Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nguyen Thi Minh Huyen 19145442
Nguyen Thi Minh Huyen 19145442
Nguyen Thi Minh Huyen 19145442
GRADUATION PAPER
HANOI, 2023
HANOI UNIVERSITY OF BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY
FACULTY OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES
GRADUATION PAPER
HANOI, 2023
CERTIFICATE OF ORIGINALITY
I, the undersigned, hereby certify my authority of the study project report
entitled “A Study on Difficulties in English Writing Skills Encountered by
The Second-Year English Majors at HUBT” submitted in partial fulfillment
of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of English Language. Except
for the indicated reference, no other person’s work has been used without due
acknowledgment in the text of the graduation paper.
Hanoi, 2023
Approved by
SUPERVISOR
i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
During the process of implementing this graduation paper, I have
received a great deal of help, guidance and encouragement from my teachers,
my family, and my friends.
Firstly, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Ms. Nguyen Thi
Phuong Anh, M.A - my supervisor for her assistance and guidance during this
challenging process. She has generously given me valuable suggestions,
advice, and comments on my study. I find that this paper cannot come to an
end without her enthusiastic support.
Secondly, I would like to sincerely thank all the teachers of the Faculty
of English Language Studies at Hanoi University of Business and Technology
(HUBT), who have thoughtfully trained me in the past four years.
My special thanks also go to my dear friends who willingly helped me
in carrying out the survey and made a great contribution to my topic by giving
ideas, comments, suggestions which are very useful for my research.
Finally, I would like to give my wholehearted thanks to my family who
has stood behind me throughout this entire process.
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CERTIFICATE OF ORIGINALITY i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS iii
ABSTRACT vi
LIST OF ABBREVIATION vii
LIST OF TABLES AND CHART viii
PART A: INTRODUCTION 1
1. Rationale of the study 1
2. Aims and objectives of the study 2
3. Research questions 2
4. Scope of the study 2
5. Design of the study 2
PART B: DEVELOPMENT 4
1. MATERIAL COLLECTION 4
1.1. Theoretical background 4
1.1.1. Overview of writing skills 4
1.1.2. Types of writing skills 5
1.1.3. The criteria of writing skills for the second-year English majored
students 7
1.1.4. Problems in English writing skills of the non-native learners 7
1.1.5. Strategies to improve English writing skills 10
1.2. Research Methodology 11
1.2.1. Survey questionnaire 11
1.2.2. Participants 11
1.2.3. Research setting 11
2. DATA ANALYSIS 12
2.1 The situation of the second-year English majors at HUBT in writing skills 12
iii
2.2. HUBT second-year English majors’ problems in Writing skills 14
2.3. Suggestions to improve English Writing skills 16
2.3.1. Doing peer review exercises 16
2.3.2. Using technology 17
3. RESULTS 18
3.1. The second-year English majors’ difficulties in learning English writing
skills 18
3.2. Suggestions to improve English writing skills 19
PART C: CONCLUSION 21
1. Recapitulation 21
2. Limitation of the study 21
3. Suggestions for further studies 22
iv
ABSTRACT
v
LIST OF ABBREVIATION
• Dr: Doctor
• P: page
• PC: peer-checking
vi
LIST OF TABLES AND CHART
vii
PART A: INTRODUCTION
Nowadays, writing plays a vital role in daily life. People write for
different purposes such as letters, academic purposes or obtaining necessary
information.
1
2. Aims and objectives of the study
The study aims to find out difficulties faced by the second-year English
majors at HUBT, which includes two following objectives:
3. Research questions
The study is about learning English writing skills for second-year students
in HUBT. Due to the limitation of time and reference materials, this study
cannot cover the whole issue of writing skills. It only focuses on exploring
difficulties faced by students in writing skills. Moreover, the study could not
touch all the students. It is only confined to second-year students in the
Faculty of English Language Studies at HUBT.
Part A: Introduction
This part shows the rationale of the study, aims of the study, research
questions, scope of the study, and design of the study, which are provided to
introduce and serve as a basis for the whole study.
2
Part B: Development
The next section is Data analysis which consists of two parts. Firstly,
some problems that HUBT English majors have to face in writing are shown.
Then comes the most important part of the thesis, which is the solutions to
improving English writing for the second-year English majors.
The last section is Results in which the answers to the two research
questions are presented.
Part C: Conclusion
This part contains a research summary, the limitations of the study, and
suggestions for further studies.
3
PART B: DEVELOPMENT
1. MATERIAL COLLECTION
Writing is one of the most important skills in English. Writing not only
improves an individual's writing skills and knowledge but also supports other
English main skills. Wen (2007, p.4) shows “writing is gradually becoming
an important issue nowadays in English.” According to Yakhontova (2003),
English academic writing is formal and useful. Writing serves various goals
for its population. He also indicates some important characteristics of
academic writing. They are “an important feature of academic written
discourse is a cautious manner of writing” and “English academic writing is a
tendency to choose more formal alternatives when selecting words of
different parts of speech”.
4
Feldman and Usoff (2001) also agree that students’ awareness of the
importance of writing have to be heightened. That is the ultimate goal and is
also the first step to helping students write more effectively. In short, the
authors mainly affirm the importance of writing which affects most EFL
learners to help them succeed.
Example: I was always afraid of the water, but I decided that swimming
was an important skills that I should learn. I also thought it would be good
exercise. What I didn’t realize was that learning to swim would also make me
a more confident person.
5
Descriptive: Descriptive writing is a style of writing which focuses on
describing a character, an event or a place in great detail. The author
visualizes what he sees, hears, tastes, and feels.
Rob van Tulder (2018) indicates that there are four levels of writing
skills including
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
6
Writing a publishable text, based on clear questions or hypotheses.
The sophistication of the product and its contents are key (all
phases get equal attention)
Level 4
7
complex and difficult to learn, not only the ability to use structures, but also
the concept of varied skills such as stylistic and mechanical skills. Stylistic
skills is the ability to manipulate sentences and use language effectively
whereas mechanical skills is the ability to correctly use those conventions
peculiar to the written language such as punctuation and spelling.
The students’ difficulties in writing English can be influenced by a lack
of vocabulary and grammar knowledge, as well as a lack of written exercises
and ideas. This is supported by Sulasti (2003), the problems most learners
face are how to write, what to be written, and lack of vocabulary as well as
incompetence in structures.
Writing is a very difficult skills for learners because writing consists of
morphemes, syntax, grammar structure and how to combine the words to
make correct sentences. According to Bryne (1988): Writing is the act of
forming letters or a combination of letters according to certain conventions to
form words and the words must be arranged into sentences. It is generally
agreed that writing is the most difficult skills to master for foreign language
learners.
Bryne (1988) divided the problems that make writing difficult into three
categories. The first is Linguistic Difficulty. Linguistics aspects such as
grammar, vocabulary, language use and structures in writing must be fully
monitored. The second is Physiology Difficulty, which focuses more on the
writers’ adversity since there is no direct interaction and feedback from the
readers during writing. This leads to difficulty in developing written materials
or contents of composition. The third is Cognitive Difficulty. Writing has to
be taught through formal instruction like spelling, punctuation, capitalization
and paragraphing.
A study by Nga and Uyen (2023) found that English majored students at
Tay Do are faced with many difficulties in English writing skills in terms of
8
vocabulary, grammar, and background knowledge. According to them,
students find it very confusing to choose words, which leads to using simpler
and less interesting words in the paragraph. Take these two sentences as
examples:
“Love you like a love song” is a song with a good melody and affection. (1)
“Love you like a love song” is a catchy melody song and full of love
lyrics. (2)
Compared to sentence (1) which is simply written and mediocre,
sentence (2) is more expressive and richer in word choice. However, many
students end up producing sentences similar to (1) as a result of lack of
vocabulary.
Besides, the study by Nga and Uyen (2023) indicates that the gap
between Vietnamese grammar and English grammar poses a tough challenge
for students who are not familiar with intricate details such as English tenses
and word order. The first grammatical challenge for many students is the
usage of tenses. Since Vietnamese grammar includes a few indicators like
"sẽ" (future), "đã" (past) or "đang" (present continuous), it is easy to express
the tenses of circumstances or events in Vietnamese. Meanwhile, to match the
same context in English, some tenses must be used alternatively within one or
two sentences, which is confusing to non-native writers. For students with a
lack of basic grammar knowledge, using tenses is one of the biggest obstacles
to their writing.
The results of Phuong’s study (2021) showed that students basically face
seven challenges in learning English writing: vocabulary (1), grammar (2),
prior knowledge (3), organizing ideas (4), time management (5), teacher’s
instruction (6) and the dependency on mother language (7).
A growing mass of research has offered valuable insights into the
significance of this skills for academic success. Many researchers have studied
9
students’ writing problems. In some research, the authors identified
undergraduate students’ word and sentence level mistakes in English writing.
Therefore, many researchers have found that writing in a second language poses
many problems for most of the English as a foreign language (EFL) learner.
After studying, the author based on the study of Phuong’s study (2021)
with seven difficulties in writing related to vocabulary (1), grammar (2), prior
knowledge (3), organizing ideas (4), time management (5), teacher’s
instruction (6) and the dependency on mother language (7) to explore the
HUBT second-year English majored students.
1.1.5. Strategies to improve English writing skills
Peer Review is an appropriate technique to improve students' writing
skills. Peer review techniques are prevalent and have been applied in different
contexts (Conde et al. 2017). Peer review is one of the techniques in teaching
writing. Peer review is an important activity in students' writing process to
respond to each other's writing. Using peer review technique is very helpful
for students to improve their Written work because this technique allows
students to learn more with their classmates by exchanging ideas.
Students’ writing ability can be improved by fostering their interest,
motivation, and enjoyment for writing, through technology (Graham & Perin,
2007).
The arrival of computers and other technological devices led to the rapid
development of teaching and learning methods. They make learning other
languages more convenient than ever. Technology helps the students to
express their ideas with more confidence and without any worries of
handwriting and spelling errors. This technique allows the learners to receive
instant feedback from their instructors and it also hones the learners’
vocabulary skills. The online discussion forums support communication
among the learners and with their teachers which can also improve their
10
speaking skills. The major advantage of this technique is that, upon writing on
the computer or other devices, immediate alert will be given to the
grammatical and spelling errors so that the learners can make corrections in
no time. With a rich technology, English language learners can become better
readers and writers of English (Ismail, Al-Awidi&Almekhlafi, 2012).
1.2. Research Methodology
To conduct the study, the author employed both Quantitative and
Qualitative research methods, via interviewing students and using an online
survey questionnaire. The data was then synthesized and evaluated to help
identify student problems and give suggestions for improving their writing
skills.
1.2.1. Survey questionnaire
A questionnaire is a research tool consisting of a series of questions to
collect information from respondents. The questionnaire includes 6 questions
to help the author collect information for two research questions presented in
the very first part of this paper. All questions where students can circle the
correct answer.
1.2.2. Participants
The data utilized in this research paper was gathered from a survey
carried out among 50 students who are second-year students of Faculty of
English Language Studies at HUBT in March 2023.
1.2.3. Research setting
The questionnaire was created and formatted via Google Form on the
Internet. The link was sent to the intended audience between March 15 and
March 30. The subjects of the study are 50 second-year English majors, who
are engaged in learning at HUBT. They were guided to complete a list of
survey questions and submit it to the author by March 30, and the information
gathered was synthesized and analyzed in the next section.
11
2. DATA ANALYSIS
2.1 The situation of the second-year English majors at HUBT in writing
skills
According to the Faculty of English Language Studies at HUBT, the
second-year English majors are to achieve English proficiency at level 3
(equivalent to level B1 in the CEFR framework) by the end of the course. To
meet the requirements of level B1, their writing must be connected and
coherent using basic linking words with a limited number of cohesive
devices. At students’ current level, they are supposed to be able to write
simple and complex sentences, short paragraphs of 100-150 words, some
formal and informal emails, and essays.
Sentences 100%
Emails 32%
Assignments 52%
Essays 24%
12
half of which (52%) via writing school assignments. Most participants (80%)
seek to practice with short paragraphs of 100-150 words. The formal and
informal emails account for 32% of their choice when it comes to writing
practice. Only one quarter (24%) of the participants practice writing longer
academic essays, due to its complications. To conclude, the most common
writing practices of second-year HUBT are sentences and paragraphs. A
possible implication from the results is the students’ unwillingness to try with
more complex types of writing, resulting from their lack of confidence and
writing skills. The subjects of the study are supposed to be capable of first-
year required skills such as rewriting the sentences, choosing the correct word
forms, using linking words, etc. However, as second-year English majors,
they are required to achieve a higher level in academic writing.
13
Table 2.2 displays different difficulties of HUBT second-year English
majors in writing English. As clearly seen from the table, Grammar and
Vocabulary pose the biggest challenge for the surveyed students, in which all
students encounter grammatical problems and most struggle with Vocabulary.
The others (organizing ideas, time management, teacher’s instruction,
dependency on mother language) make up smaller parts, from 4% to 40%,
with very few students having problems with teacher’s instruction (4%)
Grammar problems
Others 20%
It can be seen from Table 2.3 that second-year English majors at HUBT
are faced with many grammatical problems, including correct form of verbs in
different tenses, using articles, and others. Among these problems, distinguishing
articles is the biggest challenge to 80% of the participants. In fact, many students
face problems related to absence and misuse of articles in their writing. Absence
14
of articles occurs when an article is not used before a noun (concrete noun). For
example: Kiki and Toni saw a cat. The noun ‘cat’ must have an article ‘a’.
Misuse of articles occurs when an inappropriate article is put before a noun
(concrete noun). For example: They sat under the tree. Suddenly, they saw the
cat on the tree. The article ‘the’ before noun ‘tree’ is not suitable because it is
never mentioned in the previous part of the text.
The second biggest problem for students is choosing word form, which is
voted by more than half of the participants (62%). Regarding this, the wrong
forms of the parts of speech are used. ‘He gave it to his friend under the tree with
so careful’. The supposed adverb ‘with so careful’ is incorrectly used. The
correct sentence is ‘He gave it to his friend under the tree so carefully’. An
example of errors in singular and plural forms is ‘Iyan and Awan played football
two hour’. This sentence should be ‘Iyan and Awan played football two hours’.
The next adversity that nearly half of the participants (48%) encounter is
using correct verb tenses in English. Some shared that they were confused
between the future perfect continuous and the future perfect, between the simple
past tense and past perfect tense. Other students have problems with subject and
verb agreement of indefinite pronouns. They don’t know if they should use
‘have’ or ‘has’ in the example “Everybody have/has their own life”. In this case,
‘everybody’ is a singular pronoun, so ‘has’ is correct.
Vocabulary problems
15
Lack of vocabulary about topics like cultural life, society,
90%
education, environment, etc.
16
2.3. Suggestions to improve English Writing skills
In order to find out whether the target population has employed
particular ways to improve their writing skills, the last questions in the survey
questionnaire were designed. The results are presented in this part.
2.3.1. Doing peer review exercises
17
than a single instructor, and exposure to different approaches other students
have taken in responding to an assignment (Nunan, 2003).
2.3.2. Using technology
18
Here are some suggested useful websites that can help to identify
students’ grammatical errors: Grammarly, Error Correction Games, and
Virtual Writing Tutor grammar checker. It is advised that students use
grammar-check applications to improve their writing quality.
3. RESULTS
19
Reference for Languages (CEFR). It requires second-year English majors to
write an academic essay about different topics.
The survey shows that some of the students have indeed implemented
some strategies to overcome the difficulties in writing and improve this skills
effectively. Here are some other suggestions to further help students manage
time and utilize the development of modern technology to improve their
writing performance.
First of all, students are recommended to use the Peer Check technique
to prevent errors. Error prevention is the principal function of the Peer Check
technique. Peer Check involves two people (performer and peer) self-
checking in parallel, agreeing on the action of performing on the correct
component. This technique takes advantage of another fresh set of eyes, not
affected by the performer’s mindset. The peer, an individual familiar with the
activity, may see the setbacks and errors that the performer does not see.
20
and spelling errors as you write your posts. Utilizing technology in writing
can help you save time, widen your grammar knowledge and so on.
Last but not least, online resources and websites are effective tools to
check grammar mistakes, expand vocabulary as well as exchange experience
with other English learners/ native speakers. The advances of technology
open the door to more opportunities to exchange information and learn
foreign languages.
21
PART C: CONCLUSION
1. Recapitulation
Though having accomplished its goals, the study has some limitations.
First, due to the time limitation, the primary data for this study was collected
only via a survey questionnaire. Instead, the data should be analyzed using
22
participants’ real written tests so that the results are more reliable.
Additionally, a triangulation approach is required for this case study to cross-
check the findings by delving deeper into other points of view from a bigger
group of participants, using a three-dimensional data gathering technique such
as interviews, questionnaires, and classroom observations. Second, the size of
the participant group is quite small. It cannot be denied that the larger the
sample, the more precise the results. However, the writer hopes that this paper
will serve as a useful source for students who seek to improve their writing
skills.
23
REFERENCES
1
12. Saiful Bahri (2009), Difficulties In Writing In Vocabulary And Grammar Of
The Second Year Students Of Smpn I Selong East Lombok West Nusa
Tenggara In The School Year 2008/2009
13.Sulasti, Yenny. 2003. The Structure of The Paragraphs Written. Universitas
Bengkulu
14.Wen (2007). “Dual publication and academic inequality”, p4
15.Yakhontova (2003), “English Academic Writing for Students
and Researchers”
16.https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/images/231794-cambridge-english-
assessing-writing-performance-at-level-b1.pdf
17.https://prep.vn/blog/thang-diem-ielts-writing/
2
APPENDIX
QUESTIONNAIRE
How to learn Writing skills effectively?
3
Question 3: What kinds of grammar difficulties do you face in writing
skills?
B. Lack of idioms
4
1