Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Meskel Square Parking Construction Project Process Evaluation Questionnaire

Title of Questionnaire: Meskel Square Parking Construction Project Process Evaluation


Date of Questionnaire: April 24, 2024
Name of Organization/Researcher: Addis Ababa Mega Projects Construction Office
Contact Information: Team member
Section 2: Introduction
Purpose:
Thank you for participating in this evaluation of the Meskel Square Parking Construction Project
process. This questionnaire aims to gather feedback from key stakeholders involved in the
project, including representatives from the Addis Ababa Mega Projects Construction Office
(Client), BKW (Consultant), and CCCC (Contractor).
The information collected will be used to:
Assess the effectiveness of the project management processes employed.
Identify challenges and areas for improvement in project implementation.
Evaluate the contractor's performance against the contract requirements.
Recommend best practices and areas for improvement for future projects.
Instructions:
Please answer all questions to the best of your ability. The questionnaire is designed to be
completed anonymously.
 For closed-ended questions: Choose the answer that best reflects your experience.
 For open-ended questions: Please provide detailed and specific responses.
Confidentiality:
Your responses will be kept strictly confidential. No individual or company will be identifiable in
the final report.
Section 1: General Information
1.1. Role/Position:

 Client Representative

 Contractor

 Consultant
 Local Business Owner

 Other (please specify): _____________


1.2. Years of Experience in Construction/Related Field:

 Less than 1 year

 1-5 years

 6-10 years

 More than 10 years


Section 2: Project Objectives and Scope
2.1. To what extent do you believe the project objectives were achieved?

 Fully Achieved

 Partially Achieved

 Not Achieved
2.2. Please provide comments on the specific project objectives and scope. Were there aspects
that stood out positively or negatively?
Section 3: Part 1: Project Management Process (Adequacy and Effectiveness)
Instructions: Rate your level of agreement with the following statements using a Likert scale (1 =
Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree).

Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly


Statement Disagree (1) (2) (3) (4) Agree (5)

The project goals and objectives were clearly


defined and communicated to all stakeholders.

Effective communication channels were


established and maintained throughout the project
lifecycle.

Risk management processes were implemented


effectively to identify and mitigate potential risks.
Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly
Statement Disagree (1) (2) (3) (4) Agree (5)

Project schedules and budgets were realistic and


adhered to throughout the project.

Change management procedures were clear and


facilitated smooth adaptation to changes.

Effective problem-solving mechanisms were in


place to address issues arising during
construction.

Part 2: Project Implementation Challenges


Instructions: Please select all challenges that you encountered during the project implementation
process (choose all that apply). You can also elaborate on any specific challenges in the space
provided.
 Delays in material procurement
 Permitting and approval issues
 Communication breakdowns between stakeholders
 Workforce skill gaps or shortages
 Budgetary constraints
 Unforeseen technical difficulties
 Other (please specify):

Part 3: Contractor Performance Evaluation


Instructions: Rate your level of agreement with the following statements using a Likert scale
(1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree).

Strongly
Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly
Statement (1) (2) (3) (4) Agree (5)

CCCC adhered to the technical


specifications outlined in the
contract.
Strongly
Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly
Statement (1) (2) (3) (4) Agree (5)

The contractor maintained a


qualified and competent
workforce throughout the project.

CCCC effectively managed their


resources (materials, equipment,
manpower) to meet project
deadlines.

The contractor addressed quality


concerns promptly and
effectively.

CCCC proactively communicated


project progress and potential
issues to the client and
consultant.

Section 4: Recommendations for Future Projects


Instructions: Please share any recommendations you may have for improving the project
management process, contractor selection, or overall project implementation for future projects
undertaken by the Addis Ababa Mega Projects Construction Office.

4.1. Which recommendations for future projects do you find most critical?

 Enhance contingency planning

 Improve communication with local businesses

 Consider phased construction approaches

 Implement robust monitoring and evaluation systems

 Other (please specify): _____________


Section 5: Additional Comments
5.1. Do you have any additional comments or suggestions regarding the Meskel Square Parking
and Street Beautification Project or the evaluation process?

Section 6: Closing
Thank you again for your valuable time and participation in this evaluation. Your feedback is
crucial in ensuring the continued success of future projects undertaken by the Addis Ababa Mega
Projects Construction Office.
Please submit your completed questionnaire by [Date] to [Email Address] (Optional: You can
also include a link to an online survey tool if applicable).

You might also like