Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full download Microeconomics 2nd Edition Bernheim Solutions Manual all chapter 2024 pdf
Full download Microeconomics 2nd Edition Bernheim Solutions Manual all chapter 2024 pdf
Solutions Manual
Go to download the full and correct content document:
https://testbankfan.com/product/microeconomics-2nd-edition-bernheim-solutions-man
ual/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://testbankfan.com/product/microeconomics-2nd-edition-
bernheim-test-bank/
https://testbankfan.com/product/microeconomics-canadian-1st-
edition-bernheim-ii-solutions-manual/
https://testbankfan.com/product/microeconomics-canadian-1st-
edition-bernheim-test-bank/
https://testbankfan.com/product/microeconomics-2nd-edition-
goolsbee-solutions-manual/
Microeconomics 2nd Edition Karlan Solutions Manual
https://testbankfan.com/product/microeconomics-2nd-edition-
karlan-solutions-manual/
https://testbankfan.com/product/microeconomics-2nd-edition-
acemoglu-solutions-manual/
https://testbankfan.com/product/microeconomics-canadian-2nd-
edition-hubbard-solutions-manual/
https://testbankfan.com/product/microeconomics-canadian-2nd-
edition-krugman-solutions-manual/
https://testbankfan.com/product/principles-of-microeconomics-2nd-
edition-mateer-solutions-manual/
Chapter 15 – Market Interventions
Answer:
The deadweight loss created by taxation will be smaller if goods with more inelastic
demand are taxed. Although without empirical data we cannot determine whether
demand for luxury cars is more or less elastic than the demand for all cars, it is likely that
the demand for all cars will be less elastic, because there are fewer substitutes for cars as
a group. On the other hand, it is possible that luxury car buyers may be relatively
insensitive to price if these cars have unique features, but some years ago, a luxury tax
was imposed on high-ticket items such as luxury cars. Quantity demanded was found to
be very price sensitive.
2. How might tax incidence differ in the short and long run?
Answer:
In a market with free entry and exit, supply is generally more elastic in the long run due
to entry and exit. In addition, demand is likely to be more elastic in the long run as
consumers adapt to price changes. Tax incidence, therefore, is likely to be different in the
short run versus the long run, and both curves may be more elastic. Without more
information about the relative magnitude of the elasticities, it is not possible to specify
the exact direction of this change, although it is certainly likely that consumers will bear
more of the tax.
3. Suppose the government enacts a tax that requires each active firm in a market to
pay an annual fee of F dollars. What effect will this tax have in the short run? In
the long run?
Answer:
A tax that requires each firm to pay a flat annual fee would add to the fixed costs of each
company. Since variable (and marginal) costs remain the same and the number of firms
in the short run is fixed, in the short run, no changes to the market equilibrium occur.
In the long run, firms can move out of the market in response to a decrease in profits. The
increase in the fixed costs will move the average cost curve upward, increasing the
minimum average cost. In other words, the long-run supply curve will shift upward
sufficiently to offset the tax. Since some firms will exit, there will be fewer firms in the
new long-run equilibrium.
15-1
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in
any manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Chapter 15 – Market Interventions
4. Is there any benefit to a country (in terms of its domestic aggregate surplus) from
subsidizing firms that export to another country when the market in that other
country is perfectly competitive?
Answer:
No. Subsidizing exports to another country where markets are perfectly competitive
produces no benefit to the exporting country. When the government offers an export
subsidy, shippers will export the good up to the point where domestic price exceeds the
price in the importing country by the amount of the subsidy. In other words, the domestic
price of the good will increase by the amount of the subsidy. With the price increase,
producers gain, but consumers are hurt. Additionally, the government loses by expending
money on the subsidy, and the net result is a deadweight loss. Consumption and
production distortions will be created (by stimulating artificially high exports), so
aggregate surplus will decrease.
Answers to Problems
15.1 The market demand function for corn is Qd = 15 - 2P and the market supply
function is Qs = 5P -2.5, both measured in billions of bushels per year. Suppose
the government imposes a $2.10 tax per bushel. What will be the effects on
aggregate surplus, consumer surplus, and producer surplus? What will be the
deadweight loss created by the tax?
Answer:
Before the tax
Initial equilibrium price $2.50 per bushel
Initial equilibrium quantity 10 billion bushels
Initial equilibrium consumer surplus $25 billion
Initial equilibrium producer surplus $10 billion
Initial equilibrium aggregate surplus $35 billion
Explanation:
Step 1: Calculating initial market equilibrium without the tax.
15-2
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in
any manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Chapter 15 – Market Interventions
Qd = 0 when P = $7.50.
Qs = 0 when P = $0.50.
Step 2: Calculating new levels of consumer surplus (CS), producer surplus (PS), and
aggregate surplus (AS).
We computed the following values for consumer and producer surpluses and aggregate
surplus:
CS = $25 billion.
PS = $10 billion.
AS = $35 billion.
We first create the new supply function that includes the $2.10 tax per bushel. Rearrange
the supply curve so that price is on the left-hand side, and then add the tax to the right-
hand side. The demand function remains the same. Now we set the new supply function
equal to the demand function to compute the new equilibrium price. Buyers now pay $4
per bushel but sellers receive only $1.90 per bushel (the price paid by consumers less the
tax that sellers have to pay). Substituting $4 into the demand function, we get 7 billion
bushels traded at the new price.
Step 4: Calculating new levels of consumer surplus, producer surplus, and aggregate
surplus.
CS = $12.25 billion.
PS = $4.90 billion.
We can calculate deadweight loss (DWL) by comparing the initial aggregate surplus to
the new (after-tax) aggregate surplus: Calculating the area of the DWL triangle: DWL =
$3.15 billion.
15-3
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in
any manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Chapter 15 – Market Interventions
15.2 Compare your answers to Problem 1 and In-Text Exercise 15.1 (page 523) with
the answer to Worked-Out Problem 15.1 (page 522). In each case, what is the
ratio of the deadweight loss to tax revenue? What happens as the tax grows
larger?
Answer:
The ratio of the deadweight loss to tax revenue is:
Tax ($) Tax revenue ($) Deadweight loss Ratio of
($) deadweight loss
to tax revenue
Problem 15.1 2.10 14.70 3.15 0.214
In-Text Exercise 15.1 1.40 11.20 1.40 0.125
Worked-Out Problem 15.1 0.70 6.30 0.35 0.056
As the tax grows larger, the ratio of deadweight loss to tax revenue increases.
Explanation:
The ratio of the deadweight loss to tax revenue is provided in the table above. As the tax
increases, the lost aggregate surplus per dollar of tax collected also increases.
15.3 The market demand function for corn is Qd = 15 - 2P and the market supply
function is Qs = 5P -2.5, both measured in billions of bushels per year. Suppose that there
is a tax of $T per bushel. What are the prices buyers and sellers receive as a function of
the tax T? What are the government’s revenue, aggregate surplus, and the deadweight
loss as a function of T? What happens to the ratio of the deadweight loss divided by the
government’s tax revenue as T grows?
Answer:
As the tax rate increases, the price that buyers pay increases and the price that sellers
receive decreases. Equilibrium quantity decreases. The government's revenue increases.
Aggregate surplus decreases, and deadweight loss increases. As T rises, the ratio of the
deadweight loss divided by the government’s tax revenue will increase.
Explanation:
As the size of the tax increases, the price that buyers pay increases and the price that
sellers receive decreases. Equilibrium quantity decreases. The government's
revenue increases. Aggregate surplus decreases, and deadweight loss increases. As T
rises, the ratio of the deadweight loss divided by the government’s tax revenue will
increase, and as T falls, the ratio of deadweight loss divided by the government's tax
revenue falls. Thus taxes reduce social welfare relative to the size of benefits to
government more as the size of the tax increases, at least in a market with linear supply
and demand curves. This occurs because at higher prices, demand is more elastic, and
thus rising prices reduce quantity by a greater amount. Tax revenues do not rise as
rapidly, and deadweight loss increases faster.
15-4
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in
any manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Chapter 15 – Market Interventions
15.4 Consider again Worked-Out Problem 14.2. The daily demand for pizza is
Qd = 32,900 – 600P, where P is the price of pizza. The daily costs for a pizza
company include $845 in avoidable fixed costs and variable costs equal to
VC = 5Q + Q2 /80, where Q is the number of pizzas produced each day. Marginal
cost when producing Q pizzas is MC = 5 + Q/40. Recall that the price is $11.50,
and the total quantity demanded is 26,000 pizzas per day. In a long-run
equilibrium, each active firm produces 260 pizzas per day, its efficient scale. That
means there are 100 active firms in the initial long-run equilibrium.
Suppose that starting at the initial long-run equilibrium with a price of $11.50 and
100 active firms, the government requires firms to pay a tax of $11.50 per pizza.
What is the amount paid by buyers and received by sellers in the short run? What
is the government revenue? What is the deadweight loss? What about in the long
run?
Answer:
No tax With a tax = $11.50
Short-run equilibrium price 11.50 21.50
Short-run equilibrium quantity 26,000 20,000
Consumer surplus 562,000 333,300
Producer surplus 84,500 50,000
Aggregate surplus 647,400 383,300
Government revenue --- 230,000
Deadweight loss --- 34,490
In the long run, the equilibrium price will be $23 and the quantity will be 19,100.
Relative to the short-run equilibrium, deadweight loss increases.
Explanation:
In the long run, since firms are losing money at the short-run price, some firms will exit.
This will continue until firms just break even. Since the original efficient scale was at a
price of $11.50 and a quantity of 260, the new price will be equal to the old price plus the
tax, $11.50 + $11.50 = $23.00. At this price, the quantity demanded is 32,900 – 600(23)
= 19,100.
Since quantity falls more (as compared to the short-run equilibrium), deadweight loss
will increase.
15-5
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in
any manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Chapter 15 – Market Interventions
15.5 Use a graph to show that, when the government increases the tax on a good, the
sum of the change in consumer surplus plus the change in producer surplus plus
the change in government revenue equals the change in the deadweight loss.
Verify that this relationship holds by comparing the answers to Worked-Out
Problem 15.1 and In-Text Exercise 15.1 (pages 522 and 523).
Answer:
In Worked-Out Problem 15.1, the government imposed a $0.70 tax on the market for
corn, and in In-Text Exercise 15.1, the government imposed a $1.40 tax on the market for
corn. The graph below shows the market for corn with the $0.70 tax. With this tax, A =
$20.25, B = $6.30, C = $8.10, and D = $0.35.
Recall that the market demand function for corn is Qd = 15 - 2P and the market supply
function is Qs = 5P -2.5, both measured in billions of bushels per year. For the tax
increase to $1.40, the change in consumer surplus, producer surplus, and government
revenue, relative to the $0.70 tax is as follows:
15-6
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in
any manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Chapter 15 – Market Interventions
Explanation:
When the government increases the tax on a good, the sum of the change in consumer
surplus plus the change in producer surplus plus the change in government revenue
equals the change in the deadweight loss.
For In-Text Problem 15.1 (price rises to $3.50 and quantity falls to 8 billion): A = $16,
B = $11.20, C = $6.40, D = $1.40.
15.6 The market demand function for corn is Qd = 15 - 2P and the market supply
function is Qs = 5P -2.5, both measured in billions of bushels per year. The initial
equilibrium price is $2.50, and the initial equilibrium quantity is 10 billion
bushels. Consumer surplus is $25, producer surplus is $10, and aggregate
surplus is $35. Suppose the government gives corn farmers a subsidy of $0.70 per
bushel of corn. What will be the effects on aggregate surplus, consumer surplus,
and producer surplus? What will be the deadweight loss created by the subsidy?
Answer:
Amount ($)
New level of consumer surplus 30.25 billion
New level of producer surplus 12.1 billion
Cost of the subsidy to government 7.7 billion
New level of aggregate surplus 34.65 billion
Deadweight loss 0.35 billion
15-7
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in
any manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Chapter 15 – Market Interventions
Explanation:
In Problem 15.1, the equilibrium price, quantity, CS, and PS were calculated.
P = $2.50.
Q = 10 billion bushels.
CS = $25.00.
PS = $10.00.
AS = $35.00.
When the government imposes the $0.70 subsidy, the price to consumers decreases. Thus
the quantity increases, but since the CS gain is less than the cost of the subsidy, there is a
deadweight loss due to the additional units, as shown in the graph below.
With the subsidy, the market price will fall to $2.00. After receiving the subsidy, the
price that producers take home is $2.70. The new quantity will be 11.
Calculate deadweight loss (DWL) by comparing the initial aggregate surplus to the new
(after-subsidy) aggregate surplus (or simply by calculating the area of the triangle in the
graph). Change in DWL = $0.35 billion.
15-8
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in
any manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Chapter 15 – Market Interventions
15.7 The market demand function for corn is Qd = 15 - 2P and the market supply
function is Qs = 5P -2.5, both measured in billions of bushels per year. The initial
equilibrium price is $2.50, and the initial equilibrium quantity is 10 billion bushels.
Consumer surplus is $25, producer surplus is $10 and aggregate surplus is $35. Suppose
the government wants to raise the price of corn to $3. What are the welfare effects of a
price floor, price support, production quota, and voluntary production reduction program?
Answer:
A price floor:
Amount ($)
Consumer surplus 20.25 billion
Producer surplus 14.4 billion
Cost to the government 0 billion
Aggregate surplus 34.65 billion
Deadweight loss 0.35 billion
A price support:
Amount ($)
Consumer surplus 20.25 billion
Producer surplus 15.63 billion
Cost to the government 10.51 billion
Aggregate surplus 25.37 billion
Deadweight loss 9.63 billion
Production quota:
Amount ($)
Consumer surplus 20.25 billion
Producer surplus 14.4 billion
Cost to the government 0 billion
Aggregate surplus 34.65 billion
Deadweight loss 0.35 billion
Explanation:
In Problem 15.1, the equilibrium price, quantity, CS, and PS were calculated.
P = $2.50.
Q = 10 billion bushels.
15-9
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in
any manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Chapter 15 – Market Interventions
CS = $25.00.
PS = $10.00.
AS = $35.00.
15-10
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in
any manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Chapter 15 – Market Interventions
15.8 Suppose that the demand function for pizzas is Qd = 65,800 – 1,200P. The supply
function is Qs = 4,000P – 20,000. Suppose the pizza parlor industry is effective at
lobbying the government, which institutes a price floor of $15 on pizzas.
Assuming that the least-cost pizza producers are the ones to produce the
demanded pizzas, what is the effect on the aggregate, consumer, and producer
surpluses? What if instead the government raised the price to $15 using a price
support program?
Answer:
Consumer surplus will stay the same, producer surplus will stay the same, and
aggregate surplus will stay the same.
If the government raised the price to $15 using a price support program: Consumer
surplus will stay the same, producer surplus will stay the same, and aggregate surplus
will stay the same.
Explanation:
First solve for the initial equilibrium price with no interventions by equating market
demand and market supply:
In this case, the price floor of $15 is set below the equilibrium price of $16.50. The price
floor has no practical effect on consumer surplus, producer surplus, or aggregate surplus
because the government is mandating a minimum price that is below the existing market
price. Likewise, there would be no effect of a similar price support program.
15.9 Suppose that the MILC program described in Read More Online 15.6 had no
cap. The demand function described is Qd = 31.6 – 9.4P. The supply function is
Qs = 6.6 – 10.3P. The equilibrium price for the market without intervention is P =
$1.27, and the equilibrium quantity is Q = 19.7 billion gallons of milk. How much
would the government need to buy to raise the price of milk to $1.40 per gallon
under a price support program? What would be the effects on aggregate surplus,
consumer surplus, producer surplus, and government revenue.
Answer:
The government would need to buy 2.58 billion gallons of milk to raise the price of milk
to $1.40 per gallon under a price support program.
15-11
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in
any manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Chapter 15 – Market Interventions
Explanation:
The equilibrium price for the market without intervention is P = $1.27, and the
equilibrium quantity is Q = 19.67 billion gallons of milk.
The government will have to buy the difference between the quantity supplied and the
quantity demanded: 21.02 – 18.44 = 2.58 billion gallons.
15.10 Suppose that the demand function for pizzas is Qd = 65,800 – 1,200P. The supply
function is Qs = 4,000P – 20,000. Suppose the College Student Party is elected
and places a price ceiling on pizza of $10 per pizza. How many pizzas will be
bought and sold? Assuming that the consumers with the highest willingness to
pay are the ones to consume the supplied pizzas, what will the effect be on the
aggregate, consumer, and producer surpluses?
15-12
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in
any manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Chapter 15 – Market Interventions
Answer:
A total of 20,000 pizzas will be bought and sold
Assuming that the consumers with the highest willingness to pay are the ones to consume
the supplied pizzas: consumer surplus will increase, producer surplus will decrease, and
aggregate surplus will decrease.
Explanation:
Let’s first solve for the initial equilibrium price with no interventions. We equate market
demand and market supply to accomplish that:
At this price, 46,000 pizzas are bought and sold. With a price ceiling of $10, we compute
that:
Qs = 4,000(10) – 20,000.
Qd=65,800 – 1,200(10) = 53,800.
With a price ceiling in place, the quantity supplied will be smaller than the quantity
demanded, and thus only 20,000 pizzas will be sold (and bought) at the price ceiling of
$10. Consumer surplus will increase, since students who can buy pizzas get a lower price
(and we have assumed that the students who place the highest value on the pizzas get
them), producer surplus will decrease, since fewer pizzas are sold and the price is lower,
and aggregate surplus falls. There is a deadweight loss due to the price ceiling.
15.11 The market demand function for corn is Qd = 15 - 2P and the market supply
function is Qs = 5P - 2.5, both measured in billions of bushels per year. What would
be the welfare effects of a policy that put a cap of $2 per bushel on the price farmers can
charge for corn? (Assume that corn is purchased by the consumers who place the highest
value on it.)
Answer:
Amount ($)
New level of consumer surplus 27.19 billion
New level of producer surplus 5.63 billion
New level of aggregate surplus 32.81 billion
Deadweight loss 2.19 billion
Explanation:
The original equilibrium price is P = $2.50 per bushel and the equilibrium quantity is Q =
10 billion bushels. With a price ceiling of $2 we compute that:
15-13
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in
any manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Chapter 15 – Market Interventions
The quantity that will actually be sold in the market is the quantity supplied. The new
level of consumer surplus is $27.19 billion, and the new level of producer surplus
is $5.63 billion. The new level of aggregate surplus is $32.81 billion Thus, the
deadweight loss is $2.19 billion. The price ceiling increases consumer surplus at the
expense of producer surplus; this change is a transfer from producers to consumers. There
is a deadweight loss because some corn will no longer be sold after imposing the price
ceiling.
15.12 The market demand function for corn is Qd = 15 - 2P and the market supply
function is Qs = 5P - 2.5, both measured in billions of bushels per year. Suppose
the import supply curve is infinitely elastic at a price of $1.50 per bushel. What
would be the welfare effects of a tariff of $0.50 per bushel?
Answer:
Infinitely elastic at a price of $1.50 per bushel
Amount ($)
Consumer surplus 36 billion
Producer surplus 2.5 billion
Aggregate surplus 38.5 billion
Explanation:
With a world supply curve that is perfectly elastic at $1.50:
Consumer surplus is $36.00 billion, producer surplus is $2.50 billion, and aggregate
surplus is $38.50 billion.
15-14
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in
any manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Chapter 15 – Market Interventions
The new level of consumer surplus is $30.25 billion, and the new level of producer
surplus is $5.63 billion. Government revenue is $1.75 billion. The new level of aggregate
surplus is $37.63 billion. Thus, the deadweight loss is $0.88 billion.
15.13 Suppose the import supply curve for a good is infinitely elastic at the world price.
Draw a graph to show the welfare effect of a subsidy on imports.
Answer:
Explanation:
a. Change in consumer surplus: A + B + C + D + E.
15-15
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in
any manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Chapter 15 – Market Interventions
Consumers are better off because of the lower price of the import, but domestic producers
lose sales and the government loses revenue because of the cost of the subsidy. Since the
losses to producers and the government exceed the gains to consumers, there is a
deadweight loss.
15.14 Suppose the supply curve of imports is infinitely elastic at the world price. Using
a graph show how high a tariff the country must set to completely prevent imports
from coming into the country.
Answer:
To completely prevent imports from coming into a country, a tariff would need to be
equal to Pd - Pw.
Explanation:
When the price equals P*, there are no imports. The tariff needed is the difference
between the domestic equilibrium price (Pd) and the world price (Pw).
15-16
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in
any manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Chapter 15 – Market Interventions
15.15 The country of Widgetium is the only country in which consumers desire to
consume widgets. Suppose the domestic demand for widgets in Widgetium is
Qd = 20 – 2P and the domestic supply is Qs = 5P – 7.5 both measured in millions
of widgets. In addition, there is a perfectly inelastic supply of 2 million foreign
widgets. What tariff on widgets maximizes domestic aggregate surplus?
Answer:
A tariff of $3.64 on widgets maximizes domestic aggregate surplus.
Explanation:
To solve this problem, first find the world supply curve:
Set Qw = Qd.
At this price, domestic firms supply Q = 5(3.64) – 5.5 = 13 million widgets (rounded),
and foreign firms supply 2 million widgets, for a total of 15 million widgets. Since the
foreign supply is perfectly inelastic, the same amount will be supplied at any price. Thus
the optimal tariff simply transfers surplus from foreign producers to the government, and
is equal to the equilibrium price. A lower tariff would reduce revenue to the government,
and a higher tariff would reduce consumer purchases of widgets and create deadweight
loss. Thus, the optimal tariff is $3.64.
15.1 Suppose that the demand for a good is Qd = A – BP and the supply is QS = RP – S,
where A, B, R, and S are all positive numbers. Derive a function P*(T) describing
the equilibrium price as a function of the specific tax T the government places on
the good. What is the derivative of the equilibrium price with respect to T? (This
is known as the “pass-through rate” of the tax.) How does it depend on A, B, R,
and S?
Answer:
[R/(B + R)]T + [(A + S)/(B + R)] describes the equilibrium price as a function of
the specific tax T the government places on the good.
15-17
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in
any manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Chapter 15 – Market Interventions
The pass-through rate depends on R and B, the inverses of the slopes of the supply and
demand curves, respectively
Explanation:
The pass-through rate depends on R and B, the inverses of the slopes of the supply and
demand curves, respectively. B and R are part of the elasticity of demand and supply; in
general, the more inelastic curve will bear most of the tax. Thus, in general, the more
elastic demand is, the lower the pass-through rate, and relatively more of the tax will be
paid by firms. The more elastic supply is, all other things equal, the higher the pass-
through rate, and relatively more of the tax will be paid by consumers.
15.2 Suppose the government needs to raise 15 billion dollars of revenue with specific
taxes on corn and wheat. The demand and supply of corn (in billions of bushels
per year) are Qdcorn = 15 – 2Pcorn and Qscorn = 5Pcorn – 2.5. The demand and supply
of wheat (also in billions of bushels per year) are Qdwheat = 2 – (1/2)Pwheat and
Qswheat = (2/3)Pwheat – 1. What taxes on corn and wheat raise this revenue with the
smallest total deadweight loss (or equivalently, the greatest aggregate surplus)?
15.3 Suppose that the domestic demand for widgets in a country is Qd = 100 – P, the
domestic supply is Qsdom = 2P and the foreign supply is Qsforeign = 2P. Derive an
expression for the domestic aggregate surplus as a function of the tariff rate T
chosen by the government. Show that the tariff rate that maximizes domestic
aggregate surplus is strictly positive.
15.4 [Note: this question requires concepts from Chapters 5 and 6.] Suppose that
each consumer consumes goods X and Y with preferences represented by the
utility function:
15-18
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in
any manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Chapter 15 – Market Interventions
Each consumer has income of $150. The supply curve for good X is horizontal
(perfectly elastic) at a price of $1, while the supply curve of good Y is horizontal
at a price of $2.
a. With no tax, what are the competitive equilibrium prices of goods X and Y?
How much of each good does each consumer purchase?
b. The government has put a specific tax of $1 on purchases of good X. What are
the competitive equilibrium prices of good X and Y with the tax? How much of
each good does each consumer now purchase?
c. Suppose the government decides to give each consumer an income subsidy
(increasing his income above $150) so that he is exactly as well off after the tax as
before the tax. Will the government’s tax revenue exceed the amount of the
subsidy?
Answer:
a. With no tax, the competitive equilibrium price of X is $ 1 and the competitive
equilibrium price of Y is $2. Each consumer will buy 50 units of X and 50 units of Y.
c. It will cost $30 to restore the consumer to the original level of utility. With this level of
income, the consumer will buy 18 units of X and 72 units of Y. Thus, the government will
collect $18 in tax revenue, which is the cost of the income subsidy.
Explanation:
a. Since the supply curves are perfectly elastic, the competitive equilibrium prices of each
good come directly from the supply curves. Each consumer maximizes U(X,Y) subject to
150 = X + 2Y. The Lagrange equation is thus L = +2 + λ(150 - X - 2Y).
Differentiating with respect to X and Y gives the first-order condition, X=Y.
Substituting into the budget constraint gives the optimal quantities, X* = 50, Y* = 50.
Thus, at the competitive equilibrium prices of Px = $1 and Py = $2, each consumer will
purchase 50 units of each good.
b. Since the supply curve for X is horizontal (perfectly elastic), the entire tax is passed on
to consumers. Thus the new competitive equilibrium price of X is $2. Solving the
consumer's maximization problem again (as above) gives the new first-order condition Y
= 4X, and thus X* = 15, Y* = 60.
c. U(50,50) = 3√50, the original level of utility from the bundle in a. To achieve this
utility at the new price ratio requires a bundle of 18X and 72Y. (This is found by using the
first-order condition from part b., Y = 4X, and substituting that relationship into the
utility function. At new prices, this will cost $180, and thus it will cost the government
$30. Tax revenue (given the income subsidy) = $1(18) = $18, which is less than the cost
of the subsidy.
15-19
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in
any manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Chapter 15 – Market Interventions
15.5 [Note: this question requires concepts from Chapters 8 and 9.]
Answer:
a. Competitive price = $32
Market quantity = 1,200
Number of active firms = 100
Explanation:
a. Perfect competition implies that P = MC at the profit-maximizing point. To find the
long-run price, set MC = AC:
Firm quantity is 12, and price is $32. Substitute into the demand curve to get the
equilibrium quantity: Q = 1,200. Since each firm will produce 12 units, there will be 100
firms.
15-20
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in
any manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
que en aquella ribera deleitosa
de Nemoroso fue tan celebrada;
porque de todo aquesto y cada cosa
estaba Nise ya tan informada,
que llorando el pastor, mil veces ella 255
se enterneció escuchando su querella.
Y porque aqueste lamentable cuento,
no solo entre las selvas se contase,
mas, dentro de las ondas, sentimiento
con la noticia de esto se mostrase, 260
quiso que de su tela el argumento
la bella ninfa muerta señalase,
y así se publicase de uno en uno
por el húmido reino de Netuno.
Destas historias tales variadas 265
eran las telas de las cuatro hermanas,
las cuales, con colores matizadas
y claras luces de las sombras vanas,
mostraban a los ojos relevadas
las cosas y figuras que eran llanas; 270
tanto que, al parecer, el cuerpo vano
pudiera ser tomado con la mano.[244]
Los rayos ya del sol se trastornaban,[245]
escondiendo su luz, al mundo cara,
tras altos montes, y a la luna daban 275
lugar para mostrar su blanca cara;
los peces a menudo ya saltaban,
con la cola azotando el agua clara,
cuando las ninfas, la labor dejando,
hacia el agua se fueron paseando. 280
En las templadas ondas ya metidos
tenían los pies, y reclinar querían
los blancos cuerpos, cuando sus oídos
fueron de dos zampoñas que tañían
suave y dulcemente, detenidos; 285
tanto, que sin mudarse las oían,
y al son de las zampoñas escuchaban
dos pastores, a veces, que cantaban.
Más claro cada vez el son se oía
de dos pastores, que venían cantando 290
tras el ganado, que también venía
por aquel verde soto caminando,
y a la majada, ya pasado el día,
recogido llevaban, alegrando
las verdes selvas con el son suave, 295
haciendo su trabajo menos grave.
Tirreno destos dos el uno era,
Alcino el otro, entrambos estimados,
y sobre cuantos pacen la ribera
del Tajo, con sus vacas, enseñados; 300
mancebos de una edad, de una manera
a cantar juntamente aparejados,
y a responder. Aquesto van diciendo,
cantando el uno, el otro respondiendo.
TIRRENO
ALCINO
TIRRENO
ALCINO
TIRRENO
ALCINO
TIRRENO
ALCINO