Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GED117_group1
GED117_group1
Regarding Freud’s definition of the theories, NO, I do not agree with them. The first reason why is
because it isn’t a universal experience. Since Freud’s theory mainly focused on sexual desires, I find
it weird and repulsive. Second is that various families would have different ways of bringing up their
children. Some would have a different family dynamic than others. Fathers could be the main
caretaker or, in unfortunate circumstances, not be present at all. Mothers also have an important role
in the dynamic and the family structure.
Universality: Freud's theory suggests the Oedipus complex is a universal human experience. Critics
argue that this disregards cultural contexts. Oedipus's story might reflect specific anxieties in ancient
Greek society, not a fundamental human truth.
Focus on Sexuality: Some argue Freud overemphasizes the sexual aspect. Oedipus Rex explores
themes of fate, free will, and the search for knowledge. These can be central to understanding the
play without solely focusing on sexual desire.
Gender Bias: The theory is rooted in a patriarchal view where the father-son dynamic is dominant.
Feminist critics argue it neglects the mother's role and the impact of the entire family structure.
Determinism vs. Agency: The play portrays Oedipus as somewhat helpless against his fate. Some
critics see this as undermining his agency and responsibility for his actions.
4. As a group do you agree with those theories? Support your ideas with your arguments and
explain
Freud's Oedipus and Electra complexes, though conversation starters about the little ones' inner
world, are like childhood myths – fun to explore, but not entirely true. We disagree with them for
a few reasons. First, Freud focused on a specific culture, missing the rich tapestry of family
structures around the globe. Second, his theories are all about "who wants who," neglecting the
emotional jungle of feelings that grow between parents and kids. Third, they paint a picture of
families stuck in traditional roles, with dads as rivals and moms as prizes. This simply doesn't
reflect the reality of modern families. Finally, there's not a lot of hard evidence to back these
theories up. They're more like bedtime stories than scientific facts. Modern psychology offers a
more grown-up approach. We look at how kids learn relationship skills from those around them,
how early bonds with caregivers shape their emotional lives, and how families function as
interconnected systems, where everyone influences everyone else. These ideas give us a more
complete and culturally aware understanding of how kids develop in the complex world of
family.
Personally, I do not believe the definite meaning of these theories. In Oedipus Complex, I do not
believe that some boys desire their mothers, initially. Instead, I’d like to think that whatever the
feelings the boy is experiencing towards their mother, they cannot directly convey it to their
mother, instead, they convey it to other women. A boy’s first hand experience with women starts
with their mother, that I believe. While in Electra Complex, I do not believe that girls will always
have the desire of their father’s reproductive part. Instead, I believe that girls desire a male
reproductive part because it could represent power. The understand the idea of men being
superior because they have the single thing a woman cannot have. Girls understand that being
a man is being above women, but at the same time, I believe girls understand that power can be
gained in other ways other than having a male reproductive part.
I believe that the problems with these theories is that it creates a toxic and forbidden attachment
towards their mother and father. In these theories, boys create a toxic feeling towards their
father just because of their unwanted feelings for their mother. While girls create a sense of
desire for a male reproductive part to the point they will resent their mother for having one.