framed and school-framed
(3) M&E tools 5 5
Unsatis factory Infrequent/irregular utilization of school-framed M&E tools

(2)
(1) 5.00 0.325
2. MANAGING 2.1. Managed school August 6.50% Consistently performed management of school data using
Outstanding
SCHOOL data and information 2022- July technology, including ICT to ensure efficient and effective school
(5)
OPERATIONS using technology, 2023 operations.
AND including ICT to ensure Very Frequently performed management of school data using
RESOURCES efficient and effective Satisfactory technology, including ICT to ensure efficient and effective school
school operations. (4) operations.
Quality
Satisfactory Occasionallyperformed management of school data using
technology, including ICT to ensure efficient and effective school 5 5
(3)
operations.
Unsatis factory Rarely performed management of school data using technology,
(2) including ICT to ensure efficient and effective school operations.

(1)
Managed gathering and submission of school data to 5 out 6 online
systems required by the Department of Education
1. LIS
2. EBEIS
Outstanding 3. WinS
(5) 4. DPDS
5. e SAT
6. IPCRF/ORCF Online link
Efficiency
Very Managed gathering and submission of school data to 4 out 6 online 5 5
Satisfactory systems required by the Department of Education 5.00 0.325 5.00 0.325 0.325
(4)
Satisfactory Managed gathering and submission of school data to 3 out 6 online
(3) systems required by the Department of Education
Unsatis factory Managed gathering and submission of school data to 1 or 2 out 6

(2) online systems required by the Department of Education

(1)
Outstanding Submitted all online and offline required reports indicated in the
(5) MOV on or before the deadline
Very Submitted seven (7) to eight (8) online and three (3) offline required
Satisfactory reports indicated in the MOV on or before the deadline
(4)
Timeliness
Satisfactory Submitted five (5) to six (6) online and two (2) offline required
(3) reports indicated in the MOV on or before the deadline
5 5
Submitted three (3) to four (4) online reports and one (1) offline
Unsatis factory required report indicated in the MOV on or before the deadline
(2)
Poor Failed to submit all online and offline required reports indicated in
(1) the MOV on or before the deadline
2.2. Managed finances August 6.50% Consistently managed finances adhering to policies, guidelines and
adhering to policies, 2022- July Outstanding
(5) issuances in allocation, procurement, disbursement and liquidation
gudielines and issuances 2023 aligned with school plan
in allocation,
procurement, Very Satisfactory Frequently managed finances adhering to policies, guidelines and
disbursement and (4) issuances in allocation, procurement, disbursement and liquidation
liquidation aligned with aligned with school plan
Quality
school plan.
Satisfactory Occasionally managed finances adhering to policies, guidelines and 5 5
aligned with school plan
Unsatis factory Rarely managed finances adhering to policies, guidelines and

aligned with school plan
ices
Poor
(1) No acceptable evidence presented
Outstanding Utilized and liquidated an average of 96-100% of the MOOE and/or
(5)
other funds
5.00 0.325 5.00 0.325 0.325
Very Satisfactory Utilized and liquidatedan average of 91-95% of the MOOE and/or
(4)
other funds
Efficiency
Satisfactory Utilized and liquidatedan average of 86-90% of the MOOE and/or
(3) 5 5
other funds
Unsatis factory Utilized and liquidated an average of 81-85% of the MOOE and/or
(2)
other funds
Poor Utilized and liquidated an average of 80% and below of the MOOE
(1)
and/or other funds
Outstanding Utilized and liquidated the MOOE and other funds on time for all
(5) quarters
Very
Timeliness
Satisfactory Utilized and liquidated the MOOE and other funds on time for 3 of
Satisfactory
(4) the four quarters
Utilized and liquidated the MOOE and other funds on time for 2 of 5 5
(3)
Unsatis factory the four quarters
Utilized and liquidated the MOOE and other funds on time for 1 of
(2) the
Poor Zerofour quarters
utilization
(1)
2.3. Managed school August 6.50% Consistently managed school facilities and equipment in adherence
facilities and equipment 2022- July Outstanding to policies, guidelines and issuances on acquisition, recording,
in adherence to policies, 2023 (5) neutralization, repair and maintenance, storage and disposal.
guidelines and issuances
on acquisition, recording, Frequently managed school facilities and equipment in adherence
neutralization, repair and Very
to policies, guidelines and issuances on acquisition, recording,
maintenance, storage Satisfactory
neutralization, repair and maintenance, storage and disposal.
(4)
Quality
and disposal.
Occasionally managed school facilities and equipment in adherence 5 5
Satisfactory to policies, guidelines and issuances on acquisition, recording,
(3) neutralization, repair and maintenance, storage and disposal.
5.00 0.325 5.00 0.325 0.325
Rarely managed school facilities and equipment in adherence to
Unsatis factory policies, guidelines and issuances on acquisition, recording,
(2) neutralization, repair and maintenance, storage and disposal.

(1)
Outstanding Updated 100% of the reports required
Very
(5)
Efficiency
Satisfactory Updated 90% of the reports required

Satisfactory
(4) Updated 80% of the reports required 5 5
(3)
Unsatis factory Updated 70% of the reports required
(2)
Poor Updated 60% and below of the reports required
(1)
3. FOCUSING ON 3.1. Assisted teachers in August 6.50% Consistently assisted teachers in the review, contextualization and
TEACHING AND the review, 2022- July Outstanding implementation of learning standards to make the curriculum
LEARNING contextualization and 2023 (5) relevant for the learners.
implementation of
learning standards to Very Frequently assisted teachers in the review, contextualization and imp
make the curriculum Satisfactory
Quality
relevant for the learners (4)

Occasionally assisted teachers in the review, contextualization and i 5 5
Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatis factory Rarely assisted teachers in the review, contextualization and impleme
(2)
Poor No technical assistance provided
(1)
Localized curriculum is implemented and monitored closely to
ensure that it makes learning more meaningful and pleasurable,
Outstanding
produces desired learning outcomes, directly improves community
(5)
life and is benchmarked by other schools.
Very Localized curriculum is implemented and monitored closely to 4.67 0.303 4.67 0.303 0.303
Efficiency
Satisfactory ensure that it makes learning more meaningful and pleasurable,
(4) produces desired learning outcome, and directly improves 4 4
community life.
Localized curriculum is implemented to ensure that it makes
Satisfactory learning more meaningful and pleasurable, produces desired
(3) learning outcome, and directly improves community life.
Unsatis factory The implemented curriculum is localized to make it more meaningful
(2) to
Poor Nothe learners and
acceptable applicable
evidence to life and community.
presented
(1)
Outstanding Submitted TA plan for the suceeding month and TA reports 3 days
(5)
Very after a month
Submitted TA plan for the suceeding month and TA reports 4-5
Satisfactory days after a month

(4)
Timeliness
Satisfactory Submitted TA plan for the suceeding month and TA reports 6-7
(3) days after a month 5 5
Unsatis factory Submitted TA plan for the suceeding month and TA reports 8-9
(2) days after a month
Poor Submitted TA plan for the suceeding month and TA reports 10 days
(1) after a month
3.2. Utilized learning August 6.50% Consistently utilized learning outcomes in developing data-based
outcomes in developing 2022- July Outstanding interventions to maintain learner achievement and attain other
data-based interventions 2023 (5) performance indicators
to maintain learner Very
Quality
achievement and attain Satisfactory Frequently utilized learning outcomes in developing data-based 4 4
other performance Satisfactory
(4) interventions to maintain learner achievement and attain other
indicators Occasionally utilized learning outcomes in developing data-based
(3)
Unsatis factory performance indicators
interventions to maintain learner achievement and attain other
Rarely utilized learning outcomes in developing data-based
(2)
Poor performance indicators
interventions to maintain learner achievement and attain other
No acceptable evidence presented 4.50 0.293 4.50 0.293 0.293
(1) performance indicators
Utilized developed materials in 8 or more learning areas to improve
Outstanding performance
(5)
Efficiency
Very
Satisfactory Utilized developed materials in 6-7 learning areas to improve perfor
5 5
Satisfactory
(4) Utilized developed materials in 4-5 learning areas to improve perfor
(3)
Unsatis factory Utilized developed materials in 1-3 learning areas to improve perfor
(2)
(1)
3.3. Provided TA to August 6.50% Consistently provided TA to teachers in using learning assessment
teachers in using 2022- July Outstanding tools, strategies and results consistent with curriculum requirements
learning assessment 2023 (5) to ensure accountability in achieving higher learning outcomes
tools, strategies and
results consistent with Very Frequently provided TA to teachers in using learning assessment
curriculum requirements Satisfactory tools, strategies and results consistent with curriculum requirements
to ensure accountability (4) to ensure accountability in achieving higher learning outcomes
in achieving higher
Quality
learning outcomes Occassionally provided TA to teachers in using learning

Satisfactory assessment tools, strategies and results consistent with curriculum 5 5
(3) requirements to ensure accountability in achieving higher learning
outcomes
Rarely provided TA to teachers in using learning assessment tools,
Unsatis factory strategies and results consistent with curriculum requirements to
(2) ensure accountability in achieving higher learning outcomes

(1) 5.00 0.325 5.00 0.325 0.325
School assessment results were used to develop learning programs
Outstanding that are suited to community, and customized to each learners'
(5) context, results of which are used for collaborative-decision-making.
Very School assessment results wre used to develop learning programs
Satisfactory that are suited to community.
(4)
Efficiency
Satisfactory Assessment tools were reviewed by the school community and

assessment results are shared with community stakeholders. 5 5
(3)
The assessment tools were reviewed by the school and
Unsatis factory assessment results are shared with schools' stakeholders.
(2)
Poor The assessment tools were reviewed by the school.

(1)
4. DEVELOPING 4.1. Implemented August 6.50% Leaders consistently assumed responsibility for their own training
SELF AND professional 2022- July and development. School leaders working individually or in groups,
OTHERS development initiatives to 2023 coach, and mentor one another to achieve their VMG through the
Outstanding
enhance strengths and conduct of at least four (4) need-based professional development
(5)
address performance initiatives to enhance strengths and address performance gaps
gaps among school among school personnel by establishing Community of Practice
personnel (COP)
Leaders frequently undertook training modes that are convenient to
them (on-line, ofline, modular, group, or home-based) and which do
Very not disrupt the regular functions, leaders monitor and evaluate their
Satisfactory own learning progress through the conduct of three (3) need-based
Quality
(4) professional development initiatives to enhance strengths and
address performance gaps among school personnel 5 5
Structures developed by the leaders were in place and analysis of

the competency and development needs of leader was conducted; 5.00 0.325 5.00 0.325 0.325
Satisfactory result was used to develop a long-term training and development
(3) program through the conduct of two (2) need-based professional
development initiatives to enhance strengths and address
performance gaps among school personnel
Unsatis factory Leaders conducted one (1) need-based professional development

(2) initiative to enhance strengths and address performance gaps
Poor among school personnel
No acceptable evidence presented
(1)
Outstanding Conducted at least four (4) need-based professional development
Very
(5) initiatives
Conductedtothreeenhance strengths and address performance
developmentgaps
Efficiency
Satisfactory (3) need-based professional

Satisfactory among school
initiatives to personnel
enhance strengths and address performance gaps
(4) Conducted two (2) need-based professional development initiatives 5 5
(3)
Unsatis factory among
to enhanceschool personnel
strengths and address performance gaps among school
Conducted one (1) need-based professional development initiative
(2)
Poor personnel
to enhance strengths and address performance gaps among school
(1) personnel
4.2. Provided August 6.50% Outstanding 86-100% of the school personnel had performed leadership roles
opportunities to 2022- July (5) and responsibilities
individuals and teams in Very
2023
Quality
Satisfactory 71-85% of the school personnel had performed leadership roles and
performing leadership
Satisfactory
(4) responsibilities
56-70% of the school personnel had performed leadership roles and 5 5
roles and responsibilities
(3)
Unsatis factory responsibilities
41-55% of the school personnel had performed leadership roles and
(2)
Poor responsibilities
40% of the school personnel and below had performed leadership
(1) roles and responsibilities
Developed and supported personal and professional development
of individual and school management teams by providing equal

opportunities in the conduct of the following:
1. SLAC
Outstanding 2. School-INSETs
(5) 3. Assignments to task forces/committees/special projects
4. Job Rotations
5. Benchmarking
6. Coaching and Mentoring
4.50 0.293 4.50 0.293 0.293

Very
Efficiency
of individual and school management teams by providing equal

Satisfactory
opportunities in the conduct of any five (5) of the identified HRD 4 4
(4)
initiatives
Efficie
4 4

Satisfactory of individual and school management teams by providing equal
(3) opportunities in the conduct of any four (4) of the identified HRD
initiatives
Unsatis factory of individual and school management teams by providing equal
(2) opportunities in the conduct of any three (3) of the identified HRD
initiatives
Poor of individual and school management teams by providing equal
(1) opportunities in the conduct of any one (1) or two (2) of the
identified HRD initiatives
4.3. Implemented a August 6.50% Outstanding A community-accepted performance accountability, recognition and
school rewards system 2022- July (5) incentive system is being practiced CONSISTENTLY.
to recognize and Very
2023 A community-level accountability system is FREQUENTLY evolving
motivate learners, school Satisfactory
Quality
(4) from school-led
Performance inititatives. is practiced at the school level
accountability
personnel and other Satisfactory 5 5
stakeholders for (3) OCCASIONALLY.
exemplary performance Unsatis factory Performance accountability is RARELY practiced at the school
and/or continued support (2) level.
Poor Performance accountability is not practiced at the school level.
(1)
Conducted at least five (5) of the following activities:
1. Issuance of school policy guidelines/memo aligned with
Division Memorandum No. 113, s. 2020
2. Creation of Rewards and Recognition Committee
Outstanding 3. Selection of applicants 5.00 0.325 5.00 0.325 0.325
(5) 4. Development of selection criteria per category
5. Sourcing of funds (for prizes)
6. Awarding/Recognition ceremony/ies
Efficiency
5 5
Very Conducted at least four (4) of the identified activities
Satisfactory
(4)
Satisfactory Conducted at least three (3) of the identified activities
(3)
Unsatis factory Conducted at least two (2) of the identified activities
(2)
Poor Conducted at least one (1) of the identified activities
(1)
5. BUILDING 5.1. Built constructive August 6.50% Consistently built constructive relationships with authorities,
CONNECTIONS relationships with 2022- July Outstanding colleagues, parents and other stakeholders to foster an enabling
authorities, colleagues, 2023 (5) and supportive environment for learners
parents and other
stakeholders to foster an Very Frequently built constructive relationships with authorities,
enabling and supportive Satisfactory colleagues, parents and other stakeholders to foster an enabling
environment for learners (4) and supportive environment for learners
Quality
Occasionally built constructive relationships with authorities,

Satisfactory 5 5
colleagues, parents and other stakeholders to foster an enabling
(3) and supportive environment for learners
Rarely built constructive relationships with authorities, colleagues, 5.00 0.325 5.00 0.325 0.325
Unsatis factory parents and other stakeholders to foster an enabling and supportive
(2) environment for learners
(1)
Outstanding Conducted at least 7 activities with parents and other stakeholders
Very
(5) across four at
quarters with complete required documents.
Efficiency
Satisfactory Conducted least 5-6 activities with parents and other

Satisfactory
(4) stakeholders
Conducted atacross four
least 3-4 quarterswith
activities withparents
complete
andrequired
other 5 5
(3)
Unsatis factory documents. across four quarters with complete required
stakeholders
Conducted 1-2 activities with parents and other stakeholders across
(2)
Poor documents.
four quarters with complete required documents.
(1)
5.2. Communicated August 6.50% Consistently communicated effectively in speaking and in writing to
effectively in speaking 2022- July teachers, learners, parents and other stakeholders through positive
Outstanding
and in writing to 2023 use of communication platform to facilitate information sharing,
(5)
teachers, learners, collaboration and support.
parents and other
stakeholders through Frequently communicated effectively in speaking and in writing to
positive use of Very teachers, learners, parents and other stakeholders through positive
communication platform Satisfactory use of communication platform to facilitate information sharing,
to facilitate information (4) collaboration and support.
sharing, collaboration
Quality
and support. Occasionally communicated effectively in speaking and in writing to 5 5
teachers, learners, parents and other stakeholders through positive
Satisfactory
use of communication platform to facilitate information sharing,
(3)
collaboration and support.
Rarely communicated effectively in speaking and in writing to

teachers, learners, parents and other stakeholders through positive
Unsatis factory
use of communication platform to facilitate information sharing,
(2)
collaboration and support.
5.00 0.325 5.00 0.325 0.325
Poor No acceptable evidence
(1) presented
Accomplished, created and utilized five (5) of the following
communication platforms:
1. SMS
2. letters
3. tarpaulin
Outstanding 4. bandillo
(5) 5. FB page/FB account
6. radio broadcast
Efficiency
7. flyers
8. Others 5 5
Very Accomplished, created and utilized four (4) of the identified

Satisfactory communication platforms:
(4)
Satisfactory Accomplished, created and utilized three (3) of the identified
(3)
Unsatis factory communication platforms:
Accomplished, created and utilized one (1) or two (2) of the
(2)
Poor identified communication platforms
(1)
5.3. Initiated partnerships August 6.50% Initiated partnership activities based on the school size:
with the community such 2022- July • Mega School – at least 17
as parents, alumni, 2023 Outstanding • Large School – at least 14
authorities, industries (5) • Medium School – at least 9
and other stakeholders, • Small School – at least 5
to strengthen support for
learner development, as Initiated partnership activities based on the school size:
well as school and • Mega School – 13-16
community improvement. Very
• Large School – 11-13
Satisfactory
• Medium School –7-8
(4)
• Small School – 4
Quality
Initiated partnership activities based on the school size:

5 5
• Mega School – 9-12
Satisfactory • Large School – 8-10
(3) • Medium School – 5-6
5.00 0.325 5.00 0.325 0.325
Initiated partnership activities based on the school size:
Unsatis factory • Large School – 4-6
Poor Initiated partnership

(1) activities based on the
school size:
Outstanding Provided 7 partnership evidences to strengthen support for learner
(5) development and school and community improvement
Very
Efficiency
Provided 5-6 partnership evidences to strengthen support for
Satisfactory learner development and school and community improvement
(4) 5 5
Satisfactory Provided 3-4 partnership evidences to strengthen support for
(3)
Unsatis factory learner development and evidences
school and to
community improvement
Provided 1-2 partnership strengthen support for
(2)
Poor learner development andpresented
school and community improvement
No acceptable evidence
(1)
6. Plus Factor Performed related tasks 2.50% Performed any 5 of the following:
1. Facilitator/Resource speaker in trainings;
2. Acted as one of the writers of instructional
materials/modules/manuals in the division and/or higher level
3. Acted as consultant to any academic activities and/or any
management jobs;
4. Acted as member of district and/or higher level committees;
5. Conducted at least one (1) relevant research in any area within
the rating period;
6. Conducted innovation to address learning gaps;
7. Published educational article on any tabloid/spreadsheet/credible
Outstanding online-site of wide circulation
(5) 8. Member of district and higher level QA team
9. Acted as instructional coach/ District LAC leader

10. Member of TWG in the district and/or higher level
11. District and/or higher level awardee
12. Finalist of any division-initiated competition/contest/search
13. Recipient of special citation/recognition in the district and higher 5 5.00 0.125 5 5.00 0.125 0.125
level
14.
Very any 4 of the enumerated items

Satisfactory
(4)
Satisfactory any 3 of the enumerated items
(3)
Unsatis factory any 2 of the enumerated items
(2)
Poor any 1 of the enumerated items or no acceptable evidence
(1)
100% Final Rating 4.913 4.913 4.913
Adjectival Rating Scale Outstanding Outstanding O
RUDY GERALD M. BADILLO CHERYLL V. BERMUDO RAYMUNDO M. CANTONJOS, CESO VI

Ratee Rater Approving Authority
Adjectival Rating Scale
Outstanding 4.500- 5.000

Very Satisfactory. 3.500-4.499
Satisfactory 2.500-3.499
Unsatisfactory 1.500-2.499
Poor 1.000-1.499
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
Name of Employee: RUDY GERALD M. BADILLO

Position: T-III/TIC
School: BADLING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Rating Period: SY 2022-2023
Weight DOCUMENT VALIDATION (60%) ONSITE VALIDATION (40%)

Weight
Ratee's Validator's Ratee's Validator's
KRA Objectives No. per Score Signature Signature
KRA Objectives No. per Score Signature Signature Final Rating
Q E T Ave Objective Q E T Ave
Objective
Objective 1 6.5%#ERROR!
5 5.00 0.325 Objective 1 6.5% 5 5 5.00 0.325 0.325
Objective 2 6.5% 5 5 5 5.00 0.325 Objective 2 6.5% 5 5 5 5.00 0.325 0.325
KRA 1 KRA 1
Objective 3 6.5% 0 5 5.00 0.325 Objective 3 6.5% 5 5 5.00 0.325 0.325
TOTAL 19.5% 0.975 TOTAL 19.5% 0.975 0.975
Objective 1 6.5% 5 5 5 5.00 0.325 Objective 1 6.5% 5 5 5 #ERROR! ### #VALUE!
KRA 2 KRA 2
Objective 3 6.5%#ERROR!
5 5.00 0.325 Objective 3 6.5% 5 5 5.00 0.325 0.325
TOTAL 19.5% 0.867 TOTAL 19.5% ### #VALUE!
KRA 3 KRA 3
TOTAL 19.5% 0.921 TOTAL 19.5% 0.921 0.921
KRA 4 KRA 4
TOTAL 19.5% 0.942 TOTAL 19.5% 0.942 0.942
KRA 5 KRA 5
FINAL TOTAL 19.5% 0.975 FINAL TOTAL 19.5% 0.975 0.975
PERFO PERFO
RMANC
KRA 6 Plus Factor 2.5% RMANC
KRA 6 Plus Factor 2.5% 5 5.00 0.125 0.125
E 5 5.00 0.125 E
RESULT Accomplishments of Final Rating 4.805 RESUL Accomplishments of KRAs Final Rating ### #VALUE!
S KRAs and Objectives Adjectival Rating Outstanding TS and Objectives Adjectival Rating #VALUE! #VALUE!
Validating Team:
RIMSON N. PELAYO, PhD ANDRES V. LEQUIRON III, PhD LINA A. LIM, PhD
Team Leader Assistant Team Leader Member
OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
Name of Employee:
Position:
School:
Rating Period: SY 2022-2023
Weight ONSITE VALIDATION (40%)

Weight DOCUMENT VALIDATION (60%) Validator' Ratee's
Objective Ratee's Objective per Validator's
KRA No. per Score s KRA No. Score Signatur Final Rating
s Q E T Ave Signature s Objecti Q E T Ave Signature
Objective Signature e
ve
Objective 1 6.5% Objective 1 6.5%
KRA 1 KRA 1
TOTAL 19.5% TOTAL 19.5%
KRA 2 KRA 2
KRA 3 KRA 3
KRA 4 KRA 4
KRA 5 KRA 5
FINAL TOTAL 19.5% FINAL TOTAL 19.5%
PERFO PERFO
RMANC
KRA 6 Plus Factor 2.5% RMANC
KRA 6 Plus Factor 2.5%
E E
RESUL Accomplishments of Final Rating RESUL Accomplishments of Final Rating
TS KRAs and Objectives Adjectival Rating TS KRAs and Objectives Adjectival Rating
Validating Team:
RIMSON N. PELAYO, PhD ANDRES V. LEQUIRON III, PhD LINA A. LIM, PhD
Team Leader Assistant Team Leader Member
MEANS OF VERIFICATION
PERFORMANCE INDICA
MFO KRAs Objectives
QET QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIM
LEADING 1.1. Communicated the Outstanding
STRATEGICALLY DepEd vision, mission Documentation of six (6) activities con
(5) corresponding proofs of the modality u
and core values to the
wider school community Very Satisfactory Documentation of five (5) activities con
to ensure shared (4) corresponding proofs of the modality u
understanding and
Quality
alignment of school Satisfactory Documentation of four (4) activities co

policies, programs, (3) corresponding proofs of the modality u
projects and activities
Unsatis factory Documentation of three (3) activities c
(2) corresponding proofs of the modality u
Poor Documentation of one (1) to two (2) ac
(1) the corresponding proofs of the modal
Presence of any five (5) of the listed M
activity:
1. Memo
2. Minutes
3. Photo Documentation
4. Attendance Sheets
Outstanding
5. Proof of Distribution of Print Materia
(5)
6. Screenshots of Online Announceme
7. Tarpaulin
8. Letter Request for Radio Timeslot s
Efficiency
9. Link of Video Clips

10. Letter of Invitation to Stakeholders
Very Satisfactory Presence of any four (4) of the listed M

(4)
Satisfactory Presence of any three (3) of the listed
(3) activity
Unsatis factory Presence of any one or two (1 or 2) of

(2) conducted activity

(1)
ATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
UALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINESS
ntation of six (6) activities conducted within the year with the
onding proofs of the modality used
ntation of five (5) activities conducted within the year with the
ntation of four (4) activities conducted within the year with the
ntation of three (3) activities conducted within the year with the
ntation of one (1) to two (2) activities conducted within the year with
esponding proofs of the modality used
e of any five (5) of the listed MOVs for each of the conducted
o
es
Documentation
dance Sheets
of Distribution of Print Materials
nshots of Online Announcement
ulin
Request for Radio Timeslot stamped "Received"
f Video Clips
er of Invitation to Stakeholders stamped "Received"
e of any four (4) of the listed MOVs for each of the conducted activity
e of any three (3) of the listed MOVs for each of the conducted
e of any one or two (1 or 2) of the listed MOVs for each of the

ed activity
ptable evidence presented
Basic Education Serv
1.2. Developed and Presence of the listed MOVs:
implemented with the 1. Copy of approved AIP
planning team school 2. Accomplishment Report with docu
plans aligned with Project Management Team (PMT) not
institutional goals and 3. Signed Quarterly M&E Report sig
policies school head using the SMEA M and E
4. Signed Project Workplan and Bud
5. Memorandum on the conduct of A
Review is available;
6. Received copy of the letter of invi
the AIP Adjustment/Annual Performan
and team, SPT, PT, and support staff,
Outstanding stakeholders is available;
(5) 7. received copy of designation pap
documentation/minutes of the orientat
development guide formulated in cons
8. Attendance sheet showing presen
Quality
throughout the duration of the AIP Adj
9. Terms of reference indicating stak
Adjustment/Annual Performance Revi
10. Documentation report showing th
and formulation of AIP documents;
11.Approved LRP
Very Satisfactory Presence of MOV 1 to 9

(4)
Satisfactory Presence of MOV 1 to 7
(3)
Unsatis factory Presence of MOV 1 to 4
(2)
(1)
Outstanding 100% of school PPAs per approved A
(5)
Very Satisfactory 91-99% of school PPAs per approved
(4)
Efficiency
Satisfactory 81-90% of school PPAs per approved

(3)
Unsatis factory 71-80% of school PPAs per approved
(2)
Poor 70%and below of school PPAs per ap
Outstanding Conducted 4 quarterly meetings with t

(5) Project Management Team (PMT)
Very Satisfactory Conducted 3 quarterly meetings with t

Timeliness
Satisfactory Conducted 2 quarterly meetings with t

Unsatis factory Conducted 1 quarterly meeting with th
Poor No quarterly meeting conducted
(1)
ce of the listed MOVs:
py of approved AIP
omplishment Report with documentation signed by the School
Management Team (PMT) noted by the school head
ned Quarterly M&E Report signed by the PMT and noted by the
ead using the SMEA M and E tool
ned Project Workplan and Budget Matrix per PPA;
morandum on the conduct of AIP Adjustment/Annual Performance
s available;
ceived copy of the letter of invitation sent to identified participants in
Adjustment/Annual Performance Review such as the school head
m, SPT, PT, and support staff, with at least 3 community
ders is available;
eived copy of designation papers of the SPT, PT, and support staff;
ntation/minutes of the orientation meeting with photos/videos; draft
ment guide formulated in consultation with community stakeholders;
endance sheet showing presence of community stakeholders
out the duration of the AIP Adjustment/Annual Performance Review;
ms of reference indicating stakeholders leadership role in the AIP
ent/Annual Performance Review;
cumentation report showing the actual preparation of the AIP process
mulation of AIP documents;
oved LRP
e of MOV 1 to 9
e of MOV 1 to 7
e of MOV 1 to 4
school PPAs per approved AIP were implemented/completed
of school PPAs per approved AIP were implemented/completed
of school PPAs per approved AIP were implemented/complemeted
of school PPAs per approved AIP were implemented/completed
below of school PPAs per approved AIP were

nted/completed
ed 4 quarterly meetings with the School Planning Team (SPT) and
Management Team (PMT)
ed 1 quarterly meeting with the School Planning Team(SPT) and
terly meeting conducted
1.3. Utilized available 1. At least one (1) accomplished and
monitoring and evaluate each of the enumerated PPA
evaluation processes attendance sheet showing the review
and tools to promote 2. List of SIP Monitoring team;
learner achievement 3. Approved guidelines and activity m
cycle
Outstanding 4. Summary of findings, recommend
(5) to improve the plan;
5. Mid-year and year-end Project Mo
6.Approved draft SIP/AIP incorporatin
recommendation
7. Documentations with pictures sho
facilitators in the reviewing and improv
and signed M&E tool to track and eva

plus Memorandum, invitation, attenda
2. List of SIP Monitoring team;
3. Approved guidelines and activity m
SIPprevious cycIP;
Very Satisfactory 4. Summary of findings, recommend
6. Approved drat SIP/AIP incorporatin

recommendations;
Quality
1. At least one (1) accomplished an

evaluate two (2) of the enumerated PP
Memorandum, invitation, attendance s
Satisfactory 3. Approved guidelines and activity m
(3) cycIP;
4. Summary of findings, recommend
to improve the plan;
1. At least one (1) accomplished an

evaluate two (2) of the enumerated PP
Memorandum, invitation, attendance s
Unsatis factory 3. Approved guidelines and activity m
(2) 4. Summary of findings, recommend
to improve the plan;
1. Any one(1) of the following: Memo

showing the review of AIP; List of SIP
2. Approved guidelines and activity m
Poor
3. Summary of findings, recommend
Outstanding Utilized DepEd-framed and school-fra

(5)
Very Satisfactory Utilized DepEd-framed and school-fra
(4)
Timeliness
Satisfactory Utilized DepEd-framed and school-fra

(3)
Unsatis factory Utilized DepEd-framed and school-fra

(2)
east one (1) accomplished and signed M&E tool to track and
each of the enumerated PPAs plus Memorandum, invitation,
nce sheet showing the review of AIP;
of SIP Monitoring team;
proved guidelines and activity matrixon the review of SIPprevious
mmary of findings, recommendations and suggested AIP adjustments

ve the plan;
-year and year-end Project Monitoring Reports;
ved draft SIP/AIP incorporating the comments and suggestions and
endation
cumentations with pictures showing the stakeholders as the lead
rs in the reviewing and improving the Development Plan (e.g. SIP)
ned M&E tool to track and evaluate each of the enumerated PPAs
morandum, invitation, attendance sheet showing the review of AIP;
proved guidelines and activity matrix for reviewing S review of
ous cycIP;
ve the plan;
-year and year-end Project Monitoring Reports;
ved drat SIP/AIP incorporating the comments and suggestions and
endations;
two (2) of the enumerated PPAs plus any three (3) of the folllowing:
ndum, invitation, attendance sheet showing the review of AIP;
proved guidelines and activity matrix for reviewing S SIPprevious

ve the plan;
-year and year-end Project Monitoring Reports
two (2) of the enumerated PPAs plus any three (3) of the folllowing:
ndum, invitation, attendance sheet showing the review of AIP;
proved guidelines and activity matrix fr review of SIPprevious cyc
ve the plan;
one(1) of the following: Memorandum, invitation, attendance sheet

the review of AIP; List of SIP Monitoring team;
proved guidelines and activity matrix for reviewing SIP;
ve the plan;
DepEd-framed and school-framed M&E tools in all quarters
DepEd-framed and school-framed M&E tools in three quarters
DepEd-framed and school-framed M&E tools in two quarters
DepEd-framed and school-framed M&E tools in a quarter

Timeli
Poor No acceptable evidence was shown
(1)
2. MANAGING 2.1. Managed school Submission of all of the following onlin
SCHOOL data and information Online Reports:
OPERATIONS using technology, 1. Learner Information System (Earl
AND RESOURCES including ICT to ensure provided by the Planning Unit)
efficient and effective 2. Wash in School (WinS)rating
school operations. 3. Monthly DPDS Report (Partnersh
4.Screenshots of the acknowledged re
of School eSAT summary (first and
5. Screenshots of the acknowledged r
of RPMS Cycle
Outstanding 6. Brochure and booklet-type e-Scho
(5) 7. Generated acknowledgment rece
quarter (for discussion during the orien
8. LR Reports on the utilization of LR
Offline Reports:
1. PSIPOP (to be secured by the distr
Quality
2. SF4
3. Updated School Form 7
Very Satisfactory Absence of one (1) to two (2) evidence

(4)
Satisfactory Absence of three (3) to four (4) eviden
(3)
Unsatis factory Absence of five (5) to six (6)evidences

(2)
(1)
At least five (5) evidences of both onlin
Outstanding reports: 1. LIS 2. EBEIS 3. WinS 4.
(5) online link submission
At least 4 evidences of both online and
Very Satisfactory 1. LIS 2. EBEIS 3. WinS 4. DPDS
(4) submission
Efficiency

Satisfactory 1. LIS 2. EBEIS 3. WinS 4. DPDS
(3) submission
Unsatis factory 1. LIS 2. EBEIS 3. WinS 4. DPDS
(2) submission

(1)
Outstanding Submitted all the reports on or before
(5)
Very Satisfactory Submitted one (1) to two (2) evidence
(4)
Timeliness
Satisfactory Submitted three (3) to four (4) evidenc

(3)
ptable evidence was shown
sion of all of the following online/offline reports:

Reports:
rner Information System (Early enrolment, QC,BOSY, EOSY) (to be
d by the Planning Unit)
sh in School (WinS)rating
nthly DPDS Report (Partnership)
nshots of the acknowledged response from the uploads
ool eSAT summary (first and fourth phases)
nshots of the acknowledged response from the uploads
S Cycle
chure and booklet-type e-School Report Card (EOSY)
nerated acknowledgment receipt of the Uploaded SMEA Report per
for discussion during the orientation re generating the report)
Reports on the utilization of LRMS materials
Reports:
OP (to be secured by the district planning officer from the HR Unit)
4
dated School Form 7
e of one (1) to two (2) evidences of required reports
e of three (3) to four (4) evidences of required reports
e of five (5) to six (6)evidences
five (5) evidences of both online and offline learners and school
1. LIS 2. EBEIS 3. WinS 4. DPDS 5. eSAT 6. IPCRF/OPRCF
nk submission
4 evidences of both online and offline learners and school reports:
. EBEIS 3. WinS 4. DPDS 5. eSAT 6. IPCRF/OPRCF online link
ion
ion
ion
ed all the reports on or before the deadline
ed one (1) to two (2) evidences of reports after the deadline
ed three (3) to four (4) evidences of reports after the deadline

Timeliness
Submitted five (5) to six (6) evidences
Unsatis factory
(2)

(1)
2.2. Managed finances
adhering to policies,
guidelines and issuances
in allocation, Presence of all of the listed MOVs:
procurement, 1. Cash Disbursement Reports / Liquid
disbursement and (containing BAC Resolution)
liquidation aligned with
school plan. Outstanding 3. Utilization of other financial resourc
(5) on the SIP/AIP/SRC or (any of the foll
3. 1. PTA audited financial report sign
auditor with attached proof of expense
3. 2. Financial Report of LGU donation
Quality
3. 3. Financial report on Alumni assoc
3. 4. Financial report on school produ
3. 5. Financial report on Brigada Eskw
4. Updated Transparency Board/Inform
Very Satisfactory
(4) Absence of one (1) of the listed MOVs
Satisfactory
(3) Absence of two (2) of the listed MOVs
Unsatis factory
(2) Absence of three (3) of the listed MOV
Poor
(1) No acceptable evidence presented
Outstanding Certification of MOOE utilization from

(5) Utilization and liquidation reports of th
funds certified by Accounting Unit
Very Satisfactory Certification of MOOE utilization from

Efficiency
Satisfactory Certification of MOOE utilization from

Unsatis factory Certification of MOOE utilization from

(2) Utilization and liquidation reports repo
Poor Certification of MOOE utilization from

(1) Utilization and liquidation reports repo
and/ or other funds certified by Accoun
Outstanding Record of the on time utilization and li
(5) funds for the four quarters from the Di
Timeliness
Very Satisfactory Record of the on time utilization and li

(4) funds forofthe
Satisfactory Record thethree quarters
on time from and
utilization the Dl
(3) funds
Unsatis factory Recordforofthe
thetwo
on quarters from the
time utilization andDivli
(2)
Poor funds for one quarter from the Division
No utilization of the MOOE and/or othe
(1)
ed five (5) to six (6) evidences of reports after the deadline
e of all of the listed MOVs:

Disbursement Reports / Liquidation Reports MOOE and other funds
ng BAC Resolution)
ation of other financial resources/grants/assistance/donations based

IP/AIP/SRC or (any of the following)
A audited financial report signed by the president, treasurer and
with attached proof of expenses
ancial Report of LGU donations
nancial report on Alumni association
nancial report on school produce
nancial report on Brigada Eskwela donations with deed of donations
ed Transparency Board/Information Board
e of one (1) of the listed MOVs
e of two (2) of the listed MOVs
e of three (3) of the listed MOVs
ation of MOOE utilization from the accounting office showing

n and liquidation reports of the 96-100% of the MOOE and of other
rtified by Accounting Unit

n and liquidation reports of the 91-95% of the MOOE and/ or other
tion of MOOE utilization from the accounting office showing
n and liquidation reports of the 86-90% of the MOOE and/ or other
n and liquidation reports reports of the 81-85% MOOE and/ or other
tion of MOOE utilization from the accounting office showing

n and liquidation reports reports of the 80% and below of the MOOE
other funds certified by Accounting Unit
of the on time utilization and liquidation of the MOOE and/or other
r the four quarters from the Division accounting unit
of the on time utilization and liquidation of the MOOE and/or other
rofthe
thethree quarters
on time from and
utilization the Division accounting
liquidation unit and/or other
of the MOOE
r the
of thetwo
on quarters from the
time utilization andDivision accounting
liquidation unit and/or other
of the MOOE
r one of
ation quarter from the
the MOOE Division
and/or otheraccounting
funds unit
2.3. Managed school Presence of all of the following eviden
facilities and equipment 1. Annual Inventory report of school fa
in adherence to policies, 1. a. school buildings: classrooms a
guidelines and issuances 1. b. equipment (Science, TLE/TVL
on acquisition, recording, 1. c. computer sets and printers with
neutralization, repair and 1. d. tables and chairs with property
maintenance, storage 1. e. handwashing facilities
and disposal. 1. f. toilets
1. g. furniture
2. Books and other learning materials
2. 1. Inventory of Books
2.2 Inventory of TGs
2. 3. Inventory of LGs
2. 4. Inventory of IMs
Outstanding 3. List of Donations
(5) 3. 1. School Facilities
3.2. Books and other learning mate
4. Repair and maintenance/upkeeping
facilities (pictures of before, during and
5. Structured classrooms, comfort roo
Quality
Presence of segregated waste facilitie
7. Functional health facilities
8. Logbook of utilization of school equ
9. Disposal/demolition report, if any
10. Site Development Plan
11. Site Acquisition/Titling or any actio
Absence of one (1) of the listed MOVs

Very Satisfactory
(4)
Absence of two (2) of the listed MOVs
Satisfactory
(3)
Absence of three (3) of the listed MOV
Unsatis factory
(2)
Poor Absence of four (4) or more of the liste

(1)
Outstanding Evidences/documentation as to the u
(5) Satisfactory
Very
Efficiency
Evidences/documentation as to the
(4)
Satisfactory Evidences/documentation as to the u
(3)
Unsatis factory Evidences/documentation as to the u
(2)
Poor Evidences/documentation as to the u
(1)
3. FOCUSING ON 3.1. Assisted teachers in a. TA plan approved by the PSDS
TEACHING AND the review, b. copy of contextualized lessons per
LEARNING contextualization and sheets, SLMs, and worksheets review
implementation of b.1. Mega School – at least 20
learning standards to b.2. Large School – at least 16
make the curriculum Outstanding b.3. Medium School – at least 12
relevant for the learners (5) b.4. Small School – at least 8
c. photo-documentation of the utilizatio
d. quarterly inventory of TA outputs. D
report, pictures, samples) showing TA
e of all of the following evidences:
al Inventory report of school facilities
school buildings: classrooms and laboratories
equipment (Science, TLE/TVL, Math, etc.) with property stickers
omputer sets and printers with property stickers
ables and chairs with property stickers
andwashing facilities
ilets
urniture
s and other learning materials
nventory of Books
ventory of TGs
nventory of LGs
nventory of IMs
Donations
School Facilities
ooks and other learning materials
r and maintenance/upkeeping of school physical structures and
(pictures of before, during and after repair)
tured classrooms, comfort rooms, ICT lab/room, directory, stage 6.
e of segregated waste facilities
ional health facilities
ook of utilization of school equipment
sal/demolition report, if any
Development Plan
Acquisition/Titling or any action/move for titling
e of one (1) of the listed MOVs
e of two (2) of the listed MOVs
e of three (3) of the listed MOVs
e of four (4) or more of the listed MOVs
es/documentation as to the updating (as of December 31, 2021) of 10

ces/documentation as to the updating of 90% of the reports required
es/documentation as to the updating of 80% of the reports required s
es/documentation as to the updating of 70% of the reports required s
es/documentation as to the updating of 60% and below of the reports
an approved by the PSDS
of contextualized lessons per quarter such as learning activity
SLMs, and worksheets reviewed by the SH
ga School – at least 20
ge School – at least 16
dium School – at least 12
all School – at least 8
-documentation of the utilization of the contextualized lessons,
erly inventory of TA outputs. District stamped TA reports (narrative
ictures, samples) showing TA provision
a. TA plan approved by the PSDS
b. copy of contextualized lessons per
sheets, SLMs, and worksheets review
b.1. Mega School – at least 16
Very Satisfactory b.2. Large School – at least 12
(4) b.3. Medium School – at least 8
b.4. Small School – at least 4
report, pictures, samples)
Quality
b.2. Large School – at least 8
Satisfactory
b.3. Medium School – at least 4
(3)
b.4. Small School – at least 2

Unsatis factory b.2. Large School – at least 4
(2) b.3. Medium School – at least 2
b.4. Small School – only 1
Poor Absence of any of the non negotiable
(1)
Presence of all of the following:
1. Documentation Report/Certificate
localize the curriculum
2. Local Heritage Matrix/Local Herit
3. Contextualized Curriculum Matrix
4. Inventory of localized and indige
5. Organized School Level Learning
6. Evaluation Tools for localized Lea
7. Record of utilization of downloade
8. Record of the quality assured loca
Outstanding school, district, division level
(5) 9. Functional school library/LRC/mo
mini-libraries
10. Monitoring report of the of the loc
Efficiency
11. Records of locally-developed LRs

published or widely-circulated
12. Report/record of community enga
services/immersion in communities
Presence of MOV 1 to 10
Very Satisfactory
(4)
Presence of MOV 1 to 6
Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatis factory Presence of MOV 1 to 3
(2)
ictures, samples)

ictures, samples)

all School – only 1
ictures, samples)
e of any of the non negotiable indicators
e of all of the following:

cumentation Report/Certificates of Participation in workshops to
the curriculum
cal Heritage Matrix/Local Heritage Materials
ntextualized Curriculum Matrix per learning area
entory of localized and indigenized teaching and learning materials
anized School Level Learning Resource Evaluators
luation Tools for localized Learning Resources
cord of utilization of downloaded materials from the LR portal
cord of the quality assured locally-developed LRs utilized at the
district, division level
ctional school library/LRC/mobile library/library corner/classroom
aries
nitoring report of the of the localized curriculum
cords of locally-developed LRs published in the LR portal/printed,
d or widely-circulated
port/record of community engagement/program/extension
/immersion in communities
e of MOV 1 to 10
e of MOV 1 to 6
e of MOV 1 to 3
(1)
Outstanding Submitted TA plan for the suceeding m
(5) month
Very Satisfactory Submitted TA plan for the suceeding m
(4) month
Timeliness
Satisfactory Submitted TA plan for the suceeding m
(3) month
Unsatis factory Submitted TA plan for the suceeding m

(2) month
Poor Submitted TA plan for the suceeding m
(1) month
3.2. Utilized learning 1. Enrolment Data by ALL Type of le
outcomes in developing 2. Assessment Tools and Database
data-based interventions Tools MFAT (SPED) ECD Checklist (E
to maintain learner Language Mapping
achievement and attain 3. Report on the Analysis of Assess
other performance Teacher-made tests (with TOS), Other
indicators (least learned skills and performance g
4. Availability of CGs, TGs. LMs, etc
with special needs (if applicable), IPs,
Modules (if applicable), Modules for A
Home Schooling (if applicable)
5. Supervisory Plan, Instructional Su
6. Action plans, accomplishment, do
Outstanding implementation of programs and proje
(5) (submitted & received by the district/S
7. Intervention action plans, M&E Re
Quality
documentation reports on implementa

8. Documentation report of LAC Ses
9. Intervention Reports (e.g. SIM, Ac
10. School rewards/awards program
11. Instructional monitoring report/ane
monitoring
12. Results of Academic Contests, Aw
received
13. School Paper, website/PLNs or o
14. Report of Participation of students
school
15. Documentation that the school ha
Very Satisfactory Presence
of of items
Appreciation, 1 to 11
etc.)
(4)
Satisfactory Presence of items 1 to 6
(3)
Unsatis factory Presence of items 1 to 3
(2)
(1)
Sample of validated intervention/mate
Outstanding or more learning areas
(5)
Efficiency
Very Satisfactory Sample of validated intervention/mate

(4)
Satisfactory learning areas
(3)
Unsatis factory learning areas
(2)
Poor learning areas
(1)
ed TA plan for the suceeding month and TA reports 3 days after a
ed TA plan for the suceeding month and TA reports 4-5 days after a
ed TA plan for the suceeding month and TA reports 10 days after a
olment Data by ALL Type of learners

essment Tools and Database of Assessment Results Diagnostric
FAT (SPED) ECD Checklist (Elem)Reading Inventory Numeracy
ge Mapping
port on the Analysis of Assessment results: NAT (if applicable),
-made tests (with TOS), Other Summative Assessment Results
arned skills and performance gaps)
ilability of CGs, TGs. LMs, etc. for other types of learners : Students
cial needs (if applicable), IPs, Muslim Learners (if applicable), ALS
(if applicable), Modules for ADM (Open High School, MISOSA,
chooling (if applicable)
pervisory Plan, Instructional Supervision Report
on plans, accomplishment, documentation reports on
ntation of programs and projects that address learners’ needs
ed & received by the district/SDO)
rvention action plans, M&E Reports, accomplishment,
ntation reports on implementation of initiated PAPs
cumentation report of LAC Sessions
rvention Reports (e.g. SIM, Actions Research, Best Practice)
ool rewards/awards program
ructional monitoring report/anecdotal report/other proofs of
ng
sults of Academic Contests, Awards, Certificates of Commendation
ool Paper, website/PLNs or other means to showcase best practices

port of Participation of students and teachers in activities outside the
cumentation that the school has been benchmarked (Logbook, Letter

eciation,
of items 1 to 11
etc.)
e of items 1 to 6
e of items 1 to 3
of validated intervention/materials accomplished by the learner in 8
learning areas
of validated intervention/materials accomplished by the learner in 6-7

areas
areas
gptable
areas evidence presented
3.3. Provided TA to Copy of coaching/mentoring form sign
teachers in using issued school memo on the conduct o
learning assessment proposal and/or SDS-approved L and
tools, strategies and 2. Copy of agreement form signed b
results consistent with validated contextualized assessment t
curriculum requirements 3. Accomplished COT
to ensure accountability a. Mega School – 8 per quarter
in achieving higher b. Large School – 6 per quarter
learning outcomes c. Medium School - 4 per quarter
d. Small School – 2 per quarter
Outstanding 4. Any five (5) of the following accep
(5) a. attendance sheet
b. sample copy of validated assessm
c. sample of test item analysis,
d. sample of lesson design on least
e. sample of authentic assessment m
Quality
f. sample of revised assessment too
g. copy of the adjusted assessment
Very Satisfactory Any four (4) of the acceptable MOVs

(4)
Satisfactory Any three (3) of the acceptable MOVs

(3)
Unsatis factory Any two (2) of the acceptable MOVs

(2)
Poor Any one (1) of the acceptable MOVs

(1)
1. Creation of Assessment Review T
2. Evidence of Reviewed Assessme
sample Pupils'/Students' Portfolio with
Students' Journals with rubrics and oth
Reflection Paper, Students' Researche
as Culminating Activities, Simulation a

with TOS and/or Summative Tests
Outstanding 5. Documentation of the Review of A
(5) conducted by school community and s
6. Evidences of modification of asse
gathered from the FGD
7. Assessment results are conveyed
and other appropriate online or offline
Efficiency
8. Documents on the Learning Prog

assessment
Very Satisfactory Presence of items 1 to 7

(4)

(3)
Presence of items 1 to 2
Unsatis factory
(2)
coaching/mentoring form signed by the coached and the coach,
chool memo on the conduct of said activity, SDS-approved INSET
l and/or SDS-approved L and D plan (including LAC Sessions)
py of agreement form signed by the SH and teacher, sample of
d contextualized assessment tool.
omplished COT
ga School – 8 per quarter
ge School – 6 per quarter
dium School - 4 per quarter
all School – 2 per quarter
five (5) of the following acceptable evidences/MOVs:
ndance sheet
mple copy of validated assessment tool
mple of test item analysis,
mple of lesson design on least mastered competencies,
mple of authentic assessment materials,
mple of revised assessment tool,
y of the adjusted assessment tool per assessment result.
(4) of the acceptable MOVs
e (3) of the acceptable MOVs
ation of Assessment Review Team with terms of reference

dence of Reviewed Assessment Tool/s on written work such as
Pupils'/Students' Portfolio with specific rubrics; sample Pupils'
s' Journals with rubrics and other written work like Reaction of
on Paper, Students' Researches, etc.
dence of Reviewed Assessment Tool/s on Performance Task such
inating Activities, Simulation and Actual Performance of Task/s
dence of Reviewed Assessment Tool/s on Quarterly Examinations
S and/or Summative Tests
cumentation of the Review of Assessment Tools (FGD, meeting)
ed by school community and stakeholders
dences of modification of assessment tools based on the suggestions
d from the FGD
essment results are conveyed to stakeholders through assemblies
er appropriate online or offline strategies
cuments on the Learning Programs/Activities developed as a result of
ment
e of items 1 to 7
e of items 1 to 4
e of items 1 to 2
(1)
4. DEVELOPING 4.1. Implemented 1. L&D Needs Report of the school a
SELF AND professional Captain, 4Ps leaders, NGO President,
OTHERS development initiatives to 2. Capacity-building program plan b
enhance strengths and 3. Implementation plan showing the
address performance stakeholders)
gaps among school 4. Training Plan ( inclusion of GAD,
personnel Outstanding leaders including funding source
(5) 5. Inclusion of training plans in the A
6. Training Report
7. Monitoring and evaluation report o
8. Documentation implementation o
Quality
involving school community leaders (F

(4)
(3)
Unsatis factory Presence of items 1 to 3
(2)
(1)
Completion report/documentation of fo
development initiatives:
1. School INSET,
2. TIP,
Outstanding 3. Coaching and Mentoring,
(5) 4. 10 LAC sessions,
Efficiency
5. Job Rotations,
6. Benchmarking
Very Satisfactory Completion report/documentation of th

(4)
Satisfactory development initiatives
Completion report/documentation of tw
(3)
Unsatis factory development initiatives
Completion report/documentation of o
(2)
Poor development initiatives
(1)
4.2. Provided Outstanding Documentation/certification of perform
opportunities to (5) of 86-100% of the school personnel
individuals and teams in Very Satisfactory

Quality
Documentation/certification of perform
performing leadership (4)
Satisfactory of 71-85% of the school personnel
roles and responsibilities
(3)
Unsatis factory of 56-70% of the school personnel
(2)
Poor of 41-55% of the school personnel
(1) of 40% of the school personnel and be
in the conduct of the enumerated activ
1. SLAC
2. School INSET
Outstanding 3. Assignments to Task Forces/Com
(5) 4. Job Rotations
5. Benchmarking
6. Coaching and Mentoring
Efficiency
Very Satisfactory
in the conduct of any five (5) of the en
(4)
D Needs Report of the school and community leaders (Barangay

4Ps leaders, NGO President, etc.)
pacity-building program plan based on the identified L&D needs
lementation plan showing the budget source (GAA from the
ders)
ning Plan ( inclusion of GAD, Child Protection, etc.) for community
including funding source
usion of training plans in the AIP/PPMP
ning Report
nitoring and evaluation report on the conduct of the trainings/ TA
cumentation implementation of Community of Practice (COP)
g school community leaders (FGD, etc.)
e of items 1 to 7
e of items 1 to 5
e of items 1 to 3

ion report/documentation of four (4) of the following professional
ment initiatives:
ool INSET,
,
aching and Mentoring,
LAC sessions,
Rotations,
nchmarking
ion report/documentation of three (3) of the following professional

ment initiatives
ion report/documentation of two (2) of the following professional
ment initiatives
ion report/documentation of one (1) of the following professional
ment
ptableinitiatives
evidence presented
ntation/certification of performed leadership roles and responsibilities
0% of the school personnel
% of the school personnel
of the school personnel and belowleadership roles and responsibilities
ntation/certification of performed
nduct of the enumerated activities:
AC
ool INSET
ignments to Task Forces/Committees/special projects
Rotations
nchmarking
aching and Mentoring

nduct of any five (5) of the enumerated activities
Efficiency
Satisfactory Documentation/certification of perform
(3) in the conduct of any four (4) of the en
Unsatis factory Documentation/certification of perform

(2) in the conduct of any three (3) of the e
Poor Documentation/certification of perform

(1) in the conduct of any one (1) or two (2
4.3. Implemented a Presence of all of the following:

school rewards system 1. Minutes of Consultative Meetings
to recognize and Mechanism (School Memo, School Bu
motivate learners, school 2. Documentations including the app
personnel and other (certificate of accreditation)
stakeholders for 3. List of Stakeholders as Members
exemplary performance Outstanding 4. Documentation on objectively ver
and/or continued support (5) awardees/donors among others);
Quality
5. Resolutions on Incentives and Re
6. List of awardees in different categ
7. Documentation of activities condu

(4)
(3)
Unsatis factory Presence of item 1
(2)
(1)
Conducted at least five (5) of the follow
1. Issuance of school policy/guidelin
Memorandum No, 113, s. 2020
2. Creation of Rewards and Recogn
Outstanding 3. Selection of applicants
(5) 4. Development of selection criteria
5. Sourcing of funds (for prizes
Efficiency
6. Awarding/Recognition Ceremony/
Very Satisfactory Conducted at least four (4) of the iden

(4)
Satisfactory Conducted at least three (3) of the ide
(3)
Unsatis factory Conducted at least two (2) of the ident
(2)
Poor Conducted at least one (1) of the iden
(1)
5. BUILDING 5.1. Built constructive Presented all of the following evidence

CONNECTIONS relationships with photo documentation:
authorities, colleagues, 1.Terms of Reference (TOR) of Memb
parents and other responsibilities/Job Description
stakeholders to foster an 2. Written Designation of accountable
enabling and supportive regulations (as applicable) of SIP such
environment for learners School PMT
3. Constitution and By-laws (PTA, SG
Outstanding 4. Code of Conduct/Documentation of
(5) of the RA 6713
5. Ratified/Amended Constitution and
6. MOA/MOU/Board Resolution (as ap
Non-negotiable:
Addressed a grievance within the scho
Quality
nduct of any four (4) of the enumerated activities
nduct of any three (3) of the enumerated activities
nduct of any one (1) or two (2) of the enumerated activities
e of all of the following:

utes of Consultative Meetings on Rewards and Incentives System
sm (School Memo, School Bulletin, Guidelines, Committees);
cumentations including the approved school R&R Programs
te of accreditation)
of Stakeholders as Members of School PRAISE
cumentation on objectively verifiable indicators (list of
es/donors among others);
solutions on Incentives and Rewards System (LGU, NGO, BLGU);
of awardees in different categories;
cumentation of activities conducted (sample program, pictures)
e of items 1 to 4
e of items 1 to 2
e of item 1
ed at least five (5) of the following activities:
uance of school policy/guidelines/memo aligned with Division
ndum No, 113, s. 2020
ation of Rewards and Recognition Committee
ection of applicants
velopment of selection criteria per category
urcing of funds (for prizes
arding/Recognition Ceremony/ies
ed at least four (4) of the identified activities

ed at least three (3) of the identified activities
ed at least two (2) of the identified activities
ed at least one (1) of the identified activities
ed all of the following evidences with corresponding minutes and

ocumentation:
of Reference (TOR) of Members /List of Roles and
bilities/Job Description
n Designation of accountable persons based on applicable rules and
ons (as applicable) of SIP such as the school project team and
PMT
itution and By-laws (PTA, SGC and others)
of Conduct/Documentation of the School adoption and observance
A 6713
ed/Amended Constitution and By-laws (as applicable)
MOU/Board Resolution (as applicable)
gotiable:
ed a grievance within the school level
Quality
Presence of items 1 to 4 and the non-
Very Satisfactory Presence of a grievance which can be
(4) elevated to the schools district
Presence of items 1 to 2 and the non-

Satisfactory Presence of a grievance which can be
(3) levels but elevated to the schools divis
Presence of item 1 and the non-negot

Unsatis factory can be addressed in the school , distri
(2) the regional office
Poor Presence of a grievance which can be
(1) division levels butat
elevated to the cent
Have conducted least 7 relevant ac
as:
1. Letters of Invitation
Outstanding 2. Memoranda
(5) 3. Attendance Sheets
4. Minutes of Meetings
Efficiency
5. Photo documentations
Very Satisfactory Have conducted at least 5-6 relevant

(4)
Satisfactory identified documents
Have conducted at least 3-4 relevant
(3)
Unsatis factory identified documents
Have conducted at least 1-2 relevant
(2)
Poor identified documents
(1)
5.2. Communicated Have presented all of the following evi
effectively in speaking 1. Documentation of School Assemb
and in writing to 2. State of the School Address (SOS
teachers, learners, 3. Updated School Report Card (SR
parents and other 4. All SF 9 (Report Cards are signe
stakeholders through 5. Learners Profile with Anecdotal R
positive use of Outstanding 6. Formulated School Policy Guideli
communication platform (5) 7. Presented/Communicated SRCs
to facilitate information 8. LGU/Community Resolutions/Mu
sharing, collaboration the activities for the total development
and support. and Brigada Basa/ Pagbasa etc.)
Quality
9. Manual/Handbook on learning an
Have presented items 1 to 7

Very Satisfactory
(4)
Satisfactory Have presented items 1 to 4

(3)
Unsatis factory Have presented items 1 to 2

(2)
Poor
(1)
e of items 1 to 4 and the non-negotiable:
e of a grievance which can be addressed in the school level but
to the schools district
e of items 1 to 2 and the non-negotiable:

e of a grievance which can be addressed in the school and district
ut elevated to the schools division
e of item 1 and the non-negotiable: Presence of a grievance which

addressed in the school , district, and division levels but elevated to
onal office
e of a grievance which can be addressed in the school, district, and

levels butat
onducted elevated to the central
least 7 relevant office/national
activities complaint
in a year with deskssuch
documents
rs of Invitation
oranda
dance Sheets
es of Meetings
documentations
onducted at least 5-6 relevant activities in a year with all the

donducted
documentsat least 3-4 relevant activities in a year with all the
donducted
documentsat least 1-2 relevant activities in a year with all the
dptable
documents
evidence presented
esented all of the following evidences such as:
cumentation of School Assemblies and Meetings
te of the School Address (SOSA)
dated School Report Card (SRC) - Mid-Year and year-end
SF 9 (Report Cards are signed by the parents)
rners Profile with Anecdotal Records
mulated School Policy Guidelines on learner development activities
sented/Communicated SRCs to stakeholders
U/Community Resolutions/Municipal/Barangay Ordinance supporting
ities for the total development of learners (such as Brigada Eskwela
ada Basa/ Pagbasa etc.)
nual/Handbook on learning and monitoring system is available
esented items 1 to 7

Documentation showing communicatio
(SRC, SIP/AIP, LRP, ) through the us
platforms such as :
1. text
2. letters/memo
Outstanding 3. tarpaulin
(5) 4. bandillo
5. FB page/FB account
6. radio broadcast
7. flyers
8. Others
Efficiency
Very Satisfactory (SRC, SIP/AIP, LRP) through the use
(4) platforms

Satisfactory (SRC, SIP/AIP, LRP) through the use
(3) platforms

Unsatis factory (SRC, SIP/AIP,LRP) through the use
(2) platforms
ntation showing communication of the non-negotiable documents
IP/AIP, LRP, ) through the use of any five (5) communication
s such as :
ers/memo
aulin
dillo
page/FB account
o broadcast
rs
ers
ntation showing communication the non-negotiable documents

IP/AIP, LRP) through the use of any four (4) communication
s

IP/AIP, LRP) through the use of any three (3) communication
s

IP/AIP,LRP) through the use of any one to two (1-2) communication
s
(1)
5.3. Initiated partnerships Evidences of initiated partnership activ
with the community such
as parents, alumni, Outstanding • Large School – at least 14
authorities, industries (5) • Medium School – at least 9
and other stakeholders, • Small School – at least 5
to strengthen support for
learner development, as Evidences of initiated partnership activ
well as school and • Mega
community improvement. Very Satisfactory • Large School – 11-13
(4) • Medium School –7-8
Evidences of initiated partnership activ

• Mega
Quality
Satisfactory • Large School – 8-10

• Mega
Unsatis factory • Large School – 4-6

• Mega
Poor • Large School – 0-3

• Small School – 0-1
Have presented all of the following evi

1. Directory of school and community
contact information such as; email, ce
2. List of LGUs, NGAs, NGOs, Alumni

with previous engagement.
3. Copy of Pledge of Commitment indi

support in making decisions and/or so
4. Availability of any of the ff: reports;
a. Incident Reports
b. Spot Reports
Outstanding c. Intake Sheets
(5) d. Referral Slips
5.Invitation letters, Attendance Sheets
Efficiency
Photos/Videos or other related docum

problem/s and proposing solutions are
6.Copy of Memorandum of Agreemen
between the school and identified com
particular school problem is available.
7. List of completed programs and pro
the community stakeholders
Very Satisfactory Have presented items 1 to 5

(4)
Satisfactory Have presented items 1 to 3
(3)
Unsatis factory Have presented items 1 to 2
(2)
es of initiated partnership activities depending on the school size:
• Mega School – at least 17
ge School – 11-13
dium School –7-8
all School – 4

ge School – 8-10
dium School – 5-6
all School – 3

ge School – 4-6
dium School – 3-4
all School – 2

ge School – 0-3
dium School – 0-2
all School – 0-1
esented all of the following evidences such as:

ctory of school and community leaders with their names and updated
nformation such as; email, cellphone number are available.
LGUs, NGAs, NGOs, Alumni and other partners for the last 5 years
vious engagement.
of Pledge of Commitment indicating school and community leaders’

in making decisions and/or solving school problems is available.
ability of any of the ff: reports;
dent Reports
ot Reports
ke Sheets
erral Slips
on letters, Attendance Sheets, Minutes of the Meeting with
Videos or other related documents of leaders’ discussing school
/s and proposing solutions are available.
of Memorandum of Agreement/Understanding entered/forged
the school and identified community leaders/members addressing a
r school problem is available.
completed programs and projects implemented in collaboration with
munity stakeholders
(1)
6. Plus Factor Performed related tasks Presented MOVs on any 5 of the item
1. Facilitator/Resource speaker in train
2. Acted as one of the writers of instru
the division and/or higher level
3. Acted as consultant to any academ
jobs;
4. Acted as member of district and/or h
5. Conducted at least one (1) relevant
period;
6. Conducted innovation to address le
Outstanding 7. Published educational article on any
(5) site of wide circulation
8. Member of district and higher level

9. Acted as instructional coach/ Distric
10. Member of TWG in the district and
11. District and/or higher level awarde
12. Finalist of any division-initiated com
13. Recipient of special citation/recogn
14. Host of any district or d
Very Satisfactory MOVs of any 4 of the enumerated item

(4)
Satisfactory MOVs of any 3 of the enumerated ite
(3)
Unsatis factory MOVs of any 2 of the enumerated item
(2)
Poor MOV of any 1 of the enumerated item
(1)
ed MOVs on any 5 of the items listed below
ator/Resource speaker in trainings;
as one of the writers of instructional materials/modules/manuals in
ion and/or higher level
as consultant to any academic activities and/or any management
as member of district and/or higher level committees;

ucted at least one (1) relevant research in any area within the rating
ucted innovation to address learning gaps;

shed educational article on any tabloid/spreadsheet/credible online-
ide circulation
ber of district and higher level QA team
as instructional coach/ District LAC leader
mber of TWG in the district and/or higher level
ict and/or higher level awardee
list of any division-initiated competition/contest/search
pient of special citation/recognition in the district and higher level
14. Host of any district or division activity
of any 4 of the enumerated items
of any 3 of the enumerated items
f any 2 of the enumerated items
any 1 of the enumerated items or no acceptable evidence

FINAL_OPCRF-for-School-Heads-SY-2022-2023-Arado

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

FINAL_OPCRF-for-School-Heads-SY-2022-2023-Arado

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

NAME OF EMPLOYEE: RUDY GERALD M. BADILLO NAME OF RATER: CHERYLL V. BERMUDO

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Poor No acceptable evidence presented

Outstanding Conducted 4 quarterly meetings with the School Planning Team

evaluation processes 2023

Unsatis factory Infrequent/irregular utilization of school-framed M&E tools

Poor No acceptable evidence presented

Unsatis factory Managed gathering and submission of school data to 1 or 2 out 6

Poor No acceptable evidence presented

Unsatis factory Rarely managed finances adhering to policies, guidelines and

(2) neutralization, repair and maintenance, storage and disposal.

Satisfactory Updated 90% of the reports required

relevant for the learners (4)

Satisfactory days after a month

learning outcomes Occassionally provided TA to teachers in using learning

Poor No acceptable evidence presented

Satisfactory Assessment tools were reviewed by the school community and

Poor The assessment tools were reviewed by the school.

Structures developed by the leaders were in place and analysis of

Unsatis factory Leaders conducted one (1) need-based professional development

Satisfactory (3) need-based professional

of individual and school management teams by providing equal

Developed and supported personal and professional development

of individual and school management teams by providing equal

Developed and supported personal and professional development

Occasionally built constructive relationships with authorities,

Satisfactory Conducted least 5-6 activities with parents and other

Rarely communicated effectively in speaking and in writing to

Very Accomplished, created and utilized four (4) of the identified

Initiated partnership activities based on the school size:

Poor Initiated partnership

9. Acted as instructional coach/ District LAC leader

Very any 4 of the enumerated items

RUDY GERALD M. BADILLO CHERYLL V. BERMUDO RAYMUNDO M. CANTONJOS, CESO VI

Adjectival Rating Scale

Outstanding 4.500- 5.000

Name of Employee: RUDY GERALD M. BADILLO

Weight DOCUMENT VALIDATION (60%) ONSITE VALIDATION (40%)

Weight ONSITE VALIDATION (40%)

alignment of school Satisfactory Documentation of four (4) activities co

9. Link of Video Clips

Very Satisfactory Presence of any four (4) of the listed M

Unsatis factory Presence of any one or two (1 or 2) of

Poor No acceptable evidence presented

UALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINESS

e of any one or two (1 or 2) of the listed MOVs for each of the

Very Satisfactory Presence of MOV 1 to 9

Satisfactory 81-90% of school PPAs per approved

Outstanding Conducted 4 quarterly meetings with t

Very Satisfactory Conducted 3 quarterly meetings with t

Satisfactory Conducted 2 quarterly meetings with t

ptable evidence presented

school PPAs per approved AIP were implemented/completed

of school PPAs per approved AIP were implemented/completed

of school PPAs per approved AIP were implemented/complemeted

of school PPAs per approved AIP were implemented/completed

below of school PPAs per approved AIP were

and signed M&E tool to track and eva

6. Approved drat SIP/AIP incorporatin

1. At least one (1) accomplished an

1. At least one (1) accomplished an

1. Any one(1) of the following: Memo

Outstanding Utilized DepEd-framed and school-fra