http://www.theresourcebasedeconomy.

com/2011/06/will-a-resource-based-economy-work/

Will a Resource Based Economy Work? theresourcebasedeconomy.com

There has been a longer discussion recently in this article whether a resource based economy will work or
not. And the opposer’s argument was largely centered around a notion that in RBE there will be no
contracts, that people can just walk away from their ‘job’, and that this will lead to a lack of mining ‘ore’.
That we won’t find people to work in the mines to dig up minerals needed for our ‘social production’ as he
calls it, to produce our cell phones and laptops, etc.

Of course, he does have a point. But not only in regards to mining ore, but in regards to the operation of the
whole planet. I understand his concern as I have it myself. The complexity of the world we have today is
extremely vast when it comes to the production of goods and services. Of course, mining of ore to extract
minerals, is one of the aspects of this complexity. We have a huge production of different products that
need everything from aluminum to plastics to glass to silicon to mention but a tiny percentage of the whole.
And all of these minerals and raw materials are processed in a lot of different places and manufactured into
a huge amount of different products. And this goes on on thousands of locations all over the planet.

All of the ‘alternative solutions’ to the problems we have in the world today deal with solutions
within the monetary system.

All of the ‘alternative solutions’ to the problems we have in the world today deal with solutions within the
monetary system. We have ‘recycling’, ‘carbon shares’, ‘cradle to cradle’, ‘environmental protection’, and
so forth. All of these deals with the industry and the monetary system staying as it is. ‘Recycling’ means
that we have to recycle the minerals and raw materials used in many of our products. ‘Carbon shares’ is a
‘monetary way’ for the society to be able to continue to pollute the environment, but it will cost a bit more for
the polluter. ‘Cradle to cradle’ means that industries produce everything with the termination and recycling
of the product in mind, not using any harmful agents in the product. ‘Environmental protection’ is the total of
all measures taken in regards to protect the environment, but still within the monetary system.

All of these measures assume that the monetary system, the industry, the free market and so forth stay
largely as it is. With recycling, cradle to cradle and carbon shares thinking, we still think in terms
of continuous consumption and unlimited economic growth.

It is understandable that the majority of people can not think in terms of changing the whole system, from
the root and up, because it is very difficult to think that far ‘out of the box’.

We have all become used to our way of life, with tonnes and tonnes of different products in thousands of
different categories. And we all think that this has to go on. We all think that we need hundreds of different
producers of cell phones, lap tops, cars, mattresses, guitars, etc. etc.

Yes, we, humans are an industrious race. We have ideas, we produce, we manufacture, we consume, and
we do it all over again. This is who we are. Isn’t it? Humans have proven to be full of ideas and ingenious
solutions to many of the problems of being human. We are also very good at creating problems for
ourselves, so that we can have yet more to solve. We constantly do this, and it seems to be human nature.
And we all wan’t to be free. Free to do what we want, travel where we want, think and say what we want,
work with what we want and live wherever we want. Of course, this kind of freedom is limited to only a few
in our world today.

My point and question is; How can/will a resource based economy work on a global scale, without it
becoming a ‘totalitarian’ system? For sure, none of us want’s any ‘global machine government’, even
though
Page 1 of 10that is what Jacque Fresco of The Venus Project proposes. We all want’s to beJulable to make
07, 2016 our MDT
12:22:43AM
http://www.theresourcebasedeconomy.com/2011/06/will-a-resource-based-economy-work/
though that is what Jacque Fresco of The Venus Project proposes. We all want’s to be able to make our
own decisions. So, how can it work, then? We are all so indoctrinated into thinking that if there’s no
‘penalty’ in terms of ‘job loss’, ‘money loss’, ‘property loss’ and so forth, we can’t get people to do what is
needed in society.

We think that if everyone will be able to ‘do whatever they want to do’, then we will lack a whole lot of
people to ‘dig ore’ as our commenter puts it. No one will take on a dangerous job like going into the mines
and dig out the urgently needed minerals to produce our cell phones, because when he/she get’s
everything he/she needs, he/she could simply walk away whenever he/she want’s. Since there wouldn’t be
any binding contract (in terms of money/property/job loss) in a resource based economy, the whole of
society would simply collaps.

Trust me, I truly, really and utterly understand this concern and this disbelief in a resource based economy.

The first time I heard about RBE, I immediately got a feeling that ‘this is good’, but at the same time, I
couldn’t get it to work in my intellectual analyzing mind. And that’s why I started this blog. I felt strongly that
RBE is possible, and not only possible, but the best alternative humanity has ever been able to choose. But
I couldn’t prove it. Because I too was totally indoctrinated in my mind in regards to thinking about money
and property as givens. As something that’s always been there, like air. It has taken me a couple of years
to ‘dedoctrinate’ myself into seeing how RBE can be possible.

So, back to our question. If we have no money or need for money, and everything is provided for everyone,
what will make people ‘work in the mines’ and do all the ‘dirty work’ needed in our society? It is a very good
question, and I am not sure that I can give a 100% answer to that. Because I don’t know. I can only
speculate and imagine, which I have done for a couple of years. And my answer goes like this:

Firstly, we have to think of RBE as a totally and utterly different society.

Firstly, we have to think of RBE as a totally and utterly different society. We can not think of an RBE society
with our ‘monetary goggles’. We have to take them off. We have to be able to imagine that the individuals
on this planet can actually shift their way of thinking from a ‘penalty based’ society to a ‘freedom of
contribution’ society where we do what we do because we want to contribute to society in meaningful ways.
Many people think this way already and refuse to take jobs ‘just to earn money’ but do what they do
because of their conviction in a different society. They have an inherent need to do something meaningful
that truly contributes to this world. Thinking that there has to be a ‘monetary penalty’ lurking in the
background to get people to do what is really needed in society is seeing this with the old ‘monetary
goggles’.

The truth is that the monetary reward is over rated in terms of production efficiency. There have numerous
studies that support this. Take a look at Dan Pink’s TED Talk about this phenomena and the animation
made from it. What is shows is that higher incentives leads to worse performance. It sounds like a self
contradictory statement, but when you think about it and see the background, it is not. And these results
have been replicated over and over again by psychiatrists, sociologists and economists. For simple,
straight forward tasks, ‘if you do this, then you get that’, monetary incentives are great. But when a task
get’s more complicated, when it requires some more conceptual thinking, the monetary incentives don’t
work.

What the research continues to show is that money is a motivator only when it gets people to take on a job.
After getting the job, there are other factors that leads to better performance and personal satisfaction, and
they are; Autonomy, mastery and purpose. Money only plays a part if the job doesn’t pay good enough for
people
Page 2 of 10to make a living. As soon as people are paid enough, then these other factors are the2016
Jul 07, important
12:22:43AM MDT
 they are; Autonomy, mastery and purpose. Money only plays a part
http://www.theresourcebasedeconomy.com/2011/06/will-a-resource-based-economy-work/ if the job doesn’t pay good enough for
people to make a living. As soon as people are paid enough, then these other factors are the important
ones.

What this shows is that the true values within humans are not ‘penalty centered’, but rather centered
around our previous notion of ‘freedom of contribution’. Autonomy is a vital value. People want’s to feel that
they have a freedom to choose what they do and how they do it. Mastery is an equally important value. To
have enough education and experience to really feel that one masters and succeeds in resolving the tasks
at hand. And last, but not least: purpose. We all have to feel a sense of purpose in what we do. It has to be
meaningful. In other words, money, and the threat of a ‘monetary penalty’ is not the reasons why people do
stuff.

This shows to prove that people actually might be ‘digging ore’ if there is a sense of autonomy, mastery
and purpose in the job.

Then we come to the point where we have to take off the ‘monetary goggles’ and put on the ‘RBE goggles’
instead. When we have this totally brand new world and way of thinking, there would be so many things
that would be different. Since people doesn’t have to take a job because of money anymore, what would
people do? Why would they do anything? Well, the former section should give the answer. People would
seek meaningful and purposeful tasks. We would seek tasks where we feel a sense of autonomy and
mastery. I think we also can add several reasons why people would do stuff that the mentioned research
doesn’t show. Like excitement, interest and fulfillment.

So, meaning, purpose, mastery, autonomy, excitement, interest and fulfillment are what really drives
people, and what will drive people in a resource based economy.

Now, back to ‘digging ore’. If this activity brings any of the above mentioned elements, people will do it.
But, when we have a resource based economy, where most people have waken up from the continuous
consumption cycle and where most people want’s to contribute to the betterment of society, things like
‘digging ore’ will not be as needed as before. Why? Because of several things. With the new mindset of
humanity, consumption will go drastically down. Not so much new minerals and raw materials has to be
dug up. Production will go down too, as products will be made to last and instead of postponing the release
of new technology to maximize profit, the newest technology can be released right away, thus saving
millions of tonnes of raw material that other wise would have been used in the never ending ‘new products’.
And lastly, technology that ‘digs ore’ will be developed, minimizing the need for human personell way down
in the mines.

To see how a resource based economy can work, we can divide it into 4 categories:

1. The human values has changed, or rather, has become acknowledged.

2. Technology has become more and more developed, removing the need for humans doing dangerous
and repetitive tasks.

3. As a result of RBE, society as a whole has changed drastically.

4. The notion of ‘property’ and ‘ownership’ has changed.

Contents [hide]

Page 3 of 10 Jul 07, 2016 12:22:43AM MDT

http://www.theresourcebasedeconomy.com/2011/06/will-a-resource-based-economy-work/

1 Human Values
2 Technology
3 Society
4 Property and ownership
5 Conclusion
6 Share this:
7 Related

Human Values

The most important first step for RBE to work is the human values.

The most important first step for RBE to work is the human values. As we see, people are intrinsically
motivated by other things than money, like a sense of purpose and meaning. It is only today’s need for
money that locks people into a ‘mind prison’ thinking that money is what motivates them, when it really is
not.

So this is about education and awakening. For RBE not to be a totalitarian, global, machine based
government, which non of us want, people have to wake up one by one into the truth of their own
motivation. We, as individuals have to train ourselves and each other into thinking of ‘why we are here’ and
‘what we really want to do’, not in terms of money, but in terms of what we feel as our true purpose here on
the planet.

I am training myself everyday to think this way. And the way I do it is to tell my self that every thing I do, I do
of service to the planet and humanity, service to others, and service to my self. Service to my self in terms
of what I want to do here on earth. And, I have already had the epiphany that being of service to others can
be extremely fulfilling for my self. Thus, doing what I do the very best way I can do it, is a fulfilling thing. And
this has nothing to do with money. What is funny, though, is that since I started thinking like this, I have had
more to do in my business than ever before, which of course brings in much more money than ever before
as well….

Of course, we can say that money is a means of gratitude, a ‘flow of appreciation’, going from one person
to another. I am not opposed to that way of thinking. Far from it. It is just that money and property and the
whole management of the whole planet has been so thoroughly fucked up by the ‘money logic’, that trying
to think of a world totally without money and property would do us all very good. It certainly does me good.
And I realize that as soon as I start to think in terms of money, I immediately get that old stressful feeling
again. It is me not thinking about money but at my purpose of being of service that brings the money in!
Because when I think that I don’t need money, I become relaxed, and the ‘law of attraction’ works in my
favor.

And then, my friends, what would be the logical consequence of this? Well, if all of us started thinking of
our purpose, rather than money, and doing things out of purpose rather than money…….we wouldn’t need
any money! When our purpose is to be of service, to give and share, then everyone will always have
enough of everything ever needed. And low and behold, we would actually live purpose- and meaningful
lives. Every one of us. No need to stress for more money, paying bills, pay taxes, take up loans, do
accounting, pay insurance, and what have you.

For a resource based economy to work, more and more people on the planet have to wake up to this
reality. It is a human choice that we have to do as individuals. There are already a whole lot of volunteers
around the world working for non-profit volunteer organizations. So the notion is not new. The question is
whether
Page 4 of 10 it will spread to the rest of society as well. But that a whole world could ‘work for free’
Jul 07, for12:22:43AM
2016 each MDT
http://www.theresourcebasedeconomy.com/2011/06/will-a-resource-based-economy-work/
whether it will spread to the rest of society as well. But that a whole world could ‘work for free’ for each
other should be totally possible. At least when enough (critical mass) people realize the benefits of doing
this, rather than toiling with money and all that it entails.

Technology

When the new value system is in place, when enough people realize the above mentioned, both people
who now are in ‘normal jobs’, but also those who are in politics and those who run large corporations, the
abandonment of money will be a reality. Then, with the profit motive gone, technology can be developed
without the hindrances that patents and greed used to be for unlimited development.

When we can concentrate on developing the best technology for everyone in every circumstance, and we
can truly let technology replace 99% of today’s jobs. Jobs that now are ‘kept open’, since replacing them
with technology would be devastating for the economy. Today, millions of people still work in factories
doning work that easily could have been replaced by machines, robots and technology. There are already a
whole lot of machines and technology in place, but again and again, I see people ‘closing the lid’ on
cardboard boxes and other meaningless repetitive tasks easily replaceable by technology.

And back to the ‘ore digging’ metaphor. I am pretty sure that this field is also one where technology and
machines could do much more work then it does today, replacing the need for human personell in mines.
Besides, when we truly make products to last, and human values have changed, we won’t consume as
much, and we will be able to recycle 100% of all ‘waste’, maybe extracting enough of what raw materials
we need, not needing to dig much more holes in the planet. In other words, technology teamed with the
new human values, will make the need for constantly new stuff much much less, and thus the need to
constantly dig up new resources.

And to me, being a part of a world where we all try to maximise human and environmental potential and
protection, rather than profit, and where we work to develop technology to serve these ends is very
interesting and fulfilling.

It would also be a true investment in humanity and the planet. An investment where we strive to take care
of the environment, build up the soil, educate all humans and build a sustainable world. A world we all can
truly enjoy for the rest of our lives and for all coming generations.

Society

Now, with the human values and the new focus on technology in place, society will change drastically. We
all work to fulfill our purpose in life, for our own and others betterment, to master new skills, to share our
knowledge and experience and to have exiting and meaningful ‘work’. In a society with no money or
property we can all truly care about each other with no ‘secret agenda’.

All humans will be educated to serve other humans and the planet itself. The population will
automatically stabilize when everyone understands that every person can not have more then one child in
his/her lifetime, meaning maximum two children per family. When this is followed we will have a ‘one birth
per one death’, securing a stable population on the planet. And this is made by individual choice, not by
force. By choice, because people now are educated to see the whole picture, and their own place in it.

What
Page 5 of 10 used to be companies and corporations will transform to be hubs of knowledge
Jul 07, within
2016 12:22:43AM MDT
http://www.theresourcebasedeconomy.com/2011/06/will-a-resource-based-economy-work/
What used to be companies and corporations will transform to be hubs of knowledge within
their respective fields.

What used to be companies and corporations will transform to be hubs of knowledge within their respective
fields. There can still be ’employees’, but they won’t be there because they need to collect a pay check.
They will be there because it is their field of interest and of expertise, because they want to be there. To
participate and collaborate. People can still start ‘businesses’, but not for monetary gain, but to work
together on new solutions to old or new problems, to create works of art, to draw new buildings, develop
new transportation or new types of energy, new medicines or what have you. It will be a purpose driven
world, rather than a profit driven one. It will be a world where human potential is maximized in all aspects.

So then, what would the ‘ore miners’ do? Maybe some of them have been working in the mine for years
and years and know nothing else. Maybe these would want to continue doing what they do, but maybe a
little less. Maybe take a long vacation, or only work a couple of days a week. Maybe this leads to
a deficiency of Coltan for a while, but so what? So what if we don’t get the new iPhone 5 this fall. So what if
we don’t get the newest flat screen 52 inches LED powered Full HD TV this christmas. So what!?

The only ‘thing’ in this world that ‘needs’ this is the never satisfied, always craving, always consuming,
never stopping Monetary System that needs cyclical consumption, planned obsolescence and endless
waste to exist. But WE don’t need that. We are not ‘consumers’, it is this system that has made people this
way. It is this system that needs us to constantly consume and crave more and more and more, and no
wonder, cause if we don’t, the whole system will collaps. Just like that. If we stop buying our cell phones,
our cars, our flat screens, our new jeans, our jewelry, our what have you, there will be no more monetary
system. So, that’s why we need an alternative ASAP. And here we are, discussing RBE.

Back to the ‘ore miners’. Some other of the ore miners might have thought of smarter ways to do things,
might have ideas to ease the process of getting up that ore. But, he can’t tell anyone about it, because if he
does, he might loose his job. Because his idea is for a machine that can DO his job. But now, in the new
resource based economy, that is exactly what he can do. Of course, the mining company doesn’t need to
earn money any more either, so they might also relax a bit, digging that ore.

They have now become a part of a global cooperation of former mining companies, working together in
coordinating what is really needed of mined minerals in the world. And the former ore miner workers idea to
a new machine that can replace the humans needed down in the mine is welcomed with open arms. He
becomes a part of the new global mining cooperation, working together with researchers, scientists
and environmentalists on how to provide what is now needed of new minerals in a most planet friendly way.

Some of the other miners also want’s to be a part of this and becomes a part of the global team. Then
again, other miners might grab the opportunity to do something completely different. One of them had
always had an interest for sociology, but never go to study it. He goes of to university. The university that is
now open for everyone. And the learning is now strongly aided by new technology, facilitating the possibility
for many more people to learn than ever before. Another one had wanted to travel the world. Off she goes,
being able to go anywhere she wants for as long as she wants. She learns a lot on her trip, and want’s to
study anthropology to understand indigenous people better, and how they can contribute to the world. A
third one had several inventive ideas for improving and cleaning contaminated water. He quickly finds other
people within these fields where his ideas becomes picked up, improved, tested and used in the real world,
improving water everywhere it is needed.

All former patents are now made public, for everyone to study and contribute to. All secrets ever held by
governments are let out in the open. All borders are opened and totally free travel by every one made

possible.
Page 6 of 10 New efficient, environmentally friendly, energy independent and healthy transportation, housing MDT
Jul 07, 2016 12:22:43AM
http://www.theresourcebasedeconomy.com/2011/06/will-a-resource-based-economy-work/
possible. New efficient, environmentally friendly, energy independent and healthy transportation, housing
and cities are built all over the planet. And everyone can live anywhere they want, according to their own
interest and need. Everyone can contribute in the fields that interest them the most. Everyone can educate
themselves in new fields at any time. The world has become 100% efficient in terms of human satisfaction
and development. The question is, ‘what do you want to do?’. Not in terms of money, but in terms of what is
needed on the planet at any time and what the individual feel is fulfilling to spend his or her days on.

There is a natural coordination in this. When a beach is full, one goes somewhere else. When a field is full,
when an area is full, when there is no need, one finds something else to do, elsewhere. And there will
always be needs that needs to be met. And we meet them in our full ability. If it is too much, we say so and
get more help. We all collaborate in this world.

Humanity has discovered it’s true purpose here on earth. It turned out that it is not to compete for imaginary
money and to hoard property, but to build a better world together, so that everyone can participate in true
challenges and feel true and lasting joy.

Property and ownership

Property and ownership have, as money, been around for thousands of years, and has been the key
building blocks in the development of the capitalist socio-economic system. So, what about property and
ownership in RBE? I feel the thoughts float towards ‘communism’ and other not-so-nice ‘isms’ here. Shall
we have no ownership and own no property in RBE?

I will make a distinction here between ‘personal property’ and ‘public property’. ‘Personal property‘ is your
movable items that you own, also called ‘movable property’. ‘Public property‘ is what today is dedicated to
the use of the public, owned collectively by the population or the state. Today, one person can own vast
amounts of land and other property as their private property. More and more state property is now also
becoming privately owned. This has been the constant struggle between the capitalists and the state for
millennia. The state and the public want’s to have property available for it’s citizens, while the capitalists
want’s to secure as much property for themselves.

In RBE, some different models can be discussed. Obviously, no one person can own huge amount of land,
like there is today. Still, if a family or a person want’s and needs some land to have a ‘family domain’ to live
on and to grow their own food on, this could be accommodated. Then ‘who’ would accomodate this, one
might ask. In Jacque Fresco’s RBE, there wouldn’t be any ‘state’. Instead, there would be
computerized decision making, determining the fate of humanity. I can not see this working on a large,
global scale. For sure, computers can, and does, make a lot of day to day decisions. And for sure, they can
and will definitely be extended to make more societal decisions than they do today. But, many decisions
will still have to be up to us, the humans. And not to forget, WE are the ones who will be programming the
computers, based on what we want out of them.

I foresee some kind of coordination, where coordinators and informators are assigned to different areas on
the planet. The persons will not have any deciding power, but will coordinate and inform, together with data
technology, what is decided on a particular place. They will be coordinating and informing the community,
so to speak. But the community will have constant voting power in all relevant areas. Not like today, where
someone are elected, and you have to stick with that person for the remainder of the period. I say ‘relevant
areas’, because some things can not be voted upon, like the best angle for the pillar under the bridge that
is to be built. These types of decisions are up to the specialized personell.

Computers
Page 7 of 10 and coordination aside, back to the land. The Venus Project proposes to build
Jul 07,completely newMDT
2016 12:22:43AM
http://www.theresourcebasedeconomy.com/2011/06/will-a-resource-based-economy-work/
Computers and coordination aside, back to the land. The Venus Project proposes to build completely new
cities that would be 100% self sufficient in terms of energy and food production, and very efficient in terms
of transportation, energy use and waste management. This is something that would be a
natural extension of RBE, when the majority of humans starts to think not in terms of money, but in terms of
the betterment of people and the planet. So, new and more efficient cities is a natural way to use the land.
At the same time, existing cities will be optimized as much as possible in terms of energy use,
transportation and waste management. Buildings and parts of cities that are too difficult to optimize, will be
recycled into new uses.

Today we have a lot of farming on the planet. Outside our existing cities there are hectare upon hectare of
fields of all sorts, producing everything from maize to potatoes and rice to grapes. Today, all of the
production of food is dependent on oil, both for transportation, but also for fertilizers and pesticides. An lot
of today’s food production is simply thrown away to uphold the food prizes on the global marked. Too much
bananas? Then we throw some mega tonnes away, so that the rest can be sold for a good prize. Today,
millions of tonnes of food is thrown away every day, because unsold food rot away in supermarkets waste
containers. At the same time our earth and soil and water gets contaminated with all the artificial fertilizers
and pesticides used to grow the food.

I RBE, the new cities will be 100% self sufficient in terms of food production, utilizing both hydroponics,
aquaponics and permaculture principles, providing clean, safe, nutritious and locally produced food all year
round with absolutely no use of artificial fertilizers and pesticides. Very little food will go to waste in RBE,
and we will thus need to produce much less of it, than today. So, some land around the cities will be used
for food production for that respective city. And since there is no competition between food producers, the
food production can be optimized to the true need of the population, minimizing wasteful production and
transportation.

Of course, there will be a lot of room for individual choice in RBE, much more than today, where individual
choice is determined by ones money amount. If one want’s to live on an ‘old type’ farm, on the country side,
one can do this. This is not problem. There is still plenty of land on the planet, and people who want’s to
live in wooden old houses, redecorate themselves and grow their own food, can do that. If they want’s to
combine and use the latest technology on ‘their’ land, they can do that too.

Just as today, we will in RBE have three major categories of land:

1. Cities

2. Country side

3. Wilderness

In difference from today, we will all have access to all of it. Of course, if someone is using it already, and
that use is needed, then that part of the land is ‘taken’. Just like when you come to a beach, you don’t put
your towel on top on someone else’s. No you put your towel somewhere else on the beach. And if the
beach is full, you go somewhere else, or come back another day. And property will be used ‘purposefully’.
If there is a factor there, producing clothing or something else, then that property is used for that, just like
today, except that no one ‘own’ the factory, but all of us. Someone has responsibility over it, but no one
‘owns’ it.

In today’s world, we see that in many cases, things work better if they are privately owned and sold to the
public. At the same time, privately owned corporations can be responsible for a lot of pollution and
misbehaving. In other cases, public services work better than private. It seems like it all boils down to the
individuals
Page 8 of 10 behind it. A corporation can be (quite) environmentally conscious, treat it’s Jul
employers well, andMDT
07, 2016 12:22:43AM
http://www.theresourcebasedeconomy.com/2011/06/will-a-resource-based-economy-work/
individuals behind it. A corporation can be (quite) environmentally conscious, treat it’s employers well, and
work pretty well for all parties. Still, it is totally binded by the demand of the owners and employees to make
profit and ‘go well’ economically speaking. This, more often than not, ruins the businesses possibility to act
in a responsible way when it comes to the environment and to it’s employees.

Then we come to today’s public services. Some work well, some work terrible. At least, there isn’t as
pronounced profit motive here, as with the privately owned corporations, so more regards can be given to
environment and human health. But again, public services are also dependent on money, and thus, are
also somewhat a slave to the profit motive.

Privately or publicly owned. What is best? Again, it seems like it boils down to the persons and the intent
behind it. It is the individual persons with their stronger or weaker intent that drives the results in this.

Non of us want’s a resource based economy to be a new totalitarian dictatorial system. So, back to our first
premise, ‘human values’ and ‘human awakening’. It all boils down to this. We, as individuals have to wake
up and consciously choose this new direction. We have to consciously choose to share our property and
give it up as our ‘own’. We have to understand the value in RBE against today’s system, and choose based
on what works best.

‘Property’ is a mindset. As written in another article, we don’t really ‘own’ anything. ‘Ownership’ is an
illusion. We think we own things, we believe we own stuff, but really, we don’t. At best, we can say that ‘this
is in my possession as long as I need it and use it’. This is the only ‘ownership’ we will ever have
over anything. You have a pair of jeans. You might have bought them in a store, you might have gotten
them as a gift, or you might have picked them up for free in a used clothes container or sharing market. In
any case, you are ‘in possession’ of them right now. You might lend them to a friend, you might give them
away tomorrow, they might be ripped apart by your dog, you might loose them on a trip, or you might throw
them away. In any case, when were they ‘yours’? Were ‘yours’ when they were made at the factory? Are
they still ‘yours’ after you have given them away?

No, the notion of ‘ownership’ and ‘property’ is only a construction to make the capitalistic society work.
Ownership and property has been tools to create the economy and the system we have today, the
monetary capitalistic system. There is no real ownership in nature. There is only temporary use and respect
for each other. As long as we respect each other, our ‘personal space’, then we will have no problems. You
can keep a pair of pants for as long as you will, but they are never truly ‘yours’. You can walk in the forest,
and as you walk on the path, you are using the path, but it is never ‘your property’.

So, how will property and ownership work in a resource based economy? It will work like it works in nature.
You will ‘own’ your creations, but not in a way that prevents others to use them and continue to develop
them. You will ‘own’ your pants, but only as long as you need and want them. You will ‘own’ everything you
need as long as you need it. In other words, all land will be public, but you can grow your own vegetables
on a plot of land and take care of that as ‘your own’ as long as you would like that. But you can’t claim vast
amounts of land as ‘your own’ if you or your family doesn’t need it. You will ‘own’ your ‘personal property’
for as long as you want and need it, and the rest will be public property.

In other words, all land will be public, but one can get designated areas to have for instance a ‘family
domain’ or to grow you own vegetables. In general, we will work together to use land and grow food in the
most sustainable ways, with or without machinery.

Housing will also be common and open to anyone. Meaning that if you want to live one place for a longer
period, you can do that for as long as you want. But if you want to move, you can do that too. And you don’t
need to bring all the furniture with you, since that will exist on the new place. To travel and visit other
countries
Page 9 of 10 and cultures will also be much easier in a resource based economy. Jul 07, 2016 12:22:43AM MDT
 need to bring all the furniture with you, since that will exist on the new
place. To travel and visit other
http://www.theresourcebasedeconomy.com/2011/06/will-a-resource-based-economy-work/
countries and cultures will also be much easier in a resource based economy.

In genreal, the distinction is between ‘ownership’ and ‘accessibility’. It should be pretty clear by now, that
when no one owns anything, but have access to everything, we all will have much much more access to all
the things we today have limited or no access to. At the same time, a lot less would have to be produced of
the same things.

Take cars, for instance. Today we have a vast amount of cars on the planet, and more are produced every
single day. Still, most of them stands still for 90% of the time, not being in use. So, we have parking lots
brim full of unused cars, because we all have to own one. When we instead own nothing, but have access
to everything, we wouldn’t need one tenth of the cars we have today. When we instead share cars, we can
all have access to a lot more cars than when we all have to own one car each. We will even have access to
cars we never dreamed of driving before.

When we share everyone get’s more. Both of land, cars, travel possibilities, boats, clothing, furniture,
technology and what have you. Our choices becomes virtually unlimited in RBE vs. in
today’s ownership system.

For example, Google (one of the new knowledge hubs in RBE) have developed technology for cars so that
they can drive themselves (See video here). With this kind of technology, there wouldn’t be any problem
with sharing cars. One could have a ‘car pool’, where one could simply order a car, and the car would show
up on your front porch. You wouldn’t even have to drive it if you didn’t want to. You could get in, and relax
with a good book, check out the scenery, or take a nap, while the car safely drives you to all the way to
your destination.

Of course, this is only the beginning. Eventually, cars will also be electric, non-polluting, and maybe even
fly!

Conclusion

In summing up, a resource based economy is hard to imagine from our existing mindset and what we are
used to. It sounds to good to be possible. But why not? This might be the only solution we have if we want
to survive as a species. Maybe we simply have to make it work.

Personally, I think RBE is more than possible. I think it is viable and a real solution for humanity. We are
already half way there, with all the voluntarism that exists in the world.

The future is limitless. But only if we let go of the hoarding and self centeredness and look at what is really
possible when we abandon money an focus together on our common future.

Maybe we can look at a resource based economy as the world today, only without money and property, the
hopeless financial crisises, wars and backwards thinking, but with an emphasis on sharing, experimenting,
exploring, collaborating and celebrating.

With a common effort, focussing on values and technology, we can do it. Why not?

Page 10 of 10 Jul 07, 2016 12:22:43AM MDT